The present invention relates generally to interbody spinal implants preferably adapted for placement into an implantation space created across the height of a disc space between two adjacent vertebral bodies for the purpose of correcting spinal disease at that interspace. The spinal implants are made of an implant material that is other than bone and may or may not be resorbable. The implants are adapted such that fusion occurs at least in part through the implants.
Implants for placement between adjacent vertebral bodies in the spine come in a variety of shapes and sizes and are made of a variety of materials. Such implants for use in human spinal surgery include implants made of selected inert materials, such as titanium, that have a structure designed to promote fusion of the adjacent vertebral bodies by allowing bone to grow through the implant to thereby fuse the adjacent vertebral bodies.
The spinal disc that resides between adjacent vertebral bodies maintains the spacing between those vertebral bodies and, in a healthy spine, allows for relative motion between the vertebrae. At the time of surgery, for example in the instance where fusion is intended to occur between adjacent vertebral bodies of a patient's spine, the surgeon typically prepares an opening at the site of the intended fusion by removing some or all of the disc material that exists between the adjacent vertebral bodies to be fused. Because the outermost layers of bone of the vertebral end plate are relatively inert to new bone growth, the surgeon must work on the end plate to remove at least the outermost cell layers of bone to gain access to the blood-rich, vascular bone tissue within the vertebral body. In this manner, the vertebrae are prepared in a way that encourages new bone to grow into or through an implant that is placed between the vertebral bodies.
Present methods of forming this space between adjacent vertebral bodies generally include the use of one or more of the following: hand held biting and grasping instruments known as rongeurs; drills and drill guides; rotating burrs driven by a motor; osteotomes and chisels, and a double wheel cutter or vertebral interspace preparation device. In particular, the double wheel cutter or vertebral interspace preparation device, as disclosed by Michelson in WO 99/63891, incorporated herein by reference, is adapted for linear insertion, i.e., insertion along a single axis, and without the need to substantially move the device from side to side within the disc space along a second axis. In such a preferred embodiment, the device has at its working end an abrading element having a width generally corresponding to the width of the implant to be implanted.
There is a desire to improve congruity at the interfaces of the implant to the adjacent vertebral bodies, and to achieve stability of the implant. Therefore it is advantageous for the contour of the implants to closely match the implantation space formed between and at least in part into the adjacent vertebral bodies to allow a more uniform load transfer across the implant between the vertebral bodies.
As it is desirable to take advantage of all these benefits, there exists a need for an improved interbody spinal fusion implant made of a material other than bone having a configuration that provides for an improved congruity of the implant to the vertebral bodies and improved implant stability.
In accordance with the purposes of the present invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, an artificial interbody spinal fusion implant made of a material other than bone is provided for insertion at least in part into an implantation space formed across the height of a disc space between adjacent vertebral bodies of a human spine. The implant includes a leading end for insertion first into the disc space and a trailing end opposite the leading end. The implant has a length from the leading end to the trailing end. The leading end is configured in the shape of approximately one half of a circle from side to side. The implant also includes opposed upper and lower portions between the leading and trailing ends that are adapted to be placed within the disc space to contact and support the adjacent vertebral bodies. The upper and lower portions are non-arcuate along at least a portion of the length of the implant. The upper and lower portions include at least one opening in communication with one another and adapted to hold bone growth promoting material for permitting for the growth of bone from vertebral body to vertebral body through the implant. The implant also includes opposite sides between the upper portion and lower portion, and between the leading and trailing ends. At least one of the opposite sides is at least in part straight along at least a portion of the length of the implant.
In accordance with the purposes of the present invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, an interbody spinal fusion implant made of a material other than bone is provided for insertion at least in part into an implantation space formed across the height of a disc space between adjacent vertebral bodies of a human spine. The implant includes a leading end for insertion first into the disc space and a trailing end opposite the leading end. The implant has a length from the leading end to the trailing end. The leading end is configured from side to side in the shape of approximately one half of a first circle. The trailing end has a radius of curvature of a second circle from side to side. The second circle has a radius greater than the radius of the first circle. The implant also includes opposed upper and lower portions between the leading and trailing ends that are adapted to be placed within the disc space to contact and support the adjacent vertebral bodies. The upper and lower portions include at least one opening in communication with one another and adapted to hold bone growth promoting material for permitting for the growth of bone from vertebral body to vertebral body through the implant. The implant has a maximum width that is greater than one-half of the width of the adjacent vertebral: bodies into which the implant is adapted to be inserted.
Additional objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
The following description is intended to be representative only and not limiting and many variations can be anticipated according to these teachings, which are included within the scope of this inventive teaching. Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of this invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
Implantation space 50 is preferably formed in the endplate region ER in the subchondral bone of the vertebral body V. Implantation space 50 preferably is formed to have a leading edge 52 with a shape from side to side of approximately one-half of a first circle A. The trailing portion 54 of implantation space 50 preferably includes at least a portion of the anterior aspect of the vertebral body having a radius of curvature of a second circle B from side to side. Preferably the radius of circle A is less than the radius of circle B. Implantation space 50 may further include side edges 56, 58. Side edges 56, 58 preferably include at least a straight portion, may be parallel to one another along lines P and form a curved transition with leading edge 52.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, leading end 102, trailing end 104, and opposite sides 110, 112 may have various configurations. Leading end 102 is preferably is in the shape of approximately half a first circle from side to side. Where the implantation space is prepared into the vertebral bodies to have a lip or ridge that is at least in part curved, leading end 102 may be adapted to abut at least that portion of the implantation space.
One or both of sides 110, 112 may also be formed to be at least in part oriented generally parallel to the mid-longitudinal axis of implant 100 and/or to each other. One or both of sides 110, 112 may include at least one opening 119 to permit for the growth of bone therethrough and into implant 100, though the invention is not so limited. Further, leading end 102 may be tapered to facilitate insertion of implant 100 between the two adjacent vertebral bodies.
Trailing end 104 preferably forms an arc of a second circle from side to side having a radius greater than the radius of the first circle associated with leading end 102. Preferably, at least a portion of trailing end 104 is adapted to conform to at least a portion of the peripheral contour of the anterior aspect of the vertebral bodies adjacent the disc space into which the implant is adapted to be inserted, though the invention is not so limited.
As shown in
As shown in
Bone for use as the base material used to form the implant of the preferred embodiment is specifically excluded for the purpose of this application. Where the implants are for spinal fusion, it is appreciated that they may be adapted to receive fusion promoting substances and/or materials within them such as, but not limited to cancellous bone, bone derived products, or others. In a preferred embodiment, the material of the implant is formed of material other than bone, such as metal including, but not limited to, titanium and its alloys, ASTM material, cobalt chrome, or tantalum, ceramic, various surgical grade plastics, plastic composites, carbon fiber composites, coral, and can include artificial materials which are at least in part bioresorbable.
Upper and lower surfaces that are angled relative to each other, when subsequently implanted into the spine, position the adjacent vertebral bodies in angular relationship to each other to restore the natural curvature of the spine, such as lordosis for example.
The implant may have a selected shape suitable for the intended purpose. For example only, the leading end may be in the shape of approximately one half of a circle from side to side. The sides may be at least in part straight. The trailing end may have any desired shape suitable for the intended purpose and may preferably conform to the anatomical contour of the adjacent vertebral bodies between which the implant is adapted to be inserted. Implant 100 preferably has a length greater than one-half the depth of the vertebral bodies adjacent the disc space into which the implant is adapted to be inserted as measured between the anterior and posterior aspects of the vertebral bodies. Implant 100 also preferably has a maximum width that is greater than one-half the width of the adjacent vertebral bodies into which the implant is adapted to be inserted.
Leading portions 302′, 302″ of each member 300′, 300″, respectively, form leading end 302 of implant 300 when the members are placed side by side to one another. Leading end 302 of implant 300 is preferably configured in the shape of one-half a first circle from side to side. Trailing end 304, composed of trailing portions 304′, 304″ when members 300′, 300″ are placed side by side to one another, may, but need not be formed as an arc of a second circle side to side having a radius greater than a radius of the first circle associated with leading end 302 of implant 300.
Member 300′ is placed side by side with member 300″ so that a portion of interior side 310′ of each member are adjacent one another. Top 306′ and bottom 308′ preferably have at least one opening 314′ passing therethrough between leading and trailing portions 302′, 304′, respectively, and sides 310′, 312′. Openings 314′ are adapted to hold bone growth promoting material to permit for the growth of bone from vertebral body to vertebral body through openings 314. Interior side 310′ may also include at least one opening 314′ passing therethrough configured to permit bone growth between and into adjacent members 300′, 300″. Member 300′ preferably has a maximum width W that is less than approximately one-half the width of the adjacent vertebral bodies into which the member is adapted to be inserted. Also, the combined width of both members 300′, 300″ is preferably greater than one-half the width of the adjacent vertebral bodies into which the members are adapted to be inserted.
Members 300′, 300″ provide the added advantage in that each member can be inserted through a smaller space than a single larger implant, to achieve the same effect as the larger implant.
In another preferred embodiment the implant of the present invention may be adapted for use from an anterior approach to the spine and have a maximum width between its sides that is less than one-half of the width of the adjacent vertebral bodies into which the implant is adapted to be inserted. The implant may have a leading end that is shaped as approximately one-half a first circle. The implant may also have a trailing end that forms an arc of a second circle having a radius that is substantially greater than the radius of the first circle associated with the leading end.
In another preferred embodiment, the implant of the present invention may be adapted for use from an anterior approach to the spine and have preferably both the leading and trailing ends in the shape of approximately one half of a circle side to side.
In another preferred embodiment the implant of the present invention may be adapted for use from a posterior approach to the spine and have a trailing end that is preferably at least in part straight from side to side.
In a preferred embodiment, implant 400 may be adapted to receive through bone screw receiving holes 420 at trailing end 404 at least a pair of opposed appropriately sized bone screws 422. Bone engaging screws 422 may be aligned or offset from each other. At least one screw 422 engages each of the vertebral bodies adjacent a disc space to be fused and into which implant 400 is implanted. A purpose of the bone screws is to rigidly secure the implant within the vertebral segment. A further purpose is to pull each of the adjacent vertebral bodies toward the implant and towards each other. Trailing end 404 of implant 400 preferably includes a recess 424 having bone screw receiving holes 420 therein and an opening 426 configured to cooperatively receive a locking cap 428 adapted to lock at least one bone screw 422 to implant 400.
As shown in
The implant, bone screws, and/or locks can be made of a bioresorbable material, including but not limited to plastics and composite plastics. Suitable plastics may include those comprising lactides, galactides, glycolide, capronlactone, trimethylene carbonate, or dioxanone in various polymers, and/or combinations thereof.
By way of example only and not limitation, for use in the lumbar spine, the implants of the present invention may have a depth of approximately, 28-36 mm, a width of approximately, 30-38 mm, and a height (max) of approximately 8-20 mm. The radius of curvature of the leading end may be approximately 15-19 mm and the radius of curvature of the trailing end may be approximately 20-30 mm.
In any of the embodiments of the present invention, the implant may include, be made of, treated, coated, filled, used in combination with, or have a hollow or opening for containing artificial or naturally occurring materials and/or substances suitable for implantation in the human spine. These materials and/or substances include any source of osteogenesis, bone growth promoting materials, bone, bone derived substances or products, demineralized bone matrix, mineralizing proteins, ossifying proteins, bone morphogenetic proteins, hydroxyapatite, genes coding for the production of bone, and bone including, but not limited to, cortical bone. The implant can include at least in part of materials that are bioabsorbable and/or resorbable in the body such as bone and/or bone growth promoting materials. The implant of the present invention can be formed of a porous material or can be formed of a material that intrinsically participates in the growth of bone from one of adjacent vertebral bodies to the other of adjacent vertebral bodies. Where such implants are for posterior implantation, the trailing ends of such implants may be treated with, coated with, or used in combination with chemical substances to inhibit scar tissue formation in the spinal canal. The implant of the present invention may be modified, or used in combination with materials to make it antibacterial, such as, but not limited to, electroplating or plasma spraying with silver ions or other substance. At least a portion of the implant may be treated to promote bone ingrowth between the implant and the adjacent vertebral bodies. The implant of the present invention may be used in combination with a spinal fixation implant such as any object, regardless of material, that can be inserted into any portion of the spine, such as but not limited to interbody spinal implants, structural bone grafts, mesh, cages, spacers, staples, bone screws, plates, rods, tethers of synthetic cords or wires, or other spinal fixation hardware
While the shapes of the various aspects of the implant have been described precisely, the scope of the present invention is not so limited and it is readily anticipated that the contours may be interrupted by minor irregularities such as for example only for the purpose of engaging the bone, encouraging the ingrowth or through growth of bone.
While specific innovative features were presented in reference to specific examples, they are just examples, and it should be understood that various combinations of these innovative features beyond those specifically shown are taught such that they may now be easily alternatively combined and are hereby anticipated and claimed.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/455,415, filed Jun. 2, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,935,149; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/089,057, filed Mar. 24, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,540,882; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/112,747, filed Apr. 2, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,890,355; which claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/281,187, filed Apr. 3, 2001, and Provisional Application No. 60/281,124, filed Apr. 2, 2001; all of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2677369 | Knowles | May 1954 | A |
3426364 | Lumb | Feb 1969 | A |
3848601 | Ma et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3867728 | Stubstad et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3875595 | Froning | Apr 1975 | A |
3905047 | Long | Sep 1975 | A |
D245259 | Shen | Aug 1977 | S |
4070514 | Eatherly | Jan 1978 | A |
4309777 | Patil | Jan 1982 | A |
4349921 | Kuntz | Sep 1982 | A |
4501269 | Bagby | Feb 1985 | A |
RE31865 | Roux | Apr 1985 | E |
4599086 | Doty | Jul 1986 | A |
4636217 | Ogilvie et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4714469 | Kenna | Dec 1987 | A |
4743256 | Brantigan | May 1988 | A |
4759766 | Buettner-Janz et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4759769 | Hedman et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4820305 | Harms et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4834757 | Brantigan | May 1989 | A |
4863476 | Shepperd | Sep 1989 | A |
4863477 | Monson | Sep 1989 | A |
4877020 | Vich | Oct 1989 | A |
4878915 | Brantigan | Nov 1989 | A |
4904261 | Dove et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4911718 | Lee et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4936848 | Bagby | Jun 1990 | A |
4955908 | Frey et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4961740 | Ray et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5015247 | Michelson | May 1991 | A |
5015255 | Kuslich | May 1991 | A |
5026373 | Ray et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5047055 | Bao | Sep 1991 | A |
5055104 | Ray | Oct 1991 | A |
5059193 | Kuslich | Oct 1991 | A |
5062845 | Kuslich et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5071437 | Steffee | Dec 1991 | A |
5122130 | Keller | Jun 1992 | A |
5123926 | Pisharodi | Jun 1992 | A |
5171278 | Pisharodi | Dec 1992 | A |
5192327 | Brantigan | Mar 1993 | A |
5246458 | Graham | Sep 1993 | A |
5258031 | Salib et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5290312 | Kojimoto et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5306308 | Gross et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306309 | Wagner et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5370697 | Baumgartner | Dec 1994 | A |
5397364 | Kozak et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5423855 | Marienne | Jun 1995 | A |
5425772 | Brantigan | Jun 1995 | A |
5443514 | Steffee | Aug 1995 | A |
5458638 | Kuslich et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5484437 | Michelson | Jan 1996 | A |
5489307 | Kuslich et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5507813 | Dowd et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5522899 | Michelson | Jun 1996 | A |
5534031 | Matsuzaki et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5571109 | Bertagnoli | Nov 1996 | A |
D377527 | Michelson | Jan 1997 | S |
5593409 | Michelson | Jan 1997 | A |
5607424 | Tropiano | Mar 1997 | A |
5609635 | Michelson | Mar 1997 | A |
5609636 | Kohrs et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5645084 | McKay | Jul 1997 | A |
5645598 | Brosnahan, III | Jul 1997 | A |
5658337 | Kohrs et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5669909 | Zdeblick et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5683463 | Godefroy et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5702449 | McKay | Dec 1997 | A |
5741253 | Michelson | Apr 1998 | A |
5766252 | Henry et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772661 | Michelson | Jun 1998 | A |
5776199 | Michelson | Jul 1998 | A |
5782919 | Zdeblick et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
D397439 | Koros et al. | Aug 1998 | S |
5800547 | Schäfer et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800550 | Sertich | Sep 1998 | A |
5814084 | Grivas et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5846484 | Scarborough et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855227 | Stucchi | Jan 1999 | A |
5860973 | Michelson | Jan 1999 | A |
5861041 | Tienboon | Jan 1999 | A |
5865845 | Thalgott | Feb 1999 | A |
5888222 | Coates et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888226 | Rogozinski | Mar 1999 | A |
5888227 | Cottle | Mar 1999 | A |
5899939 | Boyce et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904719 | Errico et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906635 | Maniglia | May 1999 | A |
5972368 | McKay | Oct 1999 | A |
5989289 | Coates et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6033438 | Bianchi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6034295 | Rehberg et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6037519 | McKay | Mar 2000 | A |
6039762 | McKay | Mar 2000 | A |
D425989 | Michelson | May 2000 | S |
6080155 | Michelson | Jun 2000 | A |
6083228 | Michelson | Jul 2000 | A |
6111164 | Rainey et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113638 | Williams et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120503 | Michelson | Sep 2000 | A |
6136031 | Middleton | Oct 2000 | A |
6139550 | Michelson | Oct 2000 | A |
6143032 | Schafer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159214 | Michelson | Dec 2000 | A |
6165219 | Kohrs et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6174311 | Branch et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179875 | Von Strempel | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200347 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206923 | Boyd et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210412 | Michelson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224607 | Michelson | May 2001 | B1 |
6224631 | Kohrs | May 2001 | B1 |
6231610 | Geisler | May 2001 | B1 |
6235034 | Bray | May 2001 | B1 |
6241770 | Michelson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6241771 | Gresser | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245108 | Biscup | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258125 | Paul et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261586 | McKay | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270528 | McKay | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277149 | Boyle et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6294041 | Boyce et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294187 | Boyce et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6342074 | Simpson | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348071 | Steffee et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350283 | Michelson | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6371988 | Pafford et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383221 | Scarborough et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391058 | Kuslich et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395031 | Foley et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398811 | McKay | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402785 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409765 | Bianchi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423095 | Van Hoeck et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425108 | Chiang | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6468311 | Boyd et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6471724 | Zdeblick et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6482233 | Aebi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482584 | Mills et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485517 | Michelson | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6511509 | Ford et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6530955 | Boyle et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6554863 | Paul et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6562072 | Fuss et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6562073 | Foley | May 2003 | B2 |
6572654 | Santilli | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6575981 | Boyd et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6629998 | Lin | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635086 | Lin | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6666890 | Michelson | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6706067 | Shimp et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6749636 | Michelson | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6808585 | Boyce et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6827740 | Michelson | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6855168 | Crozet | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6890355 | Michelson | May 2005 | B2 |
6923810 | Michelson | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6984245 | McGahan et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6989031 | Michelson | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7022137 | Michelson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7048762 | Sander et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7087082 | Paul et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7115146 | Boyer | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7156875 | Michelson | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7387643 | Michelson | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7435262 | Michelson | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7455692 | Michelson | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7462195 | Michelson | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7479160 | Branch et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7534254 | Michelson | May 2009 | B1 |
7534265 | Boyd et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7540882 | Michelson | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7611536 | Michelson | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7637950 | Baccelli et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637951 | Michelson | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637954 | Michelson | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7935149 | Michelson | May 2011 | B2 |
20010010020 | Michelson | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010018614 | Bianchi | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010031254 | Bianchi et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020116064 | Middleton | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116065 | Jackson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020193881 | Shapiro et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030083748 | Lee et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040064185 | Michelson | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040210313 | Michelson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050216089 | Michelson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060235519 | Michelson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20090105821 | Michelson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090270991 | Michelson | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100030333 | Michelson | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100145463 | Michelson | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110264219 | Rouben | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20130096687 | Michelson | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
35 05 567 | May 1986 | DE |
0 077 159 | Apr 1983 | EP |
0 179 695 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0 260 044 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0 307 241 | Mar 1989 | EP |
0 392 076 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0 577 179 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0 599 419 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0 627 204 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0 637 440 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0 834 295 | Apr 1998 | EP |
2 724 312 | Mar 1993 | FR |
2 703 580 | Oct 1994 | FR |
2 727 003 | May 1996 | FR |
2 761 879 | Oct 1998 | FR |
57-029348 | Feb 1982 | JP |
61-122859 | Jun 1986 | JP |
62-155846 | Jul 1987 | JP |
5-269160 | Oct 1993 | JP |
8-266563 | Oct 1996 | JP |
WO 9214423 | Sep 1992 | WO |
WO 9301771 | Feb 1993 | WO |
WO 9508306 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 9508964 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 9622747 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 9640020 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9723174 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9723175 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9844877 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9848738 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9855052 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9963891 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0007527 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0074608 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0128465 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0168005 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0149220 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0162191 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0168004 | Sep 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 60/115,388, filed Jan. 11, 1999; 80 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/118,793, filed Feb. 4, 1999; 41 pages. |
Muschler, George F., et al.; “The Biology of Spinal Fusion;” Spinal Fusion, Science and Technique, Colter and Colter; Dec. 1989; 2 cover pages and pp. 9-21. |
Zindrick, Michael R., et al.; “Lumbar Spine Fusion: Different Types and Indications;” The Lumbar Spine, vol. 1, Second Edition; 1996; 2 cover pages and pp. 588-593. |
Crock, H.V.; Practice of Spinal Surgery; Springer-Verlag/Wien, New York (1983). |
DeBowes, R.M., et al.; “Study of Bovine . . . Steel Baskets;” Transactions of the 29th Annual Meeting; Orthopaedic Research Society, vol. 8; Mar. 8-10, 1983; cover page and p. 407. |
Otero-Vich, Jose M.; “Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion with Threaded Cylindrical Bone;” J. Neurosurg, vol. 63; Nov. 1985; 2 cover pages and pp. 750-753. |
Butts, M.K., et al.; “Biomechanical Analysis of a New Method for Spinal Interbody Fixation;” 1987 Symposium, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, “Advances in Bioengineering”, Boston, MA; Dec. 13-18, 1987; 7 pages. |
Crawley, Gregory R., et al.; “A Modified Cloward's Technique for Arthrodesis of the Normal Metacarpophalangeal Joint in the Horse:” Veterinary Surgery, vol. 17, No. 3; 1988; pp. 117-127. |
Bagby, G.W.; Arthrodesis by the Distraction-Compression Method Using a Stainless Steel Implant; Orthopedics, vol. II, No. 6, pp. 931-934 (Jun. 1987). |
Itoman, Moritoshi, et al.; “Banked Bone Grafting for Bone Defect Repair—Clinical Evaluation of Bone Union and Graft Incorporation;” J. Jpn. Orthop. Assoc., vol. 62; 1988; pp. 461-469. |
Schmitz, H.J., et al.; “Performance of Alloplastic Materials and Design of an Artificial Disc;” The Artificial Disc; 1991; cover page and pp. 23-34. |
Thieme; Fusion of the Lumbar Spine; “Anterior Monosegmental Fusion L5-S1;” Atlas of Spinal Operations; 1993; cover page and pp. 270-274. |
White, et al.; Lumbar Spine Surgery, Techniques and Complications; History of Lumbar Spine Surgery; 1994; cover page and pp. 11-15, 27, 30, 35-45, 265-268. |
European Opposition Document, Nov. 27, 1995—Opposing EP Patent No. 425 542 B1 Anterior Spinal Fusion Implant; 5 pages. |
Laparoscopic Bone Dowel Surgical Technique; Brochure of Sofamor Danek; 1995; 17 pages. |
Laparoscopic Bone Dowel Instruments; Brochure of Sofamor Danek; 1995; 2 pages. |
Brochure of University of Florida Tissue Bank; MD-I and MD-II Custom Machine Cortical Dowels; Circa 1996; 2 pages. |
Brochure of University of Florida Tissue Bank; MD-III Threaded Cortical Dowel; Circa 1996; 4 pages. |
Glazer, P.A., et al.; Biomechanical Analysis of Multilevel Fixation Methods in the Lumbar Spine; Spine, vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 171-182 (1997). |
Ray, C.D.; Spinal Interbody Fusions: A Review, Featuring New Generation Techniques; Neurosurgery Quarterly, 7(2):135-156 (1997). |
A picture of a Medtronic, Sofamor Danek Display; titled “Evolving With Your Needs;” Apr. 6, 2000; 1 page. |
RTI Precision Machined Allograft: The Surgeon's Choice, Brochure by Regeneration Technologies, Inc. (2000). |
Puros ALIF Bone Graft, Brochure by Sulzer Spine-Tech (2001). |
What's New at . . . Spine-Tech: Allograft and Thoracolumbar, Brochure Spine-Tech (Circa 2001). |
New IBS Allograft, The C-TLIF Approach, Brochure of OrthoDevelopment (2002). |
Introducing graftech Allografts, Webpage by Osteotech (Circa Jan. 2002). |
RTI Tissue Services, Spinal Allograft, Webpage of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. (2002). |
International Search Report mailed Aug. 14, 2000 from corresponding International PCT Application No. PCT/US00/12363, filed May 5, 2000; 1 page. |
International Search Report mailed on Aug. 15, 2001, of corresponding International Application No. PCT/US01/11723, filed Apr. 19, 2001; 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110208313 A1 | Aug 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60281187 | Apr 2001 | US | |
60281124 | Apr 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12455415 | Jun 2009 | US |
Child | 13100143 | US | |
Parent | 11089057 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 12455415 | US | |
Parent | 10112747 | Apr 2002 | US |
Child | 11089057 | US |