The invention relates to devices and methods for stabilizing the vertebral motion segment. More specifically, the field of the invention relates to an expandable spinal implant with fixation elements to fix the implant within an intervertebral space while providing controlled spinal correction in three dimensions for improved spinal intervertebral body distraction and fusion.
A conventional spine cage or implant is characterized by a kidney bean shaped body which is typically inserted in tandem posteriorly through the neuroforamen of the distracted spine after a trial implant creates a pathway. Existing devices for interbody stabilization have important and significant limitations, including inability to expand and distract the endplates while fixing the device to prevent relative movement between the device and an adjacent vertebral body. Current devices for interbody stabilization include static spacers composed of titanium, PEEK, and high performance thermoplastic polymer produced by VICTREX, (Victrex USA Inc, 3A Caledon Court; Greenville, S.C. 29615), carbon fiber, or resorbable polymers. Moreover, current interbody spacers do not maintain interbody lordosis and can contribute to the formation of a straight or even kyphotic segment and the clinical problem of “flatback syndrome.” Separation of vertebral endplates increases space available for the neural elements, specifically the neural foramen. Existing static cages do not reliably improve space for the neural elements. Therefore, what is needed is a spinal implant that will provide space for the neural elements posteriorly between the vertebral bodies, or at least maintain the natural bone contours to avoid neuropraxia (nerve stretch) or encroachment.
Conventional devices for intervertebral body stabilization includes poor interface between bone and the biomaterial of the device. Conventional static interbody spacers form a weak interface between bone and biomaterial. Although the surface of such implants is typically provided with a series of ridges or coated with hydroxyapetite, the ridges may be in parallel with applied horizontal vectors or side-to-side motion. That is, the ridges or coatings on the implant offer little resistance to movement applied to either side the endplates. Thus, nonunion is common in allograft, titanium and polymer spacers, due to motion between the implant and host bone.
This invention is generally directed to a spinal implant for insertion between superior and inferior vertebral end plates after partial or total removal of a spinal disc. The spinal implant embodying features of the invention is easily installed and is capable of holding the vertebral or joint sections with increased pullout strength to minimize the chance of implant fixation loss during the period when the implant is becoming incorporated into the arthrodesis bone block.
More specifically, the invention is particularly directed to a spinal implant which has one or more extendable fixation elements that engage or penetrate vertebral end plates and prevent movement between the implant and the vertebral end plates after implantation. The one or more expandable fixation elements have a contracted configuration within the implant so as to not interfere with the insertion of the implant between vertebral bodies and have an extended configuration with a distal tip extending beyond the surface of the implant to engage the vertebral end plates after implantation and fix the position of the implant with respect to the adjacent vertebral body. The fixation element may be extended in a variety of ways such as with fluid pressure, e.g. hydraulic fluid, by mechanical force, such as a threaded connection with a rotating driving member or other suitable means. Fluidic displacement is preferred. The distal tip of the fixation element should be sharp enough to penetrate into the vertebral end plate.
Preferably, the spinal implant embodying features of the invention is an expandable spinal implant such as the selectively expanding spine cage described in copending application Ser. No. 11/535,432, filed on Sep. 26, 2006 and Ser. No. 11/692,800, filed on Mar. 28, 2007, which provides restoration of disc height between adjacent vertebrae and can provide corrective spinal alignment in a plurality of dimensions. Preferably, the implant has an interior cavity for receiving osteoconductive material to promote the formation of new bone in the intervertebral space subsequent to implanting.
A spinal implant having features of the invention has a base including a first pressure applying member such as an end plate with a first bone engaging surface, at least one extendable member cooperating with the base and a second upper pressure applying member with a second bone engaging surface coupled to the at least one extendable member. The one or more extendable fixation elements are configured to extend through passageways provided in the second upper pressure applying member and beyond the bone engaging surface thereof to penetrate into the adjacent vertebral end plate and fix the implant with respect the vertebral body. Preferably, the fixation elements are slidably disposed within recesses within the extendable members.
The selectively expanding spine cage (SEC) or spinal implant embodying features of the invention is particularly suitable for posterior insertion between superior and inferior vertebral end plates as described in the aforementioned copending application Ser. Nos. 11/535,432 and 11/692,800. The SEC has an unexpanded configuration which allows easy deployment and is typically about 0.8 to about 1 cm in maximum short transverse dimension so as to enable minimal invasive insertion posteriorly between vertebral pedicles through a working space of approximately 1 cm in diameter. The extended fixation element extends beyond the tissue engaging surface of the second pressure applying member by at least 0.1 cm, preferably at least 0.25 cm to ensure proper engagement or contact with the end plate of the vertebral body and preferably penetration thereof.
In one preferred embodiment, at least one and preferably all of the extendable members of the SEC have an extendable fixation element disposed within a recess in the extendable member. In this embodiment, the implant is preferably fluid activated so the extendable members expand the SEC after implantation and be properly positioned between the adjacent vertebral bodies. Additionally, the fixation member is also extended by fluid pressure with or after expansion of the SEC. Preferably, the fluid expansion is by hydraulic fluid from a master cylinder or a syringe located remotely from the patient to enable controlled spinal correction in multiple dimensions and fixation of the SEC in a proper position. Individual cylinders or syringes may also be employed. Advantageously, the hydraulic fluid is a time-controlled curable polymer, such as methylmethacrylate, which has a viscosity and curing time that can be adjusted by the formulation of an appropriate added catalyst, as is well known. When the polymer cures, it hardens and locks the expanded expandable members and the expanded fixation element in position to provide the desired amount of anterior/posterior, medial/lateral, superior/inferior spinal correction immovably in place. Mechanical locking of the expandable members and/or the fixation elements may also be employed.
Once inserted between vertebral endplates, the implant advantageously can be expanded with a minimum of force exerted remotely through the hydraulic control lines. The expansion of the implant advantageously is about 20% to about 100% greater than the unexpanded height thereof, typically about 60%. Typical expansion is about 13 mm in the case of a 8 mm implant and about 16 mm in the case of a 10 mm implant.
Since the vertebral end plates are held together at one (the anterior) end by a ligament much like a clamshell, as the implant expands against the vertebral end plates, the amount of vertical expansion can be adjusted to create the desired anterior/posterior correction angle.
Left and right lateral correction of the spine is achieved by differential vertical expansion of the two or more extendable members of the implant. Each extendable member is preferably independently controlled by a master cylinder or syringe located ex vivo (away from the patient) and communicating hydraulically with the slave cylinders for moving the pistons and top plate vertically and laterally for correcting spinal deformities anteriorly or posteriorly, medial or lateral, thus available to provide spinal correction in three dimensions.
A minimally invasive downsized insertion tool both inserts the unexpanded SEC posteriorly and houses the hydraulic lines communicating between the master cylinder and the slave cylinder. The insertion tool also houses a line for communicating the liquid or slurry bone graft material to the slave cylinder and into the intervertebral space for subsequent fusion. Advantageously, the hydraulic lines are small size tubing to allow for high hydraulic pressure without danger of the lines bursting. The sizes of the slave cylinders and pistons can be varied to increase the mechanical advantage.
Due to the mechanical advantage provided by the hydraulic system, the SEC has minimized size and diameter in its unexpanded state that is smaller than the diameter of a prepared neuroforamen. The SEC thus can be inserted posteriorly and is engaged between the endplates of the adjacent vertebra to effectively distract the intervertebral area, restore space for neural elements, stabilize the motion segment and eliminate pathologic segmental motion. The SEC enhances spine arthrodesis by creating a rigid spine segment.
The SEC provides a significant advantage by enabling a comparatively large quantity of gone growth conductive or inductive agents to be contained within its interior communicating directly to adjacent bone. Importantly, this results in fixation forces greater than adjacent bone and soft tissue failure forces.
The hydraulic control system provides a minimally invasive procedure by enabling the surgeon to apply a controlling force away from the patient's body to expand and adjust the spinal implant in three dimensions. Preferably, the expansion is infinitely adjustable to provide a variety of height and lateral angles, and is not limited to incremental positions. The implant can be used to promote fusion, and/or to correct deformities such as scoliosis, kyphosis, and spondylolisthesis.
The clinical goals of the SEC and the method for its insertion provide a minimally invasive risk of trauma to nerve roots, reduce pain, improve function, and permit early mobilization of the patient after fusion surgery. The fixation elements maintain the implant in a desired position until healing (fusion or arthrodesis) occurs. At this point, the implant is incorporated inside bone and its role becomes quiescent. The present SEC provides more internal and external graft bone space exposure, easier and safer directed insertion, less risk of insertional damage to nerve roots and other tissue, and thus provide substantially improved immediate and long term results.
Thus, a key feature of the invention is that an essentially incompressible implant can be inserted posteriorly between vertebral pedicles in only a 1 cm working space. The implant then can be expanded to about 100% to about 200%, typically about 160%, of its original insertion size to provide a closely controlled full range of spinal correction in three dimensions. The one or more expandable fixation elements or spikes ensure that the implant remains in place after deployment. These and other advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description and the accompanying exemplary drawings.
As shown in these figures, the SEC 10 has a base 12 with a pressure applying end member or plate 13 having a surface 14 for engaging an end surface of an adjacent vertebral body. Extendable support members 15 and 16 cooperate with the base 12. A second end pressure applying member or plate 17 is coupled to the extendable support members 15 and 16 so that the plate 17 moves with the extension of extendable support members 15 and 16. The plate 17 may be fixed to only one of the extendable support member but also engageable with the other extendable support member. Each extendable support member may have a separate end plate fixed 17 thereto, as shown in
Additional details of the SEC such as the attachment of hydraulic lines and lines for transmission of a slurry or liquid bone graft material, device and hydraulic fluid delivery accessories and the like can be found in co-pending application Ser. No. 11/535,432 filed on Sep. 26, 2006 and Ser. No. 11/692,800, filed on Mar. 28, 2007, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Since vertebral end plates are held together at one end by a ligament much like a clamshell, expansion of the device 10 against the end plates of adjacent vertebral bodies can be adjusted to create the desired anterior/posterior correction angle.
The hydraulic fluid used to expand the SEC 10 and to extend the spikes 18 and 19 may advantageously be a time-controlled curable polymer such as methylmethacrylate. The viscosity and curing time of such a polymer can be adjusted by the formulation with an appropriate added catalyst as is well known. Such catalysts are available from LOCTITE Corp., 1001 Trout Brook Crossing, Rocky Hill, Conn. 06067. When the polymer cures, it hardens and locks the extendable members 15 and 16 and the spikes 18 and 19 in a desired position to provide the desired amount of spinal correction determined by the physician. Other means may be employed to lock the extendable members and the spikes in a desired position. For example, spring actuated locking fingers may be provided in the bore of one or more of the pistons and one or more of the bores of the spikes which extend outwardly when the piston or spike pass their respective locations upon extension thereof.
It will be appreciated that the SEC, including its various components should be formed of biocompatible, substantially incompressible material such as titanium, and preferably type 6-4 titanium alloy or other suitable materials which will allow for long term deployment within a patient.
The extension of extendable members 15 and 16 are preferably individually controlled so that the physician is able to provide a controlled angle of the SEC corrective surface. While only two extendable members are described herein, the SEC 10 may be provided with three or more individually extendable members so that the physician can exercise three-dimensional control of the SEC extension.
The SEC 10 embodying features of the invention provides advantages that include correction of coronal plane deformity; introduction of interbody lordosis, early stabilization of the interbody space with rigidity that is greater than present spacer devices and the ability to fix the SEC within the intervertebral space. This early stability may improve post-operative pain, preclude the need for posterior implants including pedicle screws, and improve the rate of successful arthrodesis. Importantly, the SEC provides improvement of space available for the neural elements while improving lordosis. As infused osteoinductive/osteoconductive bone graft materials heal, the patient becomes well and the implant becomes inert and quiescent, embedded in bone, and no longer needed.
While the invention has been described in connection with what are presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments and alternatives as set forth above, but on the contrary is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the scope of the following claims.
For example, the SEC 10 described herein is expanded by hydraulic fluid. Other expansion means may be employed. For example, a screw mechanism may be employed to expand the SEC and to extend one or more of the spikes into engagement with adjacent vertebral surfaces. Additionally, the spikes which help fix the SEC within the vertebral space are described herein as being extended with the extendable support members. However, the spikes may be slidably disposed in separate bores and independent expansion of the extendable support members.
Further, the SEC can be provided with load or pressure sensors that register differential pressure and pressure intensity exerted on the engaging surfaces of the SEC by the patient's vertebrae end plates to generate corrective signals, for example by control, that are used e.g. by the surgeon or by a computer controlled mechanism to realign the patient's spine. The invention may further include a system that makes these adjustments, responsive to sensor signals, in real time and on a continual basis, such that the shapes of the implant changes to realign the patient's spine or mechanism. Preferably, such system is contemplated for use in setting the positions of the pistons during installation of the implant.
Furthermore, the SEC needs not be rigidly locked into position but may be provided with yieldable material to provide some movement of the end surfaces of the SEC to accommodate spinal movement.
While particular forms of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, it will be apparent that various modifications and improvements can be made to the invention. Additional details of the spinal implant devices may be found in the patents and applications referenced herein. To the extent not otherwise disclosed herein, materials and structure may be of conventional design.
Moreover, individual features of embodiments of the invention may be shown in some drawings and not in others, but those skilled in the art will recognize that individual features of one embodiment of the invention can be combined with any or all the features of another embodiment. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited to the specific embodiments illustrated. It is therefore intended that this invention be defined by the scope of the appended claims as broadly as the prior art will permit.
Terms such as “element”, “member”, “component”, “device”, “means”, “portion”, “section”, “steps” and words of similar import when used herein shall not be construed as invoking the provisions of 35 U.S.0 § 112(6) unless the following claims expressly use the terms “means for” or “step for” followed by a particular function without reference to a specific structure or a specific action. All patents and all patent applications referred to above are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/594,569, filed on Jan. 12, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/072,044, filed on Feb. 22, 2008, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3875595 | Froning | Apr 1975 | A |
4932975 | Main et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4969888 | Scholten et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5236460 | Barber | Aug 1993 | A |
5653763 | Errico et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665122 | Kambin | Sep 1997 | A |
5723013 | Jeanson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5827328 | Butterman | Oct 1998 | A |
5865848 | Baker | Feb 1999 | A |
5916267 | Tienboon | Jun 1999 | A |
5980522 | Koros et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989290 | Biedermann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6039761 | Li et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6102950 | Vaccaro | Aug 2000 | A |
6127597 | Beyar et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6176881 | Schar et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193756 | Studer et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6214012 | Karpman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6296665 | Strnad et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6371989 | Chauvin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375682 | Fleischmann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375683 | Crozet et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395032 | Gauchet | May 2002 | B1 |
6454806 | Cohen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6527803 | Crozet et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6562074 | Gerbec et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6582467 | Teitelbaum et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585699 | Ljunggreen et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6692495 | Zacouto | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6719796 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6723126 | Berry | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6730088 | Yeh | May 2004 | B2 |
6764491 | Frey et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6830570 | Frey et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6835207 | Zacouto et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6866682 | An et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6875235 | Ferree | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6953477 | Berry | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960232 | Lyons et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6981989 | Fleischmann et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7001431 | Bao et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7018415 | McKay | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7018416 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7060037 | Lussier et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060073 | Frey et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066958 | Ferree | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7094257 | Mujwid et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7166110 | Yundt | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7204853 | Gordon et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214243 | Taylor | May 2007 | B2 |
7217293 | Branch, Jr. | May 2007 | B2 |
7282063 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7291150 | Graf | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7291158 | Crow et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7316686 | Dorchak et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7316714 | Gordon et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7351261 | Casey | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7407513 | Alleyne et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7419505 | Fleischmann et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7452359 | Michelson | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7470273 | Dougherty-Shah | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7481812 | Frey et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7485145 | Purcell | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7507241 | Levy et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7520900 | Trieu | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7563284 | Coppes et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7563286 | Gerber et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7621956 | Paul et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7628815 | Baumgartner et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7670359 | Yundt | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7708779 | Edie et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7722674 | Grotz | May 2010 | B1 |
7731752 | Edie et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7731753 | Reo et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7771480 | Navarro et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7794501 | Edie et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806935 | Navarro et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819921 | Grotz | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824444 | Biscup et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7824445 | Biro et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7854766 | Moskowitz et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7862618 | White et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7883543 | Sweeney | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7935124 | Frey et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7967863 | Frey et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967867 | Barreiro et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7985231 | Sankaran | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7985256 | Grotz et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8021395 | Ben-Mokhtar et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8025680 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8057549 | Butterman et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8062368 | Heinz et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8062373 | Fabian, Jr. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8070813 | Grotz et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8105382 | Olmos et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8137401 | Stad et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8153785 | Khire et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8187331 | Strohkirch, Jr. et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8192495 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8267939 | Cipoletti et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8273124 | Renganath et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8303663 | Jimenez et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8353961 | McClintock et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366777 | Matthis et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8394143 | Grotz et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8435296 | Kadaba et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8454695 | Grotz et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8480741 | Grotz et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8574297 | Stad et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8696751 | Ashley et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8894710 | Simpson et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8900305 | Stad et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8956413 | Ashley et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8992620 | Ashley et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9028550 | Shulock et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9545316 | Ashley et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9814600 | Shulock et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20010056302 | Boyer et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020128716 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138146 | Jackson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151976 | Foley et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030114899 | Woods et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040030346 | Frey et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040088054 | Berry | May 2004 | A1 |
20040097928 | Zdeblick et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040133273 | Cox | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153065 | Lim | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186576 | Biscup et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050033437 | Bao et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043800 | Paul et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049590 | Alleyne | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085910 | Sweeney | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107881 | Alleyne et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113842 | Bertagnoli et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050197702 | Coppes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216084 | Fleischmann et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229433 | Cachia | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251260 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256576 | Moskowitz et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273169 | Purcell | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273170 | Navarro et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273171 | Gordon et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060036259 | Carl et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060085073 | Raiszadeh | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089719 | Trieu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060106416 | Raymond et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116767 | Magerl et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142860 | Navarro et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142861 | Murray | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149377 | Navarro et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167547 | Suddaby | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060200244 | Assaker | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235426 | Lim et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235535 | Ferree et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060264968 | Frey et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070050030 | Kim | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050033 | Reo et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073395 | Baumgartner et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093901 | Grotz et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093903 | Cheng | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070123987 | Bernstein | May 2007 | A1 |
20070179611 | DiPoto et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233254 | Grotz | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255409 | Dickson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255413 | Edie et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255415 | Edie et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270961 | Ferguson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270964 | Strohkirch et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288092 | Bambakidis | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080021555 | White et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021556 | Edie | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080058930 | Edie et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058931 | White et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065082 | Chang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065220 | Alleyne et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065221 | Alleyne et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077150 | Nguyen | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086276 | Naka et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097441 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103601 | Biro et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114467 | Capote et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140207 | Olmos et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147193 | Matthis et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147194 | Grotz et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161933 | Grotz et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177387 | Parimore et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183204 | Greenhalgh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080215153 | Butterman et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243251 | Stad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281424 | Parry et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288073 | Renganath et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300598 | Barreiro et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005819 | Ben-Mokhtar et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090005874 | Fleischmann et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018661 | Kim et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043312 | Koulisis et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048676 | Fabian, Jr. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090105836 | Frey et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090171389 | Sankaran | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204215 | McClintock et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216331 | Grotz et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222100 | Cipoletti et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090270987 | Heinz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100016970 | Kapitan et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100057204 | Kadaba et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100145455 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145456 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100249930 | Myers | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100286783 | Lechmann et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110130835 | Ashley et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137416 | Myers | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110270398 | Grotz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288646 | Moskowitz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120059469 | Myers et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120116518 | Grotz et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130387 | Simpson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120245695 | Simpson et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120283830 | Myers | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130096677 | Myers et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130158669 | Sungarian et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130197642 | Ernst | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130197647 | Wolters et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130197648 | Boehm et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130204368 | Prevost | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130204374 | Milella, Jr. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130253650 | Ashley et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140018922 | Marino et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031938 | Lechmann et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20150148908 | Marino et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20170224506 | Ashley et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180064557 | Shulock et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180098860 | To et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180116811 | Bernard et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180125671 | Bernard et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3729600 | Mar 1989 | DE |
1442715 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1415624 | May 2006 | EP |
2001-518824 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2008-502372 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2003003951 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2004016250 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004016205 | May 2004 | WO |
2006044786 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2008011371 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2007124078 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008039811 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008112607 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2008148210 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009033100 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2008121251 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009064787 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009105182 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009114381 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2008086276 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010068725 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011011609 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011150077 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 11787340.6 dated Jun. 25, 2014. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP14159619 dated Jun. 12, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 5, 2009 for related PCT/US2009/000974. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 10, 2008 in related International Application No. PCT/US2007/079474. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 13, 2010, in related International Application No. PCT/US2009/067446 filed Dec. 10, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 30, 2009, in related International Application No. PCT/US2008/003776 filed Mar. 21, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 6, 2009, in related International Application No. PCT/US2009/000974 filed Feb. 17, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 11, 2010, in International Application No. PCT/US2010/031247 entitled “Insertion Handle for Implant.” |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 22, 2011 in related International Application No. PCT/US2011/037929. |
State Intellectual Property Office of The People's Republic of China Search Report for Chinese Application No. 201510859939.8 dated Oct. 24, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180333270 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14594569 | Jan 2015 | US |
Child | 15938442 | US | |
Parent | 12072044 | Feb 2008 | US |
Child | 14594569 | US |