The core elements of conventional water treatment include the sequential process steps of coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation and physical filtration. These process steps require corresponding physical structures such as coagulation basins and flocculation basins where portions of the respective processes take place. Typically, chemical coagulants are used to screen Coulomb repulsion (i.e., neutralize charge) and promote aggregation of sub-micron particulates into pin floc. The time needed to aggregate (i.e., aggregation time) is determined by several parameters including concentration and size of aggregates.
Flocculants in the form of long chain polymers can then be added to anchor the flocs to form larger entities that settle faster in the sedimentation basin. The hydraulic retention time through the first 3 stages may be 5-10 hours, depending on the input water quality and the facility, and require a substantial physical footprint and initial infrastructure costs.
A transformative approach to the practice of conventional water treatment has been taught in the applications such as those incorporated herein by reference. Features of this approach include: high scalability, modularity, small footprint, high throughput, purely fluidic, continuous flow, membrane-less, size selective cut-off, and accelerated agglomeration kinetics. The described systems will work with particulates of any density, but especially those with neutral buoyancy. These features allow reduced coagulant dosage by 50% to achieve the same turbidity reduction; which may be attributed to the compact (i.e., dense) and self-limiting narrow size distribution of pin floc resulting from fluid shear effects. The combined effects allow for extraction of micron sized pin flocs in fluidic structures to potentially eliminate flocculation and sedimentation steps, resulting in significant savings through reduced land and chemical cost, operational overhead, and faster processing time from raw to finished water.
Conventional mixing is achieved through active stirring (e.g., with rotors) or forcing the water and coagulant to flow through passive serpentine channels to create chaotic flows to facilitate turbulent dispersion of chemicals to reduce contact time (CT). Since contact time is typically short, the hydraulic retention time in seconds through the channels may be sufficient for effective mixing. Conventional floc formation takes place in large basins where perikinetic aggregation (diffusion driven) is very slow. Orthokinetic aggregation (shear driven) is much faster, especially for the larger aggregates, but not as efficient due to large dimensions and the need to design the convective flow patterns.
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008-0128331-A1, published Jun. 5, 2008, entitled, “Particle Separation And Concentration System”; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009-0114607A1, published on May 7, 2009, entitled, “Fluidic Device And Method For Separation Of Neutrally Buoyant Particles”; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 09-0114601-A1, published May 7, 2009, entitled, “Device And Method For Dynamic Processing In Water Purification”; U.S. Ser. No. 12/120,093, filed on May 13, 2008, entitled, “Fluidic Structures For Membraneless Particle Separation”; U.S. Ser. No. 12/120,153, filed May 13, 2008, entitled, “Method And Apparatus For Splitting Fluid Flow In A Membraneless Particle Separator System”; U.S. Ser. No. 12/234,373, filed on Sep. 19, 2008, entitled, “Method And System For Seeding With Mature Floc To Accelerate Aggregation In A Water Treatment Process”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. [Attorney Dkt. No. 20081254-US-NP], filed [Unknown], entitled, “Stand-Alone Integrated Water Treatment System For Distributed Water Supply To Small Communities”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. [Attorney Dkt. No. 20080169-US-NP], filed [Unknown], entitled, “Method And Apparatus For Continuous Flow Membrane-Less Algae Dewatering”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. [Attorney Dkt. No. 20090576-US-NP], filed [Unknown], entitled, “Platform Technology For Industrial Separations”; all naming Lean et al. as inventors; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,160,025, issued Jan. 9, 2007, and entitled Micromixer Apparatus And Method Of Using Same”, to Ji et al.; all of which are incorporated herein in their entirety by this reference.
A system and method for treatment of water. An inlet is operative to receive source water having particles therein. A spiral mixer has a defined spiral channel operative to mix the source water with a well-controlled continuous stream of coagulant material and an alkalinity material. The spiral mixer is configured to perform very rapid in-line mixing of coagulant and other chemicals, nucleate primary aggregates homogeneously throughout the source water, and initiate controlled growth of these primary aggregates into dense and compact aggregates within a spiral channel of the spiral mixer. A buffer tank is operative to receive the dense aggregates and allow them to grow further beyond the cut-off size of the following separator. A spiral separator segregates contents of the buffer tank into affluent and waste water that has the aggregated floc particles therein. An outlet is operative to provide a first path for the affluent, and a second path for the waste water having the aggregated floc particles.
The presently described embodiments are directed to systems and methods that perform spiral mixing and spiral separation procedures. The spiral mixer includes an apparatus that allows for well-controlled continuous dosing of coagulant (and other known chemicals used in water treatment) into the source water stream just ahead of the spiral device. The relatively narrow confines of the spiral channels in conjunction with turbulent flow conditions allow for a very rapid distribution of the added chemicals, therefore providing an environment that allows the nucleation of very uniform primary aggregates. Further aggregation of these primary aggregates within the channels is limited to dense and compact aggregates due to the (controlled) high shear rate within the confined spaces of the channel. These uniformly-sized aggregated floc particles can then move and readily be separated without the need for downstream sedimentation. The separation can be accomplished with a spiral separator that is in direct flow contact with the spiral mixer. Optionally, a buffer tank can be placed between the spiral mixer and the spiral separator to allow further growth of the aggregates beyond the cut-off size of the spiral separator. The growth in this buffer tank can be further optimized using additional large seed particles as described in U.S. Ser. No. 12/234,373, filed on Sep. 19, 2008 and entitled “Method And System For Seeding With Mature Floc To Accelerate Aggregation In A Water Treatment Process”, which is fully incorporated heron in its entirety by this reference. Proof of concept experiments have shown that the more efficient mixing and separation described in these embodiments allows a 50% reduction of coagulant dosage to achieve the same turbidity reduction capability of conventional systems requiring extended sedimentation.
Turning now to
In exemplary system 100, water from the input source water 102 is received at a suitable inlet, which in one form is a mesh filter 104. It should be appreciated mesh filter 104 is designed to filter out relatively large particles from the input source water. In this regard, the filter 104 may be formed of a 2 mm-5 mm mesh material. Alkalinity is added continuously in-line in the form of a base to the input source water after filtering by mesh filter 104 to adjust for pH throughout the process. Any suitable base may be used. Coagulant is added continuously to the input water after the base is added and prior to mixing in a spiral mixer 108. Any suitable coagulant is used. Both, the alkalinity as well as the coagulant are added through a known well-controlled dosing system 106 that injects well-defined continuous streams adjusted to the quality of the source water.
Spiral mixer 108 receives the input source water, treated with the alkalinity, and the coagulant. The spiral mixer shown in
The output of the buffer tank 110 is connected to the spiral separator 112 which has an effluent output 114. The effluent output 114 directs effluent separated out from the source water input to the spiral separator to filtering mechanism 116. Output of filtering mechanism 116 typically comprises treated water that may be used in a variety of ways. For example, filtering mechanism 116 could be an EPA mandated physical barrier for potable water treatment. Spiral separator 112 has a second output line 118 in which waste water travels. The waste water can be disposed of in an appropriate manner.
Spiral separator 112 may take a variety of forms, However, in at least some forms, the spiral separator operates as described, for example, in U.S. Ser. No. 11/606,460, filed on Nov. 20, 2006 and entitled “Particle Separation and Concentration System,” U.S. Ser. No. 11/936,729, filed on Nov. 7, 2007 and entitled “Fluidic Device and Method for Separation of Neutrally Buoyant Particles,” and U.S. Ser. No. 11/936,753, filed on Nov. 7, 2007 and entitled “Device and Method for Dynamic Processing in Water Purification.” Additionally, spiral mixer 108 may also operate as a spiral mixer-conditioner, where mixing takes place in the channels of the turns operated at or above the critical Dean number (at or greater than 150), and aggregation conditioning occurs in the channels of the turns where the operation is below the critical Dean number.
With continuing attention to spiral separator 112, various fluidic structures, implementations and selected fabrication techniques are used to realize construction of fluidic separation structures that are of a stacked and/or parallel configuration. These contemplated systems provide for efficient input of fluid to be processed, improved throughput, and, in some variations, adjustable and efficient treatment of output fluid.
It will be understood that variations of these devices may be realized based on dimensional scale and channel architecture. However, it is contemplated that the embodiments described herein will be highly scalable to span microscale (0 to 10 mL/min), miniscale (10-1000 mL/min), and macroscale (1-10 L/min) single-channel flow rates.
Planar embodiments utilizing convenient stacking techniques which allow parallel operation are contemplated. In this regard, circular arcs (that do not complete a full physical spiral, but nonetheless are understood herein to be spiral separators) in the range of 180 to 360 degrees allow for sequential stages of transverse flow pattern development, attainment of steady state flow velocity and time for several circulatory passes to sweep particles to a desired position in the fluid flow. Other planar embodiments described herein include helical spirals.
Notable features of such a contemplated device include convenient inlet manifolds and outlet manifolds that include a bifurcating mechanism or splitter to split the fluid into particulate and effluent fluid streams. The contemplated embodiments also allow for a multiple stage device operative to output an extremely narrow band of particulates for further disposal or processing. Other parallel configuration embodiments and fabrication techniques therefore are contemplated. Also, a feedback and/or control system may be implemented with any of the presently described embodiments.
With reference now to
It should be appreciated that the fundamental operation of individual curved or spiral mixer devices such as device 200 or other devices contemplated herein, is described in detail in selected portions of the above referenced patent applications (which are incorporated herein by reference). Therefore, such operation will not be described herein except to the extent that such description will enhance the description of the presently described embodiments.
With reference now to
As shown in
In this regard, the presently described embodiments employ a spiral separator that uses the curved channel of a spiral device to introduce a centrifugal force upon particles such as neutrally buoyant particles (e.g. particles having substantially the same density as water, or the fluid in which the particles reside) flowing in a fluid, e.g. water, to facilitate improved separation of such particles from the fluid. The techniques for separating neutrally buoyant particles are particularly useful here. However, other separation techniques are contemplated as well. For example, some of these techniques utilize forces generated in the flow of the fluid in the curved channel to separate particles as a function of, for example, geometry of the channel and velocity. These forces include centrifugal forces and pressure driven forces, among others.
In the case of neutrally buoyant particles, as such particles flow through the channel, a tubular pinch effect causes the particles to flow in a tubular band. The introduced centrifugal force perturbs the tubular band (e.g. forces the tubular band to flow in a manner offset from a center of the channel), resulting in an asymmetric inertial migration of the band toward the inner wall of the channel. This force balance allows for focusing and compaction of suspended particulates into a narrow band for extraction. The separation principle contemplated herein implements a balance of the centrifugal and fluidic forces to achieve asymmetric inertial equilibrium near the inner sidewall. Angled impingement of the inlet stream towards the inner wall also allow for earlier band formation due to a Coanda effect where wall friction is used to attach the impinging flow. The migration could also be directed to the outer wall based on the selected operating regime.
Turning to
From spiral mixer 408, the mixed source water is provided to buffer tank 410. The source water is then controllably flowed, by use of valve 411, to spiral separator 412, which is located at a height H below buffer tank 410. This gravity-driven flow allows operation without pumping. In the spiral separator 412, the source water is separated and collected into effluent and waste streams. the effluent stream 414 being filtered further by filtering arrangement 416 and waste stream 418, is appropriately handled.
The Jar Test is a standard method used in the water industry to determine chemical dosage for clarification of source waters. Typical test volumes are 2 L with determined dosage being scaled up for the operational flow rates. The protocol for a standard Jar Test includes:
A modified Jar Test Protocol to test the presently described embodiments includes passage of the fluid through a spiral mixer before collection in the jar running the protocol:
It is understood that for small (sub-micron) particles diffusion driven (perikinetic) aggregation dominates over orthokinetic aggregation (shear driven). For perikinetic type of kinetics, a collision frequency between aggregates (or particles) is determined by the rate with which two diffusing particles find each other.
The rate for orthokinetic aggregation increases with the size of the particles, and for a typical shear rate of 1/s exceeds the perikinetic aggregation rate for particles in excess of 1 μm.
In a situation where a species of large particles (>1 μm) is mixed together with small particles (<1 μm), we observe two competing aggregation kinetics. The small particles will grow together at the perikinetic aggregation rate. At the same time, the larger particles will “sweep up” the smaller particles at the orthokinetic aggregation rate.
The presently described embodiments result in at least the following aspects:
It will be appreciated that several of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Also that various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
Cross Reference is hereby made to related patent applications, U.S. patent application Ser. No. [Atty. Dkt. No. 20090576-US-NP), filed [Unknown], by Lean et al., entitled, “Platform Technology For Industrial Separations”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. [20081254-US-NP], filed [Unknown], by Lean et al., entitled, “Stand-Alone Integrated Water Treatment System For Distributed Water Supply To Small Communities”; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. [Atty. Dkt. No. 20080169-US-NP], filed [Unknown], by Lean et al., entitled, “Method and Apparatus For Continuous Flow Membrane-Less Algae Dewatering”, the specifications of which are each incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.