Gear sets are useful devices for transmitting torque, and changing the direction of motion as well as changing the ratio of an input motion to that of an output motion. Clearance between the teeth of one gear and the teeth of a meshing gear is often referred to as backlash. At times, backlash may manifest itself as perceptible noise attributable to rattling of gear teeth as the teeth from one gear make contact with the teeth of a mating gear. The loudness and the annoyance associated with it are proportional to the amount of backlash present.
A certain amount of backlash is required and is intentionally built into gear systems to prevent energy loss due to friction. Much of the backlash is due to dimensional variations of the various components that make up the gear system. Additional backlash is created due to normal wear of components over time. As a result, the objectionable noise tends to increase as the parts wear and the clearances increase.
While gear play noise is not indicative of a defect in the gearing system, it often proves to be an annoyance and it is desirable to minimize it as much as practicable. Accordingly there is a need in the art for gear systems that automatically eliminate backlash due to build variations as well wear of the components.
Disclosed herein is an apparatus that relates to a gear set. The apparatus includes, a housing, a first gear movable in the housing such that a first axis defined by the first gear is repositionable relative to the housing, a second gear in mesh with the first gear, and a second axis defined by the second gear. The apparatus constrains movement of the first axis to a plane containing both the first axis and a line commonly perpendicular to the first axis and the second axis, and a biasing member that urges the first gear toward the second gear.
Further disclosed herein is an apparatus that relates to a gear set. The apparatus includes, a first gear having teeth and a first shaft, a second gear having teeth and a second shaft, and the teeth of the second gear mesh with the teeth of the first gear. The apparatus also includes a housing and the second shaft is rotationally attached thereto, and the first shaft is rotationally and movably attached thereto. The apparatus is structured such that the movement of the first shaft is constrained to a plane containing both the first shaft and a line commonly perpendicular to the first shaft and the second shaft. The apparatus further includes a biasing member that urges movement of the first shaft toward the second shaft thereby maintaining continuous contact of the teeth of the first gear with the teeth of the second gear.
Further disclosed herein is a method of meshing gears. The method includes, urging a first gear into mesh with a second gear, and constraining movement of the first gear to a plane containing both an axis of the first gear and a line commonly perpendicular to the axis of the first gear and an axis of the second gear.
The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike:
A detailed description of several embodiments of the disclosed apparatus and method are presented herein by way of exemplification and not limitation with reference to
A schematic representation of the gear set apparatus 1 of one embodiment of the present invention is depicted in
Both the worm 2 and the meshed worm gear 4 are located within a housing 10. The worm gear 4 and the axis 5 are held positionally constant relative to the housing 10, whereas, the worm 2 and the axis 3 are repositionable relative to the housing 10. The movement of the worm 2 and the axis 3 is restrained relative to the housing 10 and the worm gear 4 and the axis 5 such that the movement of the worm 2 and the worm axis 3 are constrained to a plane that contains both the worm axis 3 and a line commonly perpendicular to the worm axis 3 and the worm gear axis 5. Such an embodiment will, as should be appreciated by one skilled in the art, maintain a substantially constant angle between the two gear axes when viewed along the direction of a line commonly perpendicular to the two axes. It should also be appreciated by one skilled in the art that other cross-axis gears, such as non-enveloping helical, for example, may be used in place of the worm 2 and the worm gear 4 depicted in the embodiments of this disclosure, and that the shaft angle need not be 90 degrees, while remaining within the scope of the invention.
In one embodiment of the invention the worm gear 4 is fixed to a shaft 18 and has bearings (not shown) whose axis 5 orientation and location is fixed with respect to housing 10. Worm 2 is fixed to shaft 16 engaging pivot bearing 7 and bearing 20, such that it is free to rotate about worm axis 3. A pair of axial preload springs 8 and axial preload dampers 9, may be included to, load the worm 2 between the bearings 7 and 20 to prevent noise due to axial play, and provide shock attenuation. The bearings 7 and 20 on either end of the worm are mounted relative to the housing 10 in significantly different arrangements. Bearing 20 is fixedly attached to a bearing holder 22 that is repositionable relative to the housing 10. The repositioning of bearing 20 moves the worm 2 towards the worm gear 4 thereby eliminating any clearance (also known as backlash) between the teeth of the worm 2 and worm gear 4 resulting from build tolerances and component wear. This repositioning is controlled by a four-bar-linkage arrangement that is discussed further below. Alternately, pivot bearing 7 is not repositionable relative to the housing 10, however it allows the opposite end of the worm 2 located at bearing 20 to move thereby creating a virtual coupler pivot 11 substantially central to bearing 7.
In this particular embodiment, four-bar-linkage, comprising far link 23 and near link 26, connects the bearing holder 22 to the housing 10. The far link 23 is on the far side of the worm axis 3 from the worm gear 4, whereas the near link 26 is on the near side of the worm axis 3 from the worm gear 4. The far link 23 is rotationally attached to the housing 10 by far link inner pivot 24 and to the bearing holder 22 by far link outer pivot 25. The near link 26 is rotationally attached to the housing 10 by near link inner pivot 27 and to the bearing holder 22 by near link outer pivot 28. The axes of the four pivots, namely, the far link inner pivot 24, the far link outer pivot 25, the near link inner pivot 27 and the near link outer pivot 28 are each substantially perpendicular to the sprung worm axis 3 and contained within planes that are parallel to a plane formed by the fixed worm gear axis 5 and a line that is commonly perpendicular to both axes 5 and 3. Additionally the worm axis 3 is substantially midway between the far link inner pivot 24 and the near link inner pivot 27, similarly the worm axis 3 is substantially midway between the far link outer pivot 25 and the near link outer pivot 28. Thereby creating a four-bar-linkage that is symmetrical about axis 3.
The four-bar-linkage just described allows the bearing holder 22 to be moved about pivot bearing 7 resulting in the axis 3 pivoting about the virtual coupler pivot 11. The center of the virtual coupler pivot 11 is defined by the point where an extension of the far link 23 and the near link 26 would intersect. In an embodiment, the far link 23 and near link 26 may be set to create a virtual coupler pivot 11 that intersects the worm axis 3 at the center of the pivot bearing 7. A lateral hinge biasing force may also be incorporated in the link pivots of the four-bar-linkages to prevent lateral hinge rattle. Other embodiments may have a near link that is parallel to a far link, thereby not having an intersection of their extensions. In this case the center of the coupler pivot would be at infinity and the coupler motion would be substantially normal to axis 3.
The four-bar-linkage of an exemplary embodiment creates a center biasing force, more specifically, a force that acts to center the worm axis 3 midway between the far link inner pivot 24 and the near link inner pivot 27. Similarly, this biasing force acts to center the worm axis 3 midway between the far link outer pivot 25 and the near link outer pivot 28. It should be understood that an alternate embodiment could use this biasing force to force the worm 2 toward the worm gear 4. Such a biasing force, for example, could be created by moving the far link inner pivot 24 and the near link inner pivot 27 closer to the worm gear axis 5 such that they are not symmetrical about the worm axis 3, thereby forcing the gears toward one another. This bias force may act in concert with or replace the radial bias spring 30 and the radial bias damper 32 as well as the active radial devices that will be described in reference to
An embodiment of the invention depicted in
Therefore, the radial biasing spring 30 and the radial damper 32 work together to position the bearing holder 22 and worm 2, offset from their nominal positions, toward the worm gear 4 to maintain zero clearance and backlash between the worm 2 and the worm gear 4 that would result due to manufacturing variations and component wear, that would result if worm axis 3 were fixed relative to worm gear axis 5. By eliminating the backlash, they also prevent noise that would result from the teeth of the worm 2 bouncing on and off from the teeth of the worm gear 4.
By being substantially perpendicular to the axis 3 of worm 2 the four link pivots 24, 25, 27 and 28 create a very high stiffness and strength of the worm 2 in the axial and transverse directions. Thus assuring movement of the worm 2 is constrained substantially perpendicular to the axis 5 of worm gear 4 in a plane orthogonal to the link pivot axes 24, 25, 27 and 28. This high stiffness, by keeping the worm 2 optimally oriented relative to the worm gear 4 aids in increasing efficiency and decreasing mesh loading. The third direction of motion, that in the radial direction of the worm 2 relative to the worm gear 4, can be independently set, as described above, to achieve the desired backlash elimination while minimizing gear-meshing friction.
Referring back to
Referring to
Two gears, worm gear 14 and worm 12 are shown meshed together with crossed-axis; such that worm gear axis 15 is maintained at a substantially constant shaft angle to worm axis 13. Accordingly, rotation of the worm 12 about worm axis 13 causes the worm gear 14 to rotate about the worm gear axis 15. The worm gear 14 is rotatable about bearing 90 that is movably attached to housing 36 which will be discussed in more detail below, it should be understood that the bearing 90 could be fixed relative to housing 36 while not departing from the scope of an embodiment of the present invention. Worm 12 is rotatably attached to bearings 40, such that it is free to rotate about the worm axis 13. A pair of axial preload springs 38 and axial preload dampers 39 may be included to load the worm 12 between the bearings 40 to prevent noise due to axial play and provide shock attenuation. These axial preload springs 38 and dampers 39 should be configured so as not to inhibit the motion of the worm axis 13 that will be discussed further below. The bearings 40 are fixedly attached to bearing holders 42 and 62 such that the worm 12 can rotate about worm axis 13, whereas bearing holders 42 and 62 cannot.
A four-bar-linkage, comprising far link 43 and near link 46, connects the bearing holder 42 to the housing 36. The far link 43 is on the far side of the worm axis 13 from the worm gear 14, whereas the near link 46 is on the near side of the worm axis 13 from the worm gear 14. The far link 43 is rotationally attached to the housing 36 by far link inner pivot 44 and to the bearing holder 42 by far link outer pivot 45. The near link 46 is rotationally attached to the housing 36 by near link inner pivot 47 and to the bearing holder 42 by near link outer pivot 48. The four pivots, namely, the far link inner pivot 44, the far link outer pivot 45, the near link inner pivot 47 and the near link outer pivot 48 are substantially perpendicular to the worm axis 13. Additionally the worm axis 13 is substantially midway between the far link inner pivot 44 and the near link inner pivot 47, similarly the worm axis 13 is substantially midway between the far link outer pivot 45 and the near link outer pivot 48. Thereby creating a four-bar-linkage that is symmetrical about axis 13.
The opposite end of the worm 12 is set up similarly with a four-bar-linkage, comprising far link 63 and near link 66, connects the bearing holder 62 to the housing 36. The far link 63 is on the far side of the worm axis 13 from the worm gear 14, whereas the near link 66 is on the near side of the worm axis 13 from the worm gear 14. The far link 63 is rotationally attached to the housing 36 by far link inner pivot 64 and to the bearing holder 62 by far link outer pivot 65. The near link 66 is rotationally attached to the housing 36 by near link inner pivot 67 and to the bearing holder 62 by near link outer pivot 68. The axes of the four pivots, namely, the far link inner pivot 64, the far link outer pivot 65, the near link inner pivot 67 and the near link outer pivot 68 are each substantially perpendicular to the sprung worm axis 13 and contained within planes parallel to a plane containing the fixed worm gear axis 15. Additionally the worm axis 13 is substantially midway between the far link inner pivot 64 and the near link inner pivot 67, similarly the worm axis 13 is substantially midway between the far link outer pivot 65 and the near link outer pivot 68. Thereby creating a four-bar-linkage that is symmetrical about axis 13.
The relative positions of the pivots of the links for the aforementioned four-bar-linkages can create a centering biasing force for the worm axis 13 or an offsetting biasing force of worm axis 13. This biasing force can be designed to maintain zero clearance between the teeth of the worm 12 and the teeth of the worm gear 14 that would exist due to build variation or develop over time due to wear if the worm axis 13 were fixed relative to the worm gear axis 15. Thereby eliminating the need for additional components to create a biasing force to force the teeth of the worm 12 toward the teeth of the worm gear 14.
Additionally radial biasing spring 50, 70 and radial dampers 52, 72 can be incorporated to force the worm 12 toward the worm gear 14 to maintain zero clearance between the teeth of the worm 12 and the teeth of the worm gear 14 that would exist due to build variation or develop over time due to wear if the worm axis 13 were fixed relative to the worm gear axis 15. The effective spring rate for the radial biasing springs 50, 70 is a compromise between a desired low stiffness, to minimize radial preload sensitivity, and to automatically adjust for build tolerance and component wear, and a desired high stiffness to minimize rattle due to the natural frequency of the linkage/gear mechanism. The radial biasing spring force and the radial damping could be performed by a single component located on either end of the worm 12.
By being substantially perpendicular to the axis 13 of worm 12 the eight link pivots 44, 45, 47, 48, 64, 65, 67 and 68 create a very high stiffness and strength of the worm 12 in the axial and transverse directions. This high stiffness, by keeping the worm 12 optimally oriented relative to the worm gear 14, aids in increasing efficiency and mesh loading. The motion in the radial direction of the worm 12 relative to the worm gear 14 can be independently set, as described above, to achieve the desired backlash elimination while minimizing gear-meshing friction.
An embodiment of gear set apparatus 81 of
A four-bar-linkage, comprising far link 83 and near link 86, connects the bearing holder 22 to the housing 10. The far link 83 is on the far side of the worm axis 3 from the worm gear 4, whereas the near link 86 is on the near side of the worm axis 3 from the worm gear 4. The far link 83 is rotationally attached to the housing 10 by far link outer pivot 85 and to the bearing holder 22 by far link inner pivot 84. The near link 86 is rotationally attached to the housing 10 by near link outer pivot 88 and to the bearing holder 22 by near link inner pivot 87. The axes of the four pivots, namely, the far link inner pivot 84, the far link outer pivot 85, the near link inner pivot 87 and the near link outer pivot 88 are substantially perpendicular to the sprung worm axis 3 and contained within planes parallel to a plane containing the fixed worm gear axis 5. Additionally the worm axis 3 is positioned closer to the far link inner pivot 84 and further from the near link inner pivot 87, this is done to assure that the perturbing force of the linkage acts to push the worm 2 towards the worm gear 4. Thereby creating a four-bar-linkage that is asymmetrical about axis 3.
The four-bar-linkage just described allows the bearing holder 22 to be moved rotationally about pivot bearing 7 resulting in the axis 3 pivoting about the virtual coupler pivot 11 (see
The four-bar-linkage of
A cushioned travel limiter 34 is positioned on the housing 10 to limit the travel of the bearing holder 22 in a radial direction. By limiting the travel of the bearing holder 22, the travel limiter 34 assures that a minimum mesh engagement of the worm 2 with the worm gear 4 will be maintained. By being cushioned, the cushioned travel limiter 34 minimizes contact noise when the bearing holder 22 makes contact with the travel limiter 34. Although the cushioned travel limiter 34 is positioned between the bearing holder 22 and the housing 10 in an embodiment, it could well have been positioned between either link 83 or 86 and the housing 10, or between either link 83 or 86 and the bearing holder 22 without deviating from the scope of the present invention.
An embodiment of gear set apparatus 91 of
Although the aforementioned outward extending four-bar-linkage has been described in reference to an embodiment of a gear set apparatus with one movable bearing and one pivoting bearing it should be understood that such an outward extending four-bar-linkage could also be applied to an embodiment of a gear set apparatus with movable bearings on both ends of the repositionable gear, similar to that shown in
Additionally an embodiment of the present invention could also incorporate a four-bar-linkage having; one link extending inward and the other extending outward, links that are not parallel, and links that are not of equal length while still being covered by the scope of the present invention.
An embodiment of the present invention with the axes of both gears movable relative to the housing is also depicted in
Referring to
Both the worm 2 and the worm gear 4 that the worm 2 is meshed with are located within a housing 410. The worm gear 4 and the axis 5 are held positionally constant relative to the housing 410, whereas, the worm 2 and the axis 3 are repositionable relative to the housing 410. The movement of the worm 2 and the axis 3 is constrained relative to the housing 410, to the worm gear 4, and to the worm gear axis 5 such that the movement of the worm 2 and the worm axis 3 are limited to a plane that contains both the worm axis 3 and a line commonly perpendicular to the worm axis 3 and the worm gear axis 5. The gear set 400 will maintain a substantially constant angle between the two gear axes when viewed along the direction of a line commonly perpendicular to the two axes 5, 3. Alternate cross-axis gear sets, such as non-enveloping helical, for example, may be used in place of the worm 2 and the worm gear 4 depicted in embodiments of this disclosure. Additional embodiments may have shaft angles other than 90 degrees while remaining within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
In an exemplary embodiment of the invention the worm gear 4 is fixed to a shaft 8 and has bearings (not shown) whose axis 5 orientation and location is fixed with respect to housing 410. Worm 2 is fixed to shaft 416 engaging pivot bearing 7 and bearing 20, such that it is free to rotate about worm axis 3. A pair of axial preload springs 8 and axial preload dampers 9, may be included to, load the worm 2 between the bearings 7 and 20 to prevent noise due to axial play and to provide shock attenuation. The bearings 7 and 20 on either end of the worm are mounted relative to the housing in significantly different arrangements. Bearing 20 is fixedly attached to a bearing holder 422 that is repositionable relative to the housing 410. The repositioning of bearing 20 can move the worm 2 toward or away from the worm gear 4. When the worm 2 is moved toward the worm gear 4 the movement may eliminate any clearance (also known as backlash) between the teeth of the worm 2 and worm gear 4 that may exist from build tolerances or from component wear, for example. The bearing 20 repositioning is controlled by a ball bearing 426 and V-shaped grooves 425 and 434 arrangement that will be described in detail below. The other worm bearing, namely pivot bearing 7, is not repositionable relative to the housing 410, however it does allow the opposite end of the shaft 416 located at the repositionable bearing 20 to move thereby creating a center point 411 substantially central to bearing 7.
The bearing 20 is connected to bearing holder 422 that includes an outward facing arcuate surface 424 with radius R1 and center point 411. A plurality of ball bearings 426 are positioned between the outward facing arcuate surface 424 and an inward facing arcuate surface 428 of a cap 429 fixed to the housing 410. The inward facing arcuate surface 428 has a radius of R2 and shares the center point 411 of the outward facing arcuate surface 424. The ball bearings 426 are held positionally by a ball carrier 431 positioned between the outward facing arcuate surface 424 and the inward facing arcuate surface 428. The groove 434, formed in the surface 428, and the companion groove 425, formed in surface 424; create a track for the ball bearings 426 so that the motion of the bearing holder 422 is in a single plane. The plane is such that it contains the worm axis 3 and a line commonly perpendicular to both the worm axis 3 and the worm gear axis 5. It should be noted that alternate embodiments could have a plurality of grooves and the grooves could have shapes other than the V-shape disclosed above. Additionally, alternate embodiments could use surfaces 424 and 428 that are substantially flat surfaces, such that R1=R2=infinity, while still remaining within the scope of the present invention.
A biasing member urges the bearing holder 422, depicted herein as the compression spring 30, in a radial direction toward the worm gear 4. In addition to the biasing of the bearing holder 422 the damper 32 is positioned between the housing 410 and the bearing holder 422 to dampen any movement of the bearing holder 422 in a direction away from the gear 4. This resistance to movement of the bearing holder 422 will resist the formation of backlash between the two gears 2 and 4 that could result if the bearing holder 422 were permitted to freely move away from the gear 4. Such assemblies as, the hydraulic damper assembly 110, the magnetorheological damper assembly 210 and the pancake solenoid assembly 310, for example, could replace the spring 30 and the damper 32 in alternate embodiments, while remaining within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Referring now to
Referring to
The biasing member 30, depicted here as a compression spring, and the damper 32 are functionally connected between the bearing holders 522 and the housing 510. The biasing member 30 and the damper 32 may include more than one of each, for example, a pair of biasing members 30 and a pair of dampers 32 may be employed in a single gear set 500. In such case one of the pair of biasing members 30 and one of the pair of dampers 32 may be functionally connected between the bearing holder 522 on one end of the worm 2 and the housing 510 while the other biasing member 30 of the pair and the other damper 32 of the pair is functionally connected between the other bearing holder 522 and the housing 510, for example. Regardless of the number of biasing members 30 and dampers 32 used their purpose is to urge the worm 2 toward the worm gear 4 and to damp any motion of the worm 2 in a direction away from the worm gear 4.
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring to
Although the force of the radial bias spring 30 is in a direction to force the teeth of the two meshing gears into each other, it may be possible under severe conditions for forces to overcome this spring force resulting, temporarily, in backlash that may permit rattling between the teeth of the gears resulting in audible noise. Referring now to
Where: TA is the torque acting on the worm gear, rp is the radius of the contact point for the worm gear, and φ is the angle between a radial line and the tangent plane 57 of gear teeth 58, which is also referred to as the pressure angle. Since Fs is the force acting to separate the two gears, and the worm has two substantially equal spaced bearings 7 and 20, in a simple analysis, the force acting on either bearing 7 or 20 is half the separation force Fs. Therefore, a worm gear torque TA large enough to create a separation force Fs equal to twice the force of that of the radial spring 30 may be sufficient to compress the radial spring 30 resulting in backlash and the potential for rattle noise. It should be noted that this analysis does not take into consideration a difference between separation forces on each end of the worm 2 that results from a worm pitch radius or a nonsymmetrical distribution of bearing loads that may result from an axial component of the contact force. Descriptions that take these factors into consideration will be presented below.
Referring to
FV=Fs(H±R cot φ)/L (2)
And by substituting for Fs the expression from formula (1), we get:
Where the +/− correlates to counterclockwise and clockwise rotational directions of the worm gear respectively. It should be noted that formula (3) holds true for gear systems that utilize four bar linkages such as the gear system 91, as well as for gear systems that use ball bearings, such as the gear system 400, for example, to permit movement of the movable bearing. Additionally, the ball bearing track shown in
Referring to
A radial bias spring 113 is compressed between piston spring seat 114 and spring stop 115 in response to bearing holder 22 pushing the piston shaft 112. The spring stop 115 is positionably attached to hydraulic housing 116, after assembly of the hydraulic assembly 110 to the housing 111, to create a desired preload force between the piston shaft 112 and the bearing holder 22. The desired force is enough to maintain zero clearance between the teeth of the worm 2 and the worm gear 4 under low torque conditions between the meshing gears.
A piston 117 slidably seals to the interior walls 118 of hydraulic housing 116 creating a first chamber 121 and a second chamber 122 for hydraulic fluid 120 contained therein. As the piston 117 is moved by the spring 115 hydraulic fluid 120, in the first chamber 121, is pumped through one-way valve 123 and variable valve 124 into the second chamber 122. The one-way valve 123 is configured to allow hydraulic fluid 120 to pass from the first chamber 121 to the second chamber 122 but not from the second chamber 122 to the first chamber 121 even if the variable valve 124 is closed. Through this porting the spring is able to push the piston shaft 112 and the bearing holder 22 to maintain no backlash between the meshed gears 2, 4 under conditions of low torque.
One-way valve 123 is configured to prevent the flow of hydraulic fluid 120 there through from the second chamber 122 to the first chamber 121 in response to the bearing holder 22 pushing against the piston shaft 112. Therefore, flow control of hydraulic fluid 120 from the first chamber 121 to the second chamber 122 is provided by the opening and closing of the variable valve 124 resulting in control of the damping stiffness for the movement of the bearing holder 22 relative to the housing 111. Such control can provide a means for preventing movement of the worm 2 away from the worm gear 4 and backlash and noise resulting therefrom.
Referring to
A radial bias spring 113 is compressed between piston spring seat 114 and spring stop 115 in response to bearing holder 22 pushing the piston shaft 112. The spring stop 115 is positionably attached to magnetorheological housing 216, after assembly of the magnetorheological damper assembly 210 to the housing 111, to create a desired preload force between the piston shaft 112 and the bearing holder 22. The desired force is enough to maintain zero clearance between the teeth of the worm 2 and the worm gear 4 under low torque conditions between the meshing gears.
A piston 117 slidably engages to the interior walls 218 of magnetorheological housing 216 creating a first chamber 121 and a second chamber 122 for magnetorheological fluid 220 contained therein. As the piston 117 is moved by the spring 115, magnetorheological fluid 220 in the first chamber 121 is pumped through the clearance between the piston 117 and the walls 218 into the second chamber 122. Through this fluid transfer the spring 115 is able to push the piston shaft 112 and the bearing holder 22 to maintain no backlash between the meshed gears under conditions of low torque.
Magnetorheological fluid 220 has the capability of changing viscosity when a magnetic field is applied to the fluid 220. The change in viscosity occurs very quickly with changes in the strength of the magnetic field and the viscosity is proportional to the strength of the magnetic field. It is these properties and the manipulation of them that makes magnetorheological dampers an attractive choice for damping devices.
The coil 221 forms an electromagnet that creates a magnetic field of varying strength depending upon the current supplied to the coil 221 via wires 223 and 224. The magnetorheological fluid 220 contained in the clearance between the piston 117 and the walls 218 is positioned within the magnetic field of the coil 221. The clearance between the piston 117 and the walls 218 is sized to allow for varying damping rates of the magnetorheological damper assembly 210 depending upon the viscosity of the magnetorheological fluid 220. Thus, controlling the current supplied to the coil 221 can control the damping of the magnetorheological damper assembly 210. Such control can provide a means for preventing movement of the worm 2 away from the worm gear 4 and backlash and noise resulting therefrom.
Referring to
The piston extension shaft 312 is slidably engaged in a piston 317 in piston bore 314. A shoulder 318 on the piston extension shaft 312 contacts the piston 317 limiting the travel of the piston extension shaft 312. A radial bias spring 313 is compressed between the piston extension shaft 312 and a spring stop 315. The spring stop 315 is movably attached to the piston 317 such that movement of the spring stop 315 relative to the piston 317 can adjust the force that the spring 313 applies to the piston extension shaft 312 and that the piston extension shaft 312 applies to the bearing holder 22 before being fixedly attached to the piston 317. Thus an adjustment to the spring force is achievable.
The piston 317 slidably engages to interior walls 319 of pancake solenoid housing 316. A first bumper 321, attached to coil/bumper retainer 327 that is movably attached to interior walls 319, limits the movement of the piston 317 in a direction towards the bearing holder 22. A second bumper 322, attached to coil/bumper retainer 328 that is movably attached to the interior walls 319 limits the movement of the piston 317 in a direction away from the bearing holder 22.
A coil 325, attached to the coil/bumper retainer 327 is located on the bearing holder side of the piston 317. The coil 325 creates a magnetic field in response to electrical current being supplied to the coil 325. The strength of the magnetic field is proportional to the amount of current supplied to the coil 325. The attractive force on the piston 317 by the magnetic field pulls the piston 317 in the direction of the bearing holder 22. A variable force can therefore be applied to the bearing holder 22 from the piston 317 through the piston extension shaft 312 in response to a variable current being supplied to the coil 325.
The pulling force on the piston 317 generated by a specific current in the coil 325 varies depending on the size of an axial air gap 326 between the coil 325 and the piston 317. Therefore, adjustability of the air gap 326 may be desirable. Positioning the pancake solenoid assembly 310 relative to the housing 111 such that contact of the bearing holder 22 to the piston extension shaft 312 pushes the piston 317 until it makes contact with the second bumper 322 sets a preliminary maximum air gap 326. Since the coil 325 and the first bumper 321 are attached to the coil/bumper retainer 327, movement of the coil/bumper retainer 327 relative to the interior walls 319 adjusts the size of the air gap 326. Fixing the coil/bumper retainer 327 to the interior walls 319 when the desired air gap 326 is attained will lock in the air gap 326.
With the above described methods two adjustments can be made independent of one another, specifically: the radial spring force, which creates a preload force to mesh the gears with no backlash at low torque levels, and the air gap size within the solenoid to allow for a predictable force versus applied solenoid current. Control of the solenoid force can provide a means for preventing movement of the worm 2 away from the worm gear 4 and backlash and noise resulting there from. A method for controlling the solenoid is using “current-mode” control. By measuring the solenoid current and feeding it back to either a hardware or a software current controller, the force can be controlled independently of coil resistance or coil temperature.
The three methods of active control described: hydraulic damping, magnetorheological fluidic damping and force control through an electronic solenoid, all provide two important features. First, they allow a means of control to increase the force required to separate two meshed gears, and second, they allow a means of control to reduce the force required to separate two meshed gears.
The ability to reduce the gear separation force is desirable to prevent high frictional losses that may result from too high a meshing force. Without the ability to reduce the force needed to separate the meshed gears, any flexing and movement of the gears, bearings, housings, etc. could result in ever increasing meshing loads.
A control system for when to, and how much to control an active member to increase the force required to prevent separation of the meshed gears and when to decrease it can use different parameters as input. For example the vibration of the gear set system can be monitored and used such that for high vibrational loads the separation prevention force can be increased and for low vibrational loads the separation prevention force can be reduced.
In an embodiment using an electric motor (not shown) to drive the worm 2, the torque to rotate the electric motor can be determined by the current required to drive the motor. Referring now to
and then multiplied by the motor's moment of inertia, Jm. Thus:
This estimate lags the actual acceleration torque by the tachometer time constant and the differentiator lag.
Due to the lags in the system, it is desirable to introduce a lead element into the solenoid control to compensate. It is possible to introduce the lead after the two motor torque component estimates are added as shown in
Because the separating force, Fs, is unidirectional and its direction does not depend on the direction of the motor torque, Tm, the motor torque, Tm, estimate needs to be processed through an absolute value function prior to use in solenoid force control.
Another method of dealing with transients and lags in the system is to use a peak-hold algorithm after the absolute value function. One embodiment of such an algorithm is a nonlinear low pass filter with different time constants for rising and falling signals. Next, by expressing torque of a gear, TA as a function of torque of a worm, Tm, for example,
TA=NATm (5)
Wherein, NA is an assist ratio of the gear system. Then, by replacing TA with equation (5) in equation (1), yields:
Thus, expressing the separation force, Fs, as a function of motor torque, Tm. This expression is a simplified version wherein the control force is set as the separation force. For nonsymmetrically loaded systems and systems wherein only one of the two bearings is movable, such as those described in reference to equation (3) above, the separation force, Fs, can be replaced with the expression for FV from equation (3), for example.
Finally, in order to maintain a minimum force, it is desirable to add a small offset to the force command, Fcmd, prior to the force or current control loop. As an alternative, the force command, Fcmd, could be limited to a minimum value, Fmin, thus:
Fcmd=Fs+Fmin (7)
The force command, Fcmd, may then be converted to a current command, Icmd, by a gain factor, Gsol, of the solenoid, which may be nonlinear.
Referring now to
Where: s is a Laplace operator, L is the inductance, and R is the resistance. The command current, Icmd, can be further fine tuned by taking into consideration the variable reluctance from the positional offset, x, and the mechanical variations, of the solenoid.
Embodiments of the invention may have some of the following advantages: meshed gears maintain in contact at all times eliminating backlash, clearances due to build variation and component wear are automatically adjusted for, friction of the gears is minimized since the meshing preload is kept at a low level, and audible noise due to gear rattle is minimized.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. provisional application 60/742,449, filed Dec. 5, 2005, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3220277 | Dixon | Nov 1965 | A |
3339426 | Karl-Heinz | Sep 1967 | A |
3463030 | Nuccel | Aug 1969 | A |
3641832 | Shigeta et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3848477 | Giandinoto et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3851538 | Denkowski et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
4040307 | Koster | Aug 1977 | A |
4227104 | Hamman | Oct 1980 | A |
4261218 | Eagan, Sr. | Apr 1981 | A |
4586393 | Mooney et al. | May 1986 | A |
4621933 | Musso | Nov 1986 | A |
4665765 | Heine | May 1987 | A |
4748865 | Umezawa et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4777411 | OConnor et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4813303 | Beezer et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4827790 | Bisiach | May 1989 | A |
4885948 | Thrasher, Jr. et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4979404 | Nakata et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4989472 | James, Sr. et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4993277 | Adam et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5027024 | Slayton | Jun 1991 | A |
5186068 | Heller | Feb 1993 | A |
5295730 | Rees | Mar 1994 | A |
5415595 | Nelson | May 1995 | A |
5445238 | Chikuma et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5472060 | Sano et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5475930 | Kimura | Dec 1995 | A |
5488851 | Rossi | Feb 1996 | A |
5794480 | Schonsteiner | Aug 1998 | A |
5832055 | Dewaele | Nov 1998 | A |
5834662 | Stoll et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5878832 | Olgren et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887353 | Beckingham | Mar 1999 | A |
5893427 | Bohner et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5934144 | Marinkovic | Aug 1999 | A |
5992259 | Fleytman | Nov 1999 | A |
6003397 | Yasuhira | Dec 1999 | A |
6016716 | Mauro | Jan 2000 | A |
6044723 | Eda et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6170350 | Behm | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6272942 | Gansesr | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6354395 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6357313 | Appleyard | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364049 | Iwasaki et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386059 | Mittendorf et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394220 | Kurokawa et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6460650 | Tsuboi et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6491130 | Honaga et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505071 | Zhu et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515915 | Derner | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6520042 | Jammer et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6523431 | Ozsoylu et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6543569 | Shimizu et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6550567 | Murakami et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6639760 | Dyer et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6643940 | Donath et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6644431 | Kuze et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6679350 | Shimizu et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6705176 | Ishii et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708796 | Kinme et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6725964 | Appleyard | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6761244 | Sano et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6763738 | Tsutsui et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6769507 | Murakami et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6776064 | Bucholz et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
20020053249 | Jammer et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020112555 | Chikaraishi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020148315 | Mittendorf et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020189892 | Appleyard | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020195893 | Kobayashi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040026160 | Shimizu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040029671 | Bock et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040029678 | Kayukawa et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040084865 | Kitami et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040094353 | Shimizu et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040163881 | Shiina et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040210365 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050097985 | Kato | May 2005 | A1 |
20050126333 | Dohles et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20080041178 | Ozsoylu et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100 51 306 | Apr 2002 | DE |
0 943 842 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1468897 | Oct 2004 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070125193 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60742449 | Dec 2005 | US |