Spinal implants

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8679118
  • Patent Number
    8,679,118
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 23, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 25, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
The present invention is directed to a variety of spinal implants.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates generally to interbody spinal fusion implants, and in particular to spinal fusion implants configured to restore and maintain two adjacent vertebrae of the spine in anatomical lordosis.


2. Description of the Prior Art


Interbody spinal fusion refers to the method of achieving bony bridging between adjacent vertebrae through the disc space, the space between adjacent vertebrae normally occupied by a spinal disc. Numerous implants to facilitate such a fusion have been described by Cloward, Brantigan, and others, and are known to those skilled in the art. Generally, cylindrical implants offer the advantage of conforming to an easily prepared recipient bore spanning the disc space and penetrating into each of the adjacent vertebrae. Such a bore may be created by use of a drill. It is an anatomical fact that both the cervical spine and the lumbar spine are normally lordotic, that is convex forward. Such alignment is important to the proper functioning of the spine. Commonly, those conditions which require treatment by spinal fusion are associated with a loss of lordosis.


Therefore, there exists a need for spinal fusion implants that permit for the restoration of anatomical lordosis.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to a variety of interbody spinal fusion implants having at least a partially frusto-conical configuration. In the preferred embodiment, the spinal fusion implants of the present invention have a body that is partially or fully frusto-conical shape substantially along the portion of the implant in contact with the adjacent vertebrae of the spine. The spinal fusion implants of the present invention have an external thread for engaging the adjacent vertebrae of the spine and have an insertion end and a trailing end. The external thread may have a variable or constant thread radius and/or a constant or variable thread height measured from the body of the implant.


The spinal fusion implants of the present invention may be further modified so that while the upper and lower surfaces are portions of a frusto-cone, at least one side portion may be truncated to form a planar surface that is parallel to the central longitudinal axis of the implant to form straight walls. These implants may have a more tapered aspect at the insertion end of the implant to facilitate insertion. The spinal fusion implants of the present invention may be relatively solid and/or porous and/or hollow, and may have surface roughenings to promote bone ingrowth and stability.


The spinal fusion implants of the present invention may have wells extending into the material of the implant from the surface for the purpose of holding fusion promoting materials and to provide for areas of bone ingrowth fixation. These wells, or holes, may pass either into or through the implant and may or may not intersect. The spinal fusion implants of the present invention may have at least one chamber which may be in communication through at least one opening to the surface of the implant. Said chamber may have at least one access opening for loading the chamber with fusion promoting substances. The access opening may be capable of being closed with a cap or similar means.


The spinal fusion implants of the present invention offer significant advantages over the prior art implants:

    • 1. Because the spinal fusion implants of the present invention are at least partially frusto-conical in shape, those that taper from the leading edge to the trailing edge are easy to introduce and easy to fully insert into the spinal segment to be fused. In another embodiment, where the trailing edge of the implant is larger than the leading edge, the implant utilizes a tapered forward portion and an increasing thread height relative to the body from the leading edge to the trailing edge to facilitate insertion.
    • 2. The shape of the implants of the present invention is consistent with the shape of the disc, which the implants at least in part replace, wherein the front of the disc is normally taller than the back of the disc, which allows for normal lordosis. The implants of the present invention are similarly taller anteriorly than they are posteriorly.
    • 3. The spinal fusion implants of the present invention conform to a geometric shape, which shape is readily producible at the site of fusion, to receive said spinal fusion implants.


The spinal fusion implants of the present invention can be made of any material appropriate for human implantation and having the mechanical properties sufficient to be utilized for the intended purpose of spinal fusion, including various metals such as cobalt chrome, stainless steel or titanium including its alloys, various plastics including those which are bio-absorbable, and various ceramics or combination sufficient for the intended purpose. Further, the spinal fusion implants of the present invention may be made of a solid material, a mesh-like material, a porous material and may comprise, wholly or in part, materials capable of directly participating in the spinal fusion process, or be loaded with, composed of, treated of coated with chemical substances such as bone, morphogenic proteins, hydroxyapatite in any of its forms, and osteogenic proteins, to make them bioactive for the purpose of stimulating spinal fusion. The implants of the present invention may be wholly or in part bioabsorbable.


OBJECTS OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is easily inserted into the spine, having a tapered leading end;


It is another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that tapers in height from one end to the other consistent with the taper of a normal spinal disc;


It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is capable of maintaining anatomic alignment and lordosis of two adjacent vertebrae during the spinal fusion process;


It is still another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is self stabilizing within the spine;


It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is capable of providing stability between adjacent vertebrae when inserted;


It is still another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is capable of participating in the fusion process by containing, being composed of, or being treated with fusion promoting substances;


It is further another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is capable of spacing apart and supporting adjacent vertebrae during the spinal fusion process;


It is still further another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant that is consistent in use with the preservation of a uniform thickness of the subchondral vertebral bone;


It is another object of the present invention to provide a spinal fusion implant having a shape which conforms to an easily produced complementary bore at the fusion site; and


It is a further object of the present invention to provide a frusto-conical spinal fusion implant which may be placed side by side adjacent to a second identical implant across the same disc space, such that the combined width of the two implants is less than sum of the individual heights of each implant.


It is a further object of the present invention to provide a frusto-conical spinal fusion implant which may be placed side by side adjacent to a second identical implant across the same disc space, such that the combined width of the two implants is less than sum of the individual lengths of each implant.


These and other objects of the present invention will become apparent from a review of the accompanying drawings and the detailed description of the drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of the spinal fusion implant of the present invention having a body that is frusto-conical with an external thread having a substantially uniform radius.



FIG. 1A is an enlarged fragmentary view along line 1A of FIG. 1 illustrating the surface configuration of the implant of FIG. 1.



FIG. 1B is an enlarged fragmentary view along line 1A of FIG. 1 illustrating an alternative embodiment of the surface configuration of the implant of the present invention made of a cancellous material.



FIG. 1C is a cross sectional view along lines 1C-1C of FIG. 1B illustrating the alternative embodiment of the surface configuration of the implant of the present invention made of a cancellous material.



FIG. 1D is an enlarged fragmentary view along line 1A of FIG. 1 illustrating an alternative embodiment of the surface configuration of the implant of the present invention made of a fibrous mesh-like material.



FIG. 1E is a fragmentary view along line 1A of FIG. 1 illustrating an alternative embodiment of the surface configuration, of the implant of the present invention comprising a plurality of spaced apart posts.



FIG. 1F is an enlarged fragmentary sectional view along lines 1F-1F of FIG. 1E illustrating the surface configuration of the implant of FIG. 1E.



FIG. 2 is an alternative embodiment of the spinal fusion implant of the present invention having a frusto-conical body with an external thread radius and thread height that are not constant.



FIG. 3 is as cross sectional view along line 3-3 of the implant of FIG. 2.



FIG. 4 is a side elevational view of an alternative embodiment of the spinal fusion implant of the present invention.



FIG. 5 is a side elevational view and partial cut-away of a segment of the spinal column in lordosis showing the spinal fusion implant of FIG. 4 being implanted with a driving instrument from the posterior approach to the spinal column.



FIG. 6 is a side elevational view of an alternative embodiment of the spinal fusion implant of the present invention having a frusto-conical body and truncated sides.



FIG. 7 is an end view along line 7-7 of the spinal fusion implant of FIG. 6 shown placed beside a second identical implant shown in hidden line.



FIG. 8 is a side elevational view of an alternative embodiment of the spinal fusion implant of the present invention having a body with an irregular configuration.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring to FIG. 1, a side elevational view of the spinal fusion implant of the present invention generally referred to by numeral 20 is shown. The implant 20 has a body 22 that is frusto-conical in shape such that the body 22 has a diameter (root diameter) that is generally frusto-conical. The body 22 has an insertion end 24 and a trailing end 26. The insertion end 24 may include a tapered portion 25 to facilitate insertion of the spinal implant 20. In the preferred embodiment, when the implant 20 is inserted from the anterior aspect of the spine, the body 22 of the implant 20 has a maximum diameter at a point nearest to the trailing end 26 and a minimum diameter at a point nearest to the insertion end 24.


The implant 20 has an external thread 28 having a substantially uniform radius R1 measured from the central longitudinal axis L1 of the implant 20. The outer locus of the external thread 28 (major diameter) has an overall configuration that is substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis L1. While the major diameter of the implant 20 is substantially uniform, the external thread 28 may be modified at the leading edge by having initially a reduced thread radius to facilitate insertion of the implant 20 and may also be modified to make the external thread 28 self-tapping. In the preferred embodiment, the external thread 28 has a first thread 30 of a lesser radius than the radius R1 of the remainder of the external thread 28 to facilitate insertion of the implant 20. The second thread 32 has a greater radius than the first thread 30, but is still shorter than the radius R1 of the remainder of the external thread 28 which is thereafter of constant radius.


The body 22 is frusto-conical substantially along the portion of the body 22 in contact with the adjacent vertebrae of the spine which allows for creating and maintaining the adjacent vertebrae of the spine in the appropriate angular relationship to each other in order to preserve and/or restore the normal anatomic lordosis of the spine. The substantially uniform radius R1 of the external thread 28 of the implant 20 allows engaging the bone of the adjacent vertebrae in a position that counters the forces which tend to urge the implant 20 from between the adjacent vertebrae in the direction opposite to which the implant 20 was implanted. The greater thread height measured from the body 22 near the leading end 24 of the implant 20 provides greater purchase into the vertebral bone and again enhances the stability of the implant 20. Further, the configuration of the external thread 28 increases the surface area of the implant 20 in contact with the vertebrae to promote bone ingrowth.


The implant 20 has a recessed slot 34 at its trailing end 26 for receiving and engaging insertion instrumentation for inserting the implant 20. The recessed slot 34 has a threaded opening 36 for threadably attaching the implant 20 to instrumentation used for inserting the implant 20.


Referring to FIG. 1A, the implant 20 has an outer surface 38 that is porous to present an irregular surface to the bone to promote bone ingrowth. The outer surface 38 is also able to hold fusion promoting materials and provides for an increased surface area to engage the bone in the fusion process and to provide further stability. The pores of the outer surfaces 38 are microscopic in size having a diameter that is less than 1 mm, in the range of 50-1000 microns, with 250-500 microns being the preferred diameter. It is appreciated that the outer surface 38, and/or the entire implant 20, may comprise any other porous material or roughened surface sufficient to hold fusion promoting substances and/or allow for bone ingrowth and/or engage the bone during the fusion process. The implant 20 may be further coated with bioactive fusion promoting substances including, but not limited to, hydroxyapatite compounds, osteogenic proteins and bone morphogenic proteins. The implant 20 is shown as being solid, however it is appreciated that it can be made to be substantially hollow or hollow in part.


Referring to FIG. 1B, an enlarged fragmentary view along line 1A of FIG. 1 illustrating an alternative embodiment of the surface configuration 38 of the implant of the present invention made of a cancellous material is shown. The cancellous material 50, similar in configuration to human cancellous bone, having interstices 52 such that the outer surface 38 has a configuration as shown in FIGS. 1B and 1C. As the implant of the present invention may be made entirely or in part of the cancellous material 50, the interstices 52 may be present in the outer surface 338 and/or within the entire implant to promote bone ingrowth and hold bone fusion promoting materials.


Referring to FIG. 1D, an enlarged fragmentary view along line 1A of FIG. 1 illustrating an alternative embodiment of the surface configuration of the implant of the present invention made of a fibrous mesh-like material is shown. The mesh-like material 60 comprises strands 62 that are formed and pressed together such that interstices 64, capable of retaining fusion promoting material and for allowing for bone ingrowth, are present between the strands in at least the outer surface 38 of implant of the present invention.


Referring to FIGS. 1E and 1F, a fragmentary view along line 1A of FIG. 1 illustrating an alternative embodiment of the surface configuration 38 of the implant of the present invention comprising a plurality of spaced apart posts 70 is shown. The posts 70 have a head portion 72 of a larger diameter than the remainder of the posts 70, and each of the interstices 74 is the reverse configuration of the posts 72, having a bottom 76 that is wider than the entrance to the interstices 74. Such a configuration of the posts 70 and interstices 74 aids in the retention of bone material in the surface 38 of the implant and further assists in the locking of the implant into the bone fusion mass created from the bone ingrowth. As the bone ingrowth at the bottom 76 of the interstices is wider than the entrance, the bone ingrowth cannot exit from the entrance and is locked within the interstice 74. The surface of the implant provides for an improvement in the available amount of surface area which may be still further increased by rough finishing, flocking or otherwise producing a non smooth surface.


In the preferred embodiment, the posts 70 have a maximum diameter in the range of approximately 0.1-2 mm and a height of approximately 0.1-2 mm and are spaced apart a distance of approximately 0.1-2 mm such that the interstices 74 have a width in the range of approximately 0.1 to 2 mm. The post sizes, shapes, and distributions may be varied within the same implant.


In the preferred embodiment, for use in the lumbar spine, the implant 20 has an overall length in the range of approximately 24 mm to 32 mm with 26 mm being the preferred length. The body 22 of the implant 20 has a root diameter at the insertion end 24 in the range of 8-20 mm, with 14-16 mm being the preferred root diameter at the insertion end, and a root diameter at the trailing end 26 in the range of 10-24 mm, with 16-18 mm being the preferred diameter at the trailing end 26, when said implants, are used in pairs. When used singly in the lumbar spine, the preferred diameters would be larger.


In the preferred embodiment, the implant 20 has a thread radius R1 in the range of 6 mm to 12 mm, with 9-10 mm being the preferred radius R1. For use in the cervical spine, the implant 20 has an overall length in the range of approximately 10-22 mm, with 12-14 mm being the preferred length. The body 22 of the implant 20 has a root diameter at the insertion end 24 in the range of 8-22 mm, with 16-18 mm being the preferred root diameter at the insertion end when used singly, and 8-10 mm when used in pairs. The body 22 of the implant 20 has a root diameter at the trailing end 26 in the range of 10-24 mm, with 18-20 mm being the preferred root diameter at the trailing end 26 when used singly, and 10-12 mm when used in pairs; a thread radius, R1 in the range of approximately 4-12 mm, with 9-10 mm being the preferred radius R1 when inserted singularly and 5-7 mm when inserted side by side in pairs.


Referring to FIG. 2, an alternative embodiment of implant 20 is shown and generally referred to by the numeral 120. The implant 120 has a body 122 similar to body 122 of implant 120 and has an external thread 128 having a radius R3 measured from the central longitudinal axis L3 of the implant 120. The thread radius R3 is not constant throughout the length of the implant 120 and the external thread 128 has a thread height that is also not constant with respect to the body 122 of the implant 120. In the preferred embodiment, the implant 120 has an external thread 128 with a radius R3 that increases in size from the insertion end 124 to the trailing end 126 of the implant 120.


Referring to FIG. 3, a cross sectional view along line 3-3 of the implant 120 is shown. The implant 120 has an outer wall 144 surrounding an internal chamber 146. The large and small openings 140 and 142 may pass through the outer wall 144 to communicate with the internal chamber 146. The internal chamber 146 may be filled with bone material or any natural bone growth material or fusion promoting material such that bone growth occurs from the vertebrae through the openings 140 and 142 to the material within internal chamber 146. While the openings 140 and 142 have been shown in the drawings as being circular, it is appreciated that the openings 140 and 142 may have any shape, size configuration or distribution, suitable for use in a spinal fusion implant without departing from the scope of the present invention.


The openings 140 and 142 are macroscopic in size having a diameter that is greater than 1 mm. The large openings 140 have a diameter in the range of 206 mm, with the preferred diameter being 3.5 mm; and the small openings have a diameter in the range of 1-2 mm, with 1.5 mm being the preferred diameter.


The implant 120 has a cap 148 with a thread 150 that threadably attaches to the insertion end 124 of the spinal fusion implant 120. The cap 148 is removable to provide access to the internal chamber 146, such that the internal chamber 146 can be filled and hold any natural or artificial osteoconductive, osteoinductive, osteogenic, or other fusion enhancing material. Some examples of such materials are bone harvested from the patient, or bone growth inducing material such as, but not limited to, hydroxyapatite, hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate; or bone morphogenic protein. The cap 148 and/or the spinal fusion implant 120 may be made of any material appropriate for human implantation including metals such as cobalt chrome, stainless steel, titanium, plastics, ceramics, composites and/or may be made of, and/or filled, and/or coated with a bone ingrowth inducing material such as, but not limited to, hydroxyapatite or hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate or any other osteoconductive, osteoinductive, osteogenic, or other fusion enhancing material. The cap 148 and the implant 120 may be partially or wholly bioabsorbable.


Referring to FIG. 4, a side elevational view of an alternative embodiment of the spinal fusion implant of the present invention generally referred to by numeral 520 is shown. The implant 520 has a body 522 having a root diameter that is frusto conical in the reverse direction as that implant 20 shown in FIG. 1, in order to preserve and/or restore lordosis in a segment of spinal column when inserted from the posterior aspect of the spine. The body 522 has an insertion end 524 and a trailing end 526. In the preferred embodiment, the body 522 of the implant 520 has a minimum diameter at a point nearest to the trailing end 526 and a maximum diameter at a point nearest to the insertion end 524. The insertion end 524 may have an anterior nose cone portion 530 presenting a tapered end to facilitate insertion.


The implant 520 has an external thread 528 having a substantially uniform radius R6 measured from the central longitudinal axis L6 of the implant 520 such that the external diameter of the external thread 528 (major diameter) has an overall configuration that is substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis L6. It is appreciated that the thread 528 can have a major diameter that varies with respect to the longitudinal axis L6, such that the major diameter may increase from the insertion end 524 to the trailing end 526 or the reverse. The external thread 528 has a thread height measured from the body 522 that increases from the insertion end 524 to the trailing end 526.


Referring to FIG. 5, a segment of the spinal column S is shown with the vertebrae V1 and V2 in lordosis and an implant 520 shown being inserted from the posterior aspect of the spinal column S with an instrument driver D. The implant 520 is inserted with the larger diameter insertion end 524 first in order to in initially distract apart the vertebrae V1 and V2 which then angle toward each other posteriorly as the implant 520 is fully inserted. It is appreciated that the insertion of implant 520 does not require the adjacent vertebrae V1 and V2 to be placed in lordosis prior to insertion, as the full insertion of the implant 520 itself is capable of creating the desired lordotic angular relationship of the two vertebrae V1 and V2.


In the preferred embodiment, for use in the lumbar spine, the implant 520 has an overall length in the range of approximately 24 m 30 mm, with 26 mm being the preferred length. The body 522 of the implant 520 has a root diameter at the insertion end 524 in the range of 12-22 mm, with 16 mm being the preferred root diameter at the-insertion end, and a root diameter at the trailing end 526 in the range of 10-20 mm, with 14 mm being the preferred diameter at the trailing end 526. In the preferred embodiment, the implant 520 has a thread radius R6 in the range of 6 mm to 12 mm, with 8 mm being the preferred radius R6.


Referring to FIG. 6, an alternative embodiment of the spinal fusion implant of the present invention generally referred to by the numeral 620 and a partial fragmentary view of a second identical implant, generally referred to by the numeral 621 are shown. The implant 620 has a body 622 that is partially frusto-conical in shape similar to body 22 of implant 20 shown in FIG. 1, and has an insertion end 624 and a trailing end 626. The body 622 of the implant 620 has truncated sides 670 and 672 forming planar surfaces that are parallel to the longitudinal axis L7. In this manner, two implants 620 and 621 may be placed side by side, with one of the sides 670 or 672 of each implant with little space between them, such that the area of contact with the bone of the adjacent vertebrae is maximized. It is appreciated that the body 622 may also be cylindrical in shape and have truncated sides 670 and 672.


The implant 620 has an external thread 628 having a radius R6 measured from the central longitudinal axis L7 that may be constant, such that the major diameter or outer locus-of the external thread 628 has an overall configuration that is substantially, cylindrical. It is appreciated that the external thread 628 may have a thread radius R7 that is variable with respect to the longitudinal axis L7 such that the major diameter or outer locus of the external thread 628 has an overall configuration that is substantially frusto-conical.


Referring to FIG. 7, an end view of the implant 620 placed beside implant 621 is shown. The implant 620 has a thread radius that is substantially constant and has a thread height measured from the body 622 that is greater at the sides 670 and 672. In this manner, two implants 620 and 621 can be placed beside each other with the external thread 628 of each implant interdigitated allowing for closer adjacent placement of the two implants as a result of the substantial overlap of the external thread 628 at the side 670 or 672 of the implants.


Referring to FIG. 8, an alternative embodiment of the implant of the present invention is shown and generally referred to by the numeral 700. The implant 700 is similar in configuration to implant 20 shown in FIG. 1, except that the body 722 has an irregular configuration. The configuration of the body 722 has a root diameter D which is variable in size throughout the length of the implant 700 and, as shown in this embodiment, comprises larger diameter portions 750 and smaller diameter portions 752. It is appreciated that each of the large diameter portions 750 may be of the same or different diameter and each of the smaller diameter portions 752 may be of the same or different diameter.


The outer surface of the body 722 of implant 720 may be filled with fusion promoting substances such that the smaller diameter portions 752 may hold such fusion promoting substances. If so filled, the composite of the implant 700 and the fusion promoting material could still produce an even external surface of the body 722 if so desired.


While the present invention has been described in detail with regards to the preferred embodiments, it is appreciated that other variations of the present invention may be devised which do not depart from the inventive concept of the present invention. In particular, it is appreciated that the various teachings described in regards to the specific embodiments herein may be combined in a variety of ways such that the features are not limited to the specific embodiments described above.


Each of the features disclosed in the various embodiments and their functional equivalents may be combined in any combination sufficient to achieve the purposes of the present invention as described herein.

Claims
  • 1. An interbody spinal implant for insertion into an implantation space formed at least in part between and into two adjacent vertebral bodies of the human spine, said implant comprising: a body having a leading end, a trailing end, an upper surface adapted to contact one of the adjacent vertebral bodies, and a lower surface adapted to contact the other of the adjacent vertebral bodies, a central longitudinal axis through said leading and trailing ends, and a width perpendicular to the central longitudinal axis, each of said upper and lower surfaces having an arcuate surface extending across at least a portion of the width of said body;a first plurality of surface projections, each of said first plurality of surface projections having a head and a neck, said head and said neck each having a width in a plane parallel to the width of said body, the width of said head being greater than the width of said neck, said head having a linear portion along at least a portion of the width of said head, said head having a curved portion along at least a portion of the width of said head, said head being configured to extend above said arcuate surface of one of said upper and lower surfaces, said first plurality of surface projections being configured for rotation into at least one of the adjacent vertebral bodies; anda second plurality of surface projections, each of said second plurality of surface projections having a sharp edge extending generally along at least a portion of the width of said body, said second plurality of surface projections being configured for rotation into at least one of the adjacent vertebral bodies.
  • 2. The implant of claim 1, wherein said leading end is curved across the width of said implant, said trailing end having a linear portion across the width of said implant.
  • 3. The implant of claim 1, wherein said arcuate surfaces extend across the entire width of said implant.
  • 4. The implant of claim 1, wherein said first plurality of surface projections includes a plurality of posts.
  • 5. The implant of claim 4, wherein said posts are integrally formed with at least one of said upper and lower surfaces.
  • 6. The implant of claim 5, wherein said posts are integrally formed on both of said upper and lower surfaces.
  • 7. The implant of claim 1, wherein said second plurality of surface projections includes threads.
  • 8. The implant of claim 7, wherein said threads extend from at least one of said upper and lower surfaces.
  • 9. The implant of claim 7, wherein said threads extend from both of said upper and lower surfaces.
  • 10. The implant of claim 9, wherein said threads have a frusto-conical outer locus.
  • 11. The implant of claim 1, wherein said body has a substantially circular cross-section perpendicular to the central longitudinal axis.
  • 12. The implant of claim 1, wherein said trailing end includes an engagement area configured to engage an instrument to rotate at least a portion of said implant into the implantation space.
  • 13. The implant of claim 1, wherein each of said upper and lower surfaces include a plurality of recesses.
  • 14. The implant of claim 13, wherein said recesses are in communication with one another.
  • 15. The implant of claim 1, wherein said implant is a spinal fusion implant.
  • 16. The implant of claim 1, in combination with a fusion promoting substance.
  • 17. The implant of claim 1, wherein said implant is at least in part bioabsorbable.
Parent Case Info

The present application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 13/296,125, filed Nov. 14, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,226,652; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/454,393, filed May 18, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,828,800; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/480,908, filed Jun. 7, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,534,254; which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (225)
Number Name Date Kind
350420 Dillon Oct 1886 A
1137585 Craig Apr 1915 A
2065659 Cullen Dec 1936 A
2181746 Siebrandt Nov 1939 A
2243718 De G. Moreira May 1941 A
2372622 Fassio Mar 1945 A
2514665 Myller Jul 1950 A
2537070 Longfellow Jan 1951 A
2543780 Hipps et al. Mar 1951 A
2677369 Knowles May 1954 A
2774350 Cleveland Dec 1956 A
2789558 Rush Apr 1957 A
2806640 Wroblewski Sep 1957 A
2832343 Mose Apr 1958 A
2839815 Reeves et al. Jun 1958 A
2842131 Smith Jul 1958 A
2878809 Treace Mar 1959 A
3128768 Geistauts Apr 1964 A
3177456 Haydu et al. Apr 1965 A
3298372 Feinberg Jan 1967 A
3426364 Lumb Feb 1969 A
3486505 Morrison Dec 1969 A
3604487 Gilbert Sep 1971 A
3605123 Hahn Sep 1971 A
3618611 Urban Nov 1971 A
3709219 Halloran Jan 1973 A
3719186 Merig, Jr. Mar 1973 A
3720959 Hahn Mar 1973 A
3750652 Sherwin Aug 1973 A
3848601 Ma et al. Nov 1974 A
3855638 Pilliar Dec 1974 A
3866510 Eibes et al. Feb 1975 A
3867728 Stubstad et al. Feb 1975 A
3867950 Fischell Feb 1975 A
3875595 Froning Apr 1975 A
3888260 Fischell Jun 1975 A
3892232 Neufeld Jul 1975 A
3905047 Long Sep 1975 A
3915151 Kraus Oct 1975 A
3916907 Peterson Nov 1975 A
3918440 Kraus Nov 1975 A
3942535 Schulman Mar 1976 A
3948262 Zaffaroni Apr 1976 A
3952334 Bokros et al. Apr 1976 A
3987499 Scharbach et al. Oct 1976 A
4003287 Ziaylek, Jr. Jan 1977 A
4016651 Kawahara et al. Apr 1977 A
4027392 Sawyer et al. Jun 1977 A
D245259 Shen Aug 1977 S
4051905 Kleine Oct 1977 A
4059115 Jumashev et al. Nov 1977 A
4070514 Eatherly et al. Jan 1978 A
4082097 Mann et al. Apr 1978 A
4086701 Kawahara et al. May 1978 A
4124026 Berner et al. Nov 1978 A
4142517 Stavropoulos et al. Mar 1979 A
4168326 Broemer et al. Sep 1979 A
4175555 Herbert Nov 1979 A
4177524 Grell et al. Dec 1979 A
4181457 Holmes Jan 1980 A
4197850 Schulman et al. Apr 1980 A
4206516 Pilliar Jun 1980 A
4222128 Tomonaga et al. Sep 1980 A
D257511 Zahn Nov 1980 S
4232679 Schulman Nov 1980 A
4237948 Jones et al. Dec 1980 A
4258716 Sutherland Mar 1981 A
4259072 Hirabayashi et al. Mar 1981 A
4262369 Roux Apr 1981 A
4271832 Evans et al. Jun 1981 A
D260525 Lassiter Sep 1981 S
4289123 Dunn Sep 1981 A
4293962 Fuson Oct 1981 A
4309777 Patil Jan 1982 A
4328593 Sutter et al. May 1982 A
4333469 Jeffcoat et al. Jun 1982 A
4341206 Perrett et al. Jul 1982 A
4349921 Kuntz Sep 1982 A
4356572 Guillemin et al. Nov 1982 A
4401112 Rezaian Aug 1983 A
4405319 Cosentino Sep 1983 A
4414979 Hirshorn et al. Nov 1983 A
4423721 Otte et al. Jan 1984 A
4439152 Small Mar 1984 A
4450834 Fischer May 1984 A
4484570 Sutter et al. Nov 1984 A
4492226 Belykh et al. Jan 1985 A
4497320 Nicholson et al. Feb 1985 A
4501269 Bagby Feb 1985 A
4507115 Kambara et al. Mar 1985 A
RE31865 Roux Apr 1985 E
4530360 Duarte Jul 1985 A
4535374 Anderson et al. Aug 1985 A
4535485 Ashman et al. Aug 1985 A
4542539 Rowe, Jr. et al. Sep 1985 A
4545374 Jacobson Oct 1985 A
4547390 Ashman et al. Oct 1985 A
4549547 Brighton et al. Oct 1985 A
4552200 Sinha et al. Nov 1985 A
4553273 Wu Nov 1985 A
4554914 Kapp et al. Nov 1985 A
D281814 Pratt et al. Dec 1985 S
4570623 Ellison et al. Feb 1986 A
4570624 Wu Feb 1986 A
4592346 Jurgutis Jun 1986 A
4599086 Doty Jul 1986 A
4600000 Edwards Jul 1986 A
4602638 Adams Jul 1986 A
4604995 Stephens Aug 1986 A
4608052 Van Kampen et al. Aug 1986 A
4611581 Steffee Sep 1986 A
4619264 Singh Oct 1986 A
4628921 Rousso Dec 1986 A
4634720 Dorman et al. Jan 1987 A
4636217 Ogilvie et al. Jan 1987 A
4636526 Dorman et al. Jan 1987 A
4645503 Lin et al. Feb 1987 A
4653486 Coker Mar 1987 A
4655777 Dunn Apr 1987 A
4661536 Dorman et al. Apr 1987 A
4664567 Edwards May 1987 A
4665920 Campbell May 1987 A
4677883 Lee Jul 1987 A
4677972 Tornier Jul 1987 A
4693721 Ducheyne Sep 1987 A
4696290 Steffee Sep 1987 A
4698375 Dorman et al. Oct 1987 A
4710075 Davison Dec 1987 A
4713004 Linkow et al. Dec 1987 A
4714469 Kenna Dec 1987 A
4721103 Freedland Jan 1988 A
4736738 Lipovsek et al. Apr 1988 A
4743256 Brantigan May 1988 A
4743260 Burton May 1988 A
4759766 Buettner-Janz et al. Jul 1988 A
4759769 Hedman et al. Jul 1988 A
4769881 Pedigo et al. Sep 1988 A
4781591 Allen Nov 1988 A
4790303 Steffee Dec 1988 A
4805602 Puno et al. Feb 1989 A
4820305 Harms et al. Apr 1989 A
4830000 Shutt May 1989 A
4834757 Brantigan May 1989 A
4848327 Perdue Jul 1989 A
4851008 Johnson Jul 1989 A
4863476 Shepperd Sep 1989 A
4863477 Monson Sep 1989 A
4865603 Noiles Sep 1989 A
4877020 Vich Oct 1989 A
4878915 Brantigan Nov 1989 A
4903882 Long Feb 1990 A
4904260 Ray et al. Feb 1990 A
4904261 Dove et al. Feb 1990 A
4911718 Lee et al. Mar 1990 A
4913144 Del Medico Apr 1990 A
4936848 Bagby Jun 1990 A
4943291 Tanguy Jul 1990 A
4955885 Meyers Sep 1990 A
4955908 Frey et al. Sep 1990 A
4957495 Kluger Sep 1990 A
4960420 Goble et al. Oct 1990 A
4961740 Ray et al. Oct 1990 A
4968316 Hergenroeder Nov 1990 A
4969888 Scholten et al. Nov 1990 A
4987904 Wilson Jan 1991 A
5015247 Michelson May 1991 A
5015255 Kuslich May 1991 A
5026373 Ray et al. Jun 1991 A
5030236 Dean Jul 1991 A
5055104 Ray Oct 1991 A
5059193 Kuslich Oct 1991 A
5062845 Kuslich et al. Nov 1991 A
5071437 Steffee Dec 1991 A
5084050 Draenert Jan 1992 A
5102414 Kirsch Apr 1992 A
5108422 Green et al. Apr 1992 A
5112336 Krevolin et al. May 1992 A
5116304 Cadwell May 1992 A
5122130 Keller Jun 1992 A
5123926 Pisharodi Jun 1992 A
5133755 Brekke Jul 1992 A
5171278 Pisharodi Dec 1992 A
5192327 Brantigan Mar 1993 A
5246458 Graham Sep 1993 A
5258031 Salib et al. Nov 1993 A
5263953 Bagby Nov 1993 A
5279292 Baumann et al. Jan 1994 A
5282861 Kaplan Feb 1994 A
5292252 Nickerson et al. Mar 1994 A
5306309 Wagner et al. Apr 1994 A
5314427 Goble et al. May 1994 A
5324295 Shapiro Jun 1994 A
5352229 Goble et al. Oct 1994 A
5360430 Lin Nov 1994 A
5364399 Lowery et al. Nov 1994 A
5370662 Stone et al. Dec 1994 A
5370697 Baumgartner Dec 1994 A
5393036 Sheridan Feb 1995 A
RE34871 McGuire et al. Mar 1995 E
5396880 Kagan et al. Mar 1995 A
5397359 Mittelmeier et al. Mar 1995 A
5397364 Kozak et al. Mar 1995 A
5425772 Brantigan Jun 1995 A
5435723 O'Brien Jul 1995 A
5443514 Steffee Aug 1995 A
5458638 Kuslich et al. Oct 1995 A
5489307 Kuslich et al. Feb 1996 A
5489308 Kuslich et al. Feb 1996 A
5571109 Bertagnoli Nov 1996 A
5571189 Kuslich Nov 1996 A
5669909 Zdeblick et al. Sep 1997 A
5683463 Godefroy et al. Nov 1997 A
5766252 Henry et al. Jun 1998 A
5782919 Zdeblick et al. Jul 1998 A
D397439 Koros et al. Aug 1998 S
5800547 Schafer et al. Sep 1998 A
5904424 Schwesinger et al. May 1999 A
5906616 Pavlov et al. May 1999 A
6118043 Nies et al. Sep 2000 A
7534254 Michelson May 2009 B1
7828800 Michelson Nov 2010 B2
8057475 Michelson Nov 2011 B2
20020138144 Michelson Sep 2002 A1
20050216090 O'Driscoll et al. Sep 2005 A1
20120053695 Michelson Mar 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (45)
Number Date Country
1 961 531 Jul 1970 DE
24 46 039 Apr 1975 DE
29 10 627 Sep 1980 DE
31 01 333 Dec 1981 DE
31 32 520 Jun 1982 DE
35 05 567 Jun 1986 DE
36 08 163 Sep 1987 DE
41 04 359 Aug 1992 DE
43 02 397 Jul 1993 DE
0 077 159 Apr 1983 EP
0 162 005 Nov 1985 EP
0 179 695 Apr 1986 EP
0 260 044 Mar 1988 EP
0 303 241 Feb 1989 EP
0 307 241 Mar 1989 EP
0 499 465 Aug 1992 EP
0 551 187 Jul 1993 EP
0 577 179 Jan 1994 EP
0 599 419 Jun 1994 EP
0 732 093 Sep 1996 EP
283078 May 1985 ES
2 295 729 Jul 1976 FR
2 581 336 Nov 1986 FR
2 703 580 Oct 1994 FR
1 291 470 Oct 1972 GB
1 492 990 Nov 1977 GB
1 531 487 Nov 1978 GB
2 076 657 Dec 1981 GB
2 083 754 Mar 1982 GB
2 126 094 Mar 1984 GB
2 164 277 Mar 1986 GB
57-29348 Feb 1982 JP
60-31706 Feb 1985 JP
60-43984 Mar 1985 JP
61-122859 Jun 1986 JP
62-155846 Jul 1987 JP
106 101 Jul 1939 SE
1107854 Aug 1984 SU
1124960 Nov 1984 SU
1217374 Mar 1986 SU
1222254 Apr 1986 SU
WO 8401298 Apr 1984 WO
WO 9106266 May 1991 WO
WO 9214423 Sep 1992 WO
WO 9301771 Feb 1993 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (53)
Entry
Adams, et al.; Outline of Orthopaedics, Eleventh Edition; Trunk and Spine, p. 194.
Herkowitz, et al.; Principles of Bone Fusion; The Spine, Third Edition; Chapter 44, p. 1739.
Muschler, et al.; The Biology of Spinal Fusion; Spinal Fusion Science and Technique, Cotler and Cotler, pp. 9-13.
Zindrick, et al.; Lumbar Spine Fusion: Different Types and Indications; The Lumbar Spine, vol. 1, Second Edition, pp. 588-593 (1996).
Gillingham, F.J., et al.; Automatic Patient Monitoring in the Ward; Brit. J. Surg., vol. 53, No. 10, pp. 864-866 (Oct. 1966).
Maloney, A.F.J., et al.; Clinical and Pathological Observations in Fatal Head Injuries, Brit. J. Surg., vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 23-31 (Jan. 1969).
Harris, P., et al.; Spinal Deformity After Spinal Cord Injury; Paraplegia, vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 232-238 (Feb. 1969).
Gillingham, F.J., et al.; Head injuries; Proceedings of the 18th World Congress of the International College of Surgeons, Rome, pp. 68-71 (May 28-31, 1972).
Whatmore, W. J.; Sincipital Encephalomeningoceles; Brit. J. Surg., vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 261-270 (Apr. 1973).
Whatmore, W. J.; Meningioma Following Trauma; Brit. J. Surg., vol. 60, No. 6, pp. 496-498 (Jun. 1973).
Bagby, George W.; Wobbler Syndrome in Horses (the Ataxic Horse); Spokane County Medical Society Bulletin; Spring 1979.
Rathke, F.W., et al.; Surgery of the Spine; Atlas of Orthopaedic Operations, vol. 1, p. 137, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia (1979).
Albrektsson, T., et al.; Osseointegrated Titanium Implants; Acta. Orthop. Scand.; vol. 52:155-170 (1981).
Raveh, J., et al.; Neue Rekonstruktionsmoglichkeiten des Unterkiefers bei knochernen Defekten nach Tumorresektionen; Der Chirurg vol. 53:459-467 (1982).
Crock, H. V.; Practice of Spinal Surgery; Springer-Verlag/Wien, New York (1983).
DeBowes, R.M., et al.; Study of Bovine . . . Steel Baskets; Transactions of the 29th Annual Meeting; Orthopaedic Research Society, vol. 8, p. 407, Mar. 8-10 (1983).
O'Neill, P., et al.; Spinal Meningoceles in Association with Neurofibromatosis; Neurosurgery, vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 82-84 (Jul. 1983).
Brandt, L., et al.; A Dowel Inserter for Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion; J. Neurosurg. 61:793-794 (Oct. 1984).
Whatmore, W.J., et al.; The Coventry Cervical Spreader and Dowel Inserter; ACTA Neurochirurgica, vol. 70, FASC. 1-2 (1984).
Raveh, J., et al.; Use of the Titanium-coated Hollow Screw and Reconstruction Plate System in Bridging of Lower Jaw Defects; J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 42:281-294 (1984).
Otero-Vich, Jose M.; Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion with Threaded Cylindrical Bone; J. Neurosurg 63:750-753 (Nov. 1985).
Morscher, E., et al.; Die vordere Verplattung der Halswirbelsäule mit dem Hohlschrauben-Plattensystem aus Titanium, Der Chirurg, vol. 57, pp. 702-707 (1986) with English Translation.
Bagby, G.W.; Basket Implant Facilitates Spinal Fusion; Orthopedics Today, vol. 7, No. 10, (Oct. 1987).
Butts, M. K., et al.; Biomechanical Analysis of a New Method for Spinal Interbody Fixation; 1987 Symposium, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, “Advances in Bioengineering”, Boston, MA (Dec. 13-18, 1987).
Crawley et al.; A Modified Cloward's Technique for Arthrodesis of the Normal Metacarpophalangeal Joint in the Horse; Veterinary Surgery, vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 117-127 (1988).
Raveh, J., et al.; Surgical Procedures for Reconstruction of the Lower Jaw Using the Titanium-Coated Hollow-Screw Reconstruction Plate System: Bridging of Defects; Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America; vol. 20, No. 3 (Aug. 1987).
Whatmore, W. J.; Proceedings of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons; Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 50:1093-1100 (1987).
Goldthwaite, N., et al.; Toward Percutaneous Spine Fusion; Ch. 45; Lumbar Spine Surgery; C.V. Mosby Company, pp. 512-522 (1987).
Bagby, G.W.; Arthrodesis by the Distraction-Compression Method Using a Stainless Steel Implant; Orthopedics, vol. II, No. 6, pp. 931-934 (Jun. 1987).
Itoman, M., et al.; Banked Bone Grafting for Bone Defect Repair—Clinical Evaluation of Bone Union and Graft Incorporation; J. Jpn. Orthop. Assoc. 62:461-469 (1988).
Kane, W.J.; Direct Current Electrical Bone Growth Stimulation for Spinal Fusion; Spine, vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 363-365 (Mar. 1988).
The SpF-T Spinal Fusion Stimulator: An Efficacious Adjunct that Meets the Diverse Needs of Spine Patients; EBI Medical Systems; (Aug. 1991).
Schmitz et al.; Performance of Alloplastic Materials and Design of an Artificial Disc; The Artificial Disc, Brock, Mayer, Weigel; pp. 23-34 (1991).
The Use of Direct Current for Electrically Induced Osteogenesis; The Positive Effect of an Electronegative charge on Bone Growth; EBI Medical Systems (Feb. 1993).
Mylonas, C., et al.; Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Using the Coventry Cervical Spreader and Dowel Inserter; British Journal of Neurosurgery, 7:545-549 (1993).
Fusion of the Lumbar Spine; Anterior Monosegmental Fusion L5-S1, Atlas of Spinal Operations, Thieme, pp. 270-274 (1993).
Spine Basics, Danek Group, Inc., Glossary (1993).
Lumbar Spine Surgery, Techniques & Complications; History of Lumbar Spine Surgery (1994) pp. 11-15; 27; 30; 35-45; 265-268.
European Search Report dated Aug. 4, 1999.
Cloward, Ralph B.; Sugical Techniques for Lumbar Disc Lesions; Codman; Signature Series 3.
Cloward, Ralph B.; Ruptured Cervical Intervertebral Discs: Removal of Disc & Osteophytes & Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion (A.C.I.F.); Codman; Signature Series 4.
Cloward, Ralph B.; Recent Advances in Surgery of the Cervical Spine; pp. 285-293; German Society for Neurosurgery: vol. 2 Cervical Spine Operations; Excerpta Medica.
Hutter, Charles George; Spinal Stenosis and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion; pp. 103-114; Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research; No. 193; The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.
Lin, Paul M.; Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion; pp. 114-122; Charles C. Thomas; Springfield, Illinois.
Lin, Paul M.; Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Principles and Techniques in Spine Surgery; Techniques and Complications; pp. 81, 98, 120, 146, 173, 180-184, 204, 224, 225, 231; Aspen Publishers, Inc.; 1989.
Tan, S.B.; A Modified Technique of Anterior Lumbar Fusion with Femoral Cortical Allograft; pp. 83-93; The Journal of Orthopaedic Surgical Techniques, vol. 5, No. 3, 1990.
Muller, M.E.; Manual of Internal Fixation: Techniques Recommended by the AO Group; Second Edition, Expanded and Revised; pp. 3-20, 27-41, 53-58, 71-78, 94, 311, 320; Springer-Verlag; 1979.
Hierholzer, G.; Manual on the AO/ASIF Tubular External Fixator; pp. 85-91; Springer-Verlag; 1985.
Heim, Urs; Small Fragment Set Manual: Technique Recommended by the ASIF-Group; pp. 5-7, 10, 20, 21, 30; Springer-Verlag; 1974.
Harmon, Paul H.; Anterior Excision and Vertebral Body Fusion Operation for Intervertebral Disk Syndromes of the Lower Lumbar Spine: Three-to Five-Year Results in 244 Cases; pp. 107-127; Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 26, J.B. Lippincott.
Harmon, Paul H.; A Simplified Surgical Technic for Anterior Lumbar Diskectomy and Fusion; Avoidance of Complications; Anatomy of the Retroperitoneal Veins; pp. 130-143; Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 37, J.B. Lippincott Company, 1964.
Bullough, Peter G.; Atlas of Spinal Diseases; Figure 5.7; J.B. Lippencott Company; 1988.
Canale, S. Terry; Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics; vol. 3, 9th Edition; pp. 2191, 2216, 2459; Mosby, 1998.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120290092 A1 Nov 2012 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 13296125 Nov 2011 US
Child 13555935 US
Parent 12454393 May 2009 US
Child 13296125 US
Parent 08480908 Jun 1995 US
Child 12454393 US