The present invention provides a pharmaceutical delivery device comprising a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue, such as misoprostol or analogues or derivatives thereof and a polyurethane hydrogel; and also uses and methods of preparation of such a device.
Prostaglandins are a group of lipids, which are modified fatty acids attached to a 5-membered ring and with biological/pharmaceutical activities suitable for a variety of therapeutic uses. Such uses include reproductive health disorders and disorders linked to inflammatory response. However, prostaglandins are often unstable under ambient conditions and have sometimes proved difficult to store and produce in a form suitable for pharmaceutical/therapeutic use.
A prostaglandin formulation, which allows controlled release of the active compound for therapeutic use is described in patent specifications GB 2047093 and GB 2047094. Such formulations use hydrogels, which are known sustained release delivery vehicles; and in particular, “solid” cross-linked polyurethane materials having the ability to swell and absorb several times their own weight of water whilst retaining their physical integrity. The formulations have been provided as pessaries to deliver dinoprostone (a PGE2 prostaglandin) to the cervix to ripen it prior to the induction of labour, and is available under the trademarks Propess® and Cervidil®. The pessary is enclosed in a net pouch and usually remains in place in the cervix for up to 24 hours. However, this prostaglandin, even when loaded into such hydrogels, is somewhat unstable at room temperature and therefore the pessary is generally stored at temperatures of around −20° C.
Various attempts have been made to provide stabilised formulations of prostaglandins in general. PGE2 prostaglandins tend to be more unstable than PGE1 prostaglandins.
Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin analogue; in particular, a cytoprotective prostaglandin PGE1 analogue. Misoprostol is a compound represented by the following stereoisomeric formulae:
Misoprostol in its physical state is an oil, which is difficult to formulate and unstable at room temperature. Misoprostol possesses mucosal protective properties and is an inhibitor of gastric acid secretion. Misoprostol has been used previously in the treatment and prevention of gastric ulcers, in particular NSAID-induced ulcers.
Misoprostol may be obtained commercially or prepared by known reaction schemes, such as by the methods taught in U.S. Pat. No. 3,965,143, for example.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,301,146 describes a solid state dispersion of misoprostol and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) or hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC). These formulations may be in the form of a tablet or capsule.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,935,939 describes a stabilised solid state dispersion of misoprotol and in particular, the preparation of stabilised misoprostol using amorphous or semi-crystalline excipients.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,642,274 discloses use of a large number of prostaglandins, including misoprostol. However, there is no focus on the problems of formulating misoprostol. Hydrogels are mentioned but these are semi-liquid compositions or low melting compositions suitable for suppositories.
US Patent Publication 2003/0050620 discloses prostaglandins in general but not PGE1 analogues. Hydrogels are mentioned but the problems of formulating PGE1 analogues are not addressed.
Other patent publications dealing with prostaglandins and/or hydrogel carriers include U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,588, U.S. Pat. No. 6,589,549, US 2002/0076441, U.S. Pat. No. 6,685,962, US 2003/0021845, US 2003/0049320 and US 2003/0064088.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a PGE1 formulation showing increased stability properties compared with unformulated misoprostol; and in particular to provide a solid state misoprostol formulation which has increased storage stability at room temperature.
The present invention is based on the unexpected observation that the stability of a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue, misoprostol, at room temperature is increased when formulated in a polyurethane hydrogel. This increased stability is surprising and is not exhibited by other prostaglandins, such as dinoprostone, when formulated in this way.
In a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a pharmaceutical delivery device comprising a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue or derivative thereof in a polyurethane hydrogel.
The pharmaceutical delivery device allows the effective sustained delivery of the pharmaceutical, a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue, such as misoprostol, from the solid state hydrogel. Typically, the pharmaceutical is intended to be delivered to a patient (human or animal).
Generally, the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue is dispersed throughout the polyurethane hydrogel matrix.
The polyurethane hydrogel of the pharmaceutical delivery device of the present invention extends to polyurethane hydrogels well known to the man skilled in the art. Without wishing to be bound by theory, said polyurethane hydrogels when hydrated form a gel but do not dissolve. They are solid in the sense that, whilst being swellable, they retain their physical integrity without becoming a liquid or semi-liquid gel. The polyurethane hydrogels are capable of being loaded with the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue, such as misoprostol. The polyurethane hydrogels may be cross-linked or linear polymers. Furthermore, the polyurethane hydrogels may be swollen in a “wet state” or unswollen in a “dry” or “desiccated” state in the device of the invention. These states will be described further below.
The polyurethane hydrogel used in the delivery device of the present invention may be of the type disclosed in GB 2047093 and GB 2047094. These patent specifications disclose cross-linked polyurethane hydrogels.
Alternatively, the delivery device of the present invention may include a polyurethane hydrogel, as described in patent specification WO 2004/029125. This patent specification discloses linear polyurethane hydrogels. Such linear polyurethane hydrogels may be obtained by reacting a polyethylene glycol and a diol or other difunctional compound with a difunctional isocyanate.
Without wishing to be bound by theory and unless otherwise stated herein, it should be understood that the properties and variables of the hydrogels as described in GB 2047093, GB 2047094 and WO 2004/029125 are applicable to the present invention.
Typically, the cross-linked polyurethane hydrogel (as described in GB 2047093 and GB 2047094) is prepared from a long chain polyethylene glycol (e.g. PEG 2000, 4000, 6000 and 8000, which has been extensively dried), a triol (for example, hexanetriol) as cross-linking agent and a diisocyanate (such as dicyclohexyl methane diisocyanate). The mixture is cured at elevated temperatures in a mould.
Typically, the linear polyurethane hydrogel is prepared from a) a polyethylene oxide, b) a difunctional compound and c) a difunctional isocyanate (as described polyurethane hydrogel is swellable in water and suitable as a carrier for the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue in the delivery device of the present invention. Furthermore, the linear polyurethane hydrogel of the delivery device of the present invention may be loaded with poorly water-soluble pharmaceutical agents, such as a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue, including misoprostol, for example when such agents are dissolved in a common solvent with the polymer. An example of a solvent is ethanol. The resultant solution may then be cast into any desired solid forms.
The polyurethane hydrogels for use in the present invention provide water-swellable polyurethane polymers having swellabilities, for example up to 500%, up to 800% or even about 1,000%. Percent (%) swelling, is understood to mean the increase in weight of the swollen polymer divided by the weight of the dry polymer. Usually, the polymer is swellable in the range 200% to 2000%, for example 250 to 1700%. The linear polyurethane hydrogels are also soluble in certain organic solvents, such as dichloromethane, which allows the hydrogel to be dissolved and cast into films or coatings. Therefore, as mentioned above, it also allows active agents of poor water solubility but which are soluble in organic solvents, such as misoprostol, to be loaded into the polymer.
Polyethylene oxides contain the repeat unit (CH2CH2O) and are conveniently prepared by the stepwise addition of ethylene oxide to a compound containing a reactive hydrogen atom. Polyethylene glycols are prepared by the addition of ethylene oxide to ethylene glycol to produce a difunctional polyethylene glycol structure HO(CH2CH2O)nH wherein n is an integer of varying size depending on the molecular weight of polyethylene oxide. For example, polyethylene oxides used in the linear polyurethane hydrogels of the present invention are generally linear polyethylene glycols i.e. diols having a equivalent weight of 1500 to 20,000, particularly 3000 to 10,000 and especially 4000 to 8000. Molecular weights are usually in the region 4000 to 35,000.
In this description the term “equivalent weight” is used as meaning the number average molecular weight divided by the functionality of the compound.
The difunctional compound is reactive with the difunctional isocyanate, and is typically a difunctional amine or diol. Diols in the range C5 to C20, preferably C8 to C15 are preferred. Thus, decane diol has been found to produce particularly good results. The diol may be a saturated or unsaturated diol. Branched diols may be used but straight chain diols are preferred. The two hydroxy groups are generally on terminal carbon atoms. Thus, preferred diols include 1,6-hexanediol, 1,10-decanediol, 1,12-dodecanediol and 1,16-hexadecanediol.
The difunctional isocyanate is generally one of the conventional diisocyanates, such as dicyclohexylmethane-4,4-diisocyanate, diphenylmethane-4,4-diisocyanate, 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate etc.
The ratio of the components (a) to (b) to (c) of the linear polymer described above (in terms of equivalent weights) is generally in the range 0.1-1.5 to 1 to 1.1-2.5, particularly 0.2-0.9 to 1 to 1.2-1.9. A preferred range is 0.5-0.9 to 1 to 1.5-1.9. Of course, the skilled man through reasonable experimentation would determine the best ratio of ingredients to give the desired properties. The amount of component (c) is generally equal to the combined amounts of (a) and (b) to provide the correct stoichiometry.
Linear polyurethane hydrogels produced at extreme ends of the ranges may not necessarily give optimal properties. For example, high amounts of (a) polyethylene oxide may undesirably lead to the polymer being water-soluble. Small amounts may reduce the percentage swelling. Generally, the ratio of (a) polyethylene oxide to (b) difunctional compound is preferable 0.1-1.5 to one, preferably 0.2-0.9 to one.
The linear polyurethane hydrogels are generally produced by melting the previously dried polyethylene glycol together with the difunctional compound (e.g. diol) at a temperature of around 85° C. A catalyst such as ferric chloride is incorporated. The molten mixture is dried under vacuum to remove excess moisture and the diisocyanate added thereto. The reaction mixture is then poured into billet moulds and cured for a specified time. Thus, the linear polyurethane hydrogel is initially formed as a moulded solid. However, the linear polyurethane hydrogels of the delivery device of the present invention are soluble in certain organic solvents. This allows the polymer to be dissolved and the resultant solution cast to form films. The solution may also be employed for coating granules, tablets etc., in order to modify their release properties. Alternatively, the solution can be poured into a non-solvent so as to precipitate polymer/active microparticles.
Generally, the polyurethane hydrogel is washed in water, followed by washing in an ethanol:water mixture before being loaded with a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue by soaking the hydrogel in an aqueous solution of a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue of required concentration for a time sufficient for uptake of the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue to occur, followed by drying the hydrogel down to the required water content. Typically, the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue is dissolved in organic solvent, such as an ethanol:water solvent, before being loaded into the polyurethane hydrogel.
The term “synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue” as used herein is understood to cover the compound generally known as misoprostol and any analogues or derivatives thereof. Analogues or derivatives thereof are intended to encompass structural analogues or derivatives of the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue which maintain the essential pharmaceutical activity of the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue, including misoprostol; for example, prostaglandins of different chain length, or different salts or esters which maintain pharmacological activity. These may also encompass stereoisomers of the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue, such as misoprostol. It will be understood that the term synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue (or misoprostol) is not intended to encompass naturally occurring PGE1. Synthetic PGE1 analogues or derivatives may be in the form of an ester; such as a methyl ester: whereas said naturally occurring PGE1 is normally in the acid form. One or more C1-6 alkyl groups (particularly methyl) may be attached to the prostanoic acid carbon chain, especially at the 15-position. Typically, misoprostol PGE1 analogue or derivative in its physical state is an oil, whereas naturally occurring PGE1 is in a crystalline form.
Misoprostol should be understood to mean (11α,13E)-(±)-11,16-Dihydroxy-16-methyl-9-oxoprost-13-en-1-oic acid methyl ester or analogue(s) or derivative(s) thereof, as described herein. Preferably, misoprostol has the formula C22H33O5 or the general structure as hereinbefore described.
Typically, misoprostol has a molecular weight of around 380.
The delivery device of the present invention may be in the form of a suppository, a pessary for vaginal use, a buccal insert for oral administration, an implant etc. Preferably, the device is in the form of a comfortable unit, which is flexible enough (particularly when swollen) to be accommodated within a body cavity: for example, buccal cavity in intimate contact with the mucosal membrane. Preferred shapes include sheets, discs, ovals, kidney shapes, strips and cylinders. Generally, the smallest dimension is in the range 5-15 mm and the longest dimension in the range 10-25 mm. Preferred thicknesses are in the range 0.5-5 mm, especially 0.5-2.5 mm, particularly 1-2.5 mm and more particularly 0.8-1.5 mm. It will be understood, however, that length and thickness of said delivery device may be altered and designed to preferred sizes per individual patient.
The delivery device of the present invention has a number of applications including the treatment of schizophrenia, prevention of gastric ulcers, mucositis and orthodontic applications. Typically, the device is used for its action upon the female reproductive system of both human and non-human animals. Preferably, the device of the present invention is used in the induction of labour. The device may also be used for first and second trimester abortion and the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH).
The pharmaceutical delivery device of the present invention is intended to administer a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue to a patient, remaining in place until partial or complete delivery of the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue has occurred. The spent delivery device may then be removed from the patient. Advantageously, the delivery device may further comprise means for removal of the device from a patient. For example, using means well known to the person skilled in the art, such as removal means used for conventional tampons for vaginal use.
An objective of the present invention is the stabilisation of a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue in the delivery device of the present invention, especially at temperature above +4° C., particularly at room temperature of around +20° C. The synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue-containing delivery device of the present invention allows the controlled release of a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue into a patient. At low water contents, the delivery device may adhere to the mucosal membrane of a patient. The synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue may be absorbed systemically or may exert a local action on adjacent tissue structures. Typical autoadhesive properties for improved means of delivery of said synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue to a patient are described in WO 00/32171.
Typically, stabilisation of synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue is understood to mean the increased stability or, conversely, the decreased degradation of this prostaglandin at temperatures above 4° C. within the delivery device of the present invention. For example, wherein the percent dose of the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue present within the delivery device of the present invention after storage at temperatures above 4° C. (preferably room temperature of around 20° C.) is within a range of 90-100% of initial dose of the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue added to the delivery device of the present invention. The stability also depends on the water content of the hydrogel.
If necessary, penetration enhancers, as known in the art, may be employed to assist the rate of transmucosal delivery, depending on the nature of the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue, for example, its lipophilic or hydrophilic characteristics, size and molecular weight. Generally, the more lipophilic the compound, the better the absorption. The nonionised form of a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue appears to be best for absorption. In view of the rapid and effective delivery through mucosal tissues, penetration enhancers may not be required. Such penetration enhancers are known from topical application to skin tissue, which constitutes a more significant barrier to absorption. Weak acids and some detergents have been used as penetration enhancers.
The release properties of the polyurethane hydrogel of the delivery device of the present invention may be modified by applying a coating thereto. The synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue may be included in a coating as well as in the hydrogel matrix in order to provide a desired delivery profile.
The polyurethane hydrogel of the delivery device of the present invention in use may be in a swollen or “wet” state or unswollen in a “dry” or “desiccated” state as hereinbefore described. For example, in swollen state water content may be 30-40% by weight. Preferably, 25% by weight or less. More preferably, 5-10% by weight. Alternatively, in unswollen or dry state the polyurethane hydrogel usually contains little or no water. For example, about 1-2 wt %. Preferably, the water content of the hydrogel is about or less than 1%. More preferably, the water content is around 0.5% to around 0.8%. Even more preferably the water content of the polyurethane hydrogel is about or less than 0.1%.
Advantageously, the delivery device of the present invention in its “dry” state lends to easier storage before use, including at temperatures above 4° C., such as room temperature of 20° C., without loss of or reduced synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue activity. Indeed, as hereinbefore described, the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue displays increased stability when formulated in the polyurethane hydrogel delivery devices of the present invention. Typically, said dry state may contain a water content of around 0.5% to around 0.8% and be stored with a desiccant to further reduce the water content of the delivery device.
Typically, the water content of the hydrogel is less than or about 0.1% when said hydrogel is desiccated or in “dry” state. Generally, the desiccated hydrogel may absorb water from the surroundings after administration.
Typically, the delivery device of the present invention comprises: synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue in a dose of about 25 to 400 micrograms (μg); has a thickness of around 0.4 to 1.5 mm; and has a weight of around 120 to 500 milligrams (mg). Typically, a dose of synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue of around 100 μg is contained within a polyurethane hydrogel of around 241 mg weight and of around 0.8 mm thickness.
In a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of preparing the pharmaceutical delivery device of the present invention, comprising the steps of:
a) contacting a polyurethane hydrogel with an aqueous solution of synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue such as to swell the hydrogel;
b) removing the swollen hydrogel from the solution; and
c) drying the hydrogel to a desired water content.
In a yet further aspect of the present invention there is provided use of the pharmaceutical delivery device of the present invention for controlled administration of a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue to a human or animal.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of figures and examples as follows:
FIG. 1—shows a graph displaying the results of enhanced stability of polyurethane hydrogel containing 100 μg misoprostol (desiccated and undesiccated batches) at 25° C. The results are compared against the stability of Misoprostol Oil standard (in the absence of polyurethane hydrogel) which degrades with time at 25° C.
The methods and results presented herein refer generally to pessaries, which are polyurethane hydrogels (as described previously in GB 2047093 and GB 2047094, and WO 2004/029125) loaded with varying amounts of misoprostol, as described.
1.1 Loading Protocol for Misoprostol Inserts
Purification
0.8 mm Polymer slices are purified by submerging in an excess of water for a first and second wash for a number of hours. The water is decanted after each wash and then the units are finally washed in an ethanol (25%):water mixture for a further few hours. This solution is again discarded.
Loading
The correct amount of misoprostol is weighed to achieve the desired final potency and dissolved in ethanol (25%): water along with the Butylated Hydroxy Anisole (BHA) used to stabilise the polymer. Sufficient of this solution is made to submerge the previously washed units and the units left to rotate in a closed vessel for a period at 4° C. The excess loading solution is decanted off and the units shaken dry.
Drying
Loaded inserts are placed in a tablet coating pan and rotated at ambient temperature and air and finally dehumidified air. Units may then be inserted into a retrieval tape and packaged appropriately. The solvent remaining in the units (water) is typically less than 1% at this stage (about 0.5-0.8%). The addition of a desiccated label inside the packaging reduces this down to 0.1-0.2%.
1.2 Measuring Misoprostol Potency Degradation Product/Impurity and BHA Content
The desiccated batches were packaged in preformed foil sachets containing desiccant labels.
Samples were taken at random from the batch. A minimum of 20 inserts were used for full testing.
100-400 μg Doses
10 Pessaries
HPLC Apparatus (ultraviolet absorbance detector at 280 nm with 6 mm pathlength)
Waring Blender with Stainless Steel Mini-Cup (110 ml) and Cap
Mobile Phase
Post Column Derivatising Agent
Mechanical Flask Shaker
BHA Misoprostol Standard Solution Preparation
The series of concentrations required for misoprostol standard preparation is described below. However, prior to the dilution to the mark of the misoprostol standard, pipette a volume of BHA stock solutions ca 40 μg/ml and 70 μg/ml prepared in mobile phase that would represent 10% of the total volume of the flask, i.e., 20 ml in 200 ml and 50 ml in 500 ml for respective extraction volume scenarios.
Misoprostol Standard Solution Preparation
A level one standard of approximately 8 mg and a level two standard of approximately 12 mg of misoprostol reference standard was accurately weighed and added each to separate 100 ml volumetric flask containing approximately 50 ml of 70% methanol mobile phase. Flasks were placed in an ultrasonic bath for 5 minutes and agitated on a flat bed shaker for no less than one hour. Standard flasks were diluted to volume with 70% methanol mobile phase. Depending on the target potency of the particular batch, the two standard solutions were diluted with 70% mobile phase using the guidelines outlined in table 1 below.
Sample Preparation—for 100-400 μg Doses
10 pessary units were swollen in 40 ml of mobile phase. The units were then transferred to a Waring blender, mascerated and quantitatively transferred to the appropriate volumetric flask through washing with mobile phase. The beaker used to swell the units was washed with mobile phase into the volumetric flask (see table 2). The flask and its contents were then shaken on a flat bed shaker for 2 hours, after 1 hour the neck of the flask was washed down with mobile phase. The flask was then diluted to the mark with mobile phase and contents allowed to settle and equilibriate for 20 minutes prior to sampling into HPLC vials.
Misoprostol potency, together with the related impurities 8-iso misoprostol, dehydroxy misoprostol type A and unidentified impurity peaks were quantified with reference to the area response factor from the prepared misoprostol standard solutions using the following expression.
Note Standard Concentrations for Calibration are Expressed in Terms of μg Misoprostol Per ml
Misoprostol potencies and degradation product contents are expressed as % label (for the batch dose) and % initial. % Initial relates the misoprostol potency at whatever test point to the initial potency determined.
Misoprostol stability was tested over a period of 6 months. The misoprostol tested was the commercially available misoprostol in the form of an oil. Misoprostol was stored at a temperature of 25° C., and misoprostol content measured using HPLC at 0, 2, 4, 8 weeks and 3 and 6 months.
Results are shown below in Table 3:
A stability study was carried out on batches of dose 100 μg, 200 μg, and 400 μg of misoprostol. Desiccated and undesiccated packaged pessaries were stored at −20° C., 4° C., 25° C. and 40° C./75% relative humidity, to study the effect of these conditions on the formulation over a 12 month period.
The main focus of the study was misoprostol potency and levels of degradation products/impurities. BHA levels, release rate testing, loss on drying and % swelling testing were also carried out. Results are shown below for desiccated and undesiccated misoprostol containing hydrogels stored at 25° C.
2.1-25° C. Data for Undesiccated Batches
2.1.1 100 μg Misoprostol Dose Batch
Shown in Table 4 are the misoprostol potencies and the levels of degradation product/impurities found for the undesiccated 100 μg batch, over 12 months at 25° C. Results are also displayed in
Misoprostol potency for this batch falls over the 12 month duration of the study at 25° C. The potency value has dropped to 94.2% of the initial value. Levels of 8-iso misoprostol, over the study period at 25° C. reach a maximum of 1.0% label. Misoprostol A levels increase over the 12 month period, reaching a maximum of 2.5% label.
2.1.2 200 μg Dose Batch
Shown in Table 5 are the misoprostol potencies and the levels of degradation product/impurities found for the undesiccated 200 μg batch, over 12 months at 25° C.
Misoprostol potency has fallen for this batch over the 12 month duration of the study at 25° C. The potency value has dropped to 93.5% of the initial value. Levels of 8-iso misoprostol reached 1.1% label. Misoprostol A levels increase over the 12 month period, reaching a maximum of 1.5% label.
2.1.3 400 μg Dose Batch
Shown in Table 6 are the misoprostol potencies and the levels of degradation product/impurities found for the undesiccated 400 μg batch, over 12 months at 25° C.
Misoprostol potency has dropped for this batch over the 12-month duration of the study at 25° C. The potency value has dropped to 90.1% of the initial value. Levels of 8-iso misoprostol reached 1.3% label. Misoprostol A levels increase over the 12-month period, reaching a maximum of 2.6% label.
2.1.4 100 μg-400 μg Doses—Summary of Findings for Undesiccated Doses—Storage at 25° C.
Misoprostol potency in all three undesiccated doses falls over the 12-month duration of the study at 25° C. Potency values have dropped to between 90.1% and 94.2% of the initial values of the doses. 400 μg batch, shows the largest drop to 90.1% initial. Levels of 8-iso misoprostol do not show any marked change over the study period at 25° C. with maximums of 1.3% label found. Misoprostol A levels increase over the 12-month period, reaching maximum levels of 2.6% label in the 400 μg batch, at 25° C.
2.2-25° C. Data for Desiccated Batches
2.2.1 100 μg Dose Batch
Shown in Table 7 are the misoprostol potencies and the levels of degradation product/impurities found for the desiccated 100 μg batch, over 12 months at 25° C. Results are also displayed in
Generally for this dose misoprostol potencies fall within 97% to 100% initial over the 12 month duration of the study at 25° C. The exception is the 3-month time point. At this test point the misoprostol potency was found to be 86.7% of the initial value. This is out of character with the other test points at this temperature for this batch and of other batches tested at this test point for the same storage condition. For levels of 8-iso misoprostol, no change over the study period at 25° C. with maximums of 0.7% label found. Misoprostol A levels increase slightly over the 12-month period, reaching maximum levels of 1.9% label.
2.2.2 200 μg Dose Batch
Shown in Table 8 are the misoprostol potencies and the levels of degradation product/impurities found for the desiccated 200 μg batch, over 12 months at 25° C.
Misoprostol potency drops very slightly over the 12 month duration of the study at 25° C. for this dose, down to 96.6% initial. Levels of 8-iso misoprostol show no change over the study period at 25° C. with maximums of 1.1% label found. Misoprostol A levels increase slightly over the 12-month period, reaching maximum levels of 2.6% label.
2.2.3 400 μg Dose Batch
Shown in Table 9 are the misoprostol potencies and the levels of degradation product/impurities found for the desiccated 400 μg batch, over 12 months at 25° C.
Misoprostol potency drops very slightly over the 12-month duration of the study at 25° C. for this dose, down to 96.2% initial. Levels of 8-iso misoprostol show no change over the study period at 25° C. although a maximum of 1.6% label is found at 6 months. Misoprostol A levels increase slightly over the 12-month period, reaching maximum levels of 2.2% label
2.2.4 100 μg-400 μg Doses—Summary of Findings for Desiccated Doses—Storage at 25° C.
For all three desiccated doses, misoprostol potency drops very slightly over the 12-month duration of the study at 25° C. Generally potencies fall within 96% to 100% of the initial values. The exception being the 100 μg batch after 4 weeks, which has a potency of 86.7% of the initial value. This is out of character with the other test points at this temperature for this batch. Levels of 8-iso misoprostol showed no change over the study period at 25° C. although a maximum of 1.6% label is found. Misoprostol A levels increase slightly over the 12 month period, reaching maximum levels of 2.6% label in the 200 μg batch, at 25° C.
2.3 Summary of Results for Both Desiccated and Undesiccated Misoprostol-Containing Hydrogels
Misoprostol potency and levels of degradation products/impurities remain unchanged after 12 months/15 months storage at −20° C. for both desiccated and undesiccated doses.
Desiccation appears to improve the stability of the misoprostol over 12 months at 4° C. and particularly at 25° C. and 40° C. At 25° C., after 12 months, desiccated batches have misoprostol potencies greater than 95% of their initial values, whereas undesiccated batches of the same dose have potencies ranging from 90% to 94% of their initial value. At 40° C., after 12 months desiccated doses have misoprostol potencies of typically 90% of their initial values, whereas undesiccated doses range from 83% to 88% of their initial values. Correspondingly, at 40° C. levels of misoprostol A are greater in undesiccated batches than desiccated batches of the same dose.
Generally misoprostol A is the main degradation product. 8-iso misoprostol stability remained relatively unchanged (results not shown).
Levels of the polymer stabilising excipient, butylated hydroxy anisole (BHA) remain fairly constant in all desiccated and undesiccated batches at 25° C. over 12 months.
Generally it was found that the misoprostol release data did not change over 12 months at conditions tested for either desiccated or undesiccated batches of the three doses (results not shown).
Loss on drying data shows no change over 12 months at 25° C. for undesiccated batches (results not shown). There was a decrease in loss on drying values for desiccated batches at 25° C. (results not shown).
% Swelling values remained within specification (275-3250) for all the desiccated doses at 25° C. over the 12-month study period (results not shown).
Use of desiccation enhances the stability of the misoprostol formulation.
The following Table 10 shows the stability of dinoprostone (a PGE2 prostaglandin) both as a bulk drug crystal and contained within a polyurethane hydrogel matrix at 25° C. Measurements are taken at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months. The following results are for comparative purposes only and are not intended to form part of the present invention.
The above results are also depicted in
The stability of the dinoprostone contained in the hydrogel is decreased compared with the dinoprostone bulk drug itself.
Thus, in contrast to the misoprostol hydrogel formulation of the present invention, the formulation of dinoprostone in a hydrogel reduces its storage stability. Moreover, dinoprostone both with and without hydrogel shows marked degradation on storage.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0417401.7 | Aug 2004 | GB | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3487068 | Morozowich et al. | Dec 1969 | A |
| 3565991 | Short | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3598122 | Zaffaroni | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3598123 | Zaffaroni | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3639157 | Wunder et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3731683 | Zaffaroni | May 1973 | A |
| 3734097 | Zaffaroni | May 1973 | A |
| 3737521 | Born | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3760805 | Higuchi | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3797494 | Zaffaroni | Mar 1974 | A |
| 3830907 | Short | Aug 1974 | A |
| 3845761 | Zaffaroni | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3845770 | Theeuwes et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3854480 | Zaffaroni | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3860701 | Short | Jan 1975 | A |
| 3867933 | Kitrilakis | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3881043 | Rieser et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3892842 | Zaffaroni | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3896819 | Zaffaroni | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3901852 | Shah | Aug 1975 | A |
| 3916898 | Robinson | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3916899 | Theeuwes et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3921636 | Zaffaroni | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3931113 | Seeger et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
| 3934580 | Cournut | Jan 1976 | A |
| 3941880 | Short | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3948254 | Zaffaroni | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3948262 | Zaffaroni | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3967618 | Zaffaroni | Jul 1976 | A |
| 3993072 | Zaffaroni | Nov 1976 | A |
| 3993073 | Zaffaroni | Nov 1976 | A |
| 3995631 | Higuchi et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4018918 | Ayer et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4034756 | Higuchi et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4036227 | Zaffaroni et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4036360 | Deffeyes | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4041208 | Seeger et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4093708 | Zaffaroni et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4096238 | Zaffaroni et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4098747 | Bailey et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4135514 | Zaffaroni et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4142526 | Zaffaroni et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4202880 | Fildes et al. | May 1980 | A |
| 4205115 | Piccirilli et al. | May 1980 | A |
| 4215691 | Wong | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4235988 | Fildes et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4237885 | Wong | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4250611 | Wong | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4264757 | Park | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4276405 | Koleske et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4286587 | Wong | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4289757 | Glenn | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4327727 | Prahl et al. | May 1982 | A |
| 4379915 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4402695 | Wong | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4404296 | Schapel | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4426485 | Hoy et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4438225 | Peerman | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4447591 | Watanabe et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4466936 | Schapel | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4503216 | Fagerburg et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4568741 | Livingston | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4594240 | Kawata et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4596576 | de Nijs | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4647596 | Ishii et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4694238 | Norton | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4707495 | Rosenthale et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4731289 | Coleman | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4767787 | Kawata et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4804691 | English et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4814182 | Graham et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4818517 | Kwee et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4895934 | Matier et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4917686 | Bayston et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4931288 | Embrey et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4933418 | Sterrett | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4940588 | Sparks et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4945149 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4952402 | Sparks et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4954043 | Yoshida et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4973304 | Graham et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5000955 | Gould et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5002540 | Brodman et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5017382 | Embrey et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5023252 | Hseih | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5035891 | Runkel et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5045622 | Kohno et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5049638 | Matsumoto et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5055516 | Fisch et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5057573 | Pascault et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5061254 | Karakelle et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5079009 | Embrey et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5100926 | Kondo et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5110598 | Kwan et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5114718 | Damani | May 1992 | A |
| 5116932 | Fujiwa | May 1992 | A |
| 5118779 | Szycher | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5130126 | Koyama et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5156900 | Nishimura | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5159047 | Simms | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5176907 | Leong | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5178874 | Kwan et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5219663 | Kohno et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5219885 | Frolich et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5252602 | Alam et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5269321 | MacDonald et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5283297 | Miyachi et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5310759 | Bockman | May 1994 | A |
| 5312865 | Hoefer et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5322063 | Allen et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5324746 | McKee et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5326632 | Zenda et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5328954 | Sarangapani | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5354556 | Sparks et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5374704 | Muller et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5464868 | Frolich et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5470829 | Prisell et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5472785 | Stobbie et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5474767 | Tremont | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5505962 | Sparks | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5510384 | McKee et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5514698 | Ahmad et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5527534 | Myhling | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5574102 | Tanigami et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5578640 | Hanson | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5578643 | Hanson | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5605931 | Hanson | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5627254 | Oriani | May 1997 | A |
| 5634895 | Igo et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5650171 | Quigley et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5652274 | Martin | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5659003 | Menovcik et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5676939 | Tremont | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681278 | Igo et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681850 | Frolich et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5686425 | Lee | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5693319 | Tremont | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5700483 | Quigley et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5710215 | Abend | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5716676 | Schutze et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5723552 | Menovcik et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5726244 | McGee et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5726274 | Menovcik et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5731303 | Hsieh | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733538 | Riffle | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5739113 | Lee | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5744550 | Menovcik et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5747058 | Tipton et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5747582 | Schutze et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5760127 | Bammel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5763399 | Lee | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5770650 | McGee et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5777048 | Ohrbom et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5780049 | Deckner et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5792810 | Menovcik et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5795567 | Tremont | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5817343 | Burke | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5827925 | Tremont et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5827930 | Ohrbom et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5827931 | Menovcik et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5843961 | Kock et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5849803 | Kock et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5853767 | Melman | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5854385 | McGee et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5855906 | McClay | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5872195 | Green et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5877216 | Place et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5886039 | Kock et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888930 | Smith et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5891915 | Wysor et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5897879 | Friedman et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5900433 | Igo et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5935939 | Kararli et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5942512 | Kock et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5942545 | Samour et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5948416 | Wagner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5959775 | Joseph et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5965662 | Krebs et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5968542 | Tipton | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5972372 | Saleh et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5973002 | Frolich et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5977172 | Yoshikawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5985859 | Luo | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5994479 | Green et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5994492 | Graham et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6008312 | Shirasaka | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6013637 | Klein et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6022554 | Lee et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028057 | Burns | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6031002 | Wysor et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6039968 | Nabahi | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6040062 | McGee et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6043224 | Lee et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6046244 | Buyuktimkin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6080825 | Ohrbom et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6084038 | Ohrbom et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6086909 | Harrison et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6093270 | Ferencz et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6103256 | Nabahi | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6103765 | Neal | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6103852 | Shirasaka | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6114444 | Rehfuss et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6117024 | Dewanjee | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6117843 | Baroody et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6123963 | Kim et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6126958 | Saleh et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6130200 | Brodbeck et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6130309 | Reich et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140453 | Julia et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6150489 | Pudleiner et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6160058 | Ohrbom et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6184248 | Lee et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6187756 | Lee et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6188039 | Gass | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6197327 | Harrison et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6210343 | Kanakaris et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6210441 | Flodin | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221997 | Woodhouse et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6284836 | Hassel et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6294550 | Place et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6303147 | Gilis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6303606 | Leonardi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306841 | Place et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6323241 | Yeager et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6328991 | Myhling | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6335003 | Kim et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6346599 | Goldberg et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6403665 | Sieker et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6410595 | Neal | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6413536 | Gibson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6414027 | Neal | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6414028 | Büyüktimkin et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6416779 | D Augustine et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6420510 | Kaufhold et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6423788 | Bammel et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6440568 | Kayanoki et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6469016 | Place et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6469055 | Lee et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6471955 | Tremont et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6472434 | Place et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6482345 | Dewanjee | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6486207 | Yeager et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6488953 | Halliday et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6495157 | Pena et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6511388 | Dewanjee | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6512073 | Gertzmann et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6521164 | Plummer et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6537970 | Vulpescu et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6543828 | Gass | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6545119 | Kizumoto et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6559184 | Neal | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6572874 | Harrison et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6586553 | Mühlfeld et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6589990 | Kanakaris et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6592472 | Dewanjee | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6593313 | Place et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6593369 | Neal | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6607686 | Dewanjee | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6630050 | Moeller et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6632913 | Matsumoto et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6641064 | Dentler et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6642274 | Neal | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6664290 | El | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6693135 | Yeager et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6740333 | Beckett et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6790926 | Spijkers et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6794372 | Del Soldato et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6825234 | Yeager et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6841574 | Mo et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6953800 | Leonardi et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6992161 | Kim et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 7053209 | Gibson et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7179481 | Villanueva | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7485666 | Villanueva et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7670606 | Volkmann | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7717892 | Bartning | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7795467 | Pacetti et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7829112 | Ron et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7833543 | Gibson et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7833545 | Ron et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7838024 | Ron et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7883718 | Ron et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7892163 | Bartning et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 20010014715 | Blum et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010044467 | Neal | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010051656 | Place et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010051694 | Julia et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020004529 | Neal | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020013304 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020028846 | Yeager et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020037491 | Halliday et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020039935 | Dewanjee | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020045665 | Yeager et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052407 | Lee et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020062097 | Simpson | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077442 | Gertzmann et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077444 | Matsumoto et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099003 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020115814 | Woodhouse et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020115976 | Fleming | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020119833 | Dewanjee | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020128314 | Neal | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020132965 | Gertzmann et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161009 | Leonardi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030022022 | Kizumoto et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030032754 | Kaufhold et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030032759 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030045668 | Fischer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030060589 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030122282 | Plummer et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030129241 | Yeager et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030134903 | Yeager et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144454 | Krebs et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158369 | Slagel | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030207852 | Place et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212139 | Neal | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040014761 | Place et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044080 | Place et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040047910 | Beckett et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040110843 | Yeager et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040115229 | Roby | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040131664 | Mo et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040142847 | Bayersdoerfer et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040157766 | Embil et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040265355 | Shalaby | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040266688 | Nayak | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050004226 | Lu et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050013793 | Beckman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050031690 | Rohrs et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050048104 | Venkatraman et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050053639 | Shalaby | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050053670 | Schaub | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050070516 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090474 | Naor | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050095245 | Riley et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050161030 | Robert et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050169975 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050187342 | Schieferstein et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050208152 | Milankovits | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050238722 | Pathak et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245902 | Cornish et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060003950 | Strugnell et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060018951 | Maniar et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060041021 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060052341 | Cornish et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078616 | Georgewill et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060093675 | Ebmeier et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060134161 | Halliday | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060183724 | Diliberti et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060210599 | Gibson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070043332 | Malcolm et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070128154 | Hadba et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070135605 | Hadba et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070148105 | Spector | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070155906 | Hissink et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070166382 | Kiser et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282093 | Yoshimura et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080009663 | Bartning et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080009666 | Bartning et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080108775 | Schieferstein et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080140185 | Kiser et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080145419 | Gibson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080152708 | Gibson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080199511 | Sitruk-Ware et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080206310 | Davis | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080207571 | Davis | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080262613 | Gogolewski | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080271190 | Holland | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080286339 | Ron et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090004246 | Woolfson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090011209 | Steinberger et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090060982 | Ron et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090061172 | Hayashi et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090081278 | De Graaff et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090203591 | Bagchi et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090203772 | Villanueva et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090291120 | Tuominen et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100104619 | De Graaff et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100203104 | De Graaff et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100285094 | Gupta | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110045076 | Kiser et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110056501 | Kortesuo et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110059040 | Kiser et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110077578 | Bartning et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110091488 | Halliday et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110150955 | Klingman | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 19842636 | Mar 1999 | DE |
| 19742217 | Apr 1999 | DE |
| 335669 | Jan 1990 | EP |
| 424164 | Apr 1991 | EP |
| 450176 | Oct 1991 | EP |
| 401990 | Jan 1992 | EP |
| 1063942 | Jul 2002 | EP |
| 2557576 | Jun 1988 | FR |
| 2705567 | Dec 1994 | FR |
| 2047094 | Nov 1980 | GB |
| 2047093 | Dec 1983 | GB |
| 2244920 | Dec 1991 | GB |
| 5600253 | Mar 1980 | JP |
| 1135488 | Feb 1983 | JP |
| 0670952 | Mar 1994 | JP |
| 1150610 | Jun 1999 | JP |
| 200502691 | Mar 2000 | JP |
| 2001513550 | Sep 2001 | JP |
| 2002515069 | May 2002 | JP |
| 2011507405 | Mar 2011 | JP |
| WO 8001984 | Oct 1980 | WO |
| WO8905319 | Jun 1989 | WO |
| WO8907117 | Aug 1989 | WO |
| WO9102763 | Mar 1991 | WO |
| WO9403510 | Feb 1994 | WO |
| WO9413724 | Jun 1994 | WO |
| WO9422934 | Oct 1994 | WO |
| WO9606875 | Mar 1996 | WO |
| WO 9638153 | May 1996 | WO |
| WO9615171 | May 1996 | WO |
| WO9621427 | Jul 1996 | WO |
| WO9631551 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO9717386 | May 1997 | WO |
| WO 9724109 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO9724109 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO 9856323 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO 9909964 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO9947073 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO9947127 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO9956731 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| WO0000222 | Jan 2000 | WO |
| WO0040222 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO 0203896 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO 0209631 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO03011301 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO03087183 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO2004029125 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO2004084872 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005063145 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO2005068533 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO2005089778 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO2005116100 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO2006013335 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO2006048639 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO2008007098 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO2009094573 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010035837 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010119029 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011011099 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011039418 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Sato et el, The effects of a prostaglandin E1 analogue, misoprostol, on gastric mucosal blood volume index and haemoglobin oxygenation in humans, Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2008, 2(6), 499-505. |
| Abraham, et al., “Bioresorbable poly(ester-ether urethane)s from L-Iysine diisocyanate and triblock copolymers with different hydrophilic character.” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A (2006) 76(4): 729-736. |
| Australian Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2010, which issued in corresponding Australian Application No. 2005268645. |
| Australian Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2010, which issued in corresponding Australian Application No. 2005268645. |
| Baimak et al., “Synthesis and characterization of poly(I-lactide-co-e-caprolactone) copolymers: Effect of stannous octoate initiator and diethylel glycol coinitiator concentration.” ScienceAsia 30 (2004):324-334. |
| Canadian Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2011, which issued in corresponding Canadian Application No. 2575933. |
| Casteneda, C.S., et al. “Misoprostol Dose Selection in a Controlled-Release Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 193:1071-1075, (Sep. 2005). |
| Chen, “Stabilization and sustained-release effect of Misoprostol with Methacrylate copolymer”, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 203 (2000) pp. 141-148. |
| Chinese Office Action mailed Oct. 12, 2010, which issued in corresponding Chinese Application No. 2005800261903. |
| Chinese Office Action mailed Nov. 13, 2009, which issued in corresponding Chinese Application No. 2005800261903. |
| Chinese Office Action mailed Apr. 23, 2010, which issued in corresponding Chinese Application No. 2005800261903. |
| Chinese Office Action mailed May 20, 2010, which issued in corresponding Chinese Application No. 2005800261903. |
| European Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2010, which issued in corresponding European Application No. 05763115.2. |
| European Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2011, which issued in corresponding European Application No. 05763115.2. |
| Indian Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2012, which issued in corresponding Indian Application No. 697/DELNP/2007. |
| Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 16, 2011, which issued in corresponding Japanese Application No. JP2007524389. |
| Japanese Office Action mailed Jan. 27, 2012, which issued in corresponding Japanese Application No. JP2007524389. |
| Jianzhong et al. “Polycaprolactone-poly(ethylene glycol) block copolymer III Drug release behavior.” Chinese J Polym Sci., 13(2) 1995:154:161. |
| Kararli, “Stabilization of Misoprostol with Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HMPC) Against Degradation by Water”, Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 7, No. 11 (1990). |
| Lee JW, et al., “Thermoreversible gelation of biodegradable poly(epsilon-caprolactone) and poly(ethylene glycol)multiblock copolymers in aqueous solutions.” J Control Release. Jun. 15, 2001; 73(2-3):315-27. |
| Leiva et al., “Poly(£-caprolactone)-block-poly(ethyleneoxide) -block-poly(£-V caprolactone): Biodegradable triblock copolymer spread at the air-water interface.” European Polymer Journal 44(8), Aug. 2008:2589-2598. |
| Merck Index (Ninth Edition, 1976, p. 4073). |
| Mexican Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2011, which issued in corresponding Mexican Application No. MX/a/2007/00115. |
| New Zealand Examination Report mailed May 1, 2009, which issued in corresponding New Zealand Application No. 552756. |
| PCT/GB2003/004208 International Search Report dated Jan. 2, 2004. |
| PCT/GB2005/002951 Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Oct. 6, 2005. |
| PCT/GB2005/002951 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 6, 2007. |
| PCT/GB207/002604, International Search Report, dated Jul. 12, 2007. |
| PCTGB207 002604 Written Opinion of International Searching Authority Jul. 12, 2007. |
| PCT/GB2005/002951 International Search Report dated Oct. 20, 2005. |
| PCT/GB2007/002401 International Search Report dated Oct. 24, 2007. |
| PCT/GB2007/002401 Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Oct. 24, 2007. |
| PCT/GB2007/002415 International Search Report dated Oct. 30, 2007. |
| PCT/GB2007/002415 Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Oct. 30, 2007. |
| Santerre, et al., “Understanding the biodegradation of polyurethanes: From classical implants to tissue engineering materials.” Biomaterials 26(35), Dec. 2005: 7457-7470. |
| Tyagi, P., et al., “Sustained Intravesical Drug Delivery Using Thermosensitive Hydrogel,” Pharmaceutical Research, 21 (5):832-837 (May 2004). |
| Yu, J., et al. “Blood interactions with novel polyurethaneurea hydrogels,” Biomaterials 12(2): 119-120 (1991). |
| Zhou et al., “Biodegradable poly(e-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene glycol) block copolymers: characterization and their use as drug carriers for a controlled delivery system.” Biomaterials (2003) 24(20): 3563-3570. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120184615 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11573256 | US | |
| Child | 13429678 | US |