1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a presssure relief device for use with distillation trays in chemical process columns.
Several tray designs are known for use in distillation columns (also called towers). In each design, trays are situated within the columns for contact of vapor and liquid between the components of mixtures. Detailed tray designs are described by, for example, Philip C. Wankat in “Equilibrium Staged Separations” published by Elsevier (1988), C. Judson King in “Separation Processes” published by McGraw-Hill Book Company (2nd edition, 1980), Henry Z. Kister in “Distillation Design” published by McGraw-Hill, Inc. (1992), and Johann G. Stichlmair and James R. Fair in “Distillation: Principles and Practice” published by Wiley-VCH (1998).
Distillation columns are designed for the performance of a variety of separation processes, as illustrated in commercial literature available from column manufacturers such as “Trays for Distillation, Absorption, Stripping and Extraction” published by UOP Process Equipment, Tonawanda, N.Y., USA. It will be appreciated that the benefits of the present invention may accrue when the invention is used in designs of trays for different types of column.
Typically, a tray deck is perforated to allow vapor to rise through perforations and bubble through liquid flowing across the tray deck (called a cross-flow tray), thereby effecting contact between the liquid and the vapor. An outlet weir is situated toward the edge of the tray deck adjacent an outlet downcomer, so as to maintain a depth of liquid and froth across the tray deck. The perforations in the deck may include valves, bubble caps, and other devices designed to improve vapor-liquid contact and to control the flow of vapor rising through the perforations.
The safe and efficient operation of a column requires that at all stages within the column there is steady state mass transfer between liquid and vapor phases. To achieve these results, it is necessary to design the tray to handle the desirable vapor and liquid throughputs below tray capacity. However, at different times during operation of a column, and in particular during start up, the potential exists for an excess of one or the other of vapor or liquid to be present at one or more trays within the column. When this non-equilibrium condition occurs, an excessive pressure difference can be created between the zone above and the zone below a tray. Similar phenomena during operation may also occur if the liquid level at the bottom of the column is above the reboiler vapor return inlet. Typically, trays are designed to withstand a limited amount of pressure difference. When that pressure difference is exceeded, damage may occur to the tray and other column internal structure, necessitating considerable down time and expensive repairs. In particular, it is important to be able to relieve sudden pressure surges, and especially when they take place below a tray, because surges can damage the tray. One example of such a pressure surge is when an amount of water is vaporized rapidly to steam at a location within a column. For example, in a typical atmospheric pressure column for distillation of crude oil, flashing of as little as one-third of a cubic foot of water in one second will cause a pressure differential of 1.5 to 2.5 pounds per square inch across one or more stacked distillation trays in the column. Such a pressure differential may cause damage to or displacement of the trays, thereby affecting operation of the column. It is thus desirable that steps are taken to relieve such pressure differentials should they occur.
Chatfield in U.S. Pat. No. 2,045,518 (Jun. 23, 1936) discloses a pressure relief system applicable only to bubble cap trays, but this system reduces distillation capability of the column. Also, the system does not allow relief in the event of rapid development of a pressure differential.
Parsons in U.S. Pat. No. 2,105,501 (Jan. 19, 1938) discloses a circular pressure relief disc that occupies a large proportion of the tray area, and therefore reduces tray capacity.
Constantikes in U.S. Pat. No. 2,809,821 (Oct. 15, 1957) describes a pressure balancing system that does not allow relief of sudden pressure surges.
Gilmore in U.S. Pat. No. 2,846,204 (Aug. 5, 1958) describes plate valves for providing vapor-liquid contact, and these also have some capability of relieving some level of pressure surge. However, the system is expensive, does not have general applicability, and is described by DiNicolantonio in U.S. Pat. No. 4,133,852 (Jan. 9, 1979) as being prone to sticking and jamming.
Doering in U.S. Pat. No. (Oct. 1, 1963) discloses variable opening jet tabs for relief of small pressure surges, and these are limited in utility. Additional apparatus capable of withstanding or relieving small pressure differentials at a tray are described bu Uitti in U.S. Pat. No. 3,632,315 (Jan. 4, 1972), Boon in U.S. Pat. No. 3,649,466 (Mar. 14, 1972), Hirao in U.S. Pat. No. 3,807,711 (Apr. 30, 1974), and Tjutjunnikov in U.S. Pat. No. 3,817,501 (Jun. 18, 1974).
DiNicolantonio et al. in the above-referenced U.S. Pat. No. 4,133,852, disclose a hinged tray design for use preferably in distillation columns, capable of relieving small but sudden pressure surges caused by the flashing of relatively small amounts of water in a column feed or in the stripping steam, described as having superior performance and better capability to relieve sudden pressure surges than the appartuses described in the above patents. However, when the hinged portion of the tray rises at an angle to relieve the pressure differential, the vapor at excess pressure is vented in a directed manner that is determined by the position of the hinge and consequent angle of the hinged portion of the tray, so that the vented material is not uniformly distributed, and consequently could do secondary damage in the area to which it is vented, such as the tray immediately above the tray being vented.
What is needed is an alternative apparatus for relieving a sudden surge below or above a tray in a column by venting material through the tray that more uniformly distributes vapor released to the tray above that being vented.
2. General Description of the Invention
The present invention relates to an improved design for relieving a sudden pressure surge below a tray within a distillation column. A plurality of spring loaded pressure relief devices is incorporated into the deck of the tray. Each device has perforations through which vapor normally rises to mix with liquid flowing across the deck. Each device has a plurality of springs that enable the device to rise above or fall below the level of the remainder of the deck when subject to a pressure surge, and to return the device to deck level when the pressure surge has been relieved, thereby relieving the effects of the pressure surge without interrupting operation of the column and preventing damage to the internals of the column.
The improved design can deliver predictable and evenly distributed pressure relieve during abnormal operation. It can also be incorporated into trays used for vapor-liquid absorption and liquid-liquid extraction columns.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and for further objects and advantages thereof, reference is made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring to
The tray 12 includes a plurality of spring loaded pressure relief devices 10 located across the extent of deck 14. The pressure relief devices 10 are vertically movable relative to a fixed section 62 (
The head 38 of the housing 46 has a hole through which the upper end 66 of the piston 48 extends. When the pressure relief device 10 is in the closed position, the bottom 70 of the piston 48 is adjacent to the base 42 of the housing 46, as shown in
Referring to
A sleeve (not illustrated) may be used to guide and protect the piston 48 from abbrasion through contact with the head 38 of the housing 46. Moreover, when the atmosphere about the spring assembly 30 is potentially harmful, such as corrosive vapors, it is beneficial to employ a protective sleeve (not shown) around the piston 48 as it extends through the head 38. The sleeve extends through the head 38 and the piston 48 can slide therein. The protective sleeve isolates the spring 50 from a harmful atmosphere.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/001771 | 10/18/2011 | WO | 00 | 7/3/2013 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61344845 | Oct 2010 | US |