Technical specifications or engineering specifications used in various industries are static documents, typically produced using a word processor. These documents contain numerous references to codes, standards and other specifications. They also contain references to other kinds of documents that are intimately related, such as equipment datasheets, inspection and test requirements, bills of material, and other engineering, procurement, and project management documents. In many cases the main engineering specifications are the governing documents, while the information on other closely related specifications and other intimately related documents becomes out-of-spec because they are treated as separate documents.
It would be desirable if related, similar, and repeated information shared among several documents be electronically tied to the governing specifications. More particularly, it would be desirable if the information was not duplicated at all-that duplicated or related information reside only in the master specifications. More particularly yet, it would be desirable if the various related documents were not additional standalone documents at all, but instead, were alternative views and printouts from metadata contained in the master specifications themselves.
The invention relates to a method of leveraging XML (eXtensible Markup Language) technology, and/or similar modeling languages such as ontology definition languages, OWL, RDL, HTML, and others, and more particularly, the attribution and multi-node data modeling, object orientation, classes, and linkage capabilities of such languages and technologies, specifically for the purpose authoring new, and translating existing specifications in such a way that the base textual content is augmented with additional information (aka metadata) in such a way that other sub-specifications, datasheets, inspection and quality assurance documents, etc. do not need to be written separately, but instead become logical sub-components of the governing specifications themselves.
Furthermore, this invention relates to the design and development of computer software and user interface, and configuration files that enable the application of said method.
For the above cited reasons it is an object of the invention to provide both a data model and computer software to enable engineers and other professionals and responsibilities to “multi task”, that is, create several documents for various purposes and workflows and business requirements from a single editing session.
For the data model, for each specification paragraph, in addition to the main textual component, the appropriate attributes and/or elements are created and defined by schema to support said multitasking and the storing of related information for related purposes.
For the computer program and user interface, the ability for the user to write the main textual components of the specification while having simultaneously in view the content of the various metadata, as necessary, and being able to edit all at the same time.
Applicable to both data model and user interface, is the automatic linking and electronic management of the relationships of each paragraph and its metadata, as well as the ability to publish the main spec and it's related sub-specifications and/or documents automatically.
The invention provides a system for automation of specifications that allows for the uniform creation and/or loading of information used in forming technical specifications into an automated and indexed data model, preferably using an XML spec schema and XML conventions or other similar modeling technologies such as ontology definition language(s), OWL, RDL, etc. This enables the technical specifications, specifications, codes and/or standards being utilized to be converted into electronic data that is in a standardized form based on the schema provided. The model allows specific information to be tagged and/or coded into specific fields so that they can be easily drawn from the Specification, referenced or updated in a uniform manner. Additionally, specific information and/or requirements can be tagged in or on spec paragraphs allowing these items to be separately drawn from and/or indexed in the technical specifications. For example, all inspection and test criteria requirements, codes, standards, etc. can be tagged so that they can be easily accessed, drawn from the technical specification and/or indexed separately.
The specification itself, in browse-able tree view is shown in the bottom left pane 120.
The top center pane 130 shows an individual vendor information requirement item. It has a field for the main text, but also shows user input fields for the various metadata, such as “PkgNo” (Package Number), “Status”, “CtrlNo” (Control Number), “Date/Time”, “Keyword”, “Reminder”, and so on. This information, collectively for all similar items in the subject XML files, is sufficient to generate a full Vendor Information Requirements package.
The top right pane 140 shows other items and main specification paragraphs that are electronically linked to the VIRF item. These relationships are managed automatically and all changes to any interrelated item propagates through all of them.
The bottom center pane 150 shows one of the main specification paragraphs including it's various metadata. Specifically, note checkboxes named “Data”, “VIRF”, “Bid Tab” (Bid Tabulation), and “Insp” (Inspection). These checkboxes mark (or un-mark) the paragraph as a provider (or non-provider) of some or all of this additional data. When the user hovers over these checkboxes she can add additional information for each requirement. In this example, the user can specify “Exchanger Arrangement”, while simultaneously specifying which drawings this shall be shown on, and simultaneously generating an inspection checklist that will allow a quality assurance engineer to access the appropriate drawing, automatically with the appropriate specification paragraph, to verify these “Exchanger Arrangement” at a supplier's works after manufacture. The invention relates to a method of accomplishing all of this directly from the main paragraphs' interfaces, and not sequentially created multiple documents that can later become dis-synchronized, as it is done today.
The system is implemented utilizing a PC or other computer processor programmed with the specific method according to the invention.
The system is implemented such that various documents and concepts that are derivative of the main specification, called “Child Documents”, live as flags or attributes on main specification paragraph objects, so that they are not stand alone documents and never become dis-synchronized from the main specification. These Child Documents are therefore not separately created, and can be generated while working on the main technical specification. The Child Documents can be attachments, subsidiaries, lists and various other documents and concepts that this environment considers as sub-sets of technical codes and standards. This list includes, but is not limited to, datasheets, inspection and test plans, and requirements, information requirements (e.g., vendor information requirements), etc. Child Documents can be generated from content in the main specification. Content in the main specification may be marked and/or tagged in the computer application either directly (i.e., in the main body text), or indirectly, i.e. tags and/or additional information are associated with specific paragraphs of the main specification.
The system further provides for “Item Level Granularity” for revision and history control. This can be implemented by a GUID (Globally Unique Identifier) or a URI (Universal Resource Identifier) or URL (Universal Resource Locator). This enables objects to be uniquely identified in the system and disassociate the objects from the paragraph number and other user attributes, so that if the main specification is renumbered in the future, paragraph-level revision and history are not lost. Item Level granularity can be implemented by maintaining an archive xml document backing each main xml document that maintains all ‘stale’ objects.
Further, the system provides discipline-specific views, functionalities and workflows. These are externally configurable by a configuration file, and thus do not require the recompilation of the product.
The system also has the functionality of providing reminders. That is, there is the ability of any object or entity in the main specification to record a reminder. These reminders have due dates as well as the ability to “snooze.”
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 61/161,093 filed on Mar. 18, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5596350 | Capps et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
6405211 | Sokol et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6546397 | Rempell | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6874121 | Mayer | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6904562 | Hind et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6976213 | Letourneau et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7039859 | Sundaresan | May 2006 | B1 |
7594168 | Rempell | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7756819 | Jang et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7954048 | Gauthier et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8122428 | Dharmagadda | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8321241 | Mansour et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
20020065848 | Walker et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020087551 | Hickey et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089169 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020128994 | Sadhasivan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030041077 | Davis et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030074419 | VanderDrift | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040024662 | Gray et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040148307 | Rempell | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040220815 | Belanger et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040268304 | Kuo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050097462 | Lumera et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131714 | Braunstein et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050260974 | Lee et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262130 | Mohan | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004738 | Blackwell et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060069986 | Sandoval | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060117294 | Vogler | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060123337 | Koinuma | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149770 | Jang et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155782 | Berstis et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060206512 | Hanrahan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206523 | Gaurav et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060253490 | Krishna et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070035403 | Krishna et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070067336 | Horany | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070079236 | Schrier et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070186157 | Walker et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080005138 | Gauthier et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046254 | Nuno et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080189313 | Heinkel et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215957 | Rapp et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228671 | Nagaraj | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080282148 | Xu | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090007058 | Dharmagadda | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043824 | Claghorn | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090125546 | Iborra et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090204421 | Guimaraes | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090248443 | Kelly et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100010968 | Redlich et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100070930 | Thibault | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Wilson Cooke website, Spec Builder—Streamlining Project Specifications, “Spec Construction Tool | Specification Software—Spec Builder” 2 pages, accessed online at <http://www.specificationbuilder.co.uk/> on May 27, 2014. |
Wilson Cooke website, Spec Builder—Streamlining Project Specifications, “About Spec Builder—The Spec Construction Tool”, 3 pages, accessed online at <http://www.specificationbuilder.co.uk/specbuilder.php> on May 27, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110289120 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61161093 | Mar 2009 | US |