Patent Application
20050192319
This invention relates to spot-on formulations for combating parasites in birds and mammals. In particular, this invention provides for spot-on formulations comprising a composition comprising a 1-N-phenylpyrazole derivative and/or a macrolide anthelmintic or antiparasitic agent, and a pharmaceutically or veterinary acceptable liquid carrier vehicle. This invention also provides for to an improved method for eradicating, controlling, and preventing parasite infestation in birds and mammals.
Animals such as mammals and birds are often susceptible to parasite infestations. These parasites may be ectoparasites, such as insects, and endoparasites such as filariae and worms.
Domesticated animal, such as cats and dogs, are often infested with one or more of the following ectoparasites:
Fleas are a particular problem because not only do they adversely affect the health of the animal or human, but they also cause a great deal of psychological stress. Moreover, fleas are also vectors of pathogenic agents in animals, such as dog tapeworm (Dipylidium caninum), and humans.
Similarly, ticks are also harmful to the physical and psychological health of the animal or human. However, the most serious problem associated with ticks is that they are the vector of pathogenic agents, agents which cause diseases in both humans and animal. Major diseases which are caused by ticks include borrelioses (Lyme disease caused by Borrelia burgdorferi), babesioses (or piroplasmoses caused by Babesia sp.) and rickettsioses (also known as Rocky Mountain spotted fever). Ticks also release toxins which cause inflammation or paralysis in the host. Occasionally, these toxins are fatal to the host.
Moreover, mites and lice are particularly difficult to combat since there are very few active substances which act on these parasites and they require frequent treatment.
Likewise, farm animals are also susceptible to parasite infestations. For example, cattle are affected by a large number of parasites. A parasite which is very prevalent among farm animals is a tick genus Boophilus, especially those of the species microplus (cattle tick), decoloratus and anulatus. Ticks, such as Boophilus microplus, are particularly difficult to control because they live in the pasture where the farm animals graze. Other important parasites of cattle and sheep are listed as follows in order of decreasing importance:
Animals and humans also suffer from endoparasitical infections including, for example, helminthiasis which is most frequently caused by a group of parasitic worms described as nematodes or heartworms or roundworms. These parasites cause severe economic losses in pigs, sheep, horses, and cattle as well as affecting domestic animals and poultry. Other parasites which occur in the gastrointestinal tract of animals and humans include Ancylostoma, Necator, Ascaris, Strongyloides, Trichinella, Capillaria, Toxocara, Toxascaris, Trichuris, Enterobius and parasites which are found in the blood or other tissues and organs such as filarial worms and the extra intestinal stages of Strogyloides, Toxocara and Trichinella.
Many insecticides exist in the art for treating parasites. These insecticides vary in their effectiveness to a particular parasite as well as their cost. However the results of these insecticides is not always satisfactory because of, for example, the development of resistance by the parasite to the therapeutic agent, as is the case, for example, with carbamates, organophosphorus compounds and pyrethroids. Moreover, there is at the present time no truly effective method for controlling both ticks and helminths and less still an effective way of controlling the set of parasites indicated above. Thus, there is a need in the art for more effective antiparasitic formulation treatment and protection of animal, e.g. mammals, fish and birds for a wide range of parasites. Moreover, there is a need in the art for antiparasitic formulation which is easy to use on any type of domestic animal, irrespective of its size and the nature of its coat and which do not need to be sprinkled over the entire body of the mammal, fish or bird.
A new family of insecticides based on 1-N-phenylpyrazoles is described in Patents EP-A-295,217 and EP-A-352,944. The compounds of the families defined in these patents are extremely active and one of these compounds, 1-[2,6-Cl2-4-CF3 phenyl]-3-CN-4-[SO—CF3]-5-NH2 pyrazole, or fipronil, is particularly effective, not only against crop parasites but also against ectoparasites of mammals and birds. Fipronil is particularly, but not exclusively, effective against fleas and ticks.
Endectocidal compounds, which exhibit a degree of activity against a wide range endoparasites, are known in the art. These compounds possess a macrocyclic lactone ring and are known in the art to be particularly effective against ectoparasites, including lice, blowflies, flies, mosquitoes, mites, migrating dipterous larvae, and ticks, as well as endoparasites, such as nematodes, heartworms and roundworms. Compounds of this group include avermectins, milbemycins, and derivatives of these compounds, for example, abamectin, doramectin, emamectin, eprinomectin, ivermectin, latidectin, lepimectin, milbemectin, moxidectin or selamectin. Such substances are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,950,360; 4,199,569; 4,879,749; and 5,268,710.
While it is known in the art that it is sometimes possible to combine various parasiticides in order to broaden the antiparasitical spectrum, it is not possible to predict, a priori, which combinations will work for a particular animal or disease state. For this reason, the results of various combinations is not always successful and there is a need in the art for more effective formulations which may be easily administered to the animal. The effectiveness of formulations comprising 1-N-phenylpyrazole derivatives and macrolide lactone anthelmintic or parasitic agents, such as avermectins, ivermectins and milbemycin, against an endoparasite or an ectoparasite in a specific host is especially difficult to predict because of the numerous and complex host-parasite interactions.
Patent application AU-A-16 427/95 very broadly mentions the combination of a substituted 1-N-pyrazole derivatives with an avermectin, ivermectin or moxidectin in a discussion involving among a very large number of insecticides or parasiticides of various types, including fipronil. However, this patent application does not provide specific guidance to the skilled artisan on how to formulate a 1-N-pyrazole derivative with an avermectin or milbemycin type compound, let alone how to formulate a spot-on composition comprising these compounds. Moreover, the application does not indicate which specific parasites are susceptible to what specific combination.
Various methods of formulating antiparasitical formulations are known in the art. These include oral formulations, baits, dietary supplements, powders, shampoos, etc. Formulations for localized topical applications of antiparasitical formulations are also known in the art. For example, pour-on solutions comprising 1-N-phenylpyrazoles, such as fipronil, are known in the art and are described in copending application Ser. No. 08/933,016, herein incorporated by reference. Other methods of formulating antiparasitic agents include spot-on formulations.
Spot-on formulations are well known techniques for topically delivering an antiparasitic agent to a limited area of the host. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,045,536 describes such formulations for ectoparasites. Moreover, it is generally known in the art to formulate avermectin and milbemycin derivatives as spot-on formulations. See, e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 5,045,536; EP 677,054; U.S. Pat. No. 5,733,877; U.S. Pat. No. 5,677,332; U.S. Pat. No. 5,556,868; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,723,488. However, as discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,045,536, a large number of solvent systems described in the art provide formulations for localized topical application which cause irritancy or toxicity to the host. Hence, there is a need in the art both for more effect and less irritant or toxic formulations. Thus, there is a need in the art for a spot-on formulation which is effect against a wide range of endoparasites and ectoparasites in birds and mammals.
The invention provides for spot-on formulations for the treatment or prophylaxis of parasites of mammals, fish and birds, and in particular, cats, dogs, horses, chickens, sheep and cattle with the aim of ridding these hosts of all the parasites commonly encountered by birds and mammals. The invention also provides for effective and lasting destruction of ectoparasites, such as fleas, ticks, mites, e.g. itch mites, mosquitoes, flies and lice, and of endoparasites, nematodes, such as filariae, heartworms and roundworms of the digestive tract of animals and humans.
In particular this invention provides for spot-on formulations for the treatment or prophylaxis of parasite infestations in mammals or birds which comprise:
This invention also provides for spot-on formulations comprising a combination comprising a compound of formula (I) and a macrocyclic lactone which exhibit synergistic activity against parasites when compared to formulations which contain only one class of therapeutic agent.
This invention further provides for formulations which, when applied locally, will diffuse over the entire body of the host and then dry, without crystallizing, and which do not affect the appearance of the coat after drying by, for example, leaving crystals or making the coat sticky. This has the further advantage in animals which groom themselves of not being orally ingested, where the therapeutic agent might not be well tolerated orally or might interact with other therapeutic agents.
The very high effectiveness of the method and of the formulations according to the invention provides not only for a high instantaneous effectiveness but also for an effectiveness of very long duration after the treatment of the animal.
These and other embodiments are disclosed or are obvious from and encompassed by, the following Detailed Description.
This invention provides for a spot-on formulation for the treatment and prophylaxis of parasite infestation in mammals or birds which comprises
More preferably, this invention provides for a spot-on formulation which comprises:
Especially preferred are spot-on formulations described above wherein both compounds of formula I and a macrocyclic lactone antihelmintic or antiparasitic agent such as emamectin are present. Especially more preferred are more composition wherein the ring formed by the divalent alkylene radical representing R5 and R6 and the nitrogen atom to which R5 and R6 are attached has 5, 6 or 7 members or wherein R1 is CN, R3 is C1-C6-haloalkyl, R4 is NH2, R11 and R12 are, independently of one another, hydrogen or halogen and R13 is C1-C6-haloalkyl.
Preferred are spot-on compositions, wherein the composition comprises:
Especially preferred are spot-on compositions, wherein the composition comprises:
Most especially preferred are spot-on compositions, wherein the composition comprises:
The phenylpyrazoles (“compound A”) as a class are known in the art and are described, for example, in copending applications U.S. Ser. Nos. 07/719,942; 08/933,016; 09/174,598; 08/863,182; and 08/863,692, as well as in U.S. Pat. No. 5,576,429; U.S. Pat. No. 5,122,530, and EP 295 177, the disclosures of which, as well as the references cited herein, are incorporated by reference. This class of insecticides is known to possess excellent activity against insects, such as ticks and fleas.
The macrocyclic lactone antihelmintic or parasitic agents (“compound B”) are well known to a person skilled in the art and are easily obtained either commercially or through techniques know in the art. Reference is made to the widely available technical and commercial literature. For avermectins, ivermectin and abamectin, reference may be made, for example, to the work “Ivermectin and Abamectin”, 1989, by M. H. Fischer and H. Mrozik, William C. Campbell, published by Springer Verlag., or Albers-Schönberg et al. (1981), “Avermectins Structure Determination”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 103, 4216-4221. For doramectin, “Veterinary Parasitology”, vol. 49, No. 1, Jul. 1993, 5-15 may in particular be consulted. For milbemycins, reference may be made, inter alia, to Davies H. G. et al., 1986, “Avermectins and Milbemycins”, Nat. Prod. Rep., 3, 87-121, Mrozik H. et al., 1983, Synthesis of Milbemycins from Avermectins, Tetrahedron Lett., 24, 5333-5336, U.S. Pat. No. 4,134,973 and EP 677,054. For latidectin, “International Nonproprietary Names for Pharmaceutical Substances (INN)”. World Health Organization (WHO) Drug Information, vol. 17, no. 4, page 278-279, (2003), may in particular be consulted.
Compounds (B) are either natural products or are semi-synthetic derivatives thereof. The structure of at least certain compounds (B) are closely related, e.g., by sharing a complex 16-membered macrocyclic lactone ring. The natural product avermectins are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,310,519 to Albers-Schönberg, et al., and the 22,23-dihydro avermectin compounds are disclosed in Chabala, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,199,569. Mention is also made of Kitano, U.S. Pat. No. 4,468,390, Beuvry et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,653, European Patent Application 0 007 812 A1, published Jun. 2, 1980, U.K. Patent Specification 1 390 336, published Apr. 9, 1975, European Patent Application 0 002 916 A2, and Ancare New Zealand Patent No. 237 086, inter alia. Naturally occurring milbemycins are described in Aoki et al., U.S. Pat. No. 3,950,360 as well as in the various references cited in “The Merck Index” 12th ed., S. Budavari, Ed., Merck & Co., Inc. Whitehouse Station, N.J. (1996). Semisynthetic derivatives of these classes of compounds are well known in the art and are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,077,308, U.S. Pat. No. 4,859,657, U.S. Pat. No. 4,963,582, U.S. Pat. No. 4,855,317, U.S. Pat. No. 4,871,719, U.S. Pat. No. 4,874,749, U.S. Pat. No. 4,427,663, U.S. Pat. No. 4,310,519, U.S. Pat. No. 4,199,569, U.S. Pat. No. 5,055,596, U.S. Pat. No. 4,973,711, U.S. Pat. No. 4,978,677, U.S. Pat. No. 4,920,148 and EP 667,054.
Particularly preferred macrocyclic lactones are avermectin derivatives which are monosaccharides and have a 5-oxime substituent. Particularly preferred derivatives are:
wherein the broken line at the 22-23 position represents an optional bond, R1, when present, is a hydrogen or a hydroxyl group, R2 is, for example, alkyl or cycloalkyl group and R3 is, for example, hydrogen or alkyl. An especially preferred compound of this general structure is selamectin which has the following structure:
These compounds are known in the art and are described for example in EP 667,054. An other especially preferred compound is emamectin, which has the following structure:
Other preferred macrocyclic lactones are avermectin derivatives where the C-13 position of the lactone ring is substituted with an ester-based moiety such as latidectin:
These ester based derivatives can also be viewed as intermediate compounds which can be converted to milbemycin-type compounds by cleaving the ester moiety at the C-13 position and further converted to avermectin-type compounds by glycosylating the subsequently free —OH at the C-13 position. These conversions can be accomplished via synthetic organic techniques well-known in the art, see e.g. “Protecting Groups in Organic Synthesis (Third Edition)”, by Green & Wuts, Wiley-Interscience, (1999); “Preparative Carbohydrate Chemistry”, edited by Stephen Hanessian, Marcel-Dekker, Inc., (1997); “Monosaccharides—Their Chemistry and Their Roles in Natural Products”, Collins & Ferrier, John Wiley & Sons, (1995).
For example, cleaving the ester moieties of latidectin and lepimectin and glycosylating with a 2,6-dideoxy-3-O-methyl-4-O-(2,4,6-trideoxy-3-O-methyl-4-methylamino-α-L-lyxo-hexapyranosyl)-α-L-arabino-hexapyranoside results in a homolog and an isomer of emamectin respectively.
The alkyl radicals of the definition of the compounds (A) of the formula (I) generally comprise from 1 to 6 carbon atoms. The ring formed by the divalent alkylene radical representing R5 and R6 and the nitrogen atom to which R5 and R6 are attached is generally a 5-, 6- or 7-membered ring.
A preferred class of compounds (A) of formula (I) comprises the compounds such that R1 is CN, R3 is haloalkyl, R4 is NH2, R11 and R12 are, independently of one another, a halogen atom and R13 is haloalkyl. Preferably still, X is C—R12. A compound of formula (I) which is very particularly preferred in the invention is 1-[2,6-Cl2-4-CF3phenyl]-3-CN-4-[SO—CF3]-5-NH2pyrazole or fipronil.
More generally, compounds (A) are pyrazoles such as phenylpyrazoles and N-arylpyrazoles, and reference is made to, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,567,429, U.S. Pat. No. 5,122,530, EP 295,117, and EP 846,686 A1 (or Banks GB 9,625,045, filed Nov. 30, 1996 also believed to be equivalent to U.S. Ser. No. 309,229, filed Nov. 17, 1997).
Compounds of formula (I) can be prepared according to one or other of the processes described in Patent Applications WO 87/3781, 93/6089 and 94/21606 or European Patent Application 295,117 or any other process coming within the competence of a person skilled in the art who is an expert in chemical synthesis. For the chemical preparation of the products of the invention, a person skilled in the art is regarded as having at his disposal, inter alia, the entire contents of “Chemical Abstracts” and of the documents which are cited therein.
Administration of the inventive formulation may be intermittent in time and may be administered daily, weekly, biweekly, monthly, bimonthly, quarterly, or even for longer durations of time. The time period between treatments depends upon factors such as the parasite(s) being treated, the degree of infestation, the type of mammal or bird and the environment where it resides. It is well within the skill level of the practitioner to determine a specific administration period for a particular situation. This invention contemplates a method for permanently combating a parasite in an environment in which the animal is subjected to strong parasitic pressure where the administration is at a frequency far below a daily administration in this case. For example, it is preferable for the treatment according to the invention to be carried out monthly on dogs and on cats.
Spot-on formulations may be prepared by dissolving the active ingredients into the pharmaceutically or veterinary acceptable vehicle. Alternatively, the spot-on formulation can be prepared by encapsulation of the active ingredient to leave a residue of the therapeutic agent on the surface of the animal. These formulations will vary with regard to the weight of the therapeutic agent in the combination depending on the species of host animal to be treated, the severity and type of infection and the body weight of the host. The compounds may be administered continuously, particularly for prophylaxis, by known methods. Generally, a dose of from about 0.001 to about 10 mg per kg of body weight given as a single dose or in divided doses for a period of from 1 to 5 days will be satisfactory but, of course, there can be instance where higher or lower dosage ranges are indicated and such are within the scope of this invention. It is well within the routine skill of the practitioner to determine a particular dosing regimen for a specific host and parasite.
Preferably, a single formulation containing the compounds (A) and (B) in a substantially liquid carrier and in a form which makes possible a single application, or an application repeated a small number of times, will be administered to the animal over a highly localized region of the animal, preferably between the two shoulders. Remarkably, it has been discovered that such a formulation is highly effective against both the targeted ectoparasites and the targeted endoparasites.
The treatment is preferably carried out so as to administer to the host, on a single occasion, a dose containing between about 0.001 and about 100 mg/kg of derivative (A) and containing between about 0.1 and about 2000 μg/kg, more preferably 1000 μg/kg of compound of type (B), in particular in the case of a direct topical administration.
The amount of compound (A) for birds and animals which are small in size is preferably greater than about 0.01 mg and in a particularly preferred way between about 1 and about 50 mg/kg of weight of animal.
It also may be preferable to use controlled-release formulations. However, due to the persistence of the activity of fipronil and of compounds (B), it may be preferable for reasons of simplicity to use conventional vehicles.
This invention also provides for a method for cleaning the coats and the skin of animals by removal of the parasites which are present and of their waste and excreta. The animals treated thus exhibit a coat which is more pleasing to the eye and more pleasant to the touch.
While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the invention spot-on formulation work by the dose dissolving in the natural oils of the host's skin, fur or feathers. From there, the therapeutic agent(s) distribute around the host's body through the sebaceous glands of the skin. The therapeutic agent also remains in the sebaceous glands. Thus, the glands provide a natural reservoir for the therapeutic agent which allows for the agent to be drained back out to the follicles to reapply itself to the skin and hair. This, in turn, provides for longer time periods between application as well as not having to re-administer the dose after the host becomes wet because of rain, bathes, etc. Moreover, the inventive formulation have the further advantage in self-grooming animals of not being directly deposited of the skin or fur where the animals could orally ingest the therapeutic agent, thereby becoming sick or possibly interacting with other therapeutic agent being orally administered.
The invention also relates to such a method with a therapeutic aim intended for the treatment and prevention of parasitoses having pathogenic consequences.
In another preferred embodiment this provides for a composition for combating fleas in small mammals, in particular dogs and cats, characterized in that it contains at least one compound (A) of formula (I) as defined above and at least one endectocidal compound (B), in amounts and proportions having a parasitical effectiveness for fleas and worms, in a vehicle acceptable for the animal.
The preferred class of compounds of formula (I) is that which has been defined above.
A compound of formula (I) which is very particularly preferred in the invention is 1-[2,6-Cl2-4-CF3 phenyl]-3-CN-4-[SO—CF3]-5-NH2 pyrazole.
Among the compounds of type (B), for small animals, a compound selected from the group formed by ivermectin, selamectin, emamectin, latidectin, lepimectin and milbemectin is especially preferred.
The effective amount in a dose is, for the compound (A), preferably between about 0.001, preferentially about 0.1, and about 100 mg and in a particularly preferred way from about 1 to about 50 mg/kg of weight of animal, the higher amounts being provided for very prolonged release in or on the body of the animal.
The effective amount of compounds (B) in a dose is preferably between about 0.1 μg, preferentially about 1 μg, and about 10 mg and in a particularly preferred way from about 5 to about 200 μg/kg of weight of animal. Especially preferred is a dose between about 0.1 to about 10 mg/kg of weight of animal, with about 0.5 to 6 mg/kg being most especially preferred.
The proportions, by weight, of compound (A) and of compound (B) are preferably between about 5/1 and about 10,000/1.
The formulations of the present invention provide for the topical administration of a concentrated solution, suspension, microemulsion or emulsion for intermittent application to a spot on the animal, generally between the two shoulders (solution of spot-on type). It has been discovered that the inventive formulations are especially active against parasites when the formulations are applied to mammals and birds, especially poultry, dogs, cats, sheep, pigs, cattle and horses. These formulations comprise a composition of an effective amount of compound A and/or compound B dissolved in a pharmaceutical or veterinary acceptable carrier vehicle where a crystallization inhibitor is optionally present. Compound of (A) can advantageously be present in this formulation in a proportion of about 1 to about 20%, preferably of about 5 to about 15% (percentages as weight by volume=w/v). The liquid carrier vehicle comprises a pharmaceutically or veterinary acceptable organic solvent and optionally an organic cosolvent.
An especially preferred embodiment is spot-on formulation comprising a compound of formula (I) and emamectin or a salt thereof, with spot-on formulations comprising fipronil and emamectin being most especially preferred. It was discovered that a spot-on combination comprising a compound of formula (I) and emamectin or a salt thereof exhibited significantly greater efficacy against flea and ticks then a compound of formula (I) overtime.
Also contemplated are the pharmaceutically or veterinary acceptable acid or base salts, where applicable, of the active compounds provided for herein. The term “acid” contemplates all pharmaceutically or veterinary acceptable inorganic or organic acids. Inorganic acids include mineral acids such as hydrohalic acids, such as hydrobromic and hydrochloric acids, sulfuric acids, phosphoric acids and nitric acids. Organic acids include all pharmaceutically or veterinary acceptable aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic carboxylic acids, dicarboxylic acids tricarboxylic acids and fatty acids. Preferred acids are straight chain or branched, saturated or unsaturated C1-C20 aliphatic carboxylic acids, which are optionally substituted by halogen or by hydroxyl groups, or C6-C12 aromatic carboxylic acids. Examples of such acids are carbonic acid, formic acid, fumaric acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, isopropionic acid, valeric acid, α-hydroxy acids, such as glycolic acid and lactic acid, chloroacetic acid, benzoic acid, methane sulfonic acid, and salicylic acid. Examples of dicarboxylic acids include oxalic acid, malic acid, succinic acid, tataric acid and maleic acid. An example of a tricarboxylic acid is citric acid. Fatty acids include all pharmaceutically or veterinary acceptable saturated or unsaturated aliphatic or aromatic carboxylic acids having 4 to 24 carbon atoms. Examples include butyric acid, isobutyric acid, sec-butyric acid, lauric acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, and phenylsteric acid. Other acids include gluconic acid, glycoheptonic acid and lactobionic acid.
The term “base” contemplates all pharmaceutically or veterinary acceptable inorganic or organic bases. Such bases include, for example, the alkali metal and alkaline earth metal salts, such as the lithium, sodium, potassium, magnesium or calcium salts. Organic bases include the common hydrocarbyl and heterocyclic amine salts, which include, for example, the morpholine and piperidine salts.
Preferred salts for emamectin include the acid mineral salts, such as the hydrochloride, nitrate, sulfate, phosphate salts, and the organic acids such as the tartarate and malate salts. Especially preferred salts are salts of the formula:
The organic solvent for the liquid carrier vehicle will preferably have a dielectric constant of between about 10 and about 35, preferably between about 20 and about 30, the content of this solvent in the overall composition preferably representing the remainder to 100% of the composition. It is well within the skill level of the practitioner to select a suitable solvent on the basis of these parameters.
The organic cosolvent for the liquid carrier vehicle will preferably have a boiling point of less than about 100° C., preferably of less than about 80° C., and will have a dielectric constant of between about 10 and about 40, preferably between about 20 and about 30; this cosolvent can advantageously be present in the composition according to a weight/weight (w/w) ratio with respect to the solvent of between about 1/15 and about ½; the cosolvent is volatile in order to act in particular as drying promoter and is miscible with water and/or with the solvent. Again, it is well within the skill level of the practitioner to select a suitable solvent on the basis of these parameters.
The organic solvent for the liquid carrier includes the commonly acceptable organic solvents known in the formulation art. These solvents may be found, for example, in Remington Pharmaceutical Science, 16th Edition (1986). These solvents include, for example, acetone, ethyl acetate, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, dimethylformamide, dichloromethane or diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (Transcutol). These solvents can be supplemented by various excipients according to the nature of the desired phases, such as C8-C10 caprylic/capric triglyceride (Estasan or Miglyol 812), oleic acid or propylene glycol.
The liquid carrier may also comprise a microemulsion. Microemulsions are also well suited as the liquid carrier vehicle. Microemulsions are quaternary systems comprising an aqueous phase, an oily phase, a surfactant and a cosurfactant. They are translucent and isotropic liquids.
Microemulsions are composed of stable dispersions of microdroplets of the aqueous phase in the oily phase or conversely of microdroplets of the oily phase in the aqueous phase. The size of these microdroplets is less than 200 nm (1000 to 100,000 nm for emulsions). The interfacial film is composed of an alternation of surface-active (SA) and co-surface-active (Co-SA) molecules which, by lowering the interfacial tension, allows the microemulsion to be formed spontaneously.
The oily phase can in particular be formed from mineral or vegetable oils, from unsaturated polyglycosylated glycerides or from triglycerides, or alternatively from mixtures of such compounds. The oily phase preferably comprises triglycerides and more preferably medium-chain triglycerides, for example C8-C10 caprylic/capric triglyceride. The oily phase will represent, in particular, from about 2 to about 15%, more particularly from about 7 to about 10%, preferably from about 8 to about 9%, v/v of the microemulsion.
The aqueous phase includes, for example water or glycol derivatives, such as propylene glycol, glycol ethers, polyethylene glycols or glycerol. Propylene glycol, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether and dipropylene glycol monoethyl ether are especially preferred. Generally, the aqueous phase will represent a proportion from about 1 to about 4% v/v in the microemulsion.
Surfactants for the microemulsion include diethylene glycol monoethyl ether, dipropyelene glycol monomethyl ether, polyglycolysed C8-C10 glycerides or polyglyceryl-6 dioleate. In addition to these surfactants, the cosurfactants include short-chain alcohols, such as ethanol and propanol.
Some compounds are common to the three components discussed above, i.e., aqueous phase, surfactant and cosurfactant. However, it is well within the skill level of the practitioner to use different compounds for each component of the same formulation.
The cosurfactant to surfactant ratio will preferably be from about 1/7 to about ½. There will preferably be from about 25 to about 75% v/v of surfactant and from about 10 to about 55% v/v of cosurfactant in the microemulsion.
Likewise, the co-solvents are also well known to a practitioner in the formulation art. Preferred co-solvents are those which is a promoter of drying and include, for example, absolute ethanol, isopropanol (2-propanol) or methanol.
The crystallization inhibitor can in particular be present in a proportion of about 1 to about 20% (w/v), preferably of about 5 to about 15%. The inhibitor preferably corresponds to the test in which 0.3 ml of a solution comprising 10% (w/v) of the compound of formula (1) in the liquid carrier and 10% of the inhibitor are deposited on a glass slide at 20° C. and allowed to stand for 24 hours. The slide is then observed with the naked eye. Acceptable inhibitors are those whose addition provides for few or no crystals, and in particular less than 10 crystals, preferably 0 crystals.
Although this is not preferred, the formulation can optionally comprise water, in particular in a proportion of 0 to about 30% (volume by volume v/v), in particular of 0 to about 5%.
The formulation can also comprise an antioxidizing agent intended to inhibit oxidation in air, this agent being in particular present in a proportion of about 0.005 to about 1% (w/v), preferably of about 0.01 to about 0.05%.
Crystallization inhibitors which can be used in the invention include:
In a particularly preferred embodiment, a crystallization inhibitor pair will be used. Such pairs include, for example, the combination of a film-forming agent of polymeric type and of a surface-active agent. These agents will be selected in particular from the compounds mentioned above as crystallization inhibitor.
Particularly preferred film-forming agents of polymeric type include:
Especially preferred surface-active agents, include those made of non-ionic surfactants, preferably polyoxyethylenated esters of sorbitan and in particular the various grades of polysorbate, for example Polysorbate 80.
The film-forming agent and the surface-active agent can in particular be incorporated in similar or identical amounts within the limit of the total amounts of crystallization inhibitor mentioned elsewhere.
The pair thus constituted secures, in a noteworthy way, the objectives of absence of crystallization on the coat and of maintenance of the cosmetic appearance of the fur, that is to say without a tendency towards sticking or towards a sticky appearance, despite the high concentration of active material.
Particularly preferred antioxidizing agents are those conventional in the art and include, for example, butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene, ascorbic acid, sodium metabisulphite, propyl gallate, sodium thiosulphate or a mixture of not more than two of them.
The formulation adjuvants discussed above are well known to the practitioner in this art and may be obtained commercially or through known techniques. These concentrated compositions are generally prepared by simple mixing of the constituents as defined above; advantageously, the starting point is to mix the active material in the main solvent and then the other ingredients or adjuvants are added.
The volume applied can be of the order of about 0.3 to about 1 ml, preferably of the order of about 0.5 ml, for cats and of the order of about 0.3 to about 3 ml for dogs, depending on the weight of the animal.
An especially preferred compound (A) is a derivative of formula (II):
The formulations according to the invention are extremely effective for long durations of time in the treatment of parasites such as fleas of mammals and, in particular, of small mammals such as dogs and cats. The inventive formulations exhibit a degree of effectiveness against other parasitic insects and in particular ticks, mites, mosquitoes and flies. Moreover, the inventive formulations are also extremely effective for a long duration in the treatment of endoparasites, such as the dirofilariasis parasite and/or heartworms and/or roundworms. The inventive formulations further exhibit synergy when treating infestations cause by ectoparasites and endoparasites. A particularly preferred synergistic formulation for the treatment of filariae and heartworms and roundworms comprises fipronil and milbemectin, fipronil and selamectin, fipronil and emamectin, fipronil and latidectin or fipronil and lepimectin.
This invention also provides for the use of at least one compound of formula (I) and of at least one compound of type (B), as defined above, in the preparation of a composition as defined above.
Other advantages and characteristics of the invention will become apparent on reading the following description, given by way of non-limiting examples.
A concentrated solution for cutaneous application is prepared which contains, as weight by volume of solution, 10% of fipronil and 0.25% of ivermectin. The administration volume is 1 ml per 10 kg of animal weight. The composition is as follows, as weight/volume:
A concentrated solution for cutaneous application may be prepared which contains, as weight by volume of solution, 10% of fipronil and 0.25% of latidectin. The administration volume can be 1 ml per 10 kg of animal weight. The composition may be as follows, as weight/volume:
A concentrated solution for cutaneous application may be prepared which contains, as weight by volume of solution, 10% of fipronil and 0.25% of lepimectin. The administration volume can be 1 ml per 10 kg of animal weight. The composition may be as follows, as weight/volume:
The ingredients used are as follows:
A composition example contains:
In the formulation described, the Transcutol acts as the surfactant (SA) and the ethanol or 2-propanol acts as cosurfactant (Co-SA). They make it possible to obtain, from a mixture of medium-chain triglycerides (Estasan) which is immiscible with propylene glycol, an isotropic transparent microemulsion. The crystallization inhibitor pair will be added once the microemulsion has been formed.
The ingredients which may be used are as follows:
A composition example may contain:
In the formulation described, the Transcutol acts as the surfactant (SA) and the ethanol or 2-propanol acts as cosurfactant (Co-SA). They make it possible to obtain, from a mixture of medium-chain triglycerides (Estasan) which is immiscible with propylene glycol, an isotropic transparent microemulsion. The crystallization inhibitor pair will be added once the microemulsion has been formed.
The ingredients which may be used are as follows:
A composition example may contain:
In the formulation described, the Transcutol acts as the surfactant (SA) and the ethanol or 2-propanol acts as cosurfactant (Co-SA). They make it possible to obtain, from a mixture of medium-chain triglycerides (Estasan) which is immiscible with propylene glycol, an isotropic transparent microemulsion. The crystallization inhibitor pair will be added once the microemulsion has been formed.
Five dogs weighing 12 kg, receive the application of 1 ml of composition according to Example 2 or 3, i.e. 100 mg of fipronil and 2.5 mg of ivermectin, by localized cutaneous application between the two shoulders. The measurements carried out on the plasma of the animals show the production of an ivermectin peak of 1000 to 1500 to 2000 pg/ml.
A monthly or even bimonthly treatment of dogs makes possible complete control of fleas, ticks and dirofilariasis parasites.
This example was conducted in order to demonstrate the pharmacokinetics of ivermectin in the dog after oral administration of Cardomec® at a dose of 6 μg.kg−1 of ivermectin which is known to be 100% effective on heartworms and to have a route of reference for further development.
Five male Beagle dogs received a dose of approximately 6 μg.kg-1 of ivermectin, i.e., one 68 μg Cardomec® tablet per dog. The animals were fasted prior to administration and up to 6 hours after treatment to prevent a possible interaction with food.
Blood samples were collected at intervals up to 28 days post-dosing. The determination of ivermectin in dog plasma was carried out by HPLC using fluorescence detection after derivatization. The limit of quantification was 100 pg.ml−1.
Ivermectin could be quantified in dog plasma up to day 1 or 7, depending on the dog (Table 1). The profiles were very variable, presenting a first order absorption with one or two peaks and a biexponential depletion.
The pharmacokinetic parameters were very variable (Tables 2 and 3). Cmax ranged between 422 and 2964 pg.ml−1, tmax between 3 and 12 h, AUC between 9164 and 90938 pg.h.ml−1. The ratio between the highest and smallest Cmax was 7, the differences even more striking for AUC(0−t) and AUC with ratios of 17 and 10 respectively. Compared with the other parameters, the terminal half-lives (t½) were relatively similar between animals (CV<40%), ranging between 26.0 and 64.5 h, i.e. 1.08 day and 2.69 days. The mean value of the terminal half-life was 40.1 h (1.67 d).
The mean pharmacokinetic parameters determined from the present study are in good agreement with the literature: 3 h for tmax compared with the literature data of 2-4 hours, t½=1.67 d against 1.6 to 1.8 d in the literature. Cmax and AUC only were low with values of 1362 pg.ml−1 and 44604 pg.h.ml−1 versus mean literature values of more than 2000 pg. ml−1 and 107318 pg.h.ml−1−, respectively. This experiment was conducted on fasted animals. Some prior articles mentioned a possible interaction of ivermectin with food, without the food state of the dogs being specified. It is possible that they were unfasted and that food interacts positively with ivermectin absorption, i.e., increases the rate and extent of absorption of ivermectin and therefore leads to higher Cmax and AUC than in the present experiment.
Two conclusions can be drawn from this study: the inter-animal variability is an important feature and the terminal half-lives are relatively constant (around 2 days).
The following composition according to the present invention was prepared:
The following comparison topical composition was prepared:
The inventive composition and the comparative composition were tested for their effectiveness on the flea and tick infestations on dogs. Beagles were infested with approximately 50 Rhipicephalus sanguineus (ticks) on days 14, 20, 27, 34, 41, 48 and 62 and with approximately 100 Ctenocephalides felis on days 15, 28, 42, and 70. The fleas were counted and removed 24 hour after each infestation and the ticks were counted and removed from all dogs after 48 hours of infestation. There were four dogs in each group. A topical formulation dosage rates 1.0 ml/10 kg of body weight of the topical formulation was applied on the midline of the neck, between the base of the skull and the shoulder blade. Table I reports the average percent efficiency against flea and tick counts for each of the biological example compared to the placebo.
The data presented in Table I demonstrate that the inventive composition exhibits a far greater efficacy against fleas and ticks than either fipronil or emamectin alone.
The invention is further described by the following numbered paragraphs:
The above description of the invention is intended to be illustrative and not limiting. Various changes or modifications in the embodiments described herein may occur to those skilled in the art. These can be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 96/11446 | Sep 1996 | FR | national |
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No.: 10/279,356, filed Oct. 24, 2002, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No.: 10/155,397, filed May 24, 2002, now pending, which in turn is a divisional of application Ser. No.: 09/376,736, filed Aug. 17, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,426,333 issued on Jul. 30, 2002, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No.: 09/271,470, filed Mar. 17, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,482,425 issued on Nov. 19, 2002, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of copending International Application PCT/FR97/01548 having an international filing date of 15 Sep. 1997, and designating the U.S. and claiming priority from French Application No. 96/11446, filed 19 Sep. 1996. Reference is also made to: U.S. application Ser. No. 08/719,942, filed Sep. 25, 1996, Ser. No. 08/692,430, filed Aug. 5, 1996, Ser. No. 08/863,182, filed May 27, 1997, Ser. No. 08/692,113, filed Aug. 5, 1996, Ser. No. 08/863,392, filed May 27, 1997, and Ser. No. 08/891,047, filed Jul. 10, 1997; French Application No. 97 03709, filed Mar. 26, 1997; and PCT/FR98/00601. All of the above-mentioned applications, as well as all documents cited herein and documents referenced or cited in documents cited herein, are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09376736 | Aug 1999 | US |
| Child | 10155397 | May 2002 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10279356 | Oct 2002 | US |
| Child | 11055234 | May 2005 | US |
| Parent | 10155397 | May 2002 | US |
| Child | 10279356 | Oct 2002 | US |
| Parent | 09271470 | Mar 1999 | US |
| Child | 09376736 | Aug 1999 | US |
| Parent | PCT/FR97/01548 | Sep 1997 | US |
| Child | 09271470 | Mar 1999 | US |
