Speed control for motor vehicles

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11440585
  • Patent Number
    11,440,585
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 18, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 13, 2022
    a year ago
  • CPC
  • Field of Search
    • CPC
    • B62D15/027
    • B62D13/06
    • B60L3/08
    • B60W50/02
    • B60W2520/22
    • B60W2300/145
    • B60W2300/14
    • B60G2400/97
    • B60T8/323
    • B60Y2300/28
    • B60Y2300/18033
    • B60D1/245
  • International Classifications
    • B62D15/02
    • B62D13/06
    • Disclaimer
      This patent is subject to a terminal disclaimer.
      Term Extension
      229
Abstract
A trailer backup assist system is provided herein. The trailer backup assist system includes a hitch angle sensor configured to determine a hitch angle between a vehicle and a trailer attached thereto. An input device is configured to accept an input command corresponding to a trailer path command curvature. A controller is configured to determine a vehicle threshold speed limit by determining a first vehicle speed limit based on the hitch angle and a second speed limit based on the command curvature. The controller generates a command to limit vehicle speed in a reverse direction below the threshold speed limit.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to systems for controlling/assisting vehicles during backup operations, and in particular to a system that controls vehicle speed during parking and/or trailer backup operations.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Backing up a vehicle with a trailer can be a difficult task. In conventional motor vehicles, the operator must control the steering and vehicle speed while the vehicle is moving in reverse. Trailer backup assist systems have been developed to assist operators when backing up a vehicle having a trailer attached thereto.


Motor vehicles may also include active park assist systems that assist a driver during vehicle parking operations. Such systems may be configured to provide automated parking. During parking operations, the vehicle may be moved in a reverse direction.


The path that a vehicle is capable of following in reverse is limited by the design of the vehicle and trailer (if present), and road conditions. Furthermore, the path that a vehicle (and trailer) is capable of in a reverse direction may be more limited at higher vehicle speeds.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to one aspect of the present invention, a trailer backup assist system is disclosed. The trailer backup assist system includes a hitch angle sensor configured to determine a hitch angle between a vehicle and a trailer attached thereto. An input device is configured to accept an input command corresponding to a trailer path command curvature. A controller is configured to determine a vehicle threshold speed limit by determining a first vehicle speed limit based on the hitch angle and a second speed limit based on the command curvature. The controller generates a command to limit vehicle speed in a reverse direction below the threshold speed limit.


According to another aspect of the present invention, a trailer backup assist system is disclosed. The trailer backup assist system includes a hitch angle sensor sensing a hitch angle between a vehicle and a trailer attached thereto. An input device is configured to accept a trailer path command curvature. A controller is configured to determine a maximum allowable vehicle threshold speed limit in a reverse direction as a function of the hitch angle and the desired trailer curvature.


According to yet another aspect of the present invention, a method of controlling a speed of a motor vehicle is disclosed. The method includes determining a hitch angle between a vehicle and a trailer attached to the vehicle. Next, a trailer curvature command is determined based on an input device input magnitude. A first vehicle speed limit based on the hitch angle is calculated. A second speed limit based on the trailer path curvature command is calculated. A threshold speed limit based on the first and second speed limits is then determined.


These and other aspects, objects, and features of the present invention will be understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art upon studying the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the drawings:



FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of a vehicle attached to a trailer with one embodiment of a hitch angle sensor for operating a trailer backup assist system;



FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a motor vehicle including a trailer backup assist system according to one embodiment;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of the trailer backup assist system having a input device, a curvature controller, and a vehicle braking system;



FIG. 4 is a fragmentary view of a portion of a vehicle interior including an auxiliary steering input that can be utilized by a vehicle operator when the vehicle is backing up with a trailer attached thereto;



FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram that illustrates the geometry of a vehicle and a trailer overlaid with a two-dimensional x-y coordinate system, identifying variables used to determine a kinematic relationship of the vehicle and the trailer for the trailer backup assist system, according to one embodiment;



FIG. 6 is a schematic plan view of a motor vehicle and a trailer at various positions along a vehicle path;



FIG. 7 is a graph showing maximum allowable vehicle speed versus hitch angle;



FIG. 8 is a graph showing maximum allowable vehicle speed versus desired input command;



FIG. 9 is a schematic block diagram illustrating portions of a curvature controller, according to an additional embodiment, and other components of the trailer backup assist system, according to such an embodiment;



FIG. 10 is a flow chart of the curvature controller of FIG. 9, showing the signal flow of the curvature controller, according to such an embodiment; and



FIG. 11. is a flow chart of the curvature controller of FIG. 9, showing the signal flow of the curvature controller, according to such an embodiment, wherein the controller sets a plurality of speed limits, filters, and compares the speed limits to determine a threshold speed limit.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

For purposes of description herein, the terms “upper,” “lower,” “right,” “left,” “rear,” “front,” “vertical,” “horizontal,” and derivatives thereof shall relate to the invention as oriented in FIG. 1. However, it is to be understood that the invention may assume various alternative orientations and step sequences, except where expressly specified to the contrary. It is also to be understood that the specific devices and processes illustrated in the attached drawings, and described in the following specification, are simply exemplary embodiments of the inventive concepts defined in the appended claims. Hence, specific dimensions and other physical characteristics relating to the embodiments disclosed herein are not to be considered as limiting, unless the claims expressly state otherwise.


As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein. However, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to a detailed design and some schematics may be exaggerated or minimized to show function overview. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention.


As used herein, the term “and/or,” when used in a list of two or more items, means that any one of the listed items can be employed by itself, or any combination of two or more of the listed items can be employed. For example, if a composition is described as containing components A, B, and/or C, the composition can contain A alone; B alone; C alone; A and B in combination; A and C in combination; B and C in combination; or A, B, and C in combination.


Referring to FIGS. 1-11, reference numeral 10 generally designates a trailer backup assist system for controlling a backing path of a trailer 12 attached to a vehicle 14 by allowing a driver of the vehicle 14 to specify a desired command curvature κ2 or backing path 16 of the trailer 12. In one embodiment, the trailer backup assist system 10 automatically steers the vehicle 14 to guide the trailer 12 on the desired curvature κ2 as a driver uses the accelerator and/or brake pedals to control the reversing speed of the vehicle 14. In addition, the trailer backup assist system 10 may include an input device 18, such as a rotatable knob 20, for a driver to provide a desired rotational angle that is correlated to a corresponding desired command curvature κ2 of the trailer 12. To monitor the position of the trailer 12 relative to the vehicle 14, the trailer backup assist system 10 may include a sensor system 22 that senses a hitch angle γ between the trailer 12 and the vehicle 14, which may be generally referred to as a hitch angle sensor 24. To avoid unacceptable trailer backup conditions, such as a jackknife condition, the hitch angle γ and desired command curvature κ2 may be monitored and processed. A first vehicle speed limit may be generated based on the hitch angle γ and a second vehicle speed limit may be generated based on the desired command curvature κ2 for assisting in the prevention of unacceptable backup conditions. A controller 26 may filter the first and second speed limits and calculate a threshold speed limit based on the two inputted speed limits. The vehicle threshold speed limit may be the speed limit at which the vehicle 14 operates for assisting in the mitigation of unacceptable backup conditions. For example, according to one embodiment, the controller 26 may set the vehicle threshold speed limit at the minimum of the first and second speed limits during some phases of the backup process.


With reference to the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the vehicle 14 is a pickup truck that is equipped with one embodiment of the trailer backup assist system 10 for controlling the backing path of the trailer 12 that is attached to the vehicle 14. Specifically, the vehicle 14 is pivotally attached to one embodiment of the trailer 12 that has a box frame 28 with an enclosed cargo area 30, a single axle 32 having a right wheel assembly 34a and a left wheel assembly 34b, and a tongue 36 longitudinally extending forward from the enclosed cargo area 30. The illustrated trailer 12 also has a trailer hitch connector in the form of a coupler assembly 38 that is connected to a vehicle hitch connector in the form of a hitch ball 40. The coupler assembly 38 latches onto the hitch ball 40 to provide a pivoting ball joint connection 42 that allows for articulation of the hitch angle γ. It should be appreciated that additional embodiments of the trailer 12 may alternatively couple with the vehicle 14 to provide a pivoting connection, such as by connecting with a fifth wheel connector. It is also contemplated that additional embodiments of the trailer 12 may include more than one axle 32 and may have various shapes and sizes configured for different loads and items, such as a boat trailer or a flatbed trailer.


Still referring to FIG. 1, the sensor system 22, in the illustrated embodiment, includes both a sensor module 44 and a vision-based hitch angle sensor 24 for estimating the hitch angle γbetween the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12. The illustrated hitch angle sensor 24 employs a camera 46 (e.g., video imaging camera) that may be located proximate an upper region of the vehicle tailgate 48 at the rear portion of the vehicle 14, as shown, such that the camera 46 may be elevated relative to the tongue 36 of the trailer 12. The illustrated camera 46 has an imaging field of view 50 located and oriented to capture one or more images of the trailer 12, including a region containing one or more desired target placement zones for at least one target 52 to be secured. Although it is contemplated that the camera 46 may capture images of the trailer 12 without a target 52 to determine the hitch angle γ, in the illustrated embodiment, the trailer backup assist system 10 includes a target 52 placed on the trailer 12 to allow the trailer backup assist system 10 to utilize information acquired via image acquisition and processing of the target 52. For instance, the illustrated camera 46 may include a video imaging camera that repeatedly captures successive images of the trailer 12 that may be processed to identify the target 52 and its location on the trailer 12 for determining movement of the target 52 and the trailer 12 relative to the vehicle 14 and the corresponding hitch angle γ. It should also be appreciated that the camera 46 may include one or more video imaging cameras and may be located at other locations on the vehicle 14 to acquire images of the trailer 12 and the desired target placement zone, such as on a passenger cab of the vehicle 14 to capture images of a gooseneck trailer. Furthermore, it is contemplated that additional embodiments of the hitch angle sensor 24 and the sensor system 22 for providing the hitch angle γ may include one or a combination of a potentiometer, a magnetic-based sensor, an optical sensor, a proximity sensor, a rotational sensor, a capacitive sensor, an inductive sensor, or a mechanical based sensor, such as a mechanical sensor assembly mounted to the pivoting ball joint connection 42, energy transducers of a reverse aid system, a blind spot system, and/or a cross traffic alert system, and other conceivable sensors or indicators of the hitch angle γ to supplement or be used in place of the vision-based hitch angle sensor 24.


The embodiment of the sensor module 44 illustrated in FIG. 1 includes a housed sensor cluster 54 mounted on the tongue 36 of the trailer 12 proximate the enclosed cargo area 30 and includes left and right wheel speed sensors 56 on laterally opposing wheels of the trailer 12. It is conceivable that the wheel speed sensors 56 may be bi-directional wheel speed sensors 56 for monitoring both forward and reverse speeds. Also, it is contemplated that the sensor cluster 54, in additional embodiments, may be mounted on alternative portions of the trailer 12 and/or the vehicle 14.


The sensor module 44 generates a plurality of signals indicative of various dynamics of the trailer 12. The signals may include a yaw rate signal, a lateral acceleration signal, and wheel speed signals generated respectively by a yaw rate sensor 58 (FIG. 3), an accelerometer 60 (FIG. 3), and the wheel speed sensors 56. Accordingly, in the illustrated embodiment, the yaw rate sensor 58 and the accelerometer 60 are contained within the housed sensor cluster 54, although other configurations are conceivable. It is conceivable that the accelerometer 60, in some embodiments, may be two or more separate sensors and may be arranged at an offset angle, such as two sensors arranged at plus and minus forty-five degrees from the longitudinal direction of the trailer 12 or arranged parallel with the longitudinal and lateral directions of the trailer 12, to generate a more robust acceleration signal. It is also contemplated that these sensor signals could be compensated and filtered to remove offsets or drifts, and smooth out noise. Further, the controller 26 (FIG. 3) may utilize processed signals received outside of the sensor system 22, including standard signals from the brake control system 62 (FIG. 3) and the power assist steering system 64 (FIG. 3), such as vehicle yaw rate ω1, vehicle speed v1, and steering angle δ, to estimate the trailer hitch angle γ, trailer speed, and related trailer parameters. As described in more detail below, the controller 26 may estimate the hitch angle γ based on the trailer yaw rate ω2, the vehicle yaw rate ω1, and the vehicle speed v1 in view of a kinematic relationship between the trailer 12 and the vehicle 14. The controller 26 of the trailer backup assist system 10 may also utilize the estimated trailer variables and trailer parameters to control the steering system 64, brake control system 62, and the powertrain control system 66 (FIG. 3), such as to assist backing the vehicle 14 and trailer 12 combination or to mitigate an unacceptable backup condition.


With reference to FIG. 2, the trailer backup assist system 10, according to one embodiment, includes the trailer backup input device 18 that is operably connected to a trailer backup assist controller 26. The trailer backup assist system 10 further includes the hitch angle sensor 24 that is operably connected to the trailer backup assist controller 26.


The trailer backup assist controller 26 is operably connected to a brake control system 62 and a power control system 66. The vehicle 14 also includes a power steering assist system 64 including a power assist steering control module 68 and a steering angle sensor 70. The power assist steering control module 68 is operably connected to the trailer backup assist controller 26. The trailer 12 may include a hitch angle sensor 24 that is operably connected to the hitch angle sensor 24 of vehicle 14.


The hitch angle sensor 24 is configured to measure the angle of the trailer 12 relative to the vehicle 14 about a vertical axis. A hitch angle γ of zero generally corresponds to an operating condition wherein the trailer 12 is aligned with vehicle 14 such that the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12 move along a straight path. The hitch angle sensor 24 may also be configured to measure an orientation of the trailer 12 relative to the vehicle 14 about a first horizontal axis that extends side-to-side, and a second horizontal axis that extends in a vehicle 14 fore-aft direction. This enables the trailer backup assist system 10 to determine if the trailer 12 has begun to move up a slope and/or if the trailer 12 has twisted relative to vehicle 14 due to moving onto a surface that is sloped to the side. It will be understood that various hitch angle detection/measuring devices may be utilized, and the components may be mounted on vehicle 14, on trailer 12, or on both.


With reference to the embodiment of the trailer backup assist system 10 shown in FIG. 3, the hitch angle sensor 24 provides the sensed hitch angle γ to the trailer backup assist system 10. Similarly, the illustrated embodiment of the trailer backup assist system 10 receives vehicle status-related information from additional sensors and devices. This information includes positioning information from a positioning device 74, which may include a global positioning system (GPS) on the vehicle 14 or a handled device, to determine a coordinate location of the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12 based on the location of the positioning device 74 with respect to the trailer 12 and/or the vehicle 14 and based on the sensed hitch angle γ. The positioning device 74 may additionally or alternatively include a dead reckoning system for determining the coordinate location of the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12 within a localized coordinate system based at least on vehicle speed, steering angle, and hitch angle γ. Other vehicle information received by the trailer backup assist system 10 may include a speed of the vehicle 14 from speed sensors 78 and a yaw rate of the vehicle 14 from a yaw sensor 80. It is contemplated that in additional embodiments the hitch angle sensor 24 and other vehicle sensors 76 and devices may provide sensor signals or other information, such as proximity sensor signals or successive images of the trailer 12, that a controller 26 of the trailer backup assist system 10 may process with various routines to determine a value or an indicator, such as a hitch angle γ value or a range of hitch angles.


As further shown in FIG. 3, one embodiment of the trailer backup assist system 10 is in communication with a power assist steering system 64 of the vehicle 14 to operate steered wheels 82 (FIG. 1) of the vehicle 14 for moving the vehicle 14 in such a manner that the trailer 12 reacts in accordance with the desired command curvature κ2 of the trailer 12. In the illustrated embodiment, the power assist steering system 64 is an electric power-assisted steering (EPAS) system that includes an electric steering motor 84 for turning the steered wheels 82 to a steering angle based on a steering command, whereby the steering angle is sensed by a steering angle sensor 70 of the power assist steering system 64. The steering command may be provided by the trailer backup assist system 10 for autonomously steering during a backup maneuver and may alternatively be provided manually via a rotational position (e.g., steering wheel angle) of a steering wheel 86 (FIG. 1). However, in the illustrated embodiment, the steering wheel 86 of the vehicle 14 is mechanically coupled with the steered wheels 82 of the vehicle 14, such that the steering wheel 86 moves in concert with steered wheels 82, preventing manual intervention with the steering wheel 86 during autonomous steering. More specifically, a torque sensor 88 is provided on the power assist steering system 64 that senses torque on the steering wheel 86 that is not expected from autonomous control of the steering wheel 86 and therefore indicative of manual intervention, whereby the trailer backup assist system 10 may alert the driver to discontinue manual intervention with the steering wheel 86 and/or discontinue autonomous steering.


In alternative embodiments, some vehicles 14 have a power assist steering system 64 that allows a steering wheel 86 to be partially decoupled from movement of the steered wheels 82 of such a vehicle 14. Accordingly, the steering wheel 86 can be rotated independent of the manner in which the power assist steering system 64 of the vehicle controls the steered wheels 82 (e.g., autonomous steering as commanded by the trailer backup assist system 10). As such, in these types of vehicles 14 where the steering wheel 86 can be selectively decoupled from the steered wheels 82 to allow independent operation thereof, the steering wheel 86 may be used as a input device 18 for the trailer backup assist system 10, as disclosed in greater detail herein.


Referring again to the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3, the power assist steering system 64 provides the controller 26 of the trailer backup assist system 10 with information relating to a rotational position of steered wheels 82 of the vehicle 14, including a steering angle. The controllers 26 in the illustrated embodiment process the current steering angle, in addition to other vehicle 14 and trailer 12 conditions to guide the trailer 12 along the desired command curvature κ2. It is conceivable that the trailer backup assist system 10, in additional embodiments, may be an integrated component of the power assist steering system 64. For example, the power assist steering system 64 may include a trailer backup assist algorithm for generating vehicle steering information and commands as a function of all or a portion of information received from the input device 18, the hitch angle sensor 24, the power assist steering system 64, a vehicle brake control system 62, a powertrain control system 66, and other vehicle sensors 76 and devices.


As also illustrated in FIG. 3, the vehicle brake control system 62 may also communicate with the controller 26 to provide the trailer backup assist system 10 with braking information, such as wheel speed, and to receive braking commands from the controller 26. For instance, vehicle speed information can be determined from individual wheel speeds as monitored by the brake control system 62. Vehicle speed may also be determined from the powertrain control system 66, the speed sensors 78, and the positioning device 74, among other conceivable means. In some embodiments, individual wheel speeds can also be used to determine a vehicle yaw rate, which can be provided to the trailer backup assist system 10 in the alternative or in addition to the yaw sensor 80, for use in determining the vehicle steering commands. In certain embodiments, the trailer backup assist system 10 can provide vehicle braking information to the brake control system 62 for allowing the trailer backup assist system 10 to control braking of the vehicle 14 during backing of the trailer 12. For example, the trailer backup assist system 10 in some embodiments may regulate speed of the vehicle 14 during backing of the trailer 12, which can reduce the potential for unacceptable trailer backup conditions. Examples of unacceptable trailer backup conditions include, but are not limited to, a vehicle 14 over speed condition, a high hitch angle rate (i.e., the change in hitch angle over time), hitch angle γ dynamic instability, a calculated theoretical trailer jackknife condition (defined by a maximum vehicle steering angle, drawbar length, tow vehicle wheelbase, and an effective trailer length), or physical contact jackknife limitation (defined by an angular displacement limit relative to the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12), and the like. The trailer backup assist system 10 can also issue a warning signal corresponding to a notification of an actual, impending, and/or anticipated unacceptable trailer backup condition, as disclosed in greater detail herein.


The powertrain control system 66, as shown in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3, may also interact with the trailer backup assist system 10 for regulating speed and acceleration of the vehicle 14 during backing of the trailer 12. As mentioned above, regulation of the speed of the vehicle 14 may be necessary to limit the potential for unacceptable trailer backup conditions such as, for example, jackknifing and hitch angle γ dynamic instability. Similar to high-speed considerations as they relate to unacceptable trailer backup conditions, high acceleration, and high dynamic driver desired command curvatures κ2 can also lead to such unacceptable trailer backup conditions.


With continued reference to FIG. 3, the trailer backup assist system 10 in the illustrated embodiment may communicate with one or more devices including vehicle warning devices 90 that may be used to alert the driver of the vehicle in a variety of forms. For instance, the vehicle warning devices 90 may utilize the generated warning signal to prompt visual, auditory, and tactile warnings. As such, the vehicle warning devices 90 may include lights 92, such as exterior brake lights and vehicle emergency flashers, as well as interior dash lights and mirror lights. Also, with respect to auditory warnings, the vehicle warning devices 90 may include a vehicle horn 94 and/or a speaker 96 within the vehicle 14. Additionally, the trailer backup assist system 10 may communicate warnings and other information with a human machine interface (HMI) 98 for the vehicle 14 including a vehicle display 100, such as a center stack mounted navigation/entertainment display (FIG. 1). With respect to a tactile or haptic warning, the vehicle warning devices 90 may include a variety of equipment, such as the input device 18, a driver's seat, and/or other vehicle devices. Further, the trailer backup assist system 10 may communicate via wireless communication with another embodiment of the HMI 98, such as with one or more handheld or portable devices, including one or more smartphones. The portable device may also include the display 100 for displaying one or more images and other information to a user. For instance, the portable device may display one or more images of the trailer 12 and the target location within a desired target placement zone on display. In addition, the portable device may provide feedback information, such as audible and tactile warnings.


As further illustrated in FIG. 3, the trailer backup assist system 10 includes an input device 18 that is connected to the controller 26 for allowing communication of information therebetween. It is disclosed herein that the input device 18 can be coupled to the controller 26 in a wired or wireless manner. The input device 18 provides the trailer backup assist system 10 with information defining the desired backing path 16 of travel of the trailer 12 for the controller 26 to process and generate steering commands. Namely, the input device 18 accepts an inputted input command based on a desired trailer curvature that is inputted through the input device 18 and, in response, provides a desired curvature κ2 of travel of the trailer 12. Also, the trailer steering commands can include information relating to a commanded change in the path of travel, such as a change in radius of the backing path 16 (e.g., the curvature) and information relating to an indication that the trailer 12 is to travel along a path defined by a longitudinal centerline axis of the trailer 12 (i.e., along a substantially straight path of travel or zero curvature). As will be discussed below in more detail, the input device 18 according to the illustrated embodiment may include the input device 18 for selecting the longitudinal direction of the trailer 12, the longitudinal direction of the vehicle 14, or the curvature based on the present hitch angle γ.


The input device 18 in the illustrated embodiment may additionally, or alternatively, include a rotational control input device for allowing a driver of the vehicle 14 to command desired trailer steering actions or otherwise select the desired input command and/or the desired curvature κ2. For instance, the rotational control input device may be a rotatable knob 20, which can be rotatable about a rotational axis extending through a top surface or face of the knob 20. In other embodiments, the rotatable knob 20 may be rotatable about a rotational axis extending substantially parallel to a top surface or face of the rotatable knob 20. Furthermore, the input device 18, according to additional embodiments, may include alternative devices for providing a desired input command or other information defining a desired backing path 16, such as a joystick, depressible buttons, sliding input devices, various controls on a portable device, various user interfaces on a touch-screen display, vision-based systems for receiving gestures, a trajectory planner or other programmable route system, and other conceivable input devices as generally understood by one having ordinary skill in the art.


Still referring to the embodiment shown in FIG. 3, the controller 26 is configured with a microprocessor 102 to process logic and routines stored in memory 104 that receive information from the input device 18, the hitch angle sensor 24, the power assist steering system 64, the vehicle brake control system 62, the powertrain control system 66, and other vehicle sensors 76 and devices. As recited above, the controller 26 may process the hitch angle and related information from the hitch angle sensor 24 or other input to generate a warning signal with enough time for the driver to respond to an unacceptable trailer backup condition. Examples of unacceptable trailer backup conditions include, but are not limited to, an over speed condition, a high hitch angle rate, hitch angle γ dynamic instability, a calculated theoretical trailer jackknife condition, a physical contact jackknife limitation, the trailer 12 or the vehicle 14 approaching physical contact with an object, and the like. It is disclosed herein that the trailer backup assist system 10 can issue an alert signal corresponding to a notification of an actual, impending, and/or anticipated unacceptable trailer backup condition.


The controller 26 may additionally or alternatively generate vehicle steering information and commands as a function of all or a portion of the information received from the input device 18, the hitch angle sensor 24, the power assist steering system 64, the vehicle brake control system 62, the trailer braking system, the powertrain control system 66, and other vehicle sensors 76 and devices. Thereafter, the vehicle steering information and commands may be provided to the power assist steering system 64 for affecting steering of the vehicle 14 to achieve a commanded path of travel for the trailer 12. The controller 26 may include the microprocessor 102 and/or other analog and/or digital circuitry for processing one or more routines. Also, the controller 26 may include the memory 104 for storing one or more routines, including a curvature routine 106, an operating routine 108, and a hitch angle estimating routine 110. It should be appreciated that the controller 26 may be a stand-alone dedicated controller or may be a shared controller integrated with other control functions, such as integrated with the sensor system 22, the power assist steering system 64, and other conceivable onboard or off-board vehicle control systems.


With reference to FIG. 4, an input device 18, such as a rotatable knob 20, may be mounted to a vehicle interior component such as a center console 112. Upon activation of the trailer backup assist system 10, a user can rotate knob 20 to provide a user steering request, or input command, to the power steering assist system 64. During vehicle backup operations, a user can utilize the knob 20 to provide steering input rather than rotating the vehicle steering wheel. More specifically, the angular position of the rotatable knob 20 may correlate to a desired command curvature κ2, such that rotation of the knob 20 to a different angular position provides a different desired curvature κ2 with an incremental change based on the magnitude of rotation. As discussed in more detail below, the trailer backup assist system 10 may be configured to generate steering command signals to change the wheel angle of the steered wheels. The steering command signals may be directly proportional to the user steering request, or the system may override or modify the steering request to generate steering command signals. The rotatable knob 20 may be biased (e.g., by a spring return) to a center or at-rest position P(AR) between opposing rotational ranges of motion R(R), R(L).


With further reference to FIG. 4, a first opposing rotational range of motion R(R) is substantially equal to a second opposing rotational range of motion R(L). To provide a tactile indication of an amount of rotation of the rotatable knob 20, a force that biases the knob 20 toward the at-rest position P(AR) can increase (e.g., non-linearly) as a function of the amount of rotation of the rotatable knob 20 with respect to the at-rest position P(AR). Additionally, the rotatable knob 20 can be configured with position indicating detents such that the driver can positively feel the at-rest position P(AR) and feel the ends of the opposing rotational ranges of motion R(L), R(R) approaching (e.g., soft end stops). The input device knob 20 and operation thereof is described in detail in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/813,642, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,023,229, entitled “MULTI-MODE TRAILER BACKUP ASSIST INTERFACE KNOB,” filed Jul. 30, 2015, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.


With reference to FIG. 5, a kinematic relationship between a curvature of a path of travel of the trailer 12 and the steering angle of the vehicle 14 towing the trailer 12 can be determined for a trailer backup assist system 10 configured in accordance with some embodiments, including for use by the curvature routine 106 of the controller 26 in one embodiment. To achieve such a kinematic relationship, certain assumptions may be made with regard to parameters associated with the vehicle 14 and trailer 12 system. Examples of such assumptions include, but are not limited to, the trailer 12 being backed by the vehicle 14 at a relatively low speed, wheels of the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12 having negligible (e.g., no) slip, tires of the vehicle 14 having negligible (e.g., no) lateral compliance, tires of the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12 having negligible (e.g., no) deformation, actuator dynamics of the vehicle 14 being negligible, and the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12 exhibiting negligible (e.g., no) roll or pitch motions, among other conceivable factors with the potential to have an effect on controlling the trailer 12 with the vehicle 14.


As shown in FIG. 5, for a trailer backup assist system 10 defined by a vehicle 14 and a trailer 12, the kinematic relationship is based on various parameters associated with the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12. These parameters include:


δ: steering angle at steered front wheels of the vehicle;


α: yaw angle of the vehicle;


β: yaw angle of the trailer;


γ: hitch angle (γ=β−α);


W: wheel base of the vehicle;


L: length between hitch point and rear axle of the vehicle;


D: distance between hitch point and axle of the trailer or effective axle for a multiple axle trailer (axle length may be an equivalent); and


r2: curvature radius for the trailer.


One embodiment of a kinematic relationship between trailer path radius of curvature r2 at the midpoint of an axle of the trailer 12, steering angle δ of the steered wheels 82 of the vehicle 14, and the hitch angle γ can be expressed in the equation provided below. As such, if the hitch angle γ is provided, the trailer path curvature κ2 can be controlled based on regulating the steering angle δ (where {dot over (β)} is trailer yaw rate and {dot over (η)} is trailer velocity).







κ
2

=


1

r
2


=



β
.


η
.







(

W
+


KV
2

g


)


sin





γ

+

L





cos





γ





tan





δ



D


(



(

W
+


KV
2

g


)


cos





γ

-

L





sin





γtan





δ


)









This relationship can be expressed to provide the steering angle δ as a function of trailer path curvature κ2 and hitch angle γ.






δ
=



tan

-
1


(



(

W
+


KV
2

g


)



[



κ
2


D





cos





γ

-

sin





γ


]




DL






κ
2


sin





γ

+

L





cos





γ



)

=

F
(

γ
,

κ
2

,
K

)






Accordingly, for a particular vehicle 14 and trailer 12 combination, certain parameters (e.g., D, W and L) of the kinematic relationship are constant and assumed known. V is the vehicle longitudinal speed and g is the acceleration due to gravity. K is a speed dependent parameter which when set to zero makes the calculation of steering angle independent of vehicle speed. For example, vehicle-specific parameters of the kinematic relationship can be predefined in an electronic control system of the vehicle 14 and trailer-specific parameters of the kinematic relationship can be inputted by a driver of the vehicle 14, determined from sensed trailer behavior in response to vehicle steering commands, or otherwise determined from signals provided by the trailer 12. Trailer path curvature κ2 is determined from the driver input via the input device 18. Through the use of the equation for providing steering angle, a corresponding steering command can be generated by the curvature routine 106 for controlling the power assist steering system 64 of the vehicle 14. Additionally, the controller 26 based on the driver's manipulation of the input device 18 may also predict an unacceptable backup condition. Accordingly, the trailer backup assist system 10 may set a desired command curvature κ2 speed limit based on the rotation on the manipulation of the input device 18 to assist in preventing unacceptable backup conditions.


Still referring to FIG. 5, the memory of the controller 26 may include look-up tables (LUTs) that include a correlation between desired command curvature κ2 and the time to reach the desired command curvature κ2. Accordingly, the controller 26 may predict an unacceptable backup condition, such as a jackknife condition, prior to the trailer 12 reaching the specific situation. Thus, the controller 26 may set a maximum desired command curvature speed limit as the user input device 18 input magnitude is varied based on a value within the LUT such that the jackknife condition may be prevented. Reducing the maximum vehicle speed based on the desired command curvature κ2 may also reduce noise during usage of the trailer backup assist system 10.


In an additional embodiment, an assumption may be made by the curvature routine 106 that a longitudinal distance L between the pivoting connection and the rear axle of the vehicle 14 is equal to zero for purposes of operating the trailer backup assist system 10 when a gooseneck trailer or other similar trailer is connected with the a hitch ball or a fifth wheel connector located over a rear axle of the vehicle 14. The assumption essentially assumes that the pivoting connection with the trailer is substantially vertically aligned with the rear axle of the vehicle 14. When such an assumption is made, the controller 26 may generate the steering angle command for the vehicle 14 as a function independent of the longitudinal distance L between the pivoting connection and the rear axle of the vehicle 14. It is appreciated that the gooseneck trailer mentioned generally refers to the tongue 36 configuration being elevated to attach with the vehicle 14 at an elevated location over the rear axle, such as within a bed of a truck, whereby embodiments of the gooseneck trailer may include flatbed cargo areas, enclosed cargo areas, campers, cattle trailers, horse trailers, lowboy trailers, and other conceivable trailers with such a tongue configuration.


With reference to FIG. 6, the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12 move along a path 122 that may include a portion 122a having a smaller radius, and a portion 122b that is substantially straight, or has a large radius. The hitch angle γ is zero when path 122 is straight, and increases as the radius of the path portion 122a decreases. Thus, the hitch angle γ between vehicle 14 and trailer 12 will be greater in the path portions 122a than the relatively straight path portions 122b. The trailer backup assist system 10 may be configured to limit the speed of vehicle 14 and trailer 12 during backup to a maximum speed. For example, when the operator actuates the trailer backup assist system 10 and utilizes the input device knob 20 (FIG. 4), the trailer backup assist system 10 may limit the speed of vehicle 14 to 7 kilometers per hour (kph), even when the hitch angle γ is zero degrees and the vehicle 14 and trailer 12 are moving along a straight portion 122b of path 122. However, according to one embodiment, if the vehicle 14 and trailer 12 are following a portion 122a of path 122 having a relatively small radius of curvature, thereby creating a larger hitch angle γ, the speed of the vehicle 14 may be limited by the trailer backup assist system 10 to a speed that is less than 7 kph to ensure that control is maintained and to avoid jackknifing.


The trailer backup assist system 10 may be configured to set a vehicle threshold speed limit in reverse when a trailer 12 is attached to vehicle 14 to ensure that vehicle 14 can be controlled and to prevent jackknifing or other unacceptable backup conditions. FIG. 7 illustrates various ways to map maximum allowable vehicle speed as a function of hitch angle γ. FIG. 8 illustrates various ways to map maximum allowable vehicle speed as a function of desired command curvature κ2. As described herein, both speed limits may be monitored in conjunction with one another by the controller 26 to determine a vehicle threshold speed limit.


In use, the hitch angle γ can be measured while the vehicle 14 is backing up, and the trailer backup assist system 10 limits the vehicle speed using, for example, the vehicle brakes or drivetrain such that the vehicle 14 does not exceed the maximum allowable speed even if a vehicle operator attempts to back up at a higher speed by depressing the accelerator pedal.


With reference to FIG. 7, line 124 represents a maximum allowable vehicle speed at different hitch angles γ. In the illustrated example, the line 124 is a straight line, and the maximum vehicle speed at a hitch angle γ of 0° is 10 kph, and the maximum allowable vehicle speed is reduced to 3 kph at a hitch angle γ of 70°. It will be understood that the maximum vehicle speed may be reduced to 3 kph at a lower hitch angle γ (e.g. 60°) as shown by the line 126. Moreover, it will also be appreciated that the vehicle may be slowed to a speed below 3 kph in some embodiments. For example, the vehicle may come to a stop when the hitch angle γ approaches to great of an angle to prevent a jack-knife condition.


As shown by the line 128, the maximum vehicle speed may not be limited to a speed that is below 7 kph until a hitch angle γ of significantly greater than 0° (e.g. 30°) is reached, and the maximum vehicle speed may then be limited by a straight line that goes to 0 at a predefined hitch angle γ (e.g. 60°). In FIG. 7, the line 128 includes a segment 128a that is horizontal until the hitch angle γ reaches 30°, and the maximum allowable vehicle speed then transitions linearly to 3 kph as shown by the line segment 128b. The maximum allowable vehicle speed as a function of the hitch angle γ may also be non-linear (e.g. parabolic) as shown by the dashed lines 130 and 132.


The maximum allowable vehicle speed for a given hitch angle γ may be determined empirically to provide a plurality of pairs of data points, and the data may be interpolated utilizing a curve fit to thereby generate a line representing the maximum allowable vehicle speed as a function of the hitch angle γ, which may be stored in an LUT. Alternatively, the maximum allowable vehicle speed as a function of a hitch angle γ may be modeled utilizing a straight (linear) line of the form y=mx+b, or a curved (non-linear) line of the form y=mx2+cx+b, or other suitable equation.


The trailer backup assist system 10 may also take into account other variables to determine the maximum allowable vehicle speed based on hitch angle γ for a given operating condition. For example, the curves (e.g., 124, 128) illustrated in FIG. 7 may be modified to account for hill angles. Specifically, if the vehicle 14 and trailer 12 are backing up a hill, the maximum allowable vehicle speed may be reduced for a given (measured) hitch angle γ. The hill angle may be measured utilizing a gravity sensor on board vehicle 14, or it may be measured utilizing a sensor in the coupler assembly 38 (FIG. 1) interconnecting vehicle 14 and trailer 12. Additional variables such as road conditions may also be utilized to adjust the maximum allowable vehicle speed at a given hitch angle γ. For example, the vehicle 14 may include sensors that enable the trailer backup assist system 10 to determine if the vehicle 14 is on loose gravel, wet pavement, or other surface having reduced traction. If the vehicle 14 and/or trailer 12 are on a gravel or wet surface, the maximum allowable vehicle speed for a given hitch angle γ may be further reduced to ensure that the operator can maintain control of the trailer 12 during the backup operations.


Also, the hill angle may be determined utilizing topographical information that may be stored by the trailer backup assist system 10 or obtained utilizing a GPS system. Vehicle 14 may include an electronic compass or other positioning device 74 whereby the location and orientation of vehicle 14 on a topographical map may be determined, such that the hill angle of the vehicle 14 and trailer 12 can be determined.


Also, road condition data can be obtained from a remote source, and the maximum allowable vehicle speed can be adjusted if required. For example, if weather data in the vicinity of vehicle 14 indicates that it is raining or snowing, the maximum allowable vehicle speed for a given (measured) hitch angle γ may be reduced to account for the decrease in traction. Similarly, map data concerning the road surface (e.g. gravel or paved road) may be utilized to adjust the maximum allowable vehicle speed as a function of hitch angle γ.


With reference to FIG. 8, line 134 represents a maximum allowable vehicle speed at different magnitudes of the input device 18. In the illustrated example, the line 134 is a straight line, and the maximum vehicle speed at a hitch angle γ of 0° is 7 kph, and the maximum allowable vehicle speed is reduced to 3 kph at a hitch angle γ of 70°, or any other desired speed and/or a stopped condition, as described above. Also, as described above and shown by the line 140a, the maximum vehicle speed may not be significantly limited to speed that is below 7 kph until a input magnitude that is significantly greater than 0° (e.g. 60°) is reached, and the maximum allowable vehicle speed then transitions parabolicly to 0 as shown by the line segment 140b. The maximum allowable vehicle speed as a function of the input magnitude of the input device 18 might also be linear in alternate embodiments.


The maximum allowable vehicle speed for a given input magnitude may be determined empirically to provide a plurality of pairs of data points, and the data may be interpolated utilizing a curve fit to thereby generate a line representing the maximum allowable vehicle speed as a function of the input magnitude. Alternatively, the maximum allowable vehicle speed as a function of the input magnitude of the input device 18 may be modeled utilizing a straight line, or a curved line, or other suitable equation, as described above.


In operation, a user activates the trailer backup assist system 10, and begins to back up the vehicle 14 and trailer 12. The user utilizes the input device 18 to provide the desired command curvature κ2 to the trailer backup assist system 10. The trailer backup assist system 10 utilizes vehicle speed and hitch angle γ data to determine a maximum allowable vehicle threshold speed, taking into account road conditions and the like, as discussed above.


In general, the trailer backup assist system 10 may ensure that the vehicle 14 and trailer 12 do not exceed the maximum threshold trailer angle by limiting the speed of the vehicle 14, limiting the vehicle curvature, or both. Limiting the vehicle speed can be accomplished by sending a command to the brake control system 62 and/or the powertrain control module 14. The brake control system 62 can be utilized to apply the brakes of the vehicle 14 and/or the brakes of a trailer 12 if the trailer 12 is equipped with brakes. Also, the powertrain control module 14 can be utilized to limit the amount of torque generated by the vehicle's engine and/or by down shifting the engine transmission to utilize engine braking if the vehicle 14 has an internal combustion engine. If the vehicle 14 has an electric motor 84, the powertrain system control module may utilize the electric motor 84 to provide braking. The trailer backup assist system 10 may also be configured to increase the vehicle speed if the vehicle speed and hitch angle γ are within the allowable limits.


The trailer backup assist system 10 may also be configured to control the angle of the steered wheels to ensure that the vehicle speed versus hitch angle γ (FIG. 7) does not exceed the allowable limits. In this case, the trailer backup assist system 10 will limit the angle of the steered wheels to a level that is lower than the inputted input command request by the user utilizing the knob 20 (FIG. 4) to prevent the hitch angle γ from exceeding the allowable limits for a given vehicle speed. Thus, the trailer backup assist system 10 may “override” a user steering request and generate a steering command curvature κ2 that includes a reduced steering angle relative to the user steering request. For example, if the vehicle 14 is traveling in reverse at 7 kph, and an operator rapidly rotates the knob 20, the trailer backup assist system 10 may apply the brakes to slow the vehicle 14, but the capability of the trailer backup assist system 10 may not allow the speed of the vehicle 14 to be reduced quickly enough to permit the vehicle 14 to follow the steering input by the user. In this case, the trailer backup assist system 10 may generate a steering command to the power assist steering system 64 that is reduced to avoid unacceptable operating conditions (i.e. too tight of a turn for the vehicle speed). Also, if vehicle 14 is traveling at a very slow speed (e.g. 1.0 kph), the hitch angle γ is still limited due to the physical constraints of the interface between the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12. Thus, the trailer backup assist system 10 may be configured to modify user steering requests and to limit the commands to the power assist steering system 64 to a maximum value that may be less than an input request by a user utilizing the knob 20.


Alternatively, the trailer backup assist system 10 may be configured to reduce the maximum threshold speed of the vehicle 14 if the input magnitude is calculated to cause unacceptable backup conditions without a reduction in speed. The unacceptable backup condition may be soon to occur, or alternatively, the controller 26 may be configured to foresee the onset of an unacceptable backup condition arising if an alteration to the maximum threshold speed is not made.


Furthermore, the trailer backup assist system 10 may be configured to prioritize the user-requested steering input from the knob 20 over the vehicle speed when determining whether to limit the vehicle speed or limit the turn angle to avoid the maximum allowable values as shown in FIGS. 8-9. In general, the input provided by a user to the knob 20 corresponds to a desired trailer path (e.g. trailer path 122; FIG. 6), and the trailer backup assist system 10 may be configured to assume that the desired path is more important than the desired speed. Thus, the trailer backup assist system 10 may be configured to first adjust the vehicle speed to stay within the maximum allowable vehicle speed shown in FIGS. 8-9, followed by (in terms of priority) limiting the trailer curvature, if required, to stay within the allowable limits shown in FIGS. 8-9.


Also, the actual steering angle may lag the steering angle request, and the final (static) steering angle may be somewhat less than the steering request. The trailer backup assist system 10 may be configured to optimize the vehicle speed in reverse to follow the desired path 122 (FIG. 6) within an acceptable error. This allows the trailer backup assist system 10 to keep the steering speed within an optimum range to help keep the vehicle 14 on the desired path 122 with an acceptable amount of error. In general, the required speed of the power assist steering system 64 is a function of the vehicle speed and the lateral movement needed to follow the desired path 122. For example, the steering speeds required to follow a particular lateral change in path increase with vehicle speed. Likewise, the steering speeds required at a particular vehicle speed increase as the change in lateral movement increases.


In general, the vehicle speed and steering can be controlled to optimize the vehicle path in any combination. For example, the power train system control module 66 (FIG. 2) may be configured to control the torque output. The torque output can be monitored and modified to help maintain the optimum speed to support the capability of the power assist steering system 64 to position the vehicle 14 on a desired path. The power train torque output may be limited to reduce the speed of the vehicle 14 when needed by the power assist steering system 64 to keep the vehicle path error within a desirable range. Similarly, the brake torque generated may also be monitored and modified to help maintain the optimum speed to support the capability of the power assist steering system 64 to position the vehicle on a desired path.


The brake control system 62 may be actuated to reduce the speed of the vehicle 14 when needed by the power assist steering system 64 to keep the path error within a desirable range. Furthermore, the automatic gear selection of the vehicle 14 may be controlled, and the vehicle 14 may down shift to facilitate engine braking and reduce the risk of overheating the braking system. Still further, if the vehicle 14 is backing up with a trailer 12 attached, and if the trailer 12 has trailer brakes, the trailer brake torque may be monitored and modified to help maintain the optimum speed to support the capability of the power assist steering system 64 to position the vehicle 14 on a desired path. The trailer brake torque may be applied to help reduce the speed of the vehicle 14 when needed by the power assist steering system 64 to keep the path error within a desirable range.


Referring to FIG. 9, the curvature routine 106 of the trailer backup assist system 10 is illustrated showing an architectural layout, according to one embodiment. The trailer backup assist system 10 includes a plurality of inputs that communicate with a speed limiting controller 156 such that routines stored in the memory 104 of the speed limiting controller 156 may operate based on the plurality of inputs. The plurality of inputs may include memory devices separate from or integrated with the trailer backup assist system controller 26 within the vehicle 14 that stores data from sensors of the trailer backup assist system 10, such as the hitch angle sensor 24, the vehicle speed sensors 78, the steering angle sensor 70, or alternatively the plurality of inputs may otherwise directly transmit data from the sensors without functioning as a memory device. Moreover, it will be appreciated that each of the plurality of inputs disposed within the vehicle 14 may be an independent system disposed within the vehicle 14, or integrally disposed within any system within the vehicle 14.


As illustrated in FIG. 9, a input device 18 may be configured to accept a input command that corresponds to the desired command curvature κ2. In some embodiments, the input device 18 may be in a separate system disposed within the vehicle 14 or the trailer 12, such as a trailer tow lighting module. In the illustrated layout, the input device 18 provides the desired command curvature κ2 to the speed limiting controller 156, which may be determined from the desired backing path 16 that is input with the input device 18. The speed limiting controller 156 computes a desired speed threshold based on the desired command curvature κ2 and the current hitch angle γ.


As further illustrated in FIG. 9, the brake control system 62 transmits a vehicle speed to the speed limiting controller 156. An image processing module 142 may continuously determine the hitch angle γ between the vehicle 14 and trailer 12, as described herein. The powertrain control system 66 may transmit the current status of the transmission to the speed limiting controller 156.


Once the desired speed threshold is computed by the speed limiting controller 156, the speed limiting controller 156 generates a speed limiting command based on a desired speed threshold and a current velocity of the vehicle 14. The speed limiting controller 156 outputs data, in the form of a speed limiting command, the brake control system 62, the powertrain control system 66, and/or any other practicable system within the vehicle 14, which is then fed back to the plurality of inputs 62, 66, 142 to reassess the impacts of other vehicle characteristics impacted from the implementation of the speed limiting command or other changes to the trailer backup assist system 10. Accordingly, the speed limiting controller 156 continually processes information from the plurality of inputs 62, 66, 142 to provide accurate steering angle commands that place the trailer 12 on the desired curvature κ2 and the desired backing path 16, without substantial overshoot or harsh variations in the vehicle threshold speed limit about the desired curvature κ2.


The closed loop speed limiting controller 156 is configured such that the threshold speed limit of the vehicle 14 may be a function of both desired command curvature κ2 and hitch angle γ. As a result, the speed may be automatically limited to a range that enables consistent operation and maximum maneuverability. Speed and jackknife warnings may significantly be reduced, or may be substantially removed from the system operation altogether. Also, driver braking may only be required based on user comfort level and the desired speed for moving the trailer 12. It may not be required to keep the trailer backup assist system 10 functioning or improve the trailer backup assist system's 10 maneuverability. As described herein, the speed limiting controller 156 may determine a first speed limit based on desired command curvature κ2 and a second speed limit based on the instantaneous hitch angle γ. The speed limiting controller 156 may filter the two speed limits to determine a vehicle threshold speed limit. For example, the speed limiting controller 156 may set the vehicle threshold speed limit at the lower of the first and second speed limits. Alternatively, higher order comparative analysis may be utilized by the speed limiting controller 156, as will be described in more detail below.


With reference to FIG. 10, an embodiment of the trailer backup assist system 10 is illustrated in which the trailer backup assist system 10 is configured to monitor the hitch angle γ and desired command curvature κ2 to control the threshold speed of the vehicle 14 to allow the trailer backup assist system 10 to assist in the prevention of unacceptable backup conditions by limiting the threshold speed of the vehicle 14.


The method illustrated in FIG. 10 begins, generally, when the trailer backup assist system 10 is activated in step 160. In step 160, the trailer backup assist system 10 begins the process to steer the vehicle 14 along the desired command curvature κ2 with a threshold speed limit, as described above. In step 162, the kinematic relationship between the trailer 12 and vehicle 14 to which trailer 12 is attached is determined. To determine the kinematic relationship in step 162, various parameters of the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12 are sensed, or otherwise determined for the trailer backup assist system 10, to generate steering commands to the power assist steering system 64 in accordance with the desired curvature κ2 or backing path 16 of the trailer 12.


As disclosed with reference to FIG. 5, the kinematic parameters to define the kinematic relationship may include a length of the trailer 12, a wheel base of the vehicle 14, and a distance from a hitch connection to a rear axle of the vehicle 14 and a hitch angle γ between the vehicle 14 and the trailer 12, among other variables and parameters as previously described. After the kinematic relationship is determined, the trailer backup assist system 10 may proceed at step 164 to determine a current hitch angle γ by receiving input from a sensor 44 (FIG. 1) or by executing a hitch angle estimation routine 110 carried out by the trailer backup assist system 10 using yaw rate sensor 58 of trailer 12, yaw rate sensor 58 of the vehicle 14, among other inputs related to the kinematic relationship, and as described further in copending U.S. Pat. No. 9,340,228, entitled “TRAILER MOTION AND PARAMETER ESTIMATION SYSTEM,” the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Concurrently, the desired command curvature κ2 is received from input device 18 in step 168, which is processed based on the input magnitude of the input device 18 and the kinematic relationship. Next, at step 166, the trailer backup assist system 10 determines a first maximum vehicle speed limit based on the hitch angle γ, as described above. A second maximum speed limit is determined based on the desired command curvature κ2, as also described above, at step 170.


According to the illustrated embodiment, the trailer backup assist system 10, at step 172, compares the first maximum speed limit based on the hitch angle γ to the second maximum speed limit based on the desired command curvature κ2 and sets the vehicle threshold speed limit at the lower of the two values. Accordingly, if the first speed limit is less than the second speed limit, at step 174, the vehicle speed limit will be set at the first speed limit. If, however, the first speed limit is greater than the second speed limit, at step 176, the second speed limit is set as the threshold vehicle speed limit. The trailer backup assist system 10 can continue to repeat steps 162-178 as long as trailer backup assist system 10 remains active (step 160).


The trailer backup assist system 10 continues to monitor hitch angle γ and input device 18 to generate and implement an appropriate vehicle threshold speed, which can be done using the speed sensors 78. The trailer backup assist system 10 can then compare the first and second vehicle speed limits and determine if intervention is desired based on any comparative analysis. As discussed above, the threshold speed can be a speed at which trailer backup assist system 10 is capable of generating and implementing a steering command to prevent hitch angle γ from approaching jackknife angle γ(j) at an uncontrollable rate, which may be influenced by, among other things, the speed of the processor 192, the responsiveness of power assist steering system 64, and in particular electric steering motor 84, as well as length L of trailer 12. The speed threshold can be predetermined and stored for access by the trailer backup assist system 10 in carrying out a comparison of the first and second vehicle speed limits to the threshold speed. The speed threshold can be estimated based on the parameters provided herein, while conservatively estimating for a short trailer length L.


With reference to FIG. 11, the trailer backup assist system 10 is illustrated, according to one embodiment, in which the hitch angle γ and desired command curvatures κ2 are continually monitored. It may be advantageous to implement a higher order function or LUT to generate a first or second speed limit from the hitch angle γ and/or desired command curvature κ2. Further, rather than simply assigning the threshold speed limit to the minimum, as described in reference to FIG. 10, it may be desirable to have a primary and a secondary set speed limit that allows higher vehicle speeds when the absolute value of the hitch angle γ rate is decreasing and/or the desired command curvature κ2 input magnitude is decreasing thereby resulting in a decreasing absolute hitch angle γ rate.


As illustrated in FIG. 11, the system begins at step 182. At step 184, the trailer backup assist system 10 calculates whether the hitch angle γ rate is increasing or decreasing. If the hitch angle γ is not decreasing, at step 186, the system 10 continues to step 192 and sets a primary set speed limit based on values stored within a LUT, or through any other means. At step 183, the desired command angle is received from the input device 18. At step 188, the trailer backup assist system 10 receives the desired command angle and calculates the corresponding command curvature κ2 supplied to the system from the input device 18, or any other practicable device. At step 190, the trailer backup assist system 10 calculates if the desired command curvature κ2 is less than the hitch angle γ. If the desired command curvature κ2 is not less than the hitch angle γ, the primary speed limit that is set in step 192 is utilized. If, however, the desired command curvature κ2 is less than the instantaneous hitch angle γ, a secondary speed limit is set at step 194. The primary and secondary speed limits are both inputted into a filter within the controller at step 196. Based on the predefined calculation method within the filter, the filter may determine the threshold speed limit of the vehicle based on the instantaneous inputted primary and secondary set speed limits. The trailer backup assist system 10 can continue to repeat steps 184-198 as long trailer backup assist system 10 remains active (step 198).


Accordingly, if only the primary speed limit is set, the vehicle speed limit is set at the primary speed limit. If a primary speed limit and a secondary speed limit are set, the speed limits are filtered to determine the vehicle threshold speed. The filter may be configured as a discrete-time low-pass filter of any order, continuous-time low-pass filter of any order, and/or a band-pass filter. Alternatively, the controller 26 may calculate the threshold speed based on an average of the primary and secondary speed limits, set the threshold speed limit at the higher or lower value, interpolate between any number of values, use a best fit analysis, and/or use any other comparative technique that may eliminate faults within the trailer backup assist system 10. The vehicle threshold speed may be filtered before it is passed to the feedback controller, which may help with smooth transitions between threshold speed limits.


The primary speed limit may be set based on any desired input within the trailer backup assist system 10. Likewise, the second speed limit may also be set on any other desired input. The controller 26 may then filter the first and second inputs, if more than a single input exists, based on any known method to determine an instantaneous threshold speed for the vehicle 14. Moreover, it is contemplated that the controller 26 may determine a vehicle threshold speed based on any number of inputs that are monitored by the vehicle 14 and/or the trailer 12 during utilization thereof.


With reference to FIGS. 10 and 11, the trailer backup assist system 10 can compare the vehicle threshold speed determined in step 172 with the actual vehicle speed. If the vehicle speed is below the threshold speed, trailer backup assist system 10 continues without intervention. If the vehicle speed is above the threshold speed, trailer backup assist system 10 may take action such as by causing powertrain control system 66 to reduce engine output, which can be done by adjusting the throttle position to decrease the output below that which is being demanded by the position of the accelerator pedal, as directed by the driver. The trailer backup assist system 10 can continue to monitor the vehicle speed to determine if the action is sufficient to reduce the speed of vehicle 14 to below the threshold speed. If, at such a point, the vehicle speed has been reduced to below the threshold speed, trailer backup assist system 10 can return to normal operation or can continue to cause power train control system 74 to operate at a reduced throttle position so long as needed to effectively maintain vehicle speed below the threshold speed. If, after reducing engine output the trailer backup assist system 10 determines that the vehicle speed is still above the threshold speed, the trailer backup assist system 10 can cause vehicle brake control system 62 to actuate the vehicle brakes, thereby applying a brake torque to vehicle 14 to further attempt to slow vehicle speed to below the threshold speed.


Again, the trailer backup assist system 10 can continue to cause vehicle 14 to operate at a reduced engine output and with brakes applied as long as necessary to effectively maintain vehicle speed below threshold speed. Similarly, trailer backup assist system 10 can reduce brake torque, including to zero, and can restore engine output if it has been determined that no further intervention is required. If, however, it is determined that the reduction in engine output and the application of brake torque is not sufficient to lower the speed of vehicle 14 to below the threshold speed, trailer backup assist system 10 can take further measures, including presenting a warning to the driver, including by displaying a warning message on display 100 of vehicle HMI 98 or by issuing an audible tone, such as through speaker 96. It is noted that, in various embodiments the actions described herein can be carried out in various alternative orders, including initially presenting a warning to the driver before reducing engine output and applying a brake torque. In further alternative embodiments, trailer backup assist system 10 can be configured to apply a brake torque prior to reducing engine output.


The trailer backup assist system 10, having the features shown in FIG. 11, may operate at higher speeds during straight or small curvature maneuvers where a large distance may need to be covered at low hitch angles and small input magnitudes in a desired command curvature κ2. Also, jackknifing robustness may be enhanced by lowering the threshold speed as the system goes into high hitch angle conditions or is close to a jackknife condition. Further, changes in vehicle speed may be perceptively smoother and more consistent to an occupant while in a turn with the varying speed threshold that is determined based on a plurality of inputs and filtration of those inputs as the system may regulate the vehicle threshold speed within a safe operating speed prior to the onset of an unacceptable backup condition.


It will be understood by one having ordinary skill in the art that construction of the described invention and other components is not limited to any specific material. Other exemplary embodiments of the invention disclosed herein may be formed from a wide variety of materials, unless described otherwise herein.


For purposes of this disclosure, the term “coupled” (in all of its forms, couple, coupling, coupled, etc.) generally means the joining of two components (electrical or mechanical) directly or indirectly to one another. Such joining may be stationary in nature or movable in nature. Such joining may be achieved with the two components (electrical or mechanical) and any additional intermediate members being integrally formed as a single unitary body with one another or with the two components. Such joining may be permanent in nature or may be removable or releasable in nature unless otherwise stated.


Furthermore, any arrangement of components to achieve the same functionality is effectively “associated” such that the desired functionality is achieved. Hence, any two components herein combined to achieve a particular functionality can be seen as “associated with” each other such that the desired functionality is achieved, irrespective of architectures or intermedial components. Likewise, any two components so associated can also be viewed as being “operably connected” or “operably coupled” to each other to achieve the desired functionality, and any two components capable of being so associated can also be viewed as being “operably couplable” to each other to achieve the desired functionality. Some examples of operably couplable include, but are not limited, to physically mateable and/or physically interacting components and/or wirelessly interactable and/or wirelessly interacting components and/or logically interacting and/or logically interactable components.


It is also important to note that the construction and arrangement of the elements of the invention as shown in the exemplary embodiments is illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments of the present innovations have been described in detail in this disclosure, those skilled in the art who review this disclosure will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations, etc.) without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter recited. For example, elements shown as integrally formed may be constructed of multiple parts or elements shown as multiple parts may be integrally formed, the operation of the interfaces may be reversed or otherwise varied, the length or width of the structures and/or members or connector or other elements of the system may be varied, the nature or number of adjustment positions provided between the elements may be varied. It should be noted that the elements and/or assemblies of the system may be constructed from any of a wide variety of materials that provide sufficient strength or durability, in any of a wide variety of colors, textures, and combinations. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present innovations. Other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions, and arrangement of the desired and other exemplary embodiments without departing from the spirit of the present innovations.


It will be understood that any described processes or steps within described processes may be combined with other disclosed processes or steps to form structures within the scope of the present invention. The exemplary structures and processes disclosed herein are for illustrative purposes and are not to be construed as limiting.


It is also to be understood that variations and modifications can be made on the aforementioned structures and methods without departing from the concepts of the present invention, and further it is to be understood that such concepts are intended to be covered by the following claims unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise.

Claims
  • 1. A trailer backup assist system, comprising: a hitch angle sensor configured to determine a hitch angle between a vehicle and a trailer attached thereto;an input device configured to accept an input command corresponding to a trailer path command curvature; anda controller configured to determine a vehicle threshold speed limit by determining a first vehicle speed limit based on the hitch angle and a second vehicle speed limit based on the command curvature, wherein the controller generates a command to limit vehicle speed in a reverse direction below the threshold speed limit and the vehicle threshold speed limit is set to the higher of the first and second vehicle speed limits when a magnitude of an input command is decreasing and the vehicle threshold speed limit is set to the lower of the first and second vehicle speed limits when a magnitude of input command is increasing.
  • 2. The trailer backup assist system of claim 1, wherein the command controls at least one of a brake system, an engine torque, and a transmission gear selection to thereby control the vehicle speed in the reverse direction.
  • 3. The trailer backup assist system of claim 2, wherein the brake system is a vehicle brake system.
  • 4. The trailer backup assist system of claim 1, wherein the vehicle threshold speed limit is the higher of the first and second vehicle speed limits when a magnitude of hitch angle is decreasing and the desired trailer path command curvature is less than an instantaneous trailer path curvature.
  • 5. The trailer backup assist system of claim 1, wherein the input device includes a rotatable knob configured to be mounted in a vehicle interior.
  • 6. A method of controlling the speed of a motor vehicle, the method comprising: determining a hitch angle between a vehicle and a trailer attached to the vehicle;determining a trailer curvature command based on an input device;calculating a first vehicle speed limit based on the hitch angle;calculating a second speed limit based on the trailer path curvature command;determining a threshold speed limit based on the first and second speed limits; andlimiting the speed of the vehicle to the threshold speed, wherein a controller sets the vehicle threshold speed limit at the higher of the first and second speed limits when an absolute value of the hitch angle is decreasing and a trailer curvature command magnitude is also decreasing.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein a vehicle is maintained below the threshold speed limit by controlling at least one of a brake system, an engine torque, and a transmission gear selection to move the trailer along a desired trailer curvature path that is within an acceptable error criteria.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the input device receives an input as an input magnitude that is correlated to a corresponding trailer curvature path based on values stored in a look-up table.
  • 9. The method of claim 6, wherein the input device is biased towards a neutral position.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/284,791, which was filed on Oct. 4, 2016, entitled “SPEED CONTROL FOR MOTOR VEHICLES,” which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/243,475, which was filed on Oct. 19, 2015, entitled “SPEED OPTIMIZED TRAJECTORY CONTROL FOR MOTOR VEHICLES,” the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (326)
Number Name Date Kind
3542390 Fikes et al. Nov 1970 A
3605088 Savelli Sep 1971 A
3787077 Sanders Jan 1974 A
3833928 Gavit et al. Sep 1974 A
3860257 Mesley Jan 1975 A
4040006 Kimmel Aug 1977 A
4042132 Bohman et al. Aug 1977 A
4122390 Kollitz et al. Oct 1978 A
4212483 Howard Jul 1980 A
4366966 Ratsko et al. Jan 1983 A
4735432 Brown Apr 1988 A
4752080 Rogers Jun 1988 A
4848449 Martinet et al. Jul 1989 A
4852901 Beasley et al. Aug 1989 A
4943080 Reimer Jul 1990 A
5001639 Breen Mar 1991 A
5056905 Jensen Oct 1991 A
5097250 Hernandez Mar 1992 A
5108123 Rubenzik Apr 1992 A
5108158 Breen Apr 1992 A
5132851 Bomar et al. Jul 1992 A
5152544 Dierker, Jr. et al. Oct 1992 A
5191328 Nelson Mar 1993 A
5244226 Bergh Sep 1993 A
5246242 Penzotti Sep 1993 A
5247442 Kendall Sep 1993 A
5282641 McLaughlin Feb 1994 A
5289892 Notsu Mar 1994 A
5290057 Pellerito Mar 1994 A
5455557 Noll et al. Oct 1995 A
5521633 Nakajima et al. May 1996 A
5523947 Breen Jun 1996 A
5541778 DeFlorio Jul 1996 A
5558350 Kimbrough et al. Sep 1996 A
5559696 Borenstein Sep 1996 A
5579228 Kimbrough et al. Nov 1996 A
5631656 Hartman et al. May 1997 A
5650764 McCullough Jul 1997 A
5690347 Juergens et al. Nov 1997 A
5719713 Brown Feb 1998 A
5747683 Gerum et al. May 1998 A
5821852 Fairchild Oct 1998 A
5980048 Rannells et al. Nov 1999 A
6041582 Tiede et al. Mar 2000 A
6042196 Nakamura et al. Mar 2000 A
6056371 Lin et al. May 2000 A
6124709 Allwine Sep 2000 A
6151175 Osha Nov 2000 A
6198992 Winslow Mar 2001 B1
6217177 Rost Apr 2001 B1
6218828 Bates et al. Apr 2001 B1
6223104 Kamen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6223114 Boros et al. Apr 2001 B1
6268800 Howard Jul 2001 B1
6292094 Deng et al. Sep 2001 B1
6351698 Kubota et al. Feb 2002 B1
6472865 Tola et al. Oct 2002 B1
6480104 Wall et al. Nov 2002 B1
6483429 Yasui et al. Nov 2002 B1
6494476 Masters et al. Dec 2002 B2
6498977 Wetzel et al. Dec 2002 B2
6539288 Ishida et al. Mar 2003 B2
6567731 Chandy May 2003 B2
6568093 Kogiso et al. May 2003 B2
6577952 Geier et al. Jun 2003 B2
6668225 Oh et al. Dec 2003 B2
6712378 Austin Mar 2004 B1
6801125 McGregor et al. Oct 2004 B1
6806809 Lee et al. Oct 2004 B2
6820888 Griffin Nov 2004 B1
6838979 Deng et al. Jan 2005 B2
6854557 Deng et al. Feb 2005 B1
6857494 Kobayashi et al. Feb 2005 B2
6879240 Kruse Apr 2005 B2
6956468 Lee et al. Oct 2005 B2
6959970 Tseng Nov 2005 B2
6999856 Lee et al. Feb 2006 B2
7005974 McMahon et al. Feb 2006 B2
7006127 Mizusawa et al. Feb 2006 B2
7008088 Pisciotti Mar 2006 B2
7028804 Eki et al. Apr 2006 B2
7032705 Zheng et al. Apr 2006 B2
7046127 Boddy May 2006 B2
7058493 Inagaki Jun 2006 B2
7089101 Fischer et al. Aug 2006 B2
7154385 Lee et al. Dec 2006 B2
7159890 Craig et al. Jan 2007 B2
7167785 Lohberg et al. Jan 2007 B2
7170285 Spratte Jan 2007 B2
7171330 Kruse et al. Jan 2007 B2
7204504 Gehring et al. Apr 2007 B2
7219913 Atley May 2007 B2
7225891 Gehring et al. Jun 2007 B2
7229139 Lu et al. Jun 2007 B2
7239958 Grougan et al. Jul 2007 B2
7269489 Deng et al. Sep 2007 B2
7272481 Einig et al. Sep 2007 B2
7295907 Lu et al. Nov 2007 B2
7401871 Lu et al. Jul 2008 B2
7405557 Spratte et al. Jul 2008 B2
7413266 Lenz et al. Aug 2008 B2
7425889 Widmann et al. Sep 2008 B2
7447585 Tandy, Jr. et al. Nov 2008 B2
7451020 Goetting et al. Nov 2008 B2
7463137 Wishart et al. Dec 2008 B2
7504995 Lawrence et al. Mar 2009 B2
7532109 Takahama et al. May 2009 B2
7540523 Russell et al. Jun 2009 B2
7548155 Schutt et al. Jun 2009 B2
7568716 Dietz Aug 2009 B2
7623952 Unruh et al. Nov 2009 B2
7648153 Metternich et al. Jan 2010 B2
7690737 Lu Apr 2010 B2
7715953 Shepard May 2010 B2
7731302 Tandy, Jr. et al. Jun 2010 B2
7793965 Padula Sep 2010 B2
7798263 Tandy, Jr. et al. Sep 2010 B2
7878545 Rhymer et al. Feb 2011 B2
7904222 Lee et al. Mar 2011 B2
7905507 Perri Mar 2011 B2
7950751 Offerle et al. May 2011 B2
7953536 Katrak May 2011 B2
7974444 Hongo Jul 2011 B2
8010252 Getman et al. Aug 2011 B2
8010253 Lundquist Aug 2011 B2
8038166 Piesinger Oct 2011 B1
8044779 Hahn et al. Oct 2011 B2
8073594 Lee et al. Dec 2011 B2
8157284 McGhie et al. Apr 2012 B1
8165770 Getman et al. Apr 2012 B2
8167444 Lee et al. May 2012 B2
8170726 Chen et al. May 2012 B2
8174576 Akatsuka et al. May 2012 B2
8180543 Futamura et al. May 2012 B2
8190364 Rekow May 2012 B2
8191915 Freese, V et al. Jun 2012 B2
8192036 Lee et al. Jun 2012 B2
8215436 DeGrave et al. Jul 2012 B2
8223204 Hahn Jul 2012 B2
8244442 Craig et al. Aug 2012 B2
8260518 Englert Sep 2012 B2
8267485 Barlsen et al. Sep 2012 B2
8280607 Gatti et al. Oct 2012 B2
8308182 Ortmann et al. Nov 2012 B2
8326504 Wu et al. Dec 2012 B2
8342560 Albers et al. Jan 2013 B2
8380390 Sy et al. Feb 2013 B2
8380416 Offerle et al. Feb 2013 B2
8393632 Vortmeyer et al. Mar 2013 B2
8401744 Chiocco Mar 2013 B2
8427288 Schofield et al. Apr 2013 B2
8469125 Yu et al. Jun 2013 B2
8504243 Kageyama Aug 2013 B2
8548680 Ryerson et al. Oct 2013 B2
8548683 Cebon et al. Oct 2013 B2
8576115 Basten Nov 2013 B2
8626382 Obradovich Jan 2014 B2
8675953 Elwell et al. Mar 2014 B1
8755984 Rupp et al. Jun 2014 B2
8807261 Subrt et al. Aug 2014 B2
8833789 Anderson Sep 2014 B2
8886400 Kossira et al. Nov 2014 B2
8888120 Trevino Nov 2014 B2
8909426 Rhode et al. Dec 2014 B2
8930140 Trombley et al. Jan 2015 B2
8939462 Adamczyk et al. Jan 2015 B2
8955865 Fortin et al. Feb 2015 B2
9008913 Sears et al. Apr 2015 B1
9026311 Pieronek et al. May 2015 B1
9042603 Elwart et al. May 2015 B2
9082315 Lin et al. Jul 2015 B2
9108598 Headley Aug 2015 B2
9114832 Wang et al. Aug 2015 B2
9120358 Motts et al. Sep 2015 B2
9120359 Chiu et al. Sep 2015 B2
9180890 Lu et al. Nov 2015 B2
9238483 Hafner et al. Jan 2016 B2
9248858 Lavoie et al. Feb 2016 B2
9315212 Kyrtsos et al. Apr 2016 B1
9321483 Headley Apr 2016 B2
9335162 Kyrtsos et al. May 2016 B2
9340228 Xu et al. May 2016 B2
9428188 Schwindt et al. Aug 2016 B2
9623904 Lavoie et al. Apr 2017 B2
9676377 Hafner et al. Jun 2017 B2
9827818 Hu et al. Nov 2017 B2
9840278 Lavoie et al. Dec 2017 B2
20010024333 Rost Sep 2001 A1
20010037164 Hecker Nov 2001 A1
20020128764 Hecker et al. Sep 2002 A1
20040017285 Zielinski et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040021291 Haug et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040093139 Wildey et al. May 2004 A1
20050000738 Gehring et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050128059 Vause Jun 2005 A1
20050206225 Offerle et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050206231 Lu et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050236201 Spannheimer et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050236896 Offerle et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060041358 Hara Feb 2006 A1
20060071447 Gehring et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060076828 Lu et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060103511 Lee et al. May 2006 A1
20060111820 Goetting et al. May 2006 A1
20060142936 Dix Jun 2006 A1
20060155455 Lucas et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060244579 Raab Nov 2006 A1
20070027581 Bauer et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070090688 Haemmerling et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070132560 Nystrom et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070152424 Deng et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070285808 Beale Dec 2007 A1
20080143593 Graziano et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147277 Lu et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080231701 Greenwood et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080312792 Dechamp Dec 2008 A1
20090005932 Lee et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090079828 Lee et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090085775 Otsuka et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090093928 Getman et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090198425 Englert Aug 2009 A1
20090228182 Waldbauer et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090248346 Fennel et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090300701 Karaoguz et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090306861 Schumann et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100063702 Sabelstrom et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100171828 Ishii Jul 2010 A1
20100332049 Sy et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110001825 Hahn Jan 2011 A1
20110018231 Collenberg Jan 2011 A1
20110022282 Wu et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110087398 Lu et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110112721 Wang et al. May 2011 A1
20110125457 Lee et al. May 2011 A1
20110160956 Chung et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110257860 Getman et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120041658 Turner Feb 2012 A1
20120086808 Lynam et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120095649 Klier et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120109471 Wu May 2012 A1
20120112434 Albers et al. May 2012 A1
20120185131 Headley Jul 2012 A1
20120200706 Greenwood et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120271512 Rupp et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271514 Lavoie et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271515 Rhode et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271522 Rupp et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120283909 Dix Nov 2012 A1
20120283910 Lee et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120310594 Watanabe Dec 2012 A1
20130024064 Shepard Jan 2013 A1
20130027195 Van Wiemeersch et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130082453 Padula Apr 2013 A1
20130158863 Skvarce et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130179038 Goswami et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130207834 Mizutani et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130226390 Luo et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130250114 Lu Sep 2013 A1
20130261843 Kossira et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130268160 Trombley et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140005918 Qiang Jan 2014 A1
20140025260 McClure Jan 2014 A1
20140052337 Lavoie et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058614 Trombley et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058622 Trombley et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058655 Trombley et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058668 Trombley et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140067154 Yu et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140067155 Yu et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140085472 Lu et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140088824 Ishimoto Mar 2014 A1
20140160276 Pliefke et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140172232 Rupp et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140183841 Jones Jul 2014 A1
20140188344 Lavoie Jul 2014 A1
20140188346 Lavoie Jul 2014 A1
20140210456 Crossman Jul 2014 A1
20140218506 Trombley et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140218522 Lavoie Aug 2014 A1
20140222288 Lavoie et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140236532 Trombley et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140249691 Hafner et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140267688 Aich et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140267689 Lavoie Sep 2014 A1
20140277941 Chiu et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277942 Kyrtsos et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140297128 Lavoie et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140297129 Lavoie et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303847 Lavoie Oct 2014 A1
20140309888 Smit et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140324295 Lavoie Oct 2014 A1
20140343795 Lavoie Nov 2014 A1
20140379217 Rupp et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150002670 Bajpai Jan 2015 A1
20150035256 Klank et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150057903 Rhode et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150066296 Trombley et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150066298 Sharma et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150105975 Dunn Apr 2015 A1
20150115571 Zhang et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150120141 Lavoie et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150120143 Schlichting Apr 2015 A1
20150134183 Lavoie et al. May 2015 A1
20150138340 Lavoie May 2015 A1
20150149040 Hueger et al. May 2015 A1
20150158527 Hafner et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150165850 Chiu et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150197278 Boos et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150203156 Hafner et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150210254 Pieronek et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150210317 Hafner et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150217693 Pliefke et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150269444 Lameyre et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150298738 Hoel Oct 2015 A1
20160009288 Yu Jan 2016 A1
20160096549 Herzog et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160129939 Singh et al. May 2016 A1
20160152263 Singh et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160153778 Singh et al. Jun 2016 A1
20170073005 Ghneim et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170101130 Lavoie Apr 2017 A1
20170106796 Lavoie et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170174130 Hu et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170297619 Lavoie et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170297620 Lavoie et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170313351 Lavoie Nov 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (95)
Number Date Country
102582686 Sep 2013 CN
3923676 Jan 1991 DE
3931518 Apr 1991 DE
9208595 Sep 1992 DE
19526702 Feb 1997 DE
10030738 Aug 2001 DE
10031244 Jan 2002 DE
10065230 Jul 2002 DE
10122562 Jul 2002 DE
10154612 May 2003 DE
10312548 May 2004 DE
10333998 Feb 2005 DE
102004050149 Apr 2006 DE
102005042957 Mar 2007 DE
102005043466 Mar 2007 DE
102005043467 Mar 2007 DE
102005043468 Mar 2007 DE
102006002294 Jul 2007 DE
102006048947 Apr 2008 DE
102006056408 Jun 2008 DE
102008020838 Nov 2008 DE
102007029413 Jan 2009 DE
102008004158 Aug 2009 DE
102008004159 Aug 2009 DE
102008004160 Aug 2009 DE
102008045436 Mar 2010 DE
102006035021 Apr 2010 DE
102008043675 May 2010 DE
102009007990 Aug 2010 DE
102009012253 Sep 2010 DE
102009027041 Dec 2010 DE
102009038552 Feb 2011 DE
102010006323 Aug 2011 DE
102010021052 Nov 2011 DE
102010029184 Nov 2011 DE
102010045519 Mar 2012 DE
102011104256 Jul 2012 DE
102011101990 Oct 2012 DE
102011108440 Jan 2013 DE
202012010517 Jan 2013 DE
102011120814 Jun 2013 DE
102012006206 Oct 2013 DE
102012206133 Oct 2013 DE
102012019234 Apr 2014 DE
102013000198 Jul 2017 DE
418653 Mar 1991 EP
0433858 Jun 1991 EP
1593552 Mar 2007 EP
1810913 Jul 2007 EP
1361543 Apr 2014 EP
2388180 Oct 2014 EP
2551132 Nov 2015 EP
2644477 Jul 2016 EP
2803944 Aug 2016 EP
2452549 Nov 2018 EP
2487454 Dec 2018 EP
2515379 Apr 1983 FR
2265587 Oct 1993 GB
2342630 Apr 2000 GB
2398048 Aug 2004 GB
2398049 Aug 2004 GB
2398050 Aug 2004 GB
61006458 Jan 1986 JP
6159491 Mar 1986 JP
6385568 Jun 1988 JP
01095980 Apr 1989 JP
01095981 Apr 1989 JP
09267762 Oct 1997 JP
09328078 Dec 1997 JP
10001063 Jan 1998 JP
11124051 May 1999 JP
11278319 Oct 1999 JP
2002012172 Jan 2002 JP
2002068032 Mar 2002 JP
2003034261 Feb 2003 JP
2003148938 May 2003 JP
3716722 Nov 2005 JP
2008027138 Feb 2008 JP
2012105158 May 2012 JP
2012166647 Sep 2012 JP
2014002056 Jan 2014 JP
8503263 Aug 1985 WO
0044605 Aug 2000 WO
2005005200 Jan 2005 WO
2005116688 Dec 2005 WO
2006042665 Apr 2006 WO
2012059207 May 2012 WO
2012103193 Aug 2012 WO
2013186208 Dec 2013 WO
2014019730 Feb 2014 WO
2014037500 Mar 2014 WO
2014070047 May 2014 WO
2014092611 Jun 2014 WO
2014123575 Aug 2014 WO
2015074027 May 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (43)
Entry
F. Cuesta and A. Ollero, “Intelligent System for Parallel Parking of Cars and Tractor-Trailers”, Intelligent Mobile Robot Navigation, STAR, 2005, pp. 159-188, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Novak, Domen; Dovzan, Dejan; Grebensek, Rok; Oblak, Simon, “Automated Parking System for a Truck and Trailer”, International Conference on Advances in the Internet, Processing, Systems and Interdisciplinary Research, Florence, 2007, WorldCat.org, 13 pgs.
SH. Azadi, H.R. Rezaei Nedamani, and R. Kazemi, “Automatic Parking of an Articulated Vehicle Using ANFIS”, Global Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology (ISSN: 2322-2441), 2013, pp. 93-104, Issue No. 14.
“Ford Super Duty: Truck Technologies”, Brochure, Sep. 2011, 2 pages.
Kristopher Bunker, “2012 Guide to Towing”, Trailer Life, 2012, 38 pages.
A. Gonzalez-Cantos, “Backing-Up Maneuvers of Autonomous Tractor-Trailer Vehicles using the Qualitative Theory of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems,” International Journal of Robotics Research, Jan. 2009, vol. 28, 1 page.
L. Chu, Y. Fang, M. Shang, J. Guo, F. Zhou, “Estimation of Articulation Angle for Tractor Semi-Trailer Based on State Observer”, ACM Digital Library, ICMTMA '10 Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Measuring Technology and Automation, vol. 2, Mar. 2010, 1 page.
M. Wagner, D. Zoebel, and A. Meroth, “Adaptive Software and Systems Architecture for Driver Assistance Systems” International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, Oct. 2011, vol. 1, No. 4, 7 pages.
F.W. Kienhöfer; D. Cebon, “An Investigation of ABS Strategies for Articulated Vehicles”, Cambridge University, Engineering Department, United Kingdom, date unknown, 13 pages.
C. Lundquist; W. Reinelt; O. Enqvist, “Back Driving Assistant for Passenger Cars with Trailer”, ZF Lenksysteme GmbH, Schwäbisch Gmünd, Germany, 2006 (SAE Int'l) Jan. 2006, 8 pages.
Zhe Leng; Minor, M., “A Simple Tractor-Trailer Backing Control Law for Path Following”, IEEE, Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) IEEE/RSJ International Conference, Oct. 2010, 2 pages.
Kinjo, H.; Maeshiro, M.; Uezato, E.; Yamamoto, T., “Adaptive Genetic Algorithm Observer and its Application to Trailer Truck Control System”, IEEE, SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference, Oct. 2006, 2 pgs.
J. Roh; H. Lee; W. Chung, “Control of a Car with a Trailer Using the Driver Assistance System”, IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics; Phuket, Thailand, Dec. 2011, 6 pages.
A. Gonzalez-Cantos; J.I. Maza; A. Ollero, “Design of a Stable Backing Up Fuzzy Control of Autonomous Articulated Vehicles for Factory Automation”, Dept. of Systems Engineering and Automatic Control, University of Seville, Spain, 2001, 5 pages.
Altafini, C.; Speranzon, A.; Wahlberg, B., “A Feedback Control Scheme for Reversing a Truck and Trailer Vehicle”, IEEE, Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transactions, Dec. 2001, vol. 17, No. 6, 2 pages.
Zare, A. Sharafi; M. Kamyad, A.V., “A New Approach in Intelligent Trailer Parking”, IEEE, 2010 2nd International Mechanical and Electrical Technology (ICMET), Sep. 2010, 1 page.
Tanaka, K.; Sano, M., “A Robust Stabilization Problem of Fuzzy Control Systems and its Application to Backing up Control of a Truck-trailer”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, May 1994, vol. 2, No. 2, 1 page.
Sharafi, M. Zare; A. Kamyad; A.V. Nikpoor, S., “Intelligent Parking Method for Truck in Presence of Fixed and Moving Obstacles and Trailer in Presence of Fixed Obstacles: Advanced Fuzzy Logic Technologies in Industrial Applications”, IEEE, 2010 International Electronics and Information Engineering (ICEIE), Aug. 2010, vol. 2, 1 page.
Hodo, D. W.; Hung, J.Y.; Bevly, D. M.; Millhouse, S., “Effects of Sensor Placement and Errors on Path Following Control of a Mobile Robot-Trailer System”, IEEE, American Control Conference, Jul. 2007, 1 page.
Sharafi, M. Zare; A. Kamyad; A.V. Nikpoor, S., “Intelligent Parking Method for Trailers in Presence of Fixed and Moving Obstacles”, IEEE, 2010 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE), Aug. 2010, vol. 6, 1 page.
Chieh Chen; Tomizuka, M., “Steering and Independent Braking Control for Tractor-Semitrailer Vehicles in Automated Highway Systems”, IEEE, Proceedings of the 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Dec. 1995, vol. 2, 1 page.
P. Bolzern, R.M. Desantis, A. Locatelli, “An Input-Output Linearization Approach to the Control of an n-Body Articulated Vehicle”, J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control, Sep. 2001, vol. 123, No. 3, 3 pages.
Dieter Zöbel, David Polock, Philipp Wojke, “Steering Assistance for Backing Up Articulated Vehicles”, Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics; vol. 1, No. 5, date unknown, 6 pages.
J.R. Billing; J.D. Patten; R.B. Madill, “Development of Configurations for Infrastructure-Friendly Five- and Six-Axle SemiTrailers”, National Research Council of Canada and Ontario Ministry of Transportation, date unknown, 11 pages.
Jesus Morales, Anthony Mandow, Jorge L. Martinez, and Alfonso Garcia-Cerezo, “Driver Assistance System for Backward Maneuvers in Passive Multi-Trailer Vehicles”, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Oct. 2012, 7 pages.
Cedric Pradalier and Kane Usher, “Experiments in Autonomous Reversing of a Tractor-Trailer System”, 6th International Conference on Field and Service Robotics, inria-00195700, Version 1, Dec. 2007, 10 pages.
Andri Riid, Alar Leibak, Ennu Rüstern, “Fuzzy Backing Control of Truck and Two Trailers”, Tallinn University of Technology; Tallinn, Estonia, date unknown, 6 pages.
Jane McGrath, “How to Avoid Jackknifing”, A Discovery Company, date unknown, 3 pages.
Claudio Altafini, Alberto Speranzon, and Karl Henrik Johansson, “Hybrid Control of a Truck and Trailer Vehicle”, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, HSCC 2002, LNCS 2289; 2002, 14 pages.
Jujnovich, B.; Roebuck, R.; Odhams, A.; David, C., “Implementation of Active Rear Steering of a Tractor Semitrailer”, Cambridge University, Engineering Department; Cambridge, United Kingdom, date unknown, 10 pages.
A.M.C. Odhams; R.L. Roebuck; C. Cebon, “Implementation of Active Steering on a Multiple Trailer Long Combination Vehicle”, Cambridge University, Engineering Department; Cambridge, United Kingdom, date unknown, 13 pages.
Cedric Pradalier and Kane Usher, “Robust Trajectory Tracking for a Reversing Tractor-Trailer System”, (Draft), Field and Service Robotics Conference, CSIRO ICT Centre, Jul. 2007, 16 pages.
Stahn, R.; Heiserich, G.; Stopp, A., “Laser Scanner-Based Navigation for Commercial Vehicles”, IEEE, 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Jun. 2007, 1 page.
Lee Yong H.; Weiwen Deng; Chin Yuen-Kwok Steve; McKay Neil, “Feasibility Study for a Vehicle-Trailer Backing Up Control”, Refdoc.fr, SAE Transactions, vol. 113, No. 6, 2004, 1 page.
A.M.C. Odhams; R.L. Roebuck; B.A. Jujnovich; D. Cebon, “Active Steering of a Tractor-Semi-Trailer” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, SAGE Journals, vol. 225, No. 7, Jul. 2011, 1 page.
Haviland, G S, “Automatic Brake Control for Trucks—What Good Is It?”, TRID, Society of Automotive Engineers, Sep. 1968, 1 page.
William E. Travis; David W. Hodo; David M. Bevly; John Y. Hung, “UGV Trailer Position Estimation Using a Dynamic Base RTK System”, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, date unknown, 12 pages.
“VSE Electronic Trailer Steering”, ETS for Trailers, version 2009, VSE Trailer Systems B.V., 2009, 28 pages.
“Telematics Past, Present, and Future,” Automotive Service Association, www.ASAshop.org, May 2008, 20 pages.
“Fully Automatic Trailer Tow Hitch With LIN Bus,” https://webista.bmw.com/webista/show?id=1860575499&lang=engb&print=1, date unknown, 5 pages.
“VBOX Yaw Rate Sensor With Integral Accelerometers,” Racelogic, www.racelogic.co.uk, date unknown, 2 pages.
P.D.C.R Jayarathna; J.V Wijayakulasooriya; S.R Kodituwakku, “Fuzzy Logic and Neural Network Control Systems for Backing up a Truck and a Trailer”, International Journal of Latest Trends in Computing, vol. 2, No. 3, Sep. 2011, 8 pages.
Olof Enqvist, “AFS-Assisted Trailer Reversing,” Institutionen for systemteknik Deartment of Electrical Engineering, Jan. 27, 2006, 57 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200198702 A1 Jun 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62243475 Oct 2015 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15284791 Oct 2016 US
Child 16793177 US