The present invention relates in general to the field of bone fixation, and more particularly, to a novel rod link reducer for use during the correction of mild to severe spinal deformities.
None.
Without limiting the scope of the invention, its background is described in connection with pedicle screws.
In rigid severe spine deformity with coronal or sagittal decompensation, translation of the spinal column is necessary for restoration of trunk balance as well as deformity correction. However, the conventional correction methods, such as posterior correction only or anterior release and posterior instrumentation, are usually unsatisfactory. Therefore, a more aggressive approach, such as reconstructive techniques, is necessary. In 1922, Maclennan1 first illustrated vertebrectomy and demonstrated an apical resection from a posterior-only approach with postoperative casting for the treatment of severe scoliosis. Several authors2-8 have subsequently reported their experience with vetebrectomy, mostly for congenital scoliosis. In 1987, Bradford9 performed both anterior and posterior vertebral column resection (VCR) with spinal shortening and posterior instrumentation and fusion demonstrating excellent restoration of coronal with relatively few complications. Leatherman6 introduced a two-stage anterior and posterior correction procedure for congenital spinal deformity. Bradford and Bochie-Adjei10 also reported a single stage anterior and posterior resection of hemivertebra and spinal arthordesis. However, the anterior-posterior vertebral column resection (VCR) has disadvantages such as long operative time, potential significant blood loss, and risk of intraoperative neurologic impairment due to the spinal column segment instability during the resection and the correction procedure.
In 2002, Suk11-13 introduced a technique of a single posterior approach to perform VCR (PVCR) that offered significant advantages over the combined anterior-posterior VCR. The surgery consisted of temporary stabilization of the vertebral column with segmental pedicle screw fixation, resection of the vertebral column at the apex of the deformity via the posterior route followed by gradual deformity correction and global fusion. In the surgical technique, multiple pedicle screws were utilized proximal and distal to the vertebral resection to securely fix the spine prior to any bony resection. Provisional single rod placement is performed during the bony resection to prevent sudden spinal column translations which may result in spinal cord injury. The vertebral column resection and deformity correction were carried out either by exchanging the temporary precontoured rods one by one or by in situ rod bending. However, these technique have a number of disadvantages: 1) the risk of intraoperative mishaps due to the instability resulting from exchanging the temporary rods may produce spinal cord injury; 2) limitation in deformity correction secondary to a “one-time” correction maneuver utilized using the Suk technique; 3) short segment fixation using the provisional rods since multiple exchanges prevent long rod utilization; and 4) additional surgical time necessary with multiple removal and insertion of the temporary provisional rods.
One such fixation system is taught in U.S. Pat. No. 7,220,262, issued to Hynes. Briefly, the spinal fixation system and related methods include pedicle screws secured in two columns, one along each side of the spine. Cross support rods have ends connected to pedicle screw heads. A longitudinally extending rod is supported on the cross supports and recessed in the cavity created by removal of portions of spinous processes, providing a reduced profile of the installed construct. Several types of cross supports are shown such as: arms from the screws inward to rings or yokes connecting the longitudinal rod; cross rods with ends connected to the screws and having centrally-located yokes for the longitudinal rod; cross rods with articulating longitudinal rod portions fixed or swiveled to them. These cross rods may have end portions angled posterior toward anterior to accommodate lateral positioned pedicle screws, but shorter cross rods without angled end portions enable medialized pedicle screw orientation.
United States Patent Application No. 20070270810, filed by Sanders is directed to a pedicle screw spinal rod connector arrangement. Briefly, a pedicle screw spinal rod connector arrangement is provided that includes in a body having an opening for mounting a head of an inserted pedicle screw. A bracket connected with the body forms a lateral restraint. A bridge is connected with and extends over the body. A spinal rod-receiving slot is provided between the bridge and the bracket. The connector arrangement also has a wedge axially offset from the pedicle screw moveable downward by a setscrew mounted with the bridge. The wedge imparts a locking force on the pedicle screw head and a generally lateral locking force on the spinal rod.
Yet another example is shown in United States Patent Application No. 20070233062, filed by Berry for a pedicle screw system with offset stabilizer rod. In this example, an improved pedicle screw system is provided with an offset stabilizer rod for the internal fixation of the spine. The pedicle screw system includes at least two multi-angle pedicle screw units adapted for anchored securement to patient bone, and an elongated stabilizer rod extending therebetween. Each pedicle screw unit includes a bone screw associated with an anchor bracket defining a laterally offset and upwardly open channel or trough for receiving and supporting the stabilizer rod. A securement member such as a set screw is fastened to the anchor bracket for compressively retaining the stabilizer rod within the bracket channel or trough. The securement member may also bear against the associated bone screw for compressively retaining the screw in position relative to the anchor bracket.
The present invention solves various problems of current spinal fixation systems and the control of the positioning of temporary rod during spinal surgery. The present invention allows the surgeon to stabilize the spine, effectively derotate the spine, safely translate the spine and when required easily derotate and translate the spine to treat spinal deformities.
The present inventors recognized there and other disadvantages of the current implant strategies used during Posterior Vertebral Column Resection (PVCR) by designing a new pedicle screw posterior instrumentation system. The present invention includes screws, methods, kits and systems that provide a safer, easier and better correction, as well as shorter operation time method for the PVCR of the severe spinal deformity. The present invention takes advantage of the top-loading and side-loading current designs as well as a universal connecting link to provide three-dimensional correction. These components provide: 1) continued stabilization of the spine during bony resection as well as correction; 2) allow for controlled correction of the spine using both rods; and 3) provide the ability to place the permanent rods while the long provisional rod is in places so instability is not created.
The present invention includes: 1) a pedicle screw with a screw head that can receive two rods. The bone screw head includes two rod-receivers. One receiver member is basic “U” shape (top-loading component) that extends from the top of the screw head to receive a temporary rod. Another receiver member has a basic “C” shape (side-loading component) that is inferior to the first receiver. The second receiver receives a final rod. There is also a breakaway mechanism between the first and second apertures so that the first aperture can be removed while the final rod is fixed; 2) rod-link reducer has a basic “H” shape that rigidly links and locks the temporary rods, which allows attachment to the rod at any orientation in the coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes so as to make compression, distraction, derotation and cantilever method; 3) reduction handle connects with the rod-link reducer; and 4) 5.5 mm diameter rod. For the PVCR of severe spinal deformity, this instrumentation system would provide: 1) better maintenance of spinal stability throughout the surgical procedure to reduce risk of the spinal cord injuries; 2) more reliable reconstruction of the vertebral column; 3) better and easier correction of the deformity; and 4) shorter operative time.
More particularly, the present invention includes a rod link reducer for a spinal fixation system, the rod link reducer includes a first and a second spinal rod manipulator; a first spinal rod manipulator joint connected to the first spinal rod manipulator and a second spinal rod manipulator joint connected to the second spinal rod manipulator; a first and a second translatable transverse shaft connected to the first and second joints, respectively; and a universal reducer connected to both the first and second translatable transverse shafts, wherein the reducer, the shafts and the linkers provide movement and temporary fixation of a spine that has been manipulated into a final position during spinal surgery. In one aspect, the spinal rod manipulator is further defined as comprising a handle and a rod attachment fixation point, wherein the rod attachment fixation point at least partially surrounds a rod with a semi-permanent fastener. In another aspect, the first, the second or both the first and second translatable transverse shafts connects to the universal reducer and are capable of sliding to increase or decrease the distance between the first and second joints. The universal reducer can be, for example, a ball joint, a universal joint, a pivot, a slot, a collar, a bearing, a dove-tail, a ball-joint, a gimbal, a level, or a sleeve that permits movement of the translatable transverse shafts in two or more dimensions. In another aspect, the universal reducer may also includes a fastener that semi-permanently fixes the position of the reducer in relation to the first, the second or both translatable transverse shafts. The first and second joints may each also includes an independent fastener that semi-permanently fixes the relative position of the first spinal rod manipulator to the first translatable transverse shaft, the second spinal rod manipulator to the second translatable transverse shaft or both the first and second spinal rod manipulator to the first and second translatable transverse shafts, respectively. Any component of the rod link reducer comprises titanium, stainless steel, spring steel, aluminum, Niobium and alloys thereof, carbon fiber, ceramics, polymers, composites or combinations thereof.
In another embodiment, the present invention includes a method of correcting a spinal deformity by fastening two or more pedicle screw into two or more vertebra; interconnecting the pedicle screws with two or more temporary rods; connecting a of link reducer between the temporary rods, the rod link reducer having a first and a second spinal rod manipulator; a first spinal rod manipulator joint connected to the first spinal rod manipulator and a second spinal rod manipulator joint connected to the second spinal rod manipulator; a first and a second translatable transverse shaft connected to the first and second joints, respectively; and a universal reducer connected to both the first and second translatable transverse shafts, wherein the reducer, the shafts and the linkers provide movement and temporary fixation of a spine that has been manipulated into a final position during spinal surgery. Next, the user correct the position of the spine by manipulating the temporary rods attached to the pedicle screws; interconnects the pedicle screws with a permanent fixation rod; and finally removes the temporary rod. One example of a pedicle screw for use with the present invention may include a bone fastener and a rod coupling head, the rod coupling head comprising a lower and an upper rod coupling: the lower rod coupling including a lateral rod opening adapted to receive a permanent rod; an angled bore extends into the lateral rod opening; and a permanent rod fastener in the angled bore to engage a permanent rod in the lateral rod opening; and a upper rod coupling having: an upper rod opening adapted to receive a temporary rod, wherein the upper rod opening is formed to receive a temporary rod fastener, wherein the upper rod coupling is detachable from the lower rod coupling at a transition, wherein a temporary rod is temporarily affixed into the upper rod opening during a bone realignment and a permanent rod is positioned in the lateral rod opening and engaged by the permanent rod fastener upon final bone alignment. In one aspect, the spinal rod manipulator is further defined as comprising a handle and a rod attachment fixation point, wherein the rod attachment fixation point at least partially surrounds a rod with a semi-permanent fastener. In another aspect, the first, the second or both the first and second translatable transverse shafts connects to the universal reducer and are capable of sliding to increase or decrease the distance between the first and second joints. The universal reducer may include a ball joint, a universal joint, a pivot, a slot, a collar, a bearing, a dove-tail, a ball-joint, a gimbal, a level, or a sleeve that permits movement of the translatable transverse shafts in two or more dimensions. In another aspect, the universal reducer further may also include a fastener that semi-permanently fixes the position of the reducer in relation to the first, the second or both translatable transverse shafts. The first and second joints may each include an independent fastener that semi-permanently fixes the relative position of the first spinal rod manipulator to the first translatable transverse shaft, the second spinal rod manipulator to the second translatable transverse shaft or both the first and second spinal rod manipulator to the first and second translatable transverse shafts, respectively.
The present invention also includes a kit that includes a rod link reducer of a spinal fixation system, the rod link reducer having a first and a second spinal rod manipulator; a first spinal rod manipulator joint connected to the first spinal rod manipulator and a second spinal rod manipulator joint connected to the second spinal rod manipulator; a first and a second translatable transverse shaft connected to the first and second joints, respectively; and a universal reducer connected to both the first and second translatable transverse shafts, wherein the reducer, the shafts and the linkers provide movement and temporary fixation of a spine that has been manipulated into a final position during spinal surgery. The kit may also include two or more pedicle screw into two or more vertebra, the pedicle screw including a bone fastener and a rod coupling head, the rod coupling head comprising separate lower and upper lower rod couplings: the lower rod coupling including: a lateral rod opening adapted to receive a permanent rod; an angled bore extends into the lateral rod opening; and a permanent rod fastener in the angled bore to engage a permanent rod in the lateral rod opening; and a upper rod coupling including: an upper rod opening adapted to receive a temporary rod, wherein the upper rod opening is formed to receive a temporary rod fastener; and two or more temporary rod fasteners. The kit may also include at least one of two or more permanent rods, two or more temporary rods, one or more rod link reducers, a plurality of pedicle screws and one or more leverage handles.
For a more complete understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention, reference is now made to the detailed description of the invention along with the accompanying figures and in which:
While the making and using of various embodiments of the present invention are discussed in detail below, it should be appreciated that the present invention provides many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed herein are merely illustrative of specific ways to make and use the invention and do not delimit the scope of the invention.
To facilitate the understanding of this invention, a number of terms are defined below. Terms defined herein have meanings as commonly understood by a person of ordinary skill in the areas relevant to the present invention. Terms such as “a”, “an” and “the” are not intended to refer to only a singular entity, but include the general class of which a specific example may be used for illustration. The terminology herein is used to describe specific embodiments of the invention, but their usage does not delimit the invention, except as outlined in the claims.
Posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) can be used for correction of the most severe spinal deformities. Current implant strategies used for more common and moderate spinal deformity are not ideal for those complex cases. Sure they do not provide continuous stability of the spine as one transition between resection and correction, are cumbersome, and the application of correction forces are not ideal. The new system disclosed herein was designed specifically to surgically treat severe spinal deformity.
The treatment of severe rigid spinal deformity is a demanding and difficult surgical challenge. The PVCR has been considered to be an effective alternative to the conventional anteriorposterior VCR in severe rigid spinal deformity. However, the current implant strategies used during PVCR afford the limited correction, potential risk of spinal cord injuries, and long operative time. This new instrumentation system may offer: 1) better maintenance of spinal stability throughout the surgical procedure to reduce risk of the spinal cord injuries; 2) more reliable reconstruction of the vertebral column; 3) better and easier correction of the deformity; and 4) shorter operative time.
The novel pedicle screw/rod-link reducer posterior instrumentation system was developed to provide a safer, easier and improved deformity correction, as well as shorter surgical time for the PVCR of the severe spinal deformity. Biomechanical evaluation of this system demonstrated spinal stability throughout the surgical procedure to reduce the risk of spinal cord injuries.
The temporary rod/rod-link reducer construct provided similar stiffness and stability compared to the provisional and final rod constructs. This new system may offer a safer, easier and improved deformity correction, as well as shorter surgical time for the PVCR of the severe spinal deformity.
Significance: Current implant strategies used for more common and moderate spinal deformity are not ideal for the most severe spinal deformities. A novel pedicle screw/rod-link reducer has been designed to offer better maintenance of spinal stability throughout the surgical procedure to reduce risk of the spinal cord injuries. This system may therefore provide a safer, easier and improved deformity correction, as well as shorter surgical time for the PVCR of the severe spinal deformity.
Implant Components: The instrumentation system may include one or more of the following components: a pedicle screw, a rod-link reducer, reduction handle, temporary long rod, and final rod. The pedicle screw includes a threaded shank for insertion into the bone and a screw head having a first aperture and a second aperture. The first aperture has a basic “U” (tulip) shape (top-loading component) that extends from the top of the screw head and is open on both sides of the screw head to receive a first longitudinal member (a temporary rod) and a set of female threads formed in the inner walls of the first aperture. A first compression member engages the set of female threads of the first aperture and the face of the first compression member contacts the first longitudinal member. The second aperture has a basic “C” shape (side-loading component) that lines up superior to the threaded shank and inferior to the first aperture. The second aperture is open on both sides of the head to receive a second longitudinal member (a final rod). The second aperture also includes a second set of female threads that accommodate a second compression member that screwably engages the second set of female threads and the face of the second compression member contacts the second longitudinal member. There is a breakaway mechanism between the first and second apertures.
The rod-link reducer has a basic “H” shape that rigidly links and locks the first longitudinal members (temporary rods). The rod-link reducer includes: 1) two top-tightening locking mechanisms (break-off set screws) those provide access ensure the adequate grip on the temporary rods by the set screws; 2) an adjustable central mechanism by functioning in a multi-axial manner, allows attachment to the rod at any orientation in the coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes. The mechanism allows to make compression, distraction, derotation and cantilever method; 3) two adjustable lateral mechanisms (break-off set screws) allow the locking mechanisms adequately to attach the temporary rods; 4) two squared ends those connect with two reduction handles.
The reduction handle is a column shape and has two portion ends. The first end has a squared access that connects with the squared end of the rod-link reducer. The second end is a solid column. The temporary rod and the final rod are the diameter of 5.5 mm rods those are made of stainless steel or titanium.
In operation, the present invention may be used as follows: With the spine exposed posteriorly, the pedicle screws will be inserted segmentally, except for the resected levels (apex). The spine is then divided into cephalad and caudal portions by the resected levels. At the cephalad portion, two temporary rods will be fixed on the convex and concave side via the first aperture of the pedicle screw respectively. Another two temporary rods will be similarly fixed at the caudal portion. The two temporary rods on the concave side will be connected with a rod-link reducer and locked to the shape of the deformity without any attempt at correction. Resection of the vertebral column will be performed at the convex side of the apex. Following resection on the convex side, another rod-link reducer will be connected and locked on the two convex temporary rods. The resection of the remaining vertebra will be performed on the concave side.
Deformity correction is performed by loosening the adjustable central mechanism of the rod-link reducer on the convex side with the reduction handles, which will be gradually compressed to shorten the resected gap. During the compression the resected gap on the convexity, the central part of rod-link reducer on the concavity will be gradually loosen to match the compression/shortening on the convexity.
After deformity correction, two final rods will be fixed on the convex and concave side via the second aperture of the pedicle screw respectively. The two rod-link reducers will be unlocked and all temporary rods will be removal. A custom wrench will be used to remove the first aperture parts of the pedicle screw.
The pedicle screw and any of its components including the bone fastener, threads, neck and screwhead, may be made of a non-organic material that is durable and that can be implanted in a human body, such as titanium, stainless steel, spring steel, aluminum, Niobium, carbon fiber, ceramics, polymers, composites or any relatively hard material (e.g. Titanium-Aluminium-Niobium-alloy). Generally, the material selected will be biocompatible, that is, compatible with the surrounding bone and tissue.
The present invention provides a substantial improvement in addressing clinical problems indicated for surgical treatment of chronic or acute spinal injuries, including traumatic spinal injuries, scoliosis (abnormal lateral curvature of the spine), kyphosis (abnormal forward curvature of the spine, often in the thoracic spine), excess lordosis (abnormal backward curvature of the spine, often in the lumbar spine), spondylolisthesis (forward displacement of one vertebra over another, often in a lumbar or cervical spine) and other disorders caused by abnormalities, disease or trauma, such as ruptured or slipped discs, degenerative disc disease, fractured vertebra, and the like.
The rod link reducer 100 may be used in conjunction with existing spinal screw and rod fixation systems or may be used in conjunction with the pedicle screw 10. The size and thickness of rods may be varied depending on the type of surgery, tensile strength required and preference of the user.
The present invention can be used to correct mild to severe spinal deformities, including sever deformities. The present invention includes the following advantages: a reduced risk of intraoperative mishaps due to the instability caused by exchanging the temporary rods with the permanent rod, it increases the directions in which the deformities can be corrected and reduces the number of tools, and surgical time caused by temporary rod failure or slipping that occurs between the final positioning of the temporary rods and the fixation of the permanent rod. It has been found that the present invention allows the surgeon to shorten the duration of the operation and also increases the extent of correction in a single procedure.
As the skilled artisan will appreciate the first and second translatable transverse shafts 110, 112 may be in-line, as depicted in
It was found that using the present invention no significant differences in the ROM between the three constructs except right lateral bending in which the provisional rod/rod-link and the provisional rod constructs ROM were greater than the final rod construct (P=0.005) (Table 1).
The provisional rod/rod-link reducer construct provided similar stiffness and stability compared to the provisional and final rod constructs. This new system may offer a safer, easier and improved deformity correction, as well as shorter surgical time for the PVCR of the severe spinal deformity.
The novel pedicle screw/rod-link reducer offers better maintenance of spinal stability throughout the surgical procedure to reduce risk of the spinal cord injuries. This system may therefore provide a safer, easier and improved deformity correction, as well as shorter surgical time for the PVCR of the severe spinal deformity.
The present invention overcomes the following disadvantages of existing systems, namely, the limitation for the apical vertebral derotation and translation. Another disadvantage or existing systems is the difficulty for concave rod derotation and/or translation which result in pedicle screw loosening with damage to the spinal cord. The present invention overcomes both of these advantages by providing a stable, sturdy platform for use of temporary and permanent rods using a single pedicle screw. The pedicle screw of the present invention maximizes the structural-mechanical properties of each fixation point (the lower versus the upper rod coupling) for each specific type of rod (permanent or temporary) while at the same time maximizing the efficiency of the surgical procedure with less tools and equipment. Furthermore, surgeons are already familiar with similar tools and fasteners and do not have to learn new procedures, techniques or the use of new tools.
It is contemplated that any embodiment discussed in this specification can be implemented with respect to any method, kit, reagent, or composition of the invention, and vice versa. Furthermore, compositions of the invention can be used to achieve methods of the invention.
It will be understood that particular embodiments described herein are shown by way of illustration and not as limitations of the invention. The principal features of this invention can be employed in various embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, numerous equivalents to the specific procedures described herein. Such equivalents are considered to be within the scope of this invention and are covered by the claims.
All publications and patent applications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains. All publications and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The use of the word “a” or “an” when used in conjunction with the term “comprising” in the claims and/or the specification may mean “one,” but it is also consistent with the meaning of “one or more,” “at least one,” and “one or more than one.” The use of the term “or” in the claims is used to mean “and/or” unless explicitly indicated to refer to alternatives only or the alternatives are mutually exclusive, although the disclosure supports a definition that refers to only alternatives and “and/or.” Throughout this application, the term “about” is used to indicate that a value includes the inherent variation of error for the device, the method being employed to determine the value, or the variation that exists among the study subjects.
As used in this specification and claim(s), the words “comprising” (and any form of comprising, such as “comprise” and “comprises”), “having” (and any form of having, such as “have” and “has”), “including” (and any form of including, such as “includes” and “include”) or “containing” (and any form of containing, such as “contains” and “contain”) are inclusive or open-ended and do not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps.
The term “or combinations thereof” as used herein refers to all permutations and combinations of the listed items preceding the term. For example, “A, B, C, or combinations thereof” is intended to include at least one of: A, B, C, AB, AC, BC, or ABC, and if order is important in a particular context, also BA, CA, CB, CBA, BCA, ACB, BAC, or CAB. Continuing with this example, expressly included are combinations that contain repeats of one or more item or term, such as BB, AAA, MB, BBC, AAABCCCC, CBBAAA, CABABB, and so forth. The skilled artisan will understand that typically there is no limit on the number of items or terms in any combination, unless otherwise apparent from the context.
All of the compositions and/or methods disclosed and claimed herein can be made and executed without undue experimentation in light of the present disclosure. While the compositions and methods of this invention have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations may be applied to the compositions and/or methods and in the steps or in the sequence of steps of the method described herein without departing from the concept, spirit and scope of the invention. All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and concept of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/025,761, filed Feb. 2, 2008, and to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/080,162 filed Jul. 11, 2008, the contents of both of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4653489 | Tronzo | Mar 1987 | A |
4743260 | Burton | May 1988 | A |
4772261 | Von Hoff et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4946458 | Harms et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5005562 | Cotrel | Apr 1991 | A |
5047030 | Draenert | Sep 1991 | A |
5067955 | Cotrel | Nov 1991 | A |
5133717 | Chopin | Jul 1992 | A |
5219349 | Krag | Jun 1993 | A |
5329933 | Graf | Jul 1994 | A |
5385565 | Ray | Jan 1995 | A |
5397363 | Gelbard | Mar 1995 | A |
5593407 | Reis | Jan 1997 | A |
5620443 | Gertzbein et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630816 | Kambin | May 1997 | A |
5702395 | Hopf | Dec 1997 | A |
5707372 | Errico | Jan 1998 | A |
5728097 | Mathews | Mar 1998 | A |
5800407 | Eldor | Sep 1998 | A |
5871484 | Spievack et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876403 | Shitoto | Mar 1999 | A |
5941877 | Viegas | Aug 1999 | A |
5993449 | Schlapfer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6077263 | Ameil et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090113 | Le Couedic et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6136002 | Shih et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6214012 | Karpman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6248106 | Ferree | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6287309 | Baccelli et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6423062 | Enayati | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6461359 | Tribus et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6488681 | Martin et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6517542 | Papay et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6554830 | Chappius | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554834 | Crozet et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558390 | Cragg | May 2003 | B2 |
6565572 | Chappius | May 2003 | B2 |
6569164 | Assaker et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6582439 | Sproul | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6610063 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6620195 | Goble et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6623485 | Doubler et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6663637 | Dixon et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6730095 | Olson, Jr. et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740086 | Richelsoph | May 2004 | B2 |
6740090 | Cragg et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6749613 | Conchy et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6755835 | Schultheiss et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6780191 | Sproul | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6858030 | Martin et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6881215 | Assaker et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6899714 | Vaughan | May 2005 | B2 |
6942698 | Jackson | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6945975 | Dalton | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6964665 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974460 | Carbone et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6976988 | Ralph et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981973 | McKinley | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7008433 | Voellmicke et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7033392 | Schmiel et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7041138 | Lange | May 2006 | B2 |
7163539 | Abdelgany et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7220262 | Hynes | May 2007 | B1 |
7658753 | Carl et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7776072 | Barry | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789897 | Sanders | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8007522 | Hutchinson | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8083773 | Durrani | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8277453 | Kave et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20020007183 | Lee | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013585 | Gournay et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020095153 | Jones et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030065329 | Vaughan | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030144664 | Cavagna et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040111088 | Picetti | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040158247 | Sitiso et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050203511 | Wilson-MacDonald et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234449 | Aferzon | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050277934 | Vardiman | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060036246 | Carl et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060173456 | Hawkes et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195092 | Barry | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060247623 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293659 | Alvarez | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070093824 | Hestad et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070213715 | Bridwell et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213716 | Lenke | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225713 | Altarac | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233062 | Berry | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233089 | DiPoto | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270805 | Miller et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270810 | Sanders | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286366 | Deboy et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080027436 | Cournoyer et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080177323 | Null et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080255617 | Cho et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090099605 | Fallin et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090131982 | Schwab | May 2009 | A1 |
20090198273 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090326586 | Duarte | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100042149 | Chao et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100076494 | Markworth | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100247600 | Xia et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249843 | Wegrzyn, III | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256683 | Iott et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110137358 | Manninen | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120221057 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130090691 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2003250822 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2008128105 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2009097623 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009097624 | Aug 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bradford, D.S., et al., “One-stage anterior and posterior hemivertebral resection and arthrodesis for congenital scoliosis.” JBJS (1990), 72-A:536-40. |
Compere, E.L., et al., “Excision of hemivertebrae for correction of congenital scoliois: report of two cases.” JBJS (1932), 14-A:555-62. |
Deviten, V., et al., “Excision of hemivertebrae in the management of congenital scoliosis involving the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine.” JBJS (2001), 83-B:496-500. |
Floman, Y., et al. “Osteotomy of the fusion mass in scoliosis.” JBJS (1982), 64-A:1307-16. |
Leatherman, K.D., et al. “Two-stage corrective surgery for congenital deformities of the spine.” JBJS (1979), 61-B:324-8. |
Suk, S., et al. “Posterior vertebral column resection for severe spinal deformities.” Spine (2002), 27:2374-82. |
Suk, S., et al. “Posterior vertebral column resection for severe spinal deformities.” Spine (2005), 30:1682-87. |
Suk, S., et al. “Posterior vertebral column resection in fixed lumbosacral deformity.” Spine (2005), 30:E703-10. |
Tokunaga, M., et al. “Verteral decancellation for severe scoliosis.” Spine (2000), 25:469-74. |
Wiles, P. “Resection of dorsalvertebrae in congenital scoliosis.” JBJS (1951), 33-A:151-4. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2009/032901 dated Sep. 24, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2009/032899 dated Oct. 15, 2009. |
Berguiristain, J. L., et al., “Experimental Scoliosis by Epiphysiodesis in Pigs,” International Orthopaedics (1980), 3:317-321. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of Australia Patent Office for PCT/US2008/60115 dated Sep. 18, 2008, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090198279 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61025761 | Feb 2008 | US | |
61080162 | Jul 2008 | US |