This invention relates to the field of rotary pressure cleaning machines.
“Cleaner Times,” published by Advantage Publishing Co. Inc., Little Rock, Ak. is a monthly publication of the technical journal of the high pressure water applications industry. Rotary pressure cleaning machines are well known within this large industry.
The machines usually have handlebars to control a spray head. The spray head has a hood or shroud that encloses a rotary spray bar or spinner bar which carries spray nozzles. The spray head may be mounted on wheels or it may float on the residual pressure from the spray nozzles. Pressurized liquid is supplied through the spray head and spinner bar to the nozzles, via a standard engine and pump configuration, to produce a spray that accomplishes the work of cleaning a surface over which the machine is maneuvered. The spinner bar may be rotated by the reaction force of the spray nozzles or it may be independently powered, as by the combination of a belt and motor, or both.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,191,590 to Sundheim is typical of such machines and discloses a spinner bar with two nozzles, one at each end of the bar. The nozzles may be adjusted as to the angle of inclination in regard to the plane of rotation, the spray pattern, flow rate, and spray arc. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,370,728; 5,135,015; and 6,012,645 are each directed to a rotary machine having a spinner bar and one nozzle on each end. U.S. Pat. No. 5,265,805 is directed to a rotary machine with a three bladed spinner bar with one nozzle at each of the three ends.
There are certain shortcomings in the rotary pressure cleaning art which result in a non-uniform appearance of a cleaned surface and cause the machines to create excessive noise. The prior art machines are also generally restricted to hard surfaces due to the high pressure impact of the liquid upon a small area. The construction of the prior art devices deliver cleaning spray to a small impact area causing uneven application of the cleaning spray resulting in stripes and swirls on the cleaned surface. The small impact area also causes the prior art machines to have a high noise level and is also inefficient and usually requires retracing for adequate cleaning of a surface.
In the normal use of all rotary cleaners, the spray head is moved over a surface in a pattern of passes. Because of the rotation of the spray bar, each pass leaves a cleaned path the length of the pass and the width of the diameter of the spray bar. To clean a large area, a number of passes must be made with the edge of a later path overlapping the edge of an earlier path. This overlapping causes the same area of the surface to be cleaned more than once.
Conventional machines have a common problem of overlapping paths producing a series of stripes and swirls of extra-clean surface which contrasts with the remainder of the surface. To overcome this nonuniformity of color, the surface must be retraced until the stripes are obliterated or reduced. Regardless of the pattern of passes, straight, rectangular, or circular, the stripes or swirls created require more time and repetition to produce an acceptable uniform cleaned surface. This repetition results in increased labor costs and wear on the machines.
Because of the high pressures, for example 200-5000 psi, there is a significant level of noise during the use of the machine. Also, having a nozzle on each end of a two bladed or three bladed spray bar produces a small cleaned area equal to the narrow spray coverage as the spray bar rotates resulting in a particular time frame for cleaning a large surface. This high pressure limits the surfaces that the conventional machines can be used to clean without damaging the substrate, for example some nozzles will scour grout from between tiles, score soft woods for decks, or remove particles from roofing shingles.
What is needed in the art is a surface cleaner that has a lower noise level, accomplishes work faster, produces a uniform cleaned surface and can be used on softer surfaces.
An improved spinner bar for rotary surface cleaning machines includes an array of spray nozzles at each end of the bar. The nozzles in each array are adjustable. The outermost nozzle in each array is oriented at a different angle of inclination to the plane of rotation than the angle of the inner nozzles. The improved spinner bar results in a more uniform appearance in the cleaned surface, has a low noise level and reduces man-hours.
Therefore, it is an objective of this invention to provide an improved spinner bar for a rotary washer that has an array of multiple nozzles at the ends of the spinner bar to reduce noise and increase the area impacted by the pressurized liquid.
It is another objective of this invention to provide the array of nozzles with an angle of inclination to the plane of rotation with the outermost nozzle having a different angle than inner nozzles to prevent stripes and swirls on the cleaned surface.
It is a further objective of this invention to provide an array of nozzles on the spinner bar that have a low impingment to prevent damage to soft surfaces during cleaning.
The prior art rotary cleaning machine 10, shown in
The spinner bar 21, shown in
The arrangement of the nozzles in each array is such that the spray from each overlaps the spray of the others. The spray pattern may be conical, fan, or spot. The lesser angle of the outer spray results in a feathering effect such that the overlapping paths of the machine does not result in the creation of a stripe of ultra-clean surface upon subsequent passes of the machine.
Further, the six nozzles of the arrays cover a large area on each path allowing fewer rotational passes of the spray bar per square foot of surface. The fluid pressure in the line is divided by the six nozzles so that the noise produced by the machine is low when compared to the prior art. In addition, the fluid impingement on the surface to be cleaned is low enabling the machine to be used on shingle roofs, paving brick and concrete surfaces, and tile and grout surfaces, wood surfaces and others.
A comparative test was performed using the same rotary cleaning machine with different spinner bars of the same length. The test surface was a concrete driveway divided into 6 equal test zones. Each machine was used to clean 3 identical zones. Two zones were 30 feet long; 2 zones were 20 feet long; and 2 zones were 10 feet long. Each machine traversed each respective test zone in 5 passes. The machine produced 2000 psi and delivered 7.9 gallons per minute (gpm) using a 13 hp motor and a 150 feet length supply hose.
The comparative test results are as follows:
With regard to the conventional nozzle size and angle of inclination which determine RPM of the spinner bar, the size and angle are considered optimal for the pressure used in the test.
A number of embodiments of the present invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited by the specific illustrated embodiment but only by the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3118607 | Rocher | Jan 1964 | A |
3748050 | Poppitz | Jul 1973 | A |
4191589 | Halls et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4191590 | Sundheim | Mar 1980 | A |
4377018 | Cain | Mar 1983 | A |
4903364 | Long | Feb 1990 | A |
5004156 | Montanier | Apr 1991 | A |
5265805 | Artenian | Nov 1993 | A |
5456412 | Agee | Oct 1995 | A |
5636402 | Kubo et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5970574 | Thrash, Jr. | Oct 1999 | A |
6012645 | Poppitz | Jan 2000 | A |
6129094 | Moll et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151748 | Earhart et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6230984 | Jager | May 2001 | B1 |
6392967 | Nakayama et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20115506 | Jan 2002 | DE |
2 024 611 | Jan 1980 | GB |
8-84964 | Apr 1996 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050205120 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |