Patent Application
20180153202
This disclosure relates to spray drying, and to a product obtained thereby.
Spray drying is a commonly-used technique in the formulation of flavors. The flavor is blended with an aqueous matrix material, which is then sprayed into a heated atmosphere. This dries and solidifies the sprayed particles, which can then be collected. Typical matrix constituents comprise an emulsifier, a film-former and/or filler and a plasticizer.
One very commonly used plasticizer is sugar. The function of the plasticizer is to provide low porosity, increased density and increased resistance to oxidation. Sugar performs these tasks admirably. Unfortunately, sugar is also slightly hygroscopic and this reduces the humidity resistance.
It has now been found that it is possible to reduce considerably, and even eliminate completely, this problem, and to obtain spray-dried particles with excellent humidity resistance, plus all the other desirable properties. There is therefore provided a method of preparing spray-dried flavor-containing particles, comprising the addition of flavor to an aqueous, sugar-free matrix and spray-drying the resulting blend, the matrix comprising an emulsifier, a film former and at least one metal salt, selected from the ferrous, alkali metal and alkaline earth metal salts of citric, gluconic and tartaric acids.
There is additionally provided a spray-dried, flavor-containing particle comprising flavor in a sugar-free matrix, the matrix comprising an emulsifier, a film former and at least one metal salt, selected from the ferrous, alkali metal and alkaline earth metal salts of citric, gluconic and tartaric acids.
The matrix may be any of the usual materials known to the art for use in spray-dried flavors. The emulsifier may be selected from any natural material with the desired surface activity. Typical examples include proteins and starches, including modified starches. A particular starch is OSA (octenyl succinate anhydride)-modified starch.
The film-former/filler may be any suitable material, non-limiting examples including food grade and commercially-utilized film formers such as corn syrup solids, gum acacia, modified celluloses, gelatin and other animalic or botanical proteins, a particular example being maltodextrin.
The metal salts are well-known and commercially-available items. Particular examples of such salts include, but are not limited to: potassium gluconate, tripotassium citrate, potassium bitartrate, sodium gluconate, magnesium gluconate and ferrous gluconate. A particular example is potassium gluconate.
More than one such salt may be used. Particular combinations include:
The salts may be used at a concentration of from 10-30% by weight of the non-flavor particle constituents (that is, all particle constituents minus the flavor). The matrix proportion of the particle is from 10-90%. The flavor is present at a proportion of up to 15% by weight of the particle.
Particular individual salt weight proportions of the non-flavor particle constituents include:
Particular combinations of salts by weight of non-flavor particle constituents:
The particles may be produced using standard spray drying equipment and typical conditions known to the art. Conditions may naturally vary depending on the nature of the equipment and the material being sprayed, but the person skilled in the art can readily determine the appropriate conditions in every case with only routine experimentation. Typical examples of conditions that produce dry powder with a moisture content of less than 5% and water activity in the desirable range of from 0.05 to 0.30 at 25° C. Water activity (Aw) is the partial vapor pressure of water in a substance divided by the standard state partial vapor pressure of water. It is a measurement of the relative humidity of the sample in a closed chamber—basically Aw is the equilibrium humidity emitted by the sample material.
Typical parameters for use on a conventional tall-form tower spray dryer are:
The finished material size should be 20-200 μm mean diameter by volume distribution, as measured by laser diffraction particle size instrument.
The disclosure is further described with reference to the following non-limiting examples.
A test matrix was prepared by blending Capsul™ 1450, a sodium octenyl succinate-modified starch, and 25 DE maltodextrin in the weight proportion of 10:90. This is used as a control. When salts were added, the proportion of maltodextrin is reduced by the proportion of salt added. The salts are shown in table 1.
The loading in all cases was an addition to the matrix+salt of D-limonene at a rate of 15% of the matrix+salt.
The particles were prepared by blending the modified starch, maltodextrin and (where applicable) salt/salt mixture into warm water (40° C.). To this, the D-limonene was added, and the mixture subjected to high shear mixing to emulsify the mixture to a mean particle size of less than 1.0 micron as measured by a laser diffraction particle size analyzer.
The emulsion was then spray-dried using an Anhydro PSD55 spray drying unit equipped with a rotary atomizer and a peristaltic delivery pump. Inlet and outlet temperatures were respectively 170° C. (±5° C.) and 95° C. (±3° C.). The powder was recovered by means of a cyclone separator.
The various particles were tested for oxidative stability by determining the proportion of D-limonene remaining after various periods of storage. The samples were stored at 40° C. and 30% relative humidity in LDPE bags of a type that did not provide a barrier to moisture absorption. Samples were analyzed by GC and MS. In addition to the control sample, there were also included two particles made using the same matrix and made using the same conditions and equipment, but with sugar in place of the salts, one with 50% sugar, the other with 40% sugar. These were designated S1 and S2, respectively.
The results are shown in Tables 2 and 3. Table 2 shows the proportion of D-limonene remaining and Table 3 shows the proportion of oxidation by-products present. An acceptable D-limonene loss was less than 10% of the original proportion (i.e. a limonene content of greater than 13.5%), or when the oxidation by-product proportion exceeded 2.5% of the original limonene proportion (at which level the sample fails organoleptically), no further measurements were taken.
From the tables, it can be seen that
Many of the other salts were acceptable for short duration storage times.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2016/061798 | 5/25/2016 | WO | 00 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61166737 | Apr 2009 | US |
