Spring steel with excellent resistance to hydrogen embrittlement and fatigue

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a spring steel useful as a material for the valve spring, suspension spring, stabilizer, torsion bar of the internal combustion engines of automobiles and the like; more specifically, the present invention relates to a spring steel generating a spring with excellent resistance to hydrogen embrittlement and good fatigue as significant spring properties.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The chemical compositions of spring steels are specified in JIS G3565 to 3567, 4801 and the like. By use of these spring steels, various springs are manufactured by the steps of: hot-rolling each spring steel into a hot-rolled wire rod or bar (hereinafter, referred to as "rolled material"); and drawing the rolled material to a specified diameter and then cold forming the wire into a spring after oil-tempering, or drawing the rolled material or peeling and straightening the rolled material, heating and forming the wire into a spring, and quenching and tempering it. Recently, there have been strong demands toward the characteristics of springs, and to meet these demands, alloy steels subjected to heat treatment have been extensively used as the materials of the springs.
On the other hand, there is a tendency in the field of automobile toward the enhancement of the stress of a spring as a part of measures of achieving lightweightness for reducing exhaust gas and fuel consumption. Namely, in the field of automobile, there is required a spring steel for a high strength spring which has a strength after quenching and tempering of 1,800 MPa or more. However, as the strength of a spring is enhanced, the sensitivity against defects is generally increased. In particular, the high strength spring used in a corrosion environment is deteriorated in corrosion fatigue life, and is fear of early causing the breakage.
One of the factors deteriorating the corrosion fatigue life includes hydrogen embrittlement due to the hydrogen generated following the progress of corrosive reaction. As a countermeasure for improving such phenomenon, a method comprising adding vast amounts of various alloy elements to a spring to give the spring a higher stress resistance, has been adopted. However, such method is economically problematic because the steel material is costly.
In order to suppress hydrogen embrittlement, it is effective that refining the grain size and dispersing fine precipitates such as carbides/nitrides. Therefor, carbides/nitrides forming elements has been added to steels. Addition of such elements improve the toughness of spring steels through the effect of refining the grain size, while it is wondered that coarse inclusions including carbides/nitrides deteriorate the fatigue life as one of most important properties of spring steels.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
With attention focused on the problems described above, the present invention has been carried out, and an object of the present invention is to provide a spring steel of a wire, a bar or a plate form, which can produce a spring (including valve springs, suspension springs, plate springs and the like) with high strength and high resistance of corrosion and hydrogen embrittlement.
To achieve the above object according to the present invention, there is provided a spring steel of high strength and excellent resistance to corrosion and hydrogen embrittlement containing Ti at 0.001 to 0.5 mass % (hereinafter referred to as %), Nb at 0.001 to 0.5%, Zr at 0.001 to 0.5%, Ta at 0.001 to 0.5% and Hf at 0.001 to 0.5%, and also contains N of 1 to 200 ppm and S of 5 to 300 ppm, wherein a great number of fine precipitates having an average particle size of less than 5 .mu.m and including carbides, nitrides, sulfides and their complex compounds (hereinafter referred to as "carbo-nitro-sulfides" which include carbides, nitrides, sulfides and their complex compounds), at least one element selected from the group consisting of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and Hf, are dispersed in the following testing area; testing area; cross section being defined by a region of a depth more than 0.3 mm from the surface not including the center part and having an area of 20 mm.sup.2.
Because "carbo-nitro-sulfides" as coarse inclusions having an average particle size of 5 .mu.m or more and including at least one element selected from the group consisting of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta, and Hf in the testing area adversely affect the fatigue life, the inclusions should be limited preferably in a manner so as to satisfy the following requirements, whereby a spring steel with more excellent resistance to hydrogen embrittlement and fatigue, can be obtained.
The size and number of coarse inclusions; the number of coarse inclusions of an average particle size of 5 to 10 .mu.m should be 500 or less; the number of coarse inclusions of an average particle size of more than 10 .mu.m to 20 .mu.m or less should be 50 or less; and the number of coarse inclusions of an average particle size of more than 20 .mu.m should be 10 or less.
When the above spring steel further contains 1.0% of V or less, V works as "carbo-nitro-sulfides" forming element. Then, in case of fine precipitates and coarse inclusions including at least one element selected from the group consisting of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta, Hf and V, satisfy the above requirements, the spring steel can possibly enhance its performance.
In accordance with the present invention, furthermore, the spring steel should preferably have an prior austenite grain diameter of 20 .mu.m or less after quenching and tempering, an HRC hardness of 50 or more and a fracture toughness value (KIC) of 40 MPam.sup.1/2 or more, so as to greatly enhance properties as spring steel such as toughness, durability, sag resistance and the like.
The spring steel of the present invention is essentially characterized in that the type, size and number of "carbo-nitro-sulfides" should be regulated as described above, and that other elements contained therein are not with specific limitation. Preferable elements contained and elements to be eliminated are as follows. The reason why the preferable contents of the individual elements are determined will be described later in detail.
(1) At least one element selected from the group consisting of Ni at 3.0% or less (preferably 0.05 to 3.0%), Cr at 5.0% or less (preferably, 0.05 to 5.0%), Mo at 3.0% or less (preferably, 0.05 to 3.0%) and Cu at 1.0% or less (preferably, 0.01 to 1.0%).
(2) At least one element selected from the group consisting of Al at 1.0% or less (preferably, 0.005 to 1.0%), B of 50 ppm or less (preferably, 1 to 50 ppm), Co at 5.0% or less (preferably, 0.01 to 5.0%) and W at 1.0% or less (preferably, 0.01 to 1.0%).
(3) At least one element selected from the group consisting of Ca of 200 ppm or less (preferably, 0.1 to 200 ppm), La at 0.5% or less (preferably, 0.001 to 0.5%), Ce at 0.5% or less (preferably, 0.001 to 0.5%) and Rem at 0.5% or less (preferably, 0.01 to 0.5%).
(4) The steel preferably contains C in the range from 0.3% to 0.7%, Si at 0.1 to 4.0% and Mn at 0.005 to 2.0% as the essential components, with the balance being essentially Fe and inevitable impurities.
(5) The inevitable impurities in the steel include P at 0.02% or less; other impurities contained therein are Zn of preferably 60 ppm or less, Sn of preferably 60 ppm or less, As of preferably 60 ppm or less and Sb of preferably 60 ppm or less; the steel further satisfying the following formula (1) as required can enhance its performance as a spring steel;
2.5.ltoreq.(FP).ltoreq.4.5 (1)
where FP=(0.23 �C!+0.1).times.(0.7�Si!+1).times.(3.5�Mn!+1).times.(2.2�Cr!+1).times.(0.4�Ni!+1).times.(3�Mo!+1 in which �element! represents mass % of each element.
MODE OF CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
So as to prevent the decrease of the toughness of a spring steel with the increase of the strength, refining prior austenite grain size has been adopted conventionally. From such respect, various methods to increase toughness with fine grains by adding elements generating carbides and/or nitrides into steels have been proposed.
In the field of spring steel, however, the concept to limit the size of carbides and nitrides from the respect of improving the hydrogen embrittlement has not been proposed. As has been described above or as will be described in detail hereinbelow, it has been found that the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement of a spring steel can be enhanced markedly when an appropriate amount of at least one element selected from the group consisting of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and Hf is contained in the spring steel to generate fine precipitates of "carbo-nitro-sulfides".
The reason is considered as follows. The hydrogen embrittlement of a spring steel possibly may be due to the occurrence of brittle fracture at a prior austenite grain boundary where the hydrogen penetrated into the steel is diffused and decreased the bonding energy. The fine precipitates of "carbo-nitro-sulfides" containing the elements mentioned above, trap the hydrogen penetrated into the inside of the steel, whereby the hydrogen embrittlement may be suppressed potentially. Adversely, there are some fear that the inclusions may become coarse when the elements forming the "carbo-nitro-sulfides" are added, and the resulting coarse inclusions may possibly cause early fracture.
As a technique to improve spring steels with attention focused on the coarse inclusions of oxides, a method controlling the composition of oxide inclusions in a valve spring steel has been proposed, whereby the ductility of the oxide inclusions is increased to achieve the improvement of the toughness, on the basis of the finding that cracking starts from inclusions having an average particle size of about 30 .mu.m or more and being around near the surface. As the progress in the technique which makes oxide inclusions harmless described above, however, the problem of early fracture due to the inclusions of Ti nitrides instead of oxides, in particular, has been remarked. Research works to eliminate any Ti source among steel production process have made progress in recent years. It is not satisfactory for achieving higher stress resistance and higher tensile strength to adopt the technique that makes oxides inclusions harmless as described above. It is necessary to improve resistance to hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion.
In order to improve corrosion resistance, the addition of vast amounts of alloy metals is the most effective method, but the method is economically disadvantageous because the materials are costly and another production process such as annealing should be essentially needed. However, when a small amount of at least one or more selected elements from the group consisting of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and Hf is added to the spring steel as described above, thereby forming fine precipitates of "carbo-nitro-sulfides" including their elements and having an average particle size of less than 5 .mu.m and being finely dispersed, the effect of trapping diffusive hydrogen is exerted to increase the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement.
The increase of the amount of coarse inclusions by adding a large amount of these elements may potentially lead to shorter fatigue life and lower toughness which is caused by coarse inclusions working as the fracture origin. Therefore, further investigations have been made to suppress shortening the fatigue life, due to coarse inclusions as the origin of fatigue fracture, while keeping the effect of improving the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement by the addition of the elements described above. Then, it has been found that the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement can be markedly enhanced with no occurrence of the deterioration of the fatigue life and toughness which deterioration is due to "carbo-nitro-sulfides" including the elements mentioned before as the origin of fatigue fracture, by controlling the cooling rate during the solidification process for casting a spring steel, thereby regulating the size and number of the "carbo-nitro-sulfides".
The reasons of the limitation of the inclusions in accordance with the present invention will be described in detail.
In accordance with the present invention, fine precipitates of "carbo-nitro-sulfides" including at least one element selected from the group consisting of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and Hf, should be formed for trapping diffusive hydrogen, and such effect of trapping diffusive hydrogen is efficiently exerted by the fine precipitates of an average particle size of less than 5 .mu.m; even such "carbo-nitro-sulfides" cannot have the effect of improving the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement as intended in accordance with the present invention, if they are coarse inclusions of an average particle size above 5 .mu.m. More specifically, super-fine precipitates in size of 10 nm to 5 .mu.m efficiently work for the improvement of the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement with no adverse effect on the fatigue life. Hence, such precipitates can markedly enhance the overall properties as a spring steel.
This may be because the finely dispersed precipitates can trap diffusive hydrogen in the spring steel whereby the hydrogen embrittlement due to diffusive hydrogen is suppressed. On contrast, coarse inclusions massively trap diffusive hydrogen, which may adversely enhance the hydrogen embrittlement. In order that the fine precipitates can effectively exert improving the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement, in any way, the "carbo-nitro-sulfides" consisting of the elements should be as fine as those of an average particle size of less than 5 .mu.m. Coarse inclusions whose average particle size is larger than 5 .mu.m, do not only exert the improving effects of the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement, but deteriorate fatigue life, because they work as the origin of fatigue fracture.
Furthermore, the fine precipitates of "carbo-nitro-sulfides" described above, having an average particle size of less than 5 .mu.m, which contribute to the improvement of the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement, can efficiently exert the effect as the size thereof is smaller while the number thereof is greater. It is currently confirmed that improving the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement through the effect of trapping diffusive hydrogen can be efficiently exerted if the number of the finely dispersed precipitates present in a testing face is 1,000 or more, preferably 5,000 or more and most preferably 10,000 or more. Additionally, such fine precipitates never work as a fatigue fracture origin determining fatigue life. Herein, the term "average particle size of the precipitates" means the value of (the long diameter+the short diameter)/2, and the ratio of the long diameter to the short diameter of the precipitates is 3.0 or less.
If the "carbo-nitro-sulfides" present in a testing face being defined by a region at a depth of 0.3 mm or more from the cross sectional surface of the spring steel with no center included and having an area of 20 mm.sup.2 are of larger sizes, they adversely influence the effect of improving the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement; additionally, they work as an origin of fatigue fracture to significantly affect the fatigue life as a spring steel, adversely. So as to demonstrate the quantitative standard, investigations have been made of the size and number of the coarse inclusions. Consequently, it has been found that only if cooling conditions and the like during casting are satisfactorily controlled so that coarse inclusions of the "carbo-nitro-sulfides" having an average particle size of 5 .mu.m or more might meet the following requirements, the adverse effect of the coarse inclusions on the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement and the fatigue can be suppressed to such an extent as negligible in a
practical sense;
size and number of coarse inclusions;
number of inclusions of an average particle size of 5 to 10 .mu.m should be 500 or less;
number of inclusions of an average particle size of more than 10 .mu.m to 20 .mu.m or less should be 50 or less; and
number of inclusions of an average particle size of more than 20 .mu.m is 10 or less.
In accordance with the present invention, therefore, the "carbo-nitro-sulfides" of a size above 5 .mu.m should be controlled so that the size and number thereof might meet the aforementioned requirements. Because the "carbo-nitro-sulfides" tend to be precipitated at a higher temperature of 1400.degree. to 1500.degree. C. and gradually grow coarsely at the subsequent cooling process, the cooling rate during casting should be increased to preferably 0.1.degree. C./second or more, and more preferably 0.5.degree. C./second or more, to suppress to form coarse inclusions as much as possible.
In accordance with the present invention, thus, an infinite number, specifically 1,000 or more, preferably 5,000 or more, and further more preferably 10,000 or more of the fine precipitates of the "carbo-nitro-sulfides" having an average particle size of less than 5 .mu.m should be precipitated in their dispersed state in the steel, whereby the effect of trapping diffusive hydrogen is efficiently exerted to procure the distinctive improvement of the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement. Because the coarse inclusions of the "carbo-nitro-sulfides" having an average particle size of 5 .mu.m or more cannot have the effect of improving the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement through the trapping of diffusive hydrogen or such inclusions adversely affect the fatigue life as the inclusions work as the origin of fatigue fracture, furthermore, inclusions of an average particle size of 5 to 10 .mu.m should be suppressed to a number of 500 or less (more preferably, 300 or less); inclusions of an average particle size of more than 10 .mu.m to 20 .mu.m or less should be suppressed to a number of 50 or less (more preferably, 30 or less); and inclusions of an average particle size of more than 20 .mu.m should be suppressed to a number of 10 or less (more preferably, 5 or less, and most preferably, substantially zero), as described above. Thus, a spring steel with excellent resistance to hydrogen embrittlement and fatigue can be achieved.
The reason why the chemical components of the steel to be used in accordance with the present invention should be defined will be described below.
The steel to be used in accordance with the present invention should contain at least one selected from the group consisting of Ti at 0.001 to 0.5%, Nb at 0.001 to 0.5%, Zr at 0.001 to 0.5%, Ta at 0.001 to 0.5% and Hf at 0.001 to 0.5%, as metal elements to form the fine "carbo-nitro-sulfides" as described above, wherein the N content should be controlled within the range of 1 to 200 ppm while the S content should be controlled within the range of 10 to 300 ppm.
Any element selected from the group consisting of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and Hf can form "carbo-nitro-sulfides", and is an essential elements to precipitate "carbo-nitro-sulfides" inside the grain or in the grain boundary in the spring steel, which trap diffusive hydrogen as a factor causing hydrogen embrittlement thereby increasing the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement. Additionally, the formed "carbo-nitro-sulfides" can make prior austenite grain size finer, and increase of the toughness and sag resistance. In order that such effects can be exerted efficiently, at least one of the five elements should be contained at 0.001% or more, more preferably 0.005% or more. If the contents thereof are too excess, however, the amount of "carbo-nitro-sulfides" inclusions generated during a solidification process for casting are too much, and along with the increase of the number, the inclusions adversely affects the fatigue life, significantly. Hence, the contents should be 0.5% or less, preferably 0.2% or less, individually.
In order that N and S may form nitrides together with the five elements described above to efficiently trap diffusive hydrogen and exert the effect of refining austenite grain, N should be contained at 1 ppm at least or more, preferably 5 ppm, more preferably 10 ppm; S should be contained at 5 ppm or more, and preferably 10 ppm or more. If the contents are too excess, however, the size and number of the "carbo-nitro-sulfides" inclusions are increased to adversely affect the fatigue life. Thus, N should be suppressed to 200 ppm or less, preferably 100 ppm or less, and most preferably 70 ppm; and S should be suppressed to 300 ppm or less, preferably 200 ppm or less and more preferably 150 ppm or less.
Other elements contained in the steel to be used in accordance with the present invention are without specific limitation, but preferable ones will be described below, in terms of securing the generally required performance as spring steel or in terms of further enhancing the properties.
In accordance with the present invention, firstly, V should be contained at about 0.005% or more, and preferably 0.01% or more, as an element forming "carbo-nitro-sulfides", other than the element selected from the group consisting of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and Hf. In other words, an appropriate amount of V can form fine precipitates of "carbo-nitro-sulfides" to exert the effects of further enhancing the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement and the fatigue life, and to additionally exert the effect of refining prior austenite grain size to increase the toughness and proof stress, together with the contribution to the improvement of the corrosion resistance and sag resistance. If the amount is too much, however, the amount of carbides not to be resolved into austenite during heating for austenitization is increased with the result that satisfactory strength and hardness can hardly be attained. Thus, the content should be suppressed to 1.0% or less, more preferably 0.5% or less.
In the steel containing V, additionally, the fine precipitates and inclusions of the "carbo-nitro-sulfides" including Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta, Hf and V, should totally satisfy the size and number described above.
The essential components of the spring steel in accordance with the present invention are three elements of C, Si and Mn as described below, with the remaining part thereof substantially comprising Fe. Their preferable contents are as follows. C; 0.3% or more to less than 0.7%
C is an element essentially contained in steel, and contributes to the increase of the strength (hardness) after quenching and tempering. If the C content is 0.3% or less, then, the strength (hardness) after quenching and tempering is unsatisfactory; if the content is 0.7% or more, alternatively, the toughness and ductility after quenching and tempering is deteriorated and additionally, the corrosion resistance is adversely affected. From the respect of the strength and toughness required for spring steel, more preferably C content is from 0.3 to 0.55%; so as to more certainly improve the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion fatigue, the content is preferably within a range of 0.30 to 0.50%. Si: 0.1 to 4.0%
Si is an essential element for solid solution strengthening. When the Si content is less than 0.1%, the strength of the matrix after quenching and tempering becomes insufficient. When the Si content is more than 4.0%, the solution of carbides becomes insufficient during heating for quenching, and higher temperature is required for the uniform austenitizing, which excessively accelerates the decarbonization on the surface, thereby deteriorating the fatigue life of a spring. The Si content is preferably in the range from 1.0 to 3.0%. Mn: 0.005 to 2.0%
Different effects may be expected from Mn when added at an amount of 0.005% or more to less than 0.05% and at an amount of 0.05% or more to 2.0% or less. Firstly, the lower limit of Mn is defined from the respect of refining efficiency at a practical scale production. Because long-term refining is needed so as to decrease the Mn content to less than 0.005%, leading to the marked increase of the cost, the lower limit should be defined as described above on the practical reason.
When the Mn content is defined within a range of 0.005% or more to less than 0.05%, other elements improving hardenability (for example, Cr, Ni, Mo, etc.) should be contained sufficiently (at about 0.5% or more) in the steel. If the hardenable elements are added to steels excessively, supercooling structure will be observed in their microstructure. In such case, the Mn content suppressed to less than 0.05% is preferable because hard supercooling structure are hardly formed, which readily promotes cold formability such as wire drawing and which also suppresses the formation of coarse MnS frequently working as a fracture origin. The Mn content is defined within a range of 0.05% or more to 2.0% or less if elements to improve hardenability of the steel are at lower levels (about 0.5% or less). So as to actively enhance the hardenability, Mn should be contained at 0.05% or more. If the Mn content is excessive, however, the hardenability of steel is too much increased to readily generate supercooling structures. Thus, the upper limit of Mn addition should be 2.0%. The formation of MnS working as a fracture origin may then exist potentially, so that MnS should preferably be generated as less as possible, through the decrease of S content or the combination of adding other sulfide forming elements (Ti, Zr, etc.).
For the purpose of improving corrosion resistance on the following reason, it is effective for one or more elements among
Cr, Ni, Mo, V, and Cu to be contained in the spring steel.
Cr: 5.0% or less (preferably, 0.05 to 5.0%)
Cr is an element to make amorphous and dense the rust produced on the surface layer in a corrosive environment thereby improving the corrosion resistance, and to improve the hardenability like Mn. To achieve these functions, Cr must be added in an amount of 0.05% or more. But if Cr is added excessively above 5.0%, carbides are hardly dissolved during heating for quenching, to adversely affect the strength and hardness. More preferable Cr content is within the range of 0.1 to 2.0%. Ni: 3.0% or less (preferably, 0.05 to 3.0%)
Ni is an element for enhancing the toughness of the material after quenching and tempering, making amorphous and dense the produced rust thereby improving the corrosion resistance, and improving the sag resistance as one of important spring characteristics. To achieve these functions, Ni must be added 0.05% or more, preferably, 0.1% or more. When the Ni content is more than 3.0%, the hardenability is excessively increased, and a supercooling structure is easily generated after rolling. The Ni content is preferably in the range from 0.1 to 1.0%.
Mo: 3.0% or less (preferably, 0.05 to 3.0%)
Mo is an element for improving the hardenability, and enhancing the corrosion resistance due to the absorption of molybdate ion produced in corrosive solution. Furthermore, Mo has an effect to increase the intergranular strength thereby improving the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement. These effects are efficiently exhibited at a content of 0.05% or more, preferably 0.1% or more. Because these effects are saturated at about 3.0%, however, further more addition is economically useless.
Cu: 1.0% or less (preferably, 0.01 to 1.0%)
Cu is an element being electrochemically noble more than Fe, and has a function to enhance the corrosion resistance. To achieve this function, Cu must be added in an amount of 0.01% or more. However, even when the Cu content is more than 1.0%, the effect is saturated, or rather, there occurs a fear of causing the embrittlement of the material during hot rolling. The Cu content is preferably in the range from 0.1 to 0.5%.
The following elements are included as other preferable elements to be contained, and the effects of the individual elements added may be exerted efficiently. At least one selected from the group consisting of Al, B, Co and W
Any element of them can contribute to the improvement of the sag resistance through the increase of the toughness; additionally, Al refines grain size to improve the proof stress ratio; B has an effect to improve the hardenability to increase the intergranular strength; Co and W increase the strength and hardness after quenching and tempering; still additionally, B makes more dense rust generated on the surface, to improve the corrosion resistance; W forms tungstate ions in a corrosive solution to contribute to the improvement of the corrosion resistance. The effects of these elements are effectively exhibited at about 0.005% or more of Al, about 1 ppm or more of B, at about 0.01% or more of Co and about 0.01% or more of W. If Al is above 1.0%, however, the amount of oxide inclusions generated is increased and the size thereof is also coarse, both of which adversely affect the fatigue life; because the aforementioned effects of added B and Co are saturated at about 50 ppm and 5.0%, respectively, further addition thereof is economically useless; when W is above 1.0%, alternatively, the toughness of the steels material is adversely affected. From these respects, more preferable contents of the elements are within the following ranges; Al at 0.01 to 0.5%, B of5 to 30 ppm, Co at 0.5 to 3.0%, and W at 0.1 to 0.5%.
One or more of Ca, La, Ce and Rem
Any one of these elements contributes to the improvement of the corrosion resistance; Ca further is a forcibly deoxidizing element, and has a function to refine oxide based inclusions in steel and to contribute to the improvement of the toughness. The effect of improving the corrosion resistance is considered as follows: namely, when the corrosion of a steel proceeds, in a corrosion pit as the starting point of the corrosion fatigue, there occurs the following reaction:
Fe.fwdarw.Fe.sup.2+ +2e.sup.-
Fe.sup.2+ +2H.sub.2 O.fwdarw.Fe(OH).sub.2 +2H.sup.+
The interior of the corrosion pit is thus made acidic, and to keep the electric neutralization, Cl.sup.-1 ions are collected therein from the exterior. As a result, the liquid in the corrosion pit made severely corrosive, which accelerates the growth of the corrosion pit. When appropriate amount of Ca, La, Ce and Rem are present in steel, they are dissolved in the liquid within the corrosion pit together with steel. However, since they are basic elements, the liquid thereof are made basic, to neutralize the liquid in the corrosion pit, thus significantly suppressing the growth of the corrosion pit as the starting point of the corrosion fatigue. To achieve this function, these outcome may be facilitated when the steel contains Ca of 0.1 ppm or more, and La, Ce and Rem at 0.001% or more, and more reliably 0.005% or more. When Ca is above 200 ppm, however, the refractory materials of the converter are severely damaged during steel refining; additionally, the effects of La, Ce and Rem are individually saturated at their individual contents of about 0.1%. Thus, any more addition thereof is useless, economically.
Because P as an impurity inevitably contaminated into steel, segregate to grain boundaries to decrease the grain boundary strength thereby causing intergranular fracture, P should be suppressed to about 0.02% or less. Furthermore, Zn, Sn, As and Sb as other impurities which occasionally may be contaminated into steel, similarly segregate to grain boundaries to decrease intergranular strength and tend to enhance hydrogen embrittlement thereby. Therefore, all of these elements should be suppressed to about 60 ppm or less individually.
Additionally, the elements of the spring steel to be used in accordance with the present invention should preferably satisfy the requirement of the following formula (I) in addition to the requirement of the contents of the individual contents. More specifically, the hydrogen embrittlement in a spring steel occurs due to the penetration of diffusive hydrogen into the grain boundaries, and the penetration of diffusive hydrogen adversely affects the corrosion resistance of the steel. It is then confirmed that the corrosion resistance of itself is improved by appropriate amounts of Cr, Ni, Mo, Cu, etc. contained in the steel but the material cost up due to the addition of greater amounts of these alloying elements and the processing cost up due to additional treatment such as annealing of rolled materials due to the increasing of hardenability, cannot be neglected. When the contents of C, Si, Mn, Cr, Ni and Mo in the steel are to be adjusted so that their contents may satisfy the relationship defined by the following formula (I), however, a spring steel containing smaller amounts of these alloying elements and having very excellent corrosion resistance may be produced without any annealing process for rolled materials.
2.5.ltoreq.(FP).ltoreq.4.5 (1)
(wherein FP=(0.23�C!+0.1).times.(0.7�Si!+1).times.(3.5�Mn!+1).times.(2.2�Cr!+1).times.(0.4�Ni!+1).times.(3�Mo!+1), provided that �element! represents mass % of each element.)
If the FP value described above is less than 2.5, uniform hardening is hardly attained, involving difficulty in securing higher strength certainly; if the value is above 4.5, alternatively, supercooling structure may appear in microstructure of the steels after hot rolling so that the strength after pressing is 1300 MPa or more. Thus, annealing process is inevitable in drawing process, leading to the increase of the number of processes. If the contents of individual elements contained are to be adjusted so as to satisfy the relationship of the aforementioned formula (I), however, uniform hardening microstructure is attained during quenching and tempering to stabilize the higher strength with no appearance of supercooling structure in the hot rolled microstructure, whereby the strength is not enhanced excessively. Therefore, drawing process can be carried out without any softening process such as annealing process.
When the spring steel with the chemical composition described above into a suspension spring, the slabs are hot rolled into wire rods, which is then processed with quenching and tempering or which is subsequently subjected to oil tempering process to be adjusted to a given wire hardness (tensile strength) prior to processing into spring. Preferably, then, the prior austenite grain size is to be adjusted to 20 .mu.m or less (more preferably, 15 .mu.m or less); the hardness is to be adjusted to HRC 50 or more (more preferably, 52 or more); and the fracture toughness KIC is to be adjusted to 40 MPam.sup.1/2 or more (more preferably, 50 MPam.sup.1/2).
In those spring steels with a prior austenite grain size of 20 .mu.m or less, therefore, the "carbo-nitro-sulfides" generating in the grain boundaries are so extremely fine that they can efficiently exert the function as a diffusive hydrogen trapping sites with almost no influence over the toughness and fatigue life. So as to obtain such fine austenite grain size, the conditions of the heating process for austenitization should satisfactorily be adjusted appropriately.
So as to secure satisfactory durability and sag resistance as a high-strength suspension spring and the like, wire rod hardness after quenching and tempering is also important. So as to secure satisfactory durability and sag resistance as suspension spring, the wire after quenching and tempering should have a hardness of HRC 50 or more and a fracture toughness value of 40 MPam.sup.1/2. Less than HRC 50, the durability and sag resistance should be likely to be poor; and if the fracture toughness value is less than 40 MPam.sup.1/2, satisfactory resistance to hydrogen embrittlement cannot be exerted through lower toughness. Generally taking account of durability, sag resistance, resistance to hydrogen embrittlement and the like, more preferable hardness is HRC 52 or more; and more preferable fracture toughness is 50 MPam.sup.1/2 or more.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Examples will now be described in accordance with the present invention, but the invention is never limited to the following examples. Within the scopes as described above and below, modification and variation will be possible to carry out the invention. These modifications and variations are also included in the technical scope of the present invention.
EXAMPLE 1
Melting steels Nos.1 to 102 of the chemical components as shown in Tables 1 to 6 and subsequently casting the materials by ingot-making or by continuous casting, and preparing then billets of a 115-mm square by blooming, the billets were further processed into wire rods of a diameter of 14 mm by hot rolling. Each wire rod was drawn to a diameter of 12.5 mm, followed by quenching and tempering, to prepare a test piece for fracture toughness, a test piece for hydrogen embrittlement, a test piece for rotary bending corrosion fatigue, and a test piece for rotary bending fatigue. The conditions for tempering were adjusted so that the hardness might be HRC 53 to 55 within 350.degree. to 450.degree. C. for an hour.
The test piece for fracture toughness was a CT test piece, preliminarily introduced with fatigue crack of a length of about 3 mm. The test was carried out at room temperature in atmosphere, by using a 10-ton autograph tensile tester. The corrosion fatigue test was carried out by a process comprising dropwise adding an aqueous 5% NaCl solution at 35.degree. C. into the test piece. All of the test pieces were shot peened under the same conditions at a stress of 784 MPa and a rotation of 100 rpm. The test of hydrogen embrittlement was carried out by dipping test pieces in a mixture solution of 0.5 mol/l H2SO4 and 0.01 mol/l KSCN (potassium rhodanate), through the bending of the piece at four points during cathode charge and applying a voltage at -700 mV vs SCE using a potentiostat. The stress was a bending stress at 1400 MPa. The rotary bending fatigue test was carried out after the test pieces were shot-peened under the same conditions. The testing stress was 881 MPa and 10 specimens were tested for each steel. The test was suspended at 1.0.times.10.sup.7 times.
Further, EPMA (Electron Probe Micro Analyzer) was used to measure the size and number of the "carbo-nitro-sulfides" of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta, Hf and V. More specifically, automatically operating EPMA so as to cover a testing surface area (long side/short side=5, the long side be in contact to a part of a 0.3-mm depth from the surface layer) of 20 MM.sup.2 inside the 0.3-mm depth from the surface of the longitudinal section (passing through the center line) of a rotary bending test piece to count all inclusions therein, the size of inclusions whose average particle size of 3 .mu.m or more were measured and elements of them were analyzed. For precipitates of an average particle size of less than 3 .mu.m, furthermore, the specimens after hydrogen embrittlement test was used to identify the elements of the precipitates under 20 the observation areas in total, for each steel, using EPMA and Auger Electron Analyzer; concurrently, the size and number thereof were measured by photography (1,000 to 20,000 magnification); the number was corrected for a testing surface area of 20 mm.sup.2.
Tables 1, 3, 5 and 6 show the compositions of the steels of the present invention; Tables 2 and 4 show the compositions of the steels of Comparative Examples; and Tables 7 to 12 show the results of the tests.
Tables 1 to 12 indicate what will be described below.
Examples of Nos.1 to 24, 44 to 70 and 90 to 102, satisfying all the requirements defined in accordance with the present invention, show good results in terms of any of resistance to hydrogen embrittlement, corrosion fatigue and fatigue. The Examples are far more excellent, compared with Comparative Examples of Nos. 25, 26, 27, 71, 72 and 73, with no Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and Hf contained therein.
Among the Examples, those containing an appropriate amount of V show excellent results in terms of any of resistance to hydrogen embrittlement, corrosion fatigue and fatigue, compared with other Examples with no V contained therein. Steel (Nos. 4 to 24, 47 to 70) with the C contents within the most appropriate range of 0.30 to 0.50% have higher fracture toughness and longer hydrogen embrittlement cracking life. Even among those with the main contained elements satisfying the defined requirements, Comparative Examples (Nos. 31, 32, 77, and 78) with higher contents of P and S, or Zn, Sn, As, Sb, etc. which cause the size and number of coarse inclusions outside the preferable requirement, can hardly exhibit the effect of improving the hydrogen embrittlement cracking life.
From the respect of corrosion durability, those containing appropriate amounts of Ni, Cr and Mo as in Nos. 4 to 8, and 47 to 51 acquire far excellent corrosion fatigue life compared with Examples of Nos.1, 2, and 44 to 46 with no such elements contained therein. Furthermore, steels (Nos. 9 to 12, and 52 to 55) with appropriate amounts of Al, B, Co and W actively added therein so as to improve the strength and toughness, have the same performance from the respect of any of resistance of hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion fatigue life, as those of steels of Nos. 4 and 47 and the like. Steel materials (Nos. 13 to 16, and 56 to 59) with appropriate amounts of Ca, La, Ce and Rem added therein so as to improve corrosion resistance, have apparently improved corrosion fatigue life, compared with steels (Nos. 5, 47, and the like) never containing them.
With respect to the influences of the size and number of precipitates, those satisfying the preferable requirements of the present invention cause no break origined inclusions at fatigue tests, which indicates no adverse effect on fatigue life. On contrast, greater amounts of coarse inclusions are generated by the slower cooling rate during solidification in Comparative Examples Nos. 28 to 30 and 74 to 76, where the probability of fracture due to the coarse inclusions is so high that the fatigue life is extremely shortened.
With respect to the principal elements, C, Si and Mn, in steel, it is indicated that those with slight shortage of C contents (Nos. 33 and 79) have more or less low strength after quenching and tempering; and that those with too higher C contents (Nos. 34 and 80) tend to adversely have lower fracture toughness and deteriorated hydrogen embrittlement cracking life. In Nos. 35 and 81 with some shortage of Si, the hardness is slightly poor; in Nos. 36 and 82 with too much Si, the toughness is slightly low. In any of these Examples, the hydrogen embrittlement cracking life is likely to be not enough. If a constant amount of Cr is maintained, additionally, a steel with higher cold formability can be produced by suppressing addition of Mn to a lower level (Nos. 96 to 102). Those with higher contents of Mn, Ni, Cr and Mo (Nos. 38 to 41 and 84 to 87) tend to demonstrate lower hardness due to the presence of a lot of retained austenite. In Comparative Examples (Nos. 42, 43, 88 and 89) wherein the N and S contents are outside the defined requirements, the number of coarse inclusions of "carbo-nitro-sulfides" is increased, which indicates that the deterioration of fatigue life and the like is significant.
In Examples with FP values within the preferable range (Nos. 1, 3 to 5, 9, 10, 13 to 24, 44, 47, 48, 52, 53, 56-70) in accordance with the present invention, direct drawing process is possible with no need of annealing after rolling, whereby the simplification of the production process and cost saving can be achieved. In Examples (Nos. 1 to 5, 49 to 51, etc.) with contents of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta, Hf, N and S within more preferable range, stable performance can be achieved from the respect of resistance to hydrogen embrittlement, corrosion durability and fatigue; in Examples (Nos. 17, 20, 60, 63 and 66) with slight shortage of these elements compared with their preferable range, the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement is more or less lower; in Examples (Nos. 18, 19, 21, 22, 61, 62, 64, 65, 67, 68) with greater contents of them, adversely, the fatigue life has lower values. Compared with Comparative Examples, however, these Examples have far more excellent resistance to hydrogen embrittlement and fatigue.
The present invention as described above can provide a spring steel with higher strength, higher stress resistance, excellent resistance to hydrogen embrittlement and fatigue, characterized in that the spring steel is produced by making a spring steel contain an appropriate amount of at least one or more of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta, and Hf, thereby generating fine inclusions of the "carbo-nitro-sulfides" thereof to make the inclusions exert the effect of trapping diffusive hydrogen whereby the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement is enhanced, wherein the size and number of the coarse inclusions of the "carbo-nitro-sulfides" are regulated, thereby suppressing the decrease of the fatigue life.
TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________ Chemical components (mass %) other FP Necessity ofSteel types C Si Mn Cu Ni Cr Mo V Ti Nb N ppm S ppm component value annealing__________________________________________________________________________Inventive steel 1 0.60 2.01 0.85 0 0 0.15 0 0 0.041 0 71 102 -- 3.1 not necessaryInventive steel 2 0.54 1.49 0.85 0 0 0.74 0 0 0.049 0 92 111 -- 4.9 necessaryInventive steel 3 0.42 1.71 0.20 0.21 0.35 1.10 0 0.15 0.050 0 45 62 -- 2.9 not necessaryInventive steel 4 0.42 1.72 0.21 0.20 0.35 1.09 0 0.14 0.051 0 12 48 -- 3.0 not necessaryInventive steel 5 0.44 1.65 0.19 0 0.40 0.90 0 0.20 0.042 0.031 42 53 -- 2.5 not necessaryInventive steel 6 0.40 2.49 0.42 0 1.82 0.91 0.48 0.20 0.050 0 42 69 -- 16.8 necessaryInventive steel 7 0.35 2.49 0.39 0 2.30 2.92 0.40 0.20 0 0.067 59 82 -- 37.4 necessaryInventive steel 8 0.35 2.49 0.40 0 1.02 2.92 1.52 0 0.059 0 32 52 -- 70.4 necessaryInventive steel 9 0.42 1.69 0.19 0 0.34 1.09 0 0 0.062 0 49 57 Al: 0.03% 2.8 not necessaryInventive steel 10 0.42 1.71 0.20 0 0.33 1.05 0 0.15 0.051 0 44 45 B: 15 ppm 2.8 not necessaryInventive steel 11 0.40 1.81 0.93 0 0.35 0.75 0.35 0 0 0.088 55 32 Co: 0.70% 11.7 necessaryInventive steel 12 0.41 1.76 0.83 0.58 0.38 0.60 0.40 0 0 0.049 79 66 W: 0.21% 10.2 necessaryInventive steel 13 0.42 1.75 0.20 0 0.42 0.91 0 0.20 0.052 0 49 32 Ca: 12 ppm 2.7 not necessaryInventive steel 14 0.44 1.72 0.19 0 0.39 1.00 0 0.15 0.051 0 51 38 La: 0.04% 2.8 not necessaryInventive steel 15 0.43 1.76 0.22 0 0.38 0.99 0 0.09 0.021 0 49 35 Ce: 0.03% 2.9 not necessaryInventive steel 16 0.42 1.75 0.23 0.20 0.41 1.04 0 0.06 0 0.081 32 40 Rem: 0.04% 3.1 not necessaryInventive steel 17 0.42 1.71 0.21 0 0.35 1.09 0 0.15 0.004 0 45 59 -- 2.9 not necessaryInventive steel 18 0.42 1.72 0.20 0 0.34 1.09 0 0.15 0.120 0 44 60 -- 2.9 not necessaryInventive steel 19 0.42 1.71 0.19 0 0.36 1.10 0 0.15 0.320 0 45 87 -- 2.9 not necessaryInventive steel 20 0.41 1.72 0.20 0.21 0.35 1.10 0 0.15 0 0.003 45 43 -- 2.9 not necessaryInventive steel 21 0.42 1.71 0.21 0.21 0.35 1.08 0 0.15 0 0.150 45 54 -- 2.9 not necessaryInventive steel 22 0.42 1.70 0.20 0.21 0.35 1.10 0 0.15 0 0.340 45 64 -- 2.9 not necessaryInventive steel 23 0.44 1.71 0.19 0 0.36 1.10 0 0.08 0.051 0 97 73 -- 2.9 not necessaryInventive steel 24 0.42 1.70 0.21 0 0.36 1.08 0 0.09 0.050 0 159 172 -- 2.9 not__________________________________________________________________________ necessary
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________Chemical components (mass %) FP Necessity ofSteel types C Si Mn Cu Ni Cr Mo V Ti Nb N ppm S ppm other component value annealing__________________________________________________________________________Comparative 0.60 2.01 0.84 0 0 0.16 0 0 0 0 71 132 -- 3.1 not necessarysteel 25Comparative 0.54 1.49 0.88 0 0 0.71 0 0 0 0 73 117 -- 4.3 not necessarysteel 26Comparative 0.42 1.70 0.19 0.21 0.36 1.12 0 0.15 0 0 45 75 -- 2.9 not necessarysteel 27Comparative 0.59 2.00 0.84 0 0 0.15 0 0 0.041 0 139 122 -- 3.0 not necessarysteel 28Comparative 0.51 2.01 0.89 0 0 0 0 0.15 0.084 0 99 116 -- 3.2 not necessarysteel 29Comparative 0.41 1.69 0.19 0 0.35 0.98 0 0.14 0.092 0 149 75 -- 2.6 not necessarysteel 30Inventive 0.60 2.01 0.85 0 0 0.15 0 0 0.039 0 71 50 P: 0.006% 3.1 not necessarysteel 1 Zn: 0, Sn: 4 As: 12, Sb: 3Comparative 0.60 2.02 0.87 0 0 0.15 0 0 0.040 0 75 290 P: 0.026% 3.1 not necessarysteel 31Comparative 0.60 2.02 0.37 0 0 0.15 0 0 0.021 0.051 75 82 Zn: 82, Sn: 3.1 not necessarysteel 32 As: 62, Sb: 77Comparative 0.28 1.72 0.42 0 0 1.90 0.52 0 0 0 75 72 -- 12.2 necessarysteel 33Comparative 0.70 1.30 0.42 0 0 0.50 0 0 0 0 48 83 -- 2.6 not necessarysteel 34Comparative 0.41 0.05 0.42 0 0 0.99 0 0 0 0 49 76 -- 1.6 not necessarysteel 35Comparative 0.41 1.96 0.52 0 0.31 0.95 0 0 0 0 48 65 -- 8.0 necessarysteel 36Comparative 0.43 1.72 0.02 0 0 1.12 0 0 0 0 50 49 -- 1.7 not necessarysteel 37Comparative 0.42 1.71 2.90 0 0.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 50 74 -- 19.3 necessarysteel 38Comparative 0.42 1.78 0.52 0 3.62 1.10 0 0 0 0 51 52 -- 4.8 not necessarysteel 39Comparative 0.43 1.71 0.56 0 0 5.22 0 0 0 0 50 48 -- 16.4 necessarysteel 40Comparative 0.43 1.71 0.61 0 0 1.10 3.20 0 0 0 49 77 -- 47.3 necessarysteel 41Comparative 0.41 1.74 0.21 0 0.35 1.02 0 0.13 0.048 0 259 82 -- 2.8 not necessarysteel 42Comparative 0.41 1.73 0.19 0 0.34 0.99 0 0.14 0.052 0 89 377 -- 2.6 not necessarysteel 43__________________________________________________________________________ The contents of Zn, Sn, As and Sb among other components are represented in ppm.
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________Chemical components (mass %) NecessitySteel N S other FP oftypes C Si Mn Cu Ni Cr Mo V Zr Ta Hf Ti Nb ppm ppm component value annealing__________________________________________________________________________Inven- 0.61 2.01 0.84 0 0 0.15 0 0 0.06 0 0 0 0 76 110 -- 3.1 nottive necessarysteel 44Inven- 0.56 1.49 0.84 0 0 0.76 0 0 0 0.05 0 0 0 98 107 -- 4.9 necessarytivesteel 45Inven- 0.54 1.49 0.85 0 0 0.73 0 0 0 0 0.07 0 0 43 63 -- 4.9 necessarytivesteel 46Inven- 0.42 1.72 0.21 0.21 0.34 1.08 0 0.15 0.03 0 0 0.02 0 42 42 -- 2.9 notsteel 47 necessaryInven- 0.44 1.64 0.19 0 0.41 0.90 0 0.20 0 0.02 0 0.04 0.03 45 58 -- 2.9 notsteel 48 necessaryInven- 0.40 2.50 0.42 0 1.82 0.91 0.48 0.20 0 0 0.02 0.05 0 44 61 -- 16.8 necessarysteel 49Inven- 0.35 2.49 0.40 0 2.29 2.92 0.40 0.20 0.02 0.02 0 0 0.04 62 73 -- 37.4 necessarysteel 50Inven- 0.35 2.49 0.41 0 1.00 2.92 1.51 0 0 0.03 0.02 0 0 36 74 -- 70.4 necessarysteel 51Inven- 0.42 1.69 0.19 0 0.34 1.08 0 0 0.05 0 0 0.06 0 44 69 Al: 0.03% 2.8 notsteel 52 necessaryInven- 0.42 1.71 0.20 0 0.33 1.05 0 0.15 0.05 0 0 0.05 0 46 65 B: 15 ppm 2.8 notsteel 53 necessaryInven- 0.41 1.80 0.93 0 0.35 0.75 0.35 0 0 0.04 0 0 0.06 53 53 Co: 0.70% 11.7 necessarysteel 54Inven- 0.41 1.76 0.93 0.58 0.36 0.59 0.41 0 0 0 0.03 0 0.04 74 81 W: 0.21% 10.2 necessarysteel 55Inven- 0.42 1.75 0.19 0 0.42 0.93 0 0.20 0 0.04 0 0.05 0 45 49 Ca: 2.7 notsteel 56 12 ppm necessaryInven- 0.43 1.72 0.19 0 0.39 1.01 0 0.15 0 0.04 0 0.05 0 54 51 La: 0.04% 2.8 notsteel 57 necessaryInven- 0.43 1.76 0.22 0 0.36 1.00 0 0.09 0 0.04 0 0.02 0 47 50 Ce: 0.03% 2.9 notsteel 58 necessaryInven- 0.42 1.74 0.22 0.20 0.43 1.05 0 0.06 0 0.04 0 0 0.08 29 45 Rem: 3.1 notsteel 59 0.04% necessaryInven- 0.42 1.70 0.21 0 0.36 1.08 0 0.15 0.004 0 0 0 0 45 58 -- 2.9 notsteel 60 necessaryInven- 0.42 1.71 0.20 0 0.34 1.10 0 0.15 0.120 0 0 0 0 44 57 -- 2.9 notsteel 61 necessaryInven- 0.42 1.72 0.19 0 0.36 1.10 0 0.15 0.320 0 0 0 0 45 60 -- 2.9 notsteel 62 necessaryInven- 0.41 1.72 0.20 0 0.35 1.10 0 0.15 0 0.003 0 0 0 48 63 -- 2.9 notsteel 63 necessaryInven- 0.42 1.71 0.21 0 0.35 1.08 0 0.15 0 0.142 0 0 0 47 69 -- 2.9 notsteel 64 necessaryInven- 0.42 1.70 0.20 0 0.35 1.10 0 0.15 0 0.322 0 0 0 45 77 -- 2.9 notsteel 65 necessaryInven- 0.41 1.70 0.20 0.19 0.35 1.10 0 0.15 0 0 0.004 0 0 45 65 -- 2.9 notsteel 66 necessaryInven- 0.42 1.71 0.21 0.22 0.35 1.08 0 0.15 0 0 0.120 0 0 49 69 -- 2.9 notsteel 67 necessaryInven- 0.42 1.70 0.20 0.21 0.35 1.10 0 0.15 0 0 0.311 0 0 49 63 -- 2.9 notsteel 68 necessaryInven- 0.44 1.71 0.19 0 0.36 1.10 0 0.08 0.051 0 0 0 0 92 62 -- 2.9 notsteel 69 necessaryInven- 0.42 1.70 0.21 0 0.36 1.08 0 0.09 0.050 0 0 0 0 164 93 -- 2.9 notsteel 70 necessary__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________Chemical components (mass %) NecessitySteel N S other FP oftypes C Si Mn Cu Ni Cr Mo V Zr Ta Hf Ti Nb ppm ppm component value annealing__________________________________________________________________________Com- 0.60 2.01 0.84 0 0 0.16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 132 -- 3.1 notparative necessarysteel 71Com- 0.54 1.49 0.88 0 0 0.71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 128 -- 4.3 notparative necessarysteel 72Com- 0.42 1.70 -0.19 0.21 0.36 1.12 0 0.15 0 0 0 0 0 45 65 -- 2.9 notparative necessarysteel 73Com- 0.59 2.00 0.84 0 0 0.15 0 0 0.042 0 0 0 0 129 136 -- 3.0 notparative necessarysteel 74Com- 0.61 2.01 0.89 0 0 0 0 0.15 0 0.079 0 0 0 92 96 -- 3.2 notparative necessarysteel 75Com- 0.41 1.69 0.19 0 0.35 0.98 0 0.14 0 0 0.089 0 0 158 87 -- 2.6 notparative necessarysteel 76Inven- 0.61 2.01 0.84 0 0 0.15 0 0 0.041 0 0 0 0 72 49 P: 0.006% 3.1 nottive Zn: 0, necessarysteel 44 Sn: 3 As: 15, Sb: 5Com- 0.60 1.99 0.84 0 0 0.16 0 0 0.042 0 0 0 0 74 310 P: 0.029% 3.1 notparative necessarysteel 77Com- 0.59 2.00 0.85 0 0 0.15 0 0 0.032 0 0.041 0 0 77 82 Zn: 85, 3.1 notparative Sn: 72 necessarysteel 78 As: 63, Sb: 82Com- 0.28 1.72 0.42 0 0 1.90 0.52 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 72 -- 12.2 necessaryparativesteel 79Com- 0.70 1.30 0.42 0 0 0.50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 83 -- 2.6 notparative necessarysteel 80Com- 0.41 0.05 0.42 0 0 0.99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 76 -- 1.6 notparative necessarysteel 81Com- 0.41 4.50 0.52 0 0.31 0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 65 -- 8.0 necessaryparativesteel 82Com- 0.43 1.72 0.02 0 0 1.12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 49 -- 1.7 notparative necessarysteel 83Com- 0.42 1.71 2.90 0 0.36 1.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 74 -- 19.3 necessaryparativesteel 84Com- 0.42 1.70 0.52 0 3.62 1.10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 52 -- 4.8 notparative necessarysteel 85Com- 0.43 1.71 0.56 0 0 5.22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 48 -- 16.4 necessaryparativesteel 86Com- 0.43 1.71 0.61 0 0 1.10 3.20 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 77 -- 47.3 necessaryparativesteel 87Com- 0.41 1.71 0.20 0 0.36 1.02 0 0.13 0.13 0 0 0 0 252 89 -- 2.7 notparative necessarysteel 88Com- 0.42 1.73 0.19 0 0.35 0.99 0 0.14 0.05 0 0 0 0 79 357 -- 2.7 notparative necessarysteel 89__________________________________________________________________________ The Contents of Zn, Sn, As and Sb among other Components are represented in ppm.
TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________Chemical components (mass %) NecessitySteel N S other FP oftypes C Si Mn Cu Ni Cr Mo V Zr Ta Hf Ti Nb ppm ppm component value annealing__________________________________________________________________________Inven- 0.42 1.71 0.20 0 0.31 1.06 0 0.17 0.06 0 0 0 0.04 76 52 -- 2.8 necessarytivesteel 90Inven- 0.41 1.72 0.22 0 0.35 1.05 0 0.15 0.04 0 0.05 0 0 98 57 -- 2.7 necessarytivesteel 91Inven- 0.42 1.70 0.21 0 0.36 1.03 0 0.15 0.05 0.05 0 0 0 43 63 -- 2.8 necessarytivesteel 92Inven- 0.42 1.72 0.21 0.21 0.34 1.02 0 0.15 0.03 0.03 0 0.05 0 42 42 -- 2.8 necessarytivesteel 93Inven- 0.44 1.54 0.19 0 0.35 1.08 0 0.14 0.03 0 0 0.04 0.03 45 58 -- 2.8 necessarytivesteel 94Inven- 0.42 1.68 0.22 0 0.35 1.06 0 0.15 0 0 0.02 0.05 0.03 44 61 -- 2.9 necessarytivesteel 95__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________Chemical components (mass %) NecessitySteel N S other FP oftypes C Si Mn Cu Ni Cr Mo V Zr Ta Hf Ti Nb ppm ppm component value annealing__________________________________________________________________________Inven- 0.41 1.69 0.05 -- -- 0.95 -- -- -- -- -- 0.051 -- 55 81 -- 1.5 nottive necessarysteel 96Inven- 0.39 1.71 0.06 -- -- 0.97 -- -- -- -- -- 0.049 0.04 49 92 -- 1.6 nottive necessarysteel 97Inven- 0.39 1.69 0.09 -- -- 0.95 -- 0.25 -- -- -- 0.052 -- 49 58 -- 1.7 nottive necessarysteel 98Inven- 0.41 1.71 0.08 -- 0.36 0.96 -- -- -- -- -- 0.049 -- 40 67 -- 1.9 nottive necessarysteel 99Inven- 0.41 1.68 0.06 0.18 -- 0.96 -- -- -- -- -- 0.043 -- 38 103 -- 1.6 nottive necessarysteel100Inven- 0.42 1.73 0.09 0.19 0.3 0.95 -- -- -- -- -- 0.052 -- 54 88 -- 2.0 nottive necessarysteel101Inven- 0.41 1.76 0.008 -- -- 0.94 0.2 -- -- -- -- 0.053 -- 53 74 -- 2.2 nottive necessarysteel102__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 7__________________________________________________________________________Hardness(HRC) Resistance to hydrogen embrittlement Fatigue performanceafter Old Hydrogen Corrosion Number of fractures Number ofhardening austenite Fracture embrittle- fatigue due to the presence of inclusions of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and HfSteel and particle size toughness ment cracking life sions of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and 20 .mu.m 10-20 5-10 0.5-5types tempering (.mu.m) (K.sub.IC) life (sec) (times) 10.sup.5 -10.sup.6 times 10.sup.6 -10.sup.7 mores .mu.m .mu.m .mu.m__________________________________________________________________________Inven- 53.4 12 42 501 6.9 .times. 10.sup.4 0 1 1 41 402 >3000tivesteel 1Inven- 53.6 9 45 612 9.4 .times. 10.sup.4 0 2 3 38 481 >3000tivesteel 2Inven- 53.2 8 57 1127 1.6 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 9 165 >10000tivesteel 3Inven- 53.6 9 58 1202 1.7 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 0 145 >10000tivesteel 4Inven- 53.2 10 52 893 1.3 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 3 189 >10000tivesteel 5Inven- 53.8 17 71 1982 2.4 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 10 191 >10000tivesteel 6Inven- 54.0 19 70 2032 3.2 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 12 259 >10000tivesteel 7Inven- 53.8 19 65 1308 2.8 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 6 122 >10000tivesteel 8Inven- 53.5 12 57 1152 1.4 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 6 282 >10000tivesteel 9Inven- 53.5 11 55 998 1.2 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 12 229 >10000tivesteel 10Inven- 53.5 15 56 1027 1.6 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 13 175 >10000tivesteel 11Inven- 53.4 13 51 742 1.3 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 14 409 >5000tivesteel 12Inven- 53.6 14 54 795 2.1 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 11 276 >10000tivesteel 13Inven- 53.2 13 55 809 1.9 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 12 129 >10000tivesteel 14Inven- 53.4 16 54 699 1.9 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 4 121 >10000tivesteel 15Inven- 53.6 13 52 712 1.7 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 17 343 >10000tivesteel 16Inven- 53.4 17 53 832 1.4 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 0 52 >10000tivesteel 17Inven- 53.5 9 56 1145 1.7 .times. 10.sup.5 0 1 0 9 448 >5000tivesteel 18Inven- 53.2 8 57 1121 1.6 .times. 10.sup.5 0 2 0 19 485 >5000tivesteel 19Inven- 53.2 18 54 801 1.4 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 0 42 >10000tivesteel 20Inventive 53.3 9 56 1098 1.6 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 21 399 >5000tivesteel 21Inven- 53.5 8 57 1035 1.6 .times. 10.sup.5 0 3 0 35 432 >5000tivesteel 22Inven- 53.4 6 55 999 1.4 .times. 10.sup.5 0 2 3 32 389 >10000tivesteel 23Inven- 53.7 7 53 938 1.4 .times. 10.sup.5 0 3 4 28 465 >10000tivesteel 24__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 8__________________________________________________________________________Hardness(HRC) Resistance to hydrogen embrittlement Fatigue performanceafter Old Hydrogen Corrosion Number of fractures Number ofhardening austenite Fracture embrittle- fatigue due to the presence of inclusions of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and HfSteel and particle size toughness ment cracking life sions of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and 20 .mu.m 10-20 5-10 0.5-5types tempering (.mu.m) (K.sub.IC) life (sec) (times) 10.sup.5 -10.sup.6 times 10.sup.6 -10.sup.7 mores .mu.m .mu.m .mu.m__________________________________________________________________________Com- 53.4 24 39 28 3.2 .times. 10.sup.4 0 0 0 3 9 <100parativesteel 25Com- 53.6 17 43 42 4.1 .times. 10.sup.4 0 0 0 6 10 <100parativesteel 26Com- 53.2 18 52 298 7.3 .times. 10.sup.4 0 0 0 2 8 <100parativesteel 27Com- 53.7 9 40 256 5.8 .times. 10.sup.4 6 4 12 81 706 >3000parativesteel 28Com- 54.0 18 39 97 5.5 .times. 10.sup.4 7 3 18 68 886 >3000parativesteel 29Com- 53.9 16 50 487 7.7 .times. 10.sup.4 4 6 3 36 964 >3000parativesteel 30Com- 53.5 14 32 38 4.3 .times. 10.sup.4 0 0 0 27 593 >3000parativesteel 31Com- 53.5 14 35 82 4.1 .times. 10.sup.4 0 0 0 31 631 >3000parativesteel 32Com- 48.9 31 -- -- -- -- -- 1 6 16 <100parativesteel 33Com- 53.4 25 30 8 2.2 .times. 10.sup.4 -- -- 0 5 20 <100parativesteel 34Com- 47.6 32 -- -- -- -- -- 0 11 10 <100parativesteel 35Com- 55.5 40 40 123 4.8 .times. 10.sup.4 -- -- 0 13 25 <100parativesteel 36Com- 48.2 42 -- -- -- -- -- 0 9 16 <100parativesteel 37Com- 48.7 39 -- -- -- -- -- 0 3 20 <100parativesteel 38Com- 49.2 32 -- -- -- -- -- 0 13 31 <100parativesteel 39Com- 49.1 42 -- -- -- -- -- 0 12 35 <100parativesteel 40Com- 49.5 35 -- -- -- -- -- 0 11 41 <100parativesteel 41Com- 53.6 15 39 759 1.4 .times. 10.sup.5 4 5 7 40 989 >10000parativesteel 42Com- 53.5 14 37 711 1.5 .times. 10.sup.5 3 7 6 28 772 >10000parativesteel 43__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 9__________________________________________________________________________Hardness(HRC) Resistance to hydrogen embrittlement Fatigue performanceafter Old Hydrogen Corrosion Number of fractures Number ofhardening austenite Fracture embrittle- fatigue due to the presence of inclusions of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and HfSteel and particle size toughness ment cracking life sions of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and 20 .mu.m 10-20 5-10 0.5-5types tempering (.mu.m) (K.sub.IC) life (sec) (times) 10.sup.5 -10.sup.6 times 10.sup.6 -10.sup.7 mores .mu.m .mu.m .mu.m__________________________________________________________________________Inventive 53.5 11 42 455 5.8 .times. 10.sup.4 0 1 2 44 398 >3000steel 44Inventive 53.6 7 44 508 9.1 .times. 10.sup.4 0 2 4 40 471 >3000steel 45Inventive 53.5 10 43 349 8.2 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 12 483 >5000steel 46Inventive 53.2 10 57 1036 1.2 .times. 10.sup.5 0. 0 0 8 148 >10000steel 47Inventive 53.2 12 52 769 1.3 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 4 179 >10000steel 48Inventive 53.8 15 71 1659 2.2 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 10 197 >10000steel 49Inventive 54.0 18 70 1897 2.8 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 14 278 >10000steel 50Inventive 53.8 17 65 1287 2.7 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 6 138 >10000steel 51Inventive 53.5 13 57 999 1.3 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 6 290 >10000steel 52Inventive 53.5 9 55 799 1.1 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 14 246 >10000steel 53Inventive 53.9 13 56 1049 1.5 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 16 247 >10000steel 54Inventive 53.4 15 51 598 1.3 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 14 459 >3000steel 55Inventive 53.6 17 54 823 1.9 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 16 256 >10000steel 56Inventive 53.2 13 55 757 2.0 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 13 119 >10000steel 57Inventive 53.4 18 54 632 1.8 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 4 174 >10000steel 58Inventive 53.9 12 52 514 1.5 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 17 326 >10000steel 59Inventive 53.4 17 53 812 1.4 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 0 35 >10000steel 60Inventive 53.5 9 56 1022 1.6 .times. 10.sup.5 0 1 0 13 462 >5000steel 61Inventive 53.2 8 57 991 1.5 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 22 445 >5000steel 62Inventive 53.2 18 54 781 1.3 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 0 58 >10000steel 63Inventive 53.3 9 56 1018 1.6 .times. 10.sup.5 0 1 0 20 368 >5000steel 64Inventive 53.5 8 57 985 1.6 .times. 10.sup.5 0 3 0 35 417 >5000steel 65Inventive 53.4 8 55 759 1.4 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 0 49 >10000steel 66Inventive 53.7 7 53 938 1.5 .times. 10.sup.5 0 3 0 26 435 >5000steel 67Inventive 53.4 8 55 899 1.5 .times. 10.sup.5 0 2 0 38 359 >5000steel 68Inventive 53.7 7 53 908 1.4 .times. 10.sup.5 0 3 4 26 465 >5000steel 69Inventive 53.7 7 53 888 1.4 .times. 10.sup.5 0 3 5 25 465 >5000steel 70__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 10__________________________________________________________________________Hardness(HRC) Resistance to hydrogen embrittlement Fatigue performanceafter Old Hydrogen Corrosion Number of fractures Number ofhardening austenite Fracture embrittle- fatigue due to the presence of inclusions of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and HfSteel and particle size toughness ment cracking life sions of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and 20 .mu.m 10-20 5-10 0.5-5types tempering (.mu.m) (K.sub.IC) life (sec) (times) 10.sup.5 -10.sup.6 times 10.sup.6 -10.sup.7 mores .mu.m .mu.m .mu.m__________________________________________________________________________Compara- 53.4 24 39 28 3.2 .times. 10.sup.4 0 0 0 3 9 <100tivesteel 71Compara- 53.6 17 43 42 4.1 .times. 10.sup.4 0 0 0 6 10 <100tivesteel 72Compara- 53.2 18 52 298 7.3 .times. 10.sup.4 0 0 0 2 8 <100tivesteel 73Compara- 53.7 9 40 256 5.8 .times. 10.sup.4 5 4 16 54 741 >3000tivesteel 74Compara- 54.0 18 39 97 5.5 .times. 10.sup.4 7 3 17 82 892 >3000tivesteel 75Compara- 53.9 16 50 487 7.7 .times. 10.sup.4 3 6 9 48 921 >3000tivesteel 76Compara- 53.5 14 32 38 4.3 .times. 10.sup.4 0 0 0 27 593 >3000tivesteel 77Compara- 53.5 14 35 82 4.1 .times. 10.sup.4 0 0 0 31 631 >3000tivesteel 78Compara- 48.9 31 -- -- -- -- -- 1 6 16 <100tivesteel 79Compara- 53.4 25 30 8 2.2 .times. 10.sup.4 -- -- 0 5 20 <100tivesteel 80Compara- 47.6 32 -- -- -- -- -- 0 11 10 <100tivesteel 81Compara- 55.5 40 40 123 4.8 .times. 10.sup.4 -- -- 0 13 25 <100tivesteel 82Compara- 48.2 42 -- -- -- -- -- 0 9 16 <100tivesteel 83Compara- 48.7 39 -- -- -- -- -- 0 3 20 <100tivesteel 84Compara- 49.2 32 -- -- -- -- -- 0 13 31 <100tivesteel 85Compara- 49.1 42 -- -- -- -- -- 0 12 35 <100tivesteel 86Compara- 49.5 35 -- -- -- -- -- 0 11 41 <100tivesteel 87Compara- 53.6 49 16 642 1.4 .times. 10.sup.5 5 5 8 49 939 >10000tivesteel 88Compara- 53.5 48 18 652 1.3 .times. 10.sup.5 4 6 6 52 732 >10000tivesteel 89__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 11__________________________________________________________________________Hardness(HRC) Resistance to hydrogen embrittlement Fatigue performanceafter Old Hydrogen Corrosion Number of fractures Number ofhardening austenite Fracture embrittle- fatigue due to the presence of inclusions of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and HfSteel and particle size toughness ment cracking life sions of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and 20 .mu.m 10-20 5-10 0.5-5types tempering (.mu.m) (K.sub.IC) life (sec) (times) 10.sup.5 -10.sup.6 times 10.sup.6 -10.sup.7 mores .mu.m .mu.m .mu.m__________________________________________________________________________Inventive 53.4 10 56 955 1.1 .times. 10.sup.4 0 0 0 13 421 <10000steel 90Inventive 53.6 7 54 872 1.2 .times. 10.sup.4 0 0 0 10 431 >10000steel 91Inventive 53.5 9 58 849 1.3 .times. 10.sup.4 0 0 0 14 483 >10000steel 92Inventive 53.2 10 57 1021 1.2 .times. 10.sup.4 0 0 0 8 348 >10000steel 93Inventive 53.2 12 54 1069 1.1 .times. 10.sup.4 0 0 0 9 429 >10000steel 94Inventive 53.8 10 55 1101 1.2 .times. 10.sup.4 0 0 0 10 444 >10000steel 95__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 12__________________________________________________________________________Hardness(HRC) Resistance to hydrogen embrittlement Fatigue performanceafter Old Hydrogen Corrosion Number of fractures Number ofhardening austenite Fracture embrittle- fatigue due to the presence of inclusions of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and HfSteel and particle size toughness ment cracking life sions of Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta and 20 .mu.m 10-20 5-10 0.5-5types tempering (.mu.m) (K.sub.IC) life (sec) (times) 10.sup.5 -10.sup.6 times 10.sup.6 -10.sup.7 mores .mu.m .mu.m .mu.m__________________________________________________________________________Inventive 53.1 11 55 877 1.4 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 11 403 <10000steel 96Inventive 54.2 7 54 904 1.3 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 13 443 >10000steel 97Inventive 53.3 7 53 901 1.5 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 9 457 >10000steel 98Inventive 52.9 12 58 867 1.7 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 12 376 >10000steel 99Inventive 53.4 11 57 899 1.6 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 14 553 >10000steel 100Inventive 53.2 12 58 867 1.6 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 8 465 >10000steel 101Inventive 54.1 8 54 856 1.6 .times. 10.sup.5 0 0 0 12 387 >10000steel 102__________________________________________________________________________

Number	Date	Country
7-280931	Oct 1995	JPX
7-280932	Oct 1995	JPX
8-211708	Aug 1996	JPX

Number	Name	Date	Kind
4909866	Abe et al.	Mar 1990
5284529	Shikanai et al.	Feb 1994

Number	Date	Country
1 950 004	Apr 1971	DEX
31 24 977	Apr 1982	DEX

Spring steel with excellent resistance to hydrogen embrittlement and fatigue

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (3)

US Referenced Citations (2)

Foreign Referenced Citations (2)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)

Entry
English Abstract of De 1 950 004, Apr. 22, 1971.
English Abstract of De 31 24 977, Apr. 29, 1982.