The present invention relates to a device for use with stall doors that may be found in public restrooms, and particularly to a reliable torsion spring and hinge assembly used to automatically return a stall door to a closed position.
Individual stalls in public area restrooms found in schools, airports, movie theaters, stadiums, and recreation parks, etc. are generally provided by subdividing walls in the form of separate vertical bathroom partitions installed after the restroom has been finished. When one end of a bathroom partition is mounted on a traditional wall, the other end of the partition generally terminates at a stile. These partition walls may be attached by brackets or other devices to a stile in a plane perpendicular to the stile. Stiles may be used to frame doors in bathroom compartments, wherein the door is mounted in line with and between two stiles. The stiles themselves may be anchored to the floor, hung from the ceiling, or both.
Another stall is provided for handicapped access consisting of side panels 17 and an outward swinging door 15 attached to a stile 16 using a hinge 13. The front of the stall is cordoned off by the door 15 and a connector panel 9 as well as the stiles 16 on which the door 15 and connector panel 9 are mounted. Depending on the installation, the door 15 can swing through an arc up to as much as approximately 180 degrees. The door 15 may also be provided with a stop 10 to prevent the door 15 from swinging past the fully closed position.
In general, inward swinging stall doors must remain closed or partially closed even if the stall. is not in use. Outward swinging stall doors such as those used in handicapped accessible stalls are required to remain completely closed if the stall is not in use for safety and other reasons. Stall doors may be kept closed when not in use by a pre-loaded force of the spring where an institutional hinge is used, or by a cam which uses the door's own weight and gravity to induce the door to rotate. The spring and hinge assembly, also known as an institutional hinge, is desirable in certain situations because its simple and sturdy construction resists vandalism and because it provides greater privacy to an occupant of a stall in which it is installed by covering the majority of the gap between a stall door and stile on the hinge side.
Restroom stall doors in heavy use areas such as airports and recreation parks may be used as much as several hundred times a day. As such, where these doors are mounted using spring and hinge assemblies, the springs should preferably be able to function for at least several hundred thousand cycles before failing and requiring replacement. Torsion spring and hinge assemblies used currently do not meet these customer goals for partitions. It is important that a reliable device be provided which causes the stall door to come to a completely closed position on its own; otherwise it can be especially difficult for a person in a wheel chair to properly latch the door as they will need to manually pull the door in to do so.
In place of a torsion spring and hinge assembly, a cam and hinge assembly or short barrel cam hinges may be used which do not incorporate springs needing periodic replacement. However, these hinges require that the stile be properly aligned and upright to function properly, and do not provide the privacy of the torsion spring and hinge assembly due to the inherent gaps 11 and 12 present between the stiles 16 and the doors 15 and 18 respectively, of the stalls.
Despite the reverse bend being a widespread feature among torsion springs in the art, it is especially common for these springs to fail under normal use at the location of the reverse bends that join the spring arms to the spring coils. A load placed on the spring arms 23 and counteracted by a reaction force induced in the coil body 29 will naturally tend to concentrate at the place where the spring arms 23 meet the coil body 29, placing a reverse tension on the material of the reverse bends 22 prior to transferring to the coil body 29 of the spring 20. Compounding this problem are the preexisting internal stresses in the material of the spring 20 in the vicinity of the reverse bends 22 caused by the creation of the reverse bends 22. Finally, there is the remaining wear as the spring 20 flexes the spring arms 23 against the edges of the hinge halves 25.
The confluence of these factors has a deleterious effect on the longevity of known torsion springs, and commonly causes them to fail in the area of the reverse bend in an unacceptably short time. The reliability of known torsion springs is much worse when used with a hinge on a door which opens to an angle greater than 90 degrees, as is often the case with stalls having outward swinging door designs. These failures lead to customer complaints due to toilet partition doors that remain in an open position but are required to be closed. Were a solution to this problem to be found, it would improve reliability and customer satisfaction as well as reduce the costs associated with field replacements of damaged spring and hinge assemblies, stocking and handling replacement spring and hinge assemblies.
An exemplary embodiment of the present hinge assembly provides one or more of the following benefits. First, an institutional hinge assembly provides a user with more privacy within the stall than with barrel hinges. Furthermore, by having a spring loaded hinge rather than a cam hinge that operates using gravity, concerns over proper stile alignment are minimized. If a stile to which a door is attached using an institutional hinge is out of alignment, the door may still close. However, with a cam hinge, gravity works to keep the door open rather than closing it as it should. Known spring loaded hinges have used prior art springs which frequently break leaving stall doors in the open position and the door itself opened into the restroom walking space in the case of outward swinging doors. This impinges on the open space of the restroom, and may possibly injury a restroom user. Lastly, when known spring loaded hinges using prior art springs have failed in the past leaving the outswing doors of handicapped accessible stall doors in the open position, it has proven difficult for a handicapped user to close the door manually. An embodiment of the present hinge avoids one or more of these problems.
In an exemplary embodiment a hinge assembly comprises a first hinge half, a second hinge half, a spring, and a pin passing through the spring joining the first hinge half and the second hinge half. The spring in turn comprises a coil body, a first spring arm extending from the coil body having a first distal end portion, a second spring arm extending from the coil body having a second distal end portion, a first support extending from the first distal end portion towards the first hinge half and bearing on the first hinge half, and a second support extending from the second distal end portion towards the second hinge half and bearing on the second hinge half.
In another embodiment, a hinge assembly comprises a first hinge half having a first top surface and at least one raised knuckle rising above the first top surface, a second hinge half having a second top surface and at least one raised knuckle rising above the second top surface, a spring, and a pin passing through spring joining the first hinge half and the second hinge half. The spring in turn comprises a coil body, a first spring arm extending from a point on the coil body above the first top surface, a second spring arm extending from a point on the coil body above the second top surface.
In an exemplary embodiment a stall assembly comprises a hinge assembly, a stall door attached to the first hinge half, a partition stile attached to the second hinge half, and a spring. The hinge assembly comprises a first hinge half, a second hinge half and a pin joining the first hinge half and the second hinge half. The spring comprises a coil body through which the pin passes, a first spring arm extending from the coil body having a first distal end portion, a second spring arm extending from the coil body having a second distal end portion, a first support extending from the first distal end portion towards the first hinge half and bearing on the first hinge half, and a second support extending from the second distal end portion towards the second hinge half and bearing on the second hinge half.
Before any embodiment of the invention is explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and arrangements of components set forth in the following description, or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of alternative embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways. For example, numerical dimensions and other specified numerical limitations, where they appear on the following drawings represent those of exemplary embodiments only and may be modified by one skilled in the art as conditions warrant. Also, it is to be understood, that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of illustrative description and should not be regarded as limiting.
In an exemplary embodiment, a new spring and hinge design is provided which maintains the benefits of previous designs while greatly improving the reliability of the spring. According to an exemplary embodiment, the reliability of the spring may be improved from several thousand cycles to several hundred thousand cycles.
Without the spring 50, the hinge halves 55 will swing freely on the axis of the hinge pin 58. When spring 50 is installed, it will force the hinge halves to rotate towards each other around the hinge pin. In order to further avoid friction between the spring arms 53 of the spring 50 and the edges of the hinge halves 55, the hinge halves 55 may be modified by adding notches 66 to remove material from the locations where the spring arms 53 would be in contact with the hinge halves 55. In an alternative embodiment, several torsion springs 50 may be provided on the hinge pin 58 between the hinge knuckles 64. In a further alternative embodiment, the notches 66 may be provided adjacent to the knuckles 64 on the hinge halves 55.
In an exemplary embodiment, a support has been added to the distal ends 56, shown in
By adjusting the angle between the spring arms 53 of the spring 50, a greater or lesser pre-load force may be provided when the torsion spring 50 is incorporated into a hinge assembly. This force may be maintained by the use of a door stop on the door or stile of a stall in which the hinge assembly incorporating the spring 50 is used. The stop will prevent the door from swinging past the closed position and eliminating the pre-load force. This pre-load force ensures that the door is self closing and stays in the closed position when not in use, and allows a handicapped person to latch the door closed without having to manually shut the door first—a significant convenience for a wheelchair bound person.
In the embodiment of the spring 50 shown in
This application is a division of Application Ser. No. 11/101,304 filed on Apr. 7, 2005, which issued on Apr. 21, 2009 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,520,022, entitled SPRING AND HINGE ASSEMBLY FOR INSTALLING A DOOR ON TOILET PARTITIONS, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
529312 | Riley | Nov 1894 | A |
724039 | Peterkin | Mar 1903 | A |
882289 | Bommer | Mar 1908 | A |
926520 | Thornton et al. | Jun 1909 | A |
1084111 | Rolfson-Schmidt | Jan 1914 | A |
1230555 | Brennecke | Jun 1917 | A |
1384260 | Kanter | Jul 1921 | A |
1715590 | Burhenne | Jun 1929 | A |
1892584 | Olson | Dec 1932 | A |
1925945 | Zielinski et al. | Sep 1933 | A |
2174430 | Valentine et al. | Sep 1939 | A |
2497266 | Levane | Feb 1950 | A |
2807043 | Gordon | Sep 1957 | A |
2853924 | Herzfeld et al. | Sep 1958 | A |
2867842 | Morton | Jan 1959 | A |
3106010 | Morrell | Oct 1963 | A |
3329991 | Gobble | Jul 1967 | A |
3737182 | Sharpe | Jun 1973 | A |
4193164 | Okayama | Mar 1980 | A |
4823438 | Roloff | Apr 1989 | A |
5533234 | Bizek | Jul 1996 | A |
5771539 | Wahlstedt et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5826306 | Faubert et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6205618 | Lee | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6553623 | Long | Apr 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090199363 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11101304 | Apr 2005 | US |
Child | 12422910 | US |