This invention relates to downhole drilling assemblies, and more particularly, to a spring-operated anti-stall tool for controlling weight on-bit during drilling operations.
Coiled tubing drilling requires the use of a downhole positive displacement motor (PDM) to rotate the drill bit. During drilling operations, the unloaded PDM rotates at a constant RPM and achieves a “freespin” motor pressure, with respect to the fluid flow rate. As the drill bit encounters the bottom of the hole and force is transferred to the bit, referred to as weight-on-bit (WOB), the motor will sense an increase in torque. The increase in torque is a result of increased resistance to rotating at the constant RPM (assuming a constant flow rate). In turn, the PDM requires additional pressure to turn the motor at the constant RPM while under increased resistance. If the resistance increases to a condition which prohibits the PDM from rotating (i.e. excessive WOB), a motor stall is encountered. During a motor stall, the motor stops turning, the downhole fluid path is severely restricted, and the surface pump pressure dramatically increases. This event can eventually cause a motor failure, which requires the drilling process to be stopped, and the coiled tubing to be fatigue-cycled as the bit is pulled off bottom and run back into the hole to start drilling again.
A downhole tool that monitors motor pressure and sharply reduces the occurrence of motor stalls will increase overall drilling efficiency by:
(1) Increasing the average rate of penetration. This is achieved by reducing the occurrences of pulling off-bottom every time the motor stalls.
(2) Decreasing the damage to PDMs through repeated motor stalls, thereby decreasing occurrence of downhole failure.
(3) Decreasing the fatigue cycles on the coiled tubing. This increases the number of wells a coiled tubing string can service.
By achieving a more efficient drilling operation, the operators can substantially increase the cost savings of drilling a well.
The present invention provides an anti-stall tool that controls WOB during drilling operations, resulting in improved overall drilling efficiency.
Briefly, this invention comprises an anti-stall tool positioned in a downhole assembly near the bottom of the tubing adjacent a positive displacement motor (PDM) and the drill bit. In one embodiment, the tubing comprises a coiled tubing, although the tubing also can comprise rotary drilling tubing. The anti-stall tool controls the force applied to the drill bit during drilling to prevent the bit from stalling under load. The working pressure range of the PDM is sensed during use by a hydraulic valve control system and is used as an input to the controller. The controller alters weight-on-bit (WOB) if the downhole pressure goes beyond either end of the working pressure range of the system. The controller keeps the drill bit rotating by (1) maintaining WOB during normal drilling operations, (2) increasing WOB if sensed working pressure indicates that drill bit loading is low, and (3) reducing WOB which reduces PDM back-pressure to retract the drill bit from the bottom if excessive working pressure is sensed due to increased torque at the PDM.
The anti-stall tool generally comprises one or more hydraulic cylinders for applying an axial force either in a forward direction or a reverse direction. The controller comprises a system of hydraulic valves adapted to control piston force in either the forward or reverse directions. An active stage of the anti-stall tool reacts to the PDM producing low downhole pressures (e.g. below a pre-set low pressure) by actuating one or more of the pistons in the downhole direction to increase WOB which reduces PDM back-pressure. When the PDM is operating within its normal operating pressure range, the controller locks the pistons in a passive mode, in which the pistons are sealed and the anti-stall tool transfers force from the tubing to the drill bit. If the controller senses a pre-set high pressure or greater due to high torque at the PDM, the valve system reverses hydraulic flow to the pistons, which reduces WOB to force the drill bit away from the bottom to reduce PDM back-pressure.
One embodiment of the invention comprises an anti-stall method for controlling drilling operations in a downhole assembly which includes a tubing that extends downhole, a drill bit carried on the tubing, a positive displacement motor (PDM) for rotating the drill bit, and an anti-stall tool adjacent the PDM. The method comprises sensing pressure in the PDM, providing a range of operating pressures for the PDM defined by high and low limits of operating pressures, and operating the anti-stall tool in: (1) an active stage for increasing WOB forces in the downhole direction when the low limit of operating pressure is sensed, (2) a reverse stage for providing a WOB force in the reverse direction when the high limit of operating pressure is sensed, and (3) an optional passive stage in which the anti-stall tool is locked to transfer WOB directly from the tubing to the drill bit when the PDM is operating within the limits of its normal operating pressure range.
One embodiment of the invention comprises a spring-operated anti-stall tool adapted for use in a downhole assembly which comprises a tubing for extending downhole, a drill bit carried on the tubing, and a positive displacement motor (PDM) adjacent the drill bit for rotating the drill bit during drilling operations. A spring-operated anti-stall tool is carried on the tubing and positioned adjacent the PDM for preventing stalling of the PDM due to excessive loads on the drill bit. The spring-operated anti-stall tool comprises at least one piston in a cylinder having a forward piston area and a reverse piston area, and a controller comprising a hydraulic valve system for controlling operation of the piston. The forward piston area receives hydraulic fluid to produce a force in the downhole direction. The reverse piston area contains a load spring adapted to apply an upward spring force on the piston. The controller adjusts WOB in response to sensed PDM operating pressure. The controller inputs a desired range of operating pressures for the PDM, including an upper limit and a lower limit. The controller is adapted to: (1) supply hydraulic fluid to the forward piston area to increase WOB force in the downhole direction when operating pressure in the PDM surpasses the lower limit; this compresses the load spring as the piston moves in the downhole direction; (2) vent the piston volume in the forward piston area so the compressed spring will push the tool uphole, to reduce WOB when operating pressure in the PDM exceeds the upper limit; and (3) optionally lock the piston in a passive state when the PDM is operating within its normal operating pressure range.
These and other aspects of the invention will be more fully understood by referring to the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
The anti-stall tool 30 incorporates use of a series of hydraulic cylinders and as few as two pressure-actuated valves to control the applied weight-on-bit (WOB) while drilling. This tool will virtually create a real time, downhole motor pressure sensor that will alter the WOB to maintain a relatively constant drilling rate of penetration and provide feedback to the coiled tubing operator to adjust coiled tubing injector rates to match the PDM pressure.
The invention uses the working pressure range of the downhole positive displacement motor 28 to alter the WOB if the downhole pressure surpasses either end of the working range. During drilling operations, the AST will control the WOB through the use of three distinct operations: active WOB, passive WOB, and reverse.
The
In the description to follow, specific operating pressure set points or values are related to operative ranges for coiled tubing equipment. Use of the anti-stall tool in rotary drilling operations, for example, would involve use of different operating pressure ranges or control valve set points.
The first stage of the spring operated anti-stall tool 30 is activated when the unloaded PDM produces low downhole pressures. For example, if the PDM 20 creates a back pressure of 200 psi, the spring-operated tool will be in the active WOB stage. This causes pressure to be supplied to all pistons that will produce a force in the downhole direction (A1, A3A and possibly A3C). This will compress and load the springs with a spring force F1 and F2. As the WOB is applied, the normal reaction is for the PDM to generate more pressure. As the tool senses the increase in pressure to 250 psi (adjustable to specific motor requirements), the pressure reducing valve 36 will shut off additional flow to the pistons and hydraulically lock the pistons in the passive WOB stage.
In the passive WOB stage, the spring-operated tool transfers the force from the coil to the bit. The tool is acting as a rigid member and is monitoring the PDM back-pressure. The pressure reducing valve 36 is closed and is sealing the fluid in the pistons (A3A and possibly A3C) that produce a force in the downhole direction. All of the resultant pressure from the WOB is contained in the sealed piston volumes.
During the final stage of the spring-operated tool, the back pressure due to high torque in the PDM triggers the vent valve 38 to pull the bit off-bottom. Once the back pressure reaches 1,000 psi (adjustable to specific motor requirements), the vent valve 38 vents piston volumes A3A and A3C. The resultant force F1 and F2 of the compressed springs will push the tool uphole, reducing WOB and thereby reducing the PDM back-pressure. As the PDM back-pressure falls below the vent valve setting (including hysteresis), the tool will switch back to one of its other stages of operation.
The first stage of the hydraulic anti-stall tool is activated when the unloaded PDM produces low downhole pressures. For example, if the PDM creates a back pressure of 200 psi, the tool will be in the active WOB stage. This causes pressure to be supplied to all pistons that will produce a force in the downhole direction (A1, A3A and possibly A3C). As the WOB is applied, the normal reaction is for the PDM to generate more pressure. As the tool senses increase in pressure to 250 psi (adjustable to specific motor requirements), the pressure reducing valve 42 will shut off additional flow to the pistons and hydraulically lock the pistons in the passive WOB stage.
In the passive WOB stage, the hydraulic anti-stall tool transfers the force from the coiled tubing to the bit. The tool is acting as a rigid member and is monitoring the PDM back-pressure. The pressure reducing valve is closed and is sealing the fluid in the pistons (A3A and possibly A3C) that produce a force in the downhole direction. All of the resultant pressure from the WOB will be contained in the sealed piston volumes.
During the final stage of the hydraulic anti-stall tool, the back-pressure due to high torque in the PDM triggers the reverser valve 44 and vent valve 46 to reduce WOB. Once the back-pressure reaches 1,000 psi (adjustable to specific motor requirements), the reverser valve 44 switches the flow of fluid to the pistons that produce force in the uphole direction (A2, A3B, A3D). At the same time, the vent valve 46 vents the opposite side of those pistons. This allows the tool to travel uphole, reducing WOB and thereby reducing the PDM back-pressure. As the PDM back pressure falls below the reverser valve 44 setting (including hysteresis), the reverser valve 44 will switch back to its original position.
A difference between the tools shown in
The anti-stall tool operates as an open loop system. Drilling fluid from the surface is pumped down the bore in the tubing through the tool, to the motor for rotating the drill bit. Most of the fluid flow in the system is used for driving the drill bit. A small amount of the fluid is used for the controller and is jetted out to the sides and into the annulus during use.
The hydraulic anti-stall tool operates on piston area ratios and will work over a broader range of pressures. If the stroke of the tool is shortened, the overall length of this tool will be shorter than the spring-operated tool.
The anti-stall tool is designed to be in the fully expanded position at low pressures. This bias allows the tool to have the full length of stroke available to retract as much as needed until the PDM back-pressure reduces below the lower limit of the vent valve. The anti-stall tool will then try to fully expand, but the pressure may rise to the pressure control valve setting or higher and limit the expansion. Therefore, the long stroke length will allow several retraction steps before the stroke length is used up. The coiled tubing operator can adjust the input speed of the coiled tubing into the hole to prevent the anti-stall tool from fully retracting. The operator will see a change in pump pressure with each retraction to signal the need to reduce the coiled tubing input speed.
The anti-stall tool includes splines in a torque section 35 which contains an outer spline housing and splines contained internally on the piston housing. The splines allow the BHA to maintain its orientation relative to the motor and drill bit, without undesired twisting. The splines allow the tool to be used with a steerable BHA. Steerable BHAs can be controlled to drill the hole to a desired location, while changing the direction of the hole while drilling to achieve this goal. The splines allow the PDM and bit to maintain alignment with the orienting tools that would be uphole of the anti-stall tool. The torque load is transferred from the PDM across the outermost housings and across the spline of the anti-stall tool to the tools uphole of the anti-stall tool. The inner shafts do not see direct loading due to torque. The spline section functions in both the expansion and retraction of the anti-stall tool.
A key feature of the anti-stall tool is the single input necessary for the tool to operate. The tool need only sense and respond to the back-pressure created by the PDM. Stated another way, the anti-stall tool operates on constant (although adjustable) working pressure set points. The fixed set points can be fine-tuned to control the thresholds at which the control valves open and close, and as a result, drill bit penetration rate is more uniform.
An alternate embodiment of the invention comprises a two-phase anti-stall method for controlling drilling operations in a downhole assembly, which includes the tubing that extends downhole, the drill bit carried on the tubing, the positive displacement motor (PDM) for rotating the drill bit, and the spring-operated anti-stall tool adjacent the PDM. This method comprises sensing pressure in the PDM, providing a range of operating pressures for the PDM defined by high and low limits of operating pressures, and operating the anti-stall tool in: (1) an active stage increasing WOB forces in the downhole direction when the low limit of operating pressure is sensed, and (2) a reverse stage reducing WOB by actuating the load spring, when the high limit of operating pressure is sensed. Appropriate settings of the pressure reducing valve and vent valve can control the tool so as to shift between the active and reverse stages.
The anti-stall tool also can be operated by the two-phase method, combined with a passive range that operates (as described above) between a small range of pressure settings.
A further alternative embodiment of the invention comprises a hydraulic-operated system controller using a two-position/four-way valve described in a concurrently filed non-provisional application entitled “Anti-Stall Tool for Downhole Drilling Assemblies,” assigned to the same assignee as the present application, and naming Phillip Wayne Mock and Rudolph Ernst Krueger IV as joint inventors. This application is incorporated herein by this reference.
Different orifice adjustments can be used to control the speed at which the tool responds. In
As an alternative, WOB can be controlled by a combination of control valve settings and adjustments to orifice sizes.
The following are features of the present invention:
(1) Active WOB: The tool will reset into the fully extended position when the pressure falls below 300 psi. If a motor stall has occurred and the AST has pulled the bit off bottom, the active WOB stage will produce a minimum WOB and thrust the bit downhole until the PDM pressure exceeds 300 psi. (Pressures are dependent upon specific motor requirements.)
(2) Passive WOB: Shuts off the active WOB stage and allows the coiled tubing to transfer WOB to the bit. Prevents excessive WOB that can be developed as PDM pressure rises and acts on the pistons producing force downhole.
(3) Reverse: Reduces WOB to prevent motor stalls.
(4) Torque section transfers torque through the AST into the coiled tubing.
A downhole tool that monitors motor pressure and sharply reduces the occurrence of motor stalls will increase the overall drilling efficiency by:
By achieving a more efficient drilling operation, the operators can substantially increase the cost savings of drilling a well.
Although the invention has been described in connection with oil well drilling and use with a coiled tubing, the invention has other applications, including: jointed pipe, or rotary drilling; in operations besides drilling where it is useful to retract a tool at high pressures; or where adjustments to the drill bit are made to keep contact with the formation or to pick up the bit completely off the formation. Although the invention has been described with reference to a drill bit used in drilling oil wells in underground formations, the invention also may be used with other pressure-inducing tools such as high pressure jetting tools.
The anti-stall tool cylinders and valves may be manufactured from various corrosion-resistant materials including tungsten carbide, Inconel, high strength nickel alloyed steel such as MP35, beryllium-copper, and the like.
This application claims the priority date of U.S. Provisional Applications 61/009,972, filed Jan. 3, 2008, and 61/082,931, filed Jul. 23, 2008, which are incorporated herein in their entirety by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3233689 | Whittle | Feb 1966 | A |
3303894 | Varney | Feb 1967 | A |
3407886 | Bennett | Oct 1968 | A |
3675727 | Clark | Jul 1972 | A |
3799260 | Barrington | Mar 1974 | A |
4223746 | Tanguy et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4431064 | Bright | Feb 1984 | A |
4660656 | Warren et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4721172 | Brett et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4768598 | Reinhardt | Sep 1988 | A |
4936397 | McDonald et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5174392 | Reinhardt | Dec 1992 | A |
5311954 | Quintana | May 1994 | A |
5316094 | Pringle | May 1994 | A |
5368108 | Aldred et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368110 | French | Nov 1994 | A |
5372193 | French | Dec 1994 | A |
5394951 | Pringle et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5476421 | Moore et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5669457 | Sebastian et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5884716 | Beasley | Mar 1999 | A |
6102138 | Fincher | Aug 2000 | A |
6202762 | Fehr et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230813 | Moore et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230821 | Warren et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6467557 | Krueger et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6568485 | Falgout, Sr. | May 2003 | B2 |
6594881 | Tibbitts | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6736223 | Odell et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6758279 | Moore et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6962213 | Hartwick | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7036610 | Vail, III | May 2006 | B1 |
7100708 | Koederitz | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7114581 | Aronstam et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7139219 | Kolle et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7174975 | Krueger et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7677334 | Blount et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20010045300 | Fincher et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020007971 | Beaufort et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20040140131 | Susman | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20080202816 | Haughom et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080264689 | Blount et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090173540 | Mock et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 439 178 | Dec 2007 | GB |
324265 | Sep 2007 | NO |
WO 2004090278 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2006075921 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2008134263 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090173539 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61009972 | Jan 2008 | US | |
61082931 | Jul 2008 | US |