This application claims priority to German Patent Application No. 10 2004 005 688.9, which was filed on Feb. 5, 2004.
The invention relates to a squeeze protection system for a window lifter system in a motor vehicle. The squeeze protection system includes a control that drives a drive motor to move a window pane along a path, and a detection unit that generates and communicates an image to the control. The control uses the image to detect an obstacle in the path of the window pane. Moreover, the invention relates to a method of controlling the window lifter system of the motor vehicle where the control drives the drive motor for the window pane, and the detection unit generates and evaluates an image to detect an obstacle in the path of the window pane.
In general, the invention provides active squeeze protection for a window lifter system that prevents an object, such as a hand of a vehicle occupant, from getting caught between an upper edge of a window pane and a window frame as the window pane is moved to a closed position. Active squeeze protection is distinguished from other systems in that an obstacle in the path of the window pane is detected solely based on the presence of the obstacle. In prior art systems, it is known to use an ultrasonic monitoring to detect the presence of an obstacle wherein a region through which the window pane moves is monitored. As soon as an obstacle is detected, a drive motor of the window pane is stopped or can even be driven in an opposed direction for a short time.
Another known passive system that can detect an obstacle in the path of the window pane is based on an effect of the obstacle on the window pane. Examples of such effects are a reduction of the rate of motion of the window pane, or an increase in motor current resulting from an elevated displacement resistance. These passive systems have the disadvantage that contact between the window pane and the obstacle must occur, before the squeeze protection system actually has a chance to detect the obstacle. Such necessary contact force will be additionally increased in practice because from the moment of detecting an obstacle until a standstill of the window pane is stopped, a certain amount of time will pass during which the window pane is further closed. This time span is a function of the inertia of masses of window lifter drive mechanisms. The biggest advantage of passive squeeze protection systems is their comparably low constructional effort.
With active systems, the advantage of a very early identification of an obstacle counters the disadvantage that it is relatively difficult to accommodate the components, required for the squeeze protection system, in the vehicle. Particularly, there is little space in the region of a guide for the window pane for installing a detection unit for a squeeze protection system in a practical way.
It is the object of the invention to improve an active squeeze protection system as well as to provide a method of controlling a window lifter system to the effect that control can be realized with low constructional effort.
To this end there is provided, according to the invention, a squeeze protection system that utilizes a detection unit that is part of a vehicle surrounding detection system. The vehicle surrounding system is used to detect a presence of another vehicle lying in a blind angle of the vehicle, otherwise known as a vehicle operator's blind spot. In the process, the squeeze protection system, according to the invention, utilizes the fact that, to an increasing degree, high-quality vehicles are equipped with surrounding detection systems. Vehicle surrounding detection systems are intended to assist the vehicle operator in critical situations, or to prevent critical situations from occurring. One typical example is a generation of a warning signal to indicate that another vehicle is lying in the blind angle of a rear view mirror when the surrounding detection system determines that the vehicle operator wishes to make a lane change.
Typical surrounding detection systems use radar systems, infrared systems, or cameras as a detection unit. In most cases, the detection units are integrated in outside rear mirrors of the vehicle. The invention is based on a realization that information, which in fact is provided by these surrounding detection systems for a totally different purpose, may also be used for an active squeeze protection system. In particular, the invention is based on the realization that without any additional effort a part of an image of the vehicle surroundings, which has been taken by the detection unit, can be used for the squeeze protection system. Specifically, an outer peripheral region of this image in the area of a guide for the respective window pane can be used to identify a presence of an obstacle in a path of the window pane.
If the detection unit is a camera, a marking is preferably applied along the guide of the window pane in a detection zone, and is used by the squeeze protection system to identify the presence of an obstacle.
In order to achieve the objective mentioned above, a method is provided to identify the presence of an obstacle by using a detection unit that takes an overall image of the surroundings of the motor vehicle. A control evaluates the overall image only in a detection zone, which is relevant for identification of an obstacle in the path of the window pane. This method takes into account the fact that an image area relevant for detecting the surroundings of the motor vehicle will never overlap with an image area that is relevant for the squeeze protection system. Thus, for either image area, a separate evaluation is possible, which does not interfere with the evaluation of the other image area.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, provision is made that upon each opening process of the window pane, a reference image of the detection zone on the guide of the window pane is recorded for the squeeze protection system. Thus, a current reference image will be available during the subsequent closing of the window pane so that changes in the detection zone, such as contaminations of a marking that is to be visually evaluated for example, does not affect the reliability of perceiving an obstacle.
Advantageous designs of the invention will be apparent from the sub-claims. These and other features of the present invention can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
In
Attached to the vehicle door 10 is an outside rear view mirror 18 in which a detection unit 20 is integrated. The detection unit 20 is part of a vehicle surrounding detection system with which, for example, another vehicle can be detected that lies in a “blind angle” of a vehicle, otherwise referred to as a driver's blind spot. As known, a driver has difficulty identifying the presence of another vehicle when the other vehicle is located in the blind spot.
The detection unit 20 can include a transmitter for transmitting waves as well as a sensor for receiving these waves, such as those used in a radar system or infrared system. The detection unit 20 could also include pick-up equipment system that utilizes a camera. For the purpose of the following explanation, it is assumed that the detection unit 20 includes a camera.
Dashed lines shown in
As shown in
The operation of the squeeze protection system will now be explained with the aid of
The image of the ambient zone 24 is made available to a vehicle surrounding detection system via a bus system 30. The vehicle surrounding detection system is designed to generate an alert, such as a warning light 34, for example, if in response to a forthcoming change of lanes, a vehicle is detected in the blind angle.
The image of the detection zone 22 is made available to a control 36 of the squeeze protection system. When the control 36 sees that an obstacle lies in the detection zone 22, such as a hand of a vehicle occupant, for example, the bus system 30 and a corresponding door control device will cause a signal to be generated to halt a drive motor 38 for the window pane 12 that has the obstacle. The control 36 may also re-open the window pane 12 by a small amount to entirely eliminate the risk of a hand getting caught.
Preferably, provision is made that with each opening process of the window pane 12, the control 36 evaluates the image of the detection zone 22 and stores or records the image. In this way, a current mapping of the guide 14 for the window pane 12 is obtained, which includes the currently existing configuration of the marking 16. This will identify any contamination or obscuring of the marking 16. If the window pane 12 is being closed again, then the control 36 compares the current image of the detection zone 22, delivered by the detection unit 20, with the previously stored image. If there are deviations in the image due to a now present obstacle, such as if the marking 16 is obscured in section, movement of the window pane 12 will be immediately stopped.
The image detection unit 28 has to provide an image of the detection zone 22 only when the window pane 12 is either opened (in this case for generating a current reference image) or when the window pane 12 is being closed (in that case for generating an image to be compared with the reference image). Most of the time it is sufficient to merely evaluate the ambient zone 24. Only in the event that a window pane 12 is being opened or closed simultaneously with a forthcoming changing of lanes will the system have to provide information about the detection zone 22 as well the ambient zone 24. This, however, does not pose a problem with the transmission bandwidth of common bus systems 30.
Depending on the geometry of a particular vehicle body, the detection unit 20 may also be used to monitor a window pane between a B-column and a C-column of the vehicle. If necessary, a marking may also be provided in a region of the C-column.
Although a preferred embodiment of this invention has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 005 688.9 | Feb 2004 | DE | national |