The present invention relates generally to devices, methods, systems and techniques for repairing and/or stabilizing the spine and/or other bones of a patient during spinal surgery.
At times, the source of a patient's back pain may not be clear. Among possible causes for such pain are disease, degradation and/or injury to the spinal bones and/or discs of the spine, as well as to various ancillary structures such as the lamina and/or associated facet joints. While spinal fusion and/or disc arthroplasty procedures have been successful in treating spinal joints to reduce pain, such treatments are often limited in their efficacy, often fuse or immobilize portions or a patient's spine, and are often unable to address and/or correct severe spinal deformities, including spinal dislocations and/or curvature abnormalities such as juvenile and/or adult scoliosis. Therefore, a motion preserving joint replacement system is needed that can reduce and/or correct severe spinal deformities while replacing all or part of the function of the spinal disc and/or associated spinal structures.
In various embodiments, surgical methods and techniques are described wherein portions of a patient's spinal bones may be shaped, shaved, resected and/or removed, including portions of a vertebral endplate and/or pedicular portion(s) (and/or associated structures), with at least one or more portions of the pedicle retained to provide at least partial support for a prosthetic system that is implanted between the upper and lower vertebrae.
In various embodiments, the prosthetic system can comprise an upper joint component and a lower joint component. The upper joint component can comprise an upper contact surface and an upper articulation surface, and the lower joint component can comprise a lower contact surface and a lower articulation surface configured to movably engage the upper articulation surface to form an articulating joint. The articulating joint is adapted for implantation within a disc space between the upper and lower vertebrae, allowing the upper and lower vertebrae to move relative to one another. The lower joint component will also desirably include a support or bridge component extending posteriorly from the disc space, with at least a portion of the bridge component including an outer surface which abuts and/or engages with at least a portion of a pedicle and/or portions of the vertebral arch.
In another embodiment, a prosthetic system for implantation between upper and lower vertebrae comprises an upper joint component having an upper contact surface and an upper articulation surface. The system further has a lower joint component comprising a lower contact surface and a lower articulation surface configured to movably engage the upper articulation surface to form an articulating joint. The articulating joint is configured for implantation within a disc space between the upper and lower vertebrae, allowing the upper and lower vertebrae to move relative to one another. The lower joint component can further include a posterior support which extends from a posterior aspect of the lower joint component, the posterior support including at least one fixation element for securing the lower joint component to the lower vertebrae.
In still another embodiment, a surgical method comprises non-invasively imaging at least upper and lower vertebral bodies of a patient's spine, and then preoperatively planning the surgical removal of some portions of an endplate and one or more pedicles of the lower vertebral body to alter, restore and/or correct the alignment between the upper and lower vertebral bodies to a desired and/or more anatomically correct alignment. Surgical removal according to the preoperative plan can be accomplished, which can include removal of the endplate and/or a portion of one or more pedicles of the lower vertebral body, and then insertion of a prosthetic system between the upper and lower vertebrae, wherein the system comprises an upper joint component and a lower joint component, with the lower joint component including a support extending posteriorly from the lower joint component, the posterior support including a surface adapted and configured to fit within at least a remaining portion of one or more pedicles of the lower vertebral body.
In the various embodiments described herein the planning and surgical corrections to the spinal alignment can include alterations to the lordotic curvature of the patient's spine, alterations to the lateral curvature of the patient's spine (i.e., to address scoliosis, for example), and/or various combinations thereof. If desired, a surgical correction to a specific region of the spine may result in a more-normal anatomical alignment of the affected segment, or the surgical correction may result in an alignment that is further away from the natural alignment (such as where the treated segment desirably compensates for other misaligned levels that may not be surgically treated). In various embodiments, the anatomical imaging, analysis, approach, vertebral preparation, implant preparation and/or placement can be accomplished with the aid of surgical navigation and/or robotic guidance. Due to the complex nature of the preoperative planning and/or execution, these tools may be particularly well suited for the present invention to allow execution of the plan in the operative environment.
The foregoing and other objects, aspects, uses, features, and advantages of embodiments will become more apparent and may be better understood by referring to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Various features of the present invention include the recognition of a need for a more effective and versatile system of addressing spinal disease and deformities, including the correction and/or alteration of spinal levels using a motion preserving construct. A variety of configurations, sizes and shapes of such components and associated tools can be utilized in diverse anatomical regions, including use in spinal surgery as well as other anatomical locations. In various medical applications, the disclosed components and related surgical tools and techniques can desirably facilitate the treatment of various types of bone disease and/or damage by surgeons, which can be important to achieve the most accurate and best implant performance and/or fit, as well as facilitate patient recovery.
This specification describes novel systems, devices and methods to treat spinal fractures. Aspects of the present invention will be described with regard to the treatment of vertebral bodies at the lumbar and/or thoracic levels. It should be appreciated, however, that various aspects of the present invention may not limited in their application to thoracic or lumbar injuries. The systems and methods may be applicable to the treatment of fractures in diverse bone types. Embodiments will now be described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. It should be understood that the figures are not necessarily to scale.
The present disclosure relates generally to systems and methods for spinal surgery and, more particularly in some embodiments, to spinal arthroplasty systems and methods for posterior implantation. For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to embodiments or examples illustrated in the drawings, and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. Any alteration and further modifications in the described embodiments, and any further applications of the principles of the invention as described herein are contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the disclosure relates.
Referring first to
Referring now to
In various embodiments, the use of robotics and/or computer guided surgical platforms (and/or computer-aided navigation) are contemplated herein, including in the planning and/or execution stages of the surgery.
Referring now to
As defined herein, a “spherical” shaped surface could include any curved surface having a uniform radius of curvature and may refer to a spherical cap or a segment of a sphere. In various alternative embodiments, non-spherical curved surfaces may function as articulation surfaces to impart specific limits to the range of motion of the prosthetic device. In still another alternative embodiment, the joint may be inverted with the upper articulation surface having a convex shape and the lower articulation surface having a concave articulation surface
The upper joint component 32 may further include bumpers or motion limiters 40, 42 which in this embodiment are depicted as recessed shoulders. The lower joint component 34 can also include bumpers or motion limiters 44, 46 which in this embodiment are upwardly protruding extensions, spaced apart from the articulation surface 38. As will be described in greater detail below, the pair of motion limiters 40, 44 and the pair of motion limiters 42, 46 may serve to constrain flexion/extension motion to a desirable range, preventing or limiting the dislocation of the joint formed by the articulation surfaces 36, 38. The motion limiters may be shaped to provide a greater or lesser range of flexion/extension motion. For example, a surface on the motion limiter 44 angled away from the articulation surface 38 may permit greater flexion motion than would a motion limiter surface parallel to an axis of the spine.
The upper joint component 32 may further include an outer contact surface 48 for interfacing with the vertebral endplate 18, and the lower joint component 34 may include an outer contact surface 50 for interfacing with the vertebral endplate 24.
The upper joint component 32 may further include an upper keel 52 extending from the outer contact surface 48 and comprising an elongated portion 53 and an elongated portion 54. The elongated portion 54 may be taller than the elongated portion 53 to provide the prosthetic device 30 with greater stability in the hard cortical bone of the outer wall of the vertebral body 14. In this embodiment, the raised keel portion 54 has a sharpened and undercut leading edge 56 to encourage aggressive cutting of a channel in the vertebral body 14 and endplate 18, which could help prevent the device 30 from skiving off the vertebral body 14. In this embodiment, the raised keel portion 54 is approximately one-third the length of the upper keel 52 and extends to the posterior edge of the upper joint component to provide additional stability. In alternative embodiments, the upper keel may be longer or shorter to achieve desired stability. If desired, the lower joint component 34 may include a lower keel 58 extending from the outer contact surface 50.
In various alternative embodiments, the width of the keel may vary. For example, the lower portion of the keel may be narrower than the taller portion of the keel. In other embodiments, the keel may taper or have an undulating wave form. In still another alternative, the keel may be perforated or porous to promote bone ingrowth.
The upper joint component 32 may further include a posterior tab 60 extending upward from the posterior edge of the outer contact surface 48. In this embodiment, the tab 60 may be generally perpendicular or slightly acutely angled relative to the contact surface 48. The tab 60 may be integrally formed with or otherwise abut the posterior end of the upper keel 52. As will be described in greater detail below, the posterior tab 60 may serve as a stop to prevent the device 30 from being inserted too far anteriorly into the intervertebral disc space. The position of the tab 60 may be monitored with fluoroscopy or other visualization methods during surgery to determine the progress of the implantation and to confirm when the device 30 has been completely implanted with the posterior tab 60 in contact with a posterior wall of the vertebral body 14. Because the position of the posterior tab 60 may be fixed relative to a center of rotation of the joint formed by articulation surfaces 36, 38, the location of the posterior tab 60 may serve as an indicator of the location of the center of rotation. After the surgeon has determined the desired location for the center of rotation, the upper joint component 32 may be selected so that as the posterior tab 60 is positioned against the posterior wall of the vertebral body 14, the center of rotation is moved into the desired predetermined location.
The prosthetic device 30 may further include a support or “bridge” component 62, which extends posteriorly from the lower joint component 34. As installed, the bridge component 62 will desirably further extend posteriorly from the intervertebral disc space between the vertebral bodies, with a lower surface that abuts and/or engages with at least a portion of the pedicle 25 to a distal end 64.
The distal end 64 of the bridge 62 may include a connection component 66, which in this embodiment is a passage for accepting a fastener 68. In this embodiment, the fastener 68 is a bone screw, however in alternative embodiments, fasteners such as nails, staples, or other mechanical or chemical fasteners may be suitable. The orientation of the connection component 66 desirably permits the fastener 68 to become inserted extrapedicularly, such that the screw travels a path obliquely angled or skewed away from a central axis defined through a pedicle. The fastener 68 may be threaded across a portion of the pedicle 25 and into the vertebral body 20. Extrapedicular fixation may be any fixation into the pedicle that does not follow a path down a central axis defined generally posterior-anterior through the pedicle. In this embodiment, the screw passes through a wall portion of the pedicle, whereby it may achieve strong cortical fixation. In all embodiments, the fasteners may be at least partially recessed so as not to interfere with articulations, soft tissues, and neural structures.
As installed, the bridge 62 and the fastener 68 may limit excessive movement of the device 30, particularly during flexion/extension motions. Additionally, the bridge 62 may distribute the loads on the lower vertebra V2, reducing any opportunity for subsidence of the lower joint component 34 into the vertebral body.
If desired, the connection component 66 may further include an optional locking clip 70, which in this embodiment is an elastically deformable C-shaped structure which holds the fastener 68 in place, resisting any backward disengagement of the fastener 68, particularly when the joint 12 is in motion. It is understood that in alternative embodiments, the locking clip may be a cap, a clamp, an adhesive, or other suitable mechanical or chemical systems for limiting movement of the fastener 68.
The size and shape of the joint components 32, 34 and the bridge component 62 may be limited by the constraints of a posterior surgical approach. For example, the anterior joint components 32, 34 may be configured to cover a maximum vertebral endplate area to dissipate loads and reduce subsidence while still fitting through the posterior surgical exposure, Kambin's triangle, and other neural elements. To achieve maximum surface coverage, the material of the anterior joint components 32, 34 may extend anteriorly from the articulation surfaces 36, 38, respectively. The width of the bridge component 62 may also be selected to desirably pass through Kambin's triangle and to co-exist with the neural elements, yet provide sufficient cross-sectional area to the pedicle structures for additional support.
In alternative embodiments, the upper and lower joint components may be provided in various heights. For example, the height of the upper component may be increased by manufacturing the component with a thickened contact surface. Likewise, material may be added to increase the overall height of the lower component. Providing the components in a variety of selectable heights may allow the surgeon to create the appropriate tension within the joint to both promote bone growth into the upper and lower components and to achieve a desired range of motion. In still other alternative embodiments, the heights of the upper and lower joint components may increase or decrease along the length of the component to create a desired lordosis or kyphosis. The ability to modify the resulting angle between the upper and lower vertebral contact surfaces may allow the surgeon to address variations among patient anatomies or between levels of the vertebral column, such as at the lumbosacral joint (L5-S1). Allowing the surgeon to vary the height, angulation, and performance of the prosthetic device based on the vertebral level or the patient's anatomy may ensure a better fit and a better prognosis for the patient.
For all of the embodiments described herein, the prosthetic device 30 may be formed of any suitable biocompatible material including metals such as cobalt-chromium alloys, titanium alloys, nickel titanium alloys, and/or stainless steel alloys. Ceramic materials such as aluminum oxide or alumina, zirconium oxide or zirconia, compact of particulate diamond, and/or pyrolytic carbon may also be suitable. Polymer materials may also be used, including any member of the polyaryletherketone (PAEK) family such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK), carbon-reinforced PEEK, or polyetherketoneketone (PEKK); polysulfone; polyetherimide; polyimide; ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE); and/or cross-linked UHMWPE. The various components comprising the prosthetic device 30 may be formed of different materials thus permitting metal on metal, metal on ceramic, metal on polymer, ceramic on ceramic, ceramic on polymer, or polymer on polymer constructions.
In any one of the described embodiments, the bone contacting surfaces of the prosthetic device 30 including contact surfaces 48, 50; keels 52, 58; and bridge 62 may include features or coatings which enhance the fixation of the implanted prosthesis. For example, the surfaces may be roughened such as by chemical etching, bead-blasting, sanding, grinding, serrating, and/or diamond-cutting. All or a portion of the bone contacting surfaces of the prosthetic device 30 may also be coated with a biocompatible and osteoconductive material such as hydroxyapatite (HA), tricalcium phosphate (TCP), and/or calcium carbonate to promote bone in growth and fixation. Alternatively, osteoinductive coatings, such as proteins from transforming growth factor (TGF) beta superfamily, or bone-morphogenic proteins, such as BMP2 or BMP7, may be used. Other suitable features may include spikes, ridges, and/or other surface textures.
The prosthetic device 30 may be installed between the vertebrae V1, V2 as will be described below. The prosthetic device 30 may be implanted into a patient using a posterior transforaminal approach similar to the known TLIF (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion) or PLIF (posterior lumbar interbody fusion) procedures. PLIF style approaches are generally more medial and rely on more retraction of the traversing root and dura to access the vertebral disc space. The space between these structures is known as Kambin's triangle. TLIF approaches are typically more oblique, requiring less retraction of the exiting root, and less epidural bleeding with less retraction of the traversing structures. It is also possible to access the intervertebral space using a far lateral approach, above the position of the exiting nerve root and outside of Kambin's triangle. In some instances, it may be possible to access the intervertebral space via the far lateral without resecting the facets. Furthermore, a direct lateral approach through the psoas is known. This approach avoids the posterior neural elements completely. Embodiments of the current disclosure may adopt any of these common approaches or combinations thereof.
In various embodiments, some or all of the affected disc D1 and surrounding tissue may be removed via the foramina. The superior endplate of the vertebra may be milled, rasped, or otherwise resected to match the profile of the outer contact surface 50 of the lower joint component 34 to normalize stress distributions on the endplate 24, and/or to provide initial fixation prior to bone ingrowth. The preparation of the endplate 24 of vertebra V2 may result in a flattened surface or in surface contours such as pockets, grooves, or other contours that may match corresponding features on the outer contact surface 50. The inferior endplate of the vertebra may be similarly prepared to receive the upper joint component 32 to the extent allowed by the exiting nerve root and the dorsal root ganglia. In various embodiments, the natural facet joint and the corresponding articular processes 16, 22 can be rasped and/or prepared to accommodate and/or support an outer surface of the bridge component 62.
In the embodiment of
The upper joint component 32a may further include an outer contact surface 48a for interfacing with a lower surface of the upper vertebral endplate, and the lower joint component 34a may include an outer contact surface 50a for interfacing with a upper surface of the lower vertebral endplate, the lower vertebral pedicle and/or other surfaces of the lower vertebral body.
The upper joint component 32a may further include an upper keel 300 extending from the outer contact surface 48a and comprising an elongated portion 310. The elongated portion 310 will desirably extend upward from the outer contact surface 48a, to provide the prosthetic device 30a with greater stability in the upper vertebral body. In this embodiment, the upper keel portion 300 may have a sharpened and/or undercut leading edge, if desired. In alternative embodiments, the upper keel may be longer or shorter to achieve desired stability. If desired, the lower joint component 34a may include a lower keel 58a extending from the outer contact surface 50a.
In various alternative embodiments, the width of the keel may vary. For example, the lower portion of the keel may be narrower than the taller portion of the keel. In other embodiments, the keel may taper or have an undulating wave form. In still another alternative, the keel may be perforated or porous to promote bone ingrowth.
In various embodiments, the upper joint component 32a may further include a posterior tab 60a extending upward from the posterior edge of the outer contact surface 48a. In this embodiment, the tab 60a may be generally perpendicular or slightly acutely angled relative to the contact surface 48a. The tab 60a may be integrally formed with or otherwise abut the posterior end of the upper keel 300. In a manner similar to previously described embodiments, the posterior tab 60a may serve as a stop to prevent the device 30a from being inserted too far anteriorly into the intervertebral disc space. The position of the tab 60a may be monitored with fluoroscopy or other visualization methods during surgery to determine the progress of the implantation and to confirm when the device 30a has been completely implanted with the posterior tab 60a in contact with a posterior wall of the vertebral body. Because the position of the posterior tab 60a may be fixed relative to a center of rotation of the joint formed by articulation surfaces 36a and 38a, the location of the posterior tab 60a may serve as an indicator of the location of the center of rotation. After the surgeon has determined the desired location for the center of rotation, the upper joint component 32a may be selected so that as the posterior tab 60a is positioned against the posterior wall of the vertebral body, the center of rotation is moved into the desired predetermined location.
The prosthetic device 30a will desirably further include a support or “bridge” component 62a, which extends posteriorly from the lower joint component 34a. As installed, the bridge component 62a will desirably further extend posteriorly from the intervertebral disc space between the vertebral bodies, with a lower surface that abuts and/or engages with at least a portion of a pedicle (and/or other vertebral structures) to a distal end 64a.
The distal end 64a of the bridge 62a may include a connection component 66a, which in this embodiment is a passage for accepting a fastener 68a. In this embodiment, the fastener 68a is a bone screw, however in alternative embodiments, fasteners such as nails, staples, or other mechanical or chemical fasteners may be suitable. The orientation of the connection component 66a desirably permits the fastener 68a to become inserted extrapedicularly, such that the screw travels a path obliquely angled or skewed away from a central axis defined through a pedicle. The fastener 68a may be threaded across a portion of the pedicle and into the vertebral body. Extrapedicular fixation may be any fixation into the pedicle that does not follow a path down a central axis defined generally posterior-anterior through the pedicle. In this embodiment, the screw may pass through a wall portion of the pedicle and/or vertebral body, whereby it may achieve strong cortical fixation. In all embodiments, the fasteners may be at least partially recessed so as not to interfere with articulations, soft tissues, and neural structures.
As previously noted, alternative embodiments of the upper and lower joint components may be provided in various heights. For example, the height of the upper component may be increased by manufacturing the component with a thickened contact surface. Likewise, material may be added to increase the overall height of the lower component. Providing the components in a variety of selectable heights may allow the surgeon to create the appropriate tension within the joint to both promote bone growth into the upper and lower components and to achieve a desired range of motion and/or spinal alignment. In still other alternative embodiments, the heights of the upper and lower joint components may increase or decrease along the length of the component to create a desired lordosis or kyphosis and/or accommodate a desired surgical resection and/or correction. The ability to modify the resulting angle between the upper and lower vertebral contact surfaces may allow the surgeon to address variations among patient anatomies or between levels of the vertebral column, such as at the lumbosacral joint (L5-S1). Allowing the surgeon to vary the height, angulation, and performance of the prosthetic device based on the vertebral level or the patient's anatomy may ensure a better fit and a better prognosis for the patient.
Exemplary Surgical Procedure
According to at least one embodiment, a first surgical incision for providing access via a bilateral approach is made in the patient's back, and a decompression of the posterior vertebral elements on a first posterior side of the spinal motion unit (i.e., removal of portions of the upper and/or lower facets on the medial side, for example) or other standard bilateral decompression can be accomplished to provide access to the intervertebral disc space. A discectomy can then be accomplished through the access, and a distractor/trial can be placed between the vertebral bodies, with the overlying skin and tissues allowed to relax. A second surgical incision is made to provide access to the opposing (i.e., lateral) side of the spinal motion unit, and then a similar decompression and discectomy can be accomplished through the lateral access.
The surgeon can then rasp, resect and/or otherwise remove portions of the vertebral body, the pedicle and/or other posterior structures of the vertebral body, including portions of the upper endplate of the lower vertebral body, in accordance with the preoperative surgical plan. In various embodiments, a long flat rasp 300 (see
Once one side of the vertebral body and disc space have been prepared in this fashion, a spacer or trial may be placed into the disc space to ensure the vertebral bodies have been properly prepared, that a desired angular correction has been established, and/or that a desired tension of the lateral annulus will be achieved once the final implant has been emplaced. If the trial/spacer appears to properly fit, then the trial/spacer can be removed and replaced with the assembled implant. Once the assembled implant is in a desired position, an anchoring screw or other anchoring device can be inserted through the connection component and secured to the lower vertebral body.
In various embodiments, the long flat rasp or other surgical tool(s) could be attached to a surgical guidance system, allowing a surgeon to view the predicted and/or actual path of the rasp/tool on the targeted anatomy. Various additional steps of the procedure as outlined could be accomplished using a surgical guidance system, with at least one benefit of surgical guidance potentially reducing radiation exposure to the patient and/or operative room personnel while enhancing the accuracy and/or fidelity of the anatomical preparation by matching the preoperative plan with the intraoperative execution in three dimensions.
In other alternative embodiments, the various steps described herein could be accomplished with the aid of a surgical robot, with or without surgical navigation. In one embodiment, the surgical robot could provide haptic feedback to the surgeon, which might desirably notify the surgeon of approaching soft tissues and/or other surgical boundaries. In another embodiment, the robot could provide rigid limits for surgeon activity (i.e., to prevent cutting into delicate tissues, for example). In a third embodiment, the surgical robot could complete surgical steps autonomously (i.e., with or without surgeon intervention). The employment of surgical robots as outlined could potentially reduce radiation exposure to the patient and/or operative room personnel while enhancing the accuracy and/or fidelity of the anatomical preparation by matching the preoperative plan with the intraoperative execution in three dimensions.
Once one side of the vertebral body has been treated in the previous manner, the same approach can be repeated on the other side of the vertebral body, including trialing and placement of the final implant. One particularly advantageous feature of the present invention is that the disclosed technique allows a surgeon to trial and “balance” the medial and lateral annulus for proper tension/laxity, in a manner similar to balancing of a knee implant. Such balancing, which is not currently possible using existing devices and surgical techniques, can significantly improve the stability and performance of the spinal implant, and can also contribute greatly to device function and durability, as well as significantly reduced patient pain and/or recovery time, leading to increased patient satisfaction with this procedure.
In use, the guide 400 can be attached to a placement tool 470 (see
A rasp 500 can then be inserted into an upper channel 510 of the guide 400 (see
A long rasp 600 can then be inserted into a lower channel 610 of the guide 400, with the rasp used to cut and prepare the lower vertebral endplate, pedicle and/or other vertebral structures (see
Spinal Fusion Implants
In various embodiments, a spinal fusion device may be implanted into a functional spinal unit for a variety of reasons, including to restore stability to a significantly degraded and/or unstable spinal level.
The entire disclosure of each of the publications, patent documents, and other references referred to herein is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes to the same extent as if each individual source were individually denoted as being incorporated by reference.
The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The foregoing embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects illustrative rather than limiting on the invention described herein. Scope of the invention is thus intended to include all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the descriptions provided herein.
Many of the aspects and advantages of the present invention may be more clearly understood and appreciated by reference to the accompanying drawings. The accompanying drawings are incorporated herein and form a part of the specification, illustrating embodiments of the present invention and together with the description, disclose the principles of the invention.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in light of the teachings of this invention that certain changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure herein. What have been described above are examples of the present invention. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the present invention, but one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the present invention are possible. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of, and claims priority to, U.S. application Ser. No. 15/955,611, filed on Apr. 17, 2018, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/712,046, filed on Sep. 21, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/486,065, filed on Sep. 15, 2014, which in turn is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/839,821, filed on Aug. 16, 2007, which claims priority from U.S. application Ser. No. 11/757,084, filed on Jun. 1, 2007, the disclosures of which are each incorporated herein by reference. This application further claims the benefit, through U.S. application Ser. No. 15/955,611, of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/486,329 entitled “HHALL Osteotomy,” filed Apr. 17, 2017, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/654,963 entitled “Spinal Osteotomy,” filed Apr. 9, 2018, the disclosures of which are each incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3320951 | Wittebol | May 1967 | A |
3510883 | Cathcart, III | May 1970 | A |
3740769 | Haboush | Jun 1973 | A |
3903549 | Deyerle | Sep 1975 | A |
4309777 | Patil | Jan 1982 | A |
4349921 | Kuntz | Sep 1982 | A |
4470158 | Pappas et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4550450 | Kinnett | Nov 1985 | A |
4622959 | Marcus | Nov 1986 | A |
4653487 | Maale | Mar 1987 | A |
4681589 | Tronzo | Jul 1987 | A |
4697582 | William | Oct 1987 | A |
4697586 | Gazale | Oct 1987 | A |
4702930 | Heide et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4743262 | Tronzo | May 1988 | A |
4759766 | Buettner-Janz | Jul 1988 | A |
4759769 | Hedman et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4805607 | Englehardt et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4836196 | Park et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4874389 | Downey | Oct 1989 | A |
4875474 | Border | Oct 1989 | A |
4892545 | Day et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4946378 | Hirayama | Apr 1990 | A |
4932975 | Main et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4997432 | Keller | Mar 1991 | A |
5004476 | Cook | Apr 1991 | A |
5037438 | Davidson | Aug 1991 | A |
5062850 | MacMillan et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5071437 | Steffee | Dec 1991 | A |
5092866 | Breard | Mar 1992 | A |
5108442 | Smith | Apr 1992 | A |
5122130 | Keller | Jun 1992 | A |
5258031 | Salib et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271737 | Baldwin et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5282863 | Burton | Feb 1994 | A |
5282868 | Bahler | Feb 1994 | A |
5290312 | Kojimoto et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5314477 | Marnay | May 1994 | A |
5344458 | Bonutti | Sep 1994 | A |
5387213 | Breard et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5401269 | Buttner-Janz et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415661 | Holmes | May 1995 | A |
5423825 | Levine | Jun 1995 | A |
5425773 | Boyd et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5443513 | Moumene et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443515 | Cohen et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5507816 | Bullivant | Apr 1996 | A |
5509934 | Cohen | Apr 1996 | A |
5534029 | Shima | Jul 1996 | A |
5534030 | Navarro et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5554191 | Lahille et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5554194 | Sanders | Sep 1996 | A |
5556431 | Buttner-Janz | Sep 1996 | A |
5562660 | Grob | Oct 1996 | A |
5562737 | Graf | Oct 1996 | A |
5562738 | Boyd et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571109 | Bertangoli | Nov 1996 | A |
5571190 | Ulrich et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591235 | Kuslich | Jan 1997 | A |
5607425 | Rogozinski | Mar 1997 | A |
5609638 | Price et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5683465 | Shinn et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5658347 | Sarkisian et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5672175 | Martin | Sep 1997 | A |
5674294 | Bainville | Oct 1997 | A |
5674296 | Bryan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676701 | Yuan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5702450 | Bisserie | Dec 1997 | A |
5702469 | Whipple et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5728098 | Sherman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5752957 | Ralph et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755811 | Tanamal et al. | May 1998 | A |
5772661 | Michelson | Jun 1998 | A |
5800547 | Shafer et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824093 | Ray et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824094 | Serhan et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5888222 | Coates et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5895428 | Berry | Apr 1999 | A |
5899941 | Nishijima et al. | May 1999 | A |
RE36221 | Breard et al. | Jun 1999 | E |
5928284 | Mehdizadeh | Jul 1999 | A |
5961516 | Graf | Oct 1999 | A |
6010502 | Bagby | Jan 2000 | A |
6019792 | Cauthen | Feb 2000 | A |
6039763 | Shelokov | Mar 2000 | A |
6042582 | Ray | Mar 2000 | A |
RE36758 | Fitz | Jun 2000 | E |
6096080 | Nicholson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102954 | Albrektsson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106557 | Robioneck et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113637 | Gill et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6113638 | Williams et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132464 | Martin | Oct 2000 | A |
6146421 | Gordon et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156067 | Bryan et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159211 | Boriani et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159214 | Michelson | Dec 2000 | A |
6159244 | Suddaby | Dec 2000 | A |
6174311 | Branch et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179874 | Cauthen | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179875 | Strempel | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190414 | Young et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193757 | Foley et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200322 | Branch et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6224599 | Baynham et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6224607 | Michelson | May 2001 | B1 |
6228118 | Gordon | May 2001 | B1 |
6231609 | Mehdizadeh | May 2001 | B1 |
6235059 | Benezech et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238396 | Lombardo | May 2001 | B1 |
6251112 | Jackson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251140 | Marino et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264655 | Pisharodi | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277122 | McGahan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6325827 | Lin | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6368350 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368353 | Arcand | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375681 | Truscott | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387130 | Stone et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402750 | Atkinson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402785 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409766 | Brett | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413278 | Marchosky | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419703 | Fallin et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419705 | Erickson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432140 | Lin | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440139 | Michelson | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6440168 | Cauthen | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454807 | Jackson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6471724 | Zdeblick et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6514260 | Zdeblick et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517580 | Ramadan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524312 | Landry et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6527804 | Gauchet et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540747 | Marino | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6540785 | Gill et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6562074 | Gerbec et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6565571 | Jackowski et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6565574 | Michelson | May 2003 | B2 |
6565605 | Goble et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6572653 | Simonson | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579319 | Goble et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6582466 | Gauchet | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582468 | Gauchet | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589247 | McGahan et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599291 | Foley et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6607557 | Brosnahan et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6610065 | Branch et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6610091 | Reiley | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6610093 | Pisharodi | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6641582 | Hanson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6641614 | Wagner et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648895 | Burkus et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6669729 | Chin | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6679915 | Cauthen | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685742 | Jackson | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6692495 | Zacouto | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6699247 | Zucherman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709458 | Michelson | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6733532 | Gauchet et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6740118 | Eisermann et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6743255 | Ferree | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749635 | Bryan | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6780186 | Errrico et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6805714 | Sutcliffe | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6811567 | Reily | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6908484 | Zubok et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6936071 | Marnay et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6949123 | Reily | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6958077 | Suddaby | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6966929 | Mitchell | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6984245 | McGahan et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986772 | Michelson | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994727 | Khandkar et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7025787 | Bryan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7044971 | Suddaby | May 2006 | B2 |
7052515 | Simonson | May 2006 | B2 |
7066960 | Dickman | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7070598 | Lim et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7074240 | Pisharodi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083649 | Zucherman et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7083650 | Moskowitz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090698 | Goble et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7128761 | Kuras et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7137985 | Jahng | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7147665 | Bryan et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
20010005796 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010010021 | Boyd et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010016773 | Serhan et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010016774 | Bresina et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010032020 | Besselink | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034553 | Michelson | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010047207 | Michelson | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049560 | Paul et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020045943 | Uk | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049394 | Roy et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049497 | Mason | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052656 | Michelson | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068976 | Jackson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020068977 | Jackson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077702 | Castro | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095154 | Atkinson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095155 | Michelson | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099444 | Boyd et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107572 | Foley et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116065 | Jackson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123806 | Reiley | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020128712 | Michelson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020128713 | Ferree | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133155 | Ferree | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138143 | Grooms et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138146 | Jackson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143399 | Sutcliffe | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151895 | Soboleski et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151976 | Foley et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156528 | Gau | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161366 | Robie et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169508 | Songer et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183756 | Michelson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004572 | Goble et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004575 | Erickson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009226 | Graf | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028250 | Reiley et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040797 | Fallin et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045939 | Casutt | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055427 | Graf | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074068 | Errico et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078666 | Ralph et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030100949 | Michelson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120348 | Brosnahan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135278 | Eckman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139812 | Garcia et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139813 | Messerli et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030171813 | Kiester | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030176923 | Keller et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191532 | Goble et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199981 | Ferree | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199982 | Bryan | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204259 | Goble et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204260 | Ferree | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204261 | Eisermann et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204271 | Grinberg et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208273 | Eisermann et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233146 | Gringberg et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002712 | Grinberg et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040002761 | Rogers et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040002762 | Hawkins | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006391 | Reiley | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024462 | Ferree et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030390 | Ferree | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030391 | Ferree | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034430 | Falahee | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039385 | Mazda et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039448 | Pisharodi | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049190 | Biedermann et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049272 | Reiley | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049273 | Reiley | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049274 | Reiley | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049275 | Reiley | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049276 | Reiley | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049277 | Reiley | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049278 | Reiley | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049279 | Sevrain | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049281 | Reiley | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068318 | Coates et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073311 | Ferree | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040097931 | Mitchell | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098131 | Bryan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102848 | Michelson | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111161 | Trieu | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040126407 | Falahee | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127991 | Ferree | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133281 | Khandkar et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138749 | Zucherman et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143270 | Zucherman et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143332 | Krueger et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162562 | Martz | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162618 | Mujwid et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176764 | Dant | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176845 | Zubok et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176850 | Zubok et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181284 | Simonson | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181285 | Simonson | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186570 | Rapp | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186576 | Biscup et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186577 | Ferree | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193272 | Zubok et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040220567 | Eisermann et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040220670 | Eisermann et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040220672 | Shadduck | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230307 | Eisermann | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243240 | Beaurain et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243241 | Istephanous et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249461 | Ferree | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249462 | Huang | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254643 | Jackson | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027359 | Mashburn | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033432 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033439 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043800 | Paul et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043802 | Eisermann et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055099 | Ku | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071008 | Kirschman | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075644 | Dipoto et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080488 | Schultz | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113916 | Branch, Jr. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113920 | Foley et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119747 | Fabris Monterumici et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050119753 | McGahan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131540 | Trieu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143820 | Zucherman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149189 | Mokhtar et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149196 | Zucherman et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154461 | Humphreys et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154462 | Zucherman et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154464 | Humphreys et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154465 | Hodges et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154466 | Humphreys et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154467 | Peterman et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159818 | Blain | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165407 | Diaz | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165484 | Ferree | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171608 | Peterman et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171609 | Humphreys et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171610 | Humphreys et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187625 | Wolek et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192671 | Bao et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197702 | Coppes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209698 | Gordon et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216081 | Taylor | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228500 | Kim et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234551 | Fallin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234555 | Sutton et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240270 | Zubock et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251261 | Peterman | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256578 | Blatt et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261773 | Ferree | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261774 | Trieu | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267581 | Marnay et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273178 | Boyan et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277930 | Parsons | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277938 | Parsons | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283237 | Zucherman et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283242 | Zucherman et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004448 | Casey | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009849 | Reiley | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025862 | Villiers et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036325 | Paul et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064170 | Smith et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069437 | Weber | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069438 | Zucherman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069440 | Zucherman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085076 | Krishna et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089717 | Krishna et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095133 | Eisermann et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106459 | Truckai et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116768 | Krueger et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129160 | Liu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142860 | Navarro et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060178744 | De et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178745 | Bartish, Jr. et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060241769 | Gordon et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241771 | Gordon et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247650 | Yerby et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060247769 | Molz et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070050033 | Reo | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050037 | Snell et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055378 | Ankney et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070123884 | Abdou | May 2007 | A1 |
20070270972 | Gordon | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20100298938 | Humphreys | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2552361 | Aug 2005 | CA |
624573 | Aug 1981 | CH |
1713866 | Dec 2005 | CN |
1917832 | Feb 2007 | CN |
2804936 | Aug 1979 | DE |
3023353 | Apr 1983 | DE |
0277282 | Oct 1998 | DE |
20017962 | Jan 2001 | DE |
10135771 | Feb 2003 | DE |
202004015198 | Nov 2004 | DE |
0042271 | Sep 1984 | EP |
0640326 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0677277 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0716840 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0953317 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1281361 | Feb 2003 | EP |
0820731 | May 2003 | EP |
0886506 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1685811 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1711134 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1711137 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1711141 | Oct 2006 | EP |
2676911 | Dec 1992 | FR |
2724108 | Sep 1994 | FR |
2718635 | Oct 1995 | FR |
2742653 | Dec 1995 | FR |
2723841 | Mar 1996 | FR |
2799638 | Apr 2001 | FR |
63145650 | Jun 1988 | JP |
2261446 | Oct 1990 | JP |
10501705 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10286262 | Oct 1998 | JP |
2001511392 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002512079 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002521090 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002528223 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002532142 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003512090 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003515381 | May 2003 | JP |
2003518978 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004514498 | May 2004 | JP |
2004167254 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2005503861 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005515002 | May 2005 | JP |
2005526550 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006500078 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006502274 | Jan 2006 | JP |
1993010725 | Jun 1993 | WO |
1996000049 | Jan 1996 | WO |
1997035529 | Oct 1997 | WO |
1998014142 | Apr 1998 | WO |
1999008627 | Feb 1999 | WO |
1999053871 | Oct 1999 | WO |
2000004851 | Feb 2000 | WO |
2000041654 | Jul 2000 | WO |
2000069351 | Nov 2000 | WO |
2001039678 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2001045576 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2002011650 | Feb 2002 | WO |
2002043603 | Jun 2002 | WO |
2002047586 | Jun 2002 | WO |
2003026522 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2003041618 | May 2003 | WO |
2003045262 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2003059212 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2003084449 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2003101350 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004034935 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004041131 | May 2004 | WO |
2004098465 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005011522 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005025431 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005070354 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005067824 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005070278 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005070349 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005070350 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005070352 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005070353 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005077304 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005094736 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005112835 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2005117725 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006063354 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2007028098 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007087477 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007124467 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT—International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2005/000648, dated Jun. 6, 2005, 12 pages. |
PCT—International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2005/000705, dated Jun. 6, 2005, 17 pages. |
PCT—European Patent Office, International Search Report and International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/US2001/024791, dated Jun. 20, 2002, 8 pages. |
PCT—International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2005/000586, dated Dec. 16, 2005, 17 pages. |
PCT—International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2005/000706, dated Sep. 13, 2005, 19 pages. |
PCT—International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2007/060491, dated Apr. 25, 2007, 8 pages. |
PCT—International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2005/000656, dated Aug. 23, 2005, 12 pages. |
PCT—International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2005/000704, dated Aug. 23, 2005, 17 pages. |
PCT—International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2005/000585, dated Jun. 8, 2005, 12 pages. |
TH. Marnay—Orthopedic Surgeon, Lumbar Intervertebral Arthroplasty—Jun.-Sep. 1991, 15 pages, Kennedy Clinic, U.S.A. (See French article in line item 11). |
TH. Marnay—La Revue De Medecine Orthopedique, L'Arthoplatie Intervertebral Lombaire, No. 25, Jun.-Sep. 1991, 9 pages, Kennedy Clinic, France (same article as line item 10). |
AB Swanson, et al.—The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Unicompartmental and Biocompartmental Arthroplasty of the Knee with a Finned Metal Tibial-Plateau Implant, Oct. 1985, 9 pages, J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1175-1182, Needham, MA. |
David S. Hungerford, M.D., Kenneth A. Krackow, M.D., Robert V. Kenna—Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Approach, 1984, 20 pages, Publisher Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD. |
David S. Hungerford, M.D., and Robert V. Kenna—Preliminary Experience with a Total Knee Prosthesis with Pourous Coating Used Without Cement, Jun. 1983, 13 pages, J.B.Lippincott, Co., No. 176, U.S.A. |
T. Hoogland, A.D. Steffe, J.D. Black, A.S. Greenwald—Total Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Replacement: Testing of a New Articulating Spacer in Human Cadaver Spines, Feb. 21-23, 1978, 1 page, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 24th Annual ORS, Dallas, TX. |
Jeanette E. Ahrens, PHD, Alexis P Shelokov, MD, Jeffrey L. Carver, BS—Normal Joint Mobility is Maintained with an Artificial Disc Prosthesis, 1999, Texas Health Research Institute, Plano, Texas. |
Zimmer—The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Jul. 1970, 2 pages, American Volume, vol. 52-A, No. 5, Boston, MA. |
Viscoglioski Bro., LLC, Spine Arthroplasty: Market Potential & Technology Update, Spine Industry Analysis Series, Nov. 2001, 202 pages, U.S.A. |
A.H. Crenshaw—Campbell's Operative Orthopedics, 1987, 11 pages, Seventh Edition, vol. 2, The C.V. Mosby Company, 1987. |
Zimmer—The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Sep. 1971, 2 pages, American Volume, vol. 53-A, No. 6, Boston, MA. |
International Search Authority, European Patent Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Appl. No. PCT/US2008/065504, dated Dec. 1, 2009, 1-11 pgs. |
Australian Patent Office, Patent Examination Report No. 1 for Pat. Appl. 2008259888, dated Sep. 28, 2012, 1-4 pgs. |
European Patent Office, European Search Report for Pat. Appl. No. 18787514.1, dated Dec. 23, 2020, pp. 1-8. |
International Search Authority, United States Patent & Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Appl. No. PCT/US2018/028028, dated Jun. 27, 2018, pp. 1-8. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210059832 A1 | Mar 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62654963 | Apr 2018 | US | |
62486329 | Apr 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11839821 | Aug 2007 | US |
Child | 14486065 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15955611 | Apr 2018 | US |
Child | 17023864 | US | |
Parent | 14486065 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 15712046 | US | |
Parent | 11757084 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 11839821 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15712046 | Sep 2017 | US |
Child | 15955611 | US |