The present disclosure generally relates to a rock crushing machine, such as a rock crusher of configurations commonly referred to as gyratory or cone crushers. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to a spider for use in a gyratory crusher or cone crusher including multiple spider arms each including an open channel formed between two spaced flanges.
Rock crushing machines break apart rock, stone or other materials in a crushing cavity formed between a downwardly expanding conical mantle installed on a mainshaft that gyrates within an outer upwardly expanding frustoconically shaped assembly of concaves inside a crusher shell assembly. The conical mantle and the mainshaft are circularly symmetric about an axis that is inclined with respect to the vertical shell assembly axis. These axes intersect near the top of the rock crusher. The inclined axis is driven circularly about the vertical axis thereby imparting a gyrational motion to the mainshaft and mantle. The gyrational motion causes points on the mantle surface to alternately advance toward and retreat away from the stationary concaves. During retreat of the mantle, material to be crushed falls deeper into the cavity where it is crushed when motion reverses and the mantle advances toward the concaves.
A spider is attached to the top of the shell assembly, forming the top of the support structure for the mainshaft. The material to be crushed is typically dropped onto an abrasion resistant spider arm shields that are positioned over the arms and central hub of the spider, after which the material to be crushed falls into the crushing cavity. The spider includes a central hub and bushing that receive one end of the mainshaft. The crushing forces generated in the crushing cavity create very large loads that are imposed in part on the spider. The spider must be constructed to withstand such loads to avoid having to shut down a crushing line, or an entire mine, to replace and/or repair a damaged spider.
The present disclosure relates to a gyratory crusher including a spider for use in breaking rock, stone, or other materials in a crushing cavity. The spider formed in accordance with the present disclosure includes a central hub and bushing that receives one end of a gyrating mainshaft positioned within a shell assembly of the crusher. A plurality of spider arms, typically two, extends from the central hub to an outer rim to support the central hub generally along a center axis of the crusher. Each spider arm is fitted with a spider arm shield to protect the spider arm from rocks and debris during use.
Each of the spider arms is formed from a pair of generally vertically oriented flanges with an underlying web to define a channel. The channel formed between the pair of flanges is open to the top.
In an embodiment in which the channel is open vertically upward, the pair of flanges and the web form a connecting beam between the central hub and the outer rim of the spider. The connecting beam that forms each of the spider arms has a shear center typically below the connecting web of the beam. Such configuration minimizes damaging torsional stresses that characteristically reduce the strength of open sections relative to closed sections of a similar size.
Various other features, objects and advantages of the invention will be made apparent from the following description taken together with the drawings.
The drawings illustrate the best mode presently contemplated of carrying out the disclosure. In the drawings:
a is a partial cross-section view of a prior art spider;
b is a cross-section view of one arm of a prior art spider;
The upper end 40 of the mainshaft 38 is supported in a bushing 39 contained within a central hub 42 of a spider 44. The spider 44 is mounted to the upper top shell 26 and includes at least a pair of spider arms 46 that support the central hub 42, as illustrated. In the embodiment illustrated, a pair of spider arm shields 48 are each mounted to the spider arms 46 to provide wear protection. A spider cap 50 mounts over the central hub 42, as illustrated.
a provides a detailed view of the prior art spider 44 used in the gyratory rock crusher 10 shown in
b illustrates a cross-section view of one of the spider arms 46. As illustrated in
The spider 72 includes a pair of spider arms 78 extending from the central hub 70 and joined to an outer rim 80. Outer rim 80 includes a series of mounting holes 82 that allow the spider 72 to be securely attached to the upper top shell 26. When the spider 72 is mounted to the upper top shell 26, a set of rim liners 84 are positioned over the outer rim 80 to provide wear resistance for the outer rim 80.
When the spider 72 is mounted to the upper top shell 26, spider arm shield 74 is mounted to each of the spider arms 78 to provide wear protection for the spider arm. As illustrated in
Each of the spider arm shields 74 includes a dead bed 75 formed on the top of the arm shield. The dead bed 75 accumulates some of the material being crushed such that when additional material moves toward the spider, the material contacts the accumulated material in the dead bed 75 to reduce wear on the arm shield 74. The spider cap 76 includes a similar dead bed 77 that functions in the same manner. Although the embodiment shown in the Figures includes the dead beds 75 and 77, the dead beds could be eliminated from the design while operating within the scope of the present disclosure.
Referring to
As shown in
The spider arms 78 function as structural members to support the central hub 70 having an upper bushing which in turn supports the upper end of the mainshaft 38. Crushing forces on the mantle are transmitted to the mainshaft, resulting in reactive forces at the upper bushing where the forces are transmitted to the central hub 70. The forces are generally horizontal and vary in magnitude and direction as dictated by the gyrational motion of the mainshaft and the crushing resistance of the rock in the crushing cavity. Accordingly, the loads imposed upon the spider are sometimes transverse, in whole or in part and of either sense, to the direction defined by the length of the spider arms 78 and hub 70 spanning the outer rim. All loads from the mainshaft carried by the spider arms 78 must be equilibrated by support forces at the junctions of the arms to the outer rim and the upper top shell, but the transverse force components are most critical regarding deformations and stresses in the spider arms 78. The internal loads carried by the spider arms 78 cause a variety of deformations including bending, extension, and shear, but twisting deformations and associated stresses due to transverse loads can be the most damaging to open sections. However, the open channel configuration of the spider arms 78 shown in
The shear center for a beam is a point on a cross section where a transverse force can be applied without inducing any torsional deformations on the beam. In general, open sections are more vulnerable to torsional stresses and deformations than closed sections, such as circular or rectangular tubes. The shear center is the location through which transverse forces must be applied to minimize torsional effects that increase with offset distance between the line of force application and the shear center.
In the embodiment shown in
The configuration of the spider 72 having the open channel between the pair of spaced flanges 90 and the web 96 greatly reduces the complexity of the manufacturing process, which reduces the cost of producing the spider. Unlike the prior art spider 44 including the enclosed spider arms 46 shown in
a illustrates an alternate embodiments that include both an open upper channel 106 and an open lower channel 108 separated by the connecting web 96. In each of the embodiments shown in
Although the spider 72 is shown and described in the present disclosure as being used with a gyratory crusher, it should be understood that a similar structural component is sometimes used with cone crushers. It is contemplated that the design of the present disclosure could also be used with a cone crusher.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2832547 | Kennedy | Apr 1958 | A |
3456889 | Burkhardt et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
3774857 | Decker et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3813047 | Torrence et al. | May 1974 | A |
3908915 | Milenkovic | Sep 1975 | A |
4037800 | Coxhill | Jul 1977 | A |
4172339 | Balz | Oct 1979 | A |
4339087 | Pollak | Jul 1982 | A |
4391414 | Reiter | Jul 1983 | A |
5035368 | Finley et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5152468 | Virtamo et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5350125 | Clark | Sep 1994 | A |
5810269 | Shannon | Sep 1998 | A |
5934583 | Jean | Aug 1999 | A |
6536694 | Van Mullem | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6772970 | Davis et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7195186 | Van Mullem | Mar 2007 | B2 |
20020170994 | Van Mullem | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20050269436 | Sawant et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110192927 A1 | Aug 2011 | US |