Speed optimized trajectory control for motor vehicles

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11124235
  • Patent Number
    11,124,235
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 15, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 21, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
A trailer backup assist system for motor vehicles includes an auxiliary user input feature that can be used by a vehicle operator to provide a steering curvature command corresponding to a desired vehicle path curvature without requiring a user to move a steering wheel of the motor vehicle. The trailer backup assist system is configured to control a vehicle speed while the vehicle is backing up with a trailer attached thereto utilizing an input comprising at least one of a steering curvature command and an angle of a trailer relative to the vehicle. The trailer backup assist system controls at least one of a brake system, an engine torque, and a transmission gear selection to thereby control vehicle speed in a reverse direction.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to systems for controlling/assisting vehicles during backup operations, and in particular to a system that controls vehicle speed during parking or trailer backup operations.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Backing up a vehicle with a trailer can be a difficult task. In conventional motor vehicles, the operator must control the steering and vehicle speed while the vehicle is moving in reverse. Trailer backup assist systems have been developed to assist operators when backing up a vehicle having a trailer attached thereto.


Motor vehicles may also include active park assist systems that assist a driver during vehicle parking operations. Such systems may be configured to provide automated parking. During parking operations, the vehicle may be moved in a reverse direction.


The path that a vehicle is capable of following in reverse is limited by the design of the vehicle and trailer (if present), and road conditions. Furthermore, the path that a vehicle (and trailer) is capable of in a reverse direction may be more limited at higher vehicle speeds.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One aspect of the present invention is a trailer backup assist system for motor vehicles. The trailer backup assist system includes an auxiliary user input feature that can be used by a vehicle operator to provide a steering curvature command corresponding to a desired vehicle path curvature without requiring a user to move a steering wheel of the motor vehicle. The trailer backup assist system is configured to control a vehicle speed while the vehicle is backing up with a trailer attached thereto utilizing an input comprising at least one of a steering curvature command and an angle of a trailer relative to the vehicle. The trailer backup assist system generates a command to control at least one of a brake system, an engine torque, and a transmission gear selection to thereby control vehicle speed in a reverse direction based, at least in part, on the steering curvature command and/or the angle of a trailer relative to the vehicle.


Another aspect of the present invention is a method of controlling a speed of a motor vehicle in a reverse direction when a trailer is connected to the motor vehicle. The method includes utilizing at least one of a trailer angle and a steering curvature command from an auxiliary user input feature positioned in a vehicle interior as a control input. The method further includes controlling vehicle speed in a reverse direction based at least in part on the control input.


Another aspect of the present invention is a method of controlling a speed of a motor vehicle when the motor vehicle is traveling in a reverse direction. The method includes determining a desired vehicle path in a reverse direction based at least in part on a steering command. The method also includes determining an acceptable error criteria relative to the desired vehicle path. A speed of the vehicle is limited by controlling at least one of a vehicle brake, an engine torque, and an automatic gear selection such that the vehicle is capable of moving in a reverse direction along the desired vehicle path within the acceptable error criteria.


These and other aspects, objects, and features of the present invention will be understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art upon studying the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the drawings:



FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a motor vehicle including a trailer backup assist system according to one aspect of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a fragmentary view of a portion of a vehicle interior including an auxiliary steering input that can be utilized by a vehicle operator when the vehicle is backing up with a trailer attached thereto;



FIG. 3 is a graph showing a steering angle as a function of time.



FIG. 4 is a schematic plan view of a motor vehicle and a trailer at various positions along a vehicle path; and



FIG. 5 is a graph showing maximum allowable vehicle speed versus trailer angle; and



FIG. 6 is a partially schematic plan view showing a vehicle parking operation.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

For purposes of description herein, the terms “upper,” “lower,” “right,” “left,” “rear,” “front,” “vertical,” “horizontal,” and derivatives thereof shall relate to the invention as oriented in FIG. 4. However, it is to be understood that the invention may assume various alternative orientations and step sequences, except where expressly specified to the contrary. It is also to be understood that the specific devices and processes illustrated in the attached drawings, and described in the following specification, are simply exemplary embodiments of the inventive concepts defined in the appended claims. Hence, specific dimensions and other physical characteristics relating to the embodiments disclosed herein are not to be considered as limiting, unless the claims expressly state otherwise.


With reference to FIG. 1, a motor vehicle 1 according to one aspect of the present invention includes a trailer backup assist system 2 that can be utilized by a vehicle operator to assist the operator when the motor vehicle 1 is backing up with a trailer 10 attached thereto. The trailer backup assist system 2 includes a trailer backup steering input apparatus 4 that is operably connected to a trailer back-up assist control module 6. The trailer backup assist system 2 further includes a hitch angle detection apparatus 8 that is operably connected to the trailer back-up assist control module 6.


The trailer back-up assist control module 6 is operably connected to a brake system control module 12 and a power system control module 14. The vehicle 1 also includes a power steering assist system 16 including a power steering assist control module 18 and a steering angle detection apparatus 20. The power steering assist control module 18 is operably connected to the trailer backup assist control module 6. Trailer 10 may include a hitch angle detection component 22 that is operably connected to the hitch angle detection apparatus 8 of vehicle 1. Hitch angle detection component 22 is configured to measure the angle of trailer 10 relative to vehicle 1 about a vertical axis. A trailer angle of zero generally corresponds to an operating condition wherein the trailer 10 is aligned with vehicle 1 such that the vehicle 1 and trailer 10 move along a straight path. Hitch angle detection component 22 may also be configured to measure an orientation of trailer 10 relative to vehicle 1 about a first horizontal axis that extends side-to-side, and a second horizontal axis that extends in a vehicle fore-aft direction. This enables the trailer backup assist system 2 to determine if trailer 10 has begun to move up a slope and/or if trailer 10 has twisted relative to vehicle 1 due to moving onto a surface that is sloped to the side. It will be understood that various hitch angle detection/measuring devices may be utilized, and the components may be mounted on vehicle 1, on trailer 10, or on both. The vehicle 1, trailer backup assist system 2, trailer 10, and related components of FIG. 1 are described in detail in The Related Patents and Patent Applications, such that these components will not be described in detail herein.


Vehicle 1 may also include an active park assist system 30 to provide automated or assisted vehicle parking. The active park assist system 30 may be operably connected to one or more of the trailer backup assist system 2, trailer backup steering input apparatus 4, trailer backup assist control module 6, hitch angle detection apparatus 8, trailer 10, brake system control module 12, power train system control module 14 and power steering assist system 16, power steering assist control module 18, and steering angle detection apparatus 20. As discussed in more detail below in connection with FIG. 4, the active park assist system 30 may be utilized by a vehicle operator during vehicle parking operations either with or without a trailer 10 being connected to vehicle 1.


With further reference to FIG. 2, an auxiliary user input such as a rotatable knob 25 may be mounted to a vehicle interior component such as a center console 26. Upon activation of the trailer backup assist system 2, a user can rotate knob 25 to provide a user steering request to the power steering assist system 16. During vehicle backup operations, a user can utilize the knob 25 to provide steering input rather than rotating the vehicle steering wheel. More specifically, the angular position of the rotatable knob 25 may correlate to a desired curvature, such that rotation of the knob 25 to a different angular position provides a different desired curvature with an incremental change based on the amount of rotation. As discussed in more detail below, the trailer backup assist system 2 and/or the active park assist system may be configured to generate steering command signals to change the wheel angle of the steered wheels. The steering command signals may be directly proportional to the user steering request, or the system may override or modify the steering request to generate steering command signals. The rotatable knob 25 may be biased (e.g., by a spring return) to a center or at-rest position P(AR) between opposing rotational ranges of motion R(R), R(L). In the illustrated embodiment, a first one of the opposing rotational ranges of motion R(R) is substantially equal to a second one of the opposing rotational ranges of motion R(L), R(R). To provide a tactile indication of an amount of rotation of the rotatable knob 25, a force that biases the knob toward the at-rest position P(AR) can increase (e.g., non-linearly) as a function of the amount of rotation of the rotatable knob 25 with respect to the at-rest position P(AR). Additionally, the rotatable knob 25 can be configured with position indicating detents such that the driver can positively feel the at-rest position P(AR) and feel the ends of the opposing rotational ranges of motion R(L), R(R) approaching (e.g., soft end stops). The auxiliary user input knob 25 and operation thereof is described in detail in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 9,504,434, such that a detailed description of this aspect of the trailer backup assist system 2 is not included herein.


With further reference to FIG. 3, a steering angle (“pinion angle”) versus time for a motor vehicle 1 may include a lag between a controller steering request/command (line 34) and the actual or “absolute” steering angle (line 36). Specifically, if a steering request or command is generated at a time t=0.0 as designated 32 in FIG. 3, a pinion angle command (line 34) is input into the power steering assist system 16. However, due to the time lag in the system, the absolute steering angle follows the dashed line designated 36 in FIG. 3. This results in a deviation angle Δθ whereby the absolute pinion angle 36 is less than the command 34. In the illustrated example, the Request Ramp Time (RRT) is 0.8 seconds. After 0.8 seconds, the pinion angle request line 34 transitions to a horizontal line segment 34a. After 1.0 seconds the absolute steering angle 36 reaches a transition point 38, and transitions to a horizontal line segment 36a. This defines a maximum delay “DT” of 0.2 seconds. In the illustrated example, the horizontal line segment 36a is spaced below line segment 34a to define a maximum static deviation (“MSD”) of about 2.0°. The upwardly curved line segment 36b represents an “overshoot” of the absolute steering angle 36 that may be as great as 2.0° relative to the horizontal static steering angle 36a. In the illustrated example, the pinion angle request 34a corresponds to a pinion angle of 400°. The angle of the steered wheels (typically the front wheels) of a vehicle relative to the pinion angle of FIG. 3 varies depending on the gear ratios in the steering system, and the relationship between the pinion angle and the wheel angle may be nonlinear. In the illustrated example, the pinion angle 400° corresponds to a wheel angle of about 22°. It will be understood that FIG. 3 illustrates a typical steering response. However, the actual dynamic and static variations of the steering angle relative to a steering command angle will vary from vehicle-to-vehicle. As discussed in more detail below, the trailer backup assist system 2 (FIG. 1) and/or the active park assist system 30 may be configured to take into account the steering angle time lag and steering angle variations illustrated in FIG. 3 to determine steering angle commands based on steering wheel angle requests and vehicle operating parameters.


With further reference to FIG. 4, a vehicle 1 and trailer 10 move along a path 40 as they back up. The path 40 may include a portion 40A having a smaller radius, and a portion 40B that is substantially straight, or has a very large radius. The trailer angle is zero when path 40 is straight, and increases as the radius of the path portion 40A decreases. Thus, the trailer angle between vehicle 1 and trailer 10 will be greater in the path portions 40A than the relatively straight path portions 40B. The trailer backup assist system 2 may be configured to limit the speed of vehicle 1 and trailer 10 during backup to a maximum speed. For example, when the operator actuates the trailer backup assist system and utilizes the auxiliary user input knob 25 (FIG. 2), the trailer backup assist system 2 may limit the speed of vehicle 1 to 10 mph, even when the trailer angle is zero degrees and the vehicle 1 and trailer 10 are moving along a straight portion 40B of path 40. However, according to one aspect of the present invention, if the vehicle 1 and trailer 10 are following a portion 40A of path 40 having a relatively small radius of curvature, the speed of the vehicle 10 may be limited by the trailer backup assist system 2 to a speed that is less than 10 mph to ensure that control is maintained and to avoid jackknifing.


The trailer backup assist system 2 may be configured to limit vehicle speeds in reverse when a trailer 10 is attached to vehicle 1 to ensure that vehicle 1 can be controlled and to prevent jackknifing or other problematic operating conditions. FIG. 5 illustrates various ways to map maximum allowable vehicle speed as a function of trailer angle. In use, the trailer angle can be measured while the vehicle 1 is backing up, and the trailer backup assist system 2 limits the vehicle speed using, for example, the vehicle brakes or drivetrain such that the vehicle 1 does not exceed the maximum allowable speed even if a vehicle operator attempts to back up at a higher speed by depressing the accelerator pedal. With further reference to FIG. 5, line 42 represents a maximum allowable vehicle speed at different trailer angles. In the illustrated example, the line 42 is a straight line, and the maximum vehicle speed at a trailer angle of 0° is 10 mph, and the maximum allowable vehicle speed is reduced to 0 at a trailer angle of 90°. It will be understood that the maximum vehicle speed may be reduced to 0 at a lower trailer angle (e.g. 60°) as shown by the line 44. Also, as shown by the line 46, the maximum vehicle speed may not be limited to speed that is below 10 mph until a trailer angle of significantly greater than 0° (e.g. 30°) is reached, and the maximum vehicle speed may then be limited by a straight line that goes to 0 at a predefined trailer angle (e.g. 60°). In FIG. 5, the line 46 includes a segment 46a that is horizontal until the trailer angle reaches 30°, and the maximum allowable vehicle speed then transitions linearly to 0 as shown by the line segment 46b. The maximum allowable vehicle speed as a function of the trailer angle may also be non-linear (e.g. parabolic) as shown by the dashed lines 44 and 50.


The maximum allowable vehicle speed for a given trailer angle may be determined empirically to provide a plurality of pairs of data points, and the data may be interpolated utilizing a curve fit to thereby generate a line representing the maximum allowable vehicle speed as a function of the trailer angle. Alternatively, the maximum allowable vehicle speed as a function of a trailer angle may be modeled utilizing a straight (linear) line of the form y=mx+b, or a curved (nonlinear) line of the form y=mx2+cx+b, or other suitable equation.


The trailer backup assist system 2 and/or active park assist system 30 may also take into account other variables to determine the maximum allowable vehicle speed for a given operating condition. For example, the curves illustrated in FIG. 5 may be modified to account for hill angles. Specifically, if the vehicle 1 and trailer 10 are backing up a hill, the maximum allowable vehicle speed may be reduced for a given (measured) trailer angle. The hill angle may be measured utilizing a gravity sensor on board vehicle 1, or it may be measured utilizing a sensor in hitch 52 (FIG. 4) interconnecting vehicle 1 and trailer 10. Additional variables such as road conditions may also be utilized to adjust the maximum allowable vehicle speed at a given trailer angle. For example, the vehicle 1 may include sensors that enable the trailer backup assist system to determine if the vehicle is on loose gravel, wet pavement, or other surface having reduced traction. If the vehicle 1 and/or trailer 10 are on a gravel or wet surface, the maximum allowable vehicle speed for a given trailer angle may be further reduced to ensure that the operator can maintain control of the trailer 10 during the backup operations.


Also, the hill angle may be determined utilizing topographical information that may be stored by the trailer backup assist system 2 or obtained utilizing a GPS system. Vehicle 1 may include an electronic compass or other device whereby the location and orientation of vehicle 1 on a topographical map may be determined, such that the hill angle of the vehicle 1 and trailer 10 can be determined.


Also, road condition data can be obtained from a remote source, and the maximum allowable vehicle speed can be adjusted if required. For example, if weather data in the vicinity of vehicle 1 indicates that it is raining or snowing, the maximum allowable vehicle speed for a given (measured) trailer angle may be reduced to account for the decrease in traction. Similarly, map data concerning the road surface (e.g. gravel or paved road) may be utilized to adjust the maximum allowable vehicle speed as a function of trailer angle.


In operation, a user actuates the trailer backup assist system 2, and begins to back up the vehicle 1 and trailer 10. The user utilizes the auxiliary user input knob 25 to provide steering requests to the trailer backup assist system 2. The trailer backup assist system 2 utilizes vehicle speed and trailer angle data to determine a maximum allowable vehicle speed, taking into account road conditions and the like as discussed above.


In general, the trailer backup assist system 2 can ensure that the vehicle 1 and trailer 10 do not exceed the maximum vehicle speed versus trailer angle criteria of FIG. 5 by limiting the speed of the vehicle, limiting the trailer angle, or both. Limiting the vehicle speed can be accomplished by sending a command to the brake system control module 12 and/or the power train system control module 14. The brake system control module 12 can be utilized to apply the brakes of the vehicle and/or the brakes of a trailer 10 if the trailer 10 is equipped with brakes. Also, the power train control module 14 can be utilized to limit the amount of torque generated by the vehicle's engine and/or by down shifting the engine transmission to utilize engine braking if the vehicle 1 has an internal combustion engine. If the vehicle 1 has an electric motor, the powertrain system control module may utilize the electric motor to provide braking. The trailer backup assist system 2 may also be configured to increase the vehicle speed if the vehicle speed and trailer angle are within the allowable limits.


The trailer backup assist system 2 may also be configured to control the angle of the steering wheels to ensure that the vehicle speed versus trailer angle (FIG. 5) does not exceed the allowable limits. In this case, the trailer backup assist system 2 will limit the angle of the steered wheels to a level that is lower than the input request by the user utilizing the knob 25 (FIG. 2) to prevent the trailer angle from exceeding the allowable limits for a given vehicle speed. Thus, the trailer backup assist system 2 may “override” a user steering request and generate a steering command that comprises a reduced steering angle relative to the user steering request. For example, if the vehicle 1 is traveling in reverse at 10 mph, and an operator rapidly rotates the knob 25, the trailer backup assist system 2 may apply the brakes to slow the vehicle, but the capability of the system may not allow the speed of the vehicle to be reduced quickly enough to permit the vehicle to follow the steering input by the user. In this case, the trailer backup assist system 2 may generate a steering command to the power steering system that is reduced to avoid unacceptable operating conditions (i.e. too tight of a turn for the vehicle speed). Also, if vehicle 1 is traveling at a very slow speed (e.g. 1.0 mph), the trailer angle is still limited due to the physical constraints of the interface between the vehicle 1 and trailer 10. Thus, the trailer backup assist system 2 may be configured to modify user steering requests and to limit the commands to the power steering system to a maximum value that may be less than an input request by a user utilizing the knob 25.


Furthermore, trailer backup assist system 2 may be configured to prioritize the user-requested steering input from knob 25 over the vehicle speed when determining whether to limit the vehicle speed or limit the turn angle to avoid the maximum allowable values as shown in FIG. 5. In general, the input provided by a user to the knob 25 corresponds to a desired vehicle path (e.g. vehicle path 40; FIG. 4), and the trailer backup assist system 2 may be configured to assume that the desired path is more important than the desired speed. Thus, the trailer backup assist system 2 may be configured to first adjust the vehicle speed to stay within the maximum allowable vehicle speed shown in FIG. 5, followed by (in terms of priority) limiting the steering angle if required to stay within the allowable limits shown in FIG. 5.


Also, as discussed above in connection with FIG. 3, the actual steering angle may lag the steering angle request, and the final (static) steering angle may be somewhat less than the steering request. The trailer backup assist system 2 may be configured to optimize the vehicle speed in reverse to follow the desired path 40 (FIG. 4) within an acceptable error. This allows the system to keep the steering speed within an optimum range to help keep the vehicle 1 on the desired path 40 with an acceptable amount of error. In general, the required speed of the steering system is a function of the vehicle speed and the lateral movement needed to follow the desired path 40. For example, the steering speeds required to follow a particular lateral change in path increase with vehicle speed. Likewise, the steering speeds required at a particular vehicle speed increase as the change in lateral movement increases.


Vehicle speed may also be controlled during parking operations if the vehicle 1 is on a sloped surface. As shown in FIG. 6, a vehicle 60 (with no trailer attached) may be parked utilizing the active park assist system 30. In general, vehicle 60 is initially travelling adjacent parked cars 62 and 64, and the vehicle 60 is initially spaced apart from the parked cars 62 and 64 by a distance “PD.” After the vehicle 60 passes a parking space 66 between parked vehicles 62 and 64, the active park assist system 30 is actuated by the operator, and the vehicle 60 travels in a reverse direction along a path shown by arrows 68. The parking space 66 is generally rectangular, and has a slot depth “SD” and a slot length “SL.” The active park assist system 30 may be configured to limit vehicle speed based on road conditions (e.g. gravel) and/or the hill angle (e.g. topographical map data) that is encountered by vehicle 60.


The steering lag shown in FIG. 3 can be utilized by the trailer backup assist system 2 when a vehicle 1 is backing up with a trailer 10 (FIG. 4), and when a vehicle 60 without a trailer is being parked (FIG. 6). In either case, the trailer backup assist system 2 or the active park assist system 30 determine a desired vehicle path based on a user input utilizing knob 25 (FIG. 2) or based on a calculated path determined by active park assist system 30.


In general, the vehicle speed and steering can be controlled to optimize the vehicle path in any combination. For example, the power train system control module 14 (FIG. 1) may be controlled to control the torque output. The torque output can be monitored and modified to help maintain the optimum speed to support the capability of the steering system to position the vehicle on a desired path. The power train torque output may be limited to reduce the speed of the vehicle when needed by the steering system to keep the vehicle path error within a desirable range. Similarly, the brake torque generated may also be monitored and modified to help maintain the optimum speed to support the capability of the steering system to position the vehicle on a desired path. The brake system control module 12 may be actuated to reduce the speed of the vehicle when needed by the steering system to keep the path error within a desirable range. Furthermore, the automatic gear selection of the vehicle may be controlled, and the vehicle may down shift to facilitate engine braking and reduce the risk of overheating the braking system. Still further, if the vehicle is backing up with a trailer attached, and if the trailer has trailer brakes, the trailer brake torque may be monitored and modified to help maintain the optimum speed to support the capability of the steering system to position the vehicle on a desired path. The trailer brake torque may be applied to help reduce the speed of the vehicle when needed by the steering system to keep the path error within a desirable range.


In addition to the automated control discussed above, the vehicle may also include a warning system that alerts a user when the vehicle speed and/or steering angle are excessive, such that the desired path cannot be achieved by the vehicle. For example, the vehicle 1 may include a visual display (not shown), or the vehicle may be operably connected to an operator's smart device such as a cell phone or tablet. An illuminated camera display, heads up display, illuminated mirrors (text) or schematic screen displays may be used with a variety of color, intensity, and blank frequencies to provide feedback to the driver that a collision mitigation function is active and/or to help guide the driver to avoid the collision. The vehicle may also be configured to provide audible tones or voice commands utilizing speakers in the vehicle and/or a driver's smart device (e.g. cell phone) to instruct the driver how to avoid a collision, or to inform the driver that an automated collision mitigation function is active. Still further, a steering wheel torque and/or vibration may be utilized to help a driver avoid a collision or to inform the driver that an automated collision mitigation function is active. Other subsystems or devices such as phones, tablets, vibrating seats, or the like may also be used to warn a driver. The frequency of the vibration can be changed to convey additional information about the probability of the collision.


Numerous communication/warning arrangements may be utilized to convey information to the driver. Such devices may include, without limitation, the vehicle audio system, park aid speakers, text display, navigation system, reverse camera system, messaging seats, joystick, a steering wheel, mirrors, a mobile phone, a mobile computing device, and/or a mobile gaming device.


It will be understood that the vehicle may be configured to utilize the speed and trajectory control and/or warning features discussed above when the vehicle is traveling in a forward direction with or without a trailer, and when the vehicle is traveling in a reverse direction with or without a trailer.


It is to be understood that variations and modifications can be made on the aforementioned structure without departing from the concepts of the present invention, and further it is to be understood that such concepts are intended to be covered by the following claims unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise.

Claims
  • 1. A trailer backup assist system for motor vehicles, the trailer backup assist system comprising: an auxiliary input feature in a vehicle interior that can be used by a vehicle operator to provide a user steering curvature request while the vehicle is backing up with a trailer attached thereto corresponding to a desired vehicle path without requiring a user to move a steering wheel;wherein the trailer backup assist system is configured to control an angle of steered wheels and a vehicle speed while the vehicle is backing up with a trailer attached thereto utilizing inputs including a user speed request, a user steering curvature request from the auxiliary input feature while the vehicle is backing up with a trailer attached thereto, and a measured trailer angle comprising an angle of a trailer relative to the vehicle that is measured while the vehicle is backing up with a trailer attached thereto, and wherein the trailer backup assist system is configured to generate commands overriding user steering curvature requests and user speed requests, and wherein the trailer backup assist system is configured to generate a command to control at least one of a brake system, an engine torque, and a transmission gear selection to thereby limit vehicle speed in a reverse direction;wherein the trailer backup assist system is configured to utilize a predefined vehicle speed verses trailer angle relationship defining a plurality of non-equal maximum vehicle speeds as a function of trailer angle to limit vehicle speed in a reverse direction to a maximum vehicle speed determined from the predefined speed verses angle relationship based on the measured trailer angle, and to limit trailer angle to a maximum trailer angle determined from the predefined speed verses angle relationship; andwherein the trailer backup assist system is configured to prioritize user steering curvature requests over user speed requests.
  • 2. The trailer backup assist system of claim 1, wherein: the brake system comprises a vehicle brake system.
  • 3. The trailer backup assist system of claim 1, wherein: the trailer backup assist system limits vehicle speed in a reverse direction as a function of a steering curvature request by a user that is input while the vehicle is backing up with a trailer attached thereto.
  • 4. The trailer backup assist system of claim 1, wherein: the trailer backup assist system is configured to override an operator steering curvature request if a reduction in vehicle speed due to overriding an operator speed request is insufficient to avoid exceeding a maximum trailer angle determined from the predefined speed verses angle relationship.
  • 5. The trailer backup assist system of claim 4, wherein: the trailer backup assist system is configured to limit vehicle speed during backup to a predefined maximum speed when the measured trailer angle is zero.
  • 6. The trailer backup assist system of claim 1, wherein: the maximum allowable speed varies linearly as a function of at least one of a trailer angle and a steering request of a user.
  • 7. The trailer backup assist system of claim 1, including: a brake system control module;a powertrain system control module;a hitch angle detection apparatus; andwherein the trailer backup assist system is configured to obtain a trailer angle from the hitch angle detection apparatus while the vehicle is backing up with a trailer attached thereto and to generate a command to at least one of the brake system control module and the powertrain system control module to limit a maximum vehicle speed in a reverse direction while the vehicle is backing up with a trailer attached thereto.
  • 8. The trailer backup assist system of claim 1, wherein: the auxiliary user input feature comprises a rotatable knob configured to be mounted in a vehicle interior.
  • 9. A method of controlling a speed of a motor vehicle moving in a reverse direction when a trailer is connected to the motor vehicle, the method comprising; determining a maximum allowable vehicle speed in a reverse direction based, at least in part, on predefined criteria defining a plurality of non-equal predefined maximum vehicle speeds as a function of at least one of a trailer angle and a steering curvature command;utilizing control input comprising at least one of a measured trailer angle that is measured while the motor vehicle is moving in a reverse direction with a trailer attached thereto and a user steering request that is input from an auxiliary user input positioned in a vehicle interior while the motor vehicle is moving in a reverse direction with a trailer attached thereto; andcontrolling an angle of steered wheels of the vehicle and vehicle speed in a reverse direction based at least in part on the control input and the predefined criteria, wherein user steering curvature requests are prioritized over user speed requests.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, including: utilizing at least one of a vehicle brake system and a trailer brake system to limit vehicle speed in a reverse direction.
  • 11. The method of claim 9, including: controlling a vehicle transmission to limit vehicle speed.
  • 12. The method of claim 9, including: controlling at least one of a braking system, an engine torque, and a transmission gear selection to prevent the motor vehicle from exceeding the maximum allowable vehicle speed.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, including: measuring a trailer angle; and wherein:the maximum allowable vehicle speed is a linear function of the trailer angle.
  • 14. The method of claim 12, including: overriding a user steering curvature request if reductions in speed due to overriding user speed requests are insufficient to avoid violating the predefined criteria.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/618,368, filed Feb. 10, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,286,950, which issued on May 14, 2019, entitled “SPEED OPTIMIZED TRAJECTORY CONTROL FOR MOTOR VEHICLES,” the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. This patent application is related to U.S. Pat. No. 9,493,187, which was issued on Nov. 15, 2016, entitled “CONTROL FOR TRAILER BACKUP ASSIST SYSTEM” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Pat. No. 9,374,562, which issued on Jun. 21, 2016, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CALCULATING A HORIZONTAL CAMERA TO TARGET DISTANCE,” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Pat. No. 9,513,103, which issued on Dec. 6, 2016, entitled “HITCH ANGLE SENSOR ASSEMBLY,” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Pat. No. 9,290,202, which issued on Mar. 22, 2016, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD OF CALIBRATING A TRAILER BACKUP ASSIST SYSTEM,” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/188,213, which was filed on Feb. 24, 2014, entitled “SENSOR SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING TRAILER HITCH ANGLE,” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/847,508, which was filed on Mar. 20, 2013, entitled “HITCH ANGLE ESTIMATION.” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/188,213 is also a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. Pat. No. 9,346,396, which was issued on May 24, 2016, entitled “SUPPLEMENTAL VEHICLE LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR VISION BASED TARGET DETECTION,” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Pat. No. 9,102,271, which was issued on Aug. 11, 2015, entitled “TRAILER MONITORING SYSTEM AND METHOD,” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Pat. No. 9,248,858, which was issued on Feb. 2, 2016, entitled “TRAILER BACKUP ASSIST SYSTEM,” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Pat. No. 8,825,328 which was issued on Sep. 2, 2014, entitled “DETECTION OF AND COUNTERMEASURES FOR JACKKNIFE ENABLING CONDITIONS DURING TRAILER BACKUP ASSIST,” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Pat. No. 8,909,426, which was issued on Dec. 9, 2014, entitled “TRAILER PATH CURVATURE CONTROL FOR TRAILER BACKUP ASSIST,” which claims benefit from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/477,132, which was filed on Apr. 19, 2011, entitled “TRAILER BACKUP ASSIST CURVATURE CONTROL.” The aforementioned related applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. The above-identified patents and patent applications may be collectively referred to herein as “The Related Patents and Patent Applications.”

US Referenced Citations (174)
Number Name Date Kind
3542390 Fikse Nov 1970 A
3756624 Taylor Sep 1973 A
3860257 Mesly Jan 1975 A
4042132 Bohman et al. Aug 1977 A
4735432 Brown Apr 1988 A
4752080 Rogers Jun 1988 A
4754828 Morishita Jul 1988 A
4848499 Martinet et al. Jul 1989 A
5001639 Breen Mar 1991 A
5108158 Breen Apr 1992 A
5246242 Penzotti Sep 1993 A
5247442 Kendall Sep 1993 A
5558350 Kimbrough et al. Sep 1996 A
5586814 Steiner Dec 1996 A
6042196 Nakamura et al. Mar 2000 A
6056371 Lin et al. May 2000 A
6292094 Deng et al. Sep 2001 B1
6351698 Kubota et al. Feb 2002 B1
6409288 Yoshida et al. Jun 2002 B2
6494476 Masters et al. Dec 2002 B2
6498977 Wetzel et al. Dec 2002 B2
6567731 Chandy May 2003 B2
6838979 Deng et al. Jan 2005 B2
6854557 Deng et al. Feb 2005 B1
7032705 Zheng et al. Apr 2006 B2
7117077 Michi et al. Oct 2006 B2
7136754 Hahn et al. Nov 2006 B2
7139650 Lubischer Nov 2006 B2
7154385 Lee et al. Dec 2006 B2
7165820 Rudd, III Jan 2007 B2
7219913 Atley May 2007 B2
7319927 Sun et al. Jan 2008 B1
7690737 Lu Apr 2010 B2
7796944 Tanaka et al. Apr 2010 B2
7715953 Shepard May 2010 B2
7793965 Padula Sep 2010 B2
7969326 Sakakibara Jun 2011 B2
8010253 Lundquist Aug 2011 B2
8027773 Ahn Sep 2011 B2
8033955 Farnsworth Oct 2011 B2
8036792 Dechamp Oct 2011 B2
8108116 Mori et al. Jan 2012 B2
8170726 Chen et al. May 2012 B2
8244442 Craig et al. Aug 2012 B2
8260518 Englert Sep 2012 B2
8267485 Barlsen et al. Sep 2012 B2
8280607 Gatti et al. Oct 2012 B2
8374749 Tanaka Feb 2013 B2
8430792 Noll Apr 2013 B2
8469125 Yu et al. Jun 2013 B2
8571758 Klier et al. Oct 2013 B2
8755982 Heckel et al. Jun 2014 B2
8755984 Rupp et al. Jun 2014 B2
8798860 Dechamp Aug 2014 B2
8825328 Rupp et al. Sep 2014 B2
8909426 Rhode et al. Dec 2014 B2
8930140 Trombley et al. Jan 2015 B2
9047778 Cazanas Jun 2015 B1
9102271 Trombley et al. Aug 2015 B2
9108598 Headley Aug 2015 B2
9132856 Shepard Sep 2015 B2
9156496 Greenwood et al. Oct 2015 B2
9164955 Lavoie et al. Oct 2015 B2
9180890 Lu et al. Nov 2015 B2
9227474 Liu Jan 2016 B2
9229453 Lee Jan 2016 B1
9238483 Hafner et al. Jan 2016 B2
9248858 Lavoie et al. Feb 2016 B2
9290202 Lavoie Mar 2016 B2
9315212 Kyrtsos et al. Apr 2016 B1
9340228 Ku et al. Apr 2016 B2
9335162 Kyrtsos et al. May 2016 B2
9346396 Nave et al. May 2016 B2
9374562 Trombley et al. Jun 2016 B2
9493187 Pilutti et al. Nov 2016 B2
9500497 Lavoie et al. Nov 2016 B2
9513103 Crossman Dec 2016 B2
20010037164 Hecker Nov 2001 A1
20010052434 Ehrlich et al. Dec 2001 A1
20040143416 Hattori Jul 2004 A1
20040222881 Deng Nov 2004 A1
20050206224 Lu Sep 2005 A1
20050206225 Offerle et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050206229 Lu et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050236201 Spannheimer et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050236896 Offerle et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060103511 Lee et al. May 2006 A1
20060142936 Dix Jun 2006 A1
20060229782 Deng Oct 2006 A1
20060235589 Deng Oct 2006 A1
20070027581 Bauer et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070198190 Bauer et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080177443 Lee et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080231701 Greenwood et al. Sep 2008 A1
20090082935 Leschuk et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090157260 Lee Jun 2009 A1
20090198425 Englert Aug 2009 A1
20090271078 Dickinson Oct 2009 A1
20090306854 Dechamp Dec 2009 A1
20090306861 Schumann et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326775 Nishida Dec 2009 A1
20100063702 Sabelstrom Mar 2010 A1
20100152989 Smith et al. Jun 2010 A1
20110087398 Lu et al. Apr 2011 A1
20120041658 Turner Feb 2012 A1
20120095649 Klier et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120123642 Kojo May 2012 A1
20120200706 Greenwood et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120271512 Rupp et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271514 Lavoie et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271515 Rhode et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271522 Rupp et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120283909 Dix Nov 2012 A1
20120310594 Watanabe Dec 2012 A1
20120316732 Auer Dec 2012 A1
20120323473 Irie Dec 2012 A1
20130148748 Suda Jun 2013 A1
20130179038 Goswami et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130268160 Trombley et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140052337 Lavoie Feb 2014 A1
20140058614 Trombley et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058622 Trombley et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058655 Trombley et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058668 Trombley et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140067154 Yu et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140067155 Yu et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140085472 Lu et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140121930 Allexi et al. May 2014 A1
20140133170 Nave et al. May 2014 A1
20140142798 Guarnizo Martinez May 2014 A1
20140160276 Pliefke et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140172232 Rupp et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140188344 Lavoie Jul 2014 A1
20140188346 Lavoie Jul 2014 A1
20140210456 Crossman Jul 2014 A1
20140218506 Trombley et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140218522 Lavoie et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140222288 Lavoie et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140236532 Trombley et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140249691 Hafner et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140249723 Pilutti et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140267688 Aich et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140267689 Lavoie Sep 2014 A1
20140267868 Mazzola et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140267869 Sawa Sep 2014 A1
20140277942 Kyrtsos et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140288769 Trombley et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140297128 Lavoie et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140297129 Lavoie et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303847 Lavoie Oct 2014 A1
20140309888 Smit et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140324295 Lavoie Oct 2014 A1
20140343793 Lavoie et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140343795 Lavoie Nov 2014 A1
20140358429 Shutko et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140379217 Rupp et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150057903 Rhode et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150066296 Trombley et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150066298 Sharma et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150120141 Lavoie et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150134183 Lavoie et al. May 2015 A1
20150138340 Lavoie May 2015 A1
20150158527 Hafner et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150203156 Hafner et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150210317 Hafner et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150217693 Pliefke Aug 2015 A1
20150232092 Fairgrieve et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150298738 Hoel Oct 2015 A1
20160001705 Greenwood et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160009288 Yu Jan 2016 A1
20160039456 Lavoie et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160052548 Singh et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160059888 Bradley et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160229452 Lavoie et al. Aug 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (29)
Number Date Country
202159367 Mar 2012 CN
3931518 Apr 1991 DE
9208595 Aug 1992 DE
10154612 May 2003 DE
102005043466 Mar 2007 DE
102005043467 Mar 2007 DE
102005043468 Mar 2007 DE
102006002294 Jul 2007 DE
102007029413 Jan 2009 DE
102006035021 Apr 2010 DE
102008043675 May 2010 DE
102009007990 Aug 2010 DE
102009012253 Sep 2010 DE
102010029184 Nov 2011 DE
0418653 Mar 1991 EP
1361543 Nov 2003 EP
1655191 May 2006 EP
1810913 Jul 2007 EP
2388180 Nov 2011 EP
2644477 Oct 2013 EP
2515379 Apr 1983 FR
09267762 Oct 1997 JP
10119739 May 1998 JP
2012166580 Sep 2012 JP
0044605 Aug 2000 WO
2012059207 May 2012 WO
2012103193 Aug 2012 WO
2013186208 Dec 2013 WO
2015187467 Dec 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (20)
Entry
Haviland, G S, “Automatic Brake Control for Trucks—What Good Is It?”, TRID, Society of Automotive Engineers, Sep. 1968, 1 pg.
Altafini, C.; Speranzon, A.; Wahlberg, B., “A Feedback Control Scheme for Reversing a Truck and Trailer Vehicle”, IEEE, Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transactions, Dec. 2001, vol. 17, No. 6, 2 pgs.
Olaudio Altafini, Alberto Speranzon, and Karl Henrik Johansson, “Hybrid Control of a Truck and Trailer Vehicle”, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, HSCC 2002, LNCS 2289; 2002, pp. 21-34.
Divelbiss, A.W.; Wen, J.T.; “Trajectory Tracking Control of a Car-Trailer System”, IEEE, Control Systems Technology, Aug. 6, 2002, vol. 5, No. 3, 1 pg.
Guanrong, Chen; Delin, Zhang; “Backing up a Truck-Trailer with Suboptimal Distance Trajectories”, IEEE, Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference, vol. 2, Aug. 6, 2002, New Orleans, LA, ISBN:0-7803-3645-3, 1 pg.
“Understanding Tractor-Trailer Performance”, Caterpillar, 2006, pp. 1-28.
C. Lundquist; W. Reinelt; O. Enqvist, “Back Driving Assistant for Passenger Cars with Trailer”, ZF Lenksysteme GmbH, Schwabisch Gmünd, Germany, 2006 (SAE Int'l) Jan. 2006, pp. 1-8.
Olof Enqvist, “AFS-Assisted Trailer Reversing,” Institutionen for systemteknik Deartment of Electrical Engineering, Jan. 27, 2006, 57 pgs.
Cedric Pradalier, Kane Usher, “Robust Trajectory Tracking for a Reversing Tractor-Trailer System”, (Draft), Field and Service Robotics Conference, CSIRO ICT Centre, Jul. 2007, 16 pages.
Hodo, D. W.; Hung, J.Y.; Bevly, D. M.; Millhouse, S., “Effects of Sensor Placement and Errors on Path Following Control of a Mobile Robot-Trailer System”, IEEE, American Control Conference, Jul. 30, 2007, 1 pg.
Cedric Pradalier, Kane Usher, “Experiments in Autonomous Reversing of a Tractor-Trailer System”, 6th International Conference on Field and Service Robotics, inria-00195700, Version 1, Dec. 2007, 10 pgs.
Zhe Leng; Minor, M., “A Simple Tractor-Trailer Backing Control Law for Path Following”, IEEE, Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) IEEE/RSJ International Conference, Oct. 2010, 2 pgs.
“2012 Edge—Trailer Towing Selector”, Brochure, Preliminary 2012 RV & Trailer Towing Guide Information, 2011, 3 pgs.
“Ford Super Duty: Truck Technologies”, Brochure, Sep. 2011, 2 pgs.
J. Roh; H. Lee; W. Chung, “Control of a Car with a Trailer Using the Driver Assistance System”, IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics; Phuket, Thailand, Dec. 2011, 1 pg.
Payne, M.L.;Hung, J.Y, and Bevy, D.M; “Control of a Robot-Trailer System Using a Single Non-Collacted Sensor”, IEEE, 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Oct. 25-28, 2012, 2 pgs.
“Optionally Unmanned Ground Systems for any Steering-Wheel Based Vehicle” Universal. Unmanned., Kairos Autonomi, website: http://www.kairosautonomi.com/pronto4_system.html, retrieved Sep. 26, 2014, 2 pgs.
Micah Steele, R. Brent Gillespie, “Shared Control Between Human and Machine: Using a Haptic Steering Wheel to Aid in Land Vehicle Guidance”, University of Michigan, Date Unknown, 5 pgs.
M. Khatib, H. Jaouni, R. Chatila, and J.P. Laumond; “Dynamic Path Modification for Car-Like Nonholonomic Mobile Robots,” IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Apr. 1997, 6 pages.
Sh. Azadi, H.R. Rezaei Nedamani, and R. Kazemi, “Automatic Parking of an Articulated Vehicle Using ANFIS”, Global Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology (ISSN: 2322-2441), 2013, pp. 93-104, Issue No. 14.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190210648 A1 Jul 2019 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14618368 Feb 2015 US
Child 16354366 US