1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to window coverings. More particularly, the present spools for horizontal blinds provide an apparatus for winding up multiple lift cords inside a head rail using only one pull cord, wherein the spools reduce the likelihood of the lift cords becoming tangled.
2. Description of the Related Art
Conventional horizontal blinds comprise a plurality of horizontal slats that are raised, lowered and/or rotated to adjust a level of light entering a room through a window or door. The slats are supported from a head rail by ladders. Generally, the blind assembly includes at least two ladders, and may include more ladders depending upon the length or weight of the slats.
Each ladder is typically constructed of a strong fibrous material such as nylon, and comprises a pair of vertically extending uprights supporting a plurality of evenly spaced rungs. An upper end of each upright is secured to a tilting mechanism within the head rail. Lower ends of each upright are secured to a bottom rail. Each rung supports a slat.
The tilting mechanism may comprise an elongate rod having a length substantially equal to a length of the head rail. The rod includes a plurality of attached drums, one drum corresponding to each ladder. Upper ends of the ladder uprights are secured to the drums. A wand or cord descending from the head rail controls rotation of the rod. The drums rotate with the rod, and the ladder uprights follow the rotation of the drums. As the drums rotate in a first direction, the ladder uprights on one side of the slats rise, and the ladder uprights on the opposite side of the slats fall, thus tilting the slats in a first tilt direction. As the drums rotate in a second direction opposite the first direction, the slats tilt in a second tilt direction.
Lifting cords descend from the head rail and are attached at their lower ends to the bottom rail. Generally, a position of each lifting cord along the length of the slats corresponds to a position of a ladder. The lifting cords may be threaded through loops on the ladder uprights, descending along front and back edges of each slat. Alternatively, the lifting cords may pass through apertures in the center of each slat.
The upper end of each lifting cord passes over a pulley within the head rail and attaches to a spool. Preferably, each lifting cord has a unique spool to prevent entanglement of the lifting cords. Generally, each spool includes a portion for winding up a pull cord. The pull cord is connected at its upper end to the spool. The pull cords pass along the head rail to an opening in a lower surface of the head rail. All pull cords pass through this opening and hang freely from the head rail. Free ends of each pull cord are usually secured to one another.
A downward force on the pull cords rotates the spools, unwinding the pull cords from the spools and winding up the lifting cords onto the spools. As the lifting cords wind up, they raise the bottom rail, which in turn raises each successive slat. When the pull cords are released, gravity pulls the bottom rail downward, winding up the pull cords onto the spools, unwinding the lifting cords from the spools, and lowering the bottom rail and slats. A brake positioned within the head rail engages the pull cords at a user's direction. The brake enables the user to selectively control a height of the bottom rail.
Multiple pull cords hanging from the head rail present a strangulation hazard to children. When the blinds are raised, the pull cords descend and often hang such that their lower ends are close to the floor. These dangling cords are attractive to children, and children frequently play with the cords. Unfortunately, these children also frequently become entangled in the cords. Sometimes the cords wrap around a child's neck, the child's airway becomes constricted, and the child dies.
Horizontal blinds having only one pull cord are much safer for children. Although the single dangling pull cord is still an attractive plaything to children, the single cord is much less likely to become wrapped around a child's neck and cause strangulation. Therefore, recent horizontal blind designs include only one pull cord. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,799,715 to Biro et al. discloses a Venetian blind assembly 10 including a number of conventional horizontal slats 12. A mechanism within a housing 14 extending across the top of the assembly raises and tilts the slats. Specifically, a pair of lifting cords 16 extend downward from the housing. Each lifting cord extends through a slot 18 in each slat, and through a hole 20 in a bottom rail 22, to a knot 24 at its distal end. The proximal end of each lifting cord extends around a lower surface of a spool 26, into a cord receiving hole 28 through part of a section 30 of the spool. In this way, the lifting cords 16 are simultaneously wound or unwound on the spool with rotation of the spool.
The spool rotates in response to motion of a pull cord 32, which extends from the lower surface of the spool opposite the direction in which the lifting cords extend. Thus, pulling the pull cord downward causes the pull cord to be unwound from the spool as the lifting cords are wound onto the spool. As the lifting cords wind onto the spool, the bottom rail rises. Similarly, releasing the pull cord causes the bottom rail to descend under the influence of gravity. As the bottom rail descends, the pull cord winds onto the spool and the lifting cords unwind from the spool. A conventional braking mechanism 34 releasably engages the pull cord, enabling the bottom rail to be suspended at any point in its vertical travel.
Means are also provided for guiding up to four lifting cords into and out of four sections of the spool. To prevent tangling of the lifting cords with one another, each section winds up only one lifting cord. Thus, the sections are separated from one another, and from a section 64, on which the pull cord is wound, by intervening flanges 66. A guiding structure 68 provides five channels 70 to direct the passage of the lifting cords through a flange 72 of a spool bracket 62. Each channel 70, being in a proximate relationship with an associated spool section, aligns a lifting cord with the section on which it is wound. Feeding each lifting cord centrally onto a spool section eliminates a tendency of the cord to build up windings along a flange.
The lifting cords of the Venetian blind assembly of Biro tend to bunch up on the lifting cord spool. The cords do not wind up in a predictable manner, but rather wind up in a random haphazard way. As a result, each cord tends to become tangled with itself. When the cords become tangled, they prevent the bottom rail from raising and lowering smoothly. To untangle the cords, a user must disassemble the head rail, which is a time consuming process.
The configuration of Biro also limits the capacity of each lifting cord spool section to accept lifting cords. As the width of each section increases, so does its capacity to accept lifting cords. However, the lifting cord spool sections of Biro are all mounted side-by-side and coaxially on a single spool. Thus, the maximum width of each section, and each section's lifting cord capacity is limited by the front-to-back width of the housing.
Therefore, new spools for horizontal blinds that reduce any tendency of the lifting cords to become tangled, and that increase the lifting cord capacity of the spools, would be of great benefit to users of horizontal blinds.
The preferred embodiments of the present spools for horizontal blinds have several features, no single one of which is solely responsible for their desirable attributes. Without limiting the scope of these spools for horizontal blinds as expressed by the claims that follow, their more prominent features will now be discussed briefly. After considering this discussion, and particularly after reading the section entitled “Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments,” one will understand how the features of the preferred embodiments provide advantages, which include reduced tendency for the lifting cords to become entangled and interfere with smooth operation of the blinds.
A preferred embodiment of the present spools for horizontal blinds comprises first and second spaced substantially disk-shaped walls, and a flared cylinder spanning the space between the walls. The cylinder includes a minimum circumference at substantially a center thereof, as measured along a longitudinal axis thereof. The cylinder further includes maximum circumferences at portions thereof that adjoin the walls.
Another preferred embodiment of the present spools for horizontal blinds comprises a substantially cylindrical bobbin including a plurality of substantially disk-shaped partitions. The partitions subdivide the bobbin into at least two sections. Each section is shaped as a flared cylinder, the cylinder having a minimum circumference at a midpoint between the partitions, and maximum circumferences at portions thereof adjoining the partitions.
Another preferred embodiment of the present spools for horizontal blinds comprises a first rotatably supported substantially cylindrical bobbin. The bobbin includes partitions subdividing the bobbin into a plurality of lifting cord spools. The spools further comprise a rotatably supported substantially cylindrical pull cord spool adjacent the first bobbin. Each lifting cord spool is shaped as a flared cylinder, the cylinder having a minimum circumference at a midpoint between the partitions, and maximum circumferences at portions thereof adjoining the partitions.
Another preferred embodiment of the present spools for horizontal blinds comprises a horizontal blind assembly. The assembly includes a head rail, and a horizontal bottom rail suspended from the head rail. A plurality of horizontal slats are suspended from the head rail intermediate the bottom rail and the head rail. At least one lifting cord descends from the head rail and is secured at a distal end to the bottom rail. A spool for winding the at least one lifting cord is located within the head rail. The spool comprises a flared cylindrical portion sandwiched between spaced disk-shaped walls. The cylindrical portion includes a minimum circumference at a midpoint between the walls, and maximum circumferences at portions thereof adjoining the walls.
The preferred embodiments of the spools for horizontal blinds, illustrating their features, will now be discussed in detail. These embodiments depict the novel and non-obvious spools for horizontal blinds shown in the accompanying drawings, which are for illustrative purposes only. These drawings include the following figures, in which like numerals indicate like parts:
As illustrated in
A pair of tilt cords 34 (
Lifting cords 40 descend from the head rail 24 and are attached at their lower ends to the bottom rail 28. Generally, a position of each lifting cord 40 along the length of the slats 22 corresponds to a position of a ladder 26. The lifting cords 40 may be threaded through loops (not shown) on the ladder uprights 38, descending along front and/or back edges of each slat 22. Alternatively, the lifting cords 40 may pass through apertures 42 in the center of each slat 22, as shown in
The lifting cords 40 may be any type of cord typically used in the window covering industry. One preferred type of cord is 0.9 mm Spectra-Fiber™. Those of skill in the art will appreciate, however, that any type of cord could be used, including other sizes of Spectra-Fiber™. Those of skill in the art will further appreciate that ribbons could also be used in place of cords.
The upper end of each lifting cord 40 passes over a pulley 44 (
The upper end of a pull cord 50 (
The pull cord 50 may be any type of cord typically used in the window covering industry. One preferred type of cord is 1.8 mm Spectra-Fiber™. Those of skill in the art will appreciate, however, that any type of cord could be used, including other sizes of Spectra-Fiber™. Those of skill in the art will further appreciate that ribbons could also be used in place of cords.
As shown in
Those of skill in the art will appreciate that alternate configurations can be used to induce rotation of the lifting cord bobbins 48. For example, as illustrated in
Preferably, the pull cord gear 60 is larger than the lifting cord gears 62. The lifting cord spools 46 thus rotate more quickly than the pull cord spool 52. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the gears 60, 62 need not be located at ends of the bobbins 48 and the pull cord spool 52. For example, the gears 60, 62 could be located at intermediate portions of the bobbins 48 and spool 52. Those of skill in the art will further appreciate that the pull cord cylinder 54 need not be located between the two lifting cord spool bobbins 48. For example, the two lifting cord spool bobbins 48 could be located to the same side of the pull cord cylinder 54.
The pull cord spool 52 comprises a second wider portion of the pull cord cylinder 54 bounded on either side by disk-shaped side walls 64 (
The pull cord spool 52 includes a through-hole 66 defining an axis that is perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the pull cord cylinder 54. In the illustrated embodiment, each end of the through-hole 66 is surrounded by a counter bore 68 of larger diameter than the through-hole 66. The through-hole 66 anchors the pull cord 50. When the blind assembly 20 is assembled, an assembly person threads the pull cord 50 through the hole 66 and ties a knot in the end of the pull cord 50. The knot (not shown) is sized such that it cannot pass through the hole 66, but is small enough to nest within the counter bore 68. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the pull cord 50 could be anchored to the spool 52 using other methods besides the through-hole 66 and counter bore 68. For example, the end of the pull cord 50 could simply be glued to the spool 52.
As shown in
When the user releases the pull cord 50, gravity pulls the bottom rail 28 downward, winding up the pull cord 50 onto the pull cord spool 52, unwinding the lifting cords 40 from the lifting cord spools 46, and lowering the bottom rail 28 and slats 22. A brake 74 positioned within the head rail 24 engages the pull cord 50 at a user's direction.
When the brake 74 engages the pull cord 50, it prevents the pull cord 50 from winding onto the pull cord spool 52. Through interaction of the gears 60, 62, the brake 74 thus prevents the lifting cord spools 46 from turning under the influence of gravity acting on the bottom rail 28. The brake 74 thus enables the user to selectively control a height of the bottom rail 28.
The lifting cord spools 46, shown in detail in
Each lifting cord spool 46, defined as the space between two neighboring partitions 76 on the lifting cord bobbin 48, comprises a flared cylindrical hub. When viewed in profile, as in
Each lifting cord spool 46 preferably includes a through-hole 82 defining an axis that is perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the lifting cord bobbin 48. In the illustrated embodiment, each end of each through-hole 82 is surrounded by a counter bore 84 of larger diameter than the through-hole 82. The through-hole 82 anchors a lifting cord 40. When the blind assembly 20 is assembled, an assembly person threads a lifting cord 40 through the hole 82 and ties a knot in the end of the lifting cord 40. The knot (not shown) is sized such that it cannot pass through the hole 82, but is small enough to nest within the counter bore 84. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the lifting cord 40 could be anchored to the spool 46 using other methods besides the through-hole 82 and counter bore 84. For example, the end of the lifting cord 40 could simply be glued to the spool 46.
The pull cord cylinder 54 and lifting cord bobbins 48 nest within a cradle 86, which is shown in detail in
Opposing first side walls 94 of the cradle 86 include three spaced holes 96. Each hole 96 corresponds to a hole 96 on the opposite wall 94, and each pair of holes 96 is aligned with one of the indentations 90 in the partition wall 88. An axle (not shown) extends between each pair of holes 96. The center axle passes through a central channel 98 (
Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the cradle 86 need not include the partition wall 88. Each axle could be supported only at its ends by a pair of the spaced holes 96. Those of skill in the art will further appreciate that the pull cord cylinder 54 need not include the central channel 98, and the lifting cord bobbins 48 need not include the central channel 78. In such a configuration, the pull cord cylinder 54 and the lifting cord bobbins 48 would each preferably include a cylindrical peg (not shown) extending from either end thereof. The pegs would engage the pairs of space holes 96 to rotatably support the pull cord cylinder 54 and the lifting cord bobbins 48 within the cradle. The pegs could be formed as parts of a unitary whole with each of the pull cord cylinder 54 and the lifting cord bobbins 48, or they could be attached thereto.
Opposing second side walls 100 of the cradle 86 include indentations 102 in upper edges thereof. The indentations 102 provide clearance for the tilt rod 30, which passes through the cradle 86 in a direction perpendicular to the axles.
To raise the blinds in a blind assembly 20 including the present spools 46, 52, a user grasps the free-hanging portion of the pull cord 50 and applies a downward pulling force. The force disengages the brake 74 from the pull cord 50 and rotates the pull cord spool 52, unwinding the pull cord 50 from the pull cord spool 52. Rotation of the pull cord spool 52 induces rotation of the lifting cord bobbins 48 through interengagement of the pull cord gear 60 with the lifting cord gears 62. As the pull cord 50 unwinds from the pull cord spool 52, the lifting cords 40 wind onto the lifting cord spools 46.
The flared shape of each lifting cord spool 46 controls the winding pattern of each lifting cord 40. As the lifting cord 40 winds onto the spool 46, the flared, larger circumference portions urge the cord 40 toward the center of the spool 46. Thus, each lifting cord 40 winds first onto the narrow center portion of the spool 46. As the cord 40 winds further onto the spool 46, it gradually occupies a wider and wider span of the spool 46. The cord 40 forms well ordered layers on the spool 46, rather than bunching up in places and winding onto the spool 46 in a generally chaotic fashion. The well-ordered layers enable the cord 40 to unwind from the spool 46 in a smooth and orderly fashion, thus reducing the likelihood of the cord 40 becoming tangled with itself and preventing the blinds from lowering properly.
To lower the blinds in a blind assembly 20 including the present spools 46, 52, a user grasps the free-hanging portion of the pull cord 50 and first applies a downward pulling force. The force disengages the brake 74 from the pull cord 50. The user then lets gravity pull the bottom rail 28 downward while the pull cord 50 slides through the user's fingers. The descending bottom rail 28 unwinds the lifting cords 40 from the lifting cord spools 46. Interengagement of the gears 60, 62 causes the pull cord spool 52 to rotate and wind up the pull cord 50.
With the present spools, the lifting cords 40 unwind smoothly from the lifting cord spools 46 because they wind onto the spools 46 in the orderly fashion described above. With prior art spools, the lifting cords wind onto the spools in a random, jumbled fashion. Thus, the cords tend to bunch up, and bunches tend to trap later cord coils. Thus, as the user tries to lower the blinds, the lifting cord becomes trapped and tangled with itself, preventing the lifting cord from unwinding from the lifting cord spool, and preventing the bottom rail from descending.
Those of skill in the art will appreciate that each bobbin 48 could be partitioned into more or fewer spools 46, depending upon the requirements of any given application. For example, an alternative bobbin arrangement is illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment, each spool 46 is located adjacent a rear wall 114 of the head rail 24. Similarly, the pull cord spool 52 is located adjacent the rear wall 114. This configuration advantageously provides ample space in a front portion of the head rail 24 to house a tilt rod (not shown), such as the rod 30 shown in
In the configuration illustrated in
As shown in
As shown in
The plates 126, 128 may include one or more apertures 136 that are concentric with the bosses 130. The apertures 136 may accept fasteners such as a bolt 138, illustrated in
Ends of the plates 126, 128 include apertures 134 through which the cords pass. The plates 126, 128 may be secured within the head rail 24 such that the axes of each spool 46, 52 are horizontal, similar to the configuration of
In the embodiment illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment, the lifting cord spools 104 are shaped as linearly tapered cylinders. As the lifting cords 40 wind onto the lifting cord spools 104, they tend to wind first onto the narrow end of each spool 104. The lifting cords 40 gradually travel toward the wide end of each spool 104 as they wind further and further onto the lifting cord spools 104. Because each lifting cord 40 winds onto the spools 104 in such a predictable fashion, any tendency of each lifting cord 40 to become entangled with itself is virtually eliminated. The lifting cords 40 unwind smoothly from the spools 104, enabling the bottom rail 28 to descend smoothly as the blinds are lowered.
The above presents a description of the best mode contemplated for carrying out the present spools for horizontal blinds, and of the manner and process of making and using them, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which they pertain to make and use these spools. These spools are, however, susceptible to modifications and alternate constructions from that discussed above that are fully equivalent. Consequently, these spools are not limited to the particular embodiments disclosed. On the contrary, these spools cover all modifications and alternate constructions coming within the spirit and scope of the spools as generally expressed by the following claims, which particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter of the spools.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1819337 | Pevear | Aug 1931 | A |
2349118 | Simpson | May 1944 | A |
2598887 | Burns | Jun 1952 | A |
3176932 | Kovaleski | Apr 1965 | A |
3296583 | Chatten et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3756585 | Mihalcheon | Sep 1973 | A |
3857529 | Pitts et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3958769 | Miyamae | May 1976 | A |
4088170 | Franklin | May 1978 | A |
4176807 | Kwon | Dec 1979 | A |
5054162 | Rogers | Oct 1991 | A |
5133399 | Hiller et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5374007 | Murison | Dec 1994 | A |
5482100 | Kuhar | Jan 1996 | A |
5531257 | Kuhar | Jul 1996 | A |
5799715 | Biro et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5996667 | Fun | Dec 1999 | A |
6102195 | Weikel | Aug 2000 | A |
6155328 | Welfonder | Dec 2000 | A |
6244532 | Watanabe | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6283192 | Toti | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289965 | Ruggles | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6318661 | Martin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325131 | Dekker et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330899 | Ciuca et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6561253 | Hsiao | May 2003 | B1 |
6588480 | Anderson | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6622769 | Judkins | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6808002 | Colson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
40 01 250 | Jul 1991 | DE |
1 013 871 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1 045 109 | Oct 2000 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040108079 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |