Spinal fusion implant with bone screws and a bone screw lock

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8926703
  • Patent Number
    8,926,703
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 3, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 6, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
An interbody spinal fusion implant made of a material other than bone adapted for placement across an intervertebral space formed across the height of a disc space between two adjacent vertebral bodies. The implant has a leading end that is curved to form a portion of a circle from side to side, sides that are at least in part straight, and a trailing end with a bone screw receiving hole for receiving at least one bone screw to engage the vertebral bodies.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to interbody spinal implants preferably adapted for placement into an implantation space created across the height of a disc space between two adjacent vertebral bodies for the purpose of correcting spinal disease at that interspace. The spinal implants are made of an implant material that is other than bone and may or may not be resorbable. The implants are adapted such that fusion occurs at least in part through the implants.


DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART

Implants for placement between adjacent vertebral bodies in the spine come in a variety of shapes and sizes and are made of a variety of materials. Such implants for use in human spinal surgery include implants made of selected inert materials, such as titanium, that have a structure designed to promote fusion of the adjacent vertebral bodies by allowing bone to grow through the implant to thereby fuse the adjacent vertebral bodies.


The spinal disc that resides between adjacent vertebral bodies maintains the spacing between those vertebral bodies and, in a healthy spine, allows for relative motion between the vertebrae. At the time of surgery, for example in the instance where fusion is intended to occur between adjacent vertebral bodies of a patient's spine, the surgeon typically prepares an opening at the site of the intended fusion by removing some or all of the disc material that exists between the adjacent vertebral bodies to be fused. Because the outermost layers of bone of the vertebral end plate are relatively inert to new bone growth, the surgeon must work on the end plate to remove at least the outermost cell layers of bone to gain access to the blood-rich, vascular bone tissue within the vertebral body. In this manner, the vertebrae are prepared in a way that encourages new bone to grow into or through an implant that is placed between the vertebral bodies.


Present methods of forming this space between adjacent vertebral bodies generally include the use of one or more of the following: hand held biting and grasping instruments known as rongeurs; drills and drill guides; rotating burrs driven by a motor; osteotomes and chisels, and a double wheel cutter or vertebral interspace preparation device. In particular, the double wheel cutter or vertebral interspace preparation device, as disclosed by Michelson in WO 99/63891, incorporated herein by reference, is adapted for linear insertion, i.e., insertion along a single axis, and without the need to substantially move the device from side to side within the disc space along a second axis. In such a preferred embodiment, the device has at its working end an abrading element having a width generally corresponding to the width of the implant to be implanted.


There is a desire to improve congruity at the interfaces of the implant to the adjacent vertebral bodies, and to achieve stability of the implant. Therefore it is advantageous for the contour of the implants to closely match the implantation space formed between and at least in part into the adjacent vertebral bodies to allow a more uniform load transfer across the implant between the vertebral bodies.


As it is desirable to take advantage of all these benefits, there exists a need for an improved interbody spinal fusion implant made of a material other than bone having a configuration that provides for an improved congruity of the implant to the vertebral bodies and improved implant stability.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the purposes of the present invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, an artificial interbody spinal fusion implant made of a material other than bone is provided for insertion at least in part into an implantation space formed across the height of a disc space between adjacent vertebral bodies of a human spine. The implant includes a leading end for insertion first into the disc space and a trailing end opposite the leading end. The implant has a length from the leading end to the trailing end. The leading end is configured in the shape of approximately one half of a circle from side to side. The implant also includes opposed upper and lower portions between the leading and trailing ends that are adapted to be placed within the disc space to contact and support the adjacent vertebral bodies. The upper and lower portions are non-arcuate along at least a portion of the length of the implant. The upper and lower portions include at least one opening in communication with one another and adapted to hold bone growth promoting material for permitting for the growth of bone from vertebral body to vertebral body through the implant. The implant also includes opposite sides between the upper portion and lower portion, and between the leading and trailing ends. At least one of the opposite sides is at least in part straight along at least a portion of the length of the implant.


In accordance with the purposes of the present invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, an interbody spinal fusion implant made of a material other than bone is provided for insertion at least in part into an implantation space formed across the height of a disc space between adjacent vertebral bodies of a human spine. The implant includes a leading end for insertion first into the disc space and a trailing end opposite the leading end. The implant has a length from the leading end to the trailing end. The leading end is configured from side to side in the shape of approximately one half of a first circle. The trailing end has a radius of curvature of a second circle from side to side. The second circle has a radius greater than the radius of the first circle. The implant also includes opposed upper and lower portions between the leading and trailing ends that are adapted to be placed within the disc space to contact and support the adjacent vertebral bodies. The upper and lower portions include at least one opening in communication with one another and adapted to hold bone growth promoting material for permitting for the growth of bone from vertebral body to vertebral body through the implant. The implant has a maximum width that is greater than one-half of the width of the adjacent vertebral: bodies into which the implant is adapted to be inserted.


Additional objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a vertebral body in the lumbar spine with an implantation space formed to receive a spinal implant having a radius of curvature at the leading end that is less than the radius of curvature of the trailing end of the anterior aspect of the vertebral body between the sides of the implantation space.



FIG. 2 is a side elevation view of two adjacent vertebral bodies in the lumbar spine with the implantation space of FIG. 1 formed across the height of the spinal disc and into the adjacent vertebral bodies.



FIG. 3 is a side perspective view of the implantation space of FIG. 1.



FIG. 4 is a top plan view of a vertebral body in the cervical spine with an implantation space formed to receive a spinal implant having a radius of curvature at the leading end that is less than the radius of curvature of the trailing end of the anterior aspect of the vertebral body.



FIG. 5 is a side elevation view of two adjacent vertebral bodies in the cervical spine with the implantation space of FIG. 4 formed across the height of the spinal disc and into the adjacent vertebral bodies.



FIG. 6 is a side perspective view of the implantation space of FIG. 4.



FIG. 7 is a top plan view of a vertebral body in the lumbar spine and a preferred embodiment of an implant in accordance with the present invention installed into the implantation space of FIG. 1.



FIG. 8 is a side elevation view of two adjacent vertebral bodies with the implant of FIG. 7 installed into the implantation space of FIG. 1 formed across the height of the spinal disc and into the adjacent vertebral bodies.



FIG. 9 is a top plan view of the implant of FIG. 7.



FIG. 10 is a side elevation view of the implant of FIG. 7.



FIG. 11 is a leading end view of the implant of FIG. 7.



FIG. 12 is a trailing end view of the implant of FIG. 7.



FIG. 13 is a top plan view of another preferred embodiment of an implant in accordance with the present invention for use in the implantation space of FIG. 4.



FIG. 14 is a rear perspective view of another preferred embodiment of an implant in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention having two members that are preferably mirror images of one another.



FIG. 15 is a top plan view of one of the members of the implant of FIG. 14.



FIG. 16 is an interior side elevation view of one of the members of the implant of FIG. 14.



FIG. 17 is an exterior side elevation view of one of the members of the implant of FIG. 14.



FIG. 18 is a leading end view of one of the members of the implant of FIG. 14.



FIG. 19 is a trailing end view of one of the members of the implant of FIG. 14.



FIG. 20 is a top plan view of another preferred embodiment of an implant in accordance with the present invention with bone engaging screws.



FIG. 21 is a side elevation view of the implant of FIG. 20.



FIG. 22 is a leading end view of the implant of FIG. 20.



FIG. 23 is a trailing end view of the implant of FIG. 20 with the bone engaging screws and lock installed.



FIG. 24 is a trailing end view of the implant of FIG. 23 without the bone engaging screws and lock installed.



FIG. 25 is a partial cross sectional side view of a preferred embodiment of a bone screw lock in accordance with the present invention for use with the implant of FIG. 20.



FIG. 26 is a cross sectional side view of another preferred embodiment of a bone screw lock in accordance with the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The following description is intended to be representative only and not limiting and many variations can be anticipated according to these teachings, which are included within the scope of this inventive teaching. Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of this invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.



FIGS. 1-3 show an implantation space 50 formed across the height of the space occupied by a spinal disc D and into vertebral bodies V in the lumbar spine. Implantation space 50 is preferably formed with the apparatus and method disclosed by Michelson in U.S. Pat. No. 6,083,228, and WO 99/63891, the disclosures of which are both incorporated herein by reference. The instruments and method are not the subject matter of this application. It is understood that the preparation of the implantation space shown therein are a preferred instrument and method of preparing the implantation spaces and that any method and instrumentation suitable for the purpose may be utilized to prepare the desired implantation space adapted to receive the implants of the present invention.


Implantation space 50 is preferably formed in the endplate region ER in the subchondral bone of the vertebral body V. Implantation space 50 preferably is formed to have a leading edge 52 with a shape from side to side of approximately one-half of a first circle A. The trailing portion 54 of implantation space 50 preferably includes at least a portion of the anterior aspect of the vertebral body having a radius of curvature of a second circle B from side to side. Preferably the radius of circle A is less than the radius of circle B. Implantation space 50 may further include side edges 56, 58. Side edges 56, 58 preferably include at least a straight portion, may be parallel to one another along lines P and form a curved transition with leading edge 52.



FIGS. 4-6 show an implantation space 60 formed across the height of the space occupied by a spinal disc D and into vertebral bodies V in the cervical spine. Implantation space 60 preferably is formed to have a leading edge 62 with a shape from side to side of approximately one half of a first circle A. The trailing portion of implantation space 60 preferably includes at least a portion of the anterior aspect of the vertebral body having a radius of curvature of a second circle C from side to side. Preferably the radius of circle A is less than the radius of circle C. Implantation space 60, however, preferably does not have straight side edges like implantation space 50 because the anterior to posterior depth of cervical vertebral bodies is less than the anterior to posterior depth of lumbar vertebral bodies. Thus, the radius of circle C is smaller in the cervical spine than the radius of circle B in the lumbar spine.



FIGS. 7-12 show an implant 100 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Implant 100 has a leading end 102 for insertion first into the disc space between two adjacent vertebral bodies and a trailing end 104 opposite leading end 102, and opposite sides 110, 112 therebetween. Leading end 102 is preferably configured to match the contour of leading edge 52 of implantation space 50 and trailing end 104 is preferably configured to conform to the contour of the anterior aspect of the vertebral body at trailing portion 54 of implantation space 50. Sides 110, 112 are generally planar and preferably correspond to the configuration of side edges 56, 58 of implantation space 50.


In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, leading end 102, trailing end 104, and opposite sides 110, 112 may have various configurations. Leading end 102 is preferably is in the shape of approximately half a first circle from side to side. Where the implantation space is prepared into the vertebral bodies to have a lip or ridge that is at least in part curved, leading end 102 may be adapted to abut at least that portion of the implantation space.


One or both of sides 110, 112 may also be formed to be at least in part oriented generally parallel to the mid-longitudinal axis of implant 100 and/or to each other. One or both of sides 110, 112 may include at least one opening 119 to permit for the growth of bone therethrough and into implant 100, though the invention is not so limited. Further, leading end 102 may be tapered to facilitate insertion of implant 100 between the two adjacent vertebral bodies.


Trailing end 104 preferably forms an arc of a second circle from side to side having a radius greater than the radius of the first circle associated with leading end 102. Preferably, at least a portion of trailing end 104 is adapted to conform to at least a portion of the peripheral contour of the anterior aspect of the vertebral bodies adjacent the disc space into which the implant is adapted to be inserted, though the invention is not so limited.



FIG. 12 shows that implant 100 preferably has a driver opening 116 at trailing end 104 for cooperatively engaging an instrument for installing implant 100 into the implantation space. Driver opening 116 is preferably configured for threaded engagement with an insertion instrument.



FIGS. 8, 10, and 11 show at least a portion of upper and lower surfaces 106, 108 in an angular relationship to each other from trailing end 104 to leading end 102 for allowing for angulation of the adjacent vertebral bodies relative to each other. Preferably, upper and lower surfaces 106, 108 are non-arcuate in a direction along the mid-longitudinal axis of implant 100. implant 100 preferably has a maximum height that is less than the maximum width of the implant.


As shown in FIG. 9, upper and lower surfaces 106, 108 preferably have at least one opening 114 passing therethrough between leading and trailing ends 102, 104, respectively, and opposite sides 110, 112. Openings 114 are preferably adapted to hold bone growth promoting material to permit for the growth of bone from vertebral body to vertebral body through openings 114 and through implant 100. Upper and lower surfaces 106, 108 may also be porous and may include a bone ingrowth surface.


As shown in FIG. 9, the implants described herein may include a bone-engaging surface 118 such as knurling for example. Bone engaging surface 118 is configured to engage the bone of the adjacent vertebral bodies to maintain implant 100 within the adjacent vertebral bodies after implantation. Other preferred embodiments of bone-engaging surfaces may include the surfaces of the implant being roughened, ratcheted, splined, or may include at least one protrusion to penetrably engage the bone of the vertebral bodies. By way of example only, the implants of the present invention may include the surface configuration taught by Michelson in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/457,228, entitled “Spinal Implant Surface Configuration,” the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.


Bone for use as the base material used to form the implant of the preferred embodiment is specifically excluded for the purpose of this application. Where the implants are for spinal fusion, it is appreciated that they may be adapted to receive fusion promoting substances and/or materials within them such as, but not limited to cancellous bone, bone derived products, or others. In a preferred embodiment, the material of the implant is formed of material other than bone, such as metal including, but not limited to, titanium and its alloys, ASTM material, cobalt chrome, or tantalum, ceramic, various surgical grade plastics, plastic composites, carbon fiber composites, coral, and can include artificial materials which are at least in part bioresorbable.


Upper and lower surfaces that are angled relative to each other, when subsequently implanted into the spine, position the adjacent vertebral bodies in angular relationship to each other to restore the natural curvature of the spine, such as lordosis for example.


The implant may have a selected shape suitable for the intended purpose. For example only, the leading end may be in the shape of approximately one half of a circle from side to side. The sides may be at least in part straight. The trailing end may have any desired shape suitable for the intended purpose and may preferably conform to the anatomical contour of the adjacent vertebral bodies between which the implant is adapted to be inserted. Implant 100 preferably has a length greater than one-half the depth of the vertebral bodies adjacent the disc space into which the implant is adapted to be inserted as measured between the anterior and posterior aspects of the vertebral bodies. Implant 100 also preferably has a maximum width that is greater than one-half the width of the adjacent vertebral bodies into which the implant is adapted to be inserted.



FIG. 13 shows another preferred embodiment of the present invention for use in the cervical spine generally referred to by the numeral 200. Implant 200 is preferably configured to conform to the shape of implantation space 60 formed in the endplates of adjacent cervical vertebral bodies with instrumentation and methods similar to those used in association with the lumbar spine but modified for use in the cervical spine. Implant 200 may, for example, have a leading end 202 formed to have a shape of approximately one-half a first circle from side to side. Trailing end 204 preferably may be formed as an arc of a second circle from side to side that intersects the curvature of leading end 202 from side to side. The radius of the second circle associated with trailing end 204 is preferably greater that the radius of the first circle associated with leading end 202.



FIGS. 14-19 show an implant 300 in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention adapted for use from the anterior approach to the spine. FIG. 14 shows a rear perspective view of implant 300. Implant 300 includes at least two members 300′, 300″ that are adapted to be placed side by side with one another. Member 300′ is preferably, but need not be a mirror image of member 300″. The description of member 300′ is equally applicable to member 300″. Member 300′ has a leading portion 302′ for insertion first into the disc space between two adjacent vertebral bodies and a trailing portion 304′ opposite leading portion 302′. Member 300′ has a top 306′, a bottom 308′, an interior side 310′, and an exterior facing side 312′ opposite interior facing side 310′. As used herein, the phrase “interior side” describes the side of the member adapted to be orientated toward the interior side of another member when a pair of members are inserted side by side into the disc space.


Leading portions 302′, 302″ of each member 300′, 300″, respectively, form leading end 302 of implant 300 when the members are placed side by side to one another. Leading end 302 of implant 300 is preferably configured in the shape of one-half a first circle from side to side. Trailing end 304, composed of trailing portions 304′, 304″ when members 300′, 300″ are placed side by side to one another, may, but need not be formed as an arc of a second circle side to side having a radius greater than a radius of the first circle associated with leading end 302 of implant 300.


Member 300′ is placed side by side with member 300″ so that a portion of interior side 310′ of each member are adjacent one another. Top 306′ and bottom 308′ preferably have at least one opening 314′ passing therethrough between leading and trailing portions 302′, 304′, respectively, and sides 310′, 312′. Openings 314′ are adapted to hold bone growth promoting material to permit for the growth of bone from vertebral body to vertebral body through openings 314. Interior side 310′ may also include at least one opening 314′ passing therethrough configured to permit bone growth between and into adjacent members 300′, 300″. Member 300′ preferably has a maximum width W that is less than approximately one-half the width of the adjacent vertebral bodies into which the member is adapted to be inserted. Also, the combined width of both members 300′, 300″ is preferably greater than one-half the width of the adjacent vertebral bodies into which the members are adapted to be inserted.


Members 300′, 300″ provide the added advantage in that each member can be inserted through a smaller space than a single larger implant, to achieve the same effect as the larger implant.


In another preferred embodiment the implant of the present invention may be adapted for use from an anterior approach to the spine and have a maximum width between its sides that is less than one-half of the width of the adjacent vertebral bodies into which the implant is adapted to be inserted. The implant may have a leading end that is shaped as approximately one-half a first circle. The implant may also have a trailing end that forms an arc of a second circle having a radius that is substantially greater than the radius of the first circle associated with the leading end.


In another preferred embodiment, the implant of the present invention may be adapted for use from an anterior approach to the spine and have preferably both the leading and trailing ends in the shape of approximately one half of a circle side to side.


In another preferred embodiment the implant of the present invention may be adapted for use from a posterior approach to the spine and have a trailing end that is preferably at least in part straight from side to side.



FIGS. 20-26 show an implant 400 in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. Implant 400 is similar to implant 100 and has a leading end 402 in the shape of approximately one-half a first circle A and a trailing end 404 formed as an arc of a second circle C. Implant 400 preferably includes straight portions 411, 413 along at least a portion of sides 410, 412, respectively, that are preferably parallel to each other along lines P. Implant 400 also preferably includes a curved transition from each straight portion 411, 413 of sides 410, 412, respectively, to trailing end 404 to form rounded portions 415, 417, respectively. Rounded portion 415, 417 may be an arc of a third circle E that preferably has a radius less than the radii of circle A associated with leading end 402 and/or circle C associated with trailing end 404.


In a preferred embodiment, implant 400 may be adapted to receive through bone screw receiving holes 420 at trailing end 404 at least a pair of opposed appropriately sized bone screws 422. Bone engaging screws 422 may be aligned or offset from each other. At least one screw 422 engages each of the vertebral bodies adjacent a disc space to be fused and into which implant 400 is implanted. A purpose of the bone screws is to rigidly secure the implant within the vertebral segment. A further purpose is to pull each of the adjacent vertebral bodies toward the implant and towards each other. Trailing end 404 of implant 400 preferably includes a recess 424 having bone screw receiving holes 420 therein and an opening 426 configured to cooperatively receive a locking cap 428 adapted to lock at least one bone screw 422 to implant 400.


As shown in FIG. 25, implant 400 is preferably adapted to receive a lock 428 at trailing end 404 for securing bone engaging screws 422 therein and preventing the screws from backing out. Locking cap 428 has a top 430, a stem 432, and a tool engagement area 434. In use, locking cap cooperatively engages trailing end 404 of implant 400 at opening 426 to lock at least one bone screw to implant 400. If desired, locking cap 428 may include a thread on stem 432 to allow locking cap 428 to rotationally engage implant 400.



FIG. 26 shows another preferred embodiment of a locking cap, generally referred to by the numeral 436. Locking cap 436 includes a top 438 having a thread 440 at its outer perimeter that is adapted to cooperatively engage a corresponding threaded recess in the implant.


The implant, bone screws, and/or locks can be made of a bioresorbable material, including but not limited to plastics and composite plastics. Suitable plastics may include those comprising lactides, galactides, glycolide, capronlactone, trimethylene carbonate, or dioxanone in various polymers, and/or combinations thereof.


By way of example only and not limitation, for use in the lumbar spine, the implants of the present invention may have a depth of approximately, 28-36 mm, a width of approximately, 30-38 mm, and a height (max) of approximately 8-20 mm. The radius of curvature of the leading end may be approximately 15-19 mm and the radius of curvature of the trailing end may be approximately 20-30 mm.


In any of the embodiments of the present invention, the implant may include, be made of, treated, coated, filled, used in combination with, or have a hollow or opening for containing artificial or naturally occurring materials and/or substances suitable for implantation in the human spine. These materials and/or substances include any source of osteogenesis, bone growth promoting materials, bone, bone derived substances or products, demineralized bone matrix, mineralizing proteins, ossifying proteins, bone morphogenetic proteins, hydroxyapatite, genes coding for the production of bone, and bone including, but not limited to, cortical bone. The implant can include at least in part of materials that are bioabsorbable and/or resorbable in the body such as bone and/or bone growth promoting materials. The implant of the present invention can be formed of a porous material or can be formed of a material that intrinsically participates in the growth of bone from one of adjacent vertebral bodies to the other of adjacent vertebral bodies. Where such implants are for posterior implantation, the trailing ends of such implants may be treated with, coated with, or used in combination with chemical substances to inhibit scar tissue formation in the spinal canal. The implant of the present invention may be modified, or used in combination with materials to make it antibacterial, such as, but not limited to, electroplating or plasma spraying with silver ions or other substance. At least a portion of the implant may be treated to promote bone ingrowth between the implant and the adjacent vertebral bodies. The implant of the present invention may be used in combination with a spinal fixation implant such as any object, regardless of material, that can be inserted into any portion of the spine, such as but not limited to interbody spinal implants, structural bone grafts, mesh, cages, spacers, staples, bone screws, plates, rods, tethers of synthetic cords or wires, or other spinal fixation hardware


While the shapes of the various aspects of the implant have been described precisely, the scope of the present invention is not so limited and it is readily anticipated that the contours may be interrupted by minor irregularities such as for example only for the purpose of engaging the bone, encouraging the ingrowth or through growth of bone.


While specific innovative features were presented in reference to specific examples, they are just examples, and it should be understood that various combinations of these innovative features beyond those specifically shown are taught such that they may now be easily alternatively combined and are hereby anticipated and claimed.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus comprising: an interbody spinal fusion implant for insertion at least in part into an implantation space formed across the height of a disc space between adjacent vertebrae of a human spine, said implant comprising: a leading end for insertion first into the disc space and a trailing end opposite said leading end, said implant having a mid-longitudinal axis extending through said leading end and said trailing end, said implant having a length from said leading end to said trailing end, the length of said implant being parallel to the mid-longitudinal axis;opposed upper and lower exterior surfaces between said leading and trailing ends to contact and support the adjacent vertebrae, said upper and lower exterior surfaces defining a maximum height of said implant, the maximum height extending between said upper and lower exterior surfaces in a first plane perpendicular to the mid-longitudinal axis, said upper and lower exterior surfaces of said implant including at least one opening in communication with one another for permitting for the growth of bone from vertebra to vertebra through said implant, said upper and lower exterior surfaces of said implant including at least one bone engaging projection for engaging the adjacent vertebrae;opposite sides between said upper exterior surface and said lower exterior surface, and between said leading and trailing ends, said opposite sides defining a maximum width of said implant being greater than the maximum height of said implant, the maximum width extending between said opposite sides in a second plane perpendicular to the first plane and parallel to the mid-longitudinal axis, each of said opposite sides having a straight portion in a direction from said leading end to said trailing end along the length of said implant, the straight portions of said opposite sides being parallel to one another, said leading end being at least in part curved in a third plane parallel to the second plane and having a first radius of curvature, a majority of said trailing end being curved between said opposite sides in the third plane and having a second radius of curvature greater than said first radius of curvature;said trailing end having a recess including upper and lower angled interior surfaces converging in a direction toward said leading end, said upper and lower angled interior surfaces including respective upper and lower bone screw receiving holes passing through said upper and lower angled interior surfaces, said recess including a threaded opening spaced apart from said bone screw receiving holes;a plurality of bone screws configured to be inserted into said bone screw receiving holes; anda bone screw lock for locking said plurality of bone screws, said bone screw lock having a top and a threaded portion, said top and said threaded portion being part of unitary structure, said thread portion adapted to threadably engage said threaded opening in said recess of said trailing end, said top being configured to cover at least a portion of each of said bone screws to prevent said bone screws from backing out from said bone screw receiving holes.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said threaded opening has a central longitudinal axis coaxial with the mid-longitudinal axis of said implant.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said threaded opening has a maximum diameter less than a maximum diameter of at least one of said bone screw receiving holes.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said at least one opening in said upper and lower exterior surfaces has a maximum dimension greater than one half the length of said implant.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said top of said lock is circular.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said top of said lock has a maximum diameter approximately equal to the maximum height of said implant.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said top of said lock includes an opening configured to receive at least a portion of a tool.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said top of said lock has a maximum diameter greater than a maximum diameter of said threaded portion.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said top of said lock has a maximum diameter greater than a maximum diameter of at least one of said bone screw receiving holes.
  • 10. An apparatus comprising: an interbody spinal implant for insertion at least in part into an implantation space formed across the height of a disc space between adjacent vertebrae of a human spine, said implant comprising: a leading end for insertion first into the disc space and a trailing end opposite said leading end, said implant having a mid-longitudinal axis extending through said leading end and said trailing end, said implant having a length from said leading end to said trailing end, the length of said implant being parallel to the mid-longitudinal axis;opposed upper and lower exterior surfaces between said leading and trailing ends to contact and support the adjacent vertebrae, said upper and lower exterior surfaces defining a maximum height of said implant, the maximum height extending between said upper and lower exterior surfaces in a first plane perpendicular to the mid-longitudinal axis;opposite sides between said upper exterior surface and said lower exterior surface, and between said leading and trailing ends, said opposite sides defining a maximum width of said implant being greater than the maximum height of said implant, the maximum width extending between said opposite sides in a second plane perpendicular to the first plane and parallel to the mid-longitudinal axis, said leading end being at least in part curved in a third plane parallel to the second plane and having a first radius of curvature, a majority of said trailing end being curved between said opposite sides in the third plane and having a second radius of curvature greater than said first radius of curvature;said trailing end having a recess including upper and lower angled interior surfaces converging in a direction toward said leading end, said upper and lower angled interior surfaces including respective upper and lower bone screw receiving holes passing through said upper and lower angled interior surfaces, said recess including a threaded opening spaced apart from said bone screw receiving holes;a plurality of bone screws configured to be inserted into said bone screw receiving holes, each of said bone screws having a leading end and a trailing end; anda bone screw lock for locking said plurality of bone screws, said bone screw lock including a shaft portion configured to cooperatively engage said recess of said trailing end and a top configured to substantially cover the entirety of said trailing end of each of said bone screws to prevent said bone screws from backing out from said bone screw receiving holes, said shaft portion and said top being part of a unitary structure.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein said threaded opening has a central longitudinal axis coaxial with the mid-longitudinal axis of said implant.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein said threaded opening has a maximum diameter less than a maximum diameter of at least one of said bone screw receiving holes.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein said at least one opening in said upper and lower exterior surfaces has a maximum dimension greater than one half the length of said implant.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein said lock includes an opening configured to receive at least a portion of a tool.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein said top has a maximum diameter greater than a maximum diameter of said shaft portion.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein said top of said lock is circular.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the maximum diameter of said top is approximately equal to the maximum height of said implant.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the maximum diameter of said top is greater than a maximum diameter of at least one of said bone screw receiving holes.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/455,415, filed Jun. 2, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,935,149; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/089,057, filed Mar. 24, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,540,882; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/112,747, filed Apr. 2, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,890,355; which claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/281,187, filed Apr. 3, 2001, and Provisional Application No. 60/281,124, filed Apr. 2, 2001; all of which are incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (195)
Number Name Date Kind
2677369 Knowles May 1954 A
3426364 Lumb Feb 1969 A
3848601 Ma et al. Nov 1974 A
3867728 Stubstad et al. Feb 1975 A
3875595 Froning Apr 1975 A
3905047 Long Sep 1975 A
D245259 Shen Aug 1977 S
4070514 Eatherly Jan 1978 A
4309777 Patil Jan 1982 A
4349921 Kuntz Sep 1982 A
4501269 Bagby Feb 1985 A
RE31865 Roux Apr 1985 E
4599086 Doty Jul 1986 A
4636217 Ogilvie et al. Jan 1987 A
4714469 Kenna Dec 1987 A
4743256 Brantigan May 1988 A
4759766 Buettner-Janz et al. Jul 1988 A
4759769 Hedman et al. Jul 1988 A
4820305 Harms et al. Apr 1989 A
4834757 Brantigan May 1989 A
4863476 Shepperd Sep 1989 A
4863477 Monson Sep 1989 A
4877020 Vich Oct 1989 A
4878915 Brantigan Nov 1989 A
4904261 Dove et al. Feb 1990 A
4911718 Lee et al. Mar 1990 A
4936848 Bagby Jun 1990 A
4955908 Frey et al. Sep 1990 A
4961740 Ray et al. Oct 1990 A
5015247 Michelson May 1991 A
5015255 Kuslich May 1991 A
5026373 Ray et al. Jun 1991 A
5047055 Bao Sep 1991 A
5055104 Ray Oct 1991 A
5059193 Kuslich Oct 1991 A
5062845 Kuslich et al. Nov 1991 A
5071437 Steffee Dec 1991 A
5122130 Keller Jun 1992 A
5123926 Pisharodi Jun 1992 A
5171278 Pisharodi Dec 1992 A
5192327 Brantigan Mar 1993 A
5246458 Graham Sep 1993 A
5258031 Salib et al. Nov 1993 A
5290312 Kojimoto et al. Mar 1994 A
5306308 Gross et al. Apr 1994 A
5306309 Wagner et al. Apr 1994 A
5370697 Baumgartner Dec 1994 A
5397364 Kozak et al. Mar 1995 A
5423855 Marienne Jun 1995 A
5425772 Brantigan Jun 1995 A
5443514 Steffee Aug 1995 A
5458638 Kuslich et al. Oct 1995 A
5484437 Michelson Jan 1996 A
5489307 Kuslich et al. Feb 1996 A
5507813 Dowd et al. Apr 1996 A
5522899 Michelson Jun 1996 A
5534031 Matsuzaki et al. Jul 1996 A
5571109 Bertagnoli Nov 1996 A
D377527 Michelson Jan 1997 S
5593409 Michelson Jan 1997 A
5607424 Tropiano Mar 1997 A
5609635 Michelson Mar 1997 A
5609636 Kohrs et al. Mar 1997 A
5645084 McKay Jul 1997 A
5645598 Brosnahan, III Jul 1997 A
5658337 Kohrs et al. Aug 1997 A
5669909 Zdeblick et al. Sep 1997 A
5683463 Godefroy et al. Nov 1997 A
5702449 McKay Dec 1997 A
5741253 Michelson Apr 1998 A
5766252 Henry et al. Jun 1998 A
5772661 Michelson Jun 1998 A
5776199 Michelson Jul 1998 A
5782919 Zdeblick et al. Jul 1998 A
D397439 Koros et al. Aug 1998 S
5800547 Schäfer et al. Sep 1998 A
5800550 Sertich Sep 1998 A
5814084 Grivas et al. Sep 1998 A
5846484 Scarborough et al. Dec 1998 A
5855227 Stucchi Jan 1999 A
5860973 Michelson Jan 1999 A
5861041 Tienboon Jan 1999 A
5865845 Thalgott Feb 1999 A
5888222 Coates et al. Mar 1999 A
5888226 Rogozinski Mar 1999 A
5888227 Cottle Mar 1999 A
5899939 Boyce et al. May 1999 A
5904719 Errico et al. May 1999 A
5906635 Maniglia May 1999 A
5972368 McKay Oct 1999 A
5989289 Coates et al. Nov 1999 A
6033438 Bianchi et al. Mar 2000 A
6034295 Rehberg et al. Mar 2000 A
6037519 McKay Mar 2000 A
6039762 McKay Mar 2000 A
D425989 Michelson May 2000 S
6080155 Michelson Jun 2000 A
6083228 Michelson Jul 2000 A
6111164 Rainey et al. Aug 2000 A
6113638 Williams et al. Sep 2000 A
6120503 Michelson Sep 2000 A
6136031 Middleton Oct 2000 A
6139550 Michelson Oct 2000 A
6143032 Schafer et al. Nov 2000 A
6159214 Michelson Dec 2000 A
6165219 Kohrs et al. Dec 2000 A
6174311 Branch et al. Jan 2001 B1
6179875 Von Strempel Jan 2001 B1
6200347 Anderson et al. Mar 2001 B1
6206923 Boyd et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210412 Michelson Apr 2001 B1
6224607 Michelson May 2001 B1
6224631 Kohrs May 2001 B1
6231610 Geisler May 2001 B1
6235034 Bray May 2001 B1
6241770 Michelson Jun 2001 B1
6241771 Gresser Jun 2001 B1
6245108 Biscup Jun 2001 B1
6258125 Paul et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261586 McKay Jul 2001 B1
6270528 McKay Aug 2001 B1
6277149 Boyle et al. Aug 2001 B1
6294041 Boyce et al. Sep 2001 B1
6294187 Boyce et al. Sep 2001 B1
6342074 Simpson Jan 2002 B1
6348071 Steffee et al. Feb 2002 B1
6350283 Michelson Feb 2002 B1
6371988 Pafford et al. Apr 2002 B1
6383221 Scarborough et al. May 2002 B1
6391058 Kuslich et al. May 2002 B1
6395031 Foley et al. May 2002 B1
6398811 McKay Jun 2002 B1
6402785 Zdeblick et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409765 Bianchi et al. Jun 2002 B1
6423095 Van Hoeck et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425108 Chiang Jul 2002 B1
6468311 Boyd et al. Oct 2002 B2
6471724 Zdeblick et al. Oct 2002 B2
6482233 Aebi et al. Nov 2002 B1
6482584 Mills et al. Nov 2002 B1
6485517 Michelson Nov 2002 B1
6511509 Ford et al. Jan 2003 B1
6530955 Boyle et al. Mar 2003 B2
6554863 Paul et al. Apr 2003 B2
6562072 Fuss et al. May 2003 B1
6562073 Foley May 2003 B2
6572654 Santilli Jun 2003 B1
6575981 Boyd et al. Jun 2003 B1
6629998 Lin Oct 2003 B1
6635086 Lin Oct 2003 B2
6666890 Michelson Dec 2003 B2
6706067 Shimp et al. Mar 2004 B2
6749636 Michelson Jun 2004 B2
6808585 Boyce et al. Oct 2004 B2
6827740 Michelson Dec 2004 B1
6855168 Crozet Feb 2005 B2
6890355 Michelson May 2005 B2
6923810 Michelson Aug 2005 B1
6984245 McGahan et al. Jan 2006 B2
6989031 Michelson Jan 2006 B2
7022137 Michelson Apr 2006 B2
7048762 Sander et al. May 2006 B1
7087082 Paul et al. Aug 2006 B2
7115146 Boyer Oct 2006 B2
7156875 Michelson Jan 2007 B2
7387643 Michelson Jun 2008 B2
7435262 Michelson Oct 2008 B2
7455692 Michelson Nov 2008 B2
7462195 Michelson Dec 2008 B1
7479160 Branch et al. Jan 2009 B2
7534254 Michelson May 2009 B1
7534265 Boyd et al. May 2009 B1
7540882 Michelson Jun 2009 B2
7611536 Michelson Nov 2009 B2
7637950 Baccelli et al. Dec 2009 B2
7637951 Michelson Dec 2009 B2
7637954 Michelson Dec 2009 B2
7935149 Michelson May 2011 B2
20010010020 Michelson Jul 2001 A1
20010018614 Bianchi Aug 2001 A1
20010031254 Bianchi et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020116064 Middleton Aug 2002 A1
20020116065 Jackson Aug 2002 A1
20020193881 Shapiro et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030083748 Lee et al. May 2003 A1
20040064185 Michelson Apr 2004 A1
20040210313 Michelson Oct 2004 A1
20050216089 Michelson Sep 2005 A1
20060235519 Michelson Oct 2006 A1
20090105821 Michelson Apr 2009 A1
20090270991 Michelson Oct 2009 A1
20100030333 Michelson Feb 2010 A1
20100145463 Michelson Jun 2010 A1
20110264219 Rouben Oct 2011 A1
20130096687 Michelson Apr 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (39)
Number Date Country
35 05 567 May 1986 DE
0 077 159 Apr 1983 EP
0 179 695 Apr 1986 EP
0 260 044 Mar 1988 EP
0 307 241 Mar 1989 EP
0 392 076 Oct 1990 EP
0 577 179 Jan 1994 EP
0 599 419 Jun 1994 EP
0 627 204 Dec 1994 EP
0 637 440 Oct 1997 EP
0 834 295 Apr 1998 EP
2 724 312 Mar 1993 FR
2 703 580 Oct 1994 FR
2 727 003 May 1996 FR
2 761 879 Oct 1998 FR
57-029348 Feb 1982 JP
61-122859 Jun 1986 JP
62-155846 Jul 1987 JP
5-269160 Oct 1993 JP
8-266563 Oct 1996 JP
WO 9214423 Sep 1992 WO
WO 9301771 Feb 1993 WO
WO 9508306 Mar 1995 WO
WO 9508964 Apr 1995 WO
WO 9622747 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9640020 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9723174 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9723175 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9844877 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9848738 Nov 1998 WO
WO 9855052 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9963891 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0007527 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0074608 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0128465 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0168005 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0149220 Jul 2001 WO
WO 0162191 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0168004 Sep 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (30)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 60/115,388, filed Jan. 11, 1999; 80 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/118,793, filed Feb. 4, 1999; 41 pages.
Muschler, George F., et al.; “The Biology of Spinal Fusion;” Spinal Fusion, Science and Technique, Colter and Colter; Dec. 1989; 2 cover pages and pp. 9-21.
Zindrick, Michael R., et al.; “Lumbar Spine Fusion: Different Types and Indications;” The Lumbar Spine, vol. 1, Second Edition; 1996; 2 cover pages and pp. 588-593.
Crock, H.V.; Practice of Spinal Surgery; Springer-Verlag/Wien, New York (1983).
DeBowes, R.M., et al.; “Study of Bovine . . . Steel Baskets;” Transactions of the 29th Annual Meeting; Orthopaedic Research Society, vol. 8; Mar. 8-10, 1983; cover page and p. 407.
Otero-Vich, Jose M.; “Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion with Threaded Cylindrical Bone;” J. Neurosurg, vol. 63; Nov. 1985; 2 cover pages and pp. 750-753.
Butts, M.K., et al.; “Biomechanical Analysis of a New Method for Spinal Interbody Fixation;” 1987 Symposium, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, “Advances in Bioengineering”, Boston, MA; Dec. 13-18, 1987; 7 pages.
Crawley, Gregory R., et al.; “A Modified Cloward's Technique for Arthrodesis of the Normal Metacarpophalangeal Joint in the Horse:” Veterinary Surgery, vol. 17, No. 3; 1988; pp. 117-127.
Bagby, G.W.; Arthrodesis by the Distraction-Compression Method Using a Stainless Steel Implant; Orthopedics, vol. II, No. 6, pp. 931-934 (Jun. 1987).
Itoman, Moritoshi, et al.; “Banked Bone Grafting for Bone Defect Repair—Clinical Evaluation of Bone Union and Graft Incorporation;” J. Jpn. Orthop. Assoc., vol. 62; 1988; pp. 461-469.
Schmitz, H.J., et al.; “Performance of Alloplastic Materials and Design of an Artificial Disc;” The Artificial Disc; 1991; cover page and pp. 23-34.
Thieme; Fusion of the Lumbar Spine; “Anterior Monosegmental Fusion L5-S1;” Atlas of Spinal Operations; 1993; cover page and pp. 270-274.
White, et al.; Lumbar Spine Surgery, Techniques and Complications; History of Lumbar Spine Surgery; 1994; cover page and pp. 11-15, 27, 30, 35-45, 265-268.
European Opposition Document, Nov. 27, 1995—Opposing EP Patent No. 425 542 B1 Anterior Spinal Fusion Implant; 5 pages.
Laparoscopic Bone Dowel Surgical Technique; Brochure of Sofamor Danek; 1995; 17 pages.
Laparoscopic Bone Dowel Instruments; Brochure of Sofamor Danek; 1995; 2 pages.
Brochure of University of Florida Tissue Bank; MD-I and MD-II Custom Machine Cortical Dowels; Circa 1996; 2 pages.
Brochure of University of Florida Tissue Bank; MD-III Threaded Cortical Dowel; Circa 1996; 4 pages.
Glazer, P.A., et al.; Biomechanical Analysis of Multilevel Fixation Methods in the Lumbar Spine; Spine, vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 171-182 (1997).
Ray, C.D.; Spinal Interbody Fusions: A Review, Featuring New Generation Techniques; Neurosurgery Quarterly, 7(2):135-156 (1997).
A picture of a Medtronic, Sofamor Danek Display; titled “Evolving With Your Needs;” Apr. 6, 2000; 1 page.
RTI Precision Machined Allograft: The Surgeon's Choice, Brochure by Regeneration Technologies, Inc. (2000).
Puros ALIF Bone Graft, Brochure by Sulzer Spine-Tech (2001).
What's New at . . . Spine-Tech: Allograft and Thoracolumbar, Brochure Spine-Tech (Circa 2001).
New IBS Allograft, The C-TLIF Approach, Brochure of OrthoDevelopment (2002).
Introducing graftech Allografts, Webpage by Osteotech (Circa Jan. 2002).
RTI Tissue Services, Spinal Allograft, Webpage of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. (2002).
International Search Report mailed Aug. 14, 2000 from corresponding International PCT Application No. PCT/US00/12363, filed May 5, 2000; 1 page.
International Search Report mailed on Aug. 15, 2001, of corresponding International Application No. PCT/US01/11723, filed Apr. 19, 2001; 3 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110208313 A1 Aug 2011 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60281187 Apr 2001 US
60281124 Apr 2001 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 12455415 Jun 2009 US
Child 13100143 US
Parent 11089057 Mar 2005 US
Child 12455415 US
Parent 10112747 Apr 2002 US
Child 11089057 US