Fluid is commonly pumped though tubing inserted into a well to drill or to provide intervention services, such as stimulation or milling of obstructions. Means for pulsing this flow of fluid have been developed for a variety of applications, including mud pulse telemetry, well stimulation, enhanced drilling, and to extend the lateral range of drilling motors or other well intervention tools. For example, commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,237,701 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,139,219 disclose hydraulic impulse generators incorporating self-piloted poppet valves designed to periodically at least partially interrupt the flow of fluid at the bottom end of the tubing. At least partially interrupting the flow of fluid in this manner leads to an increase in pressure upstream of the valve and a decrease in pressure downstream of the valve.
Pressure pulsations in the tubing upstream of the bottomhole assembly (BHA) have a variety of beneficial effects. The pulsations can improve the performance of rotary drilling by applying a cyclical mechanical load on the bit and cyclic pressure load on the material being cut. In combination, these loads can enhance cutting. In addition, the pulsating vibrations induced by these tools in the tubing can reduce the friction required to feed the tubing into long deviated wells.
The valve also generates pressure fluctuations or pulses in the wellbore near the tool. These pressure pulses can enhance chemical placement in the formation and enhance the production of formation fluids such as oil or gas. In addition, these pulses can be employed to generate a signal that can be used for seismic processing.
The valve designs disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,237,701 and 7,139,219 generate a relatively short pressure pulse, which limits both pulse energy and the effectiveness of the pressure pulse. Commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/957,049 describes an improved apparatus that limits the pressure differential causing the valve to shift from the open to the closed position and incorporates flow restrictions that further limit the shift rate of the valve between the open and closed positions. The apparatus incorporates a spool valve with clearance seals between sliding valve parts. These clearance seals are wear areas, so that the clearance area at the seals may vary during the time that the valve is in service. When the valve is closed, a critical clearance seal area is subject to high differential pressure. Leakage across this clearance seal gap increases the shift speed and reduces the time that the valve stays closed. Close control of this timing is critical for effective operation of the valve. The clearance tolerance range required for acceptable operation is small, and there can be substantial variations in valve performance if the tolerance range is not met. Increased clearance causing increased fluid leakage through the seals is associated with reduced pulse amplitude and duration. Accordingly, it would be desirable to develop a seal that limits leakage in this area of the valve and provides longer pulses, resulting in more uniform pressure profiles.
Further, it would be desirable to increase the amplitude and duration of pulses produced by a hydraulic pulse valve. It would also be desirable to reduce the variability in the pulse profile caused by clearance variations and wear and to provide a reliable, debris-resistant means for adjusting the timing of the valve, i.e., the time required for the valve to move between the open and closed states.
This application specifically incorporates herein by reference the disclosures and drawings of each patent application and issued patent identified above or referenced as a related application.
In consideration of the discussion provided above, an exemplary hydraulic pulse valve has been developed for generating pressure pulses in a conduit in which the hydraulic pulse valve is disposed. The hydraulic pulse valve includes an elongate housing in which is disposed a valve assembly. The valve assembly includes a poppet that is reciprocally movable between a closed position in which it at least partially blocks a pressurized fluid from flowing through a throat of a poppet seat in the valve assembly, and an open position in which the pressurized fluid flows through the throat of the poppet seat. A reciprocating motion of the poppet between the closed position and the open position generates the pressure pulses in the conduit. Also included in the valve assembly is a pilot that is disposed within the poppet and reciprocates between disparate first and second positions to periodically alter fluid communication paths within the valve assembly. Alteration of the fluid communication paths causes the poppet to reciprocate between the closed position and the open position. A sliding seal in the hydraulic pulse valve controls leakage of a pressurized fluid through the valve assembly, preventing the pilot from prematurely shifting between the first position and the second position. Such premature shifting would cause the poppet to move to the open position too quickly, and the sliding seal thereby increases a time during which the poppet remains in the closed position.
The sliding seal includes a split ring that is actuated by a pressure differential between an inner surface and an outer surface of the split ring. The pressure differential produces a biasing force that causes the inner surface of the split ring to seal around an outer surface of a piston included within the poppet to limit pressurized fluid leakage along the outer surface of the piston where the seal is provided by the split ring. The split ring limits leakage of the pressurized fluid into a cavity defined at least in part by the pilot. As the pilot moves between the first and second positions relative to the split ring, the cavity moves past the split ring, and the split ring then no longer limits leakage of the pressurized fluid into the cavity.
The valve assembly further includes a spool housing in which the poppet and the pilot are disposed. The spool housing can comprise a stack of components that are clamped together.
A flow restriction can be provided that comprises a flat recess on a first component disposed adjacent to a flat surface on a second component. The flat recess and the flat surface together define a slit. The slit intersects a flow passage disposed within the valve assembly and limits a rate at which the pressurized fluid flows through the valve assembly to actuate the pilot to shift between the first and second positions. An opening defined by the slit is smaller in dimension than a diameter of the flow passage intersected by the slit, so that particulate matter that is small enough to pass through the slit will not plug the flow passage to prevent the pressurized fluid from flowing through the flow passage. The slit can be formed between a stop ring and a sleeve disposed around the piston.
The flow passage intersected by the slit can be employed to convey the pressurized fluid to a cavity in which the sliding seal is disposed. In some exemplary embodiments, the slit can be defined in part by a surface of a lower stop ring. In this embodiment, the slit can filter particulates from the pressurized fluid used to actuate the pilot.
Another aspect of this technology is directed to an exemplary method for generating pressure pulses in a conduit. This method comprises a procedure that is generally consistent with the functions carried out by the components of the hydraulic pulse valve discussed above.
This Summary has been provided to introduce a few concepts in a simplified form that are further described in detail below in the Description. However, this Summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Various aspects and attendant advantages of one or more exemplary embodiments and modifications thereto will become more readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figures and Disclosed Embodiments are not Limiting
Exemplary embodiments are illustrated in referenced Figures of the drawings. It is intended that the embodiments and Figures disclosed herein are to be considered illustrative rather than restrictive. No limitation on the scope of the technology and of the claims that follow is to be imputed to the examples shown in the drawings and discussed herein. Further, it should be understood that any feature of one embodiment disclosed herein can be combined with one or more features of any other embodiment that is disclosed, unless otherwise indicated.
The operation and configuration of a poppet valve and pilot shift mechanism in a hydraulic pulse valve are described in applicant's commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/957,049, which was filed on Nov. 30, 2010. The present application describes the design of an upper stop ring assembly to control the fluid flow that causes the pilot valve to shift between open and closed states, when generating pressure pulses.
Poppet assembly 12 comprises a piston 33 with a poppet 31 attached at its distal end by a nut 32, and a pilot bushing 34 attached at its proximal end with a nut 35. The poppet assembly moves up and down inside spool assembly 11. The spool assembly includes a poppet seat 13, a lower manifold 23, a lower stop ring 22, a sleeve 21, a female upper stop ring 20, a male upper stop ring 19, and an upper manifold 18. Female upper stop ring 20 limits the upward travel of piston 33, and lower stop ring 22 limits its downward travel within spool assembly 11. A clamp ring 14 is threadably engaged with upper adaptor 15 to securely clamp the components of the spool assembly inside the housing.
A pilot 36 slides inside poppet assembly 12, between an upper position and a lower position. In
Split ring 40 is preferably manufactured from a hard, non-abrasive material such as hard steel or coated with hard material or hardened to prevent wear and to reduce friction between the split ring and the surface of piston 33. The cross-sectional geometry of the split ring may also be varied to improve wear and reduce friction. In particular, the width of the outside surface of the ring and the width of the surface at the inside diameter may be varied to reduce contact pressure. Split ring 40 is provided to prevent pressurized fluid from cavity 51 leaking up though an annular clearance between piston 33 and male upper stop ring 19, through flow passage 52, and into cavity 53. In the absence of the sealing action of split ring 40, the leakage flow of fluid though the annular clearance would pressurize cavity 53, which would cause pilot 36 to start to shift position within piston 33 before the poppet attached to piston 33 is closed and would cause the poppet to open too quickly.
As shown in detail C of
Other configurations of the slit opening are possible. For example, the slit may be formed by grinding the proximal end of sleeve 21 instead of the distal surface of female upper stop ring 20.
A similar slit and orifice combination can be incorporated into lower stop ring 22 in order to filter particles that enter though this port from the fluid used to actuate the pilot. As shown in
As shown in a further alternative exemplary embodiment of
Furthermore, as shown in
Although the concepts disclosed herein have been described in connection with the preferred form of practicing them and modifications thereto, those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that many other modifications can be made thereto within the scope of the claims that follow. Accordingly, it is not intended that the scope of these concepts in any way be limited by the above description, but instead be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
This application is based on a prior copending provisional application, Ser. No. 61/581,017, filed on Dec. 28, 2011, the benefit of the filing date of which is hereby claimed under 35 U.S.C. §119(e), and is a continuation-in-part of a prior copending application, Ser. No. 12/957,049, filed Nov. 30, 2010, the benefit of the filing date of which is hereby claimed under 35 U.S.C. §120.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
699273 | Wolski | May 1902 | A |
1963090 | Jakosky | Jun 1934 | A |
2342732 | Gudmundsen | Feb 1944 | A |
2359629 | Dexter et al. | Oct 1944 | A |
2388741 | Hays | Nov 1945 | A |
2421769 | Wolfe | Jun 1947 | A |
2445803 | Rogers | Jul 1948 | A |
2492605 | Varney et al. | Dec 1949 | A |
2535079 | Lebert | Dec 1950 | A |
2543063 | Rodgers | Feb 1951 | A |
2562721 | Jakosky | Jul 1951 | A |
2562724 | Lebert | Jul 1951 | A |
2743083 | Zublin | Apr 1956 | A |
2855671 | Lundgren et al. | Oct 1958 | A |
2902258 | Hildebrandt | Sep 1959 | A |
2963099 | Gianelloni, Jr. | Dec 1960 | A |
3054595 | Kaufmann | Sep 1962 | A |
3058510 | Tiraspolsky et al. | Oct 1962 | A |
3065805 | Martini | Nov 1962 | A |
3433489 | Wiese | Mar 1969 | A |
3441094 | Galle et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3520225 | Baugh | Jul 1970 | A |
3568783 | Chenoweth et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3606410 | Inserra | Sep 1971 | A |
3648786 | Chenoweth | Mar 1972 | A |
3648789 | Eriksson | Mar 1972 | A |
3655424 | Orowan | Apr 1972 | A |
3728040 | Ioanesian et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3802515 | Flamand et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3810637 | Bonvin | May 1974 | A |
4033429 | Farr | Jul 1977 | A |
4114703 | Matson, Jr. et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4190202 | Yie | Feb 1980 | A |
4196911 | Matsushita | Apr 1980 | A |
4213332 | Bonomo et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4225000 | Maurer | Sep 1980 | A |
4246976 | McDonald, Jr. | Jan 1981 | A |
4324299 | Nagel | Apr 1982 | A |
4418721 | Holmes | Dec 1983 | A |
4437525 | O'Hanlon et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4440242 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4454935 | Pryor | Jun 1984 | A |
4493381 | Kajikawa et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4521167 | Cavalleri et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4529046 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4573637 | Pater et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4665997 | Maurer et al. | May 1987 | A |
4715538 | Lingnau | Dec 1987 | A |
4747544 | Kranzle | May 1988 | A |
4762277 | Pater et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4790393 | Larronde et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4817739 | Jeter | Apr 1989 | A |
4819745 | Walter | Apr 1989 | A |
4821961 | Shook | Apr 1989 | A |
4830122 | Walter | May 1989 | A |
4862043 | Zieve | Aug 1989 | A |
4863101 | Pater et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4887643 | Tomlin et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4890682 | Worrall et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4905775 | Warren et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4923120 | Hammelmann | May 1990 | A |
4925510 | Hojo et al. | May 1990 | A |
4928509 | Nakamura | May 1990 | A |
4934254 | Clark et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4979577 | Walter | Dec 1990 | A |
4997159 | Yoshino et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5000516 | Kolle et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5009272 | Walter | Apr 1991 | A |
5028004 | Hammelmann | Jul 1991 | A |
5051020 | Schleicher | Sep 1991 | A |
5121537 | Matsui et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5190114 | Walter | Mar 1993 | A |
5191557 | Rector et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5222425 | Davies | Jun 1993 | A |
5279262 | Muehleck | Jan 1994 | A |
5382760 | Staron et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5396965 | Hall et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5586084 | Barron et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5603385 | Colebrook | Feb 1997 | A |
5685487 | Ellis | Nov 1997 | A |
5703421 | Durkin | Dec 1997 | A |
5740127 | Van Steenwyk et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5803188 | McInnes | Sep 1998 | A |
5909848 | Zink | Jun 1999 | A |
5909879 | Simpson | Jun 1999 | A |
5938206 | Klosterman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950736 | Goldstein | Sep 1999 | A |
5953809 | Kowalski | Sep 1999 | A |
6027040 | Frye-Hammelmann | Feb 2000 | A |
6053261 | Walter | Apr 2000 | A |
6062311 | Johnson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6094401 | Masak et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6191511 | Zysset | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6237701 | Kolle et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6263969 | Stoesz et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6301766 | Kolle | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6347675 | Kolle | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6394221 | Cosma | May 2002 | B2 |
6453996 | Carmichael et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6557856 | Azibert et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6774519 | Pullen et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6952068 | Gieras et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6964270 | Janssen et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7139219 | Kolle et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7198456 | Kolle et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201238 | Marvin et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7310580 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7524160 | Kolle et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
20010030486 | Pijanowski | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20040069530 | Prain et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050178558 | Kolle et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20080267011 | Pratt et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20120132289 | Kolle | May 2012 | A1 |
20130000917 | Slack et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1568680 | Jun 1980 | DE |
587240 | Oct 1972 | SU |
Entry |
---|
Borland et al., “Drill Bit Seismic, Vertical Seismic Profiling, and Seismic Depth Imaging to Aid Drilling Decisions in the Tho Tinh Structure Nam Con Son Basin—Vietnam,” Butsuri-Tansa vol. 51, No. 1: 27-44, 1998. |
Kolle, Jack K., “A Comparison of Water Jet, Abrasive Jet and Rotary Diamond Drilling in Hard Rock,” Presentation for Energy Sources Technology Conference & Exhibition (ETCE '98), Houston, TX: 6pp., Feb. 2-4, 1998. |
Kolle, Jack K., “Moving an Ice Mountain,” Mechanical Engineering: 49-53, Feb. 1990. |
Park, Choon Byong; Miller, Richard D.; Steeples, Don W.; and Black, Ross A. “Swept impact seismic techniques (SIST),” Geophysics. vol. 61. No. 6 (Nov.-Dec. 1996): p. 1789-1803. 13 FIGs. |
Rector et al., “The use of drill-bit energy as a downhole seismic source,” Geophysics vol. 56. No. 5:628-634, May 1991. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, Apr. 22, 2013, 2 pages; International Search Report, 3 pages; and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130112427 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61581017 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12957049 | Nov 2010 | US |
Child | 13727482 | US |