This is a National Phase Application filed under 35 U.S.C. 371 as a national stage of PCT/EP2016/081558, filed Dec. 16, 2016, an application claiming the benefit of European Application No. 15200683.9, filed Dec. 17, 2015, the content of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates to a splitter plate arrangement for a wind turbine blade having trailing edge serrations.
Wind power is increasingly popular due to its clean and environmentally friendly production of energy. The rotor blades of modern wind turbines capture kinetic wind energy by using sophisticated blade design created to maximise efficiency. However, complaints have arisen about the creation of noise associated with the operation of wind power plants. Hence, noise reducing devices and associated blade designs are increasingly desired.
To this end, modern wind turbine blades are sometimes provided with serrations along the blade trailing edges, in an effort to reduce blade trailing edge noise and/or to improve wind turbine blade efficiency, as can be seen in EP1314885. While the noise mitigating properties of such serrations are advantageous, several drawbacks remain. Often, finding the right serration geometry is a trade-off between noise mitigation performance and structural requirements. This may lead to the need for thick trailing edge regions, especially near the serration base. This increased thickness has been found by the present inventions to become a potential source of additional noise.
With reference to
US 2012/027590 A1 discloses a wind turbine blade provided with noise reducer features that are arranged on the surface of the wind turbine blade such that they form serrations. Some embodiments include first noise reduction features and second noise reduction features. US 2012/027590 A1 does not disclose any particular shape, orientation or dimensions of these particular features.
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a wind turbine blade having an improved trailing edge configuration.
It is another object of the invention to provide a wind turbine blade design having serrations, which design provides improved noise reduction during operation.
In particular, it is an object of the present invention to mitigate noise caused by serrations arranged on a wind turbine blade.
Accordingly, there is provided a wind turbine blade having a profiled contour including a pressure side and a suction side, and a leading edge and a trailing edge with a chord having a chord length extending therebetween, the wind turbine blade extending in a spanwise between a root end and a tip end, the wind turbine blade comprising a plurality of serrations provided along at least a portion of the trailing edge of the blade,
It has been surprisingly found that fitting the relatively thick serration base region with at least one splitter plate is a simple and efficient solution to mitigate the formation and interaction of periodic coherent turbulent structures. These are usually shed from a sufficiently thick trailing edge and may become the source of additional noise. Preferably, the splitter plate is comparatively thin, having a thickness of 2.0 mm or less, more preferably 1.5 mm or less, most preferably 1.0 mm or less.
Preferably, the splitter plate has a thickness that is less than the thickness of at least part of the adjacent serrations. It has also been found that the noise mitigating effect of the splitter plate arrangement allows for thicker base regions of the serrations. This results in increased design freedom for the serrations and associated material requirements. For instance, less stiff materials, offering edgewise elasticity, which is desired, could be used for the serrations with increased thicknesses, compensating for flexibility in that way. This may reduce material costs in that less costly materials can be used. Also, it increases the robustness of the device, lowering potential maintenance costs, while still maintaining the noise mitigation properties of the arrangement.
According to one advantageous embodiment, the one or more splitter plates are arranged between, and preferably connected to, adjacent serrations. The splitter plates may for instance be connected between a first sidewall of a first serration and a second sidewall of a second serration.
In another advantageous embodiment, sidewalls of the serrations have a sidewall thickness and a plate thickness of the splitter plate is less than the sidewall thickness. The ratio of the sidewall thickness and the plate thickness may for instance be at least 2:1, or at least 5:2, or at least 3:1.
The splitter plate may have a substantially uniform thickness.
Advantageously, the splitter plate should have a triangular, parallelogram or kite geometry, offering the same or similar principle of slanted trailing edge of regular serrations, for maintaining the noise mitigation properties of the arrangement. Preferably, it extends to no more than half the total length of the serration teeth. The splitter plate may be as thin as possible, as it is bound by the same structural requirements as the serrations.
In a preferred embodiment, the splitter plate comprises a vertex, preferably an acute angle vertex, extending into said space in between adjacent serrations. It has been found that such arrangement results in particularly efficient noise mitigation. Advantageously, the acute angle could be substantially identical to the acute angle at the apex of the respective serrations.
According to another embodiment, the serrations and the splitter plates define respective planes which are oriented substantially parallel to each other. This means planes, which are either parallel or arranged at an angle of not more than 15°, preferably not more than 10°, to each other. In case of serrations tapering towards their apex end, the plane of the splitter plates is preferably oriented at an angle to the top surface and to the bottom surface of the serrations, i.e. the respective suction and pressure sides of the serrations, such that the angle between the plane defined by the serration top surface and the plane of the splitter plate equals the angle between the plane defined by the serration bottom surface and the plane of the splitter plate.
According to another embodiment, the serrations comprise a base proximal to the trailing edge of the blade and an apex distal to the trailing edge of the blade with a notional line extending from a midpoint of the base to the apex defining a height H of the serration and wherein the at least one splitter plate extends into a space in between adjacent serrations to a distance of 60% or less, preferably 50% or less, of the height H of said trailing edge serrations. It has been found by the present inventors that the splitter plates advantageously have a length sufficient to disrupt the formation of periodic coherent turbulent structures, i.e. more than a wavelength of such structures. The above mentioned distances have been found to meet this requirement. Preferably, one or more splitter plates extend into a space in between adjacent serrations to a distance of 50% or less, such as 40% or less, or 30% or less, of the height H of said serrations.
According to a preferred embodiment, said serrations are arranged at incidence to the flow over the wind turbine blade, i.e. at an angle to the flow direction over the blade at the trailing edge of the blade. In one aspect, said serrations are angled towards the pressure side of the wind turbine blade. Preferably, said serrations are angled to the flow direction over the wind turbine blade at an angle of between 0-45 degrees to the flow direction, preferably between 1-25 degrees. This may advantageous increase the lift of the blade.
It is also preferred that the splitter plates are arranged at incidence to the flow over the wind turbine blade. In one aspect, the splitter plates are angled towards the pressure side of the wind turbine blade. Preferably, the splitter plates are angled to the flow direction over the wind turbine blade at an angle of between 0-45 degrees to the flow direction, preferably between 1-25 degrees.
According to one embodiment, said splitter plates are formed integrally with said serrations. This could be accomplished by integrally moulding the serrations and splitter plates.
According to another embodiment, said splitter plates are provided as add-on elements arranged to be attached to said serrations. In one embodiment, said splitter plates are attached to said serrations using adhesive bonding and/or a snap-fit or clip-on interlocking connection. In another embodiment, the serrations may contain one or more slits into which part of the splitter plates may be inserted for subsequent fastening.
Preferably, the thickness of the splitter plate is 2.0 mm or less, preferably 1.5 mm or less, such as 1.0 mm or less. It has been found that the splitter plates can be comparatively thin as compared to the serrations.
According to a preferred embodiment, the splitter plate comprises a parallelogram shaped surface, preferably two opposing parallelogram shaped surfaces. Even more preferred, the splitter plate comprises two opposing diamond shaped surfaces. Thus, both the top surface and the bottom surface of the splitter plate, as separated by a thickness of e.g. less than 2.0 mm, are shaped like a parallelogram or a diamond. This design has the advantage that it enables an easy and efficient attachment of the splitter plates in between adjacent serrations, while the desired noise mitigation is provided.
It is preferred that an acute angle of the diamond shaped surface extends into the space between adjacent serrations.
According to yet another embodiment, the splitter plate comprises a kite shaped surface, preferably two opposed kite shaped surfaces. According to an alternative embodiment, the splitter plate comprises a triangular shaped surface, preferably two opposing triangular shaped surfaces.
According to a preferred embodiment, the splitter plate has uniform thickness. In addition, the serrations may have a substantially uniform thickness. The serrations may e.g. be formed of a panel attached to the blade or sandwiched between a pressure side shell part and a suction side shell part. Alternatively, the serrations may comprise a top and a bottom surface tapering towards each other at their respective apex ends.
According to another embodiment, the splitter plate comprises one or more slits and/or holes, advantageously extending along the height of the serration, e.g. from the distal part of the splitter plate. This embodiment was found to reduce loads on the inventive arrangement, as increased by the added area as compared to prior art serrations. Advantageously, the slits of the splitter plate have a width of 0.2 mm to 2.0 mm.
According to another embodiment, the splitter plate comprises a comb-like structure. Preferably, the comb-like structure is a stiff structure. Preferably, the splitter plates are formed from a plastic material.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to a serrated panel for a wind turbine blade, wherein the panel is arranged to be attached to the trailing edge of a blade to form a plurality of serrations at the trailing edge of the blade,
In yet another aspect, the present invention relates to a wind turbine comprising at least one wind turbine blade of the present invention.
As used herein, the term “splitter plate” refers to a plate-shaped component to control aerodynamic flow in between and/or in the vicinity of the serrations. Usually, a splitter plate will have a uniform thickness throughout its entire length-width extension. In some embodiments the splitter plate may comprise a rigid plate.
As used herein, the term “diamond shaped” refers to a surface with the shape of a rhombus or rhomb, also known as equilateral parallelogram. Also, the term “kite shaped” refers to a surface with the shape of a quadrilateral whose four sides can be grouped into two pairs of equal-length sides that are adjacent to each other.
As used herein, planes which are oriented substantially parallel to each other means planes which are either parallel or arranged at an angle of not more than 15°, preferably not more than 10° to each other, most preferably not more than 5° to each other.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
It will be understood that elements common to the different embodiments of the invention have been provided with the same reference numerals in the drawings.
The airfoil region 34 (also called the profiled region) has an ideal or almost ideal blade shape with respect to generating lift, whereas the root region 30 due to structural considerations has a substantially circular or elliptical cross-section, which for instance makes it easier and safer to mount the blade 10 to the hub. The diameter (or the chord) of the root region 30 is typically constant along the entire root area 30. The transition region 32 has a transitional profile 42 gradually changing from the circular or elliptical shape 40 of the root region 30 to the airfoil profile 50 of the airfoil region 34. The chord length of the transition region 32 typically increases substantially linearly with increasing distance r from the hub.
The airfoil region 34 has an airfoil profile 50 with a chord extending between the leading edge 18 and the trailing edge 20 of the blade 10. The width of the chord decreases with increasing distance r from the hub.
It should be noted that the chords of different sections of the blade normally do not lie in a common plane, since the blade may be twisted and/or curved (i.e. pre-bent), thus providing the chord plane with a correspondingly twisted and/or curved course, this being most often the case in order to compensate for the local velocity of the blade being dependent on the radius from the hub.
Airfoil profiles are often characterised by the following parameters: the chord length c, the maximum camber f, the position df of the maximum camber f, the maximum airfoil thickness t, which is the largest diameter of the inscribed circles along the median camber line 62, the position dt of the maximum thickness t, and a nose radius (not shown). These parameters are typically defined as ratios to the chord length c. Thus, a local relative blade thickness t/c is given as the ratio between the local maximum thickness t and the local chord length c. Further, the position dp of the maximum pressure side camber may be used as a design parameter, and of course also the position of the maximum suction side camber.
The wind turbine blade 10 generally comprises a shell made of fibre-reinforced polymer, and is typically made as a pressure side or upwind shell part 24 and a suction side or downwind shell part 26 that are glued together along bond lines 28 extending along the trailing edge 20 and the leading edge 18 of the blade 10. Wind turbine blades are generally formed from fibre-reinforced plastics material, e.g. glass fibres and/or carbon fibres which are arranged in a mould and cured with a resin to form a solid structure. Modern wind turbine blades can often be in excess of 30 or 40 metres in length, having blade root diameters of several metres. Wind turbine blades are generally designed for relatively long lifetimes and to withstand considerable structural and dynamic loading.
With reference to
In the embodiment shown in
As is best seen in the perspective drawing of
In the embodiment illustrated in
While the splitter plates 106 may be formed integrally as part of the serrations 100, e.g. as part of a moulding process, in further aspects the splitter plates 106 may be provided as separate add-on elements which can be attached to serrations 100. The add-ons may be provided as slotted elements which can be slid onto a serration from the end of the serration, and may be secured to the serration using any suitable means, e.g. adhesive bonding and/or a mechanical clip-on or snap-fit connection, based on interlocking elements provided on the serration and the add-ons.
The splitter plates of the present invention may comprises one or more slits and/or holes. An example embodiment of this is shown in
The invention is not limited to the embodiments described herein, and may be modified or adapted without departing from the scope of the present invention. The shape of the splitter plate may for instance take many different shapes such as a flat or smooth distal part. Further, the splitter plate may be designed with for instance two or three apex points (or smaller serrations) instead of the shown one apex point.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
15200683 | Dec 2015 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2016/081558 | 12/16/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/103192 | 6/22/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
175355 | King | Mar 1876 | A |
573562 | Wittram | Dec 1896 | A |
1861065 | Poot | May 1932 | A |
RE19412 | Zaparaka | Jan 1935 | E |
2071012 | Adams | Feb 1937 | A |
2238749 | Peltier | Apr 1941 | A |
D131271 | Collura | Feb 1942 | S |
2616509 | Thomas | Nov 1952 | A |
4089618 | Patel | May 1978 | A |
4618313 | Mosiewicz | Oct 1986 | A |
5088665 | Vijgen | Feb 1992 | A |
5320491 | Coleman | Jun 1994 | A |
5522266 | Nicholson | Jun 1996 | A |
5533865 | Dassen | Jul 1996 | A |
5819357 | Gould | Oct 1998 | A |
6491260 | Borchers | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6733240 | Gliebe | May 2004 | B2 |
6779978 | Camargo Do Amarante | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7059833 | Stiesdal | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7351041 | Uselton | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7413408 | Tafoya | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7632068 | Bak | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7976283 | Huck | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8414261 | Bonnet | Apr 2013 | B2 |
9341158 | Smith | May 2016 | B2 |
9458821 | Jacobsen | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9494134 | Kinzie | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9581133 | Yao | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9605649 | Mehdi | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9638164 | Vedula | May 2017 | B2 |
9849976 | Piechowicz | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10011346 | Beckman | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10099773 | Beckman | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10227963 | Van Garrel | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10240576 | Drack | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10259562 | Beckman | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10259574 | Beckman | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10286996 | Lacy | May 2019 | B2 |
10301942 | Joseph | May 2019 | B2 |
10400744 | Herrig | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10421533 | Domel | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10460717 | Beckman | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10465652 | Wetzel | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10690110 | Church | Jun 2020 | B2 |
20030175121 | Shibata | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040253114 | Gunneskov | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070025858 | Driver | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041823 | Miller | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070065290 | Herr | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077150 | Llorente Gonzalez | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080080977 | Bonnet | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080107540 | Bonnet | May 2008 | A1 |
20080166241 | Herr | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187442 | Standish | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080298967 | Matesanz Gil | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090016891 | Parsania | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090074585 | Koegler | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090104038 | Grabau | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100104436 | Herr | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100260614 | Fuglsang | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100329879 | Presz, Jr. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110018282 | Hayashi | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110142637 | Riddell | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110223030 | Huck | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120027590 | Bonnet | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120057984 | Fuglsang | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20140286784 | Singh | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2497739 | Jun 2013 | GB |
2013045601 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2014048437 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO-2014048437 | Apr 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report dated May 27, 2016 in corresponding European Patent Application No. EP 15200683.9. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200277931 A1 | Sep 2020 | US |