This invention relates generally to petroleum and natural gas wells, and particularly to wellhead site equipment. More particularly, it relates to a spherical sand separator installed at the wellhead upstream of other surface equipment for separating solid debris from well effluent fluids.
Exploration for underground, fluid hydrocarbons such as methane, or natural gas, often involves injection of high-pressure fluids (mostly water with sand) into underground rock formations expected to yield the hydrocarbons, a process commonly referred to as hydraulic fracturing. Water pressure fractures the rock strata, whereupon entrapped hydrocarbons escape into the well bore to be captured at the surface and piped to market. Hydraulic fracturing fluid is recovered from the exploration wells and disposed of, usually by hauling it off in trucks to a remote disposal site.
Fracturing fluid contains a considerable amount of fracturing sand which scours the formation to clean and etch it for maximum delivery. Sand also lodges in cracks created by fracturing fluid pressure and holds them open to maximize escape of hydrocarbons from the strata. Sand from fracturing fluid doesn't all lodge in the formation, however, some returning to the surface in “flowback” from the well. During flowback, the well disgorges fracturing fluid under pressure from the escaping hydrocarbons. The flowback fracturing fluid includes a significant quantity of the injected sand, as well as granular rock debris flushed from the rock strata by the fracturing and flowback stages. Such sand and debris can wreak havoc upon pressure and velocity reducing choke valves and upon relatively sensitive surface testing, metering and processing equipment. A need exists for means for eliminating sand and rock debris from returned hydraulic fracturing fluid.
Production wells likewise need protection from fracturing sand and granular rock debris. Hydrocarbons from producing wells comprise not only oil and gaseous methane, but myriad other liquid byproducts, some of which are valuable (e.g. petroleum and natural gas distillates) and others of which are waste (e.g. stratigraphic saline and residual fracturing fluid), both of which may include significant quantities of sand. Surface equipment adapted for segregating well byproducts and for metering output from producing wells is vulnerable to damage from such debris. A need exists for means for separating solid materials such a sand and rock granules from producing well effluents.
Most prior art sand separators comprise vertical, cylindrical towers that stand eight (8 ft.) feet or more in height, have thick walls and are supported by a derrick or other stand. Such devices are exceptionally heavy, as they must withstand wellhead pressure while handling wellhead throughput volume. Such vessels also must be transported on roads and highways as oversized loads, requiring governmental special permits to do so. A need exists for a sand separator that can handle required wellhead pressures and volume throughput while remaining within overall size and weight parameters.
A sand separator for capturing solid debris from oil and gas wells includes a spherical, high-pressure vessel adapted to couple downstream of a wellhead. Fluid entering the separator follows a helical path around a vertical separator axis, slowing and separating into water, gas, oil and solid debris, the latter sinking to the bottom. A conical, downwardly opening flue descends from an exit port at the top and terminates in a horizontal, coaxial perimeter. A scalloped, annular collar inside the flue perimeter creates a low-threshold barrier to fluid flow into the flue. As fluid constituents circulate toward the flue, they recombine free of sand and rock debris, pass under the flue perimeter and across the collar, slowing further and becoming substantially laminar. A fluid dome rises inside the flue with a gas layer above other fluid constituents, permitting the gas to exit the separator through the exit port.
The novel features believed characteristic of the present invention are set forth in appended claims. The invention, as well as a preferred mode of use and further objects and advantages thereof, further will be understood by reference to the following detailed description of one or more illustrative embodiments when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring to the figures, the present invention comprises a sand separator having a tank 10 with vertical axis A surrounded by upper, hemispherical dome 11 atop lower, hemispherical basin 12. Tank 10 is supported at a select height above a resting surface (not shown) by stand 17 sufficiently high to allow access to debris exit port 15, discussed in more detail below. Top dome 11 also may include one or more lifting lugs 13 for maneuvering separator 10 between a transportation vehicle (not shown) and said resting surface at an installation site. Separator tank 10 is adapted to be installed adjacent said wellhead with axis A oriented substantially vertically. Vertical orientation takes advantage of gravity to encourage debris 5 to fall to the bottom of lower basin 12 for removal through a sand outlet, including debris exit port 15 and sand shield 16. Accumulated sand 5 (
Sand shield 16 straddles debris exit port 15 to support the weight of sand 5 and to prevent it from clogging sand exit port 15. Sand shield 16 preferably comprises a horizontal plate spanning outlet 15 and supported above it by at least three vertical legs. Sand 5 and other debris passes under said plate and between said legs to enter sand exit port 15. One having ordinary skill in the art will recognize that sand shield 16 may have other configurations, such as a sloped or domed plate and a different number of support legs, and that said support legs may be oriented other than vertically, without departing from the scope of the present invention.
The remaining fluid F, comprising mostly natural gas 1, oil and water 3, eventually exits sand separator tank 10 at fluid outlet 31 where it proceeds through velocity-reducing choke valves (not shown) and onward to be separated into its constituents and processed as production fluids. If the wellhead is a gas well, gas 1 is routed to accumulation tanks and/or pipelines (neither shown), while oil and liquid precipitates are routed to other storage means (not shown) for further refining. If it is an oil well, gas 1 may be flared. Water in both cases usually is a byproduct for disposal, as it cannot be re-used without significant processing because it is contaminated with fracturing fluid chemicals. One having ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the present invention is useful for sand and solid debris removal in all such situations.
As best seen in
Disposed on the interior end of nozzle 22 distal inlet 21, diverter 23 redirects fluid F toward the interior wall of upper dome 11, preferably, but not necessarily, still within said entry plane. Diverter 23 deflects fluid F at an angle, preferably an obtuse angle, to the centerline of nozzle 22. This causes fluid F to encounter the concave wall of upper dome 11 at impact location I (
One having ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the location of impact point I and the angle at which fluid F encounters the walls of dome 11 may vary. In a particular embodiment, impact location I is between forty-five (45 deg.) degrees and one hundred thirty-five (135 deg.) degrees. In another particular embodiment, impact location I is substantially ninety (90 deg.) degrees offset from inlet port 21, whereby fluid F impacts the walls of dome 11 at substantially forty-five (45 deg.) degrees of angle. Diverter 23 accordingly is at substantially forty-five (45 deg.) degree angle to nozzle 22. Thus, fluid F impacts the walls of dome 11 at a significant angle, and is deflected by said walls to circulate around dome 11. Because dome 11 walls are generally concave downward, fluid F also is diverted and downward toward and into basin 12 in a substantially helical path.
Disposed across and on either side of said impact location I, concave erosion plate 25 intercepts fluid F as it encounters the curved walls of dome 11. Erosion plate 25 retards erosion caused by fluid F still under substantially full wellhead speed and pressure and bearing significant amounts of solid debris particles. Preferably, erosion plate 25 is sufficiently large and shaped to fully cover impacting fluid F and to protect dome 11 walls from erosion. In a particular embodiment, erosion plate 25 comprises a three-quarter (¾ in.) inch thick lamination of concave steel plate lining said upper dome wall, centered on location I and extending in both horizontal directions from location I approximately fifteen (15 deg.) degrees of angular displacement, as well as extending in both vertical directions for a displacement of approximately five (5 deg.) degrees.
As best seen in
Continuing with
Coupled to downcomer 33 by clamp 44 a spaced distance above mouth 34, flue 40 comprises conical, downwardly opening chimney 43 that directs fluid F toward mouth 34. It has a horizontal, substantially circular perimeter forming a cone base approximately three-fourths of the diameter of separator 10 and a vertical height of approximately one-fourth of said diameter of separator 10. Chimney 43 couples to downcomer 33 about three and one-half (3½ in.) inches above mouth 34, and flares downward coaxial with vertical axis A to end in a margin or perimeter 44 disposed below the entry plane of nozzle 22. Thus, fluid F must flow downward, below perimeter 44, as described above, before it can enter outlet 31.
Arrayed around perimeter 44 of chimney 43, a plurality of radially outward facing notches 45 serve two purposes. First, notches 45 locate and assist press breaking of the plate steel of chimney 43 into radial bends which give it its conical shape, as discussed below. Second, notches 45 strain and break fluid F into a plurality of small rivulets (
Disposed radially inward from perimeter 44 and coupled to the underside of chimney 43, annular collar 50 is coaxial with and parallel to axis A. Collar 50 attaches by its upper margin to the underside of chimney 43 with a continuous, fluid-tight weldment, and extends vertically downward to terminate approximately coplanar with perimeter 44. Preferably, collar 50 includes a plurality of downwardly opening, substantially semi-circular scalloped openings 52 along its lower margin. Scalloped openings 52 extend approximately half the height of collar 50, and match substantially the height and area of notches 45. Preferably, scalloped openings 52 are evenly spaced around the lower margin of collar 50 and angularly offset around axis A so that they do not line up with notches 45 in perimeter 44.
Collar 50 thus forms a short dam intercepting and diverting the flow of fluid F coming from notches 45. Fluid F passes under perimeter 44 through notches 45, and then encounters collar 50 which further slows it. The individual rivulets (not shown) of fluid F thus divert their pathway and flow through scalloped openings 52, slowing the speed of fluid F even further. In such manner, fluid F enters the interior of flue 40 far more calmly than it enters interior 14 of separator tank 10 at inlet 21. Fluid F remains under high pressure from the wellhead, but its speed has been reduced and its laminar flow increased as it approaches outlet 31.
Though fluid F entering flue 40 may contain other constituents, it primarily comprises gas 1, oil and water 3. This admix of gas and water is considerably lighter than fluid F had been when it entered separator 10 at inlet 21, largely because of the removal of solid debris 5. Under slower movement but continued wellhead pressure, some lighter constituents of fluid F, primarily gas 1, can separate out from fluid F and form pockets or layers of such undissolved constituents.
As it continues to circulate, fluid F rises buoyantly toward the top of flue 40, forming a fluid dome 62 comprising primarily fluid F substantially devoid of debris 5. Fluid dome 62 reaches toward, but never quite enters, mouth 34 of downcomer 33. Instead, a high-pressure gas dome 61 of undissolved gas 1 builds atop fluid dome 62 against the underside of chimney 43, the outer wall of downcomer 33 and above and across mouth 34 above fluid dome 62. Gas 1 thereby is channeled into downcomer 33 and exits separator tank 10 through outlet 31b. See
Gas dome 61 has the effect of compressing other constituents of fluid F in fluid dome 62 which have not yet recombined with gas 1, said constituents largely being liquids such as water 3, oil and liquid gas precipitates. At the margin between fluid dome 62 and gas dome 61, gas 1 partially recombines with water 3 and oil from fluid dome 62, creating an admix of the lighter constituents of fluid F. The admix then flows into mouth 34 and through outlet 31, leaving heavier constituents of fluid F, including sand 5, inside separator tank 10.
Preferably, diverter 23 comprises an angled portion of steel pipe similar to nozzle 22. One having ordinary skill in the art will recognize, however, that diverter 23 could be an elbow, angled deflector plate, or other device, and it could be reinforced against erosion, without departing from the scope of the present invention. Preferably, nozzle 22 comprises a high-grade steel pipe of at least Schedule 40 and having an inner diameter of substantially four (4 in.) inches. Chimney 43 preferably comprises a circular steel plate sufficiently thick to remain rigid though buffeted by the high speed and pressure of fluid F. Chimney 43 is formed into a truncated cone by press-breaking it at spaced intervals around its perimeter. In a particular embodiment, chimney 43 is one-half (½ in.) inch thick, has a base diameter of three (3 ft.) feet and a height of one (1 ft.) foot. Separator 10's dome 11 and basin 12 are fabricated from high strength steel of sufficient thickness to withstand fluid pressures from a natural gas wellhead (not shown) downstream of which separator 10 is coupled and with which it is in fluid communication. Dome 11 and basin 12 preferably are congruent and mate at their circular, hemispherical margins and sealed closed with weldment 19 also capable of withstanding said wellhead fluid pressures. One having ordinary skill in the art will recognize that separator 10 may vary in size and shell thickness depending upon the wellhead application for which it is designed.
Depending upon the pressures of the gas field in which said wellhead is located, shut-in pressures may range from as little as 1000 psig to as much as 15,000 psig. Further, gas well pressures from time-to-time may surge substantially above such typical field shut-in pressures. For greater wellhead shut-in pressures, larger diameter separators 10 create a trade-off between diameter and wall thickness. Finally, separator 10 also must be capable of the volume output of water and gas of said wellhead effluent fluid.
By way of a First Example, the hydrostatic pressures experienced during 2010 in the Barnett Shale gas field in and around Fort Worth, Tex., typically fell into the range of 1000-1500 psig. Volumes from the Barnett Shale play typically ran as much as 10 million cubic feet (MMCF/da.) of natural gas per day with a water content of 2000 barrels (bbls./da.) per day.
For such relatively low wellhead shut-in pressures at such volumes, a particular embodiment of separator 10 has an outside diameter of approximately fifty-four (54 in.) inches with approximately three (3 in.) inches of wall thickness. This provides an internal diameter of approximately forty-eight (48 in.) inches, resulting in an interior volume of approximately 33.5 cubic feet, a volume sufficient for most applications. This is the equivalent of almost three 16-inch diameter cylindrical sand separator towers standing eight feet tall, thus providing a significant efficiency in overall size and weight.
As a Second Example, a wellhead shut-in pressure of 5000 psig dictates that separator 10 walls must increase in thickness, possibly reducing the internal diameter of separator 10 too much for the expected throughput volumes. This requires that its outside diameter increase to accommodate thicker walls that can withstand the increased pressure while the internal diameter of separator 10 remains sufficiently large for the volume throughput of natural gas and fluid F. Thus, for the same throughput as the First Example above, separator 10 requires wall thicknesses of three and one-half (3½ in.) to four (4 in.) inches, requiring an outside diameter of two to four (2 in. to 4 in.) inches greater than the 54 inches of the First Example. This is a modest increase over the size requirement for the First Example, though its weight will increase noticeably.
In operation, wellhead effluent fluid F enters separator 10 through inlet 21 and nozzle 22, at substantially unchoked wellhead pressures and velocity. Though fluid F immediately experiences a release of pressure because of the increased volume of interior 14 of separator 10 in contrast to wellhead piping (not shown), the pressure within separator 10 remains high. As fluid F circulates inside separator 10 and descends within tank interior 14, however, gas 1 separates from fluid F and rises to enter flue 40. With gas 1 released from the stream of fluid F now substantially containing mostly water 3 and sand 5, the velocity of fluid F slows considerably more. As fluid F drops low enough within tank interior 14 to enter flue 40 below perimeter 44, it slows even further while turning the corner and beginning to rise inside chimney 43. One having ordinary skill in the art will recognize that fluid F at this point is primarily an admix of oil and water 3, gas 1 having already separated out and risen into chimney 43. Fluid F rises until it approaches mouth 34, where it recombines with a layer of gas 1 and exits separator 10 through fluid outlet 31.
Thus, the helical circulation of fluid F within tank 10 substantially increases the overall length of its pathway while it is in tank 10. This in turn substantially increases the drop in speed of fluid F and maximizes the time debris 5 has to settle out of fluid F. Further, such a helical path, and the circular manner in which the present invention induces it, increases the laminar nature of the flow of fluid F, further stabilizing and calming it for debris 5 to settle out. This is in contrast to most prior art which directs fluid F straight toward a deflector plate which abruptly interrupts fluid F and diverts it downward toward the bottom of tank 10, causing considerable non-laminar turbulence and disrupting the settlement action of debris 5.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to one or more particular embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, though separator 10 has been discussed above in the context of natural gas exploration and production, it works as well for petroleum exploration and production. The lighter constituents of fluid F in this context are primarily petroleum, which escape into flue 40 around perimeter 44 and recombines at mouth 34 with fluid F substantially freed of sand 5, as discussed for natural gas 1. Also, tank 10 has been depicted and discussed as being spherical in shape, with its walls substantially circular in cross section, but it could comprise other shapes, such as ovate, tetrahedral or even cubical, as long as its interior 14 did not create so much turbulence that it overcomes the slowing and calming effect of the helical rotation of fluid F for the purpose of letting debris 5 settle out for removal.
This application claims domestic benefit from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 63/136,198, filed Jan. 11, 2021. The contents thereof are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US22/11758 | 1/10/2022 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63136198 | Jan 2021 | US |