Patent Application
20230338161
The present invention is directed generally to a device intended to replace or partially replace a vertebral body or intervertebral disc in the cervical, thoracic or lumbar spine, as well as methods for its use and deployment
All publications cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference. The following description includes information that may be useful in understanding the present invention It is not an admission that any of the information provided herein is prior art or relevant to the presently claimed invention or that any publication specifically or implicitly referenced in prior art.
Various devices are known in the an for the replacement or partial replacement of vertebral bodies or invertebral discs in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. These are often used to replace, restore, correct, augment, strengthen, support or maintain height of a unstable, fractured, collapsed, damaged, degenerated or degraded vertebral body segment or intervertrebral disc space or portion thereof, which has compromised integrity due to cancer or tumor or other lesion including hematalogic, metabolic or other systemic processes affecting wind strictures; is unstable because of trauma or any other process compromising integrity of ligaments, soft tissues, or osseous structures: of is charcterized by a degenerative or deforming process including but not limited to congenital deformities, degenerative disease, kyphosis, spinal deformity/scoliosis, or spondylolisthesis. The device described herein is also relevant and applicable as it pertains to any spinal segment that has a surgical in based on patient presentation and surgeon’s judgment with no limitations otherwise. Cervical neck pain or axial back pain with or without radicular symptoms are frequently symptoms and neurologic deficit involving less of strength or sensation is frequently a sign, of such conditions. Further devices and methods are known in the art fof performing the surgical procedures required to effectuate the removal or disc tissue or osseous structures and achieve the insertion and placement of same type of spinal segment replacement device.
The number of thoracic and lumbar fusions being performed has increased dramatically duing the past ten years, far in excess of what would be expected proportionately considering population growth and aging demographics alone. Spine surgeons are now seeing many patients return post-fusion with symptoms limiting their professional, personal, and social functionally that stem from a fusion performed in the past without appropriate consideration for the biomechanical principle of sagitial balance and restoration of lumbar lordosis. The vast majority of thoracic and lumber fusions are currently performed through a posterior approach, through a posterolateral fusion that does not involve interbody grafting or via a posterior lumbar interbody fusion (“PLIF”) cage (i.e., the disc space is accessed bilaterally and extsusive nerve root retraction is required) or through a transformational lumbar interbody fusion (“TLIF”) with a TLIF cage (i.e., the spine is approached posterorly similar to the PLIF, but unilaterally more from the side of the spinal canal through the foramen, potentially reducing nerve root retraction required to access the disc). The traditional posterior approach is well-tolerated by patients but can restrict the amount of disc material that can be removed safely and more importantly restricts the size end type of currently available cage that can he placed through this small opening, an orifice limited by the degree of traction that can be placed on critical serve roots or otherwise limited by the window of acces to the disc space. Current grafts availible for insertion via a posterior approach are hamperd by subphysiologic degrees of lordosis and endplate coverage, compared with anatomically appropriate lordtic grafts with larger endplate coverage. Given currently available technology, marketed grafts and described techniques, these subpar grafts are inserted from a posterior trajectory and do not restore appropriate lumbar lordosis or sagittal balance. Up to now, limited space afforded by a posterior approach because of proximity of critical nerve roots has seemingly and supposedly limited the size and type of graft that has been marketed as available for posterior insertion. Insertion of a smaller and biomechanically misproportioned graft, as necessitated by current grafts that are available for insertion from a posterior approach at this time, may lead to a higher rate of pseudoarthrosis and lower rate of fusion, since surface area contact of endplate vs. graft is less than that obtained during an anterior approach where a larger and more biomechanically appropriate graft can be implanted. Anatomically and biomechanically, the posterior approach to discectomy and fusion, using currently available implants, is further limited in its ability to reestablish optimal lumbar lordosis and restore global sagittal balance (global sagittal imbalance is defined as a distance of greater than 50 mm from the C7 sagittal vertical axis and the S1 sagittal vertical axis), key biomechanical phenomena proven in the literature to be critical to successful patient outcomes. See, e.g., S D Glassman et al., “The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity Spine 30(18):2024-9 (2005).
Although the posterior approach to the spine can be faster, easier and less risky in most patients, many surgeon find that the anterior approach to the spine and placement of an Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (“ALIF”) cage is more advantageous because of larger endplate coverage and increased degree of lordosis of the graft that can be implanted, thus achieving greater graft-endplate surface area contact and better biomechanical establishment of lumbar lordosis and restoration of sagittal balance. This procedure is performed from the ventral aspect of the spine, usually through a 3-5 inch incision in the lower left abdominal area. This incision may involve cutting through, and later repairing, the muscles in the lower abdomen, retracting the peritoneum, and retracting the great vessels and ureter. This enables total direct discectomy and placement of a large lordotic cage with generous endplate contact, resulting in excellent fusion rates, and superb reestablishment of lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance. However, the ALIF is somewhat limited in its employment because it requires access to the anterior part of the spine to be provided by a trained vascular or other qualified surgeon before the spine surgeon can perform discectomy and fusion (whereas the posterior approach does not require an approach surgeon). The anterior approach can lead to life-threatening consequences, such as loss of limb and life-threatening hemorrhage, as well as retrograde ejaculation in men, impairing their fertility. The anterior approach may also require further posterior stabilization subsequently, thus leaving patients with an incision from the front of the abdomen and a second incision from the back. Finally, the anterior approach carries a risk of abdominal pseudohernia or truehernia. These potential complications and hassles explain why most spine surgeons prefer the more practical posterior approach and use currently available grafts, but compromise with fusion rates, lordosis reestablishment and sagittal balance correction that is inferior to an anterior approach with a more biomechanically sound graft.
The ideal then would be a graft that can be inserted from a posterior approach (which carries the least risk of morbidity for the patient) but achieves similar benefits to grafts currently available for anterior insertionin terms of restoring sagittal balance and lumbar lordosis. While there are some devices known in the art that are configured for posterior insertion while seeking increased disc and intervertebral height in excess of that traditionally achieved by grafts used in the past during the posterior approach, these devices each suffer from their own limitations and do not correct for the biomechanical shortcomings of current grafts as described above.
There thus remains a need in the art for a device that is configured substantially for posterior insertion (but that can indeed be inserted from an anterior or lateral trajectory as well), and that incorporates the superior biomechanical advantages of an ALIF-type deployment device (e.g., restoring anatomic degree of lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance and improving graft-endplate contact in order to improve fusion rates), while obviating various physiological, mechanical and practical challenges of placement that would otherwise accompany placement from an anterior trajectory. The graft should be placed after thorough and extensive discectomy with minimal risk of harming critical neurovascular structures by way of a protected portal. Described herein is a device and method that simultaneously accomplishes the above.
In an embodiment, the invention includes an apparatus, comprising: a first element having a top and a bottom; a second element having a top and a bottom; one or more bridging structures, each in mechanical communication with both the first element and the second element, wherein upon actuation of the one or more bridging structures, the first element and the second element separate from one another; and a lordotic expander, wherein upon actuation of the lordotic expander, the top and the bottom of the first element expand apart from one another, The one or more bridging structures may each comprise complementary male and female screw threading. The apparatus may be generally bullet-shaped. The lordotic expander may be configured to be actuated by a series of rotational clicks. Each of said rotational clicks may represent an approximately 5 degree increase in lordosis when said apparatus is inserted and deployed in an interverebral space. The first element may be configured to be placed in the posterior region of so intervertebral space following its deployment in a spine surgery procedure. The second element may be configured to be placed in the anterior region of an intervertebral space following its deployment in a spine surgery procedure. The top of the first element and/or the top of the second element and/or the bottom of the first element and/or the bottom of the second element may independently comprise a surface treatment to reduce migration following insertion and deployment of the apparatus in an intervertebral space. The surface treatment may comprise spikes, teeth or an adhesive. The apparatus may be configured to mechanically communicate with a tool whereby actuation of the tool causes actuation of the one or more bridging structures. The apparatus may be configured to mechanically communicate with a tool, whereby actuation of the tool causes actuation of the lordotic expander. The apparatus may be adapted for insertion into an intervertebral space through a handle of a distractor tool
In another embodiment, the invention includes, in combination, the aforementioned apparatus and a distractor tool, the distractor tool comprising: a hand; and an expansion mechanism attached to the handle, the expansion mechanism to controllably expand or retract in both the anterior-posterior direction and the rostral-coudal direction within an intervertebral space. The expansion mechanism may further comprise a first pair of blades to controllably expand or retract in the anterior-posterior direction, and a second set of blades to controllably expand or retract in the rostral-caudal direction,
In another embodiment, the invention includes, in combination, the aforementioned apparatus and a mesh structure to contain a quantity of a material, a graft material or a fusion-promoting chemical or protein. The mesh structure may be incorporated within a space created between the first, element and the second element following insertion and deployment of the apparatus. The apparatus may be encapsulated within the mesh structure.
In another embodiment, the invention includes a method, comprising: providing an apparatus, comprising: a first element having a top and a bottom, a second element having a top and a bottom, one or more bridging structures, each in mechanical communication with both the first element and the second element, wherein upon actuation of the one or more bridging structures, the first element and the second element separate from one another, and a lordotic expander, wherein upon actuation of the lordotic expander, the top and the bottom of the first element expand apart from one another; inserting the apparatus into an intervertebral space; actuating the one or more bridging strutures; and actuating the lordotic expander. Prior to insecting the apparatus into the intervertebral space, the method may further comprise removing an intervertebral disc, debris, soft tissues of osseous structures from the intervertebral space. Inserting the apparatus into the intervertebral space may further comprise: providing a distractor tool comprising a handle and an expansion mechanism attached to the handle, the expansion mechanism to controllably expand or retract in both the anterior-posterior direction and the rostral-caudal direction within an intervertebral space; expanding the expansion mechanism; and repositioning the apparatus through the handle and into the intervertebral space.
Exemplary embodiments am illustrated in referenced figures. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered flustrative rather than restrictive.
All references cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety as though fully set forth. Unless defined otherwise, technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. One skilled in the art will recognize many methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein, which could be used in the practice of the present invention. Indeed, the present invention is in no way limited to the methods and materials described.
The invention relates to a device intended to replace or partially replace one or more vertebral bodies or intervertebral discs in the cervical, thoracic or lumbar spine. The device is configured to be inserted through a posterior approach and may require a spine surgeon only, thereby obviating the need for an anterior approach and its associated complications. Several additional features of the device set it apart from other cages inserted through a posterior approach; for instance, and among other things, it may be introduced through a unique posterior insertion technique allowing for an extensive discectomy through a protected portal that safegaurds the neural elements posteriorly and vascular elements anteriorly; the device may eventually expand to approximate the size of an ALIF cage with superior endplate contact and fusion rate; and the device may enable reestablishment of lumber lordosis from 0 to 15 degrees or other various degrees and can help reestablish global sagittal balance. The device can be inserted through a traditional small posterior approach to the disc space or vertebral body that accommodates the initial pre-deployment compact size of the cage, which is then expandable not only in rostral-caudal height/degrees of lordosis anteriorly, but also expandable in the anterior-posterior direction. These features are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, and are currently not commercially available through other cages and similar devices.
In one embodiment, the device 100 is illustrated in
The device 100 may be generally bullet-shaped at one or both of its ends 101, 102, (the device 100 illustratively depicted in the Figures is bullet-shaped at both ends). This may aid in insertion of the device 100 into the interbody space, which may follow partial or total discectomy or corpectomy or other substantial clearing of tissue, debris and/or other material from the interbody space. The device 100 may incorporate two elements that are connected; a first element 103 that is configured to remain in the anterior region of the interbody space following insertion and deployment, and a second element 104 that is configured to remain in the posterior region of the interbody space following insertion and deployment. As used herein, “deployment” refers to the mechanical process by which the first element 103 and second element 104 are distracted from one another into their desired locations but still connected via bridging structures 105 to each other, and “lordotic expansion” refers to the mechanical process by which the first element 103 is expanded in the rostral-caudal direction so as to impart the desired angle of lordosis to that segment of the spine.
Anterior-posterior deployment and lordotic expansion of the device 100 may each be effected by actuation of a single or more tools that are adapted to mechanically interact with the device 100 to achieve each of these results. In each case, the tool(s) can be controlled by the surgeon. This may be accomplished, for instance, through actuation of a mechanical or electronic mechanism on or in communication with the tool(s) to create the desired result. In the case of deployment, actuation of the tool(s) causes the first element 103 and second element 104 to separate from one another to either a single predetermined distance or a distance that may be controlled by the surgeon depending on a variety of factors that will be appreciated by those of skill in the art (e.g., configuration and structure of the disc space, bone quality of endplate, extent of discectomy, etc.). Separation of the first element 103 and the second element 104 from one another is illustratively depicted in
One or more bridging structures 105 may cause deployment by operating to drive the first element 103 and the second element 104 away from one another through use of the aforementioned tool(s). The bridging structures 105 may comprise any number of mechanical components to achieve this desired function, as will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art. Simply by way of example, the bridging structures 105 may include complementary male and female screw threading, such that the rotation of particular elements within the bridging structures 105 forces the first element 103 and second element 104 apart from one another Alternatively, the bridging structures 105 may comprise a peg and groove system.
A lordotic expander 106 may operate to increase the overall “height” of the first element 103 in the rostral-caudal direction, again, through use of the aforementioned single or multiple tools. In alternate embodiments (not shown), a second lordotic expander that operates either together with or independently of the lordotic expander 106 in the first element 103 may be included in the second element 104. As illustrated in
The surfaces of the first embodiment 103 and second element 104 that are intended to come into contact with the vertebrae following insertion and deployment may be configured so as to reduce migration. For instance, these surfaces may indude spikes, teeth or other mechanical features 107 (
In a further embodiment of the invention, one or more expandable balloon and/or mesh structures may be included to biomechanically support the device 100 and to contain a volume of material (e.g., graft material) or other fusion-promoting chemical/protein to enhance fusion following surgery. Any number of such structures and corresponding materials are known to those of skill in the art and can be implemented in combination with the device 100 by routine procedures. By way of example, a mesh structure 300 may be incorporated within the space created between the first element 103 and second element 104 following deployment. Alternatively, the entire device 100 may be encapsulated within a mesh structure 300 (
With regard to the tools referenced above, as illustrated in
The distractor tool 200 may be configured to operate with a disc removal tool. The disc removal tool is adapted to remove disc (e.g., under fluoroscopic guidance) and gently decorticate bone as an option if desired given quality of the endplate to prepare a fusion bed for the device 100. In one embodiments, the disc removal tool includes a rotating shaver and a vacuum suction device, thereby allowing a surgeon to mechanically disrupt disc and related materials in the interbody space or in the intervertebral space and simultaneously remove these items from the interbody space by operation at the vacuum. In one embodiment, the disc removal tool is configured to operate in concert with the distractor tool; for instance, once the distractor tool is inserted to increase disc and foraminal height and protect neurovascular structures, the disc removal tool can be inserted and operated through the hollow neck of the distractor tool and thus reach the interbody space. In operation, the disc removal tool may have a variety of safety features, including, by way of example, a feature that results in an alarm when the disc removal tool, in operation, contacts cortical bone, so the surgeon can avoid breach of the cortex.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the device 100 is configured to be inserted into the interbody space through the neck of the distractor tool, In another embodiment of the invention, one or more additional tools (such as an inserter tool) are configured to operate through the neck of the distractor tool to position, deploy and/or actuate various mechanical features of the device 100. For instance, an inserter tool may be used to actuate the bridging structures 105 and/or the lordotic expander 106. In one embodiment of the invention, a single tool (or possibly multiple tools) may be used for cage insertion, expanding in the anterior-posterior direction, lordotic expansion in the rostral-caudal direction, further tamping and adjusting of cage final position under fluoroscopic guidance, retraction and removal of cage, and insertion of fusion or graft material.
The following non-limiting examples are provided to further illustrate embodiments of the invention disclosed herein. It should be appreciated by those of skill in the art that the techniques disclosed in the examples that follow represent appoaches that have been found to function well in the practice of the invention, and thus can be considered to constitute an example of a mode for its practice. However, those of skill in the art should, in light of the present disclosure, appreciate that many changes can be made in the specific embodiments that are disclosed and still obtain a like or similar result without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
A device as illustrated in
The cage device is then inserted into the interbody space through the neck of the distractor tool with the blades of the distractor tool retracted to allow for proper placement of the cage device against the endplates, and mechanichal force may be employed (e.g., through use of a mallet) to properly orient and position the device within the interbody space. Fluoroscopy may also be used to guide proper placement of the device. The device is then deployed in the anterior-posterior direction (by pushing down on a lever-handle on an inserter tool or other mechanism for deployment that is in mechanical communication with the device and its bridging structures) and lordotic expansion is achieved to the desired angle (by rotating a dial (e.g., a clicking dial) on the handle of or otherwise actuating the inserter tool to control the lordotic expander in the device) as described above. Proper placement is confirmed via fluoroscopy. If the position of the device is satisfactory, a mesh positioned around the cage is filled with graft or other fusion-promoting material, the device is then disengaged from the inserter tool (which is removed), and the distractor is then removed.
The various methods and techniques described above provide a number of ways to carry out the invention. This patent description pertains to any interbody device this is expandable in the anterior for trajectory in situ and/or can achieve variable degrees of lordosis in situ, depending on the clinical indication. Of course, it is to be understood that not necessarily all objectives or advantages described may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment described herein. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the methods can be performed in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other objectives or advantages as may be taught or suggested herein. A variety of advantageous and disadvantageous alternatives are mentioned herein. It is to be understood that some preffered embodiments specifically include one, another, or several advantageous features, while others specifically exclude one, another, or several disadvantageous features, while still others specifically mitigate a present disadvantageous feature by inclusion of one, another, or several advantageous features.
Furthermore, the skilled artisan will recognize the applicability of various features from different embodiments, Similarly, the various elements, features and steps discussed above, as well as other known equivalents for each such element feature or step, can be mixed and matched by one of ordinary skill in this art to perform methods in accordance with principles described herein. Among the various elements, features, and steps same will be specifically included and others specifically excluded in diverse embodiments.
Although the invention has been disclosed in the context of certain embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the embodiments of the invention extend beyond the specifically disclosed embodiment to other alternative embodiments and/or uses and modifications and equivalents thereof.
Many variations and alternative elements have been disclosed in embodiments of the present invention. Still further variations and alternate elements will be apparent to one of skill in the art. Various embodiments of the invention can specifically include or exclude any of these variations or elements.
In some embodiments, the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar references used in the context of describing a particular embodiment of the invention (especially in the context of certain of the following claims) can be construed to cover both the singular and the plural. The recitation of ranges of values herein is merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range. Unless othewise indicated herein, each individual value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided with respect to certain embodiments herein is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention otherwise claimed.
Preferred embodiments of this invention are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. Variations on those preferred embodiments will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. It is contemplated that skilled artisans can employ such variations as appropriate, and the invention can be practiced otherwise than specifically described herein. Accordingly, many embodiments of this invention include all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitied by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
In closing, it is to be understood that the embodiments of the invention disclosed herein are illustrative of the principles of the present invention. Other modifications that can be employed can be within the scope of the invention. Thus, by way of example, but not of limitation, alternative configurations of the present invention can be utilized in accordance with the teachings herein. Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention are not limited to that precisely as shown and described.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Application Ser. No. 15/406,463, filed Jan. 13, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,307,264, which is a continuation of U.S. Application Ser. No. 14/798,127, filed Jul. 13, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No, 2,545,319, which is a continuation of U.S. Application Ser. No. 13/576,767, filed Aug. 2, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,078,769, which is the National Phase: of International Application PCT/US11/23502, filed Feb. 2, 2011, which designated the U.S. and that International application was published under PCT Article 21 (2) in English, This application also includes a claim of priority under 35 U.S.C, § 119(e) to U.S. Provisitonal Pat. Application No. 61/300,580, filed Feb. 2, 2010. All of the above applications are incroporated by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61300580 | Feb 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16430084 | Jun 2019 | US |
| Child | 18345824 | US | |
| Parent | 15406563 | Jan 2017 | US |
| Child | 16430084 | US | |
| Parent | 14798127 | Jul 2015 | US |
| Child | 15406563 | US | |
| Parent | 13576767 | Aug 2012 | US |
| Child | 14798127 | US |
