The present invention provides an apparatus that is easily attached to and removed from a hand-held leaf blower for the distribution, through the outlet air stream, of particulate matter including fertilizers, weed killers, pesticides and seed.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The prior art includes several patents related to devices for dispensing particulates and grass seeds and fertilizers. U.S. Pat. No. 6,409,097 to McCauley (2002) discloses an apparatus that is designed for liquid dispersal or dry material using a hand held leaf blower as a source of air flow. However, this invention does not take advantage of the low pressure area created by the nozzle of the present invention to assist in particulate feed into the air stream. U.S. Pat. No. 5,964,420 to Hampton (1998) discloses a device for attachment for a leaf blower for applying powdered pesticides to a lawn or garden but is not well suited for dispersal of larger particulates or seeds. U.S. Pat. No. 5,779,161 to Dvorak (1998) discloses an apparatus for dispensing powdered and granulated materials and cites a conventional leaf blower as a motive source, but is unclear on how a leaf blower might be attached. U.S. Pat. No. 5,392,996 to Ussery (1994) discloses an apparatus that attaches to the intake of a leaf blower for introducing particulates into the air intake for dispersion through the outlet. Although this method would work, it would probably damage the leaf blower since the intake air is also used to cool the engine. The particulates would no doubt adhere to the cooling fins of the engine, causing it to overheat in a short time. U.S. Pat. No. 4,474,327 to Mattson et al. (1984) discloses a spreader attachment for leaf blowers. The disclosed method of entraining particulate material within the discharge air stream of a blower appears to be susceptible to clogging and other interference. It also appears to be a complicated apparatus to fabricate. U.S. Pat. No. 5,190,225 to Williams (1993) discloses a device for the dispersal of particulates, but lacks the simplicity of the present invention. U.S. Pat. No. 3,586,238 to Schmierer et. al. (1971) is similar to the apparatus described by U.S. Pat. No. 5,190,225 but seems more suited to dispensing nutrients and fertilizers and pesticides entrained in a liquid medium. It use appears to be limited to this use and would be costly to manufacture for this singular use. U.S. Pat. No. 5,429,278 to Sansalone (1994) discloses an apparatus specifically designed for fine particulates such as pesticides, and does not appear to have the capacity to accommodate large granular nutrients or seeds. U.S. Pat. No. 4,658,778 to Gamoh, et al. (1987) discloses a powered backpack unit designed to dispense fine particulates. This invention suffers from the same design flaw as Ussery, in that the particulate is introduced in the air supply which also cools the engine. U.S. Pat. No. 4,256,241 to Mesic (1981) discloses a device for the application of pesticide dust. This unit does not appear to be able to dispense large granular nutrients or seed due to this design. The material container is only suitable for a small amount of fine particulate material that could be distributed as a fine dust over many plants or a large grassy area to be treated for an infestation. U.S. Pat. No. 5,226,567 to Sansalone (1993) discloses an air-powered device for applying dust to garden plants. The device is limited in the capacity of the material container to powdered insecticides, and would not be able to dispense large granular nutrients due to the possibility of clogging of the delivery mechanism. U.S. Pat. No. 1,406,903 to Rose (1922) disclosed a hand held dry spray gun. This unit was not designed for fertilizer; it might be able to dispense seeds, but appears to be primarily designed for spraying dust.