Lightweight foam materials are commonly used in sporting good implements, such as hockey sticks and baseball bats, because their strength-to-weight ratios provide a solid combination of light weight and performance. Lightweight foams are often used, for example, as interior regions of sandwich structures to provide lightweight cores of sporting good implements.
Foamed materials, however, have limitations. For example, foamed materials have homogeneous, isotropic properties, such that they generally have the same characteristics in all directions. Further, not all foamed materials can be precisely controlled, and their properties are stochastic, or random, and not designed in any particular direction. And because of their porosity, foamed materials often compress or lose strength over time.
Some commonly used foams, such as polymer foams, are cellular materials that can be manufactured with a wide range of average-unit-cell sizes and structures. Typical foaming processes, however, result in a stochastic structure that is somewhat limited in mechanical performance and in the ability to handle multifunctional applications.
A sporting good implement, such as a hockey stick or ball bat, includes a main body. The main body may be formed from multiple layers of a structural material, such as a fiber-reinforced composite material. One or more microlattice structures may be positioned between layers of the structural material. One or more microlattice structures may additionally or alternatively be used to form the core of a sporting good implement, such as a hockey-stick blade. The microlattice structures improve the performance, strength, or feel of the sporting good implement. Other features and advantages will appear hereinafter.
In the drawings, wherein the same reference number indicates the same element throughout the views:
Various embodiments of the invention will now be described. The following description provides specific details for a thorough understanding and enabling description of these embodiments. One skilled in the art will understand, however, that the invention may be practiced without many of these details. Additionally, some well-known structures or functions may not be shown or described in detail so as to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the relevant description of the various embodiments.
The terminology used in the description presented below is intended to be interpreted in its broadest reasonable manner, even though it is being used in conjunction with a detailed description of certain specific embodiments of the invention. Certain terms may even be emphasized below; however, any terminology intended to be interpreted in any restricted manner will be overtly and specifically defined as such in this detailed description section.
Where the context permits, singular or plural terms may also include the plural or singular term, respectively. Moreover, unless the word “or” is expressly limited to mean only a single item exclusive from the other items in a list of two or more items, then the use of “or” in such a list is to be interpreted as including (a) any single item in the list, (b) all of the items in the list, or (c) any combination of items in the list. Further, unless otherwise specified, terms such as “attached” or “connected” are intended to include integral connections, as well as connections between physically separate components.
Micro-scale lattice structures, or “microlattice” structures, include features ranging from tens to hundreds of microns. These structures are typically formed from a three dimensional, interconnected array of self-propagating photopolymer waveguides. A microlattice structure may be formed, for example, by directing collimated ultraviolet light beams through apertures to polymerize a photomonomer material. Intricate three-dimensional lattice structures may be created using this technique.
In one embodiment, microlattice structures may be formed by exposing a two-dimensional mask, which includes a pattern of circular apertures and covers a reservoir containing an appropriate photomonomer, to collimated ultraviolet light. Within the photomonomer, self-propagating photopolymer waveguides originate at each aperture in the direction of the ultraviolet collimated beam and polymerize together at points of intersection. By simultaneously forming an interconnected array of these fibers in three-dimensions and removing the uncured monomer, unique three-dimensional, lattice-based, open-cellular polymer materials can be rapidly fabricated.
The photopolymer waveguide process provides the ability to control the architectural features of the bulk cellular material by controlling the fiber angle, diameter, and three-dimensional spatial location during fabrication. The general unit-cell architecture may be controlled by the pattern of circular apertures on the mask or the orientation and angle of the collimated, incident ultraviolet light beams.
The angle of the lattice members with respect to the exposure-plane angle are controlled by the angle of the incident light beam. Small changes in this angle can have a significant effect on the resultant mechanical properties of the material. For example, the compressive modulus of a microlattice material may be altered greatly with small angular changes within the microlattice structure.
Microlattice structures can provide improved mechanical performance (higher stiffness and strength per unit mass, for example), as well as an accessible open volume for unique multifunctional capabilities. The photopolymer waveguide process may be used to control the architectural features of the bulk cellular material by controlling the fiber angle, diameter, and three-dimensional spatial location during fabrication. Thus, the microlattice structure may be designed to provide strength and stiffness in desired directions to optimize performance with minimal weight.
This manufacturing technique is able to produce three-dimensional, open-cellular polymer materials in seconds. In addition, the process provides control of specific microlattice parameters that ultimately affect the bulk material properties. Unlike stereolithography, which builds up three-dimensional structures layer by layer, this fabrication technique is rapid (minutes to form an entire part) and can use a single two-dimensional exposure surface to form three-dimensional structures (with a thickness greater than 25 mm possible). This combination of speed and planar scalability opens up the possibility for large-scale, mass manufacturing. The utility of these materials range from lightweight energy-absorbing structures, to thermal-management materials, to bio-scaffolds.
A microlattice structure may be constructed by this method using any polymer that can be cured with ultraviolet light. Alternatively, the microlattice structure may be made of a metal material. For example, the microlattice may be dipped in a catalyst solution before being transferred to a nickel-phosphorus solution. The nickel-phosphorus alloy may then be deposited catalytically on the surface of the polymer struts to a thickness of around 100 nm. Once coated, the polymer is etched away with sodium hydroxide, leaving a lattice geometry of hollow nickel-phosphorus tubes.
The resulting microlattice structure may be greater than 99.99 percent air, and around 10 percent less dense than the lightest known aerogels, with a density of approximately 0.9 mg/cm3. Thus, these microlattice structures may have a density less than 1.0 mg/cm3. A typical lightweight foam, such as Airex C71, by comparison, has a density of approximately 60 mg/cm3 and is approximately 66 times heavier.
Further, the microengineered lattice structure has remarkably different properties than a bulk alloy. A bulk alloy, for example, is typically very brittle. When the microlattice structure is compressed, conversely, the hollow tubes do not snap but rather buckle like a drinking straw with a high degree of elasticity. The microlattice can be compressed to half its volume, for example, and still spring back to its original shape. And the open-cell structure of the microlattice allows for fluid flow within the microlattice, such that a foam or elastomeric material, for example, may fill the air space to provide additional vibration damping or strengthening of the microlattice material.
The manufacturing method described above could be modified to optimize the size and density of the microlattice structure locally to add strength or stiffness in desired regions. This can be done by varying:
The manufacturing method could also be modified to include fiber reinforcement. For example, fibers may be arranged to be co-linear or co-planar with the collimated ultraviolet light beams. The fibers are submersed in the photomonomer resin and wetted out. When the ultraviolet light polymerizes the photomonomer resin, the resin cures and adheres to the fiber. The resulting microlattice structure will be extremely strong, stiff, and light.
This process is repeated for the other sets of vertical planes 12 and 14 resulting in the structure shown in
Alternatively, a hexagonal shaped cell can be constructed as shown in
This process is repeated for the remaining two sets of vertically opposed planes to create the cell structure shown in
Cell structures 10 and 80 shown in
Other design alternatives exist to vary the compression resistance of the microlattice structure. For example, the size of the lattice beams may vary by changing the aperture size in the mask. Thus, there are multiple ways to vary and optimize the local stiffness of the microlattice structure.
The microlattice structures described above may be used in a variety of sporting-good applications. For example, one or more microlattice structures may be used as the core of a hockey-stick blade. The stiffness and strength of the microlattice may be designed to optimize the performance of the hockey-stick blade. For example, the density of the microlattice may be higher in the heel area of the blade where pucks are frequently impacted when shooting slap-shots or trapping pucks—than in the toe region or mid-region of the blade. Further, the microlattice may be more open or flexible toward the toe of the blade to enable a faster wrist shot or to enhance feel and control of the blade.
One or more microlattice structures may also be used to enhance the laminate strength in a hockey-stick shaft, bat barrel, or bat handle. Positioning the microlattice as an interlaminar ply within a bat barrel, for example, could produce several benefits. The microlattice can separate the inner barrel layers from the outer barrel layers, yet allow the outer barrel to deflect until the microlattice reaches full compression, then return to a neutral position. The microlattice may be denser in the sweet-spot area where the bat produces the most power, and more open in lower-power regions to help enhance bat power away from the sweet spot.
For a hockey-stick shaft or bat handle, the microlattice may be an interlaminar material that acts like a sandwich structure, effectively increasing the wall thickness of the laminate, which increases the stiffness and strength of the shaft or handle.
One or more microlattice structures may also be used in or as a connection material between a handle and a barrel of a ball bat. Connecting joints of this nature have traditionally been made from elastomeric materials, as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,593,158, which is incorporated herein by reference. Such materials facilitate relative movement between the bat barrel and handle, thereby absorbing the shock of impact and increasing vibration damping.
A microlattice structure used in or as a connection joint provides an elastic and resilient intermediary that can absorb compression loads and return to shape after impact. In addition, the microlattice can be designed with different densities to make specific zones of the connection joint stiffer than others to provide desired performance benefits. The microlattice structure also offers the ability to tune the degree of isolation of the barrel from the handle to increase the amount of control and damping without significantly increasing the weight of the bat.
Microlattice structures may also be used in helmet liners to provide shock absorption, in bike seats as padding, or in any number of other sporting-good applications.
Any of the above-described embodiments may be used alone or in combination with one another. Further, the described items may include additional features not described herein. While several embodiments have been shown and described, various changes and substitutions may of course be made, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The invention, therefore, should not be limited, except by the following claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/922,526, filed Mar. 15, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/276,739, filed May 13, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,925,440. The contents of the aforementioned applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4124208 | Burns | Nov 1978 | A |
5217221 | Baum | Jun 1993 | A |
5593158 | Filice et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5661854 | March, II | Sep 1997 | A |
5865696 | Calapp et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6015156 | Pratt | Jan 2000 | A |
6033328 | Bellefleur et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6805642 | Meyer | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6918847 | Gans | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7008338 | Pearson | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7382959 | Jacobsen | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7424967 | Ervin et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7510206 | Walker | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7627938 | Kim et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7824591 | Gans | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7963868 | McGrath et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8921702 | Carter et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
9086229 | Roper et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9116428 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9119433 | Leon | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9486679 | Goldstein et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9566758 | Cheung | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9839251 | Pannikottu et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9841075 | Russo | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9892214 | Morrow et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9925440 | Davis et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10525315 | Wells | Jan 2020 | B1 |
10875239 | McCluskey | Dec 2020 | B2 |
20050245090 | Mori et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070270253 | Davis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070277296 | Bullock | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090264230 | Thouin | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100156058 | Koyess | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160095 | Chauvin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110111954 | Li et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120297526 | Leon | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130025031 | Laperriere et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130025032 | Durocher et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130143060 | Jacobsen et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130196175 | Levit et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140013492 | Bottlang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140272275 | Yang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140311315 | Isaac | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150298443 | Hundley et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150307044 | Hundley | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150328512 | Davis et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160192741 | Mark | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160327113 | Shelley | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170273386 | Kuo et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170303622 | Stone et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180027914 | Cook | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180027916 | Smallwood | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180132556 | Laperriere et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180200591 | Davis et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180231347 | Tyler et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180345575 | Constantinou et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190290981 | Davis et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190290982 | Davis et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190290983 | Davis et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200022444 | Stone et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20220079280 | Laperriere et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220142284 | Laperriere et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2294301 | Jan 2000 | CA |
2949062 | Nov 2015 | CA |
3054525 | Nov 2015 | CA |
3054547 | Nov 2015 | CA |
2949062 | Feb 2020 | CA |
3054525 | Feb 2022 | CA |
3054536 | Mar 2022 | CA |
105218939 | Jan 2016 | CN |
3142753 | Aug 2019 | EP |
2013025800 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2014100462 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO-2014100462 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2015175541 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2016209872 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2017062945 | Apr 2017 | WO |
2017136890 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017136941 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2018072017 | Apr 2018 | WO |
2018072034 | Apr 2018 | WO |
2018157148 | Aug 2018 | WO |
2020028232 | Feb 2020 | WO |
2020232550 | Nov 2020 | WO |
2020232552 | Nov 2020 | WO |
2020232555 | Nov 2020 | WO |
2021062519 | Apr 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Jacobsen et al., Interconnected self-propagating photopolymer waveguides: An alternative to stereolitography for rapid formation of lattice-based open-cellelar materials:, Twenty-First AnnualInternational Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX Aug. 9, 2010, 846-853. |
Jul. 31, 2015—(PCT)—International Search Report and Written Opinion—App PCT/US15/30383. |
Jan. 22, 2018—(EP)—European Search Report—App. No. 15793488.6. |
Sep. 20, 2017—(CA) Examiner's Report—App. No. 2,949,062—MM. |
Advisory Action dated Jun. 14, 2016 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/276,739, 3 pages. |
Advisory Action dated Mar. 21, 2017 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/276,739, 3 pages. |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary dated Aug. 15, 2017 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/276,739, 3 pages. |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary dated Jun. 13, 2016 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/276,739, 2 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 14, 2018 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/276,739, 2 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 16, 2017 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/276,739, 3 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 9, 2017 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/276,739, 7 pages. |
Office Action dated Aug. 24, 2015 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/276,739, 5 pages. |
Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2016 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/276,739, 5 pages. |
Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2016 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/276,739, 5 pages. |
Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2016 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/276,739, 6 pages. |
Office Action dated May 1, 2017 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/276,739, 7 pages. |
Restriction Requirement dated Jun. 9, 2015 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/276,739, 5 pages. |
Advisory Action dated Mar. 17, 2021 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/922,526, 3 pages. |
Examiner Report dated Nov. 25, 2020 in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 3054547, 5 pages. |
Examiner Report dated Nov. 25, 2020 in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 3054536, 5 pages. |
Examiner Report dated Nov. 24, 2020, in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 3,054,525, 5 pages. |
Examiner Report dated Nov. 25, 2020 in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 3054530, 7 pages. |
Examiner's Report dated Jul. 29, 2019 in connection with Canadian Patent Application 2,949,062, 3 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2020 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/922,526, 17 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2021 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/440,655, 39 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2021 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/440,691, 41 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 19, 2020 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2020/050689, 11 pages. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 20, 2020 in connection with International PCT application No. PCT/CA2020/050683, 5 pages. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 21, 2020 in connection with International PCT application No. PCT/CA2020/050686, 4 pages. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 25, 2020 in connection with International PCT application No. PCT/CA2020/050684, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2019 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/922,526, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2020 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/922,526, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2020 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/440,691, 33 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2020 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/440,655, 41 pages. |
Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 20, 2020 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/440,691, 6 pages. |
Restriction Requirement dated Mar. 5, 2019 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/922,526, 6 pages. |
Written Opinion dated Aug. 20, 2020 in connection with International PCT application No. PCT/CA2020/050683, 8 pages. |
Written Opinion dated Aug. 21, 2020 in connection with International PCT application No. PCT/CA2020/050686, 5 pages. |
Written Opinion dated Aug. 25, 2020 in connection with International PCT application No. PCT/CA2020/050684, 7 pages. |
Wang, X. et al., 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective, Composites Part B, 2017, vol. 110, pp. 442-458. |
Wirth, D. M. et al. Highly expandable foam for litographic 3D printing, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12 pp. 19033-19043. |
Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 17, 2020 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/440,655, 9 pages. |
Examiner Report dated Apr. 27, 2021 in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 3,054,525, 3 pages. |
Examiner Report dated Apr. 27, 2021 in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 3,054,530, 4 pages. |
Examiner Report dated Apr. 27, 2021 in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 3,054,536, 5 pages. |
Examiner Report dated Apr. 27, 2021 in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 3,054,547, 5 pages. |
Examiner Report dated Aug. 2, 2021 in connection with Canadian Patent Application No. 3,054,530, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 1, 2021 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2020/050689, 31 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 14, 2021 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2020/050683, 17 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 3, 2021 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2020/050686, 54 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2021 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/440,655, 35 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2021 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/440,691, 33 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action issued Sep. 7, 2021 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/922,526, 22 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2022 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 15/922,526, 24 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2022 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/440,655, 39 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2022 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/440,717, 20 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 8, 2022 in connection with International Patent Application PCT/CA2020/050684, 11 pages. |
Written Opinion dated Dec. 14, 2021 in connection with International PCT application No. PCT/CA2020/050684, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2022 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 17/611,262, 36 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2022 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/440,691, 31 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2022 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/440,691, 32 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2022 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 16/440,655, 39 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190290983 A1 | Sep 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15922526 | Mar 2018 | US |
Child | 16440717 | US | |
Parent | 14276739 | May 2014 | US |
Child | 15922526 | US |