0.5 This invention relates to a technique for hydrating ginned cotton in a cotton gin.
In order to improve operation of gin stands in the ginning of cotton, seed cotton is dried to reduce the water content to low single digits at a location upstream of gin stands where seeds are removed from lint.
Low water content also helps lint cleaners upstream and downstream of the gin stands to separate seed cotton or cotton from dust and plant parts. Before the lint passes into a bale press, it is desirable to rehumidify the cotton lint so the bale press works efficiently—very dry cotton lint tends to rebound when the bale press retracts.
A typical gin includes a conduit or duct delivering cotton and propelling air from the gin stands through a downstream cleaner into a battery condenser where a screen allows air to escape thereby forming a cotton batt which slides by gravity down a lint slide into the bale press. The standard technique for rehumidifying cotton is to deliver high humidity air through the bottom of the lint slide so it passes upwardly through the batt whereby some or all of the water condenses on the cotton fibers.
Large modern commercial gins run about 60 bales/hour while small gins deliver at least 15 bales/hour. A bale is about 500 pounds of lint so the amount of cotton sliding down the lint slide may be in the range of 7500-30,000 pounds per hour or 2-8 pounds per second. One can imagine that getting a substantially uniform dispersion of condensed water on the batt with current equipment is unlikely.
It has been attempted in the prior art to spray a water taggant solution on a cotton batt as it slides down the lint slide. The results were not satisfactory because the taggant was not found on a disappointingly large fraction of cotton fibers.
Disclosures of some interest relative to this invention are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,178,539; 2,764,013; 3,717,904; 3,834,869; 4,019,225; 4,074,546; 6,237,195; 6,240,601; 6,314,618; 6,389,647; 6,807,750; 7,591,048; 7,912,653 and 8,091,181 and U.S. Printed Patent Application 2014/0106357.
As disclosed herein, water is sprayed into an air duct downstream of the gin stands and upstream of the battery condenser while the cotton fibers are being pneumatically transported toward the battery condenser, i.e. while the cotton fibers are suspended in propulsion air. A mind's eye picture of the cotton/air mixture flowing through the duct is analogous to the worst imaginable blizzard. Flow through the duct may be relatively fast, e.g. 1500-2000′/minute or 25-34′ per second. The amount of cotton flowing through the duct varies, of course, with the capacity of the gin but for common gins is in the range of 2-8 pounds per second. A nozzle assembly is designed to produce water droplets that are of a diameter that is the same order of magnitude than the diameter of ginned cotton fibers.
It is an object of this invention to provide an improved technique for rehumidifying cotton lint upstream of a bale press.
A more specific object of this invention is to provide a technique for rehumidifying cotton lint upstream of a bale press in a manner that produces uncommonly consistent dispersion of liquid water onto cotton fibers.
A further object of this invention is to provide an improved technique for tagging cotton fibers with a material that can later be detected.
Another object of this invention is to spray water and a solution onto cotton fibers upstream of a bale press.
These and other objects of this invention will become more fully apparent as this description proceeds.
Referring to
Conveying air introduced in a conventional manner downstream of the gin stands 24 delivers cotton fibers through the cleaner 26 and through a duct 28 leading to a battery condenser 32. The duct 28 may be a wide rectangular duct which necks down through a transition 30 to a round duct 34. Inside the battery condenser 32 is a screen 36 or other suitable means for separating conveying air flow cotton lint and producing a cotton batt 38. The cotton batt 38 slides by gravity along a lint slide 40 into to a bale press 42 where the ginned cotton is compressed into a gin bale.
Conveying air from the battery condenser 32 passes through a conduit 44 to one or more cyclones 46 for removing dust from the conveying air before exhausting it to the atmosphere. Those skilled in the art will recognize the gin 10 as heretofore described as being typical of modern commercial gins. The disclosures of U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,046,877 and 8,356,389 are incorporated herein by reference for a more complete description of a cotton gin.
As will be explained more fully hereinafter, a series of nozzle assemblies 48 delivers a water spray into the duct 28 at one or more locations downstream of the gin stands 24, such as between the gin stands 24 and the lint cleaner 26 or between the lint cleaner 26 and the battery condenser 32. Downstream of the lint cleaner 26 may be preferred because many lint cleaners are more efficient with drier cotton lint. The water spray may preferably be into the duct 28 upstream of the battery condenser 32 or into the battery condenser 32 upstream of the screen 36 or other device to separate propulsion air from ginned cotton fibers. It may be preferred to have the nozzle assemblies 48 spraying water into the wide rectangular duct 28 because the cotton fibers are traveling at a lower speed than in the smaller round duct 34 where velocities are higher thereby promoting more consistent dispersion of water droplets onto the cotton lint.
Another advantage of spraying into the wide rectangular duct 28 is there is considerably more room for a large number of nozzle assemblies 48 as compared to the smaller round duct 34 as may be visualized in
Referring to
The nozzle 54 is connected to a water supply line 62 and an air supply line 64. An oddity of the nozzle 54 is that it is capable of delivering very small droplets in the range of 5-25 micron diameter microns which is about the same size as the width or diameter of many cotton fibers. Preferably, the water droplets may be in the range of 5-25 microns and which may preferably be about 8-12 microns in diameter and which may practically be about microns in diameter. Cotton fibers may vary somewhat in diameter but this variation will likely be in the range of 7-22 microns. As pointed out more fully hereinafter, it is believed the size of the water droplets being about the same diameter as the width of the cotton fibers promotes the efficiency of contacting fibers with water droplets.
The nozzle assemblies 48 can be purchased commercially from such companies as Spray.com of Wheaton, Ill. By controlling the water pressure to the assembly 48 with a regulator 66 and controlling the air pressure at the assembly 48 with a regulator 68, the size of droplets emitting from the nozzle 54 and the rate of water delivery can be controlled in a conventional manner, i.e. a table may be provided by the manufacturer so that if water pressure is selected and air pressure is selected, the droplet size and water quantity can be dictated.
To test how consistent water is applied to cotton fibers with the device of
Such a taggant may be of any suitable type but, in the test, artificial DNA was used. The DNA taggant was from Applied DNA Science of Stony Brook, N.Y. Thirty two milliliters of DNA in a total of one liter of DNA/water solution was injected per minute into the water conduit 62 and sprayed into the duct 28 in a gin delivering 20 bales/hour of Pima cotton. Thus, 1920 milliliters/hour of the DNA solution was sprayed onto 20 bales/hour or approximately 10,000 pounds/hour of Pima cotton. The DNA solution was diluted by a substantial amount of water, as explained more fully hereinafter, meaning that the concentration of DNA in the DNA solution is susceptible of wide variation because it will be diluted significantly in the spraying operation.
At a rate of about 350 bales/day, a total of about 10,000 bales of cotton were sprayed with the DNA solution. A total of twelve fiber samples per day were delivered to a laboratory to determine whether the DNA taggant was present on the fiber or a total of about 350 fiber samples. 100% of the fiber samples submitted to the laboratory tested positive for the DNA taggant, Meaning that every tooted fiber had contacted a water droplet. This is difficult for knowledgeable cotton gin people to believe because the number of individual fibers in 10,000 bales of cotton is immense, almost beyond imagination. This is not proof that every fiber in the 10,000 bales had been contacted with water but sophisticated statistical calculations will show, to a very high degree of confidence, that a very large proportion of fibers were contacted with DNA laced water. The exact mechanism that distributes taggant so efficiently is not known and the invention is not bound by any theory. One may surmise that some of the fibers were contacted directly by sprayed taggant but it is not known that all of the tested fibers were contacted directly by sprayed taggant. It is possible that taggant was transferred indirectly to some fibers by a tagged fiber rubbing against an untagged fiber. Given the turmoil of fibers jostling along in a propulsion air stream, this seems possible and perhaps likely.
It is apparent this technique is a viable approach to mark fibers, including cotton fibers, in a quality control effort. Tagging a select type of cotton fibers with DNA taggants can readily assure that the select type of fibers is present in processed threads or textiles. In addition, it is clearly feasible to spray water onto ginned cotton upstream of a battery condenser with a penetrant, other than a taggant or marker, that has beneficial effects on cotton fibers. The penetrant may be of any suitable type such as a surfactant, wetting agent or the like.
Another advantage of this invention is that it is much, much cheaper than conventional rehumidifying equipment. The only cost are some commercially available nozzles, a water source, a source of low pressure air, conventional low pressure regulators, valves, a computer controller and the labor to install the equipment. The required water pressure in most applications is well below the pressure of conventional city water systems, meaning that no additional water pumping equipment is necessary.
Referring to
A series of nozzle assemblies 106 delivers a water spray into the duct 100 at one or more locations downstream of the cleaners 82, 88. It may be preferred to have the nozzle assemblies 108 spraying water into the wide rectangular duct 100 rather than into the round duct 104 for the same reasons it may be desirable to spray water into the rectangular duct 28 rather than the round duct 32.
Referring to
It may be advantageous to spray water into the dead air space 132 for a variety of reasons. Pressure in the dead air space 132 is lower than atmospheric pressure because of the change of direction of lint flow. This allows outside air to flow, without a fan or pump, past the nozzle assemblies 130 to dislodge cotton or water collecting, or tending to collect, on the nozzle assemblies 130 as will be pointed out more fully hereinafter. Another aspect of the dead air space 132 is that lint flow detaches from the wall 122 along a line or zone 134 leaving the space 132 mostly free of cotton. This allows spray from the nozzle assemblies 130 to spread out before contacting any cotton thereby increasing the ability of the spray to reach most or all of the cotton fibers. Another advantage of the dead air space 132 is to allow ambient air to enter the duct 110 and thereby flow past the nozzle assemblies 130 in order to dislodge or prevent the accumulation of debris on the assemblies 130.
Referring to Figure /, there is illustrated another approach to create a dead air space into which water spray may be directed. A round or pipe shaped duct 136 is located between the gin stands and the battery condenser and includes an inlet 138, an enlarged section 140 and an outlet 142. Because of the increase in diameter of the pipe wall 144 at a location 146, a dead air space 148 is created where the lint detaches from the wall 144 along a line 150 downstream of the location 146. The dead air space 148 is roughly annular because the duct 136 is round.
It will be apparent that many different approaches may be devised to create a dead air space in a duct of a pneumatic conveyor, as by the provision of a compartment 152 opening into a duct 154 as shown in
Some of the effects of a dead air space can be created by forcibly blowing air into a duct 168 as shown in
Referring to
It may be desirable to employ filters to remove particles in the same range or larger than the water droplets emitting from the spray nozzles. To this end, referring to
It may be desirable to employ a heater in the water supply to minimize the effects of operating in abnormally cold climates or during an abnormally cold time of the year. To this end, a heater 206 may be incorporated in the water supply line 62.
Although this invention has been disclosed and described in its preferred forms with a certain degree of particularity, it is understood that the present disclosure of the preferred forms is only by way of example and that numerous changes in the details of operation and in the combination and arrangement of parts may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as hereafter claimed.
This application is based on Provisional Patent Application 62/179,452, filed May 6, 2015, priority of which is claimed and which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62179452 | May 2015 | US |