Patent Application
20050263496
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a spot welding system using a robot.
2. Description of the Related Art
A spot welding system using a plurality of robots to perform spot-welding, individually, on a plurality of welding points in a workpiece, such as a vehicle body or the like, has been conventionally known. In this type of spot welding system, an operator instructs welding conditions (such as a welding current, a pressing force, etc.) individually to the robots so as to cause the robots to perform welding operations. After welding has been performed, the operator adjusts the welding conditions for individual robots as occasion demands. In a case where the robots having the same mechanical configuration perform the welding operations on the welding points having the same attributes of workpiece, such as a material, a thickness, etc., using spot welding guns and welding control units of the same type, it is confirmed that a welding result obtained by any one robot under the given welding conditions is good, and thereafter the same welding conditions are instructed to the other robots.
Thus, in the conventional spot welding system, when the robots perform the welding operations for one workpiece (such as a vehicle body), the welding conditions adapted to the respective welding points are instructed to the respective robots and are adjusted individually as occasion demands, so that a significant amount of time has been spent on the setting and adjusting of the welding conditions for the system in its entirety. Also, in a case where the different welding conditions are set for the welding points having the same workpiece attributes, a complicated verification work is required, such as comparing the cycle times of actual welding operations under the respective welding conditions with each other, in order to judge which welding condition is the most suitable.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a spot welding system using a robot, which is capable of readily and appropriately setting welding conditions to be instructed individually to a plurality of robots, when the plural robots are used to perform spot-welding individually on a plurality of welding points.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a spot welding system using a robot, which is capable of comparing and evaluating the validity of welding conditions to be instructed individually to a plurality of robots, and capable of instructing the welding conditions having high validity to the respective robots, when the plural robots are used to perform spot-welding individually on a plurality of welding points.
In order to accomplish the above objects, the present invention provides a spot welding system comprising first and second spot welding robots; and a communication line connecting the first and second spot welding robots with each other so as to permit communication therebetween; the first spot welding robot comprising a data transmitting section for transmitting welding data defining welding operations of the first and second spot welding robots through the communication line to the second spot welding robot; and a first control section for causing the first spot welding robot to perform a welding operation based on the welding data; the second spot welding robot comprising a data receiving section for receiving the welding data transmitted from the data transmitting section of the first spot welding robot through the communication line; and a second control section for causing the second spot welding robot to perform a welding operation based on the welding data received by the data receiving section.
In the above spot welding system, the welding data may include welding condition data defining welding conditions under which the first and second spot welding robots perform the welding operations.
The welding data may further include welding definition data defining attributes of welding points of an objective workpiece for which the first and second spot welding robots perform the welding operations, as well as welding configurations of the first and second spot welding robots.
The welding data may further include evaluation data representing a result of the welding operation performed by the first spot welding robot.
The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description of preferred embodiments in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The embodiments of the present invention are described below in detail, with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, the same or similar components are denoted by common reference numerals.
Referring to the drawings,
The spot welding system 10 according to the present invention includes first and second spot welding robots 12a, 12b, and a communication line 14 connecting the first and second spot welding robots 12a, 12b with each other so as to permit communication therebetween. The first spot welding robot 12a includes a data transmitting section 18 for transmitting welding data 16 defining welding operations of the first and second spot welding robots 12a, 12b through the communication line 14 to the second spot welding robot 12b, and a first control section 20 for causing the first spot welding robot 12a to perform a welding operation on the basis of the welding data 16. The second spot welding robot 12b includes a data receiving section 22 for receiving the welding data 16 transmitted through the communication line 14 from the data transmitting section 18 of the first spot welding robot 12a, and a second control section 24 for causing the second spot welding robot 12b to perform a welding operation on the basis of the welding data 16 received by the data receiving section 22.
In this configuration, the welding data 16 may include welding condition data (such as a welding current, a pressing force, etc.) defining welding conditions under which the first and second spot welding robots 12a, 12b perform the welding operations.
According to the spot welding system 10 having the above configuration, if the welding data 16 are set or adjusted in the first spot welding robot 12a, the contents of the set or adjusted welding data are automatically transmitted through the communication line 14 to the second spot welding robot 12b, and thereby the first and second spot welding robots 12a, 12b respectively perform the welding operations on the basis of the common welding data 16. In this connection, in a case where the first and second spot welding robots 12a, 12b have the same welding configuration (the configuration of a spot welding gun, a welding control unit, etc.) and the attributes of workpiece at the welding points to be welded, such as a material, a thickness, etc., are identical to each other, it is possible to readily and appropriately set the common welding conditions to be instructed individually to the spot welding robots 12a, 12b, by providing welding condition data for the welding data 16. It should be noted that the spot welding system 10 may include two or more spot welding robots 12, each of these spot welding robots 12 being able to alternatively function as either of the first and second spot welding robots 12a, 12b.
On the other hand, the second spot welding robot 12b further includes a second storage section 28 for storing the welding condition data 16a received by the data receiving section 22. In this arrangement, the second control section 24 causes the second spot welding robot 12b to perform the welding operation on the basis of the welding condition data 16a stored in the second storage section 28.
According to the configuration of
In the spot welding system 10 of
On the other hand, the second spot welding robot 12b further includes a second storage section 28 for storing the welding condition data 16a and the welding definition data 16b, both received by the data receiving section 22. In this arrangement, the second control section 24 causes the second spot welding robot 12b to perform the welding operation, on the basis of the welding condition data 16a stored in the second storage section 28, on a welding point defined by the welding definition data 16b stored in the second storage section 28.
According to the configuration of
On the other hand, the second spot welding robot 12b further includes a second storage section 28 for storing the welding condition data 16a and the evaluation data 16c, both received by the data receiving section 22. In this arrangement, the second control section 24 causes the second spot welding robot 12b to perform the welding operation on the basis of the welding condition data 16a stored in the second storage section 28.
According to the configuration of
In the spot welding system 10 of
On the other hand, the second spot welding robot 12b further includes a second storage section 28 for storing the welding condition data 16a, the evaluation data 16c and the welding definition data 16b, received by the data receiving section 22. In this arrangement, the second control section 24 causes the second spot welding robot 12b to perform the welding operation, on the basis of the welding condition data 16a stored in the second storage section 28, on a welding point defined by the welding definition data 16b stored in the second storage section 28.
According to the configuration of
On the other hand, the second spot welding robot 12b further includes a second comparing section 32 for comparing the evaluation data 16c in connection with the plural times of welding operations, received by the data receiving section 22, with each other, and a second storage section 28 for storing evaluation data 16c representing a better result, among the evaluation data 16c compared by the second comparing section 32, in a manner as to be associated with welding condition data 16a leading to the better result, among the welding condition data 16a in connection with the plural times of welding operations. In this arrangement, the second control section 24 causes the second spot welding robot 12b to perform the welding operation on the basis of the welding condition data 16a stored in the second storage section 28.
According to the configuration of
In the spot welding system 10 of
On the other hand, the second spot welding robot 12b further includes a second comparing section 32 for comparing the evaluation data 16c in connection with the plural times of welding operations, received by the data receiving section 22, with each other, and a second storage section 28 for storing evaluation data 16c representing a better result, among the evaluation data 16c compared by the second comparing section 32, in a manner as to be associated with welding condition data 16a and welding definition data 16b, leading to the better result, among the welding condition data 16a and the welding definition data 16b in connection with the plural times of welding operations, received by the data receiving section 22. In this arrangement, the second control section 24 causes the second spot welding robot 12b to perform the welding operation, on the basis of the welding condition data 16a stored in the second storage section 28, for a welding point defined by the welding definition data 16b stored in the second storage section 28.
According to the configuration of
According to the configuration of
In the spot welding system 40, a plurality of spot welding robots 42a, 42b, 42c, 42d, 42e (hereinafter simply referred to as robots 42a, 42b, 42c, 42d, 42e) respectively performing spot-welding on a plurality of welding points set on one workpiece, such as a vehicle body, are connected to each other through a communication line 44 forming a part of a communication network, such as Ethernet (trade mark). The robots 42a to 42e have components substantially identical to each other, each of which includes a robot controller 46, a robot mechanical section 48 (hereinafter referred to simply as a mechanical section 48) controlled by the robot controller 46, a spot welding gun 50 mounted to the distal end of the arm of the mechanical section 48, and a welding control unit 52 for controlling the welding operation carried out with the spot welding gun 50. The welding control unit 52 is connected to and is controlled by the robot controller 46.
As already described, in a case where the attributes (the material, the thickness, etc.) of the plural welding points on the workpiece to be spot-welded by the plural robots 42a to 42e are identical to each other, the welding guns 50 and the welding control units 52 of the same type are generally used. In a case where one workpiece includes welding points having different thicknesses and/or materials, the welding guns 50 and the welding control units 52 of different types are mounted respectively to the plural robots 42a to 42e.
The welding condition setting flow as shown in
First, welding definition data for specifying a welded object and welding means are set (step S100). The welding definition data include data of the materials and thicknesses of the welding points as well as data of the types of the spot welding gun 50 and the welding control unit 52. In a case where the attributes (the material and thickness) of the welding points on a workpiece, such as a vehicle body, are identical to each other, data of the material and thickness of the welding points may be omitted. Also, in a case where the plural robots 42a to 42e use the spot welding guns 50 and the welding control units 52 of the same type, data of the types of the spot welding gun 50 and the welding control unit 52 may be omitted.
Next, welding condition data are set (step S101). The welding condition data include data of a pressing force (kgf), a pushing amount of a spot welding tip (mm), a welding condition number of the welding control unit 52 for identifying a welding current and an energizing time, a welding path for spot-welding one welding point (including a relative position, a speed, a positioning format, an acceleration time constant, a condition of a pass command, etc.), a teaching position (including an error from an off-line teaching position), a thickness error of an actual workpiece (mm), and so on.
After the welding definition data and the welding condition data have been set, the robot is instructed to start spot-welding, and a timer is reset and started to measure a cycle time for the spot-welding of a single operation (step S102). The welding control unit 52 controls the welding current and energizing time on the basis of the set welding condition number, and the robot controller 46 controls the mechanical section 48 on the basis of the set welding condition data to perform a welding operation. Then, the CPU of the robot controller 46 judges whether an error signal is generated (step S103), and judges whether the welding process is completed (step S104). If an error is generated, the generation of error is displayed on, e.g., a display unit, so as to urge an operator to correct the welding condition data. After the operator has corrected the welding condition data (step S105), the process returns to step S102 to execute again the spot-welding.
If no error signal is generated and the welding has been completed, the measurement of time with the timer is stopped (step S106). Then, it is judged whether welding definition data identical to those set at step S100 has already been stored in the memory (step S107). If the welding definition data has not already been stored, the welding definition data and the welding condition data, respectively set at steps S100 and S101, are stored in the memory, and the cycle time obtained at step S106 as a result of measurement with the timer is also stored in the memory as evaluation data (step S112), and thereafter the process proceeds to step S111.
On the other hand, if it is judged that the welding definition data identical to those set at step S100 have already been stored in the memory of the robot controller 46, evaluation data (i.e., a cycle time), that have already been stored in the memory in a manner as to be associated with the welding definition data, are read out and compared with the cycle time obtained at step S106 and relating to a present welding cycle (step S108). If the cycle time of the present welding cycle is shorter (i.e., better), the welding condition data and the cycle time, previously stored in the memory in association with the welding definition data, are rewritten and renewed to the welding condition data set at step S101 and to the cycle time obtained at step S106, respectively. Thus, the welding condition data, associated to the shorter cycle time as the evaluation data, are newly stored. Then, the process proceeds to step S111, and the welding definition data, welding condition data and cycle time, stored at step S112, or the welding condition data and cycle time, renewed at step S110, and the associated welding definition data, are transmitted to the robot controller of the other robots. Each of the other robots receives and stores these transmitted data, as will be described later.
If, at step S109, it is judged that the cycle time of the present welding cycle is longer (i.e., worse), steps S110 and S111 are not executed, and the process flow is terminated. Thus, in connection with the mutually identical welding definition data, the welding condition data, associated to the shorter cycle time as the evaluation data, are stored in the respective robots.
First, it is judged whether the robot controller 46 is set to a valid mode in which a process of renewing the welding condition data is valid (step S200). If the valid mode has not been set, this process flow is terminated. On the other hand, if the valid mode has been set, it is judged whether a flag F showing participation to the network is set to “1” (step S201). If the robot controller 46 is connected to the communication line 44 as a first time, the flag F is not set to “1” and, therefore, the process proceeds to step S202. At step S202, the notice of participation to the network is transmitted to all the robot controllers 46 connected to the communication line 44, and the flag F is set to “1” and, thereafter, the process proceeds to step S203. If, at step S201, it is judged that the flag F is set to “1”, the process proceeds directly to step S203 without executing step S202.
At step S203, it is judged whether the notice of participation to the network has been received from the other robot, and if no notice has been received, the process proceeds to step S206. If the notice has been received, it is then judged whether the robot controller 46 itself is set as a master controller (step S204). In the system 40, any one of the plural robot controllers 46 connected to the communication line 44 may be set as the master controller, and, for example, the robot controller 46 connected to the communication line 44 at the earliest timing may be set as the master controller. If the setting as the master has not been performed, the process proceeds to step S206. If the setting as the master has been performed, the process proceeds to step S205, where all the welding definition data, the welding condition data and the evaluation data (or the cycle time), stored in the memory, are transmitted to the other robot controllers 46 which have output the notice of participation to the network, and thereafter the process proceeds to step S206.
At step S206, it is judged whether the welding definition data, the welding condition data and the evaluation data have been received from the other robot, and if these data have not been received, the process flow in this period is terminated at this stage. If these data have been received, it is judged whether data coinciding with the received welding definition data exist in data previously stored in the memory (step S207). If no coinciding data exists (e.g., at the first-time connection to the network, the welding definition data are not stored in the memory), the welding definition data, the welding condition data and the evaluation data (or the cycle time) as received are stored in the memory (step S209), and then the process flow in this period is terminated.
On the other hand, if it is judged that the data coinciding with the received welding definition data exist in the data previously stored in the memory, the welding condition data and the evaluation data, associated with the welding definition data, are rewritten and renewed to the welding condition data and the evaluation data as received (step S208), and the process flow for this period is terminated.
In this manner, when the robot controller 46 is connected to the communication line 44 as a first time, the common welding definition data, the welding condition data and the evaluation data stored in the other robot controller already connected to the communication line are stored in the memory of the robot controller 46, and thereby the content of the memory becomes the same as that of the other robot controller 46. As, at step S111 of
For example, in a case where the pushing amount, as one of the welding conditions, is altered in any one robot, and even if the time required to reach a target pressing force is shortened and the cycle time is thereby reduced, it is difficult for the operator to directly recognize the reduction in cycle time. In the above-described embodiment, however, the robot controller 46 automatically recognizes the reduction in cycle time by the comparison of the evaluation data, and transmits the welding condition data leading the superior evaluation data to the other robots, so that all the robots can perform the welding operation under this welding condition and the overall operational efficiency of the spot welding system 40 can be thereby improved. Further, as the welding condition data become uniform, the variation of cycle times in the respective robots can be eliminated, and precision in estimation of the cycle time in an off-line programming system can be improved.
Each robot controller 46 specifies the welding condition data in connection with the welding operation to be performed in itself, on the basis of the designated welding definition data, and controls the welding control unit 52 to perform the spot-welding on the basis of the specified welding condition data.
In the above-described first exemplary process, the plural robots 42a to 42e connected to the communication line 44 perform the respective welding operations on the basis of the welding definition data different from each other, and the system is configured such that any one robot controller 46 transmits the set welding definition data and the associated welding condition data and evaluation data to the other robot controllers 46, and that each of the other robot controllers 46 stores the received welding definition data, the welding condition data and the evaluation data. In contrast to this, in a case where all the plural robots 42a to 42e connected to the communication line 44 perform the welding operations on the basis of the identical welding definition data, the setting and transmission steps of the welding definition data in the first robot can be omitted as follows.
In a case where the plural welding points set on one workpiece, such as a vehicle body, are of identical material and thickness, the welding definition data for all robots 42a to 42e are identical to each other, provided that the robots 42a to 42e connected to the communication line 44 are equipped with the welding guns 50 and the welding control units 52 of the same type, and thereby the setting and transmission steps of the welding definition data in the above-described process flow become unnecessary. Thus, this second exemplary process is embodied by modifying the process flow of
As for the process flow of
Although, in the above-described first and second exemplary processes, the evaluation data are used to evaluate the validity of the welding conditions, the evaluation may be omitted, and thus the welding condition data (and the welding definition data, if any), under which one robot has completed the welding operation with no error, may be transmitted to the other robots. Thus, if the plural robots 42a to 42e connected to the communication line 44 are operated on the basis of the identical welding definition data, a skilled operator familiar with the setting know-how may operate the robot controllers to transmit the welding condition data obtained by one robot through the communication line 44 to, and make these date stored into, all other robots. The quality and the operational efficiency of the system as a whole can be thereby improved.
This third exemplary process is embodied by modifying the process flow of
In a case where the validity of the welding condition is not evaluated and the plural robots 42a to 42e perform the welding operations on the basis of the different welding definition data (i.e., the fourth exemplary process), the welding condition data and the welding definition data, under which any one robot has completed the welding operation with no error, may be transmitted to the other robots. In this arrangement, the process flow of
In the third and fourth exemplary processes, when the welding condition data are set in a robot for which certain welding definition data have been set, the same welding condition data are automatically set to the other robot for which the same welding definition data have been set. Therefore, the welding conditions can be set readily and easily.
In each of the above-described exemplary processes, the system is configured such that various data, such as the welding condition data, the evaluation data, the welding definition data, etc., are automatically transmitted from one robot controller 46 to the other robot controllers 46. In place of the automatic transmission, however, the system may be configured such that various data and a message asking whether the data should be transmitted are displayed on a display (not shown) provided for the robot controller, and only when the operator enters a transmission command, the data are transmitted to the other robots.
The evaluation item of the evaluation data adopted in the above-described first and second exemplary processes is the cycle time measured with a timer, which is a time required for a robot to move from an approach position, do a welding under pressure, and move to a return position, in relation to one welding point. The other evaluation items include a pressurizing time, a travel time, a nugget diameter of spot-welding, and the like. The data of the pressurizing time can be obtained by measuring, in the robot controller 46, a time required from the start of a pressure application to the achievement of a target pressing force, and the data of the travel time can be obtained by subtracting the pressurizing time and energizing time from the cycle time, both of which can be automatically obtained during the welding operation in a way similar to the cycle time. In contrast, as for the measurement of the nugget diameter, it is advantageous that an operator conducts it manually and enters the obtained data to the robot controller 46, because the provision of automatic measurement means leads to increase in cost.
The measurement of the nugget diameter can be carried out using an ultrasonic sensor, a vibration sensor or an infrared camera. In this arrangement, the entry of the nugget diameter measured by the operator is waited at step S106. Then, the comparison and judgment at steps S108 and S109 may be executed on the basis of the entered value of the measured nugget diameter.
In this connection, in the spot welding system 40, there may be a case where it is preferred that different welding evaluation items be adopted for different welding points, i.e., for the respective robots 42a to 42e. For example, even when the evaluation in terms of the nugget diameter is preferred for one welding point, the evaluation in terms of the other items, such as the cycle time or pressurizing time, may be preferred for the other welding point. Therefore, the system may be configured such that it is possible for an operator to select and designate, for each robot, an evaluation item to be used to evaluate the welding result, among the above-described various evaluation items (i.e., the fifth exemplary process).
In this fifth exemplary process, the cycle time, the pressurizing time and the travel time are automatically measured, while the nugget diameter measured by the operator is entered, as the various evaluation data. In this arrangement, the process flow of
Then, at step S107, if it is judged that the same welding definition data are not previously stored in the memory, the process proceeds to step S112, where the welding definition data and the welding condition data are stored in the memory and, in association with them, the various evaluation data are also stored in the memory. At steps S108 and S109, the evaluation data are compared and examined, with respect to the evaluation item designated for the robot. If the evaluation data with respect to the designated evaluation item are better for the present welding cycle, the welding condition data stored in association with the welding definition data are renewed to the welding condition data for the present welding cycle, and the stored evaluation data are rewritten to the present evaluation data, and the process flow is terminated.
The renewing or rewriting process of the welding condition data, conducted at a predetermined period by the other robot controller 46 in the fifth exemplary process, is executed in accordance with the flow chart shown in
In the processing flow of
On the other hand, if the data coinciding with the received welding definition data are previously stored in the memory, evaluation data regarding the evaluation item designated for the robot are selected and read out from the various evaluation data previously stored in the memory in a manner as to be associated with the welding definition data, while evaluation data regarding the designated evaluation item are selected from the various evaluation data as received, and then these selected evaluation data are compared with each other (step S308). Then, it is judged whether the evaluation data for the present welding cycle is better (step S309). If the evaluation data for the present welding cycle is better, the welding condition data and the various evaluation data, stored in the memory in association with the received welding definition data, are rewritten and renewed to the welding condition data and various evaluation data as received (step S310). If the evaluation data for the present welding cycle is not better, the act at step S310 is not executed, and data are not renewed.
In each of the above-described exemplary processes, the system configuration is one in which the plural robots individually perform the spot-welding on the plural welding points on one workpiece, such as a vehicle body. The present invention, however, is not limited to the welding configuration for one workpiece, but may be applied to the system configuration in which plural robots connected to a communication line perform a spot-welding for the plural types of wokpieces.
In any case, according to the present invention, in a spot welding system using robots, it is possible, when a plurality of robots are used to perform a spot-welding on a plurality of welding points, to readily, efficiently and appropriately set welding conditions to be instructed to the respective robots. Further, it is possible to compare and evaluate the validity of the welding conditions instructed to the respective robots, and thus to instruct more appropriate welding conditions to the respective robots.
While the invention has been described with reference to specific preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the following claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-157803 | May 2004 | JP | national |
