The present invention relates to a spring for a cascade-type thrust reverser shutter for an aircraft jet engine.
As is known per se, a cascade-type thrust reverser for an aircraft jet engine typically comprises a plurality of shutters secured to the sliding cowl of this reverser, collaborating with link rods connected to the inner fixed structure of the thrust reverser.
When the thrust reverser is operating in direct-jet mode, the shutters are kept by the link rods in the continuation of the internal wall of the sliding cowl.
When the thrust reverser is operating in reverse-jet mode, the shutters are actuated by the link rods to make them close off the cavity through which the secondary or bypass air of the jet flows, and thus divert the stream of secondary or bypass air forward, reversing the thrust and providing the aircraft fitted with such a reverser with additional braking.
It is known practice to fit springs between the link rods and the shutters, to compensate for differences in tolerances and structural deformations when the shutters are in the “direct jet” position, while at the same time allowing the link rods to apply sufficient pressure on these shutters in this position.
To date, various types of spring, either helical or leaf springs, have been used.
The disclosure provides a spring that is lighter in weight than those of the prior art.
Particularly, a leaf spring is provided for a thrust reverser shutter, characterized in that it has two branches defining a U-shape, the ends of these branches being able to collaborate respectively with one shutter of said reverser and with a link rod that actuates this shutter.
By virtue of this special shape, the ends of this spring are subjected to low or zero bending moments, which makes it possible to have a spring which, for a given mass, exhibits better elastic behavior.
According to other optional features of this spring:
The present invention also relates to a cascade-type thrust reverser notable in that it comprises at least one spring in accordance with the aforegoing.
The present invention also relates to a jet engine nacelle, notable in that it comprises a thrust reverser in accordance with the aforegoing.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from reading the description which will follow and from examining the attached figures, in which:
Reference is made to
As is known per se, the sliding cowl and the inner fixed structure 5 between them define an annular cold air flow path 7.
In the normal mode of operation, that is to say in cruising flight, the cold air flows along inside this flow path 7 as indicated by the arrow 9 in
In this mode of operation, this cold air 9 adds to the hot air leaving the jet engine (not depicted), thus contributing to the thrust of an aircraft (not depicted).
In thrust-reversal mode (see
This sliding has the effect of causing the annular flow path 7 to be blocked off by a plurality of shutters 13 distributed all around this flow path, just one of these being visible in
Each shutter 13 is mounted in an articulated manner on the sliding cowl 1, and its movement from the position visible in
More specifically, and as can be seen in
This spring is U-shaped overall, that is to say comprises two branches 19, 21 connected to one another by a curved part 23.
Each of these two branches in fact has a forked end, that is to say an end comprising two parts, 19a, 19b and 21a, 21b, respectively.
The parts 21a, 21b of the branch 21 are fixed at their respective ends to the shutter 13 by appropriate means such as rivets 23a, 23b.
For preference, as can be seen in
The two parts 19a, 19b of the branch 19 preferably have a shape that tapers from the curved part 23 of the spring toward the end of the branch 19.
Each of these parts 19a, 19b has, at its end, a turned-over portion 27b formed as an integral part of the remainder of the spring 17, and defining a bearing for one end 29 of the link rod 15.
For this purpose, a spindle 31 extends between the two turned-over portions 27a, 27b and through the end 29 of the link rod 15, it being possible for this spindle to be held in place using pins 33.
As is particularly visible in
Advantageously, the spring 17 may be at least partially formed of a titanium alloy and/or of a composite material.
The table below shows that very good spring performance can be obtained, particularly with an alloy of the TV866 titanium alloy type, or with composite materials of the woven UD glass/epoxy or woven UD carbon/epoxy type.
In this table Δ indicates the permissible fatigue stress of the material, E indicates the elastic modulus of the material, the Energy is equal to Δ2/E, the Density indicates the density of the material, and the Performance is defined as the ratio between the Energy and the Density.
The spring described hereinabove is able to compensate for differences in tolerances and structural deformations when the shutter 13 is in the “direct jet” position, that is to say is in the position depicted in
While at the same time providing this compensation for tolerances, the spring 17 allows the link rod 15 to apply sufficient pressure on the shutter 13 to keep it in its position depicted in
As indicated hereinabove, the U-shape of the spring, the fact that its two branches are positioned facing one another, the tapering cross sections of these two branches and the choice of the material of which it is made allow an excellent compromise to be reached between spring performance and the weight saving it is able to afford.
By way of indication, such a spring makes it possible to save 150 g by comparison with a spring of the prior art.
In the knowledge that there are twelve or so springs such as this fitted to a cascade-type thrust reverser, it then becomes possible to save 1800 g per thrust reverser.
Now, as is well known in aeronautical engineering, the weight penalty for 1 g is set at $1.
In this particular instance, the saving that can be had through the spring of the invention is therefore evaluated at $1800 per thrust reverser.
Assuming that the spring is made of titanium, a material that is slightly more expensive than traditional materials, the saving would reduce to approximately $1500 per reverser.
Of course, the present invention is not in any way restricted to the embodiment described and depicted, which was provided solely by way of example.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0705893 | Aug 2007 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2008/000844 | 6/18/2008 | WO | 00 | 2/19/2010 |