Stabilised prostaglandin composition

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8460707
  • Patent Number
    8,460,707
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 26, 2012
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 11, 2013
    12 years ago
Abstract
A pharmaceutical delivery device, such as a suppository or pessary, comprises a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue (e.g. misoprostol) in a solid polyurethane hydrogel. The polyurethane is either linear or cross-linked.
Description
FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention provides a pharmaceutical delivery device comprising a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue, such as misoprostol or analogues or derivatives thereof and a polyurethane hydrogel; and also uses and methods of preparation of such a device.


BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

Prostaglandins are a group of lipids, which are modified fatty acids attached to a 5-membered ring and with biological/pharmaceutical activities suitable for a variety of therapeutic uses. Such uses include reproductive health disorders and disorders linked to inflammatory response. However, prostaglandins are often unstable under ambient conditions and have sometimes proved difficult to store and produce in a form suitable for pharmaceutical/therapeutic use.


A prostaglandin formulation, which allows controlled release of the active compound for therapeutic use is described in patent specifications GB 2047093 and GB 2047094. Such formulations use hydrogels, which are known sustained release delivery vehicles; and in particular, “solid” cross-linked polyurethane materials having the ability to swell and absorb several times their own weight of water whilst retaining their physical integrity. The formulations have been provided as pessaries to deliver dinoprostone (a PGE2 prostaglandin) to the cervix to ripen it prior to the induction of labour, and is available under the trademarks Propess® and Cervidil®. The pessary is enclosed in a net pouch and usually remains in place in the cervix for up to 24 hours. However, this prostaglandin, even when loaded into such hydrogels, is somewhat unstable at room temperature and therefore the pessary is generally stored at temperatures of around −20° C.


Various attempts have been made to provide stabilised formulations of prostaglandins in general. PGE2 prostaglandins tend to be more unstable than PGE1 prostaglandins.


Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin analogue; in particular, a cytoprotective prostaglandin PGE1 analogue. Misoprostol is a compound represented by the following stereoisomeric formulae:




embedded image


Misoprostol in its physical state is an oil, which is difficult to formulate and unstable at room temperature. Misoprostol possesses mucosal protective properties and is an inhibitor of gastric acid secretion. Misoprostol has been used previously in the treatment and prevention of gastric ulcers, in particular NSAID-induced ulcers.


Misoprostol may be obtained commercially or prepared by known reaction schemes, such as by the methods taught in U.S. Pat. No. 3,965,143, for example.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,301,146 describes a solid state dispersion of misoprostol and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) or hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC). These formulations may be in the form of a tablet or capsule.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,935,939 describes a stabilised solid state dispersion of misoprotol and in particular, the preparation of stabilised misoprostol using amorphous or semi-crystalline excipients.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,642,274 discloses use of a large number of prostaglandins, including misoprostol. However, there is no focus on the problems of formulating misoprostol. Hydrogels are mentioned but these are semi-liquid compositions or low melting compositions suitable for suppositories.


US Patent Publication 2003/0050620 discloses prostaglandins in general but not PGE1 analogues. Hydrogels are mentioned but the problems of formulating PGE1 analogues are not addressed.


Other patent publications dealing with prostaglandins and/or hydrogel carriers include U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,588, U.S. Pat. No. 6,589,549, US 2002/0076441, U.S. Pat. No. 6,685,962, US 2003/0021845, US 2003/0049320 and US 2003/0064088.


It is an object of the present invention to provide a PGE1 formulation showing increased stability properties compared with unformulated misoprostol; and in particular to provide a solid state misoprostol formulation which has increased storage stability at room temperature.


SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The present invention is based on the unexpected observation that the stability of a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue, misoprostol, at room temperature is increased when formulated in a polyurethane hydrogel. This increased stability is surprising and is not exhibited by other prostaglandins, such as dinoprostone, when formulated in this way.


In a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a pharmaceutical delivery device comprising a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue or derivative thereof in a polyurethane hydrogel.


The pharmaceutical delivery device allows the effective sustained delivery of the pharmaceutical, a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue, such as misoprostol, from the solid state hydrogel. Typically, the pharmaceutical is intended to be delivered to a patient (human or animal).


Generally, the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue is dispersed throughout the polyurethane hydrogel matrix.


The polyurethane hydrogel of the pharmaceutical delivery device of the present invention extends to polyurethane hydrogels well known to the man skilled in the art. Without wishing to be bound by theory, said polyurethane hydrogels when hydrated form a gel but do not dissolve. They are solid in the sense that, whilst being swellable, they retain their physical integrity without becoming a liquid or semi-liquid gel. The polyurethane hydrogels are capable of being loaded with the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue, such as misoprostol. The polyurethane hydrogels may be cross-linked or linear polymers. Furthermore, the polyurethane hydrogels may be swollen in a “wet state” or unswollen in a “dry” or “desiccated” state in the device of the invention. These states will be described further below.


The polyurethane hydrogel used in the delivery device of the present invention may be of the type disclosed in GB 2047093 and GB 2047094. These patent specifications disclose cross-linked polyurethane hydrogels.


Alternatively, the delivery device of the present invention may include a polyurethane hydrogel, as described in patent specification WO 2004/029125. This patent specification discloses linear polyurethane hydrogels. Such linear polyurethane hydrogels may be obtained by reacting a polyethylene glycol and a diol or other difunctional compound with a difunctional isocyanate.


Without wishing to be bound by theory and unless otherwise stated herein, it should be understood that the properties and variables of the hydrogels as described in GB 2047093, GB 2047094 and WO 2004/029125 are applicable to the present invention.


Typically, the cross-linked polyurethane hydrogel (as described in GB 2047093 and GB 2047094) is prepared from a long chain polyethylene glycol (e.g. PEG 2000, 4000, 6000 and 8000, which has been extensively dried), a triol (for example, hexanetriol) as cross-linking agent and a diisocyanate (such as dicyclohexyl methane diisocyanate). The mixture is cured at elevated temperatures in a mould.


Typically, the linear polyurethane hydrogel is prepared from a) a polyethylene oxide, b) a difunctional compound and c) a difunctional isocyanate (as described polyurethane hydrogel is swellable in water and suitable as a carrier for the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue in the delivery device of the present invention. Furthermore, the linear polyurethane hydrogel of the delivery device of the present invention may be loaded with poorly water-soluble pharmaceutical agents, such as a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue, including misoprostol, for example when such agents are dissolved in a common solvent with the polymer. An example of a solvent is ethanol. The resultant solution may then be cast into any desired solid forms.


The polyurethane hydrogels for use in the present invention provide water-swellable polyurethane polymers having swellabilities, for example up to 500%, up to 800% or even about 1,000%. Percent (%) swelling, is understood to mean the increase in weight of the swollen polymer divided by the weight of the dry polymer. Usually, the polymer is swellable in the range 200% to 2000%, for example 250 to 1700%. The linear polyurethane hydrogels are also soluble in certain organic solvents, such as dichloromethane, which allows the hydrogel to be dissolved and cast into films or coatings. Therefore, as mentioned above, it also allows active agents of poor water solubility but which are soluble in organic solvents, such as misoprostol, to be loaded into the polymer.


Polyethylene oxides contain the repeat unit (CH2CH2O) and are conveniently prepared by the stepwise addition of ethylene oxide to a compound containing a reactive hydrogen atom. Polyethylene glycols are prepared by the addition of ethylene oxide to ethylene glycol to produce a difunctional polyethylene glycol structure HO(CH2CH2O)nH wherein n is an integer of varying size depending on the molecular weight of polyethylene oxide. For example, polyethylene oxides used in the linear polyurethane hydrogels of the present invention are generally linear polyethylene glycols i.e. diols having a equivalent weight of 1500 to 20,000, particularly 3000 to 10,000 and especially 4000 to 8000. Molecular weights are usually in the region 4000 to 35,000.


In this description the term “equivalent weight” is used as meaning the number average molecular weight divided by the functionality of the compound.


The difunctional compound is reactive with the difunctional isocyanate, and is typically a difunctional amine or diol. Diols in the range C5 to C20, preferably C8 to C15 are preferred. Thus, decane diol has been found to produce particularly good results. The diol may be a saturated or unsaturated diol. Branched diols may be used but straight chain diols are preferred. The two hydroxy groups are generally on terminal carbon atoms. Thus, preferred diols include 1,6-hexanediol, 1,10-decanediol, 1,12-dodecanediol and 1,16-hexadecanediol.


The difunctional isocyanate is generally one of the conventional diisocyanates, such as dicyclohexylmethane-4,4-diisocyanate, diphenylmethane-4,4-diisocyanate, 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate etc.


The ratio of the components (a) to (b) to (c) of the linear polymer described above (in terms of equivalent weights) is generally in the range 0.1-1.5 to 1 to 1.1-2.5, particularly 0.2-0.9 to 1 to 1.2-1.9. A preferred range is 0.5-0.9 to 1 to 1.5-1.9. Of course, the skilled man through reasonable experimentation would determine the best ratio of ingredients to give the desired properties. The amount of component (c) is generally equal to the combined amounts of (a) and (b) to provide the correct stoichiometry.


Linear polyurethane hydrogels produced at extreme ends of the ranges may not necessarily give optimal properties. For example, high amounts of (a) polyethylene oxide may undesirably lead to the polymer being water-soluble. Small amounts may reduce the percentage swelling. Generally, the ratio of (a) polyethylene oxide to (b) difunctional compound is preferable 0.1-1.5 to one, preferably 0.2-0.9 to one.


The linear polyurethane hydrogels are generally produced by melting the previously dried polyethylene glycol together with the difunctional compound (e.g. diol) at a temperature of around 85° C. A catalyst such as ferric chloride is incorporated. The molten mixture is dried under vacuum to remove excess moisture and the diisocyanate added thereto. The reaction mixture is then poured into billet moulds and cured for a specified time. Thus, the linear polyurethane hydrogel is initially formed as a moulded solid. However, the linear polyurethane hydrogels of the delivery device of the present invention are soluble in certain organic solvents. This allows the polymer to be dissolved and the resultant solution cast to form films. The solution may also be employed for coating granules, tablets etc., in order to modify their release properties. Alternatively, the solution can be poured into a non-solvent so as to precipitate polymer/active microparticles.


Generally, the polyurethane hydrogel is washed in water, followed by washing in an ethanol:water mixture before being loaded with a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue by soaking the hydrogel in an aqueous solution of a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue of required concentration for a time sufficient for uptake of the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue to occur, followed by drying the hydrogel down to the required water content. Typically, the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue is dissolved in organic solvent, such as an ethanol:water solvent, before being loaded into the polyurethane hydrogel.


The term “synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue” as used herein is understood to cover the compound generally known as misoprostol and any analogues or derivatives thereof. Analogues or derivatives thereof are intended to encompass structural analogues or derivatives of the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue which maintain the essential pharmaceutical activity of the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue, including misoprostol; for example, prostaglandins of different chain length, or different salts or esters which maintain pharmacological activity. These may also encompass stereoisomers of the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue, such as misoprostol. It will be understood that the term synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue (or misoprostol) is not intended to encompass naturally occurring PGE1. Synthetic PGE1 analogues or derivatives may be in the form of an ester; such as a methyl ester: whereas said naturally occurring PGE1 is normally in the acid form. One or more C1-6 alkyl groups (particularly methyl) may be attached to the prostanoic acid carbon chain, especially at the 15-position. Typically, misoprostol PGE1 analogue or derivative in its physical state is an oil, whereas naturally occurring PGE1 is in a crystalline form.


Misoprostol should be understood to mean (11α,13E)-(±)-11,16-Dihydroxy-16-methyl-9-oxoprost-13-en-1-oic acid methyl ester or analogue(s) or derivative(s) thereof, as described herein. Preferably, misoprostol has the formula C22H33O5 or the general structure as hereinbefore described.


Typically, misoprostol has a molecular weight of around 380.


The delivery device of the present invention may be in the form of a suppository, a pessary for vaginal use, a buccal insert for oral administration, an implant etc. Preferably, the device is in the form of a comfortable unit, which is flexible enough (particularly when swollen) to be accommodated within a body cavity: for example, buccal cavity in intimate contact with the mucosal membrane. Preferred shapes include sheets, discs, ovals, kidney shapes, strips and cylinders. Generally, the smallest dimension is in the range 5-15 mm and the longest dimension in the range 10-25 mm. Preferred thicknesses are in the range 0.5-5 mm, especially 0.5-2.5 mm, particularly 1-2.5 mm and more particularly 0.8-1.5 mm. It will be understood, however, that length and thickness of said delivery device may be altered and designed to preferred sizes per individual patient.


The delivery device of the present invention has a number of applications including the treatment of schizophrenia, prevention of gastric ulcers, mucositis and orthodontic applications. Typically, the device is used for its action upon the female reproductive system of both human and non-human animals. Preferably, the device of the present invention is used in the induction of labour. The device may also be used for first and second trimester abortion and the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH).


The pharmaceutical delivery device of the present invention is intended to administer a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue to a patient, remaining in place until partial or complete delivery of the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue has occurred. The spent delivery device may then be removed from the patient. Advantageously, the delivery device may further comprise means for removal of the device from a patient. For example, using means well known to the person skilled in the art, such as removal means used for conventional tampons for vaginal use.


An objective of the present invention is the stabilisation of a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue in the delivery device of the present invention, especially at temperature above +4° C., particularly at room temperature of around +20° C. The synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue-containing delivery device of the present invention allows the controlled release of a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue into a patient. At low water contents, the delivery device may adhere to the mucosal membrane of a patient. The synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue may be absorbed systemically or may exert a local action on adjacent tissue structures. Typical autoadhesive properties for improved means of delivery of said synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue to a patient are described in WO 00/32171.


Typically, stabilisation of synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue is understood to mean the increased stability or, conversely, the decreased degradation of this prostaglandin at temperatures above 4° C. within the delivery device of the present invention. For example, wherein the percent dose of the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue present within the delivery device of the present invention after storage at temperatures above 4° C. (preferably room temperature of around 20° C.) is within a range of 90-100% of initial dose of the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue added to the delivery device of the present invention. The stability also depends on the water content of the hydrogel.


If necessary, penetration enhancers, as known in the art, may be employed to assist the rate of transmucosal delivery, depending on the nature of the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue, for example, its lipophilic or hydrophilic characteristics, size and molecular weight. Generally, the more lipophilic the compound, the better the absorption. The nonionised form of a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue appears to be best for absorption. In view of the rapid and effective delivery through mucosal tissues, penetration enhancers may not be required. Such penetration enhancers are known from topical application to skin tissue, which constitutes a more significant barrier to absorption. Weak acids and some detergents have been used as penetration enhancers.


The release properties of the polyurethane hydrogel of the delivery device of the present invention may be modified by applying a coating thereto. The synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue may be included in a coating as well as in the hydrogel matrix in order to provide a desired delivery profile.


The polyurethane hydrogel of the delivery device of the present invention in use may be in a swollen or “wet” state or unswollen in a “dry” or “desiccated” state as hereinbefore described. For example, in swollen state water content may be 30-40% by weight. Preferably, 25% by weight or less. More preferably, 5-10% by weight. Alternatively, in unswollen or dry state the polyurethane hydrogel usually contains little or no water. For example, about 1-2 wt %. Preferably, the water content of the hydrogel is about or less than 1%. More preferably, the water content is around 0.5% to around 0.8%. Even more preferably the water content of the polyurethane hydrogel is about or less than 0.1%.


Advantageously, the delivery device of the present invention in its “dry” state lends to easier storage before use, including at temperatures above 4° C., such as room temperature of 20° C., without loss of or reduced synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue activity. Indeed, as hereinbefore described, the synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue displays increased stability when formulated in the polyurethane hydrogel delivery devices of the present invention. Typically, said dry state may contain a water content of around 0.5% to around 0.8% and be stored with a desiccant to further reduce the water content of the delivery device.


Typically, the water content of the hydrogel is less than or about 0.1% when said hydrogel is desiccated or in “dry” state. Generally, the desiccated hydrogel may absorb water from the surroundings after administration.


Typically, the delivery device of the present invention comprises: synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue in a dose of about 25 to 400 micrograms (μg); has a thickness of around 0.4 to 1.5 mm; and has a weight of around 120 to 500 milligrams (mg). Typically, a dose of synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue of around 100 μg is contained within a polyurethane hydrogel of around 241 mg weight and of around 0.8 mm thickness.


In a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of preparing the pharmaceutical delivery device of the present invention, comprising the steps of:


a) contacting a polyurethane hydrogel with an aqueous solution of synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue such as to swell the hydrogel;


b) removing the swollen hydrogel from the solution; and


c) drying the hydrogel to a desired water content.


In a yet further aspect of the present invention there is provided use of the pharmaceutical delivery device of the present invention for controlled administration of a synthetic prostaglandin PGE1 analogue to a human or animal.


Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of figures and examples as follows:





FIGURES

FIG. 1—shows a graph displaying the results of enhanced stability of polyurethane hydrogel containing 100 μg misoprostol (desiccated and undesiccated batches) at 25° C. The results are compared against the stability of Misoprostol Oil standard (in the absence of polyurethane hydrogel) which degrades with time at 25° C.



FIG. 2 (Comparison)—shows a graph of the stability of bulk drug crystal of dinoprostone (a PGE2 prostaglandin), and dinoprostone loaded into polyurethane hydrogel at 25° C. The dinoprostone is less stable when contained in the hydrogel; and both the hydrogel and non-hydrogel samples show considerable degradation over time.





METHODS

The methods and results presented herein refer generally to pessaries, which are polyurethane hydrogels (as described previously in GB 2047093 and GB 2047094, and WO 2004/029125) loaded with varying amounts of misoprostol, as described.


1.1 Loading Protocol for Misoprostol Inserts


Purification


0.8 mm Polymer slices are purified by submerging in an excess of water for a first and second wash for a number of hours. The water is decanted after each wash and then the units are finally washed in an ethanol (25%):water mixture for a further few hours. This solution is again discarded.


Loading


The correct amount of misoprostol is weighed to achieve the desired final potency and dissolved in ethanol (25%): water along with the Butylated Hydroxy Anisole (BHA) used to stabilise the polymer. Sufficient of this solution is made to submerge the previously washed units and the units left to rotate in a closed vessel for a period at 4° C. The excess loading solution is decanted off and the units shaken dry.


Drying


Loaded inserts are placed in a tablet coating pan and rotated at ambient temperature and air and finally dehumidified air. Units may then be inserted into a retrieval tape and packaged appropriately. The solvent remaining in the units (water) is typically less than 1% at this stage (about 0.5-0.8%). The addition of a desiccated label inside the packaging reduces this down to 0.1-0.2%.


1.2 Measuring Misoprostol Potency Degradation Product/Impurity and BHA Content


The desiccated batches were packaged in preformed foil sachets containing desiccant labels.


Samples were taken at random from the batch. A minimum of 20 inserts were used for full testing.


100-400 μg Doses


10 Pessaries


HPLC Apparatus (ultraviolet absorbance detector at 280 nm with 6 mm pathlength)


Waring Blender with Stainless Steel Mini-Cup (110 ml) and Cap


Mobile Phase


Post Column Derivatising Agent


Mechanical Flask Shaker


BHA Misoprostol Standard Solution Preparation


The series of concentrations required for misoprostol standard preparation is described below. However, prior to the dilution to the mark of the misoprostol standard, pipette a volume of BHA stock solutions ca 40 μg/ml and 70 μg/ml prepared in mobile phase that would represent 10% of the total volume of the flask, i.e., 20 ml in 200 ml and 50 ml in 500 ml for respective extraction volume scenarios.


Misoprostol Standard Solution Preparation


A level one standard of approximately 8 mg and a level two standard of approximately 12 mg of misoprostol reference standard was accurately weighed and added each to separate 100 ml volumetric flask containing approximately 50 ml of 70% methanol mobile phase. Flasks were placed in an ultrasonic bath for 5 minutes and agitated on a flat bed shaker for no less than one hour. Standard flasks were diluted to volume with 70% methanol mobile phase. Depending on the target potency of the particular batch, the two standard solutions were diluted with 70% mobile phase using the guidelines outlined in table 1 below.









TABLE 1







Standard Dilution Guidelines for Misoprostol Analysis










Batch Target Potency
Standard Dilution



(μg/unit)
Potency Determination







100
1 in 20



200
1 in 10



300
1 in 15



400
1 in 10











Sample Preparation—for 100-400 μg Doses


10 pessary units were swollen in 40 ml of mobile phase. The units were then transferred to a Waring blender, mascerated and quantitatively transferred to the appropriate volumetric flask through washing with mobile phase. The beaker used to swell the units was washed with mobile phase into the volumetric flask (see table 2). The flask and its contents were then shaken on a flat bed shaker for 2 hours, after 1 hour the neck of the flask was washed down with mobile phase. The flask was then diluted to the mark with mobile phase and contents allowed to settle and equilibriate for 20 minutes prior to sampling into HPLC vials.









TABLE 2







Extracting Volumes for Misoprostol Analysis










Batch Target Potency
Extraction



(μg/unit)
Volume (ml)







100
200



200
200



300
500



400
500










Misoprostol potency, together with the related impurities 8-iso misoprostol, dehydroxy misoprostol type A and unidentified impurity peaks were quantified with reference to the area response factor from the prepared misoprostol standard solutions using the following expression.


Note Standard Concentrations for Calibration are Expressed in Terms of μg Misoprostol Per ml







Misoprostol






/


Impurity





Content

=



Area





Sample





Peak


Mean





Misoprostal





Standard





RF


×


Sample





Volume



No
.




of






Samples










B





H





A





Content

=



Area





Sample





Peak


Mean





Standard





B





H





A





R





F


×


Sample





Volume



No
.




of






Samples







Misoprostol potencies and degradation product contents are expressed as % label (for the batch dose) and % initial. % Initial relates the misoprostol potency at whatever test point to the initial potency determined.


EXAMPLES
Example 1
Stability Study of Misoprostol Oil at 25° C.

Misoprostol stability was tested over a period of 6 months. The misoprostol tested was the commercially available misoprostol in the form of an oil. Misoprostol was stored at a temperature of 25° C., and misoprostol content measured using HPLC at 0, 2, 4, 8 weeks and 3 and 6 months.


Results are shown below in Table 3:
















TABLE 3





Attribute
Specification
0
2 w
4 w
8 w
3 m
6 m







Physical
Clear
Colourless
Colourless
Colourless
Clear
Straw
Yellow


form
colourless to
oil
oil
oil
colourless
yellow
oil



yellow oil



oil
oil



Misoprostol
97.0-102.0%
101.59
99.61
98.59
96.87
93.63
57.07


content
w/w









Example 2
Stability Study of Desiccated and Undesiccated Polyurethane Polymers Loaded with Misoprostol (Misoprostol Batches of Dose 100 μg, 200 μg, and 400 μg)

A stability study was carried out on batches of dose 100 μg, 200 μg, and 400 μg of misoprostol. Desiccated and undesiccated packaged pessaries were stored at −20° C., 4° C., 25° C. and 40° C./75% relative humidity, to study the effect of these conditions on the formulation over a 12 month period.


The main focus of the study was misoprostol potency and levels of degradation products/impurities. BHA levels, release rate testing, loss on drying and % swelling testing were also carried out. Results are shown below for desiccated and undesiccated misoprostol containing hydrogels stored at 25° C.


2.1-25° C. Data for Undesiccated Batches


2.1.1 100 μg Misoprostol Dose Batch


Shown in Table 4 are the misoprostol potencies and the levels of degradation product/impurities found for the undesiccated 100 μg batch, over 12 months at 25° C. Results are also displayed in FIG. 1.









TABLE 4







Misoprostol potency degradation product/impurities


levels of undesiccated 100 μg batch,


over 12 months at 25° C.












8-iso



Time
Misoprostol
misoprostol
Misoprostol A












Point
μg/unit
% Label
% Initial
% Label
% Label















Initial
103.9
103.9
100.0
0.7
0.1


 4 weeks
102.1
102.1
98.3
0.9
0.3


 4 months
98.8
98.8
95.1
1.0
0.5


 7 months
94.0
94.0
90.5
0.8
1.4


12 months
97.9
97.9
94.2
1.0
2.5









Misoprostol potency for this batch falls over the 12 month duration of the study at 25° C. The potency value has dropped to 94.2% of the initial value. Levels of 8-iso misoprostol, over the study period at 25° C. reach a maximum of 1.0% label. Misoprostol A levels increase over the 12 month period, reaching a maximum of 2.5% label.


2.1.2 200 μg Dose Batch


Shown in Table 5 are the misoprostol potencies and the levels of degradation product/impurities found for the undesiccated 200 μg batch, over 12 months at 25° C.









TABLE 5







Misoprostol potency degradation product/impurities


levels of undesiccated 200 μg batch,


over 12 months at 25° C.












8-iso



Time
Misoprostol
misoprostol
Misoprostol A












Point
μg/unit
% Label
% Initial
% Label
% Label















Initial
206.3
103.1
100.0
0.5
ND


 4 months
202.3
101.2
98.1
0.9
0.8


12 months
192.8
96.4
93.5
1.1
1.5





ND—none detected






Misoprostol potency has fallen for this batch over the 12 month duration of the study at 25° C. The potency value has dropped to 93.5% of the initial value. Levels of 8-iso misoprostol reached 1.1% label. Misoprostol A levels increase over the 12 month period, reaching a maximum of 1.5% label.


2.1.3 400 μg Dose Batch


Shown in Table 6 are the misoprostol potencies and the levels of degradation product/impurities found for the undesiccated 400 μg batch, over 12 months at 25° C.









TABLE 6







Misoprostol potency degradation product/impurities


levels of undesiccated 400 μg batch,


over 12 months at 25° C.












8-iso



Time
Misoprostol
misoprostol
Misoprostol A












Point
μg/unit
% Label
% Initial
% Label
% Label















Initial
424.3
106.1
100.0
1.0
0.5


 4 weeks
416.6
104.2
98.2
1.0
0.8


 4 months
404.7
101.2
95.4
1.1
1.2


 7 months
389.2
97.3
91.7
1.0
1.8


12 months
382.1
95.5
90.1
1.3
2.6









Misoprostol potency has dropped for this batch over the 12-month duration of the study at 25° C. The potency value has dropped to 90.1% of the initial value. Levels of 8-iso misoprostol reached 1.3% label. Misoprostol A levels increase over the 12-month period, reaching a maximum of 2.6% label.


2.1.4 100 μg-400 μg Doses—Summary of Findings for Undesiccated Doses—Storage at 25° C.


Misoprostol potency in all three undesiccated doses falls over the 12-month duration of the study at 25° C. Potency values have dropped to between 90.1% and 94.2% of the initial values of the doses. 400 μg batch, shows the largest drop to 90.1% initial. Levels of 8-iso misoprostol do not show any marked change over the study period at 25° C. with maximums of 1.3% label found. Misoprostol A levels increase over the 12-month period, reaching maximum levels of 2.6% label in the 400 μg batch, at 25° C.


2.2-25° C. Data for Desiccated Batches


2.2.1 100 μg Dose Batch


Shown in Table 7 are the misoprostol potencies and the levels of degradation product/impurities found for the desiccated 100 μg batch, over 12 months at 25° C. Results are also displayed in FIG. 1.









TABLE 7







Misoprostol potency degradation product/impurities levels of


desiccated 100 μg batch, over 12 months at 25° C.












8-iso



Time
Misoprostol
misoprostol
Misoprostol A












Point
μg/unit
% Label
% Initial
% Label
% Label















Initial
103.9
103.9
100.0
0.7
0.1


 4 weeks
90.1
90.1
86.7
0.2
0.4


 6 months
101.6
101.6
97.8
0.5
1.4


12 months
102.4
102.4
98.6
0.7
1.9









Generally for this dose misoprostol potencies fall within 97% to 100% initial over the 12 month duration of the study at 25° C. The exception is the 3-month time point. At this test point the misoprostol potency was found to be 86.7% of the initial value. This is out of character with the other test points at this temperature for this batch and of other batches tested at this test point for the same storage condition. For levels of 8-iso misoprostol, no change over the study period at 25° C. with maximums of 0.7% label found. Misoprostol A levels increase slightly over the 12-month period, reaching maximum levels of 1.9% label.


2.2.2 200 μg Dose Batch


Shown in Table 8 are the misoprostol potencies and the levels of degradation product/impurities found for the desiccated 200 μg batch, over 12 months at 25° C.









TABLE 8







Misoprostol potency degradation product/impurities levels of


desiccated 200 μg batch, over 12 months at 25° C.












8-iso



Time
Misoprostol
misoprostol
Misoprostol A












Point
μg/unit
% Label
% Initial
% Label
% Label















Initial
209.2
104.6
100.0
1.0
0.6


12 months
202.0
101.0
96.6
1.1
2.6









Misoprostol potency drops very slightly over the 12 month duration of the study at 25° C. for this dose, down to 96.6% initial. Levels of 8-iso misoprostol show no change over the study period at 25° C. with maximums of 1.1% label found. Misoprostol A levels increase slightly over the 12-month period, reaching maximum levels of 2.6% label.


2.2.3 400 μg Dose Batch


Shown in Table 9 are the misoprostol potencies and the levels of degradation product/impurities found for the desiccated 400 μg batch, over 12 months at 25° C.









TABLE 9







Misoprostol potency degradation product/impurities levels of


desiccated 400 μg batch, over 12 months at 25° C.












8-iso



Time
Misoprostol
misoprostol
Misoprostol A












Point
μg/unit
% Label
% Initial
% Label
% Label















Initial
424.3
414.0
100.0
1.0
0.5


 4 weeks
424.4
106.1
100.0
1.0
0.8


 6 months
409.1
102.3
96.4
1.6
1.2


12 months
408.3
102.1
96.2
0.8
2.2









Misoprostol potency drops very slightly over the 12-month duration of the study at 25° C. for this dose, down to 96.2% initial. Levels of 8-iso misoprostol show no change over the study period at 25° C. although a maximum of 1.6% label is found at 6 months. Misoprostol A levels increase slightly over the 12-month period, reaching maximum levels of 2.2% label


2.2.4 100 μg-400 μg Doses—Summary of Findings for Desiccated Doses—Storage at 25° C.


For all three desiccated doses, misoprostol potency drops very slightly over the 12-month duration of the study at 25° C. Generally potencies fall within 96% to 100% of the initial values. The exception being the 100 μg batch after 4 weeks, which has a potency of 86.7% of the initial value. This is out of character with the other test points at this temperature for this batch. Levels of 8-iso misoprostol showed no change over the study period at 25° C. although a maximum of 1.6% label is found. Misoprostol A levels increase slightly over the 12 month period, reaching maximum levels of 2.6% label in the 200 μg batch, at 25° C.


2.3 Summary of Results for Both Desiccated and Undesiccated Misoprostol-Containing Hydrogels


Misoprostol potency and levels of degradation products/impurities remain unchanged after 12 months/15 months storage at −20° C. for both desiccated and undesiccated doses.


Desiccation appears to improve the stability of the misoprostol over 12 months at 4° C. and particularly at 25° C. and 40° C. At 25° C., after 12 months, desiccated batches have misoprostol potencies greater than 95% of their initial values, whereas undesiccated batches of the same dose have potencies ranging from 90% to 94% of their initial value. At 40° C., after 12 months desiccated doses have misoprostol potencies of typically 90% of their initial values, whereas undesiccated doses range from 83% to 88% of their initial values. Correspondingly, at 40° C. levels of misoprostol A are greater in undesiccated batches than desiccated batches of the same dose.


Generally misoprostol A is the main degradation product. 8-iso misoprostol stability remained relatively unchanged (results not shown).


Levels of the polymer stabilising excipient, butylated hydroxy anisole (BHA) remain fairly constant in all desiccated and undesiccated batches at 25° C. over 12 months.


Generally it was found that the misoprostol release data did not change over 12 months at conditions tested for either desiccated or undesiccated batches of the three doses (results not shown).


Loss on drying data shows no change over 12 months at 25° C. for undesiccated batches (results not shown). There was a decrease in loss on drying values for desiccated batches at 25° C. (results not shown).


% Swelling values remained within specification (275-3250) for all the desiccated doses at 25° C. over the 12-month study period (results not shown).


Use of desiccation enhances the stability of the misoprostol formulation.


Example 3
Comparative Stability Results at 25° C. for Polyurethane Hydrogel Loaded with Dinoprostone

The following Table 10 shows the stability of dinoprostone (a PGE2 prostaglandin) both as a bulk drug crystal and contained within a polyurethane hydrogel matrix at 25° C. Measurements are taken at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months. The following results are for comparative purposes only and are not intended to form part of the present invention.

  • [See also R. G. Stehle, 1982, Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 86, pp 436-458]











TABLE 10







Dinoprostone in


Test Point
Dinoprostone
the hydrogel


(months)
(% potency)
(% potency)

















0
100
103.5


1
96
90.9


2

83.0


3
89
75.3


6
75
57.1









The above results are also depicted in FIG. 2.


The stability of the dinoprostone contained in the hydrogel is decreased compared with the dinoprostone bulk drug itself.


Thus, in contrast to the misoprostol hydrogel formulation of the present invention, the formulation of dinoprostone in a hydrogel reduces its storage stability. Moreover, dinoprostone both with and without hydrogel shows marked degradation on storage.

Claims
  • 1. A method for the stabilization of a PGE1 analogue, comprising: drying a pharmaceutical delivery device comprising a polyurethane hydrogel and a PGE1 analogue disposed in the hydrogel, thereby achieving a water content of the hydrogel in the range of 0.1% to 0.2% by weight.
  • 2. A method according to claim 1, further comprising storing the delivery device at a temperature above 4° C. after drying.
  • 3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the delivery device is stored at a temperature of about 25° C.
  • 4. A method according to claim 3 wherein the polyurethane hydrogel is a cross-linked hydrogel.
  • 5. A method according to claim 3, wherein the PGE1 analogue is misoprostol and wherein when the delivery device is stored at 25° C., the misoprostol potency is 90 to 94% of its initial value after storage for 12 months.
  • 6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the delivery device contains 100 μg misoprostol and when the delivery device is stored at 25° C., the misoprostol potency is at least 94.2% of the initial value after storage for 12 months.
  • 7. A method according to claim 5, wherein the delivery device contains 200 μg misoprostol and when the delivery device is stored at 25° C., the misoprostol potency is at least 93.5% of the initial value after storage for 12 months.
  • 8. A method according to claim 5, wherein the delivery device contains 400 μg misoprostol and when the delivery device is stored at 25° C., the misoprostol potency is at least 90.1% of the initial value after storage for 12 months.
  • 9. A method according to claim 3, wherein the PGE1 analogue is misoprostol, and when the delivery device is stored at 25° C., the misoprostol potency is greater than 95% of its initial value after storage for 12 months.
  • 10. A method according to claim 9, wherein the delivery device contains 100 μg misoprostol and when the delivery device is stored at 25° C., the misoprostol potency is 97 to 100% of the initial value after storage for 12 months.
  • 11. A method according to claim 9, wherein the delivery device contains 200 μg misoprostol and when the delivery device is stored at 25° C., the misoprostol potency is at least 96.6% of the initial value after storage for 12 months.
  • 12. A method according to claim 9, wherein the delivery device contains 400 μg misoprostol and when the delivery device is stored at 25° C., the misoprostol potency is at least 96.2% of the initial value after storage for 12 months.
  • 13. A method according to claim 4 wherein the cross-linked polyurethane hydrogel is the reaction product of a polyethylene glycol, a triol and a diisocyanate.
  • 14. A method according to claim 13 wherein the triol is hexanetriol.
  • 15. A method according to claim 13 wherein said polyethylene glycol before reaction is selected from the group consisting of PEG2000, PEG4000, PEG6000 or PEG8000.
  • 16. A method according to claim 3 wherein the polyurethane hydrogel is a linear hydrogel.
  • 17. A method according to claim 16 wherein the linear polyurethane hydrogel is the reaction product of a polyethylene oxide, a difunctional compound and a difunctional isocyanate.
  • 18. A method according to claim 17 wherein the polyethylene oxide has a molecular weight ranging between 4000 and 35,000.
  • 19. A method according to claim 17 wherein the polyethylene oxide has an equivalent weight ranging between 4000 and 8000.
  • 20. A method according to claim 17, wherein the difunctional compound is selected from the group consisting of 1,6-hexanediol, 1,10-decanediol, 1,12-dodecanediol or 1,16-hexadecanediol.
  • 21. A method according to claim 20 wherein the delivery device is in the form selected from the group consisting of a suppository, a vaginal pessary, a buccal insert or an implant.
  • 22. A method according to claim 5 wherein said stabilized misoprostol is stable after storage at about 25° C. for twelve months compared to misoprostol oil.
  • 23. A method according to claim 1, wherein the water content is achieved by packaging the pharmaceutical delivery device with a desiccant.
  • 24. A method according to claim 1, wherein the pharmaceutical delivery device comprises 200 μg of the PGE1 analogue.
  • 25. A method according to claim 1, wherein the PGE1 analogue is misoprostol.
  • 26. A method for the stabilization of a PGE1 analogue comprising: drying a pharmaceutical delivery device comprising a polyurethane hydrogel and a PGE1 analogue disposed in the hydrogel, thereby achieving a water content of the hydrogel of less than 0.1% by weight.
  • 27. A method according to claim 26, wherein the water content is achieved by packaging the pharmaceutical delivery device with a desiccant.
  • 28. A method according to claim 26, wherein the pharmaceutical delivery device comprises 200 μg of the PGE1 analogue.
  • 29. A method according to claim 26, further comprising storing the delivery device at a temperature above 4° C. after drying.
  • 30. A method according to claim 26, wherein the PGE1 analogue is misoprostol.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
0417401.7 Aug 2004 GB national
US Referenced Citations (386)
Number Name Date Kind
3487068 Morozowich et al. Dec 1969 A
3565991 Short Feb 1971 A
3598122 Zaffaroni Aug 1971 A
3598123 Zaffaroni Aug 1971 A
3639157 Wunder et al. Feb 1972 A
3731683 Zaffaroni May 1973 A
3734097 Zaffaroni May 1973 A
3737521 Born Jun 1973 A
3760805 Higuchi Sep 1973 A
3797494 Zaffaroni Mar 1974 A
3830907 Short Aug 1974 A
3845761 Zaffaroni Nov 1974 A
3845770 Theeuwes et al. Nov 1974 A
3854480 Zaffaroni Dec 1974 A
3860701 Short Jan 1975 A
3867933 Kitrilakis Feb 1975 A
3881043 Rieser et al. Apr 1975 A
3892842 Zaffaroni Jul 1975 A
3896819 Zaffaroni Jul 1975 A
3901852 Shah Aug 1975 A
3916898 Robinson Nov 1975 A
3916899 Theeuwes et al. Nov 1975 A
3921636 Zaffaroni Nov 1975 A
3931113 Seeger et al. Jan 1976 A
3934580 Cournut Jan 1976 A
3941880 Short Mar 1976 A
3948254 Zaffaroni Apr 1976 A
3948262 Zaffaroni Apr 1976 A
3967618 Zaffaroni Jul 1976 A
3993072 Zaffaroni Nov 1976 A
3993073 Zaffaroni Nov 1976 A
3995631 Higuchi et al. Dec 1976 A
4018918 Ayer et al. Apr 1977 A
4034756 Higuchi et al. Jul 1977 A
4036227 Zaffaroni et al. Jul 1977 A
4036360 Deffeyes Jul 1977 A
4041208 Seeger et al. Aug 1977 A
4093708 Zaffaroni et al. Jun 1978 A
4096238 Zaffaroni et al. Jun 1978 A
4098747 Bailey et al. Jul 1978 A
4135514 Zaffaroni et al. Jan 1979 A
4142526 Zaffaroni et al. Mar 1979 A
4202880 Fildes et al. May 1980 A
4205115 Piccirilli et al. May 1980 A
4215691 Wong Aug 1980 A
4235988 Fildes et al. Nov 1980 A
4237885 Wong Dec 1980 A
4250611 Wong Feb 1981 A
4264757 Park Apr 1981 A
4276405 Koleske et al. Jun 1981 A
4286587 Wong Sep 1981 A
4289757 Glenn Sep 1981 A
4327727 Prahl et al. May 1982 A
4379915 Watanabe et al. Apr 1983 A
4402695 Wong Sep 1983 A
4404296 Schapel Sep 1983 A
4426485 Hoy et al. Jan 1984 A
4438225 Peerman Mar 1984 A
4447591 Watanabe et al. May 1984 A
4466936 Schapel Aug 1984 A
4503216 Fagerburg et al. Mar 1985 A
4568741 Livingston Feb 1986 A
4594240 Kawata et al. Jun 1986 A
4596576 de Nijs Jun 1986 A
4647596 Ishii et al. Mar 1987 A
4694238 Norton Sep 1987 A
4707495 Rosenthale et al. Nov 1987 A
4731289 Coleman Mar 1988 A
4767787 Kawata et al. Aug 1988 A
4804691 English et al. Feb 1989 A
4814182 Graham et al. Mar 1989 A
4818517 Kwee et al. Apr 1989 A
4895934 Matier et al. Jan 1990 A
4917686 Bayston et al. Apr 1990 A
4931288 Embrey et al. Jun 1990 A
4933418 Sterrett Jun 1990 A
4940588 Sparks et al. Jul 1990 A
4945149 Matsumoto et al. Jul 1990 A
4952402 Sparks et al. Aug 1990 A
4954043 Yoshida et al. Sep 1990 A
4973304 Graham et al. Nov 1990 A
5000955 Gould et al. Mar 1991 A
5002540 Brodman et al. Mar 1991 A
5017382 Embrey et al. May 1991 A
5023252 Hseih Jun 1991 A
5035891 Runkel et al. Jul 1991 A
5045622 Kohno et al. Sep 1991 A
5049638 Matsumoto et al. Sep 1991 A
5055516 Fisch et al. Oct 1991 A
5057573 Pascault et al. Oct 1991 A
5061254 Karakelle et al. Oct 1991 A
5079009 Embrey et al. Jan 1992 A
5100926 Kondo et al. Mar 1992 A
5110598 Kwan et al. May 1992 A
5114718 Damani May 1992 A
5116932 Fujiwa May 1992 A
5118779 Szycher Jun 1992 A
5130126 Koyama et al. Jul 1992 A
5156900 Nishimura Oct 1992 A
5159047 Simms Oct 1992 A
5176907 Leong Jan 1993 A
5178874 Kwan et al. Jan 1993 A
5219663 Kohno et al. Jun 1993 A
5219885 Frolich et al. Jun 1993 A
5252602 Alam et al. Oct 1993 A
5269321 MacDonald et al. Dec 1993 A
5283297 Miyachi et al. Feb 1994 A
5310759 Bockman May 1994 A
5312865 Hoefer et al. May 1994 A
5322063 Allen et al. Jun 1994 A
5324746 McKee et al. Jun 1994 A
5326632 Zenda et al. Jul 1994 A
5328954 Sarangapani Jul 1994 A
5354556 Sparks et al. Oct 1994 A
5374704 Muller et al. Dec 1994 A
5464868 Frolich et al. Nov 1995 A
5470829 Prisell et al. Nov 1995 A
5472785 Stobbie et al. Dec 1995 A
5474767 Tremont Dec 1995 A
5505962 Sparks Apr 1996 A
5510384 McKee et al. Apr 1996 A
5514698 Ahmad et al. May 1996 A
5527534 Myhling Jun 1996 A
5574102 Tanigami et al. Nov 1996 A
5578640 Hanson Nov 1996 A
5578643 Hanson Nov 1996 A
5605931 Hanson Feb 1997 A
5627254 Oriani May 1997 A
5634895 Igo et al. Jun 1997 A
5650171 Quigley et al. Jul 1997 A
5652274 Martin Jul 1997 A
5659003 Menovcik et al. Aug 1997 A
5676939 Tremont Oct 1997 A
5681278 Igo et al. Oct 1997 A
5681850 Frolich et al. Oct 1997 A
5686425 Lee Nov 1997 A
5693319 Tremont Dec 1997 A
5700483 Quigley et al. Dec 1997 A
5710215 Abend Jan 1998 A
5716676 Schutze et al. Feb 1998 A
5723552 Menovcik et al. Mar 1998 A
5726244 McGee et al. Mar 1998 A
5726274 Menovcik et al. Mar 1998 A
5731303 Hsieh Mar 1998 A
5733538 Riffle Mar 1998 A
5739113 Lee Apr 1998 A
5744550 Menovcik et al. Apr 1998 A
5747058 Tipton et al. May 1998 A
5747582 Schutze et al. May 1998 A
5760127 Bammel et al. Jun 1998 A
5763399 Lee Jun 1998 A
5770650 McGee et al. Jun 1998 A
5777048 Ohrbom et al. Jul 1998 A
5780049 Deckner et al. Jul 1998 A
5792810 Menovcik et al. Aug 1998 A
5795567 Tremont Aug 1998 A
5817343 Burke Oct 1998 A
5827925 Tremont et al. Oct 1998 A
5827930 Ohrbom et al. Oct 1998 A
5827931 Menovcik et al. Oct 1998 A
5843961 Kock et al. Dec 1998 A
5849803 Kock et al. Dec 1998 A
5853767 Melman Dec 1998 A
5854385 McGee et al. Dec 1998 A
5855906 McClay Jan 1999 A
5872195 Green et al. Feb 1999 A
5877216 Place et al. Mar 1999 A
5886039 Kock et al. Mar 1999 A
5888930 Smith et al. Mar 1999 A
5891915 Wysor et al. Apr 1999 A
5897879 Friedman et al. Apr 1999 A
5900433 Igo et al. May 1999 A
5935939 Kararli et al. Aug 1999 A
5942512 Kock et al. Aug 1999 A
5942545 Samour et al. Aug 1999 A
5948416 Wagner et al. Sep 1999 A
5959775 Joseph et al. Sep 1999 A
5965662 Krebs et al. Oct 1999 A
5968542 Tipton Oct 1999 A
5972372 Saleh et al. Oct 1999 A
5973002 Frolich et al. Oct 1999 A
5977172 Yoshikawa et al. Nov 1999 A
5985859 Luo Nov 1999 A
5994479 Green et al. Nov 1999 A
5994492 Graham et al. Nov 1999 A
6008312 Shirasaka Dec 1999 A
6013637 Klein et al. Jan 2000 A
6022554 Lee et al. Feb 2000 A
6028057 Burns Feb 2000 A
6031002 Wysor et al. Feb 2000 A
6039968 Nabahi Mar 2000 A
6040062 McGee et al. Mar 2000 A
6043224 Lee et al. Mar 2000 A
6046244 Buyuktimkin et al. Apr 2000 A
6080825 Ohrbom et al. Jun 2000 A
6084038 Ohrbom et al. Jul 2000 A
6086909 Harrison et al. Jul 2000 A
6093270 Ferencz et al. Jul 2000 A
6103256 Nabahi Aug 2000 A
6103765 Neal Aug 2000 A
6103852 Shirasaka Aug 2000 A
6114444 Rehfuss et al. Sep 2000 A
6117024 Dewanjee Sep 2000 A
6117843 Baroody et al. Sep 2000 A
6123963 Kim et al. Sep 2000 A
6126958 Saleh et al. Oct 2000 A
6130200 Brodbeck et al. Oct 2000 A
6130309 Reich et al. Oct 2000 A
6140453 Julia et al. Oct 2000 A
6150489 Pudleiner et al. Nov 2000 A
6160058 Ohrbom et al. Dec 2000 A
6184248 Lee et al. Feb 2001 B1
6187756 Lee et al. Feb 2001 B1
6188039 Gass Feb 2001 B1
6197327 Harrison et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210343 Kanakaris et al. Apr 2001 B1
6210441 Flodin Apr 2001 B1
6221997 Woodhouse et al. Apr 2001 B1
6284836 Hassel et al. Sep 2001 B1
6294550 Place et al. Sep 2001 B1
6303147 Gilis Oct 2001 B1
6303606 Leonardi et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306841 Place et al. Oct 2001 B1
6323241 Yeager et al. Nov 2001 B1
6328991 Myhling Dec 2001 B1
6335003 Kim et al. Jan 2002 B1
6346599 Goldberg et al. Feb 2002 B1
6403665 Sieker et al. Jun 2002 B1
6410595 Neal Jun 2002 B1
6413536 Gibson et al. Jul 2002 B1
6414027 Neal Jul 2002 B1
6414028 Büyüktimkin et al. Jul 2002 B1
6416779 D Augustine et al. Jul 2002 B1
6420510 Kaufhold et al. Jul 2002 B1
6423788 Bammel et al. Jul 2002 B1
6440568 Kayanoki et al. Aug 2002 B1
6469016 Place et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469055 Lee et al. Oct 2002 B2
6471955 Tremont et al. Oct 2002 B1
6472434 Place et al. Oct 2002 B1
6482345 Dewanjee Nov 2002 B1
6486207 Yeager et al. Nov 2002 B2
6488953 Halliday et al. Dec 2002 B2
6495157 Pena et al. Dec 2002 B1
6511388 Dewanjee Jan 2003 B1
6512073 Gertzmann et al. Jan 2003 B2
6521164 Plummer et al. Feb 2003 B1
6537970 Vulpescu et al. Mar 2003 B1
6543828 Gass Apr 2003 B1
6545119 Kizumoto et al. Apr 2003 B2
6559184 Neal May 2003 B2
6572874 Harrison et al. Jun 2003 B1
6586553 Mühlfeld et al. Jul 2003 B1
6589990 Kanakaris et al. Jul 2003 B1
6592472 Dewanjee Jul 2003 B2
6593313 Place et al. Jul 2003 B2
6593369 Neal Jul 2003 B2
6607686 Dewanjee Aug 2003 B2
6630050 Moeller et al. Oct 2003 B1
6632913 Matsumoto et al. Oct 2003 B2
6641064 Dentler et al. Nov 2003 B1
6642274 Neal Nov 2003 B1
6664290 El Dec 2003 B1
6693135 Yeager et al. Feb 2004 B2
6740333 Beckett et al. May 2004 B2
6790926 Spijkers et al. Sep 2004 B1
6794372 Del Soldato et al. Sep 2004 B2
6825234 Yeager et al. Nov 2004 B2
6841574 Mo et al. Jan 2005 B2
6953800 Leonardi et al. Oct 2005 B2
6992161 Kim et al. Jan 2006 B1
7053209 Gibson et al. May 2006 B1
7179481 Villanueva Feb 2007 B2
7485666 Villanueva et al. Feb 2009 B2
7670606 Volkmann Mar 2010 B2
7717892 Bartning May 2010 B2
7795467 Pacetti et al. Sep 2010 B1
7829112 Ron et al. Nov 2010 B2
7833543 Gibson et al. Nov 2010 B2
7833545 Ron et al. Nov 2010 B2
7838024 Ron et al. Nov 2010 B2
7883718 Ron et al. Feb 2011 B2
7892163 Bartning et al. Feb 2011 B2
20010014715 Blum et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010044467 Neal Nov 2001 A1
20010051656 Place et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010051694 Julia et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020004529 Neal Jan 2002 A1
20020013304 Wilson et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020028846 Yeager et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020037491 Halliday et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020039935 Dewanjee Apr 2002 A1
20020045665 Yeager et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020052407 Lee et al. May 2002 A1
20020062097 Simpson May 2002 A1
20020077442 Gertzmann et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020077444 Matsumoto et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020099003 Wilson et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020115814 Woodhouse et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020115976 Fleming Aug 2002 A1
20020119833 Dewanjee Aug 2002 A1
20020128314 Neal Sep 2002 A1
20020132965 Gertzmann et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020161009 Leonardi et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030022022 Kizumoto et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030032754 Kaufhold et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030032759 Fischer et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030045668 Fischer et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060589 Shimizu et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030122282 Plummer et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030129241 Yeager et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030134903 Yeager et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030144454 Krebs et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030158369 Slagel Aug 2003 A1
20030207852 Place et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030212139 Neal Nov 2003 A1
20040014761 Place et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040044080 Place et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040047910 Beckett et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040110843 Yeager et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040115229 Roby Jun 2004 A1
20040131664 Mo et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040142847 Bayersdoerfer et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040157766 Embil et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040265355 Shalaby Dec 2004 A1
20040266688 Nayak Dec 2004 A1
20050004226 Lu et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050013793 Beckman et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050031690 Rohrs et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050048104 Venkatraman et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050053639 Shalaby Mar 2005 A1
20050053670 Schaub Mar 2005 A1
20050070516 Wilson et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050090474 Naor Apr 2005 A1
20050095245 Riley et al. May 2005 A1
20050161030 Robert et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050169975 Suzuki et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050187342 Schieferstein et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050208152 Milankovits Sep 2005 A1
20050238722 Pathak et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050245902 Cornish et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060003950 Strugnell et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060018951 Maniar et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060041021 Wilson et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060052341 Cornish et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060078616 Georgewill et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060093675 Ebmeier et al. May 2006 A1
20060134161 Halliday Jun 2006 A1
20060183724 Diliberti et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060210599 Gibson et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070043332 Malcolm et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070128154 Hadba et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070135605 Hadba et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070148105 Spector Jun 2007 A1
20070155906 Hissink et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070166382 Kiser et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070282093 Yoshimura et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080009663 Bartning et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080009666 Bartning et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080108775 Schieferstein et al. May 2008 A1
20080140185 Kiser et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080145419 Gibson et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080152708 Gibson et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080199511 Sitruk-Ware et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080206310 Davis Aug 2008 A1
20080207571 Davis Aug 2008 A1
20080262613 Gogolewski Oct 2008 A1
20080271190 Holland Oct 2008 A1
20080286339 Ron et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090004246 Woolfson et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090011209 Steinberger et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090060982 Ron et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090061172 Hayashi et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090081278 De Graaff et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090203591 Bagchi et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090203772 Villanueva et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090291120 Tuominen et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100104619 De Graaff et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100203104 De Graaff et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100285094 Gupta Nov 2010 A1
20110045076 Kiser et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110056501 Kortesuo et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110059040 Kiser et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110077578 Bartning et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110091488 Halliday et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110150955 Klingman Jun 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (60)
Number Date Country
19842636 Mar 1999 DE
19742217 Apr 1999 DE
335669 Jan 1990 EP
424164 Apr 1991 EP
450176 Oct 1991 EP
401990 Jan 1992 EP
1063942 Jul 2002 EP
2557576 Jun 1988 FR
2705567 Dec 1994 FR
2047094 Nov 1980 GB
2047093 Dec 1983 GB
2244920 Dec 1991 GB
5600253 Mar 1980 JP
1135488 Feb 1983 JP
0670952 Mar 1994 JP
1150610 Jun 1999 JP
200502691 Mar 2000 JP
2001513550 Sep 2001 JP
2002515069 May 2002 JP
2011507405 Mar 2011 JP
WO 8001984 Oct 1980 WO
WO8905319 Jun 1989 WO
WO8907117 Aug 1989 WO
WO9102763 Mar 1991 WO
WO9403510 Feb 1994 WO
WO9413724 Jun 1994 WO
WO9422934 Oct 1994 WO
WO9606875 Mar 1996 WO
WO 9638153 May 1996 WO
WO9615171 May 1996 WO
WO9621427 Jul 1996 WO
WO9631551 Oct 1996 WO
WO9717386 May 1997 WO
WO 9724109 Jul 1997 WO
WO9724109 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9856323 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9909964 Mar 1999 WO
WO9947073 Sep 1999 WO
WO9947127 Sep 1999 WO
WO9956731 Nov 1999 WO
WO0000222 Jan 2000 WO
WO0040222 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0203896 Jan 2002 WO
WO 0209631 Feb 2002 WO
WO03011301 Feb 2003 WO
WO03087183 Oct 2003 WO
WO2004029125 Apr 2004 WO
WO2004084872 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2005063145 Jul 2005 WO
WO2005068533 Jul 2005 WO
WO2005089778 Sep 2005 WO
WO2005116100 Dec 2005 WO
WO2006013335 Feb 2006 WO
WO2006048639 May 2006 WO
WO2008007098 Jan 2008 WO
WO2009094573 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2010035837 Apr 2010 WO
WO 2010119029 May 2010 WO
WO 2011011099 Jan 2011 WO
WO 2011039418 Apr 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (38)
Entry
Sato et el, The effects of a prostaglandin E1 analogue, misoprostol, on gastric mucosal blood volume index and haemoglobin oxygenation in humans, Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2008, 2(6), 499-505.
Abraham, et al., “Bioresorbable poly(ester-ether urethane)s from L-Iysine diisocyanate and triblock copolymers with different hydrophilic character.” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A (2006) 76(4): 729-736.
Australian Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2010, which issued in corresponding Australian Application No. 2005268645.
Australian Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2010, which issued in corresponding Australian Application No. 2005268645.
Baimak et al., “Synthesis and characterization of poly(I-lactide-co-e-caprolactone) copolymers: Effect of stannous octoate initiator and diethylel glycol coinitiator concentration.” ScienceAsia 30 (2004):324-334.
Canadian Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2011, which issued in corresponding Canadian Application No. 2575933.
Casteneda, C.S., et al. “Misoprostol Dose Selection in a Controlled-Release Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 193:1071-1075, (Sep. 2005).
Chen, “Stabilization and sustained-release effect of Misoprostol with Methacrylate copolymer”, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 203 (2000) pp. 141-148.
Chinese Office Action mailed Oct. 12, 2010, which issued in corresponding Chinese Application No. 2005800261903.
Chinese Office Action mailed Nov. 13, 2009, which issued in corresponding Chinese Application No. 2005800261903.
Chinese Office Action mailed Apr. 23, 2010, which issued in corresponding Chinese Application No. 2005800261903.
Chinese Office Action mailed May 20, 2010, which issued in corresponding Chinese Application No. 2005800261903.
European Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2010, which issued in corresponding European Application No. 05763115.2.
European Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2011, which issued in corresponding European Application No. 05763115.2.
Indian Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2012, which issued in corresponding Indian Application No. 697/DELNP/2007.
Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 16, 2011, which issued in corresponding Japanese Application No. JP2007524389.
Japanese Office Action mailed Jan. 27, 2012, which issued in corresponding Japanese Application No. JP2007524389.
Jianzhong et al. “Polycaprolactone-poly(ethylene glycol) block copolymer III Drug release behavior.” Chinese J Polym Sci., 13(2) 1995:154:161.
Kararli, “Stabilization of Misoprostol with Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HMPC) Against Degradation by Water”, Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 7, No. 11 (1990).
Lee JW, et al., “Thermoreversible gelation of biodegradable poly(epsilon-caprolactone) and poly(ethylene glycol)multiblock copolymers in aqueous solutions.” J Control Release. Jun. 15, 2001; 73(2-3):315-27.
Leiva et al., “Poly(£-caprolactone)-block-poly(ethyleneoxide) -block-poly(£-V caprolactone): Biodegradable triblock copolymer spread at the air-water interface.” European Polymer Journal 44(8), Aug. 2008:2589-2598.
Merck Index (Ninth Edition, 1976, p. 4073).
Mexican Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2011, which issued in corresponding Mexican Application No. MX/a/2007/00115.
New Zealand Examination Report mailed May 1, 2009, which issued in corresponding New Zealand Application No. 552756.
PCT/GB2003/004208 International Search Report dated Jan. 2, 2004.
PCT/GB2005/002951 Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Oct. 6, 2005.
PCT/GB2005/002951 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 6, 2007.
PCT/GB207/002604, International Search Report, dated Jul. 12, 2007.
PCTGB207 002604 Written Opinion of International Searching Authority Jul. 12, 2007.
PCT/GB2005/002951 International Search Report dated Oct. 20, 2005.
PCT/GB2007/002401 International Search Report dated Oct. 24, 2007.
PCT/GB2007/002401 Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Oct. 24, 2007.
PCT/GB2007/002415 International Search Report dated Oct. 30, 2007.
PCT/GB2007/002415 Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Oct. 30, 2007.
Santerre, et al., “Understanding the biodegradation of polyurethanes: From classical implants to tissue engineering materials.” Biomaterials 26(35), Dec. 2005: 7457-7470.
Tyagi, P., et al., “Sustained Intravesical Drug Delivery Using Thermosensitive Hydrogel,” Pharmaceutical Research, 21 (5):832-837 (May 2004).
Yu, J., et al. “Blood interactions with novel polyurethaneurea hydrogels,” Biomaterials 12(2): 119-120 (1991).
Zhou et al., “Biodegradable poly(e-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene glycol) block copolymers: characterization and their use as drug carriers for a controlled delivery system.” Biomaterials (2003) 24(20): 3563-3570.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120184615 A1 Jul 2012 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11573256 US
Child 13429678 US