1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to E9-1-1 emergency phone calls. More particularly, it relates to handling emergency E9-1-1 calls using Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP).
2. Background of the Related Art
Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) is a technology that has been developed as an alternative packet-based telephony technology to the conventional switched telephony service (e.g. PSTN). VoIP takes advantage of high speed Internet data networks, and is able to provide low cost telephony services to end users. VoIP technology emulates a phone call, but instead of using a circuit based switched system such as the telephone network, utilizes packetized data transmission techniques most notably implemented in the Internet.
VoIP phone calls are routed to a VoIP voice gateway, from which they are passed on to their destination VoIP device. Conventional VoIP voice gateways (i.e., soft switches) are typically located in only a few places across the country. A soft switch is a programmable network switch that can process the signaling for all types of packet protocols. Also known as a ‘media gateway controller,’ ‘call agent,’ or ‘call server,’ such devices are used by carriers that support converged communications services by integrating signaling system No. 7 (SS7) type switched telephone signaling with packet networks. Softswitches can support, e.g., IP, DSL, ATM and frame relay.
Because VoIP is Internet Protocol (IP) based, call related information such as CallerID type services may not be available or accurate. A location of a given VoIP device may be statically provisioned to be at a given geographic location, or queried from a home location register (HLR) in a mobile system.
911 is a phone number widely recognized as an emergency phone number that is routed to emergency dispatch personnel and used to determine a location of a caller. Enhanced 911 (E911) is defined by the transmission of callback number and location information to the relevant public safety answering point (PSAP). A PSAP is the endpoint of an emergency services call. PSAPs are responsible for answering emergency services calls. E911 may be implemented for landline and/or mobile devices. Some Public Safety Access Points (PSAPs) are not enhanced, and thus do not receive the callback or location information from any phone, landline or mobile.
The problem is not necessarily solved with the use of a centralized emergency call center. In such case, when a VoIP customer places an emergency call such as an E911 call, the call may be routed to an emergency call center that is very far away, and in some instances half-way across the world to reach the centralized emergency call center. The VoIP E911 call must then be transferred to the relevant 911 center (public safety access point (PSAP)). However, this transfer must take place over the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) because such transfer cannot conventionally be gained to the PSAP's existing Enhanced 911 (E911) dedicated network where location and callback number of the originating 911 caller are provided. Moreover, note that even the call related information (e.g., CallerID) provided with the call would relate to the identity and location of the centralized call center—not to the callback number and certainly not the location of the customer originally dialing 911.
In particular, as shown in
In particular, as shown in
As technology progresses, dual mode wireless phones have emerged. A dual mode wireless phone is one that operates using CDMA or GSM technology when out on the open road, but which switches to a local area network such as a Wireless Fidelity (WiFi) network when within range at home or in the office. For instance, a wireless phone may join a WiFi network created in a home or office used by a wireless computer network, when within range of that WiFi network, to gain access to the Internet and thus communicate using voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP). Thus, dual mode phones operate as an ordinary cell phone as a mobile user traverses a cell network (e.g., a CDMA network), until you get home or to your office containing a WiFi network, at which time the cell phone drops use of the CDMA network and instead switches over to use of the WiFi network.
When a wireless phone is mobile and away from home or the office, latitude/longitude location information is pretty much the best that can be provided. However, when within a home or office on a WiFi network, it is preferable that more accurate location information such as MSAG format location information including street address be provided instead of merely lat/lon type location information.
Unfortunately, provision of MSAG format location information along with a WiFi wireless call presents significant expense to a wireless carrier. Instead, without change to the wireless carrier's network, lat/lon location information is the best that can be provided in all cases, even when the wireless dual mode phone is communicating over the Internet using a WiFi network.
In particular, as shown in
A user agent 180 provides service to the wireless VoIP device 190 so that the dual mode phone is provided with wireless Internet access. (“User agent” is a common name for a device that makes a VoIP call, e.g., a SIP phone, Skype™ on a Personal Computer, etc.)
The call then progresses over the Internet (Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP)) via a wireless fidelity (WiFi) access point 170. A WiFi access point 170 is, e.g., a wireless local area network hub in a house or office. The WiFi access point 170 provides Internet access to the wireless dual mode phone 190 typically via a wired connection to the Internet. (While described with respect to WiFi, the invention as described below relates equally to later embodiments of local area network hot spots (e.g., WiMAX, etc.).
A wireless VoIP base station controller 160 communicates with the WiFi access point 170 to provide circuit switched, time-division multiplexing (TDM) access to the VoIP call.
The user agent 180, WiFi access point 170 and a Wireless VoIP base station controller 160 use TCP/IP transport and session initiation protocol (SIP) protocols.
From the wireless VoIP base station controller 160, the VoIP E911 call is passed to a mobile switching center (MSC) 800. If part of a CDMA network, the MSC 800 passes an Origination Request (ORREQ) message (IS-41) to a 3rd Generation Partnership (3GPP2) mobile positioning center (MPC) 802 per the 3GPP2 joint standard #36 (J-STD-036). The ORREQ starts the process where location is ultimately obtained from a Position Determination Entity (PDE). The PDE consumes, or uses, the location information itself.
If part of a GSM network, the MSC 800 passes a subscriber location report (SLR) request to a Gateway Mobile Location Center (GMLC) 802. An SLR is a push of location. Thus, location is actually obtained before the message is sent. In such a GSM network, the MSC 800 actually gets the location back from the network element (SMLC) on the time division multiplex (TDM) side. The MSC 800 then provides the location to the GMLC 802.
The VoIP E911 call is then directed to a selective router 140 serving the designated public safety access point (PSAP)/911 network 195 for the determined lat/lon location.
In particular, as shown in
The voice service provider network 900 passes a SIP invite message to a VoIP positioning center 904. The SIP invite is used to get location information from the VPC 904. In this scenario, location is determined by the VPC 904, and the VPC 904 is used to make decisions based on that location. In particular, the VPC 904 sends signaling to the VSP 900 so that it can get the call to the right PSAP 195, but the location information itself is not sent back to the VSP 900. Rather, just signaling codes necessary to route the VoIP E911 call to the proper selective router 140 and PSAP 195 (via an emergency services gateway 902) are sent from the VPC 904 to the VSP 900. (An emergency services gateway (ESGW) is typically a function inside a standard media gateway. A media gateway is typically TCP/IP on one side, and TDM trunks on the other side.)
Location information itself in the embodiment of
Trials have been conducted in which a local exchange carrier (LEC) has permitted access to a selective router for the E911 network via the PSTN. In this trial, the LEC designated a specific 10-digit telephone number. A caller has their emergency call transferred to this 10-digit telephone number, which is then call-forwarded within the central office to the selective router, which then forwards the call to the correct PSAP based upon the digits dialed. However, this solution suffers the same significant drawbacks as that shown in
Thus while carriers continue to accommodate and indeed foster development of a nationwide VoIP telephone network, difficulties nevertheless abound, particularly with respect to provision of location of a VoIP caller to an emergency response center. As a result, wireless carriers wishing to offer dual-mode phones to customers must make significant technology investments and infrastructure upgrades to handle VoIP calls. (Dual-mode phones are capable of initiating mobile E9-1-1 calls using, e.g., Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) or code division, multiple access (CDMA), or even wireless fidelity (WiFi)). The desire is to handle use of such technologies in a VoIP communications network. However, the reality is that many wireless carriers continue to utilize switched technology equipment at least at the front end in communication with a VoIP caller. If an E911 call is placed, it is likely handled in the wireless carrier's network from a circuit switched interface. The present inventors realize that this causes a delay in the introduction of VoIP technology, and reduced competition from other carriers. Moreover, full compliance with national requirements may not be possible, e.g., the need to provide location and callback information.
There is the need for a simple and effective solution to providing easy and full access to the Enhanced 911 network of an emergency services provider (e.g., PSAP) from wireless VoIP users of a carrier utilizing a switched network.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, a call protocol conversion gateway comprises a module adapted to receive signaling system number 7 (SS7)-based call signaling. A module is adapted to convert the SS7 ISUP based call signaling into session initiation protocol (SIP)-based call signaling, and a module is adapted to pass the SIP call signaling to a voice over Internet (VoIP) positioning center.
A method of converting a VoIP call, passed over a switched telephone network, into a VoIP call for presentation to a public safety access point (PSAP) in accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention comprises receiving a voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) call from a VoIP phone via a local area network. The VoIP call is routed using signaling system number 7 (SS7) ISUP based call signaling. The SS7 ISUP based call signaling is converted into session initiation protocol (SIP) call signaling.
The present invention provides a signaling system number 7 (SS7) gateway device that translates between circuit-switched SS7 protocols and session initiation protocol (SIP) oriented protocol, allowing an E911 call initiated over a switched network to be routed by a VoIP network.
Use of an SS7 based gateway in accordance with the principles of the present invention, as opposed to the ORREQ technique shown in
The consumer benefits as well, as use of an SS7 gateway in a TDM network provides emergency services with a high quality MSAG type location rather than just a lat/long quality location, when in their time of need.
Using todays systems, most wireless carriers provide lat/lon quality information for all WiFi callers. While lat/lon information (e.g., cell tower location, etc.) is somewhat accurate, it does not give emergency services personnel total comfort in their locating the caller in a timely fashion. However, using an SS7 based gateway inserted into a VoIP platform including a voice positioning center (VPC), users can use a dual mode phone, dial 911, and MSAG quality location information can be provided to the designated PSAP, all without significant investment in a VoIP core by the wireless carrier. The home or office address (MSAG quality location information) can be given because it's based on the VoIP network.
Thus, wireless carriers may continue signaling the way they are today, i.e., using the J-STD-036 standard for CDMA and GSM in North America, but see benefits of a VoIP network core, i.e., provision of MSAG quality location data to a PSAP.
In one aspect of the invention, SS7 based J-STD-036/Transaction Capabilities Application Part (TCAP) signaling is translated to SIP for purposes of E911 call routing.
In particular, as shown in
From the wireless VoIP base station controller 160, the VoIP 911 call over a WiFi network is routed to the wireless carrier's Mobile Switching Center (MSC) 150. Ultimately, the 911 call is routed to an appropriate selective router 140, and then to the proper PSAP E911 network 195.
Importantly, in accordance with the principles of the present invention, 911 calls from the wireless MSC 150 are processed by an SS7 to SIP gateway 100 that accepts and sends SS7 TCAP [Transaction Capability Application Part]/J-STD-036 based signaling, but gateways the call signaling to session initiation protocol (SIP) signaling. Thus, the SS7 to SIP gateway 100 communicates with the MSC 150 to translate from J-STD-036 TCAP to SIP, i.e., between wireless technologies and VoIP location technologies.
Preferably the SIP signaling is compliant to a relevant standard, but there is currently no existing standardized SS7 interfaces allowed by the current standards for VoIP E911, i.e., National Emergency Number Association (NENA) i1/i2 standards for a voice over IP (VoIP) positioning center (VPC).
The SS7 to SIP gateway 100 translates call data received from the MSC 150 (e.g., calling party number) into relevant SIP INVITE parameters. The call data is then passed to a voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) positioning center (VPC) 120 as a VoIP call.
The VPC 120 is an application that determines the appropriate PSAP, based on the location of the 911 caller 190, returns associated routing instructions to the VoIP network, and provides the callback number to the PSAP 195 through an automatic location identifier (ALI). (An ALI is a database that relates a specific telephone number to an address. This database accepts a PSAP query with a telephone number and responds with an address. In the case of an ESQK, the ALI database steers (redirects) the query to the appropriate VoIP positioning center and steers the response back to the querying PSAP).
The SIP INVITE command from the SS7 to SIP gateway 100 preferably includes the following parameters:
The SS7 to SIP gateway 100 receives routing instruction from the VoIP positioning center (VPC) 120 and sends the routing key (e.g., emergency services query key (ESQK), a trunk select code (e.g., emergency services routing number (ESRN)), and optionally an i1 public switched telephone network (PSTN) number (e.g., last routing option (LRO)) back to the MSC 150. (The ESRN is a 10-digit number that specifies the selective router 140 to be used to route a call. The LRO is routing information sent by the VPC 120 that provides a “last chance” destination for a call, for example the contingency routing number (CRN) or a routing number associated with a national call center.)
The call then proceeds as it otherwise would for a wireless E911 call.
In particular, as shown in step 101 of
The E911 call requires routing to a Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) 195 based upon the street address of the caller (e.g., MSAG quality location data), which may be provisioned beforehand by the service provider based on, e.g., a billing address, etc. Alternatively, the E911 call can be routed to the correct PSAP 195 based on the absolute location of the caller, e.g., as determined by received data about their wireless access node such as wireless fidelity (WiFi) access point 170.
The MSC 150 sends out signaling data related to the wireless E911 call using the J-STD-036/TCAP protocol standard, including use of a TCAP message OriginationRequest (ORREQ). The TCAP OriginationRequest message should contain the calling party's number (CgPN) and called pary number (e.g., 911, etc.)
In step 102 of
In step 103 of
Preferably the SLDB is configured so that no modifications are required to the core conventional existing VoIP E9-1-1 network. The SLDB 130 is used to relate a Session Initiated Protocol (SIP) Universal Resource Identifier (URI) or a telephone number to a PSAP. In databases that use tables in lieu of GIS for routing determination, the address of the “subscriber” can be any valid street address within the jurisdiction of the PSAP.
In step 104 of
In step 105 of
In another aspect of the invention, SS7 based TCAP/MAP/Lg+ signaling is translated to SIP for purposes of E911 call routing.
In particular,
The 911 call from the wireless VoIP user 190 is routed to the wireless carrier's Mobile Switching Center (MSC) 150 via a user agent 180 for the wireless VoIP device, a WiFi access point 170, and a UMA network controller UNC 220.
This aspect of the invention creates an SS7 based gateway 200 that translates from mobile application part; interface specification Lg+ (MAP Lg+) to SIP. The SS7 based MAP-Lg+ to SIP gateway 200 is in communication with the MSC 150, and serves as a translator between wireless technologies and VoIP location technologies.
The SS7 based MAP-Lg+ to SIP gateway 200 translates the call data received from the MSC 150 (e.g., calling party number) into SIP INVITE parameters, which are then passed to a VPC 120 as a voice over IP (VoIP) call.
The SS7 based MAP-Lg+ to SIP gateway 200 receives routing instruction from the VPC 120 and sends a routing key (e.g., an emergency services query key (ESQK), trunk select code (e.g., emergency services routing number (ESRN), and (optionally) an i1 public switched telephone network (PSTN) number, e.g., last routing option (LRO) back to the MSC 150. The 911 call then proceeds as it would otherwise for a wireless E911 call.
in particular, as shown in step 201 of
The MSC 150 sends out signaling data related to the VoIP 911 call over a WiFi network using MAP/Lg+. Preferably the MAP message, i.e., “SubscriberLocationReport (SLR)” contains the calling party number (CgPN) and called party number (i.e., 911 etc).
In step 202 of
In step 203 of
In step 204 of
In step 205 of
In yet another aspect of the invention, SS7 based ISUP signaling is translated to SIP, e.g., for purposes of E911 call routing.
In particular,
The 911 call from the wireless VoIP user 190 is routed to the wireless carrier's Mobile Switching Center (MSC) 150 as shown. The SS7 based ISUP to SIP conversion gateway 300 then translates from integrated services user part (ISUP) protocols into SIP protocol signaling.
The SS7 based ISUP to SIP conversion gateway 300 is in communication with the MSC 150, and serves as a translator between wireless and VoIP location technologies. The SS7 based ISUP to SIP conversion gateway 300 translates call data received from the MSC 150 (e.g., calling party number) into appropriate SIP INVITE parameters, which are then passed to the VPC 120 as a VoIP call.
The SS7 based ISUP to SIP conversion gateway 300 receives routing instruction from the VPC 120 and sends the routing key (e.g., the emergency services query key (ESQK), trunk select code (e.g., emergency services routing number (ESRN), and (optionally) an i1 public switched telephone network (PSTN) phone number, e.g., last routing option (LRO) back to the MSC 150. The VoIP/WiFi 911 call then proceeds as it would for a wireless E911 call.
In particular, as shown in step 301 of
The MSC 150 sends out signaling data related to the call using ISUP. Preferably, the IAM contains the calling party number (CgPN) and called party number (e.g., 911, 411, etc.)
In step 302 of
In step 303 of
In step 304 of
In step 305 of
Accordingly, use of an SS7 to SIP conversion gateway in accordance with the principles of the present invention provides for a low cost architecture that has the ability to ease the transition from circuit switched routing of wireless calls (including emergency calls such as E911) to Internet Protocol (IP) based routing of wireless calls (i.e., voice over IP (VoIP)).
The invention has applicability to wireless carriers, and in particular to the use of dual-mode phones over local area wireless networks such as WiFi networks.
While the invention has been described with reference to the exemplary embodiments thereof, those skilled in the art will be able to make various modifications to the described embodiments of the invention without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.
The present application is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/417,128, entitled “SS7 ISUP TO SIP BASED CALL SIGNALING CONVERSION GATEWAY FOR WIRELESS VOIP E911”, filed on May 4, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,155,109; which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/788,713, filed Apr. 4, 2006, entitled “SS7 ANSI-41 TO SIP BASED CALL SIGNALING CONVERSION GATEWAY FOR WIRELESS VoIP E911”, to Mitchell, the entirety of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4625081 | Lotito | Nov 1986 | A |
5712900 | Maupin | Jan 1998 | A |
5937344 | Zicker | Aug 1999 | A |
6275937 | Hailpern | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6535743 | Kennedy, III | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556816 | Gafrick | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6675017 | Zellner et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6721396 | Chin | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6865266 | Pershan | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6925504 | Liskov | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7031724 | Ross | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7194249 | Phillips | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7277938 | Duimovich | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7516198 | Appala | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7526563 | Ingimundarson | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7617287 | Vella | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627331 | Winterbottom | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7684782 | Ashley | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7822391 | Delker | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7822871 | Stolorz | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7895263 | Kirchmeier | Feb 2011 | B1 |
20020055924 | Liming | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069079 | Vega | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020086659 | Lauper | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099802 | Marsh | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111159 | Faccin | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020113797 | Potter | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020136364 | Stumer | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141386 | Minert | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154221 | Ishimaru | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174073 | Nordman | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030063714 | Stumer | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030063730 | Woodring | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081752 | Trandal | May 2003 | A1 |
20030081754 | Esparza | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115261 | Mohammed | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125021 | Tell et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135493 | Phelan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163483 | Zingher | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030186709 | Rhodes | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030187803 | Pitt | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030222901 | Houck | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040064500 | Kolar et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093217 | Yeh | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107143 | Niemi | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040156394 | Westman | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040157175 | Matsumoto | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040184584 | McCalmont | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040190497 | Knox | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203919 | Ross | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040242191 | Hossain | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040247090 | Nurmela | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050031095 | Pietrowicz | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039135 | Othmer | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047399 | Lee et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071251 | Linden | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050144322 | Miyajima | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148353 | Hicks, III et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050181805 | Gallagher | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186948 | Gallagher | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188078 | Kotzin | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190892 | Dawson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195954 | Klein | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201358 | Nelson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202799 | Rollender | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213537 | Ingimundarson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215233 | Perera | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216300 | Appelman | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050272424 | Gallagher | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050272449 | Gallagher | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287979 | Rollender | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060044407 | Barbeau | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060073812 | Punaganti Venkata et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079236 | Del Pino | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060099935 | Gallagher | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106774 | Cohen | May 2006 | A1 |
20060135177 | Winterbottom | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060154665 | Svensson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184617 | Nicholas | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189303 | Rollender | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205383 | Rollender | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206610 | Ling | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060236258 | Othmer | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070008885 | Bonner | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027997 | Polk | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070060097 | Edge | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070104183 | Bakke | May 2007 | A1 |
20070190968 | Dickinson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201623 | Hines | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202844 | Wilson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070218871 | Bonner | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070238448 | Gallagher | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080045250 | Hwang | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080080488 | Marsico | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080192731 | Dickinson | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208671 | Ehrlich | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080268809 | Busin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090198733 | Gounares | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204470 | Weyl et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204600 | Kalik | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090237210 | Ciesla | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100010860 | Bose | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100198933 | Smith | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100233991 | Crawford | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262668 | Piett | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110207429 | Maier | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120079600 | Kellerman | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2004021726 | Mar 2004 | DE |
PCTIB0204436 | Oct 2002 | WO |
PCTUS04042456 | Dec 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report received in PCT/US2012/067857 dated Feb. 20, 2013. |
International Search Report received in PCT/US2012/67689 dated Feb. 22, 2013. |
International Search Report received in PCT/US2012/066313 dated Feb. 4, 2013. |
International Search Report received in PCT/US2012/00266 dated Aug. 3, 3012. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/imsi, Wikipedia Encyclopedia, International Mobile Subscriber Identity, pp. 1-4, printed on Sep. 4, 2008. |
Harry Newton, Newton's Telecom Dictionary, Feb. 2000, Telecom Books, 16th edition, p. 427. |
International Search Report received in PCT/US2006/27658 dated Feb. 13, 2007. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, Feb. 14, 2008. |
Winterbottom et al., GEOPRIV PIDF-LO Usage Clarification, Considerations and Recommendations, Geopriv, Feb. 12, 2005, pp. 1-19. |
European Search Report in Appl. No. EP07 71 6216 dated Dec. 12, 2009. |
Zehua et al., “On Querying Geospatial and Georeferenced Metadata Resources in G-Portal,” IEEE Comp. SOC, May 31, 2003, pp. 245-255. |
Peterson et al., “A Presence-Based GEOPRIV Location Object Format; rfc4119,txt,” Neustar, Dec. 1, 2005, pp. 1-23. |
Winterbottom, et al., “GEOPRIV PIDF-Lo Usage Clarification, Considerations and Recommendations; draft-ietf-geopriv-pdif-lo-profile-00.txt,” Nortel, Jul. 2, 2005, pp. 1-31. |
Berners-Lee, et al., “Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Generic Standard, Internet Engineering Task Force,” Day Software, Jan. 1, 2005, pp. 1-61. |
Linden, Greg, Geeking with Greg, Exploring the Future of Personalized Information, glinden.blogspot.com, pp. 1-2. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120188943 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60788713 | Apr 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11417128 | May 2006 | US |
Child | 13437244 | US |