Spent brewers' yeast based alternative meat

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11464243
  • Patent Number
    11,464,243
  • Date Filed
    Monday, January 10, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 11, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • USARIUM INC. (San Francisco, CA, US)
  • Examiners
    • Badr; Hamid R
    Agents
    • K&L Gates LLP
Abstract
Alternative meat from a material comprising spent brewers' yeast as the primary ingredient is provided herein. The product contains from 20% to 80% dry weight spent brewers' yeast, has a meaty flavor and texture, and a reduced RNA content, making it safe for human consumption.
Description
FIELD

The present disclosure relates to alternative meat made from spent brewer's yeast (SBY) as the primary ingredient with the inclusion of more than 20%.


BACKGROUND

Spent brewer's yeast is a by-product of the brewing industry. The spent yeast cells are removed at the end of the bulk fermentation. A small amount of it is used to start the next batch of fermentation, the remaining part of the spent yeast is discarded. This discarded yeast is high in nutrients, in particular proteins, vitamins, and minerals, as well as containing functional and biologically active compounds such as polyphenols, antioxidants, β-glucans and mannoproteins.


Production of meat substitutes from spent brewers yeast and soy protein as promising applications was described by D. L. Gibson and B. K. Dwivedi in Can Inst. Food Technol. J Vol 3, No. 3, 1970. Side effects concerns of high levels of yeast feeding on uric acid metabolism of young men, expressed by J. C. Edozien et al in Nature vol 228, 1970 set safe limits of Ribonucleic acid (RNA) for human diet at 2 g per day. Spent brewer's yeast contains about 10-15% of RNA, limiting the use of SBY in food applications by 20% inclusion.


Currently, the majority of the spent brewers' yeast is composted or used as animal feed. Animal agriculture contributes to climate change with greenhouse gas emissions, new methods of processing spent brewers' yeast for direct human consumption are required.


SUMMARY

Alternative meat from a material comprising spent brewers' yeast as the primary ingredient is provided herein. The product contains from 20% to 80% dry weight spent brewers' yeast, has a meaty flavor and texture, and a reduced RNA content, making it safe for human consumption.


It is understood that the inventions disclosed and described in this specification are not limited to the aspects summarized in this Summary. The reader will appreciate the foregoing details, as well as others, upon considering the following detailed description of various non-limiting and non-exhaustive aspects according to this disclosure.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The features and advantages of the examples, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent, and the examples will be better understood, by reference to the following description of embodiments taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a chicken skewer made according to Example #1.



FIG. 2 is a hop-char burger made according to Example #2.



FIG. 3 is a beef stew made according to Example #3;



FIG. 4 is a pulled pork lemongrass veggie bowl made according to Example #4.





The exemplifications set out herein illustrate certain embodiments, in one form, and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the appended claims in any manner.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF NON-LIMITING EMBODIMENTS

Various examples are described and illustrated herein to provide an overall understanding of the structure, function, and use of the disclosed methods, systems, compositions, and products. The various examples described and illustrated herein are non-limiting and non-exhaustive. Thus, the invention is not limited by the description of the various non-limiting and non-exhaustive examples disclosed herein. Rather, the invention is defined solely by the claims. The features and characteristics illustrated and/or described in connection with various examples may be combined with the features and characteristics of other examples. Such modifications and variations are intended to be included within the scope of this specification. As such, the claims may be amended to recite any features or characteristics expressly or inherently described in, or otherwise expressly or inherently supported by, this specification. Further, Applicant reserves the right to amend the claims to affirmatively disclaim features or characteristics that may be present in the prior art. The various examples disclosed and described in this specification can comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of the features and characteristics as variously described herein.


Any patent, publication, or other disclosure material identified herein is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety unless otherwise indicated but only to the extent that the incorporated material does not conflict with existing definitions, statements, or other disclosure material expressly set forth in this specification. As such, and to the extent necessary, the express disclosure as set forth in this specification supersedes any conflicting material incorporated by reference herein. Any material, or portion thereof, that is said to be incorporated by reference into this specification, but which conflicts with existing definitions, statements, or other disclosure material set forth herein, is only incorporated to the extent that no conflict arises between that incorporated material and the existing disclosure material. Applicant reserves the right to amend this specification to expressly recite any subject matter, or portion thereof, incorporated by reference herein.


Reference throughout the specification to “various examples,” “some examples,” “one example,” or “an example”, or the like, means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the example is included in at least one example. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in various examples,” “in some examples,” “in one example”, or “in an example”, or the like, in places throughout the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same example. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more examples. Thus, the particular features, structures, or characteristics illustrated or described in connection with one example may be combined, in whole or in part, with the features structures, or characteristics of one or more other examples without limitation. Such modifications and variations are intended to be included within the scope of the present examples.


In this specification, unless otherwise indicated, all numerical parameters are to be understood as being prefaced and modified in all instances by the term “about,” in which the numerical parameters possess the inherent variability characteristic of the underlying measurement techniques used to determine the numerical value of the parameter. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter described herein should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.


All ranges recited herein are inclusive of the endpoints of the recited ranges. For example, a range of “1 to 10” includes the endpoints 1 and 10. Also, any numerical range recited herein includes all sub-ranges subsumed within the recited range. For example, a range of “1 to 10” includes all sub-ranges between (and including) the recited minimum value of 1 and the recited maximum value of 10, that is, having a minimum value equal to or greater than 1 and a maximum value equal to or less than 10. Any maximum numerical limitation recited in this specification is intended to include all lower numerical limitations subsumed therein and any minimum numerical limitation recited in this specification is intended to include all higher numerical limitations subsumed therein. Accordingly, Applicant reserves the right to amend this specification, including the claims, to expressly recite any sub-range subsumed within the ranges expressly recited. All such ranges are inherently described in this specification.


The grammatical articles “a,” “an,” and “the,” as used herein, are intended to include “at least one” or “one or more,” unless otherwise indicated, even if “at least one” or “one or more” is expressly used in certain instances. Thus, the foregoing grammatical articles are used herein to refer to one or more than one (i.e., to “at least one”) of the particular identified elements. Further, the use of a singular noun includes the plural, and the use of a plural noun includes the singular, unless the context of the usage requires otherwise.


In this specification, unless otherwise indicated, all percentages (e.g., weight percent protein, percent protein, percent moisture) are to be understood as being based on weight.


Alternative meat from a material comprising spent brewers' yeast as the primary ingredient is provided herein. The product contains 30% dry weight spent brewers' yeast, 10% dry weight Soy protein isolate, has a meat-like appearance and palatability, 24.4% by weight total protein content similar to animal meat and 0.099% RNA by weight, which is unexpected.


Such a low RNA content allows safely eating up to 10 times the FDA recommended daily amount of protein, which is equivalent to about 2 kg of animal meat, which is 8 times higher than average daily meat consumption from red meat, poultry, and fish (boneless weight) in the US according to USDA.









TABLE 1







Methods for RNA reduction for increased SBY-based protein consumption
















Phosphate

Current






solution,

invention,






heat
Alkaline
mix of






shock,
Hydrolysis
30% SBY
Upper



Spent
Enzymatic
dialysis or
and heat
and 10%
safe level



brewers'
hydrolysis
washing
treatment,
Soy
of RNA



yeast
Marson,
Canepa,
Trevelyan,
protein
per day,



untreated
2020
1972
1976
isolate
g
















RNA level, %
10.00-15.00







RNA level for 50 g protein

3.33-5.00
1.67-2.00
0.57-2.39
0.20
<2


(according to FDA RDA








based on 2000 cal diet), g








RNA level for 60 g protein

4.00-6.00
2.00-2.40
0.68-2.87
0.24
<2


(average amount of protein








consumed from red meat,








poultry, and fish (boneless








weight) in the US), g








Safe amount of protein for

20.00-30.03
50.00-59.88
 41.84-175.44
492.93



daily consumption based








on RNA content, g








Maximum amount of meat

0.08-0.12
0.19-0.23
0.16-0.67
1.90



to eat safely per day








(based on animal








equivalent containing 26 g








protein per 100 g), kg









Spent brewers' yeast is a broad term, which describes spent yeast derived from multiple sources. In some embodiments, the source of spent yeast is chosen from spent brewers' yeast, spent distillers' yeast, surplus yeast from ethanol manufacturing, bakers' yeast, nutritional yeast. In some embodiments, the spent yeast is derived from various strains of Saccharomycetes class, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces pastorianus, Saccharomyces carlsbergensis, etc.


Although currently spent brewer's yeast is mostly used for human consumption in the dried form, the use of liquid spent brewer's yeast (containing about 8-11% solids) and liquid concentrated spent brewer's yeast (containing about 15-25% solids) may benefit the manufacturing of high moisture meat analogs, simultaneously reducing costs for drying. In some embodiments, the spent yeast can be used in the dry, concentrated, liquid form, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the spent yeast may contain from about 10% to about 100% solids. In some embodiments, the primary ingredient can be debittered, autolyzed, or hydrolyzed.


Co-extrusion of spent brewers' yeast with secondary protein ingredients clears the aftertaste, adds meaty flavor and BBQ-like color, and reduces costs for debittering and drying. Low RNA concentration allows to increase the inclusion of spent brewers' yeast and to tweak the appearance and the taste towards chicken, fish, beef, and pork-like applications, reducing costs for secondary ingredients such as maskers, bitter blockers, flavors, and colors resulting in costs cheaper than animal meat.


In various examples, the product can comprise 80% of the spent brewers' yeast and 20% secondary protein ingredients. In various examples, the product can comprise 70% of the spent brewers' yeast and 30% secondary protein ingredients. In various examples, the product can comprise 60% of the spent brewers' yeast and 40% secondary protein ingredients. In various examples, the product can comprise 50% of the spent brewers' yeast and 50% secondary protein ingredients. In various examples, the product can comprise 40% of the spent brewers' yeast and 60% secondary protein ingredients. In various examples, the product can comprise 30% of the spent brewers' yeast and 70% secondary protein ingredients. In various examples, the product can comprise 20% of the spent brewers' yeast and 80% secondary protein ingredients.


Co-extrusion of spent brewers' yeast with secondary protein ingredients in their native form helped to improve succulent mouthfeel because of native fiber, capable of retaining more moisture without adding gums and binders. In some embodiments, the secondary protein ingredient is chosen from vegetable protein in its native, concentrated or isolated form, microbial protein, fungal protein, animal protein, cultured protein, or a combination thereof.


Despite having meat-like characteristics, spent brewers' yeast-based food products may benefit from the inclusion of secondary ingredients enhancing the sensory properties of the finished product. In some embodiments, the spent brewers' yeast food product may contain fat, carbohydrate, flavor, color, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the ingredients may contain 1-15% Fat, 0.5-2% dry weight Calcium Chloride, 0.5-1.5% dry weight gums (such as Sodium Alginate), 0.2-0.6% dry weight Lecithin.


Given different serving sizes set for different food products in some embodiments, the RNA content in the food product is easier to calculate as less than 4% of the food product's protein dry weight. In some embodiments, the RNA content in the food product is better to calculate as less than 2 g per serving.


EXAMPLES

The present disclosure will be more fully understood by reference to the following examples, which provide illustrative non-limiting aspects of the invention. It is understood that the invention described in this specification is not necessarily limited to the examples described in this section.


Example 1—Chicken Skewers, 22.2% by Weight Dry Equivalent of Spent Brewers Yeast

65% by weight liquid spent brewers' yeast, containing 11% solids, containing 49.6% protein, and 15% by weight dried spent brewers yeast, containing 51.2% protein were mixed with 20% by weight Soybean meal containing 50.4% protein and subjected to high moisture extrusion cooking at a temperature 150 C, pressure 20 bar, RPM 400 for 2 minutes.


Chicken-like skewers were prepared according to instructions: 0.5 kg of SBY-based meat cut into 25 mm square pieces. Marinated 2-6 hrs in a refrigerator (marinade: 2 tablespoons Miso paste, ¼ cup Lime juice, 1 teaspoon vegan fish sauce, 1 teaspoon shoyu, 2 teaspoons honey, 1 Jalapeno thin-sliced, 1 tablespoon toasted sesame oil). Vegetables for skewers: Crimini or shiitake mushrooms, sweet onion, Sweet pepper. Grilled on each side for 30 seconds.


The resulting product had a clean chicken-like taste with miso lime flavor and a muscle-like fibrous texture as shown in FIG. 1. The resulting product had 22.2% by weight dry equivalent of spent brewers yeast, 59.5% moisture content, 21.3% protein, and 0.072% RNA. The protein content was measured according to AACC 46-30 and AOAC 992.15. RNA extraction was performed, RNA quantification was measured via spectrophotometer and the residual RNA percentage was calculated based on the RNA concentration.


Example 2—Hop-Char Burger, 27.5% by Weight Dry Equivalent of Spent Brewers Yeast

70% by weight liquid concentrated spent brewers' yeast, containing 25% solids, containing 49.6% protein, and 10% by weight dried spent brewers yeast, containing 51.2% protein were mixed with 20% by weight Soybean meal containing 50.4% protein and subjected to high moisture extrusion cooking at a temperature 150 C, pressure 20 bar, RPM 400 for 2 minutes.


Hop-char burger was prepared according to instructions: 1 lb SBY-based meat, 6 oz cooked shiitake mushrooms, 1 tablespoon smoked paprika, 1 tablespoon honey, 1 tablespoon dark soy sauce, Irish moss equivalent of 2 small eggs, Salt & Pepper about 0.05% total weight. Meat processed in a food processor till broken down but not fully blended; mushrooms, spices, honey, soy sauce, herbs added and blended till ground beef consistency and transferred to a bowl to mix with the egg substitute till moisture content looks to match fresh ground beef. Patties formed 35 mm thick and cooked on the charbroiler.


The resulting product had a succulent mouthfeel, umami flavor, and texture of ground beef as shown in FIG. 2. The resulting product had 27.5% by weight dry equivalent of spent brewers yeast, 57.6% Moisture content, 23.9% protein, and 0.089% RNA. The protein content was measured according to AACC 46-30 and AOAC 992.15. RNA extraction was performed, RNA quantification was measured via spectrophotometer and the residual RNA percentage was calculated based on the RNA concentration.


Example 3—Beef Stew, 30% by Weight Dry Equivalent of Spent Brewers' Yeast

30% by weight dried spent brewers yeast, containing 51.2% protein were mixed with 10% by weight Soy protein isolate, containing 90% protein and subjected to high moisture extrusion cooking at a temperature 150 C, pressure 20 bar, RPM 400 for 2 minutes.


Beef stew was prepared according to instructions: 1 lb SBY-based meat cut into approximate 25 mm triangles, 8 oz yellow onion, large dice, 8 oz carrot, 1″ dice or oblique cut, 6 oz russet potatoes, peeled, large dice, ½ cup tamari (or soy sauce), 3½ cups room temperature water, 3 tablespoons raw sugar, 2 tablespoons curry powder, 3-3.5 oz prepared curry roux, 3 tablespoons neutral oil (grapeseed, avocado, canola). Marinade: combine tamari, sugar, curry powder, and 1 cup of water and whisk everything together until the sugar is dissolved. Sear SBY-based meat in a medium saucepan with 2 tablespoons of the oil for approximately 2 minutes per side. Once it's browned, plunge meat into the marinade and let it stand 10 minutes at room temperature. Using the same pan, add the remaining oil and sauté the carrots and onion over medium heat for about 3 minutes; stirring frequently. Add the potatoes, give it all a stir, and then crumble in your curry roux and then stir until it appears to be evenly distributed—about 30 seconds. Add the remaining water (2½ cups), stir, and bring the whole mixture to a boil. Once boiling, reduce heat to low, cover and simmer for about 15 minutes stirring frequently because it will want to stick. The potatoes and carrots should be slightly tender when poked with a knife at this point indicating that it's done. Serve with steamed rice.


The resulting product had a strong beefy umami flavor and a muscle-like fibrous texture as shown in FIG. 3. The resulting product had 30% by weight dry equivalent of spent brewers' yeast, 60% Moisture content, 24.4% protein, and 0.099% RNA. The protein content was measured according to AACC 46-30 and AOAC 992.15. RNA extraction was performed, RNA quantification was measured via spectrophotometer and the residual RNA percentage was calculated based on the RNA concentration.


Example 4—Pulled Pork, 40% by Weight Dry Equivalent of Spent Brewers Yeast

40% by weight dried spent brewers yeast, containing 51.2% protein were mixed with 10% by weight Soy protein isolate, containing 90% protein and subjected to high moisture extrusion cooking at a temperature 150 C, pressure 20 bar, RPM 400 for 2 minutes.


Pulled pork lemongrass veggie bowl was prepared according to instructions: Ingredients to make 1 large bowl: 4 oz. SBY-based meat, shredded, 1 cup Rice noodles, cooked, ⅓ cup Purple Cabbage, sliced, 1/Mango, sliced, 5 each Snap Peas, 4 leaves head Little Gems Lettuce, 5 thin slices Watermelon Radish, Sprinkle of Black Sesame & Lime wedges. Marinade & dressing to make 2 cups: ½ cup Lime Juice & Lime zest, 2 Tablespoons Soy Sauce, ⅓ cup Fish Sauce, ¼ cup Maple Syrup, ¼ Oil, 4-8 gloves Garlic, 2-3 stalks Lemon Grass, tender white parts only, chopped, 1 shallot, peeled & halved. To make marinade & dressing: Combine all ingredients in a blender or food processor. Season with Salt & pepper. Divide marinade in half. With ¼ cup of marinade marinate shredded Planetarian meat in a small bowl for 5 minutes. To assemble bowl: Heat a cast iron pan until very hot. Sear shredded SBY-Based meat until caramelized and crispy. Adding more marinade if needed. In a large serving bowl arrange all the remaining fresh bowl ingredients. Place your seared SBY-Based meat on top. Drizzle with a few tablespoons of the remaining marinade. Indulge and enjoy.


The resulting product had a pronounced meaty flavor and muscle-like fibers as shown in FIG. 4. The resulting product had 40% by weight dry equivalent of spent brewers yeast, 50% moisture content, 29.5% protein, and 1.32% RNA. The protein content was measured according to AACC 46-30 and AOAC 992.15. RNA extraction was performed, RNA quantification was measured via spectrophotometer and the residual RNA percentage was calculated based on the RNA concentration.


One skilled in the art will recognize that the herein described methods, processes, systems, apparatus, components, devices, operations/actions, and objects, and the discussion accompanying them, are used as examples for the sake of conceptual clarity and that various configuration modifications are contemplated. Consequently, as used herein, the specific examples/embodiments set forth and the accompanying discussions are intended to be representative of their more general classes. In general, use of any specific exemplar is intended to be representative of its class, and the non-inclusion of specific components, devices, operations/actions, and objects should not be taken as limiting. While the present disclosure provides descriptions of various specific aspects for the purpose of illustrating various aspects of the present disclosure and/or its potential applications, it is understood that variations and modifications will occur to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the invention or inventions described herein should be understood to be at least as broad as they are claimed, and not as more narrowly defined by particular illustrative aspects provided herein.









TABLE 2







SBY-based alternative meat applications according to examples














Example
Example






1.
2.
Example
Example




Chicken
Hop-char
3. Beef
4. Pulled




skewer
burger
stew
pork





1st SBY
Liquid or
  65%
  70%




source
concentrated SBY







Solids
  11%
  25%





Protein
49.6%
49.6%





SBY-based protein
  4%
  9%




2nd SBY
Dry SBY
  15%
  10%
  30%
  40%


source








Solids
 100%
 100%
 100%
 100%



Protein content
51.2%
51.2%
51.2%
51.2%



SBY-based protein
  8%
  5%
 15%
 20%


Dry SBY

22.2%
27.5%
30.0%
40.0%


equivalent







2nd protein
Soy isolate
20.0%
20.0%
10.0%
  10%


source








Protein content
50.4%
50.4%
90.0%
  90%



Total protein
21.3%
23.9%
24.4%
29.5%



Moisture
59.5%
57.6%
60.0%
  50%



RNA
0.072% 
0.089% 
0.099% 
0.132% 









REFERENCES



  • 1. Gibson, D.; Dwivedi, B. Production of Meat Substitutes from Spent Brewers' Yeast and Soy Protein. Can. Inst. Food Technol. J. 1970, 3, 113-115.

  • 2. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, Ninth edition, 2020 https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov

  • 3. USDA Food Availability (Per Capita) Data System, 2021 https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-availability-per-capita-data-system/

  • 4. J. C. Edozien et al. Effects of high levels of yeast feeding on uric acid metabolism of young men. Nature vol 228, 1970

  • 5. Marson, G. V.; Saturno, R. P.; Comunian, T. A.; Consoli, L.; Machado, M. T. D. C.; Hubinger, M. D. Maillard conjugates from spent brewer's yeast by-product as an innovative encapsulating material. Food Res. Int. 2020, 136, 109365.

  • 6. Canepa, A.; Pieber, M.; Romero, C.; Tohá, J. C. A method for large reduction of the nucleic acid content of yeast. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1972, 14, 173-177.

  • 7. Trevelyan, W. E. Chemical methods for the reduction of the purine content of baker's yeast, a form of single-cell protein. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1976, 27, 225-230.


Claims
  • 1. A meat substitute suitable for human consumption comprising: at least 20% of a yeast by weight based on the dry weight of the meat substitute; anda ribonucleic acid (RNA) content less than 4% of the meat substitute's protein dry weight, andwherein the meat substitute is made by extruding a mix comprising a range of 40% to 80% of a liquid yeast by weight, inclusively, based upon the total weight of the mix.
  • 2. The meat substitute of claim 1 wherein the liquid yeast comprises spent brewers' yeast, spent distillers' yeast, surplus yeast from ethanol manufacturing, bakers' yeast, nutritional yeast, or a combination thereof.
  • 3. The meat substitute of claim 1 further comprising a secondary protein ingredient, wherein the secondary protein ingredient comprises vegetable protein, microbial protein, fungal protein, animal protein, or cultured protein, and wherein the secondary protein ingredient is in a native, concentrated, or isolated form, or a combination thereof.
  • 4. The meat substitute of claim 1 wherein the liquid yeast comprises 8 to 25% solids, inclusively, based on the total weight of the liquid yeast.
  • 5. The meat substitute of claim 1 wherein the liquid yeast comprises 8 to 11% solids, inclusively, based on the total weight of the liquid yeast.
  • 6. The meat substitute of claim 1 wherein the liquid yeast comprises 15 to 25% solids, inclusively, based on the total weight of the liquid yeast.
  • 7. The meat substitute of claim 1 wherein mix comprises from 65 to 70% liquid yeast by weight, inclusively, based upon the total weight of the mix.
  • 8. The meat substitute of claim 1 wherein the liquid yeast comprises one or more of debittered, autolyzed, or hydrolyzed yeast.
  • 9. The meat substitute of claim 1 wherein the extrusion comprises a heat treatment and a pressure treatment.
  • 10. A meat substitute suitable for human consumption comprising: at least 20% of a yeast by weight based on the dry weight of the meat substitute; anda ribonucleic acid (RNA) content less than 4% of the meat substitute's protein dry weight, and wherein the meat substitute is made from a mix comprising a range of 40% to 80% of liquid yeast comprising spent brewers' yeast.
  • 11. The meat substitute of claim 10 further comprising a secondary protein ingredient wherein the secondary protein ingredient comprises vegetable protein, microbial protein, fungal protein, animal protein, or cultured protein, and wherein the secondary protein ingredient is in a native, concentrated, or isolated form, or a combination thereof.
  • 12. The meat substitute of claim 10 wherein the RNA content is less than 0.14% of the meat substitute's dry weight.
  • 13. The meat substitute of claim 10 wherein the RNA content is greater than 0.07% and less than 0.14%, inclusively, of the meat substitute's dry weight.
  • 14. The meat substitute of claim 10 wherein the extrusion comprises a heat treatment and a pressure treatment.
  • 15. A meat substitute suitable for human consumption comprising: 10 to 20% yeast protein by weight, inclusively, based on the total dry weight of the meat substitute;at least 30% by weight of at least one secondary protein ingredient based on the total weight of the meat substitute; anda ribonucleic acid (RNA) content less than 4% of the meat substitute's protein dry weight.
  • 16. The meat substitute of claim 15 wherein the source of the yeast protein comprises spent brewers' yeast, spent distillers' yeast, surplus yeast from ethanol manufacturing, bakers' yeast, nutritional yeast, or a combination thereof.
  • 17. The meat substitute of claim 15 wherein the secondary protein ingredient comprises vegetable protein, microbial protein, fungal protein, animal protein, or cultured protein.
  • 18. The meat substitute of claim 15 wherein the RNA content is less than 0.14% of the meat substitute's dry weight.
  • 19. The meat substitute of claim 15 wherein the RNA content is greater than 0.07% and less than 0.14%, inclusively, of the meat substitute's dry weight.
  • 20. The meat substitute of claim 16 wherein the meat substitute is made by co-extruding the source of the yeast protein and the second protein ingredient, wherein the co-extruding comprises a heat treatment and a pressure treatment.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/475,664, filed on Sep. 15, 2021, which application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 63/221,755 filed on Jul. 14, 2021, the contents of which are incorporated by reference into this specification. This application also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/221,755, filed on Jul. 14, 2021, the contents of which are also incorporated by reference into this specification.

US Referenced Citations (191)
Number Name Date Kind
2162729 Levinson et al. Jun 1939 A
2235613 Grelck Mar 1941 A
2881076 Sair Apr 1959 A
3142571 McAnelly et al. Jul 1964 A
3527642 Harrison et al. Sep 1970 A
3586662 O'Connor Jun 1971 A
3723131 Bixby et al. Mar 1973 A
3754926 Strommer Aug 1973 A
3761353 Noe et al. Sep 1973 A
3787583 Hruby Jan 1974 A
3861293 Buffa et al. Jan 1975 A
3891774 Baker et al. Jun 1975 A
3904769 Sair et al. Sep 1975 A
3908025 Miller Sep 1975 A
3911147 Barham et al. Oct 1975 A
3950564 Puski et al. Apr 1976 A
3966971 Morehouse et al. Jun 1976 A
3971306 Wiese et al. Jul 1976 A
4024286 Cornelius et al. May 1977 A
4052516 Mitchell Oct 1977 A
4088795 Goodnight, Jr. et al. May 1978 A
4185123 Wenger et al. Jan 1980 A
4212799 Nuzzoto et al. Jul 1980 A
4310558 Nahm, Jr. Jan 1982 A
4315034 Levinson et al. Feb 1982 A
4423082 Bauernfeind et al. Dec 1983 A
4435319 Pearce Mar 1984 A
4454804 McCulloch Jun 1984 A
4505936 Meyers et al. Mar 1985 A
4515818 MacDonald et al. May 1985 A
4551335 Canella et al. Nov 1985 A
4794011 Schumacher Dec 1988 A
4901635 Williams Feb 1990 A
4937085 Cherry et al. Jun 1990 A
4973490 Holmes Nov 1990 A
5097017 Konwinski Mar 1992 A
5270062 Buchs Dec 1993 A
5296253 Lusas et al. Mar 1994 A
5328562 Rafferty et al. Jul 1994 A
5346714 Peters Sep 1994 A
5391384 Mazza Feb 1995 A
5436023 Avera Jul 1995 A
5685218 Kemper Nov 1997 A
5702746 Wiik Dec 1997 A
5725902 Lesueur-Brymer et al. Mar 1998 A
5888307 Solheim Mar 1999 A
5912034 Martin et al. Jun 1999 A
5976387 Higo et al. Nov 1999 A
5976594 LaFollette Nov 1999 A
6039999 Bakshi et al. Mar 2000 A
6045851 Cross Apr 2000 A
6132791 Fox Oct 2000 A
6165349 Madar Dec 2000 A
6197081 Schmidt Mar 2001 B1
6534105 Kartchner Mar 2003 B2
6635301 Howsam Oct 2003 B1
6800308 Maenz et al. Oct 2004 B2
6905600 Lee, Jr. Jun 2005 B2
6955831 Higgs et al. Oct 2005 B2
7575771 Ciantar et al. Aug 2009 B2
7771699 Adams et al. Aug 2010 B2
7932065 Medoff Apr 2011 B2
7968760 Lee, Jr. Jun 2011 B2
7989011 Newkirk et al. Aug 2011 B2
7989592 Ganjyai et al. Aug 2011 B2
8017171 Sample Sep 2011 B2
8017820 Foody et al. Sep 2011 B2
8048652 Fichtali et al. Nov 2011 B2
8057639 Pschorn et al. Nov 2011 B2
8133393 Stuart Mar 2012 B2
8192769 Wester et al. Jun 2012 B2
8278081 Schmidt Oct 2012 B2
8293297 Orcutt et al. Oct 2012 B2
8365433 Orura Feb 2013 B2
8372464 Dierking Feb 2013 B2
8415122 Medoff et al. Apr 2013 B2
8481677 Barrows et al. Jul 2013 B2
8506716 Ahring et al. Aug 2013 B2
8529976 McMindes et al. Sep 2013 B2
8603558 Almutairi Dec 2013 B1
8642109 Baumer et al. Feb 2014 B2
8685485 McMindes et al. Apr 2014 B2
8728542 Pickardt et al. May 2014 B2
8735544 Prevost et al. May 2014 B1
8820328 Ehling et al. Sep 2014 B2
8945352 Medoff Feb 2015 B2
8951778 Medoff et al. Feb 2015 B2
8986774 Ganjval Mar 2015 B2
9084948 Mazza et al. Jul 2015 B2
9109180 Wolf et al. Aug 2015 B2
9125962 Michalek et al. Sep 2015 B2
9179692 Trass et al. Nov 2015 B2
9206453 Medoff et al. Dec 2015 B2
9259017 Dhalleine et al. Feb 2016 B2
9370200 Gibbons et al. Jun 2016 B2
9856601 Stromberg Jan 2018 B2
9878355 Norris et al. Jan 2018 B2
9907322 McMindes et al. Mar 2018 B2
10039306 Vrljic et al. Aug 2018 B2
10051878 Helling et al. Aug 2018 B2
10172380 Varadan et al. Jan 2019 B2
10214751 Nilsen et al. Feb 2019 B2
10264805 Spinelli et al. Apr 2019 B2
10299500 Passe et al. May 2019 B2
10344342 Kusuda et al. Jul 2019 B2
10550352 Hewitt et al. Feb 2020 B2
10645950 Manchuliantsau et al. May 2020 B2
20020155206 Orlando Oct 2002 A1
20020174780 Clifford Nov 2002 A1
20030064145 Fannon Apr 2003 A1
20040067289 Tricoit et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040081742 Levi et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040185148 Said Sep 2004 A1
20040202771 Lee Oct 2004 A1
20040224065 Markham et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040237859 Hartmann Dec 2004 A1
20050095346 Borders et al. May 2005 A1
20050136162 Kvist et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050249860 Konecsni et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060040022 Bouraoui Feb 2006 A1
20060093718 Jurkovich et al. May 2006 A1
20060216397 Kerkman Sep 2006 A1
20070014896 Wong et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070087107 Borders et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070092616 Witte et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070172540 Neece et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070269580 Werstak Nov 2007 A1
20080008815 Cho Jan 2008 A1
20080008816 Singh et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080008817 Singh et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080008820 Singh et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080138495 Barraclough et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080160132 Silver et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080233266 Boerboom Sep 2008 A1
20090053800 Friend et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090155444 Yakubu et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090155447 Moore et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090155448 Solorio et al. Jun 2009 A1
20100021609 Mattson et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100112136 Ward et al. May 2010 A1
20100166940 McMindes et al. Jul 2010 A1
20110027433 Ruf et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110081689 Flanegan et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110172142 Smith et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110212239 Carin et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110309559 Franke et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110311599 Boursier et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120093994 Hsieh et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120171351 Solorio Jul 2012 A1
20120294986 Choromanskl et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120301598 Karges et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130052682 Medoff et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130109065 Godfroid et al. May 2013 A1
20130243904 Cordle et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130287909 Lewis et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140088330 Powell et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140096764 Komplin et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140134316 Jincks et al. May 2014 A1
20140141127 Jincks et al. May 2014 A1
20140273140 Langhauser Sep 2014 A1
20140328984 Legault Nov 2014 A1
20150017312 Tegel Jan 2015 A1
20150041574 Anderson Feb 2015 A1
20150056324 Cecava et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150181907 Baumer et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150223498 Gu et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150250212 Diaz et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150367298 Wenger Dec 2015 A1
20160017444 Medoff et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160108187 Wendeln et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160143337 Passe May 2016 A1
20160295897 Lis et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160309743 Spinelli et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160360770 Sherlock et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170105438 Ajami et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170226439 Nguyen et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170226535 Tudman Aug 2017 A1
20170226695 Rowlands et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170280756 Jaramillo Freydell et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170303558 Eisner et al. Oct 2017 A1
20180310590 Manchuliantsau Nov 2018 A1
20180327792 Brown et al. Nov 2018 A1
20190000120 Hossen et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190075820 Redl et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190153122 Mateus et al. May 2019 A1
20190183155 Manchuliantsau Jun 2019 A1
20190223475 Manchuliantsau et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190223476 Manchuliantsau et al. Jul 2019 A1
20200060308 Manchuliantsau et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200138055 Schein May 2020 A1
20200260758 Manchuliantsau et al. Aug 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (23)
Number Date Country
10488 Apr 2008 BY
968214 May 1975 CA
1177323 Nov 1984 CA
2652384 Nov 2014 CA
3014516 Sep 2017 CA
102742661 Oct 2012 CN
0092443 Oct 1983 EP
0455889 Mar 1995 EP
2218497 Aug 2010 EP
3491931 Jun 2019 EP
116357 Jun 1918 GB
19930019123 Oct 1993 KR
100248275 Mar 2000 KR
100767809 Oct 2007 KR
2297155 Apr 2007 RU
2631827 Sep 2017 RU
WO 2009129320 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2009134791 Nov 2009 WO
WO 2010135679 Nov 2010 WO
WO 2011107760 Sep 2011 WO
WO 2017075078 May 2017 WO
WO 2019102248 May 2019 WO
WO 2019106072 Jun 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (61)
Entry
Gibson et al. Can Inst. Food Technol. J. 3: 113-115 (Year: 1970).
Gibson, D.; Dwivedi, B. Production of Meat Substitutes from Spent Brewers' Yeast and Soy Protein, Can. Inst. Food Technol. J. 1970, 3, 113-115.
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, Ninth edition, 2020, available at https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov.
USDA Food Availability (Per Capita) Data System, 2021, available at https://www.ersusda.gov/data-products/food-availability-per-capita-data-system/.
J.C. Edozien et al., Effects of high levels of yeast feeding on uric acid metabolism of young men, Nature vol. 228, Oct. 10, 1970, p. 180.
Marson, G.V.; Saturno, R.P.; Comunian, T.A.; Consoli, L.; Machado, M.T.D.C.; Hubinger, M.D., Maillard conjugates from spent brewer's yeast by-product as an innovative encapsulating material, Food Res. Int. 2020, 136, 109365. ISSN 0963-9969, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109365.
Canepa, A.; Pieber, M.; Romero, C.; Tohá, J.C. A method for large reduction of the nucleic acid content of yeast, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1972, vol. 14, 173-177.
Trevelyan, W.E., Chemical methods for the reduction of the purine content of baker's yeast, a form of single-cell protein, J. Sci. Food Agric. 1976, vol. 27, 225-230.
Jaeger A, Arendt EK, Zannini E, Sahin AW. Brewer's Spent Yeast (BSY), an Underutilized Brewing By-Product. Fermentation. 2020; 6(4):123. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation6040123.
ADM, PRO-FAM® 974, Isolated Soy Protein, 066-974, Jun. 26, 2008, 1 page.
Da Graca Costa do Nascimento et al., “Use of sesame oil cake (Sesamum indicum L.) on corn expanded extrudates”, Food Research International, 2012, vol. 45, pp. 434-443.
Sivaramakrishnan et al., “Chapter 13 Edible Oil Cakes”, Biotechnology for Agro-Industrial Residtses Utilisation, 2009, pp. 253-271.
Suknark et al., “Physical Properties of Directly Expanded Extrudates Formulated from Partially Defatted Peanut Flour and Different Types of Starch”, Food Research International, 1997, vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 575-583.
Sokolowska et al., “Characteristics of rapeseed oilcake using nitrogen adsorption”, International Agrophysics, 2013, 27, pp. 329-334.
Stein, “Nutritional Value of High Fiber Coproducts from the Copra, Palm Kernel, and Rice Industries in Diets Fed to Pigs”, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2015, vol. 6, No. 56, 9 pages.
Suttirak et al., “Potential Application of Ascorbic Acid, Citric Acid and Oxalic Acid for Browning Inhibition in Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables”, Walailak J Sci & Tech, 2010, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 5-14.
McEvily et al., “Inhibition of Enzymatic Browning in Foods and Beverages”, Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 1992, vol. 32, No. 3, 253-273.
Narita et al., “Degradation Kinetics of Chlorogenic Acid at Various pH Values and Effects of Ascorbic Acid and Epigallocatechin Gallate on Its Stability under Alkaline Conditions”, J. Agric. Food Chem., 2013, vol. 61, pp. 966-972.
Salgado et al., “Sunflower Protein Concentrates and Isolates Prepared from Oil Cakes Have High Water Solubility and Antioxidant Capacity”, J Am Oil Chem Soc, 2011, 88, pp. 351-360.
Wong, Jacqueline, “Food Waste Diversion Options Analysis in Pomona, CA”, A Thesis presented to the faculty of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, 2018, 99 pages.
Bhatt et al., “From food waste to value-added surplus products (VASP): Consumer acceptance of a novel food product category”, J Consumer Behav., 2017, pp. 1-7.
Pakhomova O.N., “Development and use of a functional food fortifier from rapeseed cake”, Thesis for application for academic degree of Ph.D., Orel, 2014. (English abstract included at p. 1—corresponds to Pakhomova O.N., “Development and use of functional rapeseed meal enrichment agent” as cited in the Dec. 5, 2019 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the ISA for international Application No. PCT/US2019/044258).
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2018/030084 dated Aug. 9, 2018.
Shepon et al., “Energy and protein feed-to-food conversion efficiencies in the US and potential food security gains from dietary changes”, Environ. Res. Lett. 11, Oct. 2016, 8 pages.
Rodrigues et al., “Increasing the Protein Content of Rapeseed Meal by Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Carbohydrates”, BioResources, 9(2), 2014, pp. 2010-2025.
Brugger et al., “Next Generation Texturized Vegetable Proteins”, Food Marketing & Technology, Apr. 2017, pp. 20-24.
Brookfield CT3, Tenure Analyzer, Operating instructions, Manual No. M08-372-C0113, Brookfield Engineering Laboratories, Inc., 56 pages.
Vestjens, Laura, MSc Thesis Biobased Chemistry and Technology, Sunflower-based protein fractions for food applications, Wageningen University & Research, Jul. 7, 2017.
Berk, Zeki, Chapter 6: Isolated Soybean Protein, Technology of Production of Edible Flours and Protein Products from Soybeans, FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin No. 97, http://www.fao.org/3/t0532e/t0532e07.htm, accessed Oct. 31, 2019.
Deshpande et al., “Optimization of a chocolate-favored, peanut-soy beverage using response surface methodology (RSM) as applied to consumer acceptability data”, Swiss Society of Food Science and Technology, 41, 2008, pp. 1485-1492.
Ren et al., “Isolation and Characterization of Sunflower Protein Isolates and Sunflower Globulins”, Information Tech. and Agricultural Eng., AISC 134, 2012, pp. 441-449.
Perednya et al., “The Fodder Production's Extrusion Technologies”, Vestnik NIIMZh Journal No. 4 (20), 2015, pp. 60-63. (English abstract included at p. 63—corresponds to Perednya V.I. et al. “Extrusion technology in feed production” as cited in the Dec. 5, 2019 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the ISA for International Application No. PCT/US2019/044258).
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2019/044258 dated Dec. 5, 2019.
Markov, S.A. et al., “Features of Fractions Chemical Compound of Sunflower Oilcakes and Meal at them Reagentless Division”,Izvestiia VUZov. Pishchevaia Tekhnologiia, No. 1, 2012, pp. 29-31. (English abstract included at p. 31—corresponds to Markov S.A. et al., “Features of the chemical composition of fractions of sunflower meal and meal during their reagent-free separation” as cited in the Dec. 5, 2019 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the ISA for International Application No. PCT/US2019/044258).
Andrianova E.N., “Chlorogenic Acid and Productivity of Broilers,” All-Russian Research and Technological Poultry Institute (VNITIP), No. 9, 2015, pp. 17-21. (English abstract included at p. 17—corresponds to Andrianova cited in the Dec. 5, 2019 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the ISA for International Application No. PCT/US2019/044258).
Meal/WholeSeed Feeding, National Sunflower Association, accessed Feb. 20, 2020 from https://www.sunflowernsa.com/wholeseed/, 1 page.
Sunflower as a Feed, National Sunflower Association, accessed Feb. 20, 2020 from https://www.sunflowernsa.com/wholeseed/sunflower-as-a-feed/, 6 pages.
Sunflower Protein, AURI, Agricultural Utilization Research Institute, 2018, 2 pages.
Wildermuth, et al., “Chlorogenic Acid Oxidation and Its Reaction with Sunflower Proteins to Form Green-Colored Complexes”, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2016, vol. 15, pp. 829-843.
ABC about PLANETARIANS, video aired Mar. 19, 2018, KSTP-TV, Minneapolis, MN, accessed from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5df9_0Wvnjl&feature=youtu.be.
“Planetarians Aiming to Fight Childhood Obesity with Food Waste”, Sustainable Brands, Nov. 16. 2017, accessed from https://sustainablebrands.com/read/waste-not/planetarians-aiming-to-fight-childhood-obesity-with-food-waste, 5 pages.
Stone, Dawna, “Do Planetarians Sunflower Chips Have More Protein Than Beef?!”, Bold Business, Feb. 27, 2018, accessed from https://www.boidbusiness.com/nutrition/planetarians-sunflower-chips-more-protein-beef/, 6 pages.
Feeding the Future, Successful Farming, Sep. 17, 2019, accessed from https://www.agriculture.com/news/business/feeding-the-future, 9 pages.
Today's Dietician, Great Valley Publishing Company, Inc., May 2018, vol. 20, No. 5, 69 pages.
Planetarians: “Animal Agriculture Cannof Feed the World”, Oct. 26, 2018, vegconomist, accessed from https://vegconomist.com/interviews/planetarians-animal-agriculture-cannot-feed-the-world/, 8 pages.
Burwood-Taylor, Louisa, 2019 AgFunder AgriFood Tech Innovation Awards Winners Announced, AgFunder Network Partners, Mar. 21, 2019, accessed from https://agfundernews.com/2019-agfunder-innovation-awards-winners-announced.html, 4 pages.
PLANETARIANS Sunflower Chips, National Sunflower Association, Dec. 1, 2018, accessed from https://www.sunflowernsa.com/magazine/articles/default.aspx?, 4 pages.
Askew, Katy, “Planetarians ties-up with Barilla, Amadori to innovate with up-cycled sunflower flour”, Mar. 19, 2019, FoodNavigator.com, accessed from https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2019/03/19/Planetarians-ties-up-with-Barilla-Amadori-to-innovate-with-up-cycled-sunflower-flour?utm_source=copyright&utm_medium=OnSite&utm_campaign=copyright, 5 pages.
Murray, Sarah, “Accelerators speed development of promising food start-ups”, Financial Times, Mar. 11, 2019, accessed from https://www.ft.com/content/778c9f5e-294e-11e9-9222-7024072222bc, 4 pages.
Peters, Adele, “Everything you need to know about the booming business of fighting food waste”, Jun. 19, 2019, accessed from https://www.fastcompany.com/90337075/inside-the-booming-business-of-fighting-food-waste, 7 pages.
Leinonen et al., “Lysine Supply Is a Critical Factor in Achieving Sustainable Globai Protein Economy”, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, Apr. 2019, vol. 3, Article 27, 11 pages.
Ajandouz, et al., “Nonenzymatic Browning Reaction of Essential Amino Acids: Effect of pH on Caramelization and Maillard Reaction Kinetics”, J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 5, 1786-1793. English abstract only.
Lin et al., Extrusion Process Parameters, Sensory Characteristics, and Structural Properties of a High Moisture Soy Protein Meat Analog, Journal of Food Science, vol. 60, No. 3, 2002, pp. 1066-1072.
Solae™ Product Standard, Supra® 320, Isolated Soy Protein, Version: 1.0 Issue Date Apr. 2, 2010, 4 pages.
Uriman Grain Product Specification Sheet for Non-GMO U.S. Soybean Meal, Select 5CF, Dec. 7, 2010, 1 page.
International Feed, Sunflower Seed Meal Product Sheet, Feb. 17, 2015, 1 page.
Sotillo et al., Corn Meal-Sunflower Meal Extrudates and Their Physicochemical Properties, Journal of Food Science, vol. 59, No. 2, 1994, pp. 432-435.
Yue et al., Native and Succinylated Sunflower Proteins Use in Bread Baking, Journal of Food Science, vol. 56, No. 4, 1991, pp. 992-995.
Reddy et al., Supplementation of Wheat Muffins with Dried Distillers Grain Flour, Journal of Food Quality, 9, 1986, pp. 243-249.
Arepa with Soy, Mintel, Record ID 6281913, Jan. 25, 2019, http://www.gnpd.com, 2 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2020/052385 dated Dec. 7, 2020.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63221755 Jul 2021 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 17475664 Sep 2021 US
Child 17571995 US