Spoked bicycle wheel

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6491350
  • Patent Number
    6,491,350
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 9, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 10, 2002
    21 years ago
Abstract
A spoked bicycle wheel includes a rim, a hub having first and second axially spaced apart anchoring portions and a plurality of spokes connected between the rim and the anchoring portions. A first set of spokes is anchored to the first anchoring portions and a second set of spokes is anchored to the second anchoring portions. The spokes of the first set are greater in number than the spokes of the second set.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a rear bicycle wheel.





FIG. 1

of the annexed drawings illustrates a rear wheel of a known type mounted on the frame of a bicycle


10


having two fork-shaped arms


12


provided at their bottom ends with seats, designated generically by


14


, for fixing of a pin defining an axis


16


of transverse rotation. The rear wheel, designated as a whole by


18


, comprises a rim


20


having a median plane


22


set in a central position with respect to the arms


12


and the seats


14


for attachment of the frame


10


. The wheel


18


comprises a hub


24


that carries a set of sprockets


26


set coaxially with the hub


24


. The rim


20


and the hub


24


are connected together by means of one first set of spokes and one second set of spokes, designated, respectively, by


28




a


and


28




b.


The spokes


28




a


of the first set are anchored along one side of the hub


24


adjacent to the sprocket set


26


, whilst the spokes


28




b


of the second set are anchored to the hub


24


on the side of the latter further away from the sprocket set


26


.




On account of the encumbrance of the sprocket set


26


in the direction of the transverse axis


16


, the spokes


28




a,




28




b


have a different inclination with respect to the median plane


22


of the wheel


18


. In

FIG. 1

, the angles of inclination of the spokes


28




a


and


28




b


with respect to the median plane


22


are designated, respectively, by α and β. The difference between the angles α and β is greater, the greater is the axial encumbrance of the sprocket set


26


.




In traditional solutions, the fact that the spokes


28




a


and


28




b


have a different inclination with respect to the median plane


22


means that the said spokes are subjected to different tensioning forces. In particular, the tensioning force of the spokes


28




a


will have to be considerably higher than the tensioning force of the spokes


28




b


in order to keep the rim


20


centred with respect to the median plane


22


of the wheel. If the mean tensioning forces of the spokes


28




a


and


28




b


are respectively designated by F


a


and F


b


, in order to have correct centring of the rim


20


with respect to the median plane


22


, the components of these forces in the direction parallel to the axis of rotation of the wheel must be equal and opposite to one another.




The main drawback of the known solution previously described lies in the fact that the spokes of the wheel that are adjacent to the sprocket set undergo a very high tensioning force and are much more subject to the risk of failure as compared to the spokes located on the side of the wheel opposite to the sprocket set.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The purpose of the present invention is to provide a rear bicycle wheel that is free from the aforementioned drawback.




In accordance with the present invention, the above purpose is achieved by a bicycle wheel having the characteristics that form the subject of the main claim.




The characteristics and advantages of the present invention will emerge clearly from the ensuing detailed description, which is provided purely by way of non-limiting example, with reference to the attached drawings in which:











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

already described previously, is a partial axial section of a rear wheel mounted on the frame of a bicycle;





FIG. 2

is a perspective view of an embodiment of a wheel according to the invention; and





FIG. 3

is a partial perspective view of the wheel according to the invention.











In

FIGS. 2 and 3

the items corresponding to the ones previously described are designated by the same reference numbers.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




In the wheel


18


according to the present invention the spokes


28




a


of the first set are greater in number than the spokes


28




b


of the second set. In the embodiment illustrated in the figures, the spokes


28




a


are twice as many as the spokes


28




b


of the second set. Preferably, the spokes


28




a


and


28




b


are grouped together in a plurality of sets of three spokes


30


set at equal distances apart. Each set of three spokes


30


comprises two spokes of the first set


28




a


and one spoke of the second set


28




b,


the latter being in a central position between the respective two spokes of the first set


28




a.


The two spokes


28




a


of each set of three spokes


30


are preferably parallel to one another, and the spoke


28




b


of the same set of three spokes


30


is contained in a radial plane equidistant from the spokes


28




a.


The ways in which the spokes


28




a,




28




b


are fixed to the hub


24


and to the rim


20


may be of any type whatsoever.




As may be seen in

FIG. 2

, the wheel


18


assumes, from the aesthetic point of view, the configuration of a “spoked” wheel, in which, in actual fact, each spoke is made up of a set of three spokes


30


. The number of sets of three spokes


30


may be varied with respect to the embodiment illustrated in FIG.


2


. For example, wheels may be built having 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 “spokes”, i.e., sets of three spokes, having, respectively 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, and 30 spokes in all.




The solution according to the present invention substantially enables the tensioning force of the spokes


28




a


to be halved with respect to that of the spokes of the second set


28




b,


with a consequent considerable reduction in the risk of failure of the spokes adjacent to the sprockets, which, in traditional solutions, are more subject to failure.




Of course, without prejudice to the principle of the invention, the details of construction and the embodiments may be varied widely with respect to what is described and illustrated herein purely by way of example, without thereby departing from the scope of the present invention as defined in the ensuing claims.



Claims
  • 1. A spoked wheel for a bicycle comprising a rim, a hub and a plurality of spokes connected to the rim and the hub at opposite ends of the spokes, wherein a first set of spokes is anchored to a first anchoring portion of the hub and a second set of spokes is anchored to a second anchoring portion of the hub spaced from the first anchoring portion, wherein the spokes of the first set have twice as many spokes as the second set, wherein the spokes are grouped in sets of three spokes set at equal distances apart, each set of three spokes comprising two spokes of the first set and one spoke of the second set and wherein the spokes of the first set of each set of three spokes are substantially parallel to one another.
  • 2. A wheel according to claim 1 wherein the spoke of the second set of each set of three spokes is contained in a radial plane set in a central position with respect to the spokes of the first set of the same set of three spokes.
  • 3. A spoked wheel for a bicycle comprising a rim, a hub and a plurality of spokes connected to the rim and the hub at opposite ends of the spokes, wherein a first set of spokes is anchored to a first anchoring portion of the hub and a second set of spokes is anchored to a second anchoring portion of the hub spaced from the first anchoring portion, wherein the spokes of the first set are twice as many as the spokes of the second set and wherein the tensioning force of the spokes of the first set is approximately half that of the tensioning force of the spokes of the second set.
  • 4. A spoked wheel according to claim 3, wherein said spokes are grouped in sets of three spokes.
  • 5. A spoked wheel according to claim 4, wherein the spokes of each set of three spokes are at equal distances apart.
  • 6. A spoked wheel according to claim 4, wherein each set of three spokes comprises two spokes of the first set and one spoke of the second set.
  • 7. A spoked wheel according to claim 4, wherein the spokes of the first set of each set of three spokes extend on opposite sides of a plane containing the spoke of the second set and the hub axis.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
TO00A1007 Oct 2000 IT
US Referenced Citations (40)
Number Name Date Kind
303503 Gallup Aug 1884 A
337223 Williams Mar 1886 A
339550 Hudson Apr 1886 A
365091 Owen Jun 1887 A
444430 Gedge Jan 1891 A
452046 Mather May 1891 A
452649 Powell May 1891 A
478918 Cannon Jul 1892 A
543310 Laube Jul 1895 A
560509 Libbey May 1896 A
582486 Rowe May 1897 A
671778 Sams Apr 1901 A
705121 Newton Jul 1902 A
725014 Westover Apr 1903 A
886565 Williams et al. May 1908 A
1064066 Funk Jun 1913 A
1135424 Ashley et al. Apr 1915 A
1160203 Scherer Nov 1915 A
1160223 Wagenhorst Nov 1915 A
1450064 Dodds Mar 1923 A
1475161 Wagenhorst Nov 1923 A
1476780 Van Meter Dec 1923 A
1642207 Jones Sep 1927 A
1795574 Olson Mar 1931 A
1923476 Booth Aug 1933 A
1933178 Le Jeune Oct 1933 A
2937905 Altenburger May 1960 A
3008770 Mueller Nov 1961 A
4300804 Hasebe Nov 1981 A
4583787 Michelotti Apr 1986 A
4626036 Hinsbert et al. Dec 1986 A
4729605 Imao et al. Mar 1988 A
4844552 Tsygankov et al. Jul 1989 A
5061013 Hed et al. Oct 1991 A
5104199 Schlanger Apr 1992 A
5445439 Dietrich Aug 1995 A
5626401 Terry, Sr. et al. May 1997 A
5931544 Dietrich Aug 1999 A
6024414 Dietrich Feb 2000 A
6145938 Dietrich Nov 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (17)
Number Date Country
398372 Jan 1923 DE
583902 Aug 1933 DE
155602 Jun 1982 DE
425 730 Feb 1911 FR
874 167 Jul 1942 FR
1 019 285 Jan 1953 FR
2 378 642 Aug 1978 FR
2 786 435 Jun 2000 FR
2 792 250 Oct 2000 FR
16340 Dec 1866 GB
4449 Mar 1894 GB
22441 Nov 1898 GB
19499 Sep 1899 GB
9844 Apr 1911 GB
854546 Nov 1960 GB
2-77302 Mar 1990 JP
11 321 201 Nov 1999 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
“Bicycling”, Australia, May 2000 p. 8.
Bicycling, Apr. 1992, p. 152.
Bicycling, Apr. 1993, pp. 120 & 122.