Patent Grant
8994607
Spiral antennas often lend themselves to conformal applications however minimizing the profile of these antennas can lead to negative antenna performance. It is desirable to be able to lessen the profile of a spiral antenna without compromising its performance.
A spiral antenna apparatus utilizes a noise suppression sheet that is interposed between the spiral antenna element and its ground plane. The noise suppression sheet permits an extremely compact spiral antenna apparatus while lessening antenna performance degradation.
Spiral antenna engineers know that to achieve a unidirectional beam from a spiral antenna, a conducting cavity “behind” the spiral may be used. It is also known that as the distance between the spiral antenna element and the cavity is decreased below a quarter of the operating wavelength of the antenna, the performance characteristics of the antenna will substantially fall off. Under those conditions, circular polarization and gain can considerably suffer. It many cases, a “shallow” cavity-based spiral antenna apparatus is desirable as the apparatus can be made quite flexible and therefore be applied (adhered) directly to the surface of a vehicle such as an aircraft or marine vessel. Shallow cavity-based spiral antennas require however that measures be taken to enhance their operating characteristics.
The conformable antenna apparatus described herein utilizes a disc-shaped noise absorbing sheet that is interposed between a spiral antenna element and the ground plane of the antenna conducting cavity. The noise absorbing sheet may be designed to extend beyond the diameter of the spiral antenna element and can be placed either directly on the ground plane or in an intermediate position between the spiral antenna element and the ground plane. In either case, a spacer such as foam can be employed to position the noise suppressant sheet/spiral antenna element from the ground plane of the antenna apparatus.
Referring now to
Referring now to
A flexible spacer 24 is used to space the noise suppression sheet 18 from the antenna element 20. While a variety of spacer materials may be utilized, foam and particularly white foam lends itself to such an application as the white foam has properties much like that of air.
In this embodiment, an additional flexible foam spacer 26 is placed between conformable noise suppressant sheet 18 and conformable ground plane 22 to position the antenna element and noise suppression sheet at predetermined distance from ground plane 22. In this instance, the distance between antenna element 20 and ground plane 22 makes up the height of this cavity-based antenna apparatus.
The embodiment shown in
In
The noise suppression sheets used are commercially available and have magnetic permeability (mu) falling in the range of about 40 at 1 MHz to about 100 at 1 MHz. The absorbers used contain Fe and Si, one being of Fe—Si—Cr composition and another of Fe—Si—Al composition.
A test sheet of 0.5 millimeters thickness was used though thinner sheets are available and considered feasible as well. Additionally, one test version utilized a sheet with a hole but this was found to perform not as well as an un-perforated sheet.
The operational model depicted in
A version of the operation model used a double-noise material approach wherein the inner disc-shaped material had a magnetic permeability of 40 at 1 MHz and a surrounding outer co-planar ring-shaped noise suppression sheet having a magnetic permeability of 100 at 1 MHz.
Example materials are available through TDK such as their IRJ04 and IRJ09 flexible electromagnetic shield materials, respectively. Other manufacturers of similar materials are Mast Technologies of 6370 Nancy Ridge Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, Calif. 92121 U.S.A. identified as their MR51-0004-00 and MR51-0002-00 materials and Leader Tech of 14100 McCormack Drive, Tampa, Fla. 33626 U.S.A. identified as their EA 3200 material.
It was found that extending the absorber material beyond the maximum diameter of the spiral antenna element (when planar) was beneficial when using an 18 inch diameter spiral. Testing was additionally done of a six inch diameter spiral with absorbers of 7.5 inches diameter and 8 inches diameter (a twenty-five percent to 30 percent increase in diameter beyond that of the spiral antenna element).
It is to be understood that many additional changes in the details, materials, steps and arrangement of parts, which have been herein described and illustrated to explain the nature of the invention by way of example, may be made by those skilled in the art within the principle and scope of the invention as expressed in the appended claims.
This invention is assigned to the United States Government. Licensing inquiries may be directed to Office of Research and Technical Applications, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, Pacific, Code 72120, San Diego, Calif., 92152; telephone 619-553-2778; email: T2@spawar.navy.mil. Please reference Navy Case No. 100726.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5313216 | Wang et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5353040 | Yamada et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5453752 | Wang et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5508710 | Wang et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5589842 | Wang et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 6011522 | VanHoozen et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6121936 | Hemming et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6160522 | Sanford | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6198445 | Alt et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6285337 | West et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6822616 | Durham et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6906674 | McKinzie et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 7084827 | Strange et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7126548 | Yano et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7405709 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7629928 | Fabrega-Sanchez et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 8261997 | Gebhart | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8368615 | David et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
| 8497808 | Wang | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8665069 | Weitzhandler et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 20030076274 | Phelan et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20060176232 | Strange et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20080246680 | Rawnick et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20100007572 | Jones et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Saville, Paul, Review of Radar Absorbing Materials, Jan. 2005, pp. 15-17 & 35-41. |
