BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a valve assembly in accordance with the present invention for a split-cycle engine illustrating a washer valve of the assembly in an open position, a disc valve of the assembly in a closed position, and an unloading valve of the assembly in a closed position;
FIG. 2 is a schematic view of the valve assembly of FIG. 1 illustrating the washer valve in a closed position, the disc valve in an open position, and the unloading valve in a closed position;
FIG. 3 is a schematic view of the valve assembly of FIG. 1 illustrating the washer valve in a closed position, the disc valve in a closed position, and the unloading valve in an open position;
FIG. 4 is a disc valve concept of the Disc Valve Study illustrating the exhaust to crossover passage process;
FIG. 5 is a GT-Power Check Valve Characterization graph of discharge coefficient vs. AP of the Disc Valve Study;
FIG. 6 is a disc valve concept applied to a Split-Cycle Engine of the Disc Valve Study;
FIG. 7 is a graph of ITE vs. Piston-Head clearances for varying disc valve inlet maximum ΔP at 2400 rpm of the Disc Valve Study;
FIG. 8 is a graph of IMEP vs. Piston-Head Clearance for varying disc valve inlet maximum ΔP at 2400 rpm of the Disc Valve Study;
FIG. 9 is a graph of ITE of the Disc Valve Engine (having 0.1 mm P-H Clearance and 0.2 bar maximum disc valve inlet ΔP) vs. Non-Disc Split-Cycle Engine and Conventional Engine of the Disc Valve Study; and
FIG. 10 is a graph of IMEP of the Disc Valve Engine (having 0.1 mm P-H Clearance and 0.2 bar maximum disc valve inlet ΔP) vs. Non-Disc Split-Cycle Engine and Conventional Engine of the Disc Valve Study.