This invention relates to orthopedic surgery and, in particular, spinal implants for replacement of ruptured or excised spinal disks.
Several attempts have been made to design a spinal prosthesis for replacement of missing or excised disk material that replicates the functions of the missing tissue. U.S. Pat. No. 4,759,769 to Hedman et al discloses a two piece artificial disk device in which two plates are attached to the adjacent vertebrae by bone screws inserted through flanges on the plates. A spring biasing mechanism is captured between the plates to simulate the actions of the natural disk material. U.S. Pat. No. 5,246,458 to Graham and U.S. Pat. No. 6,228,118 to Gordon disclose other intervertebral implants with arcuate flanges used to connect the device to adjacent vertebra.
The patents to Marnay, U.S. Pat. No. 5,314,477, Buttner-Janz et al, U.S. Pat. No. 5,401,269, Yuan et al, U.S. Pat. No. 5,676,701, and Shelokov, U.S. Pat. No. 6,039,763, all are directed to the design of the opposing faces of the adjacent plates of an implant to provide a limited universal joint to simulate the natural movement of the spine.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,683,465 to Shinn et al teaches two plates with bow shaped skirts which are interlocked.
What is needed in the art is a disk prosthesis that has limited universal motion yet is securely interlocked to prevent dislocation or separation.
A spinal implant for insertion between adjacent vertebrae to function as an disk prosthesis. The prosthesis is formed from two plates fastened to adjacent vertebrae facing each other. The facing sides of the plates each have a depending skirt formed as concentric arcs of about 90 degrees. The skirts are either bowed or tapered in the axial direction. A protrusion is centrally located between the arcs on one plate and a depression is centrally located between the arcs of the other plate. The plates are oriented to each other with the concentric arcs of each interrupted skirt at 90 degrees and the protrusion is engaged in the depression. The plates are then rotated about 90 degrees and the opposed arcs of one plate interlock with the opposed arcs of the other plate to prevent separation in the axial direction.
Therefore, it is an objective of this invention to provide a spinal implant for axial support of the spinal column which replicates the dimensions and function of an intervertebral disk.
It is another objective of this invention to provide a kit including all the components for assembly and surgical placement of an artificial spinal disk.
It is a further objective of this invention to provide a method of assembly of the components of the kit which results in an axially interlocked spinal implant.
It is yet another objective of this invention to provide a modified ball and socket joint between two plates attached to adjacent vertebrae permitting lateral rotation, lateral bending and vertical tilting.
It is a still further objective of this invention to provide shaped interrupted skirts on two plates which act as stop limits for tilting and bending.
Other objectives and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein are set forth, by way of illustration and example, certain embodiments of this invention. The drawings constitute a part of this specification and include exemplary embodiments of the present invention and illustrate various objects and features thereof.
The spinal implant 10, shown in
The upper plate 11 has a planar surface 14 for contact with the end wall of a vertebra and an opposite disk surface 15. Depending from the disk surface is an interrupted skirt 16 with opposed arcs 17 and 18. The arcs are approximately 180 degrees apart at their centers and extend about 90 degrees. The diameter of the arcs is less than the periphery of the plate 11 leaving a horizontal flange 19. Centrally located within the semi-circular arcs is the dome shaped depression or concavity 13.
The lower plate 12 has a planar surface 20 for contact with the end wall of a vertebra and an opposite disk surface 21. Upstanding from the disk surface is an interrupted skirt 22 with opposed arcs 23 and 24. The arcs are approximately 180 degrees apart at their centers and extend about 90 degrees. The diameter of the arcs is less than the periphery of the plate 12 leaving a horizontal flange 25. Centrally located within the semi-circular arcs is the protrusion 26. The end 27 of the protrusion is rounded and shaped to closely fit the contours of the depression 13. The protrusion 26 is of such dimensions as to support the weight of the spinal column.
As shown, though the relationship could be reversed, the opposed arcs 17 and 18 of the depending interrupted skirt 16 are concentric with the opposed arcs 23 and 24 of the upstanding interrupted skirt and of lesser diameter allowing rotation of the plates relative to each other with surface contact between the outer surface 28 of the depending arcs and the inner surface 29 of the upstanding arcs.
As shown in
The spinal implant provides support and range of motion similar to the natural joint in that the plates 11 and 12 may rotate axially, as shown in
As shown in
The kit contains plates with protrusions and skirts of varying lengths to allow selection of components for an implant with the axial dimension substantially the same as the thickness of the disk the implant will replace. The kit may also contain upper and lower plate components of varying sizes.
A number of embodiments of the present invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited by the specific illustrated embodiment but only by the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
566360 | White | Aug 1896 | A |
1436573 | Choppinet et al. | Nov 1922 | A |
2836442 | Moskovitz | May 1958 | A |
3325197 | Wehner | Jun 1967 | A |
3426364 | Lumb | Feb 1969 | A |
3857642 | Miller | Dec 1974 | A |
3875595 | Froning | Apr 1975 | A |
4074542 | Hankosky et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4156070 | Jackson, Jr. et al. | May 1979 | A |
4238600 | Jackson, Jr. et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4257129 | Volz | Mar 1981 | A |
4289123 | Dunn | Sep 1981 | A |
4309777 | Patil | Jan 1982 | A |
4349921 | Kuntz | Sep 1982 | A |
4401112 | Rezaian | Aug 1983 | A |
4412058 | Siemionko | Oct 1983 | A |
4499259 | Irwin | Feb 1985 | A |
4605417 | Fleischauer | Aug 1986 | A |
4614789 | Dicke et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4636217 | Ogilvie et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4655778 | Koeneman | Apr 1987 | A |
4664972 | Connolly | May 1987 | A |
RE32449 | Claussen et al. | Jun 1987 | E |
4714469 | Kenna | Dec 1987 | A |
4749769 | Kock et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4756711 | Mai et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4759766 | Buettner-Janz et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4759769 | Hedman et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4770659 | Kendall | Sep 1988 | A |
4787908 | Wyss et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4863476 | Shepperd | Sep 1989 | A |
4863477 | Monson | Sep 1989 | A |
4874389 | Downey | Oct 1989 | A |
4892545 | Day et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4904261 | Dove et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4919666 | Buchhorn et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4932969 | Frey et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4932975 | Main et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936848 | Bagby | Jun 1990 | A |
4946378 | Hirayama et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4946458 | Harms et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4955908 | Frey et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4955916 | Carignan et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4997432 | Keller | Mar 1991 | A |
5002576 | Fuhrmann et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5024670 | Smith et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5041139 | Branemark | Aug 1991 | A |
5047055 | Bao et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5071437 | Steffee | Dec 1991 | A |
5123926 | Pisharodi | Jun 1992 | A |
5145134 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5192326 | Bao et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5236460 | Barber | Aug 1993 | A |
5246458 | Graham | Sep 1993 | A |
5258031 | Salib et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5258043 | Stone | Nov 1993 | A |
5306307 | Senter et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306308 | Gross et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306309 | Wagner et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5308412 | Shetty et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314477 | Marnay | May 1994 | A |
5320644 | Baumgartner | Jun 1994 | A |
5360430 | Lin | Nov 1994 | A |
5370697 | Baumgartner | Dec 1994 | A |
5401269 | Buttner-Janz et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5404182 | Nomura | Apr 1995 | A |
5414704 | Spinney | May 1995 | A |
5425773 | Boyd et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5425777 | Sarkisian et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5458638 | Kuslich et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458641 | Ramirez Jimenez | Oct 1995 | A |
5458642 | Beer et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5474555 | Puno et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5489308 | Kuslich et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5507816 | Bullivant | Apr 1996 | A |
5534029 | Shima | Jul 1996 | A |
5534030 | Navarro et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5538427 | Hoffman et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549680 | Gordon | Aug 1996 | A |
5556431 | Buttner-Janz | Sep 1996 | A |
5562738 | Boyd et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5566687 | Trapanovski | Oct 1996 | A |
5588625 | Beak | Dec 1996 | A |
5603478 | Wang | Feb 1997 | A |
5645596 | Kim et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5674296 | Bryan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676701 | Yuan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683465 | Shinn et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5782832 | Larsen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5893889 | Harrington | Apr 1999 | A |
5895428 | Berry | Apr 1999 | A |
5899941 | Nishijima et al. | May 1999 | A |
6001130 | Bryan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6019792 | Cauthen | Feb 2000 | A |
6039763 | Shelokov | Mar 2000 | A |
6063121 | Xavier et al. | May 2000 | A |
6146421 | Gordon et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6179874 | Cauthen | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6228118 | Gordon | May 2001 | B1 |
6416551 | Keller | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6517580 | Ramadan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6579321 | Gordon et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6682562 | Viart et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
20040193273 | Huang | Sep 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050197704 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |