This patent application is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/BE2008/000077, filed Oct. 7, 2008, that claims the benefit of Belgium Application No. 2007/0486, filed Oct. 8, 2007, the entire teachings and disclosure of which are incorporated herein by reference thereto.
The present invention relates to a new lubrication unit for cylinders or rollers of a hot or cold rolling line.
The invention also relates to the implementation method on the unit.
It is known that lubricating rolling cylinders in iron and steel mill is often achieved by spraying (or vaporising) an emulsion, which is a suspension of droplets of oil in water, with an oil concentration typically varying between 0.3 and 2%. It may either be a stable emulsion or an unstable emulsion prepared on the line.
In general, the emulsion is directly applied to the working rollers by means of a spray device located after the scrapers with a view to applying the oil onto a dry surface. This application method ensures better distribution of the oil and as a result contributes to reducing oil consumption.
The point of good lubrication of the working rollers is not simply restricted to the problem of the performance of the rollers (surface deterioration) but is also associated with the rolling forces and torques to be applied, and hence with the required electricity consumption. The need to have efficient lubrication is even more acute when using HSS-type rollers characterised by a higher friction coefficient than traditional rollers, with harder, thinner steels, in conditions of increased production and surface quality imposed by stricter clients.
Among the lubrication conditions, the friction coefficient depends on numerous factors such as the application technology used, the quantity of oil, the nature of the oil, the flow rate and concentration of the oil emulsion, the surface temperature of the strip or of the cylinders, the nature and state of the rollers (roughness, deterioration, scale, thickness of the water film, etc.), the force and speed of rolling, the reduction, the grade and the surface condition of the product, etc. Thus, the lubrication efficiency may be very different from one rolling mill to the next and from one stand to the next in the same mill.
In the laboratory, it was established that the lubrication efficiency depends on the technology for delivering the lubricant, on the nature of the lubricant (mineral, ester-based, etc.) and on the quantity of lubricant implemented. Satisfactory results are obtained by spraying oil over surface distributions (“plate-out”) varying from 0.1 to 1 g/m2.
Conventionally, the device for spraying the oil emulsion is either a venturi nozzle, the oil being sucked by the low pressure created by the water moving in the main tube, or a device with conventional flat nozzles for injecting a stable emulsion, for example a static tube mixer, where the oil is injected into a zone of the tube where the shear (velocity gradient) is increased thanks to the presence of “obstacles”. The venturi nozzle or the static tube mixer is combined with a series of jets, the number of which is selected depending on the width of the strip to be lubricated (three to seven jets for a strip of up to 2 meters wide).
Document EP-A-1 193 004 describes a lubrication method for cold rolling comprising the stages of: providing a rolling oil emulsion using a first oil delivery device in the form of an emulsion delivered to a cylinder and a steel strip in a closed circuit as well as a second emulsion delivery device only on the front and back surfaces of the steel strip. In the second device, the rolling oil is added to an emulsifying agent of the same type and concentration as those used for the first device, with a control of the average particle size to ensure that they are larger than in the first device. The emulsion produced by the second device that did not adhere to the strip is recovered at the same time as the emulsion produced by the first device.
Document WO-A-03/002 277 discloses an installation for cooling and lubricating working rollers in a rolling stand, comprising a cooling water spray bar and a separate spray bar for lubrication oil, for an oil/air, oil/water or oil/air/water mixture, or even for grease.
Document WO-A-03/000 437 discloses an installation and a method for lubricating mill rollers in which an emulsion of oil in water in adjustable proportions is homogeneously prepared in a mixer and delivered to various spray zones, the distribution of which is variable in width. Each zone corresponds to a row of nozzles, each nozzle being controlled by at least one relay valve.
Document JP-A-2001/179 313 discloses a device for applying lubricant, either in the form of undiluted oil or of an emulsion, with a lattice structure allowing even adhesion of the lubricant to a working roller in a rolling stand.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,933,660 proposes a reducing lubrication oil for the hot rolling of copper and its alloys comprising 1,000 parts by weight of water, 6 to 200 parts by weight of anionic surface activator of a carbolic, sulphate or phosphate acid type and 0.8 to 200 parts by weight of at least one compound comprising a hydroxyl group of an alcohol, glycol alkylene or glycol ether type. The rolling oil gives copper and its alloys lubrication, the capacity to remove an oxide film and a capacity to prevent the formation of an oxide film by spraying between the rolling cylinder and the strip to be hot rolled.
Document JP-A-2003/129 079 discloses a lubricant mixture for the plastic working of a metal comprising a carboxylate, a metal acid phosphate or a metal alkylphosphonate.
Document JP-A-55 151 093 describes a lubrication method for the cold rolling of a strip covered with a polar organic compound, where an emulsion of oil and of a mixture comprising a polar organic mixture such as stearic acid is sprayed. The surplus oil emulsion is removed by drying after an oil layer adsorbed to the surface of the strip is formed.
Document WO-A-2005/071 050 discloses a self-emulsifying lubricant for working with metals obtained by maleation of vegetable or animal triglyceride oil.
When used on an industrial scale, the main drawbacks inherent in these devices for spraying an oil emulsion are the following:
To overcome these drawbacks, the Applicant already proposed in document EP-A-1 512 469 a method and an installation for the in-line lubrication of hot rolling cylinders allowing to maintain the friction constant or in any event under control on an industrial scale, to increase the adhesion efficiency of the lubrication oil to the cylinders and to increase the evenness of distribution of the oil over the cylinders.
According to this method, lubrication is achieved by spraying or atomising a lubricant or a mixture of lubricants in the vicinity of the gap of the working cylinders by means of a closed chamber equipped:
The present invention aims to provide a solution that allows to overcome the drawbacks of the state of the art and in particular those associated with the use of oil/water emulsions.
The invention aims to achieve very even lubrication of the cylinders, which is adjustable and controllable both upwards and downwards.
The invention also has the aim of precise and economical use of the lubricant at a very low flow rate for the same efficiency.
The invention also aims to creating an installation that does not require an electricity input at the level of the stand nor heating of the oil.
The invention has the further aim of easy maintenance, thanks in particular to the fact that obstruction of the pipes and nozzles is prevented.
The invention has the further aim of eliminating the risk of fire and of reducing pollution by the lubricant.
The invention has the additional aim of providing nozzles that are directly fitted to a common air manifold, in the form of a compact system that feeds them and also serves as their mechanical support.
The invention further aims at providing an installation comprising either a pump that is common to several nozzles per zone or several dosing pumps for several nozzles with one single pump per nozzle.
Lastly, the invention aims to using unpressurised oil in the nozzle with adjustable flow rate.
A first aspect of the present invention, as indicated in Claim 1, relates to an in-line installation for lubricating rolling cylinders, preferably hot-rolling ones, of a metal strip, preferably a steel one, by spraying or atomising lubricant on a target comprising said rollers and/or said strip, preferably in the vicinity of the roll gap, by means of a controllable air spray bar, arranged in parallel to said cylinders and supplied with compressed air or inert gas, wherein each spray comprises an inlet for the compressed air or inert gas and an inlet for the unpressurised pure oil in an adapter followed by a mixing chamber, as well as an outlet nozzle for the atomised mixture.
Preferred embodiments of the installation as in the invention are described in dependent Claims 2 to 13.
Another aspect of the present invention, as indicated in Claim 14, relates to a method for the in-line lubrication of rolling cylinders, preferably hot-rolling ones, of a metal strip, preferably a steel one, by spraying or atomising lubricant by means of the above-mentioned installation, wherein, at the outlet from the spray bar, a cloud of fine droplets of pure oil pressurised by air is created with a maximum flow rate of 200 ml/min, the oil entering the spray device, the air pressure being below 0.5 bar.
Preferred embodiments of the method as in the invention are described in dependent Claims 15 and 16.
The present invention is based on the principle of atomising air to spray very small quantities of pure oil over the working cylinders. Thanks to the very low concentration of pure oil used, a surface distribution (“plate-out”) of 0 to 0.6 g/m2 may be achieved. With the air-atomising device as in the invention, the spray is formed thanks to the thorough mixture of oil and air emerging from two different pipes, the air and oil being “mixed” just after exiting from the small oil inlet tube. To obtain a perfect spraying pattern, the air pressure and oil flow rate were perfectly adjusted to the type of application considered so as to prevent the formation of a mist.
It is characteristic of the present invention that the oil is not pressurised, i.e. it is at a pressure that is as low as possible, but it is delivered to the nozzles in very small quantities by a (micro)pump, either in combination with a divider or not. The oil flows through a small tube and there is no risk of blocking the nozzle because its aperture has an opening of a size of the order of a millimeter. No heating of the oil is required because the spraying pattern and the size of the droplets are solely controlled by the air pressure.
As a result of the hostile environmental conditions in the stands (high temperatures, humidity, etc.), a robust spray head that can easily withstand these hostile forces is proposed. No cooling of the head is required because it is entirely made of metal. With this system, it is also possible to control the width of spraying in such a way that this width may be matched to the width of the strip. It is then necessary to install an additional pump for this purpose.
According to a first preferred embodiment of the invention, shown in
As an advantage, about fifteen sprays 3 will be provided per bar 2, allowing a treatment width of 2 m, with for example a minimum oil flow rate of 50 ml/minute and a maximum of 150 ml/minute. The preferred values of oil flow rate will be determined for each specific rolling mill based on the rotation speed of the cylinders (up to 20 m/s). Natural oil will preferably be used (thus, no “carrier” medium) at a pressure that is as low as possible (ideally 0 bar), with a viscosity of the order of 20-50 mPa·s. The system will be controlled so as to obtain a “plate-out” of the order of 0.4 g/cm2, which allows to optimise the rolling force and torque. The air pressure may not exceed 0.4-0.45 bar, otherwise there is a risk of mist formation. The nozzle aperture must not be very small, it is typically of Ø1.5 mm so the risk of obstruction is low, as already mentioned.
Each of the sprays 3 of the bar 2 is controlled with a divider 9 provided with as many dosing micropumps as there are sprays on the bar. Each micropump of the divider 9 is supplied by an oil tank 11 and is individually controlled via an oil flow rate controller (12), by a PC 10 (e.g. 15 outlets, 0-40 Hz). The bar 2 is supplied by a compressed air pipe 13. The air pressure value is communicated to the PC for regulation by a manometer 14. The speed of the cylinder 1 is also communicated to the PC by a measurement device 15. An additional On/Off valve (not shown) may be installed in the oil pipe supplying the divider 9 and just before it, for reasons of ease of use of the installation.
The example of the spraying pattern shown in
According to a second preferred embodiment of the invention, shown in
An example of an MDV divider 8 with six outlets 11 sold by Lubriquip Inc., Cleveland, Ohio (USA) is shown in
As an advantage, the oil pressure and the air pressure will be constantly controlled. Similarly, each MDV cycle may be perfectly regulated (for example with a pulse every 0.5 s; for 8 outlets, the interval between two releases=0.0625 s) and may be recorded on a PC. If a pipe is clogged, an alarm signal will be transmitted and will allow to shut off the corresponding MDV valve.
Comparative tests were performed regarding the continuous lubrication of rollers by means of two different types of lubricant, namely with hot rolling oil and colza oil, respectively. The two technologies used are, by emulsion, that using the principle of the static tube as in the state of the art and that using pure oil as in the present invention, respectively.
The static tube comprises four nozzles located at a distance of 20-25 cm from the rollers to be lubricated. The speed of the rollers is between 0.3 and 0.5 m/s and the reduction rate is 50%. Spraying the rollers creates a wet zone with a width of 15 cm.
Industrial conditions corresponding to a “plate-out” of 0.6 g/m2 were simulated. Tests were also performed at higher “plate-out” values.
A theoretical “plate-out” of 0.6 g/m2 corresponds to a flow rate of 5 ml/min (or 1.25 ml/min per nozzle) at a speed of 0.3 m/s and a flow rate of 8 ml/min at a speed of 0.5 m/s.
A theoretical “plate-out” of 4.2 g/m2 corresponds to a flow rate of 32 ml/min (or 8 ml/min per nozzle) at a speed of 0.3 m/s.
A theoretical “plate-out” of 2.5 g/m2 corresponds to a flow rate of 32 ml/min (or 8 ml/min per nozzle) at a speed of 0.5 m/s.
Similar tests were performed with the technology as in the invention, with modular divider valves using pure (colza) oil and air atomisation. The speed of the rollers is 0.3 and the reduction rate is 50%. The spraying width is 20 cm (over a 10 cm strip).
The oil divider was used with a dosing pump and eight outlets (hence eight nozzles). The total flow rate to the divider was 60 ml/min (or 7.5 ml/nozzle), which corresponds to a theoretical “plate-out” of 0.4 g/m2.
These first tests shown in
The advantages of the present invention are, in particular, the following:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2007/0486 | Oct 2007 | BE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/BE2008/000077 | 10/7/2008 | WO | 00 | 6/9/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/046505 | 4/16/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3175643 | Davis, Sr. et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3599866 | Bolton | Aug 1971 | A |
3618709 | Boelkins | Nov 1971 | A |
3933660 | Tadenuma et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
4095674 | Kido et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4511087 | Matsumoto | Apr 1985 | A |
4527661 | Johnstone et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4623455 | Adcock | Nov 1986 | A |
5497852 | Little et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
6036116 | Bui | Mar 2000 | A |
6065693 | Lukas | May 2000 | A |
6145626 | Niemczura et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6182793 | Jamison | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6698551 | Clancy et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6773212 | Inoue | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7036753 | Huffman | May 2006 | B2 |
7096889 | Roys | Aug 2006 | B1 |
20060060425 | Richardson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080116011 | Takahama et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 193 004 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1 512 469 | Mar 2005 | EP |
55151093 | Nov 1980 | JP |
2001179313 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2003129079 | May 2003 | JP |
WO 03000437 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03002277 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2005071050 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2006053996 | May 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100258380 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |