1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a member used in a thin film forming apparatus, a plasma treating apparatus or the like in a semiconductor processing process and a method of producing the same, and more particularly to a spray-coated member having an excellent resistance to plasma erosion, which is used as a member for a container used in the plasma processing under an environment containing a halogen compound, for example, a containing used in vacuum deposition, ion plating, sputtering, chemical deposition, laser precision working, plasma sputtering or the like, and a method of producing the same.
2. Description of Related Art
In the semiconductor processing process, there is a step of forming a thin film of a metal, a metal oxide, a nitride, a carbide, a boride, a silicide or the like. In this step is used a thin film-forming apparatus for vacuum deposition, ion plating, sputtering, plasma CVD or the like (e.g. JP-A-50-75370).
When the thin film is formed with such an apparatus, a thin film forming material adheres onto surfaces of various jigs or constituents used in the apparatus. When the adhesion amount of the thin film forming material onto the jig or the constituent is small, the troubles are hardly caused. However, the time of forming the thin film becomes recently long, and hence the adhesion amount of particles to the jig or the constituent increases, and also the change of temperature in the operation and the variation of mechanical load to the jig or the constituent become large. As a result, there is caused a problem that a part of the particles as a main component of the thin film adhered to the surface of the jig or constituent during the formation of the thin film is adhered to a semiconductor wafer through the peeling and scattering to deteriorate the quality of the product.
As to the various constituents used in the aforementioned apparatuses, the following methods are proposed as a technique of preventing the peeling of the thin film-forming particles adhered to the surface of the constituent. For example, JP-A-58-202535 and JP-B-7-35568 disclose a technique that the surface of the jig or the constituent is subjected to a sand blasting and further to a horning or knitting to roughen the surface to thereby increase the surface area effective for preventing the peeling and scattering of the adhered thin-film particles.
JP-A-H03-247769 discloses a technique that U-shaped grooves or V-shaped grooves are periodically formed on the surface of the jig or the constituent at intervals of not more than 5 mm to suppress the peeling of the thin film forming particles.
JP-A-H04-202660 and JP-A-H07-102366 disclose a technique that TiN coating is formed on the surface of the constituent or further a fusion plated coating of Al or Al alloy is formed thereon. Also, JP-A-H06-220618 discloses a technique that Ti—Cu material is spray coated and only Cu is removed with HNO3 to form a coating of a porous surface structure having a large specific surface area to thereby suppress the scattering of the adhered thin film-forming particles.
In Japanese Patent No. 3076768 is proposed a technique that a metal is sprayed onto a surface of a metal member at a metal net adhered state or a metal is sprayed and a metal net is adhered thereon and a metal is again sprayed, and thereafter the metal net is pulled out to form lattice-shaped unevenness on the spray coating, whereby the specific surface area is increased to allow the great amount of the thin film-forming particles adhered thereto.
However, the precision in the recent processing of the semiconductor becomes higher and hence the cleanness of the processing environment becomes further severer. Particularly, when the processing of the semiconductor is carried out by plasma sputtering treatment in a halogen gas or a halogen compound gas, it is required to take a countermeasure on corrosive product produced on the surface of the jig or constituent, which is arranged in the apparatus for this treatment or finer particles generated from the surface of the constituent through sputtering phenomenon.
That is, the rescattering of the thin film forming particles in the formation of the thin film comes into problem in the semiconductor processing process. Also, in the plasma etching process, not only the processing of the semiconductor but also the surrounding members are affected by the etching to generate fine particles, which is pointed out to exert on the quality of the semiconductor product. As a countermeasure therefor, JP-A-2004-52281 recommends that a quartz is used as a substrate so as to have a surface roughness of 3-18 μm and a spray coating of Al2O3 or TiO2 is directly formed thereon and the surface of the spray coating is made to a roughened surface indicating a negative value of less than 0.1 as a skewness (Rsk) of a roughness curve.
Further, JP-A-2000-191370, JP-A-H11-345780, JP-A-2000-72529 and JP-B-H10-330971 disclose a technique for increasing the adhesion and deposited volume of the particles, while JP-A-2000-228398 discloses a technique of forming convex and concave portions dividing the adhered film to reduce the scattering.
in the semiconductor processing process, the conventional techniques have the following problems:
(1) Problems in the Thin Film Forming Process
(a) The techniques disclosed in the above patent articles for preventing the phenomenon of adhering the thin film forming particles to the jig and constituent in the thin film forming process and the scattering thereof, i.e. the method of enlarging the adhesion area of the thin film forming particle by various means recognize a constant effect on the long-time operation for the thin film formation and the improvement of the production efficiency accompanied therewith, but the adhered and deposited thin film forming particles are finally rescattered, so that they can not be a fundamental solution.
(b) Since a surface-treated film formed or treated on the surface of the jig or constituent adhered and deposited with a great amount of the thin film forming particles is a metallic coating, when the thin film forming particles are removed with an acid or an alkali, the surface treated film is simultaneously dissolved, and hence the usable number through the reproduction becomes small, which is a cause of increasing the coat of the product.
(c) The means for enlarging the adhesion area of the thin film forming particles in the conventional techniques merely intends only the enlargement of the area, but does not propose the method of preventing the scattering of the adhered thin film forming particles.
(2) Problems in the Plasma Etching Process
As disclosed in JP-A-2004-52281, the countermeasure for the jig and constituent used in the plasma etching process proposes a technique that the spray coating of Al2O3 or TiO2 is formed on the surface of quartz substrate and also the surface roughness of the spray coating is controlled to a negative value of less than 0.1 of Rsk (skewness of roughness curve), whereby fine particles generated by sputtering phenomenon is received with the surface of the coating having such a roughness curve. However, TiO2 disclosed in this technique is corroded or etched under an environment of the plasma etching containing a halogen gas to produce a great amount of particles as a contamination source. On the other hand, the spray coating of Al2O3 is superior to TiO2 coating in the corrosion resistance and resistance to plasma etching, but is short in the service life, and also the surface form indicating the negative value of Rsk: less than 0.1 is less in the adhesion and deposition amount of the environment contaminating substance and is saturated in a short time, so that the remaining forms a source for generating particles. Further, there is a problem that the convex portions of the surface form show a geometric form being large in the area and easily depositing a great amount of particles thereon and easily rescattering them.
As disclosed in JP-A-H10-4083, a technique of using a single crystal of Y2O3 as a material having a resistance to plasma erosion limits the application because it is difficult to form the coating of such a material. Also, a technique disclosed JP-A-2001-164354 proposing a spray coating of Y2O3 is excellent in the resistance to plasma erosion, but does not examine the adhesion and deposition of the environment contaminating particles.
It is, therefore, an object of the invention to propose a surface structure of a spray coating having an excellent resistance to plasma erosion and highly detoxifying particles adhered and deposited as a cause of contaminating a plasma treating environment and effectively preventing the rescattering.
It is another object of the invention to propose a spray coated member enhancing a semiconductor processing accuracy under a corrosive environment containing a halogen gas and stably conducting the processing over a long period of time and being effective to an improvement of a quality of a semiconductor product and a reduction of a cost as well as a method of producing the same.
The invention is solves the above problems of the conventional techniques through the following technical means:
(1) The invention provides a spray coated member having an excellent resistance to plasma erosion, characterized in that an outermost surface layer portion of a ceramic spray coated portion covering a surface of a substrate is an electron beam irradiated layer.
(2) Also, the invention provides a spray coated member having an excellent resistance to plasma erosion, characterized in that a metallic undercoat is formed on a surface of a substrate and a top coat of a ceramic spray coating is formed thereon and an outermost surface layer portion of the top coat is an electron beam irradiated layer.
(3) Further, the invention provides a method of producing a spray coated member having an excellent resistance to plasma erosion, characterized in that a spraying powder material made from a ceramic having a particle size of 5-80 μm is directly sprayed onto a surface of a substrate or onto a metallic undercoat previously formed on the surface of the substrate to form a ceramic spray coating as a top coat, and then an electron beam is irradiated onto a surface of the spray coating to fuse and solidify an outermost surface layer portion of the coating to form an electron beam irradiated layer.
In the invention, it is preferable that the electron beam irradiated layer has a structure that only a needle-like convex portion located above a center line of a roughness curve in a height direction of the surface of the coating is changed into a trapezoidal convex portion by fusion and solidification accompanied with the electron beam irradiation, and that the ceramic spray coating has a surface form that a skewness value (Rsk) of the roughness curve in the height direction mainly indicates a positive value, and that the ceramic spray coating is an oxide ceramic spray coating made from Al2O3, Y2O3 or a composite oxide of Al2O3—Y2O3, and that the ceramic spray coating has a thickness of 50-2000 μm, and that the electron beam irradiated layer is a layer changing a crystal structure of ceramic particles in the spray coating.
Since the spray coated member according to the invention does not form a source of generating particles as a cause of an environment contamination because it is excellent in the resistance to plasma erosion. Also, it is excellent in not only the characteristic of detoxifying by adsorbing a greater amount of particles on the surface of the coating to increase the deposition amount, but also the action of preventing the rescattering of the adhered and deposited particles.
Further, by adopting the member according to the invention can be enhanced the processing accuracy in the semiconductor processed products under severely corrosive environment requiring the high environmental cleanness and containing a halogen compound. Moreover, the use of such a member is made possible to conduct the continuous operation over a long time of period and to improve the quality of the precisely processed semiconductor product and reduce the cost of the product.
The invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
As a preferred embodiment of the invention, there is described an example of forming a ceramic spray coating (an example of “oxide ceramic” is described hereinafter) on a surface of a member in an apparatus used in a process such as a thin film forming process, a plasma etching process or the like.
(1) Formation of Oxide Ceramic Spray Coating
An oxide ceramic spray coating made from Al2O3, Y2O3 or a composite oxide of Al2O3—Y2O3 is directly formed on a surface of a substrate or on a metallic undercoat formed on the surface of the substrate at a thickness of 50-2000 μm as a top coat. When the thickness of the spray coating is less than 50 μm, the service life as the top coat becomes short, while when it exceeds 2000 μm, residual stress resulted from thermal shrinkage in the formation of the spray coating becomes large and the shock resistance of the coating and the adhesion force to the substrate lower.
The spray powder material used in the formation of the oxide ceramic spray coating is preferable to have a particle size of 5-80 μm. When the particle size is less than 5 μm, the continuous and uniform supply to a spraying gun is difficult and the thickness of the coating becomes easily non-uniform, while when it exceeds 80 μm, the material is not completely fused in a spraying heat source and the coating is formed at a so-called non-fused state and it is difficult to form the dense spray coating.
The metallic undercoat formed on the surface of the substrate prior to the formation of the top coat made of the oxide ceramic spray coating is preferable to be made of Ni and an alloy thereof, Mo and an alloy thereof, Al and an alloy thereof, Mg or the like. The undercoat is preferable to have a thickness of 50-500 μm. When the thickness is less than 50 μm, the protection of the substrate is insufficient, while when it exceeds 500 μm, the action and effect as the undercoat are saturated and the use of such an undercoat is uneconomical.
As the substrate are used Al and Al alloy, Ti and Ti alloy, stainless steel, Ni-based alloy, quartz, glass, plastics (high polymer materials), sintered member (oxide, carbide, boride, silicide, nitride and a mixture thereof), and a plated film or deposited film formed on the surface of such a substrate.
In the invention, the reason why Al2O3, Y2O3 or the composite oxide of Al2O3—Y2O3 is sprayed on the surface of the substrate as the oxide ceramic spray coating (top coat) is due to the fact that these oxide ceramics are excellent in the corrosion resistance and the resistance to plasma erosion as compared with the other oxide ceramics such as TiO2, MgO, ZrO2, NiO2, Cr2O3 and the like.
It is preferable to form the top coat or the undercoat on the surface of the substrate by adopting an atmospheric plasma spraying process, a low pressure plasma spraying process, a water plasma spraying process, high-speed and low-speed flame spraying processes or an detonation spraying process.
(2) Surface Form of Oxide Ceramic Spray Coating (Optimum Roughness)
In the invention, the oxide ceramic spray coating directly formed on the surface of the substrate or formed on the metallic undercoat is has a surface form, i.e. a surface roughness, particularly a roughness curve in a height direction as mentioned below.
In general, the jig or constituent used in the semiconductor apparatus, for example, the plasma treating apparatus is used to have a large surface area. Because, the environment contaminating substances such as thin film forming particles, particles generated in the treating atmosphere through plasma etching and the like are adhered (adsorbed) onto the surfaces of the constituents as large as possible and at the same time the deposited state is maintained over a long time of period and also the rescattering of the adhered and deposited environment contaminating substance from the surface of the substrate is prevented.
In the invention, considering the above object, the surface form of the spray coating formed on the surface of the substrate as a top coat is specified as a skewness value (Rsk) of a roughness curve indicating a distortion in a direction of the coating thickness (height) as to a surface roughness curve of the coating. That is, by rendering the surface form into a roughened surface showing a positive value of the skewness (Rsk) is intended the increase of the adhesion and deposited amount of the environment contaminates (including particles generated in the plasma etching) and the rescattering thereof is prevented so as not to deteriorate the quality of the semiconductor processed product.
In the invention, the skewness value (Rsk) defined in geometric characteristic specification, surface properties: profile curve system, term-definition and surface parameters according to JIB B0601 (2001) is noticed as a means for specifying the surface form of the oxide ceramic spray coating.
As shown in
On the other hand, when the skewness value is a negative value, as shown in
Moreover, RsK is defined by dividing third power average of height (Z(x)) at a standard length (lr) by third power of second average root (Rq3) as shown by the following equation:
As disclosed in JP-A-2004-52281, when the surface roughness is Rsk<0, the area of the concave portion adhered and deposited with the thin film forming particles, particles and the like generated as a cause of environment contamination by the plasma etching phenomenon is small but also the distance between the valley portions is narrow, so that if the particles having a slightly larger size and the like cover the surfaces of such valley portions, the efficiency of housing the particles considerably lowers and the rescattering of the particles becomes easy.
On the contrary, when the skewness value is Rsk>0 as in the invention, as shown in
Moreover, it is desirable that a ratio of indicating the positive value as the skewness value (Rsk) is not less than 80% for obtaining the above-mentioned action and effects. As a ratio of indicating the negative value becomes large, the adhesion and deposition amount of the thin film forming particles or the particles becomes less. Moreover, the control of the skewness value is carried out by controlling the particle size of the spraying powder material or controlling the spraying conditions, for example, by concretely using a mixed gas of Ar and H2 as a plasma gas and a spraying angle to the substrate of 90-55°, whereby there is obtained a stable coating having the above surface form.
Further explaining in detail, the spray coating having the above surface form, i.e. the coating having a roughened surface with a given roughness curve is obtained by continuously supplying ceramic powder having a particle size of 5-80 μm at a unit of several tens of thousands particles to a heat source. In this case, all spraying powder material is located in a central portion of a high-temperature heat source (in flame) but also may be distributed in a surrounding portion of the heat source having a relatively low temperature (outside flame). Also, even if the spraying powder particles fly in the central portion of the heat source, there is produced a difference in the degree of heating fusion in accordance with the small and large particle sizes. Since the spray coating is constituted with ceramic particles having different heat histories and particle sizes, particles having different flatness are randomly deposited. As a result, the surface roughness of the spray coating is defined by the deposition of unequal particles. Therefore, when the oxide ceramic spraying powder material having a particle size of 5-80 is sprayed as a spraying powder material under predetermined spraying conditions, the skewness value of the above roughness curve can be controlled so as to mainly indicate the positive value (≧80%).
In the surface roughness of the above spray coating surface represented by Rsk>0, as shown in
When the electron beam is irradiated to the surface of the oxide ceramic spray coating, the rescattering of the particles causing the contamination in the atmosphere can be suppressed without lowering the adhesion and deposition volumes of the particles, whereby the spray coating itself shows a good resistance to plasma erosion. Therefore, the spray coating irradiated to the electron beam solves the drawbacks of the conventional techniques bringing about the source of generating the environment contaminating particles.
When the spray coating having a surface form of Rsk>0 shown in
Namely, the surface of the spray coating is subjected to the irradiation of the electron beam, only the needle-like convex portions with the surface form having Rsk>0 as a skewness value of a roughness curve are fused to change into the trapezoidal form, whereby the formation and scattering of the fine particles as a cause of environment contamination under an action of plasma erosion can be prevented. On the other hand, the form of the concave portions below the center line can be maintained as it is. Moreover, when the electron beam is irradiated so as to extend below the center line of the surface roughness curve, the concave portions suitable for adhering and depositing the great amount of the particles are fused and hence the whole of the coating becomes flat and smooth, and as a result, the unevenness inherent to the spray coating can not be utilized effectively.
Among the surfaces of the spray coating, the concave form appearing below the center line is not influenced even in the portions indicating Rsk<0 as a skewness value of the roughness curve, so that the electron beam is irradiated only to the portions inclusive of round convex portions located above the center line of the roughness curve in the height direction. In this case, the same effect as in the case of the coating having a form of Rsk>0, but the convex portions above the center line are fused and solidified by the irradiation of the electron beam and changed into a different crystal form, and hence the occurrence of particles from the oxide ceramic spray coating in the irradiation of the electron beam can be suppressed.
Also, when the electron beam is irradiated to the surface of the oxide ceramic spray coating, the crystal structure of the oxide ceramic, i.e. Al2O3, Y2O3 or composite oxide of Al2O3—Y2O3 can be changed to improve the resistance to plasma erosion as compared with the coating prior to the electron beam irradiation. This effect supplements the problem that the spray coating itself becomes a source of generating the environment contaminating particles under the action of the plasma erosion.
When the electron beam is irradiated onto the surface of the oxide ceramic spray coating, the crystal structure of the coating component changes into a more stabilizing direction as a result of the inventors' knowledge. That is, in case of Al2O3, the crystal structure of the coating after the spraying is γ-phase, but changes into α-phase after the irradiation of the electron beam. The crystal structure of Y2O3 changes from a cubic crystal through a monoclinic crystal to a cubic crystal, while the crystal structure of the Al2O3—Y2O3 composite oxide changes so as to possess the above changes of Al2O3 and Y2O3 with each other. In any changes, the resistance to plasma erosion is improved.
Moreover, as a method of fusing a portion of the spray coating located above the center line of the skewness value Rsk for changing the needle-like convex portion having the predetermined skewness value (Rsk) into the trapezoidal convex portion, it is recommended that the irradiation power and irradiation number as an irradiation condition of the electron beam are controlled within the following range in accordance with the thickness of the spray coating (50-2000 μm):
As another method adopting irradiation conditions other than the above conditions, an electron beam is generated by an electron gun or the irradiation atmosphere is made under a reduced pressure or in an inert gas of a reduced pressure, whereby it is possible to finely adjust the irradiated layer.
In the invention, the meaning and merits of subjecting the surface of the oxide ceramic spray coating to the irradiation of the electron beam are mentioned as follows:
(a) As the oxide ceramic spray coating, in addition to Al2O3, Y2O3 or the composite oxide of Al2O3—Y2O3, the other ceramic coatings such as 3Al2O3-2SiO2, ZrO2, Cr2O3 and the like can be utilized, so that the application is considerably wider.
(b) The electron beam irradiation is carried out to the convex portions of the roughness curve irrespectively of the form of the roughness curve (skewness value) in the height direction of the surface of the spray coating, so that the physical and chemical properties of the coating as a whole are not influenced.
(c) The convex portion on the surface of the spray coating irradiated by the electron beam is changed from the sharp needle-like form into the round trapezoidal form by local fusion-solidification reaction, so that it is hardly affected by the action of plasma etching. Also, the crystal structure is changed into a more stable structure, so that the convex portion can be modified and the service life can be prolonged in view of the crystal structure level.
(d) Since the portion irradiated by the electron beam is limited to only the convex portions in the outermost surface layer of the spray coating, the characteristics of the form in the concave portions below the center line of the roughness curve, concretely the form capable of depositing a great amount of environment contaminating particles as in the concave form of the roughness curve represented by Rsk>0 can be maintained as they are.
(e) In the convex portions on the surface of the spray coating irradiated by the electron beam, the resistance to plasma erosion is improved by the effects such as the change of crystal structure through the fusion-solidification reaction and the like. Also, they do not form a source of generating particles as a cause of environment contamination, so that the precise processing operation of the semiconductor can be smoothly conducted while maintaining a higher environmental cleanness.
In this example, a coating of Al2O3, Y2O3 or Al2O3—Y2O3 composite oxide is directly formed on a surface of SUS304 substrate (40 mm in width×50 mm in length×7 mm in thickness) at a thickness of 120 μm by a plasma spraying process, and thereafter the surface thereof is subjected to the measurement of skewness value in the height direction of the coating surface by means of a roughness measuring meter of SURFCOM 1400D-13 (made by Tokyo Seimitsu Co., Ltd.) to distinct into coating of Rsk>0 and coating of Rsk<0. These coatings are subjected to or not to an irradiation of an electron beam to prepare test specimens.
With respect to these test specimens, the following items are examined by means of a reactive plasma etching apparatus having a plasma irradiating power of 80 W.
(1) Resistance to Plasma Etching
The surface of the test specimen is etched by flowing a mixed gas of CF4 gas (60 ml/min) and O2 gas (2 ml/min) into the plasma etching apparatus for 800 minutes, and thereafter observed by means of an electron microscope to evaluate the resistance to plasma etching.
(2) Deposition State of Particles
As a source of generating environment contaminating particles, there is separately provided a SiO2 spray coating to be easily plasma-etched. This coating is regarded as environment contaminating particles by plasma etching and placed in the plasma etching apparatus. The state of adhering and depositing these particles on the test specimen is observed by means of an electron microscope.
(3) Rescattering of Environment Contaminating Particles
The test specimen after the above test (2) is heated in an argon gas (Ar) atmosphere at 300° C. for 15 minutes and cooled to room temperature. After this operation is repeated 10 times, the surface of the test specimen is observed by means of an electron microscope to examine the remaining state of the adhered particles.
The results are summarized in Table 1. As to the resistance to plasma etching, all coatings of Al2O3, Y2O3 and Al2O3—Y2O3 composite oxide irradiated by the electron beam develop a good resistance to plasma etching as compared with the non-irradiated coatings without relation to the case that the form of the surface roughness curve is Rsk>0 or Rsk<0. Concretely, Y2O3 coating of Rsk>0 (No. 6) and Y2O3 coating (No. 8), Al2O3—Y2O3 composite oxide coating (Nos. 10 and 12) of Rsk<0, which are not subjected to the electron beam irradiation, develop fairly good resistance to plasma etching as compared with Al2O3 coating. However, when the electron beam is irradiated to these coatings, the more improvement of the resistance to plasma etching is obtained.
Viewing the deposition state of particles, the coating of Rsk>0 having a sharp convex form of the roughness curve and a large concave volume is recognized to have a great amount of particles deposited irrespectively of the kind of the coating material, which is considered that the effect of the coating surface form is a most important factor. However, the effect of depositing the particles is recognized even in the irradiation of the electron beam (Nos. 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11), so that when the degree of rescattering the particles adhered and deposited on the surface of the test specimen is examined by the behavior of expansion and shrinkage in the substrate metal and the oxide ceramic coating accompanied with the change of the environment temperature, it has been confirmed that the coating of Rsk>0 as a skewness value of the roughness curve of the coating surface is less in the rescattering but the tendency of the rescattering is large in the coating of Rsk<0 irrespectively of the presence or absence of the electron beam irradiation. The reason why the effect of rescattering the particles is low even when the coating of Rsk>0 is irradiated by the electron beam (Nos. 1, 5, 9) is considered due to the fact that the electron beam is irradiated to only the convex portions of the roughness curve and does not affect the concave form having a large deposition volume of the particles.
As seen from the above results, the effect of the electron beam irradiation is recognized on both of Rsk>0 and Rsk<0 in the form of the roughness curve on the surface of the oxide ceramic spray coating though there is a some difference, from which it is thought that the coating of Al2O3, Y2O3 or Al2O3—Y2O3 composite oxide improves the resistance to plasma erosion through the electron beam irradiation and can solve the drawback of forming the source of generating particles.
In this example, an undercoat of 80 mass % Ni-20 mass % Cr is formed on a surface of Al substrate (30 mm in width×50 mm in length×5 mm in thickness) at a thickness of 80 μm and a coating of Al2O3, Y2O3 or Al2O3—Y2O3 composite oxide is formed thereon at a thickness of 250 μm through a plasma spraying process, respectively. Thereafter, Rsk value of roughness curve on the surface of the spray coating is measured by means of the aforementioned roughness meter to distinct Rsk>0 and Rsk<0, which are subjected to an irradiation of electron beam.
These spray coating specimens are subjected to plasma etching under the following conditions, the number of particles scatted by the etching action is compared with the number of particles adhered on a surface of a silicon wafer having a diameter of 3 inches arranged in the same apparatus. Moreover, the number of the adhered particles is examined by a surface inspection apparatus (magnifying glass), in which particle size of not less than about 0.2 μm is targeted.
(1) Atmosphere Gas Condition
CHF3 80:O2 100:Ar 160 (numeral is a flow rate cm3 per 1 minute)
(2) Plasma Irradiation Power
In this experiment, the coating not irradiated by the electron beam and oxide ceramic coatings of TiO2 and 8 mass % Y2O3-92 mass % ZrO2 as a comparative example are tested under the same conditions.
The experimental results are shown in Table 2. As seen from these results, TiO2 (No. 14) and 8 mass % Y2O3-92 mass % ZrO2 (No. 18) as the comparative example exceed the control value of 30 particles in the plasma irradiation test of 1.8 hours and 3.2 hours, respectively, and are poor in the resistance to plasma erosion. On the contrary, the coating of Al2O3, Y2O3 or Al2O3—Y2O3 composite oxide suitable for the invention develops the excellent resistance to plasma erosion as compared with the coatings of the comparative example. Particularly, the coatings irradiated by the electron beam (Nos. 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11) show a more excellent resistance to plasma erosion as compared with the coatings not irradiated by the electron beam (Nos. 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12).
As seen from the above results, the electron beam irradiation is particularly effective for the spray coatings having a certain resistance to plasma erosion at a sprayed state, and is an effective treatment not largely exerting on the form (Rsk>0, Rsk<0) of the roughness curve on the surface of the coating.
In this example, all test specimens used in the test of Example 2 for the resistance to plasma erosion are subjected to a thermal shock test. That is, the test specimen of the spray coating used in the test of Example 2 was subjected to the plasma erosion test under a corrosive environment containing a halogen gas, during which the corrosive halogen gas penetrated through pores of the top coat into the interior of the coating and may corrode the undercoat to easily peel off the top coat.
In the thermal shock test, the test specimen is heated in an electric furnace of 300° C. for 15 minutes and thereafter cooled in air of 24° C. for 20 minutes, and such an operation is repeated 10 times. Thereafter, the change of the top coat is visually observed. As a result, it has been confirmed that all test specimens shown in Table 2 hold a good resistance to thermal shock without causing the cracking of the top coat and the peeling of the coating.
The invention is applicable as a member used in a technical filed of semiconductor processing apparatus, thin film forming apparatus or the like such as members for vacuum vessel used in vacuum deposition, ion plating, sputtering, chemical deposition, laser precision processing, plasma sputtering and the like.
Since this invention is excellent about the action of preventing the adhesion and the deposition of particles and about the action of inhibiting the rescattering, it is possible to use in the field of the member for the semiconductor processing and also the field of the one of the members for precision processing and the structural member thereof (the wall at the working chamber) and the like.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2005-260294 | Sep 2005 | JP | national |
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/469,051, filed Aug. 31, 2006, the contents of which are expressly incorporated by reference in its entirety, which claims priority to Japanese Application No. JP 2005-260294, filed Sep. 8, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3663793 | Petro et al. | May 1972 | A |
3990860 | Fletcher et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4000247 | Yamada et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4205051 | Takahashi et al. | May 1980 | A |
4219359 | Miwa et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4536228 | Treharne | Aug 1985 | A |
4997809 | Gupta | Mar 1991 | A |
5004712 | Borglum | Apr 1991 | A |
5024992 | Morris | Jun 1991 | A |
5032248 | Kanamaru et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5057335 | Hanagata et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5093148 | Christodoulou et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5128316 | Agostinelli et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5180322 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5206059 | Marantz | Apr 1993 | A |
5316859 | Harada et al. | May 1994 | A |
5366585 | Robertson et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5397650 | Harada et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5427823 | Varshney et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5432151 | Russo et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5472793 | Harada et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5562840 | Swain et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5909354 | Harada et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922275 | Kageyama et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6010966 | Ionov | Jan 2000 | A |
6045665 | Ohhashi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6120640 | Shih et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132890 | Harada et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6180259 | Harada et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6250251 | Akiyama et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261962 | Bhardwaj et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265250 | Yu | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6306489 | Hellmann et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319419 | Ohhashi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326063 | Harada et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6383964 | Nakahara et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6447853 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451647 | Yang et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6509070 | Voevodin et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6547921 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558505 | Suzuki et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6576354 | Tsukatani et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6586348 | Hartner et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6641941 | Yamada et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6733843 | Tsukatani et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6738863 | Butterworth et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6771483 | Harada et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6777045 | Lin et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783863 | Harada et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6797957 | Kawakubo et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805968 | Saito et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6834613 | Miyazaki et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6852433 | Maeda | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6884516 | Harada et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6916534 | Wataya et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7494723 | Harada et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7497598 | Masaki et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7648782 | Kobayashi et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7767268 | Harada et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7850864 | Kobayashi | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20020018902 | Tsukatani et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020177014 | Kaneyoshi et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020192429 | Takai et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040061431 | Takeuchi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040214026 | Harada et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216667 | Mitsuhashi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050103275 | Sasaki et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050106869 | Ooyabu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050136188 | Chang | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147852 | Harada et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060099444 | Moriya et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060099457 | Moriya et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060121293 | Boutwel et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060183344 | Escher et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070026246 | Harada et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070054092 | Harada et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070166477 | Chang | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070215283 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070218302 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090120358 | Harada et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090130436 | Harada et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090208667 | Harada et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100068395 | Moriya et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2001-164354 | Jun 2001 | AU |
0 822 584 | Feb 1998 | EP |
1 156 130 | Nov 2001 | EP |
50-075370 | Jun 1975 | JP |
50-75370 | Jun 1975 | JP |
58-192661 | Nov 1983 | JP |
58-202535 | Nov 1983 | JP |
59-96273 | Jun 1984 | JP |
61-30658 | Feb 1986 | JP |
61-030658 | Feb 1986 | JP |
61-104062 | May 1986 | JP |
61-113755 | May 1986 | JP |
61104062 | May 1986 | JP |
62-253758 | Nov 1987 | JP |
64-039728 | Feb 1989 | JP |
01-139749 | Jun 1989 | JP |
1-139749 | Jun 1989 | JP |
3-115535 | May 1991 | JP |
3-247769 | Nov 1991 | JP |
4-202660 | Jul 1992 | JP |
4-276059 | Oct 1992 | JP |
05-117064 | May 1993 | JP |
5-117064 | May 1993 | JP |
05-238859 | Sep 1993 | JP |
5-238859 | Sep 1993 | JP |
6-057396 | Mar 1994 | JP |
06-057396 | Mar 1994 | JP |
6-136505 | May 1994 | JP |
06-136505 | May 1994 | JP |
06-142822 | May 1994 | JP |
06-196421 | Jul 1994 | JP |
6-196421 | Jul 1994 | JP |
6-220618 | Aug 1994 | JP |
7-35568 | Apr 1995 | JP |
7-035568 | Apr 1995 | JP |
7-102366 | Apr 1995 | JP |
07-126827 | May 1995 | JP |
07-176524 | Jul 1995 | JP |
7-176524 | Jul 1995 | JP |
08-037180 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8-037180 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8-339895 | Dec 1996 | JP |
08-339895 | Dec 1996 | JP |
9-048684 | Feb 1997 | JP |
09-048684 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9-67632 | Mar 1997 | JP |
09-069554 | Mar 1997 | JP |
9-069554 | Mar 1997 | JP |
9-216075 | Aug 1997 | JP |
09-216075 | Aug 1997 | JP |
09-272987 | Oct 1997 | JP |
9-316624 | Dec 1997 | JP |
09-316624 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10-004083 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10-045461 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10-045467 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10-144654 | May 1998 | JP |
10-163180 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-202782 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-226869 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-330971 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11-080925 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-207161 | Aug 1999 | JP |
11-345780 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2000-54802 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-72529 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000-072529 | Mar 2000 | JP |
3076768 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000-191370 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000-228398 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001-031484 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-164354 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001164354 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001-335915 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2001-342553 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002-80954 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-080954 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-89607 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-089607 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2003-95649 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-095649 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-264169 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003-321760 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-003022 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-010981 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-149915 | May 2004 | JP |
2004-190136 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-522281 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-269951 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005-256098 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006-118053 | May 2006 | JP |
2007-516921 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007-314886 | Dec 2007 | JP |
10-0248081 | Apr 2000 | KR |
10-0268052 | Oct 2000 | KR |
2002-3367 | Jan 2002 | KR |
10-2007-0030718 | Mar 2007 | KR |
2007-30718 | Mar 2007 | KR |
0142526 | Jun 2001 | WO |
03003404 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2004095532 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005-062758 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2007013184 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007023971 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007023976 | Mar 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100203288 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11469051 | Aug 2006 | US |
Child | 12758940 | US |