Patent Grant
11208625
The present invention relates to a device suitable for culturing spheroids with a uniform size in large numbers and in high density and a method using the device.
Non patent literature 1 indicates that the three-dimensional culture method is available for reproducing the functions of living tissues more accurately than the two-dimensional culture method. Non patent literature 1 also indicates that the three-dimensional culture method is one of methods useful for efficiently differentiating pluripotent stem cells and iPS cells. Attempts are being made to rebuild and complement lost functions by returning three-dimensionally cultured artificial tissues into a body using such a technique. Moreover, other attempts are being made to apply such a technique to regenerative medicine for assistance of damaged tissue repair. Further attempts are being made to use such a technique for testing toxicity of pharmaceutical agents. In particular, large-scale production of cell aggregates that are uniform in size and shape is required for regenerative medicine and its research. In addition, a method with higher convenience and lower cost than existing methods will become necessary.
[Significance of Producing Uniform Sized and Shaped Cell Aggregates]
In the case of liver cells, there is a problem that in vivo functions cannot be reproduced in vitro. One example of this problem is that the drug metabolism function inherent in liver cells is deteriorated when the liver cells are two-dimensionally cultured. One of means for addressing this problem is a method for forming cell aggregates as disclosed in Non-patent literature 2. Non patent literature 2 indicates that the function of the cell aggregates produced by this method is dramatically improved from those of the two-dimensionally cultured cells.
When embryonic stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cells are differentiated into target cells in vitro, cell aggregates called embryoid bodies is formed, followed by the initiation of the program of development and differentiation, to thereby differentiate embryonic stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cells into target cells. Non patent literature 3 reports that size of cell aggregates influence the directions of differentiation.
[Regarding Technique for Producing a Large Number of Uniform Size and Shape Cell Aggregates]
Non patent literature 4 discloses a culture method called the hanging drop method in which culture is performed in droplets. Non patent literature 4 further discloses a U or V bottomed low adherence plate. Non patent literature 4 also discloses a large-scale culture method using bioreactors. The hanging drop method, U bottomed plate and the like are suitable for producing cell aggregates that are uniform in size and shape. On the other hand, the hanging drop method, U bottomed plate and the like are not suitable for large-scale culture because they allow only one cell aggregate to be produced in one well. Although the hanging drop method is widely applied to research, it is not suitable for large-scale culture for producing more than several hundred or several thousand order of cell aggregates at a time.
Non patent literature 4 discloses a method using a low adherence container. Non patent literature 4 also discloses a development of a method using roller bottle. Further disclosed is a development of a method for immobilizing cells in a gel or beads so as to carry out suspension culture. Although these methods enable several thousand cell aggregates to be produced with a high density, there is a problem that the produced cell aggregates are heterogeneous. Roller bottles in low rotation that are capable of large-scale production of comparatively homogeneous cell aggregates are being developed. However, these methods require a large-scale apparatus accompanied with complicated operation. Further, even though the rotation speed of roller bottles or the like is controlled precisely, any adjacent cells and cell aggregates may be irregularly associated with each other to form another cell aggregates in a solution. It is thus difficult to produce uniform size cell aggregates.
For example, patent literature 1 discloses an example of a method for producing a group of cell aggregates in a large number and with convenience. In this group, morphological features such as size and shape of the cell aggregates and properties outside cells are homogeneous. In the method disclosed in patent literature 1, a culture solution containing cells is poured into a hollow part of a structural member, wherein at least one lower end of the hollow part is opened. At this time, a portion of the culture solution is made to project downward from the open end. In this method, the cells are cultured in the projecting portion of the culture solution. This method has a problem for pouring the culture solution into the hollow part when an upper end of the hollow part is closed. Another problem of this method is that a process for forming the projecting portion of the culture solution is complicated. Moreover, a problem in this process is that it is necessary to accurately adjust an amount of pouring. Although the pouring(suction) of the culture solution can be efficiently carried out when both ends of the hollow part are open, there is another problem in this method. The problem is that the upper end needs to be closed or a mechanism for maintaining a suction pressure needs to be further included in order to maintain a state of the culture solution that has been poured into. New limitations are imposed on this manner since an amount of the culture solution that can be involved in metabolism of the cells is regulated by a volume of the hollow part. One of the new limitations is that a cell concentration and a culture period are limited by the metabolic activity of a cell for use. The available size of cell aggregates and types of cells are also limited by this new limitation. Patent Literature 2 discloses a suspension plate that allows easier pouring of a culture solution than that in the technique disclosed in Patent literature 1. Patent literature 2 discloses a structure in which a culture solution is communicated from a first surface with a second surface. However, with the manner disclosed in patent literature 2, the number of pouring operations is increased in proportion to the number of cell aggregates to be created. Accordingly, the problem of complicated operations still remains.
As described above, the conventional culture method using the container for the hanging drop method and the culture method using the rotary bottles have advantage and drawback. It has thus been difficult to produce a large number of cell aggregates that are uniform in shape and size. Large-scale production, which is several hundred or thousand order, of such cell aggregates has been particularly difficult.
The present invention has been made in light of the above problems.
The present inventors have investigated a physical phenomenon occurring between a device for culturing cells and a culture medium. As a result of the investigation, the present inventors have achieved a device for producing spheroids with a convenient method.
In an exemplary aspect of the present invention, a spheroid-producing device includes at least a first surface, a second surface, and a plurality of wall surfaces. The second surface is a back side surface of the first surface. The respective wall surfaces constitute a plurality of holes penetrating through the first surface and the second surface. In addition, an equivalent diameter of inscribed circles of openings in the first surface is greater than an equivalent diameter of inscribed circles of openings in the second surface. According to the above exemplary aspect, it is possible to provide a device suitable for easily producing a large number of spheroids. This device enables a culture medium to be poured from the first surface that is disposed on an upper side and produced spheroids to be recovered from the second surface that is disposed on a lower side. This facilitates seeding process of cells and culturing process of the cells. It is thus possible to reduce times required for these processes. Additionally, there are following advantages in forming holes in the spheroid-producing device in which the diameter of the holes is increased from the second surface toward the first surface. Firstly, a culture solution can be easily infiltrated into the device from the first surfaces toward the second surface. Secondly, as the density of the settled cells will become greater near the second surface, spheroids formation can be promoted. In addition to the above advantages, it will become easy to manufacture the device itself.
In another exemplary aspect of the spheroid-producing device, an equivalent diameter of inscribed circles of openings formed by the holes is preferably greater than a length of an equivalent diameter of inscribed circles of openings in the second surface. The equivalent diameter of the inscribed circles of the openings in the second surface is preferably within a range of 200 micrometers to 1 cm. At least portions of the respective wall surfaces preferably include inclinations with an angle greater than one degree and smaller than 90 degrees with respect to the second surface. When a hydrophobic material is used, it is preferable to determine an equivalent radius of the circumscribed circles (a length half of the equivalent diameter) of the openings in the second surface in consideration of a contact angle between the material of the device and the culture medium. When a hydrophilic material is used, it is preferable to determine an equivalent radius of the inscribed circles of the openings in the second surface in consideration of the contact angle between the material of the device and the culture medium.
In another exemplary aspect of a method for recovering spheroids that are produced by using the above mentioned spheroid-producing device, the method includes bringing the second surface of the spheroid-producing device into contact with a solution selected from water, a culture medium, and a buffer solution in order to recover spheroids. Alternatively, the method includes applying a pressure on the first surface of the spheroid-producing device in order for spheroids to be retrieved through the openings in the second surface. According to either of the recovery methods, it is possible to easily recover spheroids without damaging the spheroids.
In still another exemplary aspect of a method for producing spheroids using the above-mentioned spheroid-producing device, the method includes pouring a culture medium containing cells in the respective holes from the first surface, forming droplets in the respective holes, and culturing the cells in the droplets in order to produce spheroids. It is preferable to use the above-mentioned recovery methods in order to recover the spheroids produced by this method.
The exemplary aspect of the present invention is a spheroid-producing device, a method for recovering spheroids, and a method for producing spheroids that are suitable for large-scale production of uniform spheroids by an easy technique. The exemplary aspect of the present invention can provide an easy method suitable for producing a large number of uniform spheroids.
Hereinafter, exemplary embodiment will be described with reference to the drawings. To clarify the description, some parts thereof and some of the drawings have been omitted or simplified as appropriate. Note that in the drawings, elements having the same configuration or function and corresponding parts are denoted by the same reference signs, and repeated descriptions will be omitted.
The spheroid-producing device 1 includes at least a first surface 11, a second surface 12, and wall surfaces 13.
The first surface 11 is an upper surface of the spheroid-producing device 1 and is a surface that is on an upper side when a culture medium and the like are poured in order to culture cells.
The second surface 12 is a surface that faces the first surface 11. The second surface 12 forms a bottom (a bottom surface) of the spheroid-producing device 1 and is a back side surface of the upper surface (the first surface 11).
The wall surfaces 13 form holes (through holes) penetrating through the first surface 11 and the second surface 12. Further, the wall surfaces 13 serve to form openings in the first surface 11 and the second surface 12 and to allow the first surface 11 to communicate with the second surface 12.
In addition, in the spheroid-producing device 1, the holes formed by the wall surfaces 13 are designed in such a way that openings thereof formed closer to the second surface 12 will become smaller than the openings thereof formed closer to the first surface 11. The sizes of the openings are compared using an equivalent diameter.
The term “equivalent diameter” is used as a collective term for an equivalent diameter of an inscribed circle and an equivalent diameter of a circumscribed circle. The “equivalent diameter of the circumscribed circle” is a diameter of circles circumscribing the openings and is used as a diameter of the circumscribed circle drawn on a planar surface that is parallel to the second surface 12. For example, the diameter of the circumscribed circle drawn on a planar surface parallel to the second surface 12 is used as the equivalent diameter of the openings of the holes formed between the first surface 11 and the second surface 12. The “equivalent diameter of the inscribed circle” is a diameter of circles inscribing the openings and is used as a diameter of the inscribed circle drawn on a planar surface that is parallel to the second surface 12. For example, the diameter of the inscribed circle drawn on the planar surface parallel to the second surface 12 is used as the equivalent diameter of the openings of the holes formed between the first surface 11 and the second surface 12. A length denoted by the sign “D” in the drawings is an equivalent diameter Dout of the circumscribed circle or an equivalent diameter Din of the inscribed circle. The sign “D” does not make a clear distinction between Dout and Din.
Details of the size of the openings will be described below with reference to
A configuration of the spheroid-producing device 1 will be described in more detail with reference to
The spheroid-producing device 1 is designed in consideration of at least an angle θi, the equivalent diameter Dout of the circumscribed circles of the openings in the second surface 12 or the equivalent diameter Din of the inscribed circles of the openings in the second surface 12, a material used for the device, and a culture medium 8 used for cell culture. Preferably, a thickness T and a width W may be added to the consideration.
The angle θi is an angle made by inclined surfaces of the wall surfaces 13 make with respect to the second surface 12. At least a portion of the inclined surfaces of the wall surfaces 13 may make the angle θi with respect to the second surface 12. On the other hand, the entire wall surfaces 13 that form the holes may not be inclined at the angle θi. The angle θi is preferably greater than one degree and smaller than 90 degrees and more preferably within a range of 30 to 80 degrees. This is to facilitate the culture medium 8 to be poured into the holes. Alternatively, this is for all of seeded cells to settle down to lower parts of droplets by their own weights without staying on the wall surfaces 13. It is therefore possible to efficiently culture the cells.
The thickness T is a thickness of the spheroid-producing device 1 from the first surface 11 to the second surface 12. The thickness T may be the one that can bear the weight of the culture medium 8.
The equivalent diameter Dout of the circumscribed circles of the openings in the second surface 12 is a diameter of circumscribed circles that circumscribe the openings formed in the second surface 12.
The equivalent diameter Din of the inscribed circles of the openings in the second surface 12 is a diameter of circles that inscribe the openings formed in the second surface 12. Further, an equivalent radius Rout of the circumscribed circles is a half of the lengths of the equivalent diameter Dout of the circumscribed circles. An equivalent radius Rin of the inscribed circles is a half of the lengths of the equivalent diameter Din of the inscribed circles.
In exemplary one embodiment, the equivalent diameter of the inscribed circles of the openings in the first surface 11 are designed in such a way that they will become greater than the equivalent diameter Din of the inscribed circles of the openings in the second surface 12.
In addition, the equivalent diameter Din of the inscribed circles of the openings in the second surface 12 are preferably one to ten times as great as a desired size of a spheroid (e.g., 200 μm to 1 cm). Furthermore, the greater the number of holes per unit area, the more cell aggregates can be produced in a small area. Thus, the equivalent diameter Din of the inscribed circles of the openings in the second surface 12 is more preferably one to two times as great as a desired diameter of a cell aggregate.
The width W of the upper surface is a width between the wall surface 13 that constitutes one hole and another wall surface 13 that constitutes another adjacent hole. Further, the width W of the upper surface is a width at the position where the wall surface 13 inclined at the angle θi with respect to the second surface 12 ends. In other words, the two wall surfaces 13 that constitute the adjacent holes have inclined surfaces from the second surface 12 to the first surface 11, and the width W of the upper surface can be considered as being a width at an edge that enables the inclined surfaces to have the angle θi.
As a modified example of
Details regarding the design of the spheroid-producing device such as quality of a material used for the device, properties of the culture medium used for cell culture, the equivalent diameter, and the like will be described later with reference to the drawings.
Note that in
The spheroid-producing device 1 and the well container 91 may be made of the same material or materials different from each other. Since the well container 91 provides the space into which the culture medium 8 is poured, the well container 91 may be made of any material as long as it is not toxic to the cells. On the other hand, the Petri-dish 92 may be the one that has a shape that will not be brought into contact with the second surface 12 of the spheroid-producing device 1 and the droplets 81.
The container to which the spheroid-producing device 1 is attached is not limited to a structure shown in
Hereinafter, design of the spheroid-producing device will be described in detail. It is preferable that the following physical phenomenon is taken into consideration when the material and surfaces of the spheroid-producing device 1 and the equivalent diameter Din of the inscribed circles of the openings in the second surface 12 or the equivalent diameter Dout of the circumscribed circles of the openings in the second surface 12 are designed. In particular, the contact angle θc between the material of the wall surfaces 13 and the culture medium 8 may be preferably added to the consideration. The reason for that is the contact angle θc of the spheroid-producing device 1 is influenced by quality of the material used for the device, properties of the culture medium, and the like. In the following descriptions, firstly the design of the spheroid-producing device 1 in consideration of the physical phenomenon related to the contact angle θc will be investigated. After that, other elements will be described.
The contact angle θc is determined by the properties of the solid and liquid. To be more specific, the contact angle θc is determined by quality of the material used for the spheroid-producing device 1 (quality of the material that appears on the wall surfaces 13) and the properties of the culture medium 8.
<Investigation on Contact Angle θc>
(1) The case when the contact angle θc is within a range of −1<cos θc≤0.
In this case, the size of the droplets is not influenced by the contact angle. An allowable range is an angle θ0=90 degrees.
When the contact angle θc is within a range of −1<cos θc≤0, the spheroid-producing device 1 is commonly regarded as being made of a hydrophobic material. In this regard, the diameters Din of the inscribed circles of the openings in the second surface 12 are smaller than the diameters of the inscribed circles of the openings in the first surface 11. In addition, the size of the equivalent diameter Dout of the circumscribed circles will become important.
F0 to F2 are present as the forces exerted on the droplet 81 and forces working in parallel to gravity.
F0 is a force of gravity exerted on the droplet 81 and calculated by the following equation.
F0=volume×specific gravity
=V·α
F1 is a force derived from a water pressure of the liquid (the culture medium 8) exerted on the droplet 81 and calculated by the following equation.
F1=water pressure×area=pS
In the case of an atmosphere pressure,
F1=depth from upper liquid surface to droplet×density of liquid×area
=HρS
F2 is a force derived from surface tension of a liquid generated at a periphery of the liquid surface and calculated by the following equation.
F2=outer circumference×liquid surface tension×angle
=LγL sin θ0
The surface tension of the liquid γL can be measured by various methods such as the Wilhelmy method. Alternatively, the information can be obtained from the distributor. The contact angle θc can be measured by measuring the liquid (the culture medium and a buffer solution) and materials to be used using the droplet method and the gas-liquid method.
In
In the above equations, a volume V is a volume [cm3] of the droplets 81, a specific gravity α is a specific gravity of the culture medium 8, a height H is a height equivalent to a depth [cm] from the upper surface of the culture medium 8 to a lower end of the droplet 81, and density ρ is density of the culture medium 8 [g/cm].
An area S is a size of an area of an opening at a position where the droplet 81 is generated (at a position where the droplet is formed in the hole). In this example, the area S is an area [cm2] of a boundary that is brought into contact with the second surface 12 and is the same as an area of the opening in the second surface 12.
A water pressure p is a water pressure [g/cm2] at the opening in the second surface 12. A length L of an outer circumference is a length [cm] of a boundary at which the droplet is brought into contact with the second surface 12. The length L is equivalent to a length of a circumference of the opening in the second surface. The solid liquid surface tension γSL is surface tension (interfacial tension) [g/cm] between the wall surfaces 13 and the culture medium 8. The angle θ0 is an angle the surface of the droplet 81 makes with a horizontal surface or the second surface 12 that is placed horizontally. When the droplet 81 is hemispherical in
When the following equation 1 is satisfied, the droplets 81 are held in the spheroid-producing device 1.
F0+F1<F2 Equation 1
When the droplets stay on the wall surfaces 13 as shown in
F2=LγSL sin θi+LγL sin θ0
(where θi is an inclined angle of the wall surfaces)
Thus, the equation 1 (F0+F1<F2) can be expressed by the following equation 2.
Vα+pS<LγSL sin θi+LγL sin σ0 Equation 2
Further, when the droplets are continuous with the second surface 12 as shown in
F2=LγL sin θ0
Accordingly, the equation 1 (F0+F1<F2) can be expressed by the following equation 3.
Vα+pS<LγL sin θ0 Equation 2-2
Assume that the culture medium 8 is poured up to the height H using a material having the contact angle θc. When the droplets 81 start to become narrow, the droplets 81 start to project outwardly from the second surface 12. At this time, F0+F1=F2 is satisfied. The angle θ0 is 90 degrees (sin 90=1).
F0 can be expressed by the following equation, where V is a volume of the droplet 81, Rout is the equivalent radius of the circumscribed circle of the opening in the second surface 12, and a is the specific gravity.
F0=(( 4/3)πRout3÷2)×α=(⅔)πR3·α
However, when the droplet 81 is hemispherical, the volume V is calculated by [(volume of the sphere)÷2].
Further, the following equation is satisfied, when the area of the opening S and the length of the outer circumference L of the opening are expressed by an equivalent radius R.
S=πRout2,L=2πRout
From the equation 3,
(⅔)Rout3·α+pπRout2
=2πRoutLγL sin 90
In this equation, sin 90=1.
Accordingly,
(⅔)αRout2+pRout=2γL Equation 3
That is, the equivalent diameter Rout of the circumscribed circle in the equation 3 is preferably a maximum equivalent radius of the openings in the second surface 12. The diameters of the openings in the second surface 12 are preferably 2Rout or less. It is more preferable to design the device in consideration of a force (Fc) exerted from gravity on cell aggregates.
As described above, when the contact angle θc is within a range of −1<cos θc<0 (the contact angle is 90 degrees or greater, and θ0 will not exceed θc), it is preferable that the equivalent diameter Dout of the circumscribed circles of the openings in the second surface 12 are less than or equal to twice the equivalent radius of the circumscribed circles calculated by the equation 3. With this exemplary embodiment, the droplets can be maintained in the spheroid-producing device 1.
(2) The case when the contact angle θc is within the range of 0<cos θc<1
When the contact angle θc is within the range of 0<cos θc<1, the spheroid-producing device 1 is commonly regarded as being made of a hydrophilic material. The equivalent diameter of the inscribed circles are used in designing the size of the openings 12 in the second surface when such a material is used.
A relationship between the liquid surface and water pressure will be described with reference to
Therefore, it is preferable to design the spheroid-producing device 1 so that the following conditions are satisfied.
A condition for avoiding the state of
That is,
γS≤γL cos θ0 Equation 5
In comparison between the equation 5 and the Young equation (γS=γSL+γL cos θc), when θ0≤θc is satisfied, droplets are stably maintained.
The contact angle θc is determined by the properties of the solid and liquid, and more specifically, determined by the materials (the materials of the second surface 12 and the wall surfaces 13) of the spheroid-producing device 1 and the properties of the culture medium 8.
The surface tension γSL of the solid is preferably obtained on the Internet (http://www.surface-tension.de/solid-surface-energy.htm) or obtained from a distributor etc. Alternatively, the surface tension γSL of the solid may be calculated using the Zisman method. The surface tension of the liquid γL can be measured by various methods such as the Wilhelmy method. Alternatively, the information can be obtained from a distributor. The contact angle θc can be measured by measuring the liquid (the culture medium and a buffer solution) and materials to be used using the droplet method and the gas-liquid method. Thus, γSL can be derived by substituting the values of γL and γS into the equation of γSL=γL cos θc−γS.
Therefore, the equation 5 is;
γS≤γL cos θc−γS+γL cos θc
γL cos θc−γS≥0 Equation 6
As shown in
ΔP=p=γL(1/r1+1/r2) Equation 7
In the case of an atmospheric pressure, it is expressed by the following equation.
ΔP=Hρ=γL(1/r1+1/r2) Equation 7-2
The droplets have curved surfaces and project downwardly. In this equation, γL is the surface tension of the liquid [g/cm], and r1 [cm] and r2 [cm] are radii of curvature that are orthogonal to each other at one point on the surface.
When the surfaces of the droplets 81 are spherical, r1=r2 is satisfied. Thus,
p=γL×(2/r) Equation 8
In the case of an atmospheric pressure, it is expressed by the following equation.
Hρ=γL×(2/r) Equation 8-2
As described above, from the moment when the droplets flow over the second surface 12, it will be difficult to hold the droplet. In view of the above, with the contact angle θc that is within a range of 0<cos θc<1, a relationship between conditions when θ0=θc and the equivalent diameter Din of the inscribed circles of the openings in the second surface 12 will be examined with reference to
When the culture medium with properties of ρ and γL is poured up to the height H [cm] using a material with a property of γS under an atmospheric pressure, a material that satisfies cos θc>γS/γL, which is derived from the equation 6, is selected.
A vertical auxiliary line is drawn down from a center of a circle that is estimated from the radius of curvature, the following equation is satisfied.
Din=2r·sin θ0
From the equation 8-2, as r=2HργL, it can be expressed by the following equation.
Din=4·γL−sin θ0/Hρ Equation 9
When a limit at which the droplets can flow over the second surface 12, which is when θ0=θc is substituted into the above equation, a maximum diameter Din (max) of the inscribed circles that can hold the droplets is expressed by the following equation.
Din(max)=4·γL·sin θc/Hρ Equation 9-2
That is, it is preferable to design the device in such a way that the diameters of the inscribed circles will be smaller than the value calculated by the above formula.
When the device is designed under such conditions, regardless of the contact angle θc (i.e., whether the material of the device is hydrophobic or hydrophilic), it is preferable to consider absorption of protein contained the culture medium into the material when the device is designed. It is thus preferable that the size of the openings in the second surface 12 is a value within a range of 20 to 80% of a maximum value of the calculated equivalent radius R. Further, it is preferable to adjust the height H of the culture medium 8 in such a way that a water pressure derived from the height H of the culture medium 8 will be within a range of 50 to 80% of the calculated maximum water pressure p in order to adjust the amount of the culture medium.
As described above, it is possible to manufacture the spheroid-producing device 1 in which droplets are appropriately formed by designing the equivalent diameter Din of the inscribed circles and the equivalent diameter Dout of the circumscribed circles according to the contact angle θc. In other words, it is possible to design and produce the spheroid-producing device 1 according to the material used for the spheroid-producing device 1 and the properties of the culture medium 8 used for cell culture. As the droplets suitable for cell culture can be formed by the spheroid-producing device 1, it is expected that a large number of spheroids can be efficiently produced using the spheroid-producing device 1. In addition, it is expected that uniform spheroids be produced by forming appropriate droplets using the spheroid-producing device 1.
Note that in the above (1) to (3), the equations used to design the spheroid-producing device 1 according to the range in which the value of the contact angle θc can be included have been presented. This is because it is preferable to test several design methods according to the material of the spheroid-producing device 1 or the properties of the culture medium 8. Further, this is because the spheroid-producing device 1 is designed and manufactured using preferable equation(s) as appropriate.
<Width of Upper Surface>
A width W of the upper surface of a wall that partitions spaces is preferably 5 mm or less. More preferably, the width W is 2 mm or less so that cells will not stay or stand still on the upper surface (on the first surface 11 and near the first surface 11). It is preferable to consider a shape of the upper surface (a shape of an upper portion from the first surface 11 to the width of the upper surface) together with the width W of the upper surface. This will be described later in detail with reference to
<Material of Spheroid-Producing Device>
The spheroid-producing device 1 is preferably a resin molding made of one of or a combination of acrylic resin, polylactic acid, polyglycolic acid, styrene resin, acrylic-styrene copolymer resin, polycarbonate resin, polyester resin, polyvinyl alcohol resin, ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer resin, thermoplastic elastomer vinyl chloride resin, silicone resin, and silicon resin. This is because resin that can be molded is used in order to manufacture devices at a low cost and in large numbers.
Further, when the spheroid-producing device 1 is the above-mentioned resin molding, it is preferable to form functional groups at least on the wall surfaces 13 by the surface modification treatment, which is one of or a combination of plasma treatment, corona discharge, and UV ozone treatment. Functional groups may be formed on the entire spheroid-producing device 1. This is because when the device is too hydrophobic or when the openings are too small, providing the device with a hydrophilic property enables a culture medium to be smoothly poured into the openings.
Furthermore, when the spheroid-producing device 1 is the above-mentioned resin molding, it is preferable that at least the wall surfaces 13 are coated with a substance made of one of or a combination of inorganic substances, metal, synthetic polymers, dimers, trimers, tetramers, and biobased polymers. Alternatively, the entire spheroid-producing device 1 may be coated with these substances. The reason for this is the same as the one described above. Additionally, it is extremely effective to coat the surface with the above material(s) and to thereby form a hydrophobic surface. This is because when a culture medium having low surface tension is used, a hydrophobic surface of the device is more effective than a hydrophilic surface of the device, provided that both of the devices have holes with the same equivalent diameter.
Moreover, it is preferable that the spheroid-producing device 1 is a molding made of one of or a combination of inorganic substances such as metal and glass. When the spheroid-producing device 1 is the above-mentioned molding, it is preferable to modify at least the wall surfaces 13 by the surface modification treatment, which includes one of or a combination of plasma treatment, corona discharge, and UV ozone treatment. The entire surface of the spheroid-producing device 1 may be modified. The reason for this is the same as the one described above. Additionally, it is extremely effective to create a more hydrophobic surface by coating the surface with the above-mentioned material. This is because when a culture medium having low surface tension is used, a hydrophobic surface of the device is more effective than a hydrophilic surface of the device, provided that both of the devices have holes with the same equivalent diameter.
Alternatively, when the spheroid-producing device 1 is the above-mentioned molding, at least the wall surfaces 13 are coated with a substance made of one of or a combination of inorganic substances, metal, polymer, diners, trimers, and tetramers. The entire spheroid-producing device 1 may be coated with these substances. The reason for this is the same as the one described above. Additionally, it is extremely effective to create a more hydrophobic surface by coating the surface with the above-mentioned material. This is because when a culture medium having low surface tension is used, a hydrophobic surface of the device is more effective than a hydrophilic surface of the device, provided that both of the devices have holes with the same equivalent diameter.
In addition to the above processing, at least the front surfaces of the wall surfaces 13 or the entire spheroid-producing device 1 preferably includes nanometer order microstructures. The microstructures are, for example, structures with their front surfaces processed to have uneven surfaces. Properties of the material front surface are not specified by the material of the device but are specified by the properties of the material front surface. As hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the front surface of the material can be controlled in aftertreatment, any material may be used as a material for the device.
<Method for Recovering Spheroids>
An outline of a method for producing spheroids using the above-mentioned spheroid-producing device 1 and a method for recovering the produced spheroids will be described below.
The produced spheroids 7 are recovered by, for example, the methods shown in
As described above, with the spheroid-producing device 1 according to this exemplary embodiment, it is possible to generate droplets in a plurality of holes and to produce spheroids. It is thus possible to efficiently produce a large number of spheroids. When the size of the plurality of holes is formed to be the same, uniform spheroids can be produced. In addition, a culture medium can be poured from the side of the first surface 11 (the upper side) into the spheroid-producing device 1. Further, the culture medium can be exchanged from the side of the first surface 11. Accordingly, an operation of the spheroid-producing device 1 is easy. Furthermore, a structure of the spheroid-producing device 1 can be simple by designing the spheroid-producing device 1 based on the physical phenomenon. It is thus possible to easily manufacture the spheroid-producing device 1 itself compared to the suspension plate disclosed in patent literature 2. Consequently, it is possible to greatly reduce a cost and a working time for producing spheroids.
In the first exemplary embodiment, although the spheroid-producing device 1 having shapes of the holes shown in
The shapes of the upper surfaces may be, as shown in the examples of
The spheroid-producing device 1d shown in
Alternatively, as shown in
In the first exemplary embodiment, cases in which the openings formed in the first surface 11 and the second surface 12 shown in
In addition, in one exemplary embodiment of the spheroid-producing device, for example, holes may be created by punching a thin sheet-like film or a mold may be created, into which resin is poured, and then the resin may be molded into the device. In this regard, the equivalent diameter of the inscribed circles of the openings in the upper surface is made to be greater than the equivalent diameter Din of the inscribed circle of the openings in the lower surface. Moreover, a support(s) for reinforcing the film or resin may be included in order to support the weight of the culture medium. When the thickness of the film or resin is increased, the device may be hollowed out in order to reduce the weight of the device.
A test for producing spheroids was carried out. Firstly, a spheroid-producing device 1x having the shapes shown in
The spheroid-producing device 1x was manufactured with the following size in which one pitch PI is 1.00 mm.
Equivalent diameter D of second surface 12x: 0.25 mm
Angle θi: 67.5 degrees
Thickness T: 0.74 mm
Width W of upper surface: 0.184 mm
The size of the well container 91x is shown below.
Diameter of inner circumference of well container L1: 31 mm
Height of well container L3: 1.5 cm
1. Culture Container
A material having a contact angle θc within a range of −1<cos θc<0 was used. Silicone (manufacturer: KCC and grade: SL7260) was used as a material for the spheroid-producing device. As the culture medium, 10% FBS added DMEM/F12 was used. Hereinafter, the culture medium will be referred to as a culture medium A.
<Design of Spheroid-Producing Device>
The above-mentioned equation 3 (which is mentioned again below) was used.
(⅔)αR2+pR=2γL Equation 3
In this example, the design was carried out under a condition of using pure water.
The surface tension γL of the liquid of the culture medium A can be measured by various methods such as the Wilhelmy method. Alternatively, the information can be obtained from a distributor. The contact angle θc of the pure water with respect to the material of the device measured using the droplet method was 91 degrees (cos 91 degrees=−0.017). Note that the culture medium and the pure water used in this example exhibit a value of the contact angle θc that is close to the above value.
When the culture medium A is used, the above values are substituted into the equation 3 in order to calculate the equivalent radius Rout of the circumscribed circles.
(⅔)×1.00×R2+1×1.00×R=2×7×10−2
R=0.123,−1.629
As the equivalent radius Rout of the circumscribed circles is a positive value, the following value was defined.
R=0.123 cm=1230μm
The equivalent diameter Dout of the circumscribed circles was 285 μm that is 23% of the calculated value. At this time, reduced hydrophobic properties caused by absorption of protein, a force from a gravity of spheroids, and possibility that the droplets cannot be held due to culture medium exchange or a media exchange were considered. The angle θi was 67.5 degrees. Further, the openings were designed in such a way that the size of which will become 1 mm. As shown in
A low adhesion container, which was obtained by pasting a silicone resin (KE-1603(A/B) manufactured by Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. on a bottom of a glass Petri-dish with a diameter of 5 cm was used.
2. Culture Method
(1) A cell suspension that has been adjusted to contain 2.5 million mouse ES cells in a culture medium of 10 mL was added in a well shown in
(2) In the example, the second surface 12 was brought into contact with the culture medium, and spheroids were recovered and then observed. In the comparative example, the cell suspension was not transferred to another container, and spheroids were observed in the cultured container.
(3) Spheroids were observed by an inverted microscope, and diameters thereof were measured using an obtained image.
3. Result
An average value (μm), sample standard deviation (SD), and variations (that is defined by dividing SD by the average value of the diameters) of the diameters of cell aggregates are shown in the table 1. As can be seen from the value of SD/average diameter, variations in the example 1 were ⅓ or less of variations in the comparative example 1.
An investigation was carried out as to whether or not cell aggregates with a uniform diameter can be formed even with different number of cells. Table 2 shows a result of the investigation. With the equivalent diameter D designed this time, in the cases of 1500 and 1000 cells per opening, variations were about 10% lower than those in the comparative example. In the case of 500 cells per opening, the variations were comparable to those in the comparative example.
Note that the present invention is not limited by the above exemplary embodiments, and modifications can be made as appropriate without departing from the scope of the invention.
The present application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-034577, filed on Feb. 25, 2014, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2014-034577 | Feb 2014 | JP | national |
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/121,322 filed on Aug. 24, 2016, which claims the benefit of national stage application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/JP2015/000950, filed Feb. 25, 2015, which claims the benefit of priority of Japan Application Serial No. 2014-034577 filed on Feb. 25, 2014, contents of which are relied upon and incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6027695 | Oldenburg et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 8575312 | Behrens et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 20060281172 | Kuwabara et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20100297767 | Hattori et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110306122 | Moritz et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20130040855 | Takayama et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130203159 | Itoh et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 102257123 | Nov 2011 | CN |
| 2012-502636 | Feb 2012 | JP |
| 5074382 | Nov 2012 | JP |
| 2013-517809 | May 2013 | JP |
| 2014-034577 | Feb 2014 | JP |
| 10-2007-0075006 | Jul 2007 | KR |
| 10-0785049 | Dec 2007 | KR |
| 10-2013-0033938 | Apr 2013 | KR |
| 2007114351 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| 2010031194 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| 2012036011 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| 2013047974 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 2014165273 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| 1536 Well Microplates—Corning Inc. https://www.coming.com/catalog/cls/documents/drawings/MD_Microplate_Dimension_Sheets_1536_Well.pdf (Year 2016). |
| 384 Well Microplates—Corning Inc. http://csmedia2.coming.com/lifesciences/media/equipment_compatibility/MD_Microplate_Dimension_Sheets_384_Well.pdf (Year: 2016). |
| 96 Well Microplates—Corning Inc. http://csmedia2.coming.com/lifesciences/media/equipment_compatibility/MD_Microplate_Dimension_Sheets_96_Well.pdf (Year: 2016). |
| C. L. Bauwens et al., “Control of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Colony and Aggregate Size Heterogeneity Influences Differentiation Trajectories”, Stem Cells, vol. 26, (2008), pp. 2300-2310. |
| Combined Office Action and Search Report dated May 18, 2017 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580010448.4 (with Partial English translation and English translation of categories of cited documents). |
| E. Eschbach et al., Microstructured Scaffolds for Liver Tissue Cultures of High Cell Density: Morphological and Biochemical Characterization of Tissue Aggregates, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 95, (2005), pp. 243-255. |
| Extended Search Report dated Oct. 12, 2017 in European Patent Application No. 15755340.5. |
| International Search Report dated Jun. 2, 2015, in PCT/JP2015/000950 filed Feb. 25, 2015. |
| K. M. Yamada et al., “Modeling Tissue Morphogenesis and Cancer in 3D”, Cell 130, (Aug. 24, 2007), pp. 601-610. |
| Machine Translation of JP2016505070 Office Action dated May 13, 2019, Japan Patent Office, 2 Pgs. |
| S. Rungarunlert et al., “Embryoid body formation from embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells: Benefits of bioreactors”, World Journal of Stem Cells, vol. 1(1), (Dec. 2009), pp. 11-21. |
| S. Sumi et al., “New Culturing Equipment for Effectively Generating High-quality Cell Aggregation—Development of Entire Surface Multi-hole Type Culturing Surface”, Multi-Hole Type Culturing Surface, vol. 14, Suppl. 0-52-2, (Feb. 1, 2015), with English Translation, 5 pages. |
| S.R. Horman, et al., “3D High-Content Analysis of Spheroids New Methodology Shown to Improve Screening”, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News, Tutorials, vol. 33, No. 16, (Sep. 15, 2013), 3 pages. |
| Tung, Y-C. et al. 2011. High-throughput 3D spheroid culture and drug testing using a 384 hanging drop array. Analyst 136: 473-478. specif, pp. 473, 474. |
| Written Opinion dated Oct. 24, 2017 in Singaporean Patent Application No. 11201606992P. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200255782 A1 | Aug 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15121322 | US | |
| Child | 16864446 | US |
