Spectrum sharing between an aircraft-based air-to-ground communication system and existing geostationary satellite services

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8442519
  • Patent Number
    8,442,519
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 29, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 14, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
The present Spectrum Sharing System implements spectrum reuse between aircraft-based Air-To-Ground (ATG) communication systems and Geostationary Satellite Service systems. This is accomplished by managing the radio frequency transmissions in the volume of space in which the aircraft operates, with interference between the Spectrum Sharing System and the Geostationary Satellite Service system being reduced by implementing reversed uplink and downlink radio frequency paths in the common spectrum. The Spectrum Sharing System also avoids interfering with Geostationary Satellite Services' earth stations which are pointed towards the satellites' orbital arc by relying upon a combination of the earth stations' highly directive antenna patterns and the Spectrum Sharing System ground station antenna pattern, and to avoid interfering with satellites in their orbital arc by assuring that power levels radiated in that direction by the Spectrum Sharing System ground stations are below the level that would create interference.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to Air-To-Ground (ATG) communications and, in particular, to a communication system that provides communication devices, which are served by a communication network located on an aircraft, with high speed Air-To-Ground communications service by the reuse of the radio frequency spectrum presently used by Geostationary Satellite Services extant in the volume of space in which the aircraft operates.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

It is a problem in the field of Air-To-Ground (ATG) communications, such as between aircraft and ATG ground stations, to provide sufficient bandwidth to carry the communications between the communication devices, which are served by a communication network (wired or wireless) located on the aircraft, and ATG ground stations which are connected to terrestrial communication networks. The collection of ATG ground stations used for this purpose implement a traditional cellular network, with each ATG ground station consisting of a “cell site.” There are limited choices of spectrum which are available for this purpose, which choices are also limited by the ability to implement the corresponding radio frequency antennas on the aircraft.


The typical ATG cellular communications network consists of a number of terrestrial (ground) ATG base stations, each of which provides a radio frequency coverage area in a predetermined volume of space, radially arranged around the cell site transmitting and receiving antennas. This terrestrial base station uses antenna patterns which are less sensitive to the reception of ground-originating or ground-reflected signals and which antenna patterns are primarily focused on the area between the horizon and zenith. The terrestrial base stations are geographically distributed, generally following a typical cellular communications network layout. Terrestrial base stations can also be co-located near airports to enable network coverage when aircraft are on the ground; in this case, the antenna patterns are optimized for terrestrially-located aircraft. The boundaries of the coverage area of each terrestrial base station are substantially contiguous with that of neighboring sites so that the composite coverage of all of the terrestrial base stations in the ATG cellular communications network generally provides coverage over the targeted area. Terrestrial base stations may provide either a single omni-cell of coverage using transceiver(s) associated with a single transmit-and-receive antenna system or multiple sectors within the area of coverage of the site, each with associated transceivers and the associated transmit-and-receive antennas. The advantage of the latter arrangement, with multiple sectors per terrestrial base station, is to allow provision of increased call and data traffic handling capacity in the coverage area of that terrestrial base station.


The present radio frequency spectrum which is available for this purpose limits the total available traffic handling capacity in any single cell. Thus, the radio frequency communications link between the aircraft and the terrestrial base stations of the ATG cellular communications network has limited capacity and, as passengers utilize the aircraft network for Internet browsing and broadband file downloads, the channel capacity becomes exhausted before the demand is served in its entirety. More advantageous spectrum choices are presently unavailable, because they are dedicated for pre-existing uses, such as satellite communications.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The above-described problems are solved and a technical advance achieved in the field by the present Spectrum Sharing Between An Aircraft-Based Air-To-Ground Communication System And Existing Geostationary Satellite Services (termed “Spectrum Sharing System” herein) which implements spectrum reuse between aircraft-based Air-To-Ground (ATG) communication systems and Geostationary Satellite Service systems. This is accomplished by managing the radio frequency transmissions in the volume of space in which the aircraft operates, with interference between the Spectrum Sharing System and the Geostationary Satellite Service system being reduced by implementing reversed uplink and downlink radio frequency paths in the common spectrum. The Spectrum Sharing System also avoids interfering with Geostationary Satellite Services' earth stations which are pointed towards the satellites' orbital arc by relying upon a combination of the earth stations' highly directive antenna patterns and the Spectrum Sharing System ground station antenna pattern, and to avoid interfering with satellites in their orbital arc by assuring that power levels radiated in that direction by the Spectrum Sharing System ground stations are below the level that would create interference.


The present Spectrum Sharing System thereby provides increased bandwidth to provide communication devices, which are served by a communication network located on an aircraft, with high speed Air-To-Ground communications service, since the selected frequencies provide greater bandwidth than those presently in use in ATG communications or can be used to supplement the ATG frequencies presently in use. Interference between the Spectrum Sharing System and the Geostationary Satellite Service system is reduced by implementing reversed uplink and downlink radio frequency paths in the common spectrum. Furthermore, one of the conditions for mitigation of interference between the two systems is that the transmission of the Spectrum Sharing System ground station is outside of the main beams of the Geostationary Satellite Service earth station antennas. This means that, in the Northern Hemisphere, the Spectrum Sharing System ground station needs to be transmitting in a southerly direction into the back lobe of the earth station antenna of the Geostationary Satellite Service system, which is transmitting in a southerly direction toward the Geostationary satellites; and in the Southern Hemisphere, the Spectrum Sharing System ground station needs to be transmitting in the northerly direction into the back lobe of the earth station antenna of the Geostationary Satellite Service system, which is transmitting in a northerly direction toward the Geostationary satellites.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a graphic representation of the radio frequency spectrum sharing plan, between Air-To-Ground systems and satellite based systems, which is implemented by the present Spectrum Sharing System;



FIG. 2 illustrates, in graphical form, the limit on the aircraft transmit power spectral density in dBm [the power ratio in decibels (dB) of the measured power referenced to one milliwatt (mW)] per 1 MHz (megahertz) of allocated spectrum for the present Spectrum Sharing System, where the power is charted as a function of number of aircraft and desired level of protection for the geo-stationary satellite receivers;



FIG. 3 illustrates, in graphical form, the portion of a geostationary arc visible from the location of an earth station;



FIG. 4 illustrates, in graphical form, the required conditions for Air-To-Ground transmission outside of the main lobe of earth station antennas;



FIG. 5 illustrates the orientation of Shared Spectrum System ground stations and aircraft in relation to Geostationary Satellite Service earth stations; and



FIG. 6 illustrates the antenna pointing angle from the Geostationary Satellite Service system is in a southerly direction, ranging from a low azimuth angle for Geostationary Satellite Service earth stations in the northern extent of the coverage area to a high azimuth angle for Geostationary Satellite Service earth stations in the southern extent of the coverage area.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

As shown in FIG. 5, a satellite 501 in a geostationary orbit appears to be in a fixed position to an earth-based observer. A geostationary satellite 501 revolves around the earth at a constant speed once per day over the equator, thus matching the speed of rotation of the earth and appearing stationary relative to any point on the earth's surface. The geostationary orbit is useful for communications applications because earth station antennas 511, 512, which must be directed toward satellite 501, can operate effectively without the need for expensive equipment to track the satellite's motion. Since geostationary satellites are constrained to operate above the equator, a geostationary satellite appears low on the horizon to the earth station antennas when i) earth stations are near the easternmost or westernmost coverage limits of a satellite; or ii) when earth stations are at high latitudes. For most earth stations operating within the continental US, the geostationary satellite is 20° to 50° above the horizon; and the beam width of antennas is sufficiently narrow (on the order of 2° or less) to avoid ground reflections and interference between satellites.


Radio Frequency Spectrum Sharing Plan



FIG. 1 illustrates a graphic representation of an illustrative embodiment of the radio frequency spectrum sharing plan, between the present Spectrum Sharing System 11 and Geostationary Satellite Service system 13, to provide communications services to communication devices (not shown) which are located onboard aircraft 12. In the present Spectrum Sharing System 11, uplink transmissions from Spectrum Sharing System ground stations 11G to aircraft 12 use an existing satellite downlink frequency band F1 (and optionally the existing satellite uplink frequency band F2 and optionally the existing ATG frequency band), while downlink transmissions from aircraft 12 to Spectrum Sharing System ground stations 11G use an existing satellite uplink frequency band F2 (and optionally the existing ATG frequency band). The two systems (Spectrum Sharing System 11 and Geostationary Satellite Service system 13) are co-spectrum, and there exists a possibility for mutual interference which may be in both the uplink and downlink directions. There are four possibilities for interference:

    • 1. From the Spectrum Sharing System Aircraft transmitter (not shown, but located in aircraft 12) to the Geostationary Satellite Service system satellite receiver;
    • 2. From the Spectrum Sharing System ground station transmitter to the Geostationary Satellite Service system earth station receiver;
    • 3. From the Geostationary Satellite Service system earth station transmitter to the Spectrum Sharing System ground station receiver; and
    • 4. From the Geostationary Satellite Service system satellite transmitter to the Spectrum Sharing System Aircraft receiver (not shown, but located in aircraft 12).


Interference from the Spectrum Sharing System 11 to the Geostationary Satellite Service system 13 is more significant than the interference in the opposite direction due to the differences in signal power and the highly directional antenna patterns used in the Geostationary Satellite Service system 13. There are two primary cases of this interference between Spectrum Sharing System 11 and Geostationary Satellite Service system 13 as is illustrated in FIG. 1. Case 1 illustrated in FIG. 1 is interference from the Spectrum Sharing System aircraft transmitter at frequency F2 to the satellite receiver 13 of the Geostationary Satellite Service system 13, and Case 2 illustrated in FIG. 1 is interference from Spectrum Sharing System ground station 11G transmitter at frequency F1 to the Geostationary Satellite Services earth station 13G receiver.


Interference Between Spectrum Sharing System and the Geostationary Satellite Service


The interference in Case 1, where the aircraft radio frequency transmissions on frequency F2 interfere with the satellite received radio frequency signals, is relatively low. On the ground, Geostationary Satellite Service signals on frequency F1 are extremely weak unless received by an accurately pointed high gain antenna, such as that used by the earth station 13G of the Geostationary Satellite Service system 13. Geostationary Satellite Service earth station antennas are usually high gain antennas that radiate only through a very narrow beam upwardly directed toward the satellite 14 with which the Geostationary Satellite Service earth station 13G communicates. With a minimum precaution in the location of the Spectrum Sharing System ground stations 11G, this interference can be easily avoided.



FIG. 5 illustrates the orientation (but not drawn to scale) of a plurality of Shared Spectrum System ground stations 531-533 (which are but a few of those that are necessary to provide complete coverage of the service area which consists of the region of space 500 between the earth surface and the maximum altitude at which the aircraft are operational) and aircraft 551-553 in relation to Geostationary Satellite Service geo-synchronous satellites 500 and earth stations 511-512. As can be seen from this figure, the antenna beam 521-522 for the Geostationary Satellite Service earth station antennas 511-512 is narrow in extent and upwardly directed at the orbital arc of the selected geosynchronous satellites 500 located above the equator. The antenna pointing angle from the Geostationary Satellite Service system 13 is in a southerly direction, ranging from a low azimuth angle for earth stations 512 in the northern extent of the coverage area to a high azimuth angle for earth stations 511 in the southern extent of the coverage area, as illustrated in FIG. 6. In contrast, the Shared Spectrum System antenna beams 541-543, while also upwardly pointing and generally pointing towards just above the horizon, are broad in extent. The primary interference mode constitutes the Shared Spectrum System antenna beams 541-543 being received by the Geostationary Satellite Service earth station 511-512 antennas. Therefore, radio frequency transmission management requires:

    • “Southerly” pointing of the Spectrum Sharing System ground station antennas for signals at low elevation angles, with any northern facing signals at angles well above the horizon. This way, the Spectrum Sharing System ground station transmission is outside of the main beams for the Fixed Satellite Service earth station receiver antennas. The limits of the coverage of the Spectrum Sharing System antennas at any particular latitude are governed by the range of azimuth angles to the orbital arc, as illustrated in FIG. 5, with a small additional allowance for the maximum beamwidth of the earth station receive antennas.
    • To maintain low power spectral density on the Spectrum Sharing System ground station transmission, the signal may need to be spread over a large portion of spectrum. Fortunately, several satellites bands provide hundreds of MHz of spectrum, which is sufficient to reduce spectral density to sufficiently low levels while maintaining high data rates from the ground to the aircraft.


From the interference mitigation standpoint, use of antennas with highly discriminating patterns on both ends of the Spectrum Sharing System spectrum would be highly beneficial. Additional techniques that may be used for interference mitigation are:

    • 1. Placement of the Spectrum Sharing System ground stations;
    • 2. Antenna patterns of the Spectrum Sharing System ground stations, including beam forming and beam steering;
    • 3. Signal spreading;
    • 4. Power control; and
    • 5. Active interference cancelation in case of beam steering.


      Evaluation of the Ground Station Transmission to Earth Station Receiver


As an example, when viewed from the continental US, the orbit of a geostationary satellite is in a southerly direction. All of the Geostationary Satellite Service earth station antennas, therefore, are pointing towards the south. Depending on the latitude of the earth station, only a portion of the geostationary arc of the satellite is visible. The situation is illustrated in FIG. 3. For any given geographical location of the earth station, there are two longitudes that limit the visible portion of the geostationary arc, which are labeled as lE and lW. Therefore, the antenna of the earth station always points to some location on the visible portion of this geostationary arc. As the latitude of the earth station increases towards north, the portion of the visible arc becomes smaller. For earth stations that are above ˜80° north, the geostationary orbit is not visible.


Consider an earth station at the latitude/longitude location given by a pair of coordinates (LES, lES). Coordinate LES is the earth station latitude, while lES is the earth station longitude. Using simple geometry, one can easily demonstrate the following relationships:















l
E

=


l
ES

-


cos

-
1




(


r
e



r
s



cos


(

L
ES

)




)








(
1
)












l
W

=


l
ES

+


cos

-
1




(


r
e



r
s



cos


(

L
ES

)




)








(
2
)












A
ZE

=
Y





(
3
)













A
ZW

=


360

°

-
Y











where





(
4
)






Y
=



tan

-
1




(


sin


(

.5


L
ES


)




tan


(




l
E

-

L
ES




)




cos


(

0.5


L
ES


)




)


+



tan

-
1




(


cos


(

.5


L
ES


)




tan


(




l
E

-

L
ES




)




sin


(

0.5


L
ES


)




)


.






(
5
)







Quantities AZE and AZW are azimuth angles from the earth station towards far east and far west points on the visible portion of the geostationary arc. These two angles provide maximum theoretical range of directions where the earth station antenna may point. In practical scenarios, the range is always narrower than what is provided by equations (3) and (4).


As an illustration, Table 1 provides values for lE, lW, AZE, and AZW for two earth stations. The first one is located in Melbourne, Fla., while the second one is in Chicago, Ill. In the Melbourne area, the azimuth for the earth station antennas must fall within the range of from 95.51° to 273.49°. For the Chicago earth stations, the pointing range extends from 99.33° to 269.67°.









TABLE 1







Geostationary Satellite visible from two locations in the continental US










Melbourne,




Florida
Chicago, Illinois













Latitude (deg)
28.0628
41.9978


Longitude (deg)
80.6231
87.6831


lE (deg, W)
2.21
11.48


lW (deg, W)
159.04
163.89


Length of the arc (deg)
78.42
76.21


Azimuth to far east point AZE (deg)
95.51
99.33


Azimuth to far west point AZW (deg)
273.49
269.67









Referring back to the radio frequency reuse scenario presented in FIG. 1, it is evident that one of the conditions for mitigation of interference between the two systems is that the radio frequency transmission of the Spectrum Sharing System ground station is outside of the main beams of the earth station antennas. This means that the Spectrum Sharing System ground station needs to be transmitting towards the south within the range of azimuth angles as specified by equations (3) and (4) (with small additional reductions as required to avoid the beamwidth of the earth station antennas). This way, the signal from the Spectrum Sharing System ground stations is in the back lobe of the Geostationary Satellite Service earth station antenna. FIG. 4 illustrates, in graphical form, the required conditions for the Spectrum Sharing System uplink transmission outside of the main lobe of the Geostationary Satellite Service earth station antennas.


The power spectrum density of the interference from the Spectrum Sharing System ground station transmission at the back lobe of the earth station antenna may be calculated as:

SI=SATGGATG(θ)−PLdB=EiRP/W−PLdB  (6)


One may assume that the impact of the Spectrum Sharing System ground station transmission becomes negligible when the SI in equation (6) falls below the noise floor by a certain threshold. That is:

EiRP/W[dBm/MHz]≦10 log(kT)+PLdB−TdB+90  (7)


Table 2 is generated using equation (7) and assuming TdB=3 dB. The table specifies the maximum Effective Isotropic Radiated Power (EiRP) per MHz allowed for the ground-to-air transmission. The use of the table is illustrated through a following simple example.


Consider a Spectrum Sharing System ground station in a location that is 20 km away from the closest Geostationary Satellite Service earth station. The allowed ground station power spectrum density is 23 dBm/MHz (i.e., 200 mW/MHz). Assuming the Spectrum Sharing System uplink operation is 20 MHz of the spectrum, the overall EiRP is 36.04 dBm (4 W).









TABLE 2







Limit on the uplink EiRP in dBm/MHz(*)













EiRP/W




d [km]
Path loss [dB]
[dBm/MHz]
EiRP [dBm]
EiRP [W]














1
113.99
−2.99
10.02
0.01


5
127.97
10.99
24.00
0.25


10
133.99
17.01
30.02
1.00


15
137.51
20.53
33.54
2.26


20
140.01
23.03
36.04
4.02


25
141.95
24.97
37.98
6.28


30
143.53
26.55
39.56
9.04


35
144.87
27.89
40.90
12.31


40
146.03
29.05
42.06
16.08






(*)The EiRP values are calculated assuming 20 MHz channel







Based on Table 2, the allowed power spectral density for Spectrum Sharing System uplink transmission is relatively low. The table assumes that there is no additional attenuation from the back lobe of the earth station antennas. Also, the table is derived assuming no discrimination from the Spectrum Sharing System ground station antenna. In the practical implementation, these additional factors should be evaluated on the basis of required data rates and Spectrum Sharing System cell site link budgets.



FIG. 4 illustrates, in graphical form, the required conditions for Spectrum Sharing System uplink transmissions to be outside of the main lobe of the Geostationary Satellite Service earth station antennas. In particular, Geostationary Satellite Service earth stations 421-436 are shown with their respective antenna beams pointing toward satellites 411-414 of FIG. 4. For the Spectrum Sharing System ground stations 401-408 not to transmit into the receiver antennas at the Geostationary Satellite Service earth stations 421-436, their antenna beams should be oriented as shown in FIG. 4 to prevent the near-earth surface portion of the beam (i.e. the southern portion of the beam) from being received by the main lobe of the Geostationary Satellite Service earth stations 421-436. This is not unduly limiting, since the antenna pattern generated by the Shared Spectrum System antennas are broad three-dimensional shapes and can be managed to avoid the near-ground portions of the pattern in the direction of any nearby Geostationary Satellite Service earth stations 421-436 that are generally north of the ground stations. This does not affect the upwardly pointing segment of the antenna pattern from the Shared Spectrum System antennas.


Evaluation of the Interference from Aircraft-Based Transmissions to the Satellite Receiver


From the standpoint of the satellite receiver, the energy transmitted from the Spectrum Sharing System aircraft adds to the noise temperature of the satellite receiver antenna. The satellite receiver antenna is pointing toward the earth, which has a nominal noise temperature of 290K. Therefore, as long as the power spectrum density produced by the Spectrum Sharing System aircraft transmission is significantly smaller than the power spectrum density of the thermal noise generated by the earth's radiation, the impact of the spectrum sharing is negligible. The power spectral density of the Spectrum Sharing System aircraft transmission depends on the EiRP of the aircraft, the bandwidth of the Spectrum Sharing System service, and the number of aircraft that are operating at any given time within the main beam of the satellite antenna.


The power spectral density of the thermal noise received by the satellite antenna may be calculated as:













N
0

=



kT
E







=



1.38
×

10

-
23





W

Hz
·
K


·
290






K







=




4
×

10

-
21




W
Hz


->


-
204






dBW


/


Hz









(
8
)







The power spectral density of the interference to the satellite receiver that is caused by the transmission from the Spectrum Sharing System aircraft may be estimated as:










N
A

=


n
·

S
A



F





S





P





L






(
9
)







Where n is the number of aircraft within the main beam of the satellite antenna, SA is the radiated power spectral density of a single aircraft and the Free Space Path Loss (FSPL) in the linear domain.


By converting equation (9) into log domain, one obtains:

NA[dBW/Hz]=10 log(n)+SA[dBW/Hz]−FSPLdB  (10)


Let TdB be a threshold value that specifies the difference between the power spectral densities of thermal noise and the interference caused by operating Spectrum Sharing System aircraft. In other words:

TdB=N0[dBW/Hz]−NA[dBW/Hz]  (11)


By combining equations (10) and (11), one obtains the limit on transmit power spectrum density of a single aircraft:

SA[dBm/MHz]=N0[dBW/Hz]+FSPLdB−10 log(n)−TdB+90  (12)


Equation (12) is used to generate the family of curves presented in FIG. 2 which illustrates, in graphical form, the limit on the aircraft transmit power spectral density in dBm per 1 MHz of allocated spectrum for the present Spectrum Sharing System.


Use of the Curves in FIG. 2 is Illustrated Through a Simple Example


Consider a case when the Spectrum Sharing System is operating on 1,000 aircraft within the volume of space covered by the satellite receiver antenna. Assume that the protection threshold is set to Tadd=20 dB, and that all of the aircraft are in the main beam of the satellite receiver antenna. According to FIG. 2, the transmission of each aircraft has a power spectral density limit of 43 dBm/MHz (20 Watts in 1 MHz bandwidth).


One point to note is that the presented analysis is on the worst case side. There are additional factors that would reduce the interference from the Spectrum Sharing System aircraft to the satellite receiver. Some of those factors, which were neglected in the analysis, may be listed as follows:

    • 1. The analysis assumes that all of the aircraft are transmitting with the maximum power. In operational scenarios, the transmission of the aircraft is under power control and is always below the maximum value.
    • 2. The analysis assumes that the EiRP of the aircraft is the same towards the serving cells on the ground and towards the satellite antenna. In practical implementation, it is reasonable to assume that the aircraft antenna directs most of the energy towards the ground, and the amount of radiation towards the sky would be significantly lower.


      Only Free Space Path Losses are considered. In a practical scenario, additional losses due to atmospheric phenomena add to the attenuation of the aircraft-generated signal.


SUMMARY

Spectrum sharing between the Spectrum Sharing System and the Geostationary Satellite Service is possible. However, to make the sharing technically feasible, careful management of the interference between the Spectrum Sharing System ground station and the Geostationary Satellite Service earth station receiver side is required.

Claims
  • 1. A system for providing wireless communication services to communication devices that are located in an aircraft that is operational in a selected coverage area, wherein at least one geostationary satellite communication system is operational in the selected coverage area and uses a plurality of earth stations, each of which transmit radio frequency signals in a narrow-shaped beam that is directed skyward, in a direction toward the equator of the earth, to a satellite at a first radio frequency and receive radio frequency signals from the satellite, at a second radio frequency, using the narrow-shaped beam that is directed skyward at the satellite, comprising: at least one ground station for creating a radio frequency coverage area that provides radio frequency links to aircraft that are operational in the radio frequency coverage area, comprising: a transmitter that generates a radio frequency signal at the second radio frequency for transmission to the aircraft; andan antenna that produces a broad-shaped beam of the radio frequency signal generated at the second radio frequency, which broad-shaped beam is directed skyward in a direction toward the equator of the earth and which substantially fails to radiate into any narrow-shaped beam of the earth stations of the geostationary satellite communication system.
  • 2. The system for providing wireless communication services of claim 1 further comprising: wherein the aircraft uses the first radio frequency to transmit radio frequency signals to the ground station.
  • 3. The system for providing wireless communication services of claim 2 wherein the at least one ground station comprises: a receiver which operates at the first radio frequency to receive radio frequency signals transmitted from an aircraft to the ground station.
  • 4. The system for providing wireless communication services of claim 1 further comprising: wherein the antenna of the at least one ground station produces a broad-shaped beam that is directed skyward to avoid near-ground portions of the narrow-shaped beam of nearby earth stations.
  • 5. The system for providing wireless communication services of claim 1 further comprising: wherein each ground station is located at sites which are outside of a path of the narrow-shaped beam.
  • 6. A method for providing wireless communication services to wireless communication devices that are located in an aircraft that is operational in a selected coverage area, wherein at least one geostationary satellite communication system is operational in the selected coverage area and uses a plurality of earth stations, each of which transmit radio frequency signals in a narrow-shaped beam that is directed skyward, in a direction toward the equator of the earth, to a satellite at a first radio frequency and receive radio frequency signals from the satellite, at a second radio frequency, using the narrow-shaped beam that is directed skyward at the satellite, comprising: operating at least one ground station for creating a radio frequency coverage area that provides radio frequency links to aircraft that are operational in the radio frequency coverage area, comprising: generating a radio frequency signal at the second radio frequency for transmission to the aircraft; andoperating an antenna to produce a broad-shaped beam of the radio frequency signal generated at the second radio frequency, which broad-shaped beam is directed skyward in a direction toward the equator of the earth and which substantially fails to radiate into any narrow-shaped beam of the earth stations of the geostationary satellite communication system.
  • 7. The method for providing wireless communication services of claim 6 further comprising: wherein the aircraft uses the first radio frequency to transmit radio frequency signals to the ground station.
  • 8. The method for providing wireless communication services of claim 6 further comprising: wherein the antenna of the at least one ground station produces a broad-shaped beam that is directed skyward to avoid near-ground portions of the narrow-shaped beam of nearby earth stations.
  • 9. The method for providing wireless communication services of claim 6 wherein operating the at least one ground station comprises: operating a receiver at the first radio frequency to receive radio frequency signals transmitted from an aircraft to the ground station.
  • 10. The method for providing wireless communication services of claim 6 further comprising: wherein each ground station is located at sites which are outside of a path of the narrow-shaped beam.
US Referenced Citations (112)
Number Name Date Kind
3659085 Potter et al. Apr 1972 A
4115777 Taylor Sep 1978 A
4654867 Labedz et al. Mar 1987 A
5042027 Takase et al. Aug 1991 A
5123112 Choate Jun 1992 A
5212804 Choate May 1993 A
5408515 Bhagat et al. Apr 1995 A
5432841 Rimer Jul 1995 A
5459469 Schuchman et al. Oct 1995 A
5519761 Gilhousen May 1996 A
5543779 Aspesi et al. Aug 1996 A
5555444 Diekelman et al. Sep 1996 A
5590395 Diekelman Dec 1996 A
5651050 Bhagat et al. Jul 1997 A
5659304 Chakraborty Aug 1997 A
5678174 Tayloe Oct 1997 A
5740535 Rune Apr 1998 A
5754959 Ueno et al. May 1998 A
5805683 Berberich, Jr. Sep 1998 A
5822680 Stuart et al. Oct 1998 A
5826188 Tayloe et al. Oct 1998 A
5832380 Ray et al. Nov 1998 A
5848359 Furtaw Dec 1998 A
5887258 Lemozit et al. Mar 1999 A
5950129 Schmid et al. Sep 1999 A
5956644 Miller et al. Sep 1999 A
5995805 Ogasawara et al. Nov 1999 A
5995833 Zicker Nov 1999 A
6002944 Beyda Dec 1999 A
6009330 Kennedy, III et al. Dec 1999 A
6040781 Murray Mar 2000 A
6055425 Sinivaara Apr 2000 A
6104926 Hogg et al. Aug 2000 A
6144338 Davies Nov 2000 A
6195529 Linz et al. Feb 2001 B1
6263206 Potochniak et al. Jul 2001 B1
6263371 Geagan, III et al. Jul 2001 B1
6304762 Myers et al. Oct 2001 B1
6314286 Zicker Nov 2001 B1
6317435 Tiedemann, Jr. et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324398 Lanzerotti et al. Nov 2001 B1
6353734 Wright et al. Mar 2002 B1
6392692 Monroe May 2002 B1
6393281 Capone et al. May 2002 B1
6418327 Carey et al. Jul 2002 B1
6430412 Hogg et al. Aug 2002 B1
6545601 Monroe Apr 2003 B1
6546426 Post Apr 2003 B1
6567052 Wang et al. May 2003 B1
6570851 Koskelainen et al. May 2003 B1
6577419 Hall et al. Jun 2003 B1
6580915 Kroll Jun 2003 B1
6615052 Parmenter Sep 2003 B1
6690928 Konishi et al. Feb 2004 B1
6735438 Sabatino May 2004 B1
6735500 Nicholas et al. May 2004 B2
6735633 Welch et al. May 2004 B1
6741841 Mitchell May 2004 B1
6754489 Roux Jun 2004 B1
6757712 Bastian et al. Jun 2004 B1
6760778 Nelson et al. Jul 2004 B1
6788935 McKenna et al. Sep 2004 B1
6799037 Mielke et al. Sep 2004 B1
6880750 Pentel Apr 2005 B2
6889042 Rousseau et al. May 2005 B2
6892068 Karabinis et al. May 2005 B2
6944169 Yoshizawa et al. Sep 2005 B1
7050755 Kline May 2006 B2
7062268 McKenna Jun 2006 B2
7107062 Cruz et al. Sep 2006 B2
7280535 Bergman et al. Oct 2007 B1
7346677 Mohaban et al. Mar 2008 B1
8060083 Malosh Nov 2011 B2
20020010633 Brotherston Jan 2002 A1
20020045444 Usher et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020059614 Lipsanen et al. May 2002 A1
20020090931 Papineau et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020123344 Criqui et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020155833 Borel Oct 2002 A1
20030032426 Gilbert et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046701 O'Donnell Mar 2003 A1
20030050746 Baiada et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055975 Nelson et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030084108 Syed May 2003 A1
20030093187 Walker May 2003 A1
20030103521 Raphaeli et al. Jun 2003 A1
20040063433 Garrison Apr 2004 A1
20040102156 Loner May 2004 A1
20040137840 La Chapelle et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040142658 McKenna et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040203918 Moriguchi et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050053026 Mullan et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050071076 Baiada et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050216938 Brady et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050221875 Grossman et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060009262 Hamm Jan 2006 A1
20060048196 Yau Mar 2006 A1
20060064746 Aaron et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060199532 Soliman Sep 2006 A1
20070021117 McKenna et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070042772 Salkini et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070064604 Chen et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070087756 Hoffberg Apr 2007 A1
20070105600 Mohanty et al. May 2007 A1
20070161347 Ma et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070274294 Sasaki et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070281682 Raju et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080070601 Brueckheimer et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080090546 Dickinson et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080274734 Kostanic et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090016339 Tanizawa et al. Jan 2009 A1
20100013703 Tekawy et al. Jan 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
WO-0146822 Jun 2001 WO
WO-2006128946 Dec 2006 WO
WO-2008048742 Apr 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (46)
Entry
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 07/847,920, Final Office Action dated Aug. 22, 1995, No. of pages unknown.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 07/847,920, Final Office Action dated Mar. 21, 1996, No. of pages unknown; and corresponding response dated Mar. 27, 1996, No. of pages unknown.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 07/847,920, Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 27, 1995, No. of pages unknown; and corresponding response dated May 24, 1995, No. of pages unknown.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 07/847,920, Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 27, 1994, No. of pages unknown; and corresponding response dated May 31, 1994, No. of pages unknown; and supplemental response dated Sep. 20, 1994, No. of pages unknown.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 07/847,920, Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 30, 1993, No. of pages unknown; and corresponding response dated Oct. 26, 1993, No. of pages unknown.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 08/027,333, Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 24, 1994, No. of pages unknown; and corresponding response dated Dec. 22, 1994, No. of pages unknown.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 08/709,417, Final Office Action dated Jun. 11, 1998, No. of pages unknown; and corresponding response dated Aug. 3, 1998, No. of pages unknown.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 08/709,417, Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 18, 1998, No. of pages unknown; and corresponding response dated Apr. 20, 1998, No. of pages unknown.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 08/960,183, Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 5, 1999, No. of pages unknown.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 08/960,183, Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 5, 1999, No. of pages unknown; and corresponding response dated Dec. 6, 1999, No. of pages unknown.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 09/379,825, Non-Final Office Action dated May 11, 2001, No. of pages unknown; and corresponding response dated May 29, 2001, No. of pages unknown.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 09/686,923, Final Office Action dated Dec. 2, 2003, No. of pages unknown; and corresponding response dated Jan. 9, 2004, No. of pages unknown; and supplemental response dated Feb. 20, 2004, No. of pages unknown.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 09/686,923, Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2003, No. of pages unknown; and corresponding response dated Sep. 29, 2003, No. of pages unknown.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 10/730,329, Final Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2005, 16 pages; and corresponding response dated Jan. 25, 2006, 32 pages; supplemental response dated Feb. 17, 2006, 31 pages; supplemental response dated Feb. 17, 2006, 28 pages; supplemental response dated Mar. 27, 2006, 21 pages; and supplemental response dated Apr. 14, 2006, 21 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 10/730,329, Final Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2005, 16 pages; corresponding response dated Jan. 25, 2006, 32 pages; supplemental response dated Feb. 17, 2006, 31 pages; additional supplemental response dated Mar. 27, 2006, 21 pages; and additional supplemental response with RCE dated Apr. 14, 2006, 21 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 10/730,329, Non-Final Office Action dated May 18, 2005, 9 pages; and corresponding response dated Aug. 18, 2005, 34 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 11/492,545, Final Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2008, 18 pages; and corresponding response dated Jan. 27, 2009, 34 pages; and supplemental response dated Apr. 17, 2009, 35 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 11/492,545, Final Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2009, 19 pages; and corresponding response dated Feb. 9, 2010, 15 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 11/492,545, Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 7, 2008, 19 pages; and corresponding response dated Oct. 10, 2008, 29 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 11/492,545, Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2009, 20 pages; and corresponding response dated Sep. 3, 2009, 32 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,146, Final Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2009, 9 pages; and corresponding response dated May 29, 2009, 16 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,146, Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2008, 12 pages; and corresponding response dated Jan. 29, 2009, 13 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 12/021,133, Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2009, 14 pages; and corresponding response dated Sep. 9, 2009, 19 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 12/137,995, Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2011, 14 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,834, Final Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2009, 8 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,834, Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2011, 8 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,834, Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2009, 13 pages; and response dated Sep. 14, 2009, 11 pages.
Casewell, I.E.; “The Provision of GSM Cellular Radio Environments With Passenger Aircraft Operating Over Europe”; IEEE Fifth International Conference; Dec. 11-14, 1989; pp. 172-176.
International Search Report issued Jul. 17, 2009 in co-pending application PCT/US2009/042788.
Li et al.; “Airborne Operation of Portable Electronic Devices”; IEEE Antenna's and Propagation Magazine; vol. 44, No. 4; Aug. 2002; pp. 30-39.
Papavramidis et al.; “Adaptation of Land Mobile Systems for Onboard Operation”; IEEE Conference; 1993; pp. 258-263.
Uhlirz; “Concept of a GSM-based Communication System for High-Speed Trains”; 1994 IEEE 44th Vehicular Technology Conference; Stockholm; Jun. 8-10, 1994; pp. 1130-1134.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,146, Final Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2009, 18 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 11/590,146, Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2009, 16 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,645, Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2012, 10 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 12/137,995, Final Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2011, 17 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/009,579, Final Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2012, 7 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/009,579, Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2012, 6 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/009,687, Final Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2012, 8 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/009,687, Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2012, 5 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,564, Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2012, 8 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/227,634, Final Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2012, 7 pages.
In the US Patent and Trademark Office in re: U.S. Appl. No. 13/227,634, Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2011, 13 pages.
International Search Report issued Aug. 24, 2012, in co-pending application PCT/US2012/044266, 5 pages.
International Search Report issued Mar. 21, 2012, in co-pending application PCT/US2011/068110, 4 pages.
Nia et al.; “High Altitude Platform System (HAPS) and Co-existence with Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) in Frequency Range 5850-7075 MHz,” Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems Technology (Wireless Vitae), 2011 2nd International Conference, 2011; pp. 1-6.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110263199 A1 Oct 2011 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 10730329 Dec 2003 US
Child 11492545 US
Parent 13172539 US
Child 11492545 US
Parent 10730329 Dec 2003 US
Child 12423555 US
Continuation in Parts (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 12137995 Jun 2008 US
Child 13172539 US
Parent 11492545 Jul 2006 US
Child 12137995 US
Parent 12423555 Apr 2009 US
Child 13172539 US