Spoken translation system using meta information strings

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8032356
  • Patent Number
    8,032,356
  • Date Filed
    Friday, May 25, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 4, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
Spoken translation system which detects both speech from the information and also detects meta information streams from the information. A first aspect produces an enriched training corpus of information for use in the machine translation. A second aspect uses two different extraction techniques, and combines them by lattice rescoring.
Description
BACKGROUND

Speech translation systems are known in which a spoken utterance is converted to text using an automatic speech recognition or ASR system. This recognized speech is then translated using a machine translation “MT” system into the target language text. The target language text is subsequently re synthesized using a text to speech synthesizer.


SUMMARY

The present application defines determining additional information from speech beyond the conventional text information.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other aspects will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 illustrates a computer system that can be used



FIG. 2 illustrates flow steps of a first embodiment;



FIG. 3 illustrates flow steps of a second embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The operation can be carried out by a programmed computer that runs the flowcharts described herein. The computer can be as shown in FIG. 1 which illustrates an embodiment where a computer 100 runs a program that is stored on the storage media 105. The program produces output, e.g., on a display 110, or through an audio speaker 111, or by printing, or in some other way. The user can interact with the program and display via a user interface 120 which may include a keyboard and mouse, a microphone 121, and any other user interface part.



FIG. 2 illustrates a first embodiment which can be carried out as a routine that is executed by a processor that forms the computer. The FIG. 2 embodiment has an interface to a statistical machine translation system. Such systems are trained using training data, and the trained systems can translate information. In the embodiment, the system has been trained using enriched data that includes information indicative of non-text information. In the disclosed embodiment, the non-text information is the meta-information described herein. While this system may provide superior results, it requires a large amount of data to be produced.



FIG. 3 shows a second embodiment which uses an independent text-to-text statistical machine translation training part, and also a second layer of analysis that is used at run time. The second layer analysis is called a transform augmented information. The system also uses a synthesis to re-score the lattice output of the statistical machine translation.


Additional information extracted by the speech channel can be used to produce additional information from the translation process. The additional information can include keywords, prominence information, emotional information, and class descriptors, as well as other prosodic information which is often ignored in a speech to text conversion and in the ensuing text-to-text conversion.


In FIG. 2, speech in the source language 200 is processed by recognizing the speech at 205, and also by extracting “meta information”. The meta information in the embodiments may include the key words, as well as prominence, emotional and class descriptors as described above. For example, meta information can be found from words or oral characteristics that indicate superlatives or emphasis. Example words might include “unbelievably”, or “very, very”. Emphasis can also be signaled by oral emphasis on certain phrases. For example a keyword that indicate superlatives may have an accompanying indication of emphasis added as the meta information extracted by 210, e.g., an indication of bold or italics in written text, or an oral indication of emphasis in synthesized spoken text. The meta information extracts descriptors 220 that indicate the emphasis. These descriptors are associated with the text that is recognized from the speech.


Similarly, prominence information can indicate emphasis or the like by its words, or by emphasis in the sentence that indicates some kind of emphasized statement.


Emotional words may include words that indicate the user's state of mind, such as profanities, words like “upset”, and other keywords that can be used to train the system. The emotions may also be determined from the cadence of the speech that is being recognized. For example a filter may be trained to recognize emotional type talking such as whining, crying, or screaming.


These and other words that recognize descriptors of information in the text become descriptors 200. These accompany the text, and form a feature rich statistical machine translation result 230, which may be, for example, a training corpus.


The meta information is preferably extracted from real audio, and not from the transcripts. This allows the emotion, the emphasis, and other information to be obtained. This training and subsequent translation may be expensive way in terms of computer resources.



FIG. 3 illustrates a separate statistical machine training and information training. At run time, a lattice rescoring operation merges two separate information channels. The training in FIG. 3 takes the speech in the source language, and carries out speech recognition at 305 to produce text in the source language 315, as in the FIG. 2 embodiment. It also determines the meta information at 310 to determine the descriptors 320. The result is two separate operations: a statistical machine translation which is carried out at 325, and a transfer of the descriptors at 330.


This produces a lattice of translated information in the target language at 335, which are presented along with the descriptors at 340. 345 illustrates using a lattice rescoring operation to merge the two information channels.


The above describes training and translating, however it should be understood that this system can be applied to either or both of training and/or translating the using the meta information.


The general structure and techniques, and more specific embodiments which can be used to effect different ways of carrying out the more general goals are described herein.


Although only a few embodiments have been disclosed in detail above, other embodiments are possible and the inventor (s) intend these to be encompassed within this specification. The specification describes specific examples to accomplish a more general goal that may be accomplished in another way. This disclosure is intended to be exemplary, and the claims are intended to cover any modification or alternative which might be predictable to a person having ordinary skill in the art. For example, this can be used for speech recognition and/or speech translation, or training of such a system, or for any subset or superset thereof.


Also, the inventor(s) intend that only those claims which use the words “means for” are intended to be interpreted under 35 USC 112, sixth paragraph. Moreover, no limitations from the specification are intended to be read into any claims, unless those limitations are expressly included in the claims. The computers described herein may be any kind of computer, either general purpose, or some specific purpose computer such as a workstation. The computer may be a Pentium class computer, running Windows XP or Linux, or may be a Macintosh computer. The computer may also be a handheld computer, such as a PDA, cellphone, or laptop.


The programs may be written in C, or Java, Brew or any other programming language. The programs may be resident on a storage medium, e.g., magnetic or optical, e.g. the computer hard drive, a removable disk or media such as a memory stick or SD media, or other removable medium. The programs may also be run over a network, for example, with a server or other machine sending signals to the local machine, which allows the local machine to carry out the operations described herein.


Where a specific numerical value is mentioned herein, it should be considered that the value may be increased or decreased by 20%, while still staying within the teachings of the present application, unless some different range is specifically mentioned.

Claims
  • 1. A system, comprising: a speech receiving part, receiving a segment of speech signal in a source language to be processed;a computer part, operating to process the segment of speech signal comprising: processing in a first information channel the segment of speech signal in the source language using a statistical machine translation training, comprising: recognizing speech in the processed segment of speech signal in the source language,converting the recognized speech into text in the source language, andconverting the text in the source language into a lattice in a target language;processing in a second information channel the segment of speech signal in the source language using an information transfer training, the second information channel independent and separate from the first information channel, the processing in the second information channel comprising: extracting, from the segment of speech signal, meta information associated with the recognized speech, wherein the meta information includes at least one non-textual aspect of the recognized speech,obtaining descriptors in the source language from the meta information that includes at least one non-textual aspect, andtransforming the obtained descriptors in the source language into descriptors in the target language; andan output part producing an output in the target language comprising combining the lattice in the target language and the obtained descriptors in the second language using lattice rescoring.
  • 2. A system as in claim 1, wherein said computer part includes a training database, used to process said segment of speech.
  • 3. A system as in claim 2, wherein said training database comprises a first training part for said text to text statistical machine translation training, and a second training part that includes information about said non-textual aspect.
  • 4. A system as in claim 1, wherein said non-textual aspect includes keywords.
  • 5. A system as in claim 1, wherein said non-textual aspect includes prominence information.
  • 6. A system as in claim 1, wherein said non-textual aspect includes words which indicate emotions in the spoken speech.
  • 7. A system as in claim 1, wherein said output part is an audio producing element.
  • 8. A system as in claim 1, wherein said output part is a part that shows text.
  • 9. A computer-implemented method, comprising: processing in a first information channel, at a computer comprising a processor, a segment of speech signal in a source language using a statistical machine translation training, the processing in the first information channel comprising: recognizing speech in the processed segment of speech signal in the source language,converting the recognized speech into text in the source language, andconverting the text in the source language into a lattice in a target language;processing, at the computer, the segment of speech signal in the source language using an information transfer training in a second information channel independent and separate from the first information channel, the processing in the second information channel comprising: extracting, from the segment of speech signal, meta information associated with the recognized speech, wherein the meta information includes at least one non-textual aspect of the recognized speech,obtaining descriptors in the source language from the meta information that includes at least one non-textual aspect, andtransforming the obtained descriptors in the source language into descriptors in the target language; andgenerating an output in the target language comprising combining the lattice in the target language and the descriptors in the target language using a lattice rescoring system.
  • 10. A computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein the meta information is extracted from an input consisting of the segment of speech signal.
  • 11. A computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein the text in the source language is retained in the first information channel.
  • 12. A computer-implemented method as in claim 9, wherein said non-textual aspect includes keywords.
  • 13. A computer-implemented method as in claim 9, wherein said non-textual aspect includes prominence information.
  • 14. A computer-implemented method as in claim 9, wherein said non-textual aspect includes words which indicate emotions in the spoken speech.
  • 15. A computer-implemented method as in claim 9, wherein said processing is carried out directly on received audio indicative of the speech.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 60/803,220, filed May 25, 2006. The disclosure of the prior application is considered part of (and is incorporated by reference in) the disclosure of this application.

FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

The U.S. Government may have certain rights in this invention pursuant to Grant No. N66001-02-C-6023 awarded by DARPA/SPAWAR.

US Referenced Citations (57)
Number Name Date Kind
2177790 Scott Oct 1939 A
2674923 William Apr 1954 A
4067122 Fernandez et al. Jan 1978 A
4419080 Erwin Dec 1983 A
4604698 Ikemoto et al. Aug 1986 A
4658374 Tanimoto et al. Apr 1987 A
5161105 Kugimiya et al. Nov 1992 A
5201042 Weisner et al. Apr 1993 A
5576953 Hugentobler Nov 1996 A
5678001 Nagel et al. Oct 1997 A
5697789 Sameth et al. Dec 1997 A
5741136 Kirksey et al. Apr 1998 A
5760788 Chainini et al. Jun 1998 A
5799267 Siegel Aug 1998 A
5855000 Waibel et al. Dec 1998 A
5882202 Sameth et al. Mar 1999 A
5991594 Froeber et al. Nov 1999 A
5991711 Seno et al. Nov 1999 A
6073146 Chen Jun 2000 A
6243675 Ito Jun 2001 B1
6339754 Flanagan et al. Jan 2002 B1
6374224 Horiguchi et al. Apr 2002 B1
6394899 Walker May 2002 B1
6669562 Shiino Dec 2003 B1
6755657 Wasowicz Jun 2004 B1
6859778 Bakis et al. Feb 2005 B1
6866510 Polanyi et al. Mar 2005 B2
6970821 Shambaugh et al. Nov 2005 B1
7016829 Brill et al. Mar 2006 B2
7155382 Boys Dec 2006 B2
7238024 Rehbein et al. Jul 2007 B2
7409348 Wen et al. Aug 2008 B2
7461001 Liqin et al. Dec 2008 B2
7689407 Yang et al. Mar 2010 B2
7689422 Eves et al. Mar 2010 B2
20020059056 Appleby May 2002 A1
20020095281 Cox et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020184002 Galli Dec 2002 A1
20040083111 Rehbein et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040210923 Hudgeons et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040248068 Davidovich Dec 2004 A1
20050014563 Barri Jan 2005 A1
20050084829 Peters Apr 2005 A1
20050165645 Kirwin Jul 2005 A1
20050216256 Lueck Sep 2005 A1
20060212288 Sethy et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060293874 Zhang et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070015121 Johnson et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070208569 Subramanian et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070294077 Narayanan et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080003551 Narayanan et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080040095 Sinha et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080071518 Narayanan et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080255824 Aso Oct 2008 A1
20080268955 Spittle Oct 2008 A1
20090106016 Athsani et al. Apr 2009 A1
20100009321 Purushotma Jan 2010 A1
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080065368 A1 Mar 2008 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60803220 May 2006 US