The present disclosure relates to orthopedic implants, and more particularly to spinal implants that facilitate fusion of bone segments and associated methods. Even more particularly, the present disclosure relates to a spinal fusion implant configured for lateral insertion.
The integrity of the spine, including its subcomponents like the vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs that are well known structural body parts forming the spine, are key to a patient's health. These parts may become crushed or damaged as a result of trauma or injury, or damaged by disease (e.g., by tumor, autoimmune disease), or as a result of wear over time or degeneration caused by the normal aging process.
In many instances, one or more damaged structural body parts can be repaired or replaced with a prosthesis or implant. For example, specific to the spine, one method of repair is to remove the damaged vertebra (in whole or in part) and/or the damaged disc (in whole or in part) and replace it with an implant or prosthesis. In some cases, it is necessary to stabilize a weakened or damaged spinal region by reducing or inhibiting mobility in the area to avoid further progression of the damage and/or to reduce or alleviate pain caused by the damage or injury. In other cases, it is desirable to join together the damaged vertebrae and/or induce healing of the vertebrae. Accordingly, an implant or prosthesis may be configured to facilitate fusion between two adjacent vertebrae. The implant or prosthesis may be placed without attachment means or fastened in position between adjacent structural body parts (e.g., adjacent vertebral bodies).
Typically, an implant or prosthesis is secured directly to a bone structure by mechanical or biological means. One manner of spine repair involves attaching a fusion implant or prosthesis to adjacent vertebral bodies using a fixation element, such as a screw. Most implants and their attachment means are configured to provide an immediate, rigid fixation of the implant to the implantation site. Unfortunately, after implantation the implants tend to subside, or settle, into the surrounding environment as the patient's weight is exerted upon the implant. In some cases, this subsidence may cause the rigidly fixed attachment means to either loosen, dislodge or potentially damage one or more of the vertebral bodies.
Several known surgical techniques can be used to implant a spinal prosthesis. The suitability of any particular technique may depend upon the amount of access available to the implant site. For instance, a surgeon may elect a particular entry pathway depending on the size of the patient or the condition of the patient's spine such as where a tumor, scar tissue, or other obstacle is present. Other times, it may be desirable to minimize intrusion into the patient's musculature and associated ligamentous tissue. In some patients who have had prior surgeries, implants or fixation elements may have already been inserted into the patient's spine and as such, an implant introduction pathway may have to account for these prior existing conditions.
Thus, it is desirable to provide an implant that can be easily inserted in accordance with a specific pathway or approach. For example, in certain situations, it is desirable to provide a spinal implant that can be inserted using a lateral approach. It is further desirable to provide an implant that is configured to reduce insertion forces. In addition, it is desirable to provide an implant and associated fixation elements that can account for subsidence that occurs with the implant subsequent to implantation while also providing rigid fixation.
Although the following discussion focuses on spinal implants or prostheses, it will be appreciated that many of the principles may equally be applied to other structural body parts within a human or animal body.
The present disclosure describes a spinal implant that is configured for lateral insertion into a patient's intervertebral disc space. In accordance with one exemplary embodiment, a spinal implant is provided having an upper surface, a lower surface, an anterior portion, a posterior portion and one or more apertures within the posterior portion for receiving at least one fixation element wherein the implant is configured for lateral insertion. For example, the anterior portion or leading edge of the implant may include a sharp, bullet shaped nose or tip. All or some of the apertures may be configured to permit a predetermined amount of nutation by a fixation element, thus allowing the fixation element to toggle from one position to another. The spinal implant may additionally include anti-migration features.
In one embodiment, a spinal implant comprises a body and one or more apertures. The body may comprise an upper surface, a lower surface, a tapered anterior portion, and a posterior portion, wherein the body is configured for lateral insertion between vertebral bodies of a patient's spine. The one or more apertures may be provided within the posterior portion of the body and can receive at least one fixation element. At least one of the apertures is configured to permit a predetermined amount of nutation by a fixation element.
In another embodiment, a method of treating a patient's spine comprises accessing at least a portion of a patient's spine via a lateral approach. A spinal implant is then inserted between vertebral bodies of the patient's spine, wherein the spinal implant comprises a body having an upper surface, a lower surface, a tapered anterior portion, a posterior portion, wherein the body is configured for lateral insertion between vertebral bodies of a patient's spine, the implant further including one or more apertures within the posterior portion of the body for receiving at least one fixation element, and wherein at least one of the apertures is configured to permit a predetermined amount of nutation by a fixation element. The spinal implant is attached with the at least one fixation elements to the vertebral bodies and a predetermined amount of toggling of the fixation element is permitted based on nutation of the fixation element during subsidence of the spinal implant.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the disclosure. Additional features of the disclosure will be set forth in part in the description which follows or may be learned by practice of the disclosure.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate several embodiments of the disclosure and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
Referring now to
As shown in
To facilitate ease of insertion, the anterior portion, or leading end 12 may be tapered or otherwise shaped for concomitant distraction of soft tissue during insertion. For example, the anterior portion 12 may be a sharp, bullet shaped nose or tip 22. The unique geometry of the implant 10 including this sharpened tip 22 supports reduced insertion forces, and may also help to separate tissue during the insertion. This can be helpful, for example, where scar tissue or other obstructions are present at the implantation site, or where there is stenosis and/or some other anatomic anomaly such as where the endplates have grown together.
The posterior portion, or trailing end 14 of the spinal implant 10 includes holes 26 for receiving fixation elements, such as bone screws 40. In the embodiment shown, the spinal implant 10 includes two screw holes 26, one extending superiorly and one extending inferiorly (see in particular
The holes 26 provide a path through which securing means (e.g., fixation elements such as bone screws 40) may be inserted so as to secure the implant 10 to respective superior and inferior vertebral bodies 2, 4. The holes 26 may be configured to accommodate a variety of securing means, such as screws, pins, staples, or any other suitable fastening device. In one embodiment, the fixation screws 40 may be self-tapping and/or self-drilling and may be of a bone-screw-type, such as those well known to skilled artisans. In some embodiments, the head portion 42 of the fixation screws 40 extends into an elongate body 44 that terminates at a tip 46. While the implant 10 is shown with screws 40 sized and shaped for unicortical bone fixation, it is contemplated that bone screws sized and shaped for bicortical bone fixation may also be employed with the present disclosure.
The holes 26 of the spinal implant 10 may be configured to permit a predetermined amount of screw toggle (i.e., angular skew) and enable a lag effect when the fixation screw 40 is inserted and resides inside the hole or lumen 26. In other words, the holes 26 permit a certain degree of nutation by the screw 40 and thus the screws 40 may toggle from one position to one or more different positions, for instance, during subsidence. As depicted in
As shown in
In some situations, after insertion into the vertebral body, the fixation element or screw 40 may work itself loose and/or back out, i.e., withdraw from the vertebral body. The consequence of back out or loosening includes improper or incomplete fusion, loss of stability, potential risk to the patient, and a separate costly and often painful revision surgery.
The spinal implant 10 and its components may be formed of any suitable medical grade material, such as biocompatible metals like stainless steel, titanium, titanium alloys, etc. or a medical grade plastic such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or another radiolucent material, ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), etc. If so desired, the implant 10 may also be formed of a bioresorbable material. The bioresorbable material may preferably be osteoconductive or osteoinductive (or both).
In one exemplary method of inserting the spinal implant 10, the surgeon prepares the implantation site by removing some disc material from the disc space 6 between two adjacent vertebrae 2, 4. Because the spinal implant 10 is configured for lateral insertion (i.e., as opposed to midline insertion), less disc material needs to be removed to accommodate the implant 10, which has a slim profile. This provides the benefit of preserving more of the patient's natural anatomy and more specifically, preserves the soft tissue and ligament surrounding the site. The spinal implant 10 may be provided to the surgeon with the screws 40 pre-attached, or separately, as desired. After the surgeon places the implant 10 in the desired location, such as the cervical region of a patient's spine, the surgeon can tighten the screws 40 into the surrounding bone tissue, thereby securing the implant 10.
As noted, the implant 10 may be configured to permit a predetermined amount of screw toggle and enable a lag effect when the fixation screw 40 is inserted and resides inside the hole or lumen 26. Upon tightening, the lag effect may be observed whereby the implant 10 draws bone tissue towards itself, which may promote better fusion.
As further noted, the predetermined screw toggle promotes locking of the screw 40 to the implant 10 after subsidence subsequent to implantation. For example, after surgery, the patient's natural movement will result in settling and subsidence of bone tissue and the implant 10 in situ. It is believed that during this process, the weight exerted upon the implant 10 causes the fixation screws 40 to toggle and eventually lock against one or more surfaces of the holes 26 of the implant 10.
Some practitioners prefer to allow some degree of movement between the implant and the adjacent vertebral body after implantation. In that case the screw heads 42 may be provided with contours on its underside that allow the screws 40 to toggle with respect to the contoured opening 26 of the implant 10. Other practitioners may prefer a more rigid implant that is firmly locked to the adjacent vertebral body. The embodiments of implant 10 allow either preference.
In the rigidly fixed version, the screws 40 may be provided without the contour on its underside (i.e., a relatively flat underside) while the opening 26 of the implant 10 would likewise not include a contour. Thus, when secured together, the screws 40 and implant 10 form a rigidly locked construct. Where rigid fixation is desired (i.e., no toggle), the underside of the screws 40 may also include surfaces features as well in order to provide secure attachment to the implant 10.
While a toggle and a rigidly fixed version of the implant 10 and screws 40 are described, it is understood that a combination of toggling and rigid fixation may be accomplished in a single implant 10. For example, it is possible to provide an implant 10 that allows toggling of one or more screws 40, while also allowing rigid fixation of the other of the screws 40.
It will also be appreciated that the angular positioning of the various holes, as described above, allows the present implant 10 to be of a relatively small size and therefore insertable from a lateral approach within the intervertebral spaces of the spine. Thus, it will be appreciated that the angular positioning of the holes is important to the effective operation of the implant 10 and the ability to “stack” implants in adjacent multilevel procedures without the securing means interfering with each other, which can be of major significance in some situations.
As illustrated, the spinal implant 10 may have any variety of surface features, such as anti-migration and bone attachment features. For example, it is contemplated that the implant may have threads, teeth, barbs, surface roughenings, etc. to assist in bone attachment. Further, biological agents such as bone growth factors, for example, may be employed to enhance bone attachment.
Other embodiments of the disclosure will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the disclosure provided herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional No. 61/259,401, filed Nov. 9, 2009, and entitled “SPINAL IMPLANT CONFIGURED FOR LATERAL INSERTION,” which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4904261 | Dove et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5192327 | Brantigan | Mar 1993 | A |
5306307 | Senter et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5425772 | Brantigan | Jun 1995 | A |
5766251 | Koshino | Jun 1998 | A |
6099531 | Bonutti | Aug 2000 | A |
6231610 | Geisler | May 2001 | B1 |
6241771 | Gresser et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6342074 | Simpson | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6558423 | Michelson | May 2003 | B1 |
6629998 | Lin | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6942697 | Lange et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6972019 | Michelson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984234 | Bray | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7232464 | Mathieu et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7326248 | Michelson | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7749269 | Peterman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763078 | Peterman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7776095 | Peterman et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7846207 | Lechmann et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7988734 | Peterman et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8137405 | Kostuik et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8287597 | Pimenta et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8425607 | Waugh et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8623088 | Tohmeh et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
20030100950 | Moret | May 2003 | A1 |
20030130737 | McGahan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030199881 | Bonutti | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20070233253 | Bray et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080065219 | Dye | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077247 | Murillo et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080154375 | Serhan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080249575 | Waugh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249625 | Waugh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090210062 | Thalgott et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100152853 | Kirschman | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
03053290 | Jul 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for corresponding EP Appl. No. 10829223.6, received Nov. 15, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110166657 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61259401 | Nov 2009 | US |