This invention relates to sprinkler heads and, more particularly, to sprinkler heads that nutate while they rotate to minimize the “donut effect” prevalent with conventional non-nutating sprinkler heads.
Various nutating or wobbling sprinkler head designs have been available but with potential shortcomings that can nullify the very nutating effect that makes such sprinklers attractive in the first instance. Examples of known nutating or wobbling sprinkler heads may be found in prior U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,381,960; 5,950,927; and 6,932,279. Commonly owned U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,439,174; 5,588,595; 5,671,885; 6,267,299; and 6,439,477 provide further examples of nutating or wobbling sprinkler heads.
One problem often encountered with sprinklers of this type relates to stalling at start-up or during normal operation. Stalling occurs when the water distribution plate of the sprinkler head fails to tilt at start up, or ceases tilting during operation, thereby simply rotating and distributing a stream particularly susceptible to the “donut effect” where the wetted pattern area is shaped like a solid ring around a dry center. When nutating or wobbling sprinklers operate as designed, the nutating action tends to fill in the pattern in a substantially uniform manner. Thus, it is critical that the water distribution plate reliably and consistently remain in a tilted orientation while rotating to achieve the desired nutating action.
In one exemplary embodiment, a sprinkler head includes an adapter, nozzle body and spindle assembly that supports a nutating cage and water distribution plate. The cage is loosely supported on a double-flanged spool secured to the spindle, allowing the cage and water distribution to rotate and nutate about the spindle. The cage supports one magnet ring and the spindle supports another, in proximity to one another, with like poles facing each other. With this arrangement, and before water under pressure is supplied to the sprinkler head, the repulsion force between the magnets moves the cage and cage magnet along the spindle spool away from the spindle magnet which, at the same time, draws the water distribution plate upwardly (in the orientation of
When water under pressure is supplied to the sprinkler head, the force of the water on the water distribution plate pushes the plate, cage and cage magnet downwardly, toward the spindle magnet. As the cage magnet approaches the spindle magnet, the magnetic repulsion force increases, creating positional instability in the cage assembly, causing the cage and water distribution plate to tilt off-axis. So long as water emitted from the nozzle impinges on the deflection plate, pushing the cage magnet towards the spindle magnet, the distribution plate will remain tilted as it rotates, resulting in a nutating or wobbling motion as the distribution plate rotates.
In another exemplary embodiment, the spindle magnet lies axially between the spool flanges while the cage magnet forms the upper one of the two axially spaced spool flanges. The operation of the device remains substantially as described above.
In a third exemplary embodiment, the opposed magnets are located in a cap assembly incorporating the water distribution plate and located downstream of the sprinkler nozzle and spindle. Here again, at rest, the repulsion force pushes the water distribution plate (and cage magnet) away from the fixed magnet in the cap assembly, and maintains the water distribution plate in a substantially non-tilted position. When water under pressure strikes the distribution plate, causing it to rotate, the magnetic force between the pair of magnets increases to destabilize the distribution plate and to cause it to tilt.
In still another embodiment, the components are generally as described above in connection with the second embodiment but, in this case, the fixed magnet is seated in a stationary strut assembly surrounding the cage and distribution plate.
Thus, in accordance with one aspect, there is provided a sprinkler head comprising: a body assembly including an adapter, a nozzle, a spindle and a first magnet, the spindle supporting a spool having a pair of axially-spaced radially-oriented spool flanges; a nutating cage loosely mounted on the spindle, between the radial flanges of the spool, the nutating cage supporting a second magnet in close proximity to the first magnet; a water distribution plate carried by the nutating cage and adapted to be impinged upon by a stream emitted from the nozzle, and wherein the first and second magnets are arranged with like poles facing each other such that the second magnet is repulsed from the first magnet, but when the stream impinges on the water distribution plate, the second magnet is moved towards the first magnet, with magnetic repulsion force increasing and causing the nutating cage and the water distribution plate to tilt off axis.
In another aspect, a nutating head assembly for use with a sprinkler is provided, the assembly comprising a housing formed with a center cavity defined in part by a cylindrical wall supporting a spool retainer ring; a first magnet supported in a base portion of the cavity; a spool assembly including a pair of radial flanges or opposite ends of a spacer ring, the spool assembly loosely confined on the retainer ring; the spool assembly comprising an upper hub component supporting a water distribution plate and a lower hub component supporting a second magnet located in proximity to the first magnet, the first and second magnets having like poles facing each other.
In still another aspect, there is provided a method of generating a nutating movement in a sprinkler water distribution plate as the plate rotates comprising: mounting a water distribution plate provided with at least one drive groove loosely on a sprinkler body such that the water distribution plate is free to nutate and rotate; utilizing a pair of magnets with like poles facing each other move the water distribution plate in a first direction to a non-tilted orientation when at rest; utilizing water under pressure impinging on the at least one drive groove in the water distribution plate to move the water distribution plate in an opposite direction such that repulsion forces between the pair of magnets is increased, thereby causing the water distribution plate to move to a tilted orientation that is maintained as the water distribution plate rotates due to the water under pressure impinging on the at least one drive groove.
The exemplary embodiments will now be described in detail in connection with the drawings identified below.
With reference to
The spindle 20 is formed with a substantially cylindrical portion 28 (
The water distribution plate 26 is part of a nutating head assembly that includes a three-spoke cage 46 (
In order to prevent stalling during operation, it is desirable to insure that the distribution plate 26 tilts on start-up with respect to an axis extending through the center of the sprinkler head 10 and through the nozzle orifice 24. Accordingly, the spindle magnet ring 44 and the cage magnet ring 50 are located adjacent each other, with like poles facing each other (
When water is supplied under pressure to the sprinkler head 10, the pressure of the stream impinging on the distribution plate 26 will push the cage 46 and plate 26 downwardly, such that the cage magnet 50 approaches the spindle magnet 44. As the cage magnet 50 approaches the spindle magnet 44, the repulsion force between the magnets increases, creating instability which causes the cage 46 and distribution plate 26 to tilt off-axis (see
In the exemplary embodiment described above, note that there need not be any fixed struts or spokes surrounding the nutating head assembly, eliminating the problem of local water drip-off or drool that leads to excess water collection surrounding the sprinkler head.
In another exemplary embodiment illustrated in
In another exemplary embodiment shown in
A lower hub component 81 is press and snap-fit into the upper hub component 76 at 82. The lower hub component is formed with a first inverted magnet T-shaped disc 84 embedded therein. The lower hub component 81 is also formed with an external annular shoulder 86 and the spool assembly 78 is sandwiched between the shoulder 86 and the underside surface 88 of the shield 80. The spool assembly 78 comprises upper and lower rings 90, 92, each of which has a cylindrical component 94, 96, respectively, which enable the rings to be telescoped over the upper and lower hub components. The rings 90, 92 are separated by a sleeve or spacer 95 that serves as the spool hub.
The spool assembly 78 is loosely secured within an outside ring 97 that may be made of suitable wear-resistant material, such as a ceramic. An annular retainer 98 holds the ring 97 in place. The lower hub component is thus received in a center cavity 100 formed in the body 102 of the cap assembly. At the base of the cavity, a second magnet disc 104 is seated within an aperture 106. Magnet discs 84 and 104 are in opposing relationship, again with like poles facing each other. As in the previously described embodiment, when the sprinkler is at rest, the repulsion force between the magnets are substantially uniform and maintain the distribution plate 70 in a substantially non-tilted position. When a stream from the nozzle (not shown) impinges on the plate 70, however, the nutating head assembly 68 (and magnet disc 84) is pushed towards the magnet disc 104, with increased repulsion forces causing instability and resultant tilting of the assembly 68 to an off-axis position as shown in
It should also be noted that the lower hub component 81 may be constructed of any suitably heavy metal material, e.g., brass, to also serve as a counterweight that promotes a controlled nutating action of the assembly 68 as it rotates.
While the examples above have been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2848276 | Clearman | Aug 1958 | A |
3034728 | Hruby, Jr. | May 1962 | A |
3532273 | Siddal et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3958643 | Landsberg | May 1976 | A |
3964685 | Chauvigne | Jun 1976 | A |
4073438 | Meyer | Feb 1978 | A |
4487368 | Clearman | Dec 1984 | A |
5381960 | Sullivan et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5439174 | Sweet | Aug 1995 | A |
5588595 | Sweet et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5671885 | Davisson | Sep 1997 | A |
5950927 | Elliott et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6092739 | Clearman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6129293 | Jager | Oct 2000 | A |
6176440 | Elliott | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6267299 | Meyer | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6382525 | Santiesteban et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6431475 | Williams | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439477 | Sweet et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6932279 | Burcham | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20060091232 | Grant | May 2006 | A1 |
20060249594 | Pinch | Nov 2006 | A1 |