Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6327974
-
Patent Number
6,327,974
-
Date Filed
Monday, March 1, 199926 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, December 11, 200124 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
- Hilten; John S.
- Grohusky; Leslie J.
Agents
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 101 147
- 101 148
- 101 366
- 101 365
- 101 3518
- 101 484
- 239 551
- 239 556
- 239 563
- 239 70
- 118 300
- 118 313
- 118 314
- 118 315
- 118 259
- 118 696
- 118 699
- 118 702
- 118 704
- 427 421
-
International Classifications
- B41F730
- B41F3316
- B41L2506
-
Abstract
A spray dampening device for a printing apparatus, the spray dampening device comprising a plurality of spray nozzles. The spray nozzles are each cycled at a predetermined frequency and at an individual nozzle phase shift with the individual phase shifts being synchronized so that an effective frequency of spray bursts applied to target surface of the printing apparatus is greater than the predetermined frequency. Dampening system performance may be improved without the implementation of new individual nozzle technology. The benefits of a pulsed dampener system are maintained while system performance approaches that of a continuous dampener.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to printing machines and more particularly to a spray dampening system for a printing press.
RELATED TECHNOLOGY
In modern printing processes, including offset lithographic processes, a wetting solution and ink are applied to certain rollers of a printing press. The ink is subsequently transferred to a printed medium, such as paper. The wetting solution is applied in sufficient quantities to the rollers to facilitate the printing process and aid in proper application of the ink to the paper. The wetting solution, which is typically a water-based solution which repels the ink, adheres to blank portions of an image plate and helps prevent the application of ink to the blank areas.
Control of the amount and distribution of the applied wetting solution is critical. Insufficient wetting tends to encourage the ink to migrate to improper portions of the plate and thereby be transferred to corresponding areas of the paper which are not to be printed. Excess wetting results in waste which must be collected and removed from the system, and may even cause wetting of the paper to be printed. A smooth, even application of the wetting solution without excess is desirable.
Spray dampening systems, such as that described in Switall et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,649,818, have been developed which employ solenoid-operated spray nozzles to apply the wetting fluid to a roller. The spray nozzles are typically arranged on a spray bar. Such spray dampening systems meter wetting fluid flow rates by cycling the solenoid-operated spray nozzles at various frequencies and duty cycles. The resulting periodic, non-continuous application of wetting solution to a roller results in periodic variations in the distribution of wetting solution on the roller. If the variations are too large, defects in the printed product may occur.
Two approaches have been attempted with prior dampening systems to reduce variations in the distribution of wetting solution on a roller. One approach increases the frequency of cycling of the spray nozzles to more closely approximate a continuous application of wetting solution to a roller. However, improvements achievable with this approach are limited, as it is difficult and expensive to increase the spray nozzle cycling frequency. This upper limit exists due to current nozzle technology and physical limitations. Also, higher spray nozzle cycling frequencies can lead to problems such as “misting” of wetting solution, resulting in its deposition in unwanted areas of the image plate. A second approach is to design and employ a dampener roll which filters out variations in the applied spray, producing a more continuous, uniform distribution of wetting solution. This approach may require unwieldy dampener rolls which are both difficult to package and prohibitively expensive.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a spray dampening device for a printing apparatus, the spray dampening device comprising a plurality of spray nozzles for applying spray bursts to a surface of a target of the printing apparatus. Each of the spray nozzles is cycled at a predetermined frequency and at an individual nozzle phase shift, the individual nozzle phase shifts being synchronized so that an effective frequency of spray bursts applied to the surface is greater than the predetermined frequency.
The present invention also provides method for spray dampening a printing device, the method comprising spraying a dampening solution in spray bursts through a plurality of spray nozzles to a surface of a target apparatus, and cycling each of the spray nozzles at a predetermined frequency and at an individual nozzle phase shift. The individual phase shifts are synchronized so that an effective frequency of spray bursts applied to the surface is greater than the predetermined frequency.
The present invention thus may provide increased effective dampening spray burst frequencies beyond limits approached by individual nozzles. Dampening system performance may be improved without the implementation of new individual nozzle technology. The benefits of a pulsed dampener system may be maintained while system performance approaches that of a continuous dampener.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In the following, the present invention is explained in more detail with the aid of the drawings, in which:
FIG. 1A
shows a perspective view of a prior art spray dampening device;
FIG. 1B
shows a side cross-sectional schematic view of the prior art spray dampening device of
FIG. 1A
;
FIG. 1C
shows a schematic view of the spray nozzle arrangement of the prior art spray dampening device shown in
FIG. 1A
;
FIG. 2A
shows a perspective view of an embodiment of a spray dampening device according to the present invention;
FIG. 2B
shows a cross-sectional schematic view of the spray dampening device of
FIG. 2A
;
FIG. 2C
shows a schematic view of the spray nozzle arrangement of the spray dampening device shown in
FIG. 2A
;
FIG. 3A
shows a schematic unwrapped, flattened view of a portion of the surface of the roller of the prior art spray dampening device shown in
FIG. 1A
, for demonstrating the spray coverage of the device;
FIG. 3B
shows a schematic unwrapped, flattened view of a portion of the surface of the roller of the spray dampening device according to the present invention shown in
FIG. 2A
, for demonstrating the spray coverage of the device;
FIG. 4
shows a schematic view of the spray nozzle arrangement of another embodiment of the spray dampening device according to the present invention having an array of staggered spray nozzles;
FIG. 5A
shows a schematic view of the spray nozzle arrangement of another embodiment of the spray dampening device according to the present invention having grouped spray nozzles; and
FIG. 5B
shows a schematic view of the spray nozzle arrangement of another embodiment of the spray dampening device according to the present invention having three rows of grouped spray nozzles.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
To better understand the present invention, which is shown in
FIGS. 2A
,
2
B and
2
C, a prior art spray dampening device is described in
FIGS. 1A
,
1
B and
1
C. The spray dampening device is a part of a printing apparatus.
FIG. 1A
shows a perspective view of a prior art spray dampening device having spray bar
2
, spray nozzles
4
, and generally cylindrical roller
6
. Roller
6
rotates about longitudinal axis
5
. Pressurized wetting solution fed through spray bar
2
is applied via spray
8
to moving surface
7
of roller
6
by pulse-cycling spray nozzles
4
open and closed. The spray nozzles are typically cycled all at the same time at a common frequency, which may be varied based on a various parameters, such as the speed of the printing apparatus.
FIG. 1B
provides a side cross-sectional schematic view of the prior art spray dampening device shown in FIG.
1
A. As shown in the schematic view of
FIG. 1C
, as well as in
FIGS. 1A and 1B
, the spray nozzles of the prior art spray dampening device are arranged in a row generally parallel to longitudinal axis
5
of roller
6
.
FIGS. 2A
,
2
B and
2
C depict an embodiment of a spray dampening device according to the present invention. Three spray bars
20
a
,
20
b
and
20
c
are provided with spray nozzle sets
40
a
,
40
b
and
40
c
, respectively, the spray nozzles being arranged in a row on each of their respective spray bars. The spray nozzles deposit sprays
80
of wetting solution onto moving surface
62
of generally cylindrical roller
60
as the roller rotates about longitudinal axis
64
. The spray bars are arranged above surface
62
so that the spray nozzles form a rectangular array of M×N nozzles, M being the number of rows and N being the number of columns of nozzles, as shown in FIG.
2
C. In the embodiment depicted, M is equal to three and N equal to eight.
As embodied herein, the spray nozzle sets
40
a
,
40
b
and
40
c
are pulse-activated, i.e., cycled open and shut, at a predetermined frequency f. As embodied herein, the nozzles are synchronized to alternately cycle as follows:
The cycling of nozzle set
40
b
is phase-shifted to cycle later relative nozzle set
40
a
, while the cycling of nozzle set
40
c
is phase-shifted to cycle later relative to nozzle set
40
b
. The phase shifts are established so that nozzle set
40
a
sprays a burst of wetting solution against the moving surface
62
of roller
60
at a time t
a
. Then at time t
b
, a predetermined phase shift, or time delay, later, nozzle set
40
b
sprays a burst of wetting solution against surface
62
. Similarly, nozzle set
40
c
then sprays a burst of wetting solution against surface
62
at a time t
c
, which is a predetermined phase shift from the cycling of nozzle set
40
b
. The nozzle sets thus spray in sequence, one after the other, starting with nozzle set
40
a
. The sequence preferably continues in a cyclic manner—
40
a
,
40
b
,
40
c
,
40
a
,
40
b
,
40
c
, etc. The phase shift between nozzle sets
40
a
and
40
b
is preferably the same as the phase shift between nozzle sets
40
b
and
40
c
so that the time delay between the cycling of each set of spray nozzles is the same. Also, the amount of time the nozzles of each nozzle set are open and closed is preferably the same for all nozzles, so that the duty cycle is the same for all the nozzles.
Reference may now to had to
FIGS. 3A and 3B
, with which the effect of the synchronized, phase-shifted cycling of the spray nozzle sets according to the present invention may be conveniently demonstrated.
FIG. 3A
shows a schematic unwrapped, flattened view of a portion of the surface
7
of roller
6
of the prior art spray dampening device shown in
FIGS. 1A
,
1
B and
1
C, and discussed above. Spray areas
9
represent, in simplified form, the wetting solution coverage of surface
7
due to individual, sequential bursts of spray from spray nozzle
4
as surface
7
moves pasts nozzle
4
in a direction D due to the rotation of roller
6
. X
A
, as shown, represents the pulse, or cycling, period of nozzle
4
. X
A
is a function of both the nozzle cycling frequency and the surface (tangential) velocity of surface
7
. Spray area length Y
A
and dry length Z
A
are functions of the nozzle duty cycle and the surface velocity of surface
7
.
FIG. 3B
shows a schematic unwrapped, flattened view of a portion of surface
62
of roller
60
of the embodiment of the spray dampening device according to the present invention shown in
FIGS. 2A
,
2
B and
2
C, and discussed above. Three spray nozzles
40
a
,
40
b
and
40
c
are shown, which represent one column of the M×N nozzle array shown in FIG.
2
C. Spray areas
90
a
,
90
b
and
90
c
represent, in simplified form, the wetting solution coverage of surface
62
due to individual, sequential bursts of spray from spray nozzle
40
a
,
40
b
and
40
c
as surface
62
moves pasts the nozzles in direction D due to the rotation of roller
60
. Nozzles
40
a
,
40
b
and
40
c
are cycled, or pulsed, open and closed in a phase-shifted, sequential synchronized cyclic fashion, as described above. As embodied herein, the nozzle cycling frequency f of an individual nozzle is the same for all three nozzles
40
a
,
40
b
and
40
c
. X
B
represents the cycling period of one nozzle. Y
B
and Z
B
represent the spray area length and dry length, respectively, applied to surface
62
. When the nozzle cycling frequency f is equal to the cycling frequency of the prior art spray dampener device shown in FIG.
3
A and the surface (tangential) velocity of surface
62
is equal to the surface velocity of surface
7
of the prior art spray dampener device shown in
FIG. 3A
, cycling period X
B
equals X
A
, the cycle period of the prior art spray dampener device shown in FIG.
3
A. As embodied herein, the cycling time of nozzles
40
a
,
40
b
and
40
c
is set so that spray area length Y
B
is equal to one third of Y
A
, the spray length of the prior art spray dampener device shown in
FIG. 3A
, and the dry distance Z
B
is equal to one third of Z
A
, the dry distance of the prior art spray dampener device shown in FIG.
3
A.
As is apparent from
FIGS. 3A and 3B
, the spray dampening device of the present invention advantageously enables three spray bursts to be applied to the roller
60
in the same period (X
B
=X
A
) as one spray burst is applied in the prior art device. The effective spray frequency applied to the roller is thus three times that of the prior art device. In other embodiments, the spray dampening device of the present invention may be provided with other numbers of spray bars
20
, and, consequently, of rows M of spray nozzles. In general, when M rows of nozzles are used, with synchronized, phase-shifted cycling, as described above, the present invention advantageously provides an effective spray frequency applied to surface
62
of M times the cycle frequency of an individual spray nozzle.
FIG. 4
shows an alternate embodiment of the present invention in which the M×N array of spray nozzles
40
is configured in a staggered arrangement, the nozzles on spray bar
20
b
being shifted laterally relative to the spray nozzles of spray bars
20
a
and
20
c
. The staggered arrangement shown provides a corresponding staggered spray pattern on the surface
62
of roller
60
.
FIG. 5A
shows an embodiment of the present invention in which spray nozzles are arranged in lateral groups
41
on a spray bar
20
, each group having, for example, three spray nozzles
41
d
,
41
e
and
41
f
. The three nozzles in a group are oriented to spray all at the same general area on surface
62
of roller
60
. As embodied herein, the three nozzles in each group cycle in a phase-shifted, sequential manner. In a group
41
, nozzle
41
d
cycles open and shut, followed by the cycling of nozzle
41
e
a predetermined time delay later. Then nozzle
41
f
cycles with the same time delay after nozzle
41
e
. Preferably the three nozzles in the other groups
41
are synchronized to cycle in the same time delay pattern, and at the same times, i.e., with the same frequency. In other embodiments of the present invention, varying phase shift patterns and nozzle cycling frequencies may be employed. Each spray nozzle group of a spray dampening device in accordance with this embodiment of the present invention will produce a spray coverage pattern on surface
62
similar to that shown in
FIG. 3B
, while the nozzles occupy less space.
Referring now to
FIG. 5B
, in another embodiment of the invention, several spray bars
20
having groups
41
of three nozzles
41
d
,
41
e
and
41
f
, as in the embodiment shown in
FIG. 5A
, may be arranged to form an M×N rectangular array of M rows and N columns of nozzle groups. An exemplary embodiment having
3
rows a, b, c of spray bars
20
a
,
20
b
and
20
c
, respectively, is depicted in FIG.
5
B. In a spray bar
20
a
,
20
b
or
20
c
, the nozzles in each group preferably cycle with a time delay pattern synchronized with corresponding nozzles in other groups, as described above with respect to the single spray bar
20
shown in FIG.
5
A. As embodied herein, the cycling of nozzle rows a, b and c are phase-shifted relative to each other so that nozzles on spray bar
20
b
are synchronized to cycle with a predetermined time delay after the corresponding nozzles on spray bar
20
a
, and nozzles on spray bar
20
c
are synchronized to cycle with a predetermined time delay after the corresponding nozzles on spray bar
20
b
. Preferably, the time delays between the nozzle bars are the same. In other embodiments of the present invention cycling phase shifts may be applied on a nozzle group column basis, so that the nozzle groups in individual columns of the M×N array nozzle are phase shifted relative to other columns in the array. In this way, a two-dimensional phase shift scheme may be applied to the nozzle array.
While the present invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, various alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the preferred embodiments of the present invention set forth herein are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined in the claims. For example, various nozzle array configurations, such as trapezoidal-shaped, for example, or combinations of nozzle groups in a regular or irregular geometric configurations with various numbers of nozzles in a group may be used, without departing from the scope of the present invention. Also, various nozzle cycling phase-shift schemes, with, for example, variations in nozzle duty cycles, other than those described herein, may be used. These and other variations are intended to be within the scope of the present invention as limited only by the following claims.
Claims
- 1. A spray dampening device for a printing apparatus, the spray dampening device comprising a plurality of spray nozzles for applying spray bursts to a surface of a target of a printing apparatus, the spray nozzles being oriented at the same general area on the surface of the target so that the spray bursts spray the same general area, each of the spray nozzles being adapted to be cycled at a predetermined frequency and at an individual nozzle phase shift, the individual nozzle phase shifts being synchronized so that an effective frequency of individual, sequential spray bursts applied to the same general area of the surface is greater than the predetermined frequency, the effective frequency being a frequency in rotational direction of the target as the surface moves past the plurality of nozzles.
- 2. The device as recited in claim 1 wherein the spray nozzles are arranged in a plurality of M rows, M being an integer, each row including at least one spray nozzle, the individual nozzle phase shift of each of the at least one spray nozzle in each row being equal to an individual row phase shift, the individual row phase shifts being synchronized so that the effective frequency of spray bursts applied to the target surface is M times the predetermined frequency.
- 3. The device as recited in claim 2 wherein the plurality of rows of spray nozzles is oriented so that the rows are generally orthogonal to a direction of motion of the target.
- 4. The device as recited in claim 1 wherein the target is a roller and the spray nozzles are arranged in a plurality of M rows, M being an integer, the rows running orthogonal to a longitudinal axis of the roller end and including at least one spray nozzle, the individual nozzle phase shift of each of the at least one spray nozzle in each row being equal to an individual row phase shift, the individual row phase shifts being synchronized so that the effective frequency of spray bursts applied to the target surface is M times the predetermined frequency.
- 5. A spray dampening device for a printing apparatus, the spray dampening device comprising a plurality of spray nozzles arranged in a plurality of rows so as to form an array of spray nozzles, the spray nozzles being arranged in groups, each group of spray nozzles applying spray bursts to a surface of a target of a printing apparatus, each group of the spray nozzles being oriented at the same general area on the surface of the target so that the spray bursts spray the same general area, each of the spray nozzles being adapted to be cycled at a predetermined frequency and at an individual nozzle phase shift, the individual nozzle phase shifts being synchronized so that an effective frequency of individual, sequential spray bursts applied to the same general area of the surface is greater than the predetermined frequency, the effective frequency being a frequency in rotational direction of the target as the surface moves past the plurality of nozzles.
- 6. A spray dampening device for a printing apparatus, the spray dampening device comprising a plurality of spray nozzles arranged in at least one row, the spray nozzles of each of the at least one row being arranged in a plurality of groups including at least two spray nozzles, each group of the plurality of groups of spray nozzles being oriented at the same general area on the surface of the target so that the spray bursts from each group of spray nozzles spray the same general area, each of the spray nozzles in a group being adapted to be cycled at a predetermined frequency and at an individual nozzle phase shift, the individual nozzle phase shifts being synchronized so that an effective frequency of individual, sequential spray bursts applied to the same general area of the surface is greater than the predetermined frequency, the effective frequency being a frequency in rotational direction of the target as the surface moves past the plurality of nozzles.
- 7. The device as recited in claim 6 wherein each group includes an equal number of spray nozzles, the phase shifts of the e spray nozzles in each group being synchronized so that the effective frequency of spray bursts applied to target is equal to the predetermined frequency times the number of spray nozzles in each group.
- 8. A method for spray dampening a printing device, the method comprising the steps of:spraying a dampening solution in spray bursts through a plurality of spray nozzles to a surface of a target of a printing apparatus, wherein each spray nozzle sprays the same general area of the target so that the spray bursts substantially overlap; and cycling each of the spray nozzles at a predetermined frequency and at an individual nozzle phase shift, the individual nozzle phase shifts being synchronized so that an effective frequency of spray bursts applied to the same general area is greater than the predetermined frequency.
- 9. The method as recited in claim 8 wherein the spray nozzles are arranged in a plurality of M rows, M being an integer, each row including at least one spray nozzle, the individual nozzle phase shift of each of the at least one spray nozzle in each row being equal to an individual row phase shift, the individual row phase shifts being synchronized so that the effective frequency of spray bursts applied to the target surface is M times the predetermined frequency.
- 10. The method as recited in claim 9 wherein the plurality of rows of spray nozzles is oriented so that the rows are generally orthogonal to a direction of motion of the target.
- 11. The method as recited in claim 8 wherein the spray nozzles are arranged in at least one spray nozzle row, the at least one spray nozzle row running generally parallel to an axis of the roller.
- 12. The method as recited in claim 8 wherein the spray nozzles are arranged in at least one row, the spray nozzles of each of the at least one row being arranged in a plurality of groups including at least two spray nozzles.
- 13. The method as recited in claim 12 wherein each group includes an equal number of spray nozzles, the phase shifts of the spray nozzles in each group being synchronized so that the effective frequency of spray bursts applied to target is equal to the predetermined frequency times the number of spray nozzles in each group.
- 14. The method as recited in claim 12 wherein the groups are arranged in a plurality of rows and columns so as to form a rectangular array of groups of spray nozzles, each group of spray nozzles in an individual row and an individual column being phase-shifted relative to corresponding spray nozzles in the same individual column of at least one other row.
- 15. A spray dampening device for a printing apparatus, the spray dampening device comprising:a row of spray nozzles for applying spray bursts to a surface of a rotating roller in a printing apparatus, wherein each of the spray nozzles in the row of spray nozzles is oriented at a same general area on the surface of the roller so that the spray bursts from each of the spray nozzles sprays the same general area on the surface of the roller, and wherein each of the spray nozzles in the row of spray nozzles is adapted to be cycled at a predetermined frequency and at an individual nozzle phase shift, the individual nozzle phase shifts being synchronized so that an effective frequency of individual, sequential spray bursts applied to the same general area of the surface is greater than the predetermined frequency, the effective frequency being a frequency in rotational direction of the roller as the surface moves past the plurality of nozzles.
- 16. A spray dampening device for a printing apparatus, the spray dampening device comprising:a plurality of rows of spray nozzles for applying spray bursts to a surface of a rotating roller in a printing apparatus, wherein each of the spray nozzles in one row of the plurality of rows of spray nozzles is oriented at a same general area on the surface of the roller so that the spray bursts from each of the spray nozzles in one row of the plurality of rows of spray nozzles sprays the same general area on the surface of the roller, and wherein each row of the plurality of rows of spray nozzles is oriented at a different general area on the surface of the roller, and wherein each of the spray nozzles in the row of spray nozzles is adapted to be cycled at a predetermined frequency and at an individual nozzle phase shift, the individual nozzle phase shifts being synchronized so that an effective frequency of individual, sequential spray bursts applied to the same general area of the surface by one row of spray nozzles is greater than the predetermined frequency, the effective frequency being a frequency in rotational direction of the roller as the surface moves past the plurality of nozzles.
- 17. A spray dampening device according to claim 16, wherein the rows of spray nozzles are oriented generally orthogonal to an axis of rotation of the roller.
- 18. A spray dampening device according to claim 16, wherein the rows of spray nozzles are oriented generally parallel to an axis of rotation of the roller.
- 19. A spray dampening device for a printing apparatus, the spray dampening device comprising:a plurality of groups of spray nozzles for applying spray bursts to a surface of a rotating roller in a printing apparatus, wherein each of the spray nozzles in one group of the plurality of groups of spray nozzles is oriented at a same general area on the surface of the roller so that the spray bursts from each of the spray nozzles in one group of the plurality of groups of spray nozzles sprays the same general area on the surface of the roller, and wherein each group of the plurality of groups of spray nozzles is oriented at a different general area on the surface of the roller, and wherein each of the spray nozzles in one group of the plurality of groups of spray nozzles is adapted to be cycled at a predetermined frequency and at an individual nozzle phase shift, the individual nozzle phase shifts being synchronized so that an effective frequency of individual, sequential spray bursts applied to the same general area of the surface by one group of spray nozzles is greater than the predetermined frequency, the effective frequency being a frequency in rotational direction of the roller as a surface of the roller moves past the plurality of nozzles.
- 20. A spray dampening device according to claim 19, wherein each group of spray nozzles is formed by a row of spray nozzles.
- 21. A spray dampening device according to claim 20, wherein the rows of spray nozzles are orthogonal to an axis of rotation of the roller.
- 22. A spray dampening device according to claim 20, wherein the rows of spray nozzles are oriented generally parallel to an axis of rotation of the roller.
US Referenced Citations (11)
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
| Number |
Date |
Country |
| 35 45 535-A1 |
Jul 1987 |
DE |
| 0 325 381 |
Jul 1989 |
EP |
| 0 341 384 |
Nov 1989 |
EP |