This disclosure relates to split winglet lateral control of an aerial vehicle, such as a plane.
Aircraft generally need control in each of the pitch, roll and yaw axes, conventionally mapping to elevator, aileron and rudder. In traditional aircraft, the elevator and rudder are located on the tail of the aircraft. In very lightweight aircraft, tails themselves are a mass and drag burden. Simultaneously, aircraft with very high aspect ratio main wings make it difficult to reach the appropriate vertical tail volume coefficient due to the very large moment potential in large span wings. Aircraft commonly use winglets to distend tip vortices and recover thrust with less than commensurate weight and wing bending moment penalty.
One aspect of the disclosure provides a winglet including a winglet body and a control body. The winglet body includes a first winglet surface arranged to face away from an attached wing and a second winglet surface arranged opposite the first winglet surface to face toward the attached wing. The second winglet surface is joined to the first winglet surface to form a front edge of the winglet body and a trailing edge of the winglet body. The second winglet surface defines a control body seat. The control body is coupled to the winglet body to move between a stowed position seated in the control body seat and a deployed position rotated out of the control body seat. The control body includes a first control surface arranged to face toward the winglet body, a second control surface arranged opposite the first control surface to face away from the winglet body and joined to the first control surface to form a trailing edge of the control body and a control front connecting the first control surface and the second control surface.
Implementations of the disclosure may include one or more of the following optional features. In some implementations, the winglet includes a hinge mounted at a junction of the control front and the first control surface. The hinge may allow rotation of the control body relative to the winglet body. When the control body is in the deployed position, the trailing edge of the control body may be spaced from the trailing edge of the winglet body. When the control body is in the stowed position, the trailing edge of the control body may be substantially coincident with the trailing edge of the winglet body. When the control body is in the stowed position, the first control surface and the second winglet surface may form a substantially continuous surface. In some examples, when the control body is in the stowed position, the second control surface is approximately adjacent to a chord line of the winglet body.
The winglet may include an actuator housed by the winglet body and configured to move the control body between the stowed position and the deployed position. In some implementations, the second winglet surface defines the control body seat as recess complementary to a size and shape of the control body. When the control body is in the stowed position, the second control surface of the control body may be substantially co-planar with the second winglet surface of the winglet body. The second winglet surface may define the control body seat rearward of the front edge of the winglet body and inside a chord line of the winglet body. In some examples, the winglet includes a solar panel disposed on one or more of the first winglet surface, the second winglet surface, or the second control surface.
Another aspect of the disclosure provides a wing assembly including a wing having a proximal end and a distal end, a winglet attached to the distal end of the wing and a control body. The winglet includes a winglet body including a first winglet surface arranged to face away from the wing and a second winglet surface arranged opposite the first winglet surface to face toward the wing. The second winglet surface is joined to the first winglet surface to form a front edge of the winglet body and a trailing edge of the winglet body. The second winglet surface defines a control body seat. This aspect may include one or more of the following optional features. The control body is coupled to the winglet body to move between a stowed position seated in the control body seat and a deployed position rotated out of the control body seat and over the wing. The control body includes a first control surface arranged to face toward the winglet body, a second control surface arranged opposite the first control surface to face away from the winglet body and joined to the first control surface to form a trailing edge of the control body, and a control front connecting the first control surface and the second control surface.
Implementations of the disclosure may include one or more of the following optional features. In some implementations, the winglet includes a hinge mounted at a junction of the control front and the first control surface. The hinge may allow rotation of the control body relative to the winglet body. When the control body is in the deployed position, the trailing edge of the control body is spaced from the trailing edge of the winglet body. When the control body is in the stowed position, the trailing edge of the control body is substantially coincident with the trailing edge of the winglet body. In some examples, when the control body is in the stowed position, the first control surface and the second winglet surface forms a substantially continuous surface. In addition, when the control body is in the stowed position, the second control surface may be approximately adjacent to a chord line of the winglet body.
In some implementations, the winglet further includes an actuator housed by the winglet body and configured to move the control body between the stowed position and the deployed position. The second winglet surface may define the control body seat as recess complementary to a size and shape of the control body. When the control body is in the stowed position, the second control surface of the control body may be substantially co-planar with the second winglet surface of the winglet body. The second winglet may define the control body seat rearward of the front edge of the winglet body and inside a chord line of the winglet body. When the control body is in the deployed position, the control body and the trailing edge of the control body may be located over the wing. In some examples, the winglet includes a solar panel disposed on one or more of the first winglet surface, the second winglet surface, or the second control surface. The wing may further define a wing longitudinal axis and the winglet may define a winglet longitudinal axis. The winglet may be arranged with respect to the wing to have the winglet longitudinal axis substantially perpendicular to the wing longitudinal axis.
The details of one or more implementations of the disclosure are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other aspects, features, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
Yaw control of an aircraft using a traditional rudder may be disadvantageous, as the rudder may increase the frontal drag area of the aircraft and may increase the total aircraft weight. Some aircraft may use a split aileron to provide yaw control in place of a traditional rudder. Winglets provide aerodynamic advantages and may allow a wing to be more efficient. This idea presents a means for controlling the yaw of the aircraft with a coordinated yaw roll moment created by a split winglet.
One advantage of this configuration is that the low pressure region 240 creates drag without adding additional lift due in part to the containment of the low pressure region 240 on the bottom by the wing 110, and this configuration does not create uncoordinated motion about the roll axis 104. This allows the aircraft 100 to generate a motion about the yaw axis 106 without a substantial change in the roll axis 104, effectively decoupling the yaw and roll motion. This may be advantageous for aircraft 100 that need to remain relatively level while orbiting. This may result in a reduction in the amount of movement required for certain payloads, thus reducing the weight of the aircraft 100 and increasing flight time or efficiency. For example, with a beam communication link, allowing the aircraft 100 to remain relatively level while orbiting a location reduces the amount of motion required for the transmitter to move in the roll axis 104, resulting in less weight. In some examples, the gimbal or motion system is eliminated due to the consistent wings level nature of the turn created about the roll axis 104.
In aircraft 100 with powerful aileron control about the roll axis 104, the wing 110 upper and lower surfaces may have lift coefficients matched to their (disparate) span wise flowfield velocities. When a large aileron is activated the upward deflecting aileron enters the low pressure region 240 and the downward defecting aileron enters the high pressure region 242, resulting in a disproportionate amount of drag at each ends of the wings 110. The winglet 200 may deploy the control body 220 to counter act the disproportionate drag, which allows for better roll control without upsetting the aircraft 100 through the use of a rudder 170. For aircraft 100 with weak roll control, such as aircraft with high wing dihedral, the lateral control must generally be strong enough to deliver sufficient beta or roll moment about the roll axis 104 to overcome the tendency of the wing 110 to return to level from dihedral. The long moment arm between a center of the aircraft 100 (e.g., the yaw axis 106) and the winglet 200 and draft created by the control body 220 increases the motion about the yaw axis 106 without additional structure. In high aspect ratio aircraft 100, such as tailless aircraft or flying wings, the winglet 200 and control body 220 allows a high deferral or high stability wing 110 to be used while still providing adequate control in the yaw axis 106 due to the large moment. This is advantageous by allowing for the elimination of part and/or all of the fuselage 120, the elevator, 160, the rudder 170, or tail structure, thus providing weight savings and increased stability of the aircraft 100.
Unlike a winglet 200 where when the control body 220 is deployed there is a hole or void allowing air to pass between the high pressure region 242 and low pressure region 240 through the winglet 200 that creates a change in lift in for the wing 110, the winglet 200 and the control body 220 in the examples shown does not increase the lift of the wing 110 significantly or create a significant uncoordinated motion along the roll axis 104. In some examples, the winglet 200 and the control body 220 may decrease the lift of the wing 110 resulting in a coordinated roll moment about the roll axis 104. Unlike a control body 220 that deflects outward away from the wing 110 that may generate lift due in part to an increase in the low pressure region 240 similar to an increase in wingspan, this design does not substantially result in an increase in lift for the wing 110 or result in uncoordinated motion along the roll axis 104. Further, unlike a control body 220 that is split or multiple control bodies 220 that deflect outwardly away from the wing 110 and inwardly towards the wing 110 resulting in an increase in lift similar to an increase in wingspan, this design does not create significant additional lift of the wing or uncoordinated motion along the roll axis 104. Unlike a split aileron, which controls motion about the roll axis 104 and yaw axis 106 by requiring movement of two control surfaces individually, the winglet 200 only requires one control body 220 to be moved to obtain yaw control and does not interfere with roll control allowing for a simpler and weight advantageous system. Unlike a split flap, which controls total wing lift and drag on both sides of a wing 110, the winglet 200 only creates drag and decreases lift, allowing rotation about the yaw axis 106 and does not create aircraft 100 instability as would a split flap system operated non-symmetrically. Further, unlike split flaps, split ailerons, ailerons, flaps, speed brakes, and/or dives brakes, etc. used to increase the total drag of an aircraft 100, these do not create an uncoordinated motion about the yaw axis 106 intentionally and non-symmetrical operation would result in aircraft instability, the winglet 200 and control body 220 provide control about the yaw axis 106 and allow for non-symmetrical operation without causing aircraft 100 instability.
A number of implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.