Patent Grant
11079645
This disclosure generally relates to touch input for display devices with control of angular illumination for use in privacy display and low stray light displays.
Privacy displays provide image visibility to a primary user (that is typically in an on-axis position) and reduced visibility of image content to a snooper, that is typically in an off-axis position. A privacy function may be provided by micro-louvre optical films that transmit a higher luminance from a display in an on-axis direction with lower luminance in off-axis positions, however such films are not electrically switchable, and thus the display is limited to privacy only function.
Switchable privacy displays may be provided by control of the off-axis optical output.
Control of off-axis privacy may be provided by means of contrast reduction, for example by adjusting the liquid crystal out of plane tilt in an In-Plane-Switching LCD.
Control may be further provided by means of off-axis luminance reduction. Luminance reduction may be achieved by means of switchable backlights for a liquid crystal display (LCD) spatial light modulator. Off-axis luminance reduction may also be provided by switchable liquid crystal retarders, polarisers and compensation retarders arranged to modulate the input and/or output directional luminance profile of a spatial light modulator.
Touch screens are arranged to receive input locations from observer fingers or a stylus and may comprise capacitive touch, resistive touch, electro-magnetic resonance and other known touch sensing technologies.
According to a first aspect of the present disclosure there is provided a display device comprising: a spatial light modulator, a display polariser arranged on a side of the spatial light modulator, the display polariser being a linear polariser; an additional polariser arranged on the same side of the spatial light modulator as the display polariser, the additional polariser being a linear polariser; and at least one polar control retarder arranged between the additional polariser and the display polariser, wherein the at least one polar control retarder comprises a switchable liquid crystal retarder comprising: first and second support substrates; a liquid crystal layer disposed between the first and second transparent support substrates, the liquid crystal layer comprising non-curable liquid crystal material and cured polymer material; electrodes arranged to apply a voltage for controlling the liquid crystal layer; and respective liquid crystal alignment layers supported on the first and second substrates adjacent the liquid crystal layer for aligning the non-curable liquid crystal material. The cured polymer material may comprise an acrylate or a thiol material. Cross-linked networks may be conveniently provided within the liquid crystal layer. Advantageously luminance and reflectivity artefacts during applied mechanical force due to liquid crystal cell thickness variations and liquid crystal flow variations may be reduced.
The cured polymer material may comprise a cured liquid crystal material. The cured liquid crystal material may comprise a reactive mesogen. The cured liquid crystal material may have an alignment that is aligned with the alignment of the non-curable liquid crystal material in a state in which a predetermined voltage is applied to the electrodes. Advantageously light scatter in one mode of operation may be reduced. Relaxation time for artefacts may be reduced. Thin flexible devices may be provided with low visibility of artefacts during folding.
The predetermined voltage may be capable of causing the layer of cured liquid crystal material and non-curable liquid crystal material simultaneously to introduce no net relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the display polariser along an axis along a normal to the plane of the at least one polar control retarder and to introduce a net relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the additional polariser along an axis inclined to a normal to the plane of the at least one polar control retarder. Advantageously the scatter may be reduced in a privacy mode of operation achieving increased visual security level. The scatter may be increased in a public mode of operation, achieving increased uniformity.
The cured liquid crystal material may be arranged in a network that extends between the two support substrates. The cured liquid crystal material may be a reactive mesogen. The ratio of the volume of the cured liquid crystal material to the volume of the non-curable liquid crystal material may be less than 5%. The network may be attached to each of the two support substrates. The electrodes may be disposed on opposite sides of the liquid crystal layer. A cured network may be provided that provides mechanical connection between the substrates across the area of the device. The optical properties of the switchable liquid crystal layer may be determined substantially by the properties of the non-curable liquid crystal material. Advantageously a stable liquid crystal layer that provides high resistance to image artefacts arising from applied mechanical force.
The display device may further comprise a control system arranged to control the voltage applied to the electrodes of the switchable liquid crystal retarder. Advantageously the display may be switched between a privacy mode and a public mode of operation.
The at least one polar control retarder may further comprise at least one passive compensation retarder. Advantageously the polar region in which high visual security level for an off axis snooper is extended.
The switchable liquid crystal retarder may comprise two surface alignment layers disposed adjacent to the liquid crystal material on opposite sides thereof and each may be arranged to provide homeotropic alignment at the adjacent liquid crystal material. The layer of liquid crystal material of the switchable liquid crystal retarder may comprise a liquid crystal material with a negative dielectric anisotropy. The layer of liquid crystal material may have a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 500 nm to 1000 nm, preferably in a range from 600 nm to 900 nm and most preferably in a range from 700 nm to 850 nm. The at least one passive retarder may comprise at least one passive retarder having an optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder, the at least one passive retarder having a total retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from −300 nm to −900 nm, preferably in a range from −450 nm to −800 nm and most preferably in a range from −500 nm to −725 nm; or the at least one passive retarder comprises a pair of passive retarders which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, each passive retarder of the pair of passive retarders having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 300 nm to 800 nm, preferably in a range from 500 nm to 700 nm and most preferably in a range from 550 nm to 675 nm. Advantageously a public mode may be provided with high image visibility over a wide polar region. Power consumption for operation in public mode may be reduced.
The switchable liquid crystal retarder may comprise two surface alignment layers disposed adjacent to the layer of liquid crystal material and on opposite sides thereof and each arranged to provide homogeneous alignment in the adjacent liquid crystal material. The layer of liquid crystal material of the switchable liquid crystal retarder comprises a liquid crystal material with a positive dielectric anisotropy. The layer of liquid crystal material may have a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 500 nm to 900 nm, preferably in a range from 600 nm to 850 nm and most preferably in a range from 700 nm to 800 nm. The at least one passive retarder may comprise at least one passive retarder having an optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder, the at least one passive retarder having a total retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from −300 nm to −700 nm, preferably in a range from −350 nm to −600 nm and most preferably in a range from −700 nm to −500 nm; or the at least one passive retarder comprises a pair of passive retarders which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, each passive retarder of the pair of passive retarders having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 300 nm to 800 nm, preferably in a range from 350 nm to 650 nm and most preferably in a range from 450 nm to 550 nm. Advantageously increased stability to applied mechanical force in comparison to homeotropic alignment may be achieved. In privacy mode a large polar region with high visual security level may be achieved. Thin flexible switchable retarders may be provided with high resilience to applied mechanical force.
According to a second aspect of the present disclosure there is provided a method of manufacturing a switchable liquid crystal retarder which is a polar control retarder for a display device, the method comprising: providing first and second support substrates having electrodes for controlling a liquid crystal layer and having first and second liquid crystal alignment layers supported thereon for aligning liquid crystal material of the liquid crystal layer; disposing a liquid crystal layer disposed between the first and second transparent support substrates with the first and second liquid crystal alignment layers adjacent the liquid crystal layer, the liquid crystal layer comprising non-curable liquid crystal material and curable liquid crystal material; curing the curable liquid crystal material while applying a predetermined voltage to the electrodes. Advantageously in operation low image scatter may be achieved in at least one mode of operation while achieving high resilience to applied mechanical force.
The predetermined voltage may be capable of causing the layer of cured liquid crystal material and the non-curable liquid crystal material simultaneously to introduce no net relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the additional polariser along an axis along a normal to the plane of the at least one polar control retarder and to introduce a net relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the additional polariser along an axis inclined to a normal to the plane of the at least one polar control retarder. The predetermined voltage may be non-zero. Advantageously the mode with low image scatter may be the privacy mode, such that the visual security level to an off-axis snooper is increased. Public mode image uniformity may be increased.
The curable liquid crystal material may be a reactive mesogen. Advantageously the reactive mesogen may be aligned by the applied voltage and alignment layers of the liquid crystal retarder.
The liquid crystal layer may further comprise a polymerisation photo-initiator, and the step of curing the curable liquid crystal material is performed by applying light radiation, and preferably ultraviolet light radiation to the liquid crystal layer. Advantageously a uniform liquid crystal layer may be provided.
Embodiments of the present disclosure may be used in a variety of optical systems. The embodiment may include or work with a variety of projectors, projection systems, optical components, displays, microdisplays, computer systems, processors, self-contained projector systems, visual and/or audio-visual systems and electrical and/or optical devices. Aspects of the present disclosure may be used with practically any apparatus related to optical and electrical devices, optical systems, presentation systems or any apparatus that may contain any type of optical system. Accordingly, embodiments of the present disclosure may be employed in optical systems, devices used in visual and/or optical presentations, visual peripherals and so on and in a number of computing environments.
Before proceeding to the disclosed embodiments in detail, it should be understood that the disclosure is not limited in its application or creation to the details of the particular arrangements shown, because the disclosure is capable of other embodiments. Moreover, aspects of the disclosure may be set forth in different combinations and arrangements to define embodiments unique in their own right. Also, the terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation.
Directional backlights offer control over the illumination emanating from substantially the entire output surface controlled typically through modulation of independent LED light sources arranged at the input aperture side of an optical waveguide. Controlling the emitted light directional distribution can achieve single person viewing for a security function, where the display can only be seen by a single viewer from a limited range of angles; high electrical efficiency, where illumination is primarily provided over a small angular directional distribution; alternating left and right eye viewing for time sequential stereoscopic and autostereoscopic display; and low cost.
These and other advantages and features of the present disclosure will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading this disclosure in its entirety.
Embodiments are illustrated by way of example in the accompanying FIGURES, in which like reference numbers indicate similar parts, and in which:
Terms related to optical retarders for the purposes of the present disclosure will now be described.
In a layer comprising a uniaxial birefringent material there is a direction governing the optical anisotropy whereas all directions perpendicular to it (or at a given angle to it) have equivalent birefringence.
The optical axis of an optical retarder refers to the direction of propagation of a light ray in the uniaxial birefringent material in which no birefringence is experienced. This is different from the optical axis of an optical system which may for example be parallel to a line of symmetry or normal to a display surface along which a principal ray propagates.
For light propagating in a direction orthogonal to the optical axis, the optical axis is the slow axis when linearly polarized light with an electric vector direction parallel to the slow axis travels at the slowest speed. The slow axis direction is the direction with the highest refractive index at the design wavelength. Similarly the fast axis direction is the direction with the lowest refractive index at the design wavelength.
For positive dielectric anisotropy uniaxial birefringent materials the slow axis direction is the extraordinary axis of the birefringent material. For negative dielectric anisotropy uniaxial birefringent materials the fast axis direction is the extraordinary axis of the birefringent material.
The terms half a wavelength and quarter a wavelength refer to the operation of a retarder for a design wavelength λ0 that may typically be between 500 nm and 570 nm. In the present illustrative embodiments exemplary retardance values are provided for a wavelength of 550 nm unless otherwise specified.
The retarder provides a relative phase shift between two orthogonal polarization components of the light wave incident thereon and is characterized by the amount of relative phase, Γ, that it imparts on the two polarization components In some contexts, the term “phase shift” is used without the word “relative” but still meaning relative phase shift. The relative phase shift is related to the birefringence Δn and the thickness d of the retarder by:
Γ=2·π·Δn·d/λ0 eqn. 1
In eqn. 1, Δn is defined as the difference between the extraordinary and the ordinary index of refraction, i.e.
Δn=ne−no eqn. 2
For a half-wave retarder, the relationship between d. Δn, and λ0 is chosen so that the phase shift between polarization components is Γ=π. For a quarter-wave retarder, the relationship between d, Δn, and λ0 is chosen so that the phase shift between polarization components is γ=π/2.
The term half-wave retarder herein typically refers to light propagating normal to the retarder and normal to the spatial light modulator.
Some aspects of the propagation of light rays through a transparent retarder between a pair of polarisers will now be described.
The state of polarisation (SOP) of a light ray is described by the relative amplitude and phase shift between any two orthogonal polarization components. Transparent retarders do not alter the relative amplitudes of these orthogonal polarisation components but act only on their relative phase. Providing a net phase shift between the orthogonal polarisation components alters the SOP whereas maintaining net relative phase preserves the SOP.
A linear SOP has a polarisation component with a non-zero amplitude and an orthogonal polarisation component which has zero amplitude.
A linear polariser transmits a unique linear SOP that has a linear polarisation component parallel to the electric vector transmission direction of the linear polariser and attenuates light with a different SOP.
Absorbing polarisers are polarisers that absorb one polarisation component of incident light and transmit a second orthogonal polarisation component. Examples of absorbing linear polarisers are dichroic polarisers.
Reflective polarisers are polarisers that reflect one polarisation component of incident light and transmit a second orthogonal polarisation component. Examples of reflective linear polarisers are multilayer polymeric film stacks such as DBEF™ or APF™ from 3M Corporation, or wire grid polarisers such as ProFlux™ from Moxtek.
A retarder arranged between a linear polariser and a parallel linear analysing polariser that introduces no relative net phase shift provides full transmission of the light other than residual absorption within the linear polariser.
A retarder that provides a relative net phase shift between orthogonal polarisation components changes the SOP and provides attenuation at the analysing polariser.
In the present disclosure an ‘A-plate’ refers to an optical retarder utilizing a layer of birefringent material with its optical axis parallel to the plane of the layer.
A ‘positive A-plate’ refers to positively birefringent A-plates, i.e. A-plates with a positive Δn.
In the present disclosure a ‘C-plate’ refers to an optical retarder utilizing a layer of birefringent material with its optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the layer. A ‘positive C-plate’ refers to positively birefringent C-plate. i.e. a C-plate with a positive Δn. A ‘negative C-plate’ refers to a negatively birefringent C-plate, i.e. a C-plate with a negative Δn.
‘O-plate’ refers to an optical retarder utilizing a layer of birefringent material with its optical axis having a component parallel to the plane of the layer and a component perpendicular to the plane of the layer. A ‘positive O-plate’ refers to positively birefringent O-plates, i.e. O-plates with a positive Δn.
Achromatic retarders may be provided wherein the material of the retarder is provided with a retardance Δn·d that varies with wavelength λ as
Δn·d/λ=κ eqn. 3
where κ is substantially a constant.
Examples of suitable materials include modified polycarbonates from Teijin Films. Achromatic retarders may be provided in the present embodiments to advantageously minimise colour changes between polar angular viewing directions which have low luminance reduction and polar angular viewing directions which have increased luminance reductions as will be described below.
Various other terms used in the present disclosure related to retarders and to liquid crystals will now be described.
A liquid crystal cell has a retardance given by Δn·d where Δn is the birefringence of the liquid crystal material in the liquid crystal cell and d is the thickness of the liquid crystal cell, independent of the alignment of the liquid crystal material in the liquid crystal cell.
Homogeneous alignment refers to the alignment of liquid crystals in switchable liquid crystal displays where molecules align substantially parallel to a substrate. Homogeneous alignment is sometimes referred to as planar alignment. Homogeneous alignment may typically be provided with a small pre-tilt such as 2 degrees, so that the molecules at the surfaces of the alignment layers of the liquid crystal cell are slightly inclined as will be described below. Pretilt is arranged to minimise degeneracies in switching of cells.
In the present disclosure, homeotropic alignment is the state in which rod-like liquid crystalline molecules align substantially perpendicularly to the substrate. In discotic liquid crystals homeotropic alignment is defined as the state in which an axis of the column structure, which is formed by disc-like liquid crystalline molecules, aligns perpendicularly to a surface. In homeotropic alignment, pretilt is the tilt angle of the molecules that are close to the alignment layer and is typically close to 90 degrees and for example may be 88 degrees.
In a twisted liquid crystal layer, a twisted configuration (also known as a helical structure or helix) of nematic liquid crystal molecules is provided. The twist may be achieved by means of a non-parallel alignment of alignment layers. Further, cholesteric dopants may be added to the liquid crystal material to break degeneracy of the twist direction (clockwise or anti-clockwise) and to further control the pitch of the twist in the relaxed (typically undriven) state. A supertwisted liquid crystal layer has a twist of greater than 180 degrees. A twisted nematic layer used in spatial light modulators typically has a twist of 90 degrees.
Liquid crystal molecules with positive dielectric anisotropy are switched from a homogeneous alignment (such as an A-plate retarder orientation) to a homeotropic alignment (such as a C-plate or O-plate retarder orientation) by means of an applied electric field.
Liquid crystal molecules with negative dielectric anisotropy are switched from a homeotropic alignment (such as a C-plate or O-plate retarder orientation) to a homogeneous alignment (such as an A-plate retarder orientation) by means of an applied electric field.
Rod-like molecules have a positive birefringence so that ne>no as described in eqn. 2. Discotic molecules have negative birefringence so that ne<ne.
Positive retarders such as A-plates, positive O-plates and positive C-plates may typically be provided by stretched films or rod-like liquid crystal molecules. Negative retarders such as negative C-plates may be provided by stretched films or discotic like liquid crystal molecules.
Parallel liquid crystal cell alignment refers to the alignment direction of homogeneous alignment layers being parallel or more typically antiparallel. In the case of pre-tilted homeotropic alignment, the alignment layers may have components that are substantially parallel or antiparallel. Hybrid aligned liquid crystal cells may have one homogeneous alignment layer and one homeotropic alignment layer. Twisted liquid crystal cells may be provided by alignment layers that do not have parallel alignment, for example oriented at 90 degrees to each other.
Transmissive spatial light modulators may further comprise retarders between the input display polariser and the output display polariser for example as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,237,876, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Such retarders (not shown) are in a different place to the passive retarders of the present embodiments. Such retarders compensate for contrast degradations for off-axis viewing locations, which is a different effect to the luminance reduction for off-axis viewing positions of the present embodiments.
A private mode of operation of a display is one in which an observer sees a low contrast sensitivity such that an image is not clearly visible. Contrast sensitivity is a measure of the ability to discern between luminances of different levels in a static image. Inverse contrast sensitivity may be used as a measure of visual security, in that a high visual security level (VSL) corresponds to low image visibility.
For a privacy display providing an image to an observer, visual security may be given as:
VSL=(Y+R)/(Y−K) eqn. 4
where VSL is the visual security level, Y is the luminance of the white state of the display at a snooper viewing angle, K is the luminance of the black state of the display at the snooper viewing angle and R is the luminance of reflected light from the display.
Panel contrast ratio is given as:
C=Y/K eqn. 5
For high contrast optical LCD modes, the white state transmission remains substantially constant with viewing angle. In the contrast reducing liquid crystal modes of the present embodiments, white state transmission typically reduces as black state transmission increases such that
Y+K˜P·L eqn. 6
The visual security level may then be further given as:
where off-axis relative luminance, P is typically defined as the percentage of head-on luminance, L at the snooper angle and the display may have image contrast ratio C and the surface reflectivity is ρ.
The off-axis relative luminance, P is sometimes referred to as the privacy level. However, such privacy level P describes relative luminance of a display at a given polar angle compared to head-on luminance, and is not a measure of privacy appearance.
The display may be illuminated by Lambertian ambient illuminance I. Thus in a perfectly dark environment, a high contrast display has VSL of approximately 1.0. As ambient illuminance increases, the perceived image contrast degrades, VSL increases and a private image is perceived.
For typical liquid crystal displays the panel contrast C is above 100:1 for almost all viewing angles, allowing the visual security level to be approximated to:
VSL=1+I·ρ/(π·P·L) eqn. 8
In comparison to privacy displays, desirably wide angle displays are easily observed in standard ambient illuminance conditions. One measure of image visibility is given by the contrast sensitivity such as the Michelson contrast which is given by:
M=(Imax−Imin)/(Imax+Imin) eqn. 9
and so:
M=((Y+R)−(K+R))/((Y+R)+(K+R))=(Y−K)/(Y+K+2·R) eqn. 10
Thus the visual security level (VSL), is equivalent (but not identical to) 1/M. In the present discussion, for a given off-axis relative luminance, P the wide angle image visibility, W is approximated as
W=1/VSL=1/(1+I·ρ/(π·P·L)) eqn. 11
Switchable directional display apparatuses for use in privacy display for example and comprising plural retarders arranged between a display polariser and an additional polariser are described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,126,575 and in U.S. Patent Publ. No. 2019-0086706, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties. Directional display apparatuses further comprising reflective polarisers arranged between the display polariser and retarders are described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,303,030 U.S. and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/256,120 filed Jan. 24, 2019, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties. Directional display polarisers comprising passive retarders arranged between a display polariser and an additional polariser are described in U.S. Patent Publ. No. 2018-0321553, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Also herein incorporated by reference in its entirety is U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/256,754 filed Jan. 24, 2019.
The structure and operation of various switchable display devices will now be described. In this description, common elements have common reference numerals. It is noted that the disclosure relating to any element applies to each device in which the same or corresponding element is provided. Accordingly, for brevity such disclosure is not repeated.
It would be desirable to provide high image quality during touch input for a switchable directional display apparatus comprising a switchable liquid crystal retarder arranged between a display output polariser and an additional polariser for use in displays such as privacy displays.
Finger 25 location is detected by means of detection of distortion of field lines 570, 572 provided by the touch electrode arrays 500, 502 and control system comprising touch drivers 452, 454, touch controller 450 and system controller 460. At least one dielectric layer 504 is arranged between the switchable liquid crystal layer 314 and the additional polariser 318. The first and second touch electrode arrays 500, 502 are arranged on opposite sides of the dielectric layer 504.
In
The spatial light modulator 48 is arranged to output light 700 and comprises a display polariser 218 arranged on the output side of the spatial light modulator 48; an additional polariser 318 arranged on the output side of the display polariser 218; a reflective polariser 302 arranged between the display polariser 218 and the additional polariser 318; and at least one retarder 300 arranged between the reflective polariser 302 and the additional polariser 318. The display polariser 218 and additional polariser 318 are linear polarisers.
The display 100 is typically operated in environments with external illumination 604. Reflection of such illumination is used to provide increased visual security level to snoopers when the display operates in a privacy mode as will be described further below.
Plural retarders 300 comprises a switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 comprising a layer 314 of non-curable liquid crystal material 414 and cured liquid crystal material 420. The layer 314 is arranged between transparent support substrates 312, 316 and between the display polariser 218 and the additional polariser 318.
Electrodes 413, 415 and alignment layers 418A, 418B are arranged on the facing surfaces of support substrates 312, 316 respectively to provide electrical control and alignment respectively to the layer 314 of non-curable liquid crystal material 414.
The control system comprises a system controller 460 that is arranged to (i) provide image data to the spatial light modulator 48 by means of spatial light modulator controller 250 (ii) provide control of the voltage driver 350 to control the drive voltage V applied to the switchable liquid crystal retarder and (iii) and to control the signal applied to and measured from the touch electrode arrays 500, 502 by means of touch controller 450 and touch drivers 452, 454.
Reflective polariser 302 is arranged between the display polariser 218 and the plural retarders 300. The electric vector transmission direction 303 of the reflective polariser 302 is parallel to the electric vector transmission direction 219 of the display polariser 218 and electric vector transmission direction 319 of the additional polariser 318.
Plural retarders 300 are arranged between the display polariser 218 and the additional polariser 318. Plural retarders 300 comprise: the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 liquid crystal layer 314 arranged between input and output transparent support substrates 312, 316; and two passive compensation retarders 330A, 330B arranged between the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 and the additional polariser 318. The at least one passive compensation retarder 330 comprises a pair of passive uniaxial retarders 330A, 330B having optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed.
More generally the display polariser 218 is arranged on a side of the spatial light modulator 48, the display polariser 218 being a linear polariser. An additional polariser 318 is arranged on the same side of the spatial light modulator 48 as the display polariser 218, the additional polariser 318 being a linear polariser. In the case that the spatial light modulator is a transmissive spatial light modulator 48, the additional polariser 318 may alternatively or additionally be arranged between backlight 20 and input polariser 210 of the spatial light modulator. In the case that the spatial light modulator 48 is an emissive spatial light modulator, the plural retarders 300 and additional polariser 318 are arranged on the output side of the output polariser 218.
At least one polar control retarder 300 is arranged between the additional polariser 318 and the display polariser 218, wherein the at least one polar control retarder 300 comprises a switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 comprising: first and second support substrates 312, 316; a liquid crystal layer 314 disposed between the first and second transparent support substrates 312, 316, the liquid crystal layer 314 comprising non-curable liquid crystal material 414 and cured liquid crystal material 420. The cured liquid crystal material may be a reactive mesogen as will be further described below.
Electrodes 413, 415 are arranged to apply a voltage for controlling the liquid crystal layer 314; and respective liquid crystal alignment layers 418A, 418B supported on the first and second the support substrates 312, 316 adjacent the liquid crystal layer 314 for aligning the non-curable liquid crystal material 414.
Dielectric layer 504 is arranged between the passive retarders 330A, 330B. The first and second touch electrode arrays 500, 502 may be provided on at least one surface of at least one passive compensation retarder 330. The touch electrode arrays may be arranged on the facing surfaces of the pair of passive uniaxial retarders 330A, 330B. The dielectric layer 504 may comprise an adhesive layer provided between the touch electrode arrays 500, 502 arranged on the facing surfaces of the pair of passive uniaxial retarders 330A, 330B. The dielectric layer 504 may comprise for example an optically clear adhesive (OCA) or pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA), or may be provided by another dielectric material.
Touching finger 25 may be near or in contact with substrate 320 that may be a glass cover or hard coated polymer layer with an oleophobic hard coating to achieve mechanical robustness and resistance to finger grease. Touch control may also be provided by a pen or stylus.
As will be described further herein the layer 314 comprises cured liquid crystal material 420 that is provided as a network 424 comprising cross linked bonds 422 between the molecules of the material 420.
Spacers 370 that comprise sticky spacer balls and/or polymer walls may be provided. Advantageously some resistance to applied mechanical force may be provided. Visibility of flow of non-curable liquid crystal material 414 may be reduced.
The structure and operation of an arrangement of plural retarders will now be described.
The passive retarders 330A, 330B are composed of non-switching molecules 408A, 408B respectively.
The switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 comprises two surface alignment layers 418A, 418B disposed adjacent to the layer 314 of non-curable liquid crystal material 414 and on opposite sides thereof and each arranged to provide homogeneous alignment in the adjacent non-curable liquid crystal material 414. Advantageously in comparison to homeotropic alignment, the homogeneous alignment provides a high restoring force for the molecules of the non-curable liquid crystal material 414.
The switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 and passive retarders 330 may be replaced by any of those described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,126,575, in U.S. Patent Publ. No. 2019-0086706, in U.S. Pat. No. 10,303,030, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/256,120 filed Jan. 24, 2019, in U.S. Provisional Patent Appl. No. 62/756,902 filed Nov. 7, 2018, and in U.S. Provisional Patent Appl. No. 62/844,980 filed May 8, 2019, all of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.
The switchable liquid crystal layer 314 is driven by a first voltage V1 in the privacy mode. Molecules of non-curable liquid crystal material 414 and cured liquid crystal material 420 are aligned with the same alignment, that is the variation of tilt of the molecules through the thickness of the layer 314 is the same for the cured material 422 and non-curable material 420.
The switchable liquid crystal layer 314 is driven by a second voltage V2 in the public mode. Molecules of non-curable liquid crystal material 414 and cured liquid crystal material 420 are aligned with different alignments, that is the variation of tilt through the layer 314 is different for the material 420 and the material 422. The alignment of liquid crystals in the layer 314 will be described with reference to
Some of the cured liquid crystal material 420A may be arranged in a network 424 that extends between the two support substrates 312, 316 and the network 424 is attached to each of the two support substrates 312, 316. Some of the cured liquid crystal material 420B may be arranged to be attached to the support substrates 312, 316.
In privacy mode, the switchable liquid crystal layer 314 the predetermined voltage V1 causes the layer 314 of cured liquid crystal material 420 and the non-curable liquid crystal material 414 simultaneously to introduce no net relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the additional polariser 318 along an axis 199 along a normal to the plane of the at least one polar control retarder 300 and to introduce a net relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the additional polariser along an axis 197 inclined to a normal to the plane of the at least one polar control retarder 300. Such variation of phase shift when combined with passive retarders 330 and analysed by polarisers 218, 302 and 318 provides polar variations of transmission and reflectivity such as those illustrated in
In public mode, the switchable liquid crystal layer 314 is driven by V2 that is different to the predetermined voltage V1. The voltage V2 causes the layer 314 of non-curable liquid crystal material 414 simultaneously to introduce no net relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the additional polariser 318 along an axis 199 along a normal to the plane of the at least one polar control retarder 300 and to introduce a substantially reduced net relative phase shift to orthogonal polarisation components of light passed by the additional polariser along an axis 197 inclined to a normal to the plane of the at least one polar control retarder 300. Such variation of phase shift when combined with passive retarders 330 and analysed by polarisers 218, 302 and 318 provides polar variations of transmission and reflectivity such as those illustrated in
The network 424 of cured liquid crystal material 414 is attached to substrates 312, 316. Distortion of the thickness of the layer 314 during applied mechanical force is reduced. The retardance of the layer 314 is substantially maintained and the said net relative phase shift introduced by applied mechanical force is maintained for both privacy and public modes of operation. Advantageously luminance and reflectivity artefacts in the region of the applied mechanical force are reduced. In other words, during applied force the liquid crystal layer 314 thickness may vary creating undesirable retardance profiles in the layer 314. The network 424 of aligned cured liquid crystal molecules 420 provides resistance to changes in the cell gap, achieving a achieving a uniform retardance profile across the display area. Advantageously the visibility of artefacts due to changes of layer 314 thickness is reduced.
The molecules 420B that are arranged near to the substrates 312, 316 may be arranged to increase the restoring force of the molecules 414 after application of mechanical force. Advantageously visibility of artefacts may be reduced.
During applied mechanical force, non-curable liquid crystal material 414 may flow within the layer 314. Such flow may provide disclinations which adjust the retardance properties of the layer 314, and change the said net relative phase shift. Such undesirable disclinations will be illustrated in
The cured liquid crystal material 420 provides an increased restoring force for non-curable liquid crystal material 414, prevents the formation of large area disclinations and may reduce the relaxation time of disclinations after flow. Advantageously the time for which luminance and reflectivity artefacts in the region of the applied mechanical force are visible may be reduced and the size of artefacts may be reduced.
In privacy mode, light scatter in the layer 314 undesirably directs image data to snooper locations, and reduces the visual security level. Molecules of non-curable liquid crystal material 414 and cured liquid crystal material 420 are aligned with a common alignment. Light scatter is reduced and advantageously privacy mode visual security level is increased.
In public mode, light scatter may be provided in the layer 314 due to the misalignment between the molecules of materials 414, 420. Advantageously such scatter provides increased angular luminance uniformity in public mode, increasing the image visibility for off-axis users.
During applied force flow of non-curable liquid crystal material 414 may occur in the liquid crystal layer 314. Flow may result in undesirable liquid crystal misalignment and dislocations that may provide visual artefacts. The network 424 of aligned cured liquid crystal molecules 420 provides resistance to flow of non-curable liquid crystal material 414. The amount of retardance change and disclinations in the layer 314 due to flow is reduced and advantageously the visibility of artefacts due to material flow is reduced.
In privacy mode, the drive voltage V1 may be lower than the drive voltage V2 for the public mode as illustrated in TABLE 1 below for the embodiments of
In the present embodiments, the molecules of materials 414, 420 are aligned in the driven state for a given voltage V1 and the restoring force provided by the molecules of the cured liquid crystal material 420 provides the same energy minimum as provided by the drive voltage V1. The total restoring force on the molecules 414 is increased, reducing the size and decay time of disclinations. Advantageously the visibility of artefacts is reduced.
In the public mode has reduced time for artefact visibility due to the restoring force provided by the high drive voltage. Advantageously the time for visibility and size of flow artefacts are reduced in both privacy and public modes of operation.
In public mode, the voltage V2 provides a phase structure with a slow polar variation of luminance and reflectivity with polar angle as will be described in
Features of the arrangements of
The optical output of an illustrative embodiment will now be described.
The layer 314 of non-curable liquid crystal material 414 of the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 comprises a non-curable liquid crystal material 414 with a positive dielectric anisotropy.
In the present embodiments, desirable ranges for retardations and voltages have been established by means of simulation of retarder stacks and experiment with display optical stacks. Ranges for retardances will now be described that provide design configurations for various optical layers.
The predetermined voltage is non-zero. The layer 314 of non-curable liquid crystal material 414, 420 has a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 500 nm to 900 nm, preferably in a range from 600 nm to 850 nm and most preferably in a range from 700 nm to 800 nm.
The at least one passive retarder 330 comprises a pair of passive retarders 330A, 330B which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, each passive retarder 330A, 330B of the pair of passive retarders having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 300 nm to 800 nm, preferably in a range from 350 nm to 650 nm and most preferably in a range from 450 nm to 550 nm.
In another embodiment (not shown) the at least one passive retarder 330 may comprise at least one passive retarder 330 having an optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder 330, the at least one passive retarder 330 having a total retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from −300 nm to −700 nm, preferably in a range from −350 nm to −600 nm and most preferably in a ranges from −400 nm to −500 nm. The passive retarders may be provided using stretched films to advantageously achieve low cost and high uniformity.
The passive polar control retarder 330 is provided by a pair of A-plates 330A, 330B that have crossed axes. In the present embodiments, ‘crossed’ refers to an angle of substantially 90° between the optical axes of the two retarders in the plane of the retarders. To reduce cost of retarder materials, it is desirable to provide materials with some variation of retarder orientation due to stretching errors during film manufacture for example. Variations in retarder orientation away from preferable directions can reduce the head-on luminance and increase the minimum transmission. Preferably the angle between the optical axes in the plane of the retarders is at least 35° and at most 55°, more preferably at least 40° and at most 50° and most preferably at least 42.5° and at most 47.5°.
Profile 441 illustrates non-curable liquid crystal material 414 tilt angle for 0V applied voltage; tilt profile 443 illustrates director orientations for privacy mode such as an applied voltage V1 of 2.5V; and tilt profile 445 illustrates director orientations for public mode such as an applied voltage V2 of 5V. Thus the director profiles through the thickness of the cell for the privacy and wide angle modes. The cured liquid crystal material 420 of the present embodiments has a profile 443 for both privacy mode and public mode. By comparison, the non-curable liquid crystal material 414 switches between the profile 445 in public mode and 443 in private mode.
In operation, applied pressure may distort the profiles 443, 445. Distortion of profile 443 is more visible than profile 445. Advantageously the present embodiments achieve increased resistance of the non-curable liquid crystal material to deviate from the profile 443. Image artefacts are reduced during applied pressure.
A method to manufacture a stabilised liquid crystal retarder for a switchable privacy display that has low visibility of artefacts during applied mechanical force will now be given.
A method of manufacturing a switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 which is a polar control retarder for a display device 100 comprises in a first step shown in
The curable liquid crystal material 420 may be a reactive mesogen. A reactive mesogen (RM) is a low molecular weight liquid crystalline material containing a reactive end group that is polymerizable by visible or UV light. RMs have the intrinsic features of liquid crystals including self-organisation, anisotropic optical and dielectric properties, and controlled alignment defined by a surface alignment layer for example rubbed polyimide; at the same time, they can be polymerized in to networks structures or solid materials with their liquid crystalline alignments and anisotropic properties retained. By way of example as opposed to limitation, example reactive mesogen material include RM257 and RM488 marketed by Merck Ltd. Example photo initiators include Irgacure 651 marketed by Ciba.
The ratio of the volume of the curable liquid crystal material 420 to the volume of the non-curable liquid crystal material 414 may be less than 5%. Advantageously scatter may be reduced and visual security level in privacy mode increased.
Network 424 may comprise networks of cured liquid crystal materials 420 and cured isotropic materials 421. Cross linking may be provided between the cured polymer materials 420, 421 by means of bonding between the liquid crystal materials 420, between the isotropic materials 422 or between the liquid crystal materials 420 and isotropic materials 421. Advantageously increased resistance to applied mechanical force may be achieved.
In other words, a method to manufacture a liquid crystal retarder for a privacy display device 100 comprises the steps of: (i) providing first and second transparent support substrates 312, 316 with electrodes 413, 415 on at least one side of each of the first and second transparent support substrates 312, 316; (ii) forming a liquid crystal alignment layer 418A, 418B on an electrode 413, 415 of each of the first and second transparent support substrates 312, 316; (iii) providing a liquid crystal layer 314 between the alignment layers; wherein the liquid crystal layer 314 comprises (a) a non-curable liquid crystal material 414 and (b) a curable liquid crystal material 420; (iv) applying a curing step voltage across the electrodes; and (v) curing the curable liquid crystal material 420. The curing step voltage V1 is the voltage at which the liquid crystal retarder is driven to provide a privacy mode of operation of the display device (such as illustrated in
As illustrated in
Advantageously a switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 may be provided for use in a switchable privacy display 100 that has low visibility of artefacts due to applied pressure during touch operation.
It would be desirable to reduce the thickness of the polar control retarder 300 while achieving high image quality during touch operation.
In comparison to the arrangements of
The passive compensation retarder 330 comprises a negative C-plate retarder having an optical axis that is a fast axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder. Thus the material 430 of the C-plate retarder may have a negative dielectric anisotropy. C-plates may comprise transparent birefringent materials such as: polycarbonates or reactive mesogens that are cast onto a substrate that provides homeotropic alignment for example: Zeonex™ Cyclo Olefin Polymer (COP); discotic polymers; and Nitto Denko™ double stretched polycarbonates.
The switchable liquid crystal retarder of
The optical output of the arrangement of
The passive polar control retarder 330 comprises first and second C-plates 330A, 330B- and the switchable liquid crystal layer 314 is provided between the first and second C-plates 330A, 330B. The switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 comprises two surface alignment layers 418A, 418B disposed adjacent to the layer 314 of non-curable liquid crystal material 414 and on opposite sides thereof and each arranged to provide homogeneous alignment in the adjacent non-curable liquid crystal material 414. The layer of non-curable liquid crystal material 414 of the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 comprises a non-curable liquid crystal material 414 with a positive dielectric anisotropy.
In the present embodiments, desirable ranges for retardations and voltages have been established by means of simulation of retarder stacks and experiment with display optical stacks. Ranges for retardances will now be described that provide design configurations for various optical layers.
The layer of liquid crystal material 314 has a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 500 nm to 1000 nm, preferably in a range from 600 nm to 900 nm and most preferably in a range from 700 nm to 850 nm. The two passive retarders 330A, 330B each comprises a passive retarder having an optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder and the total retardance of the two passive retarders for light of a wavelength of 550 nm is in a range from −300 nm to −700 nm, preferably in a range from −350 nm to −600 nm and most preferably in a range from −400 nm to −500 nm.
Advantageously high optical performance can be achieved in privacy and public modes of operation in very low thickness embodiments.
The operation of privacy displays will now be described further.
Display 100 may be provided with white regions 603 and black regions 601. A snooper 47 may observe an image on the display if luminance difference between the observed regions 601, 603 can be perceived. In operation, primary user 45 observes a full luminance images by rays 700 to viewing locations 26 that may be optical windows of a directional display. Snooper 47 observes reduced luminance rays 402 in viewing locations 27 that may for example be optical windows of a directional display comprising an imaging waveguide. Regions 26, 27 further represent on-axis and off-axis regions of polar graphs of
Thus some light rays 404 may be reflected by the front surface of the additional polariser 318 and other surfaces of the display. Typically, such reflectivity may be 4% for a bonded optical stack at normal incidence and approximately 5% for a bonded optical stack for 45 degrees incidence, due to Fresnel reflections at the air-polariser interface. Thus a low luminance reflected image 605 of source 604 may be observed by the snooper on the front of the display 100.
Advantageously the image seen by user 45 has high luminance and image visibility and the image seen by snooper 47 has low luminance and high visual security level.
Features of the arrangement of
The appearance of artefacts due to applied force applied to liquid crystal layers without the cured liquid crystal material 420 of the present embodiments will now be described.
Such disclinations provide undesirable image artefacts over relatively large areas and that last several seconds, and are unacceptable for display appearance.
It would be desirable to provide increased uniformity of public mode of operation.
The substrate 316 may be provided by the retarder 330 to advantageously reduce thickness while the substrate 312 may be provided by a stiffer substrate material such as glass to increase rigidity and advantageously reduce the visibility of artefacts arising from applied force during touch operation.
The switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 comprises two surface alignment layers 418A, 418B disposed adjacent to the non-curable liquid crystal material 414 on opposite sides thereof and arranged to provide homeotropic alignment at the adjacent non-curable liquid crystal material 414. The non-curable liquid crystal material 414 may be provided with a pretilt, for example 88 degrees from the horizontal to remove degeneracy of non-curable liquid crystal material 414 alignment. The cured liquid crystal material 420 may have the same alignment as for the non-curable liquid crystal material 420 when driven with the privacy mode voltage V1. Thus in the public mode the alignment of the materials 414, 420 is different and advantageously some scatter may be provided to increase uniformity.
In comparison to the embodiments of TABLES 1 and 2, the liquid crystal retarder alignment is provided by a homeotropic rather than homogeneous alignment. Advantageously the wide angle mode performance of
The layer of liquid crystal material of the switchable liquid crystal retarder comprises a liquid crystal material with a negative dielectric anisotropy.
The switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 comprises two surface alignment layers 418A, 418B disposed adjacent to the non-curable liquid crystal material 414 on opposite sides thereof and each arranged to provide homeotropic alignment at the adjacent non-curable liquid crystal material 414.
In the present embodiments, desirable ranges for retardations and voltages have been established by means of simulation of retarder stacks and experiment with display optical stacks. Ranges for retardances will now be described that provide design configurations for various optical layers.
The layer of liquid crystal material has a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 500 nm to 1000 nm, preferably in a range from 600 nm to 900 nm and most preferably in a range from 700 nm to 850 nm.
The at least one passive retarder comprises a passive retarder having an optical axis perpendicular to the plane of the retarder, the passive retarder having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from −300 nm to −900 nm, preferably in a range from −450 nm to −800 nm and most preferably in a range from −500 nm to −725 nm; or (not shown) the at least one passive retarder comprises a pair of passive retarders which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders that are crossed, each passive retarder of the pair of passive retarders having a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 300 nm to 800 nm, preferably in a range from 500 nm to 700 nm and most preferably in a range from 550 nm to 675 nm.
The switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 comprises two surface alignment layers disposed on electrodes 413, 415 and adjacent to the layer of non-curable liquid crystal material 414 and on opposite sides thereof and each arranged to provide homeotropic alignment in the adjacent non-curable liquid crystal material 414. The layer of non-curable liquid crystal material 414 of the switchable liquid crystal retarder 301 comprises a liquid crystal material with a negative dielectric anisotropy. The liquid crystal molecules 414 may be provided with a pretilt, for example 88 degrees from the horizontal to remove degeneracy in switching.
For a homeotropically aligned mode with no voltage applied as illustrated in
A method to form the switchable liquid crystal layer of
A method to manufacture a liquid crystal retarder for a privacy display device 100 comprises the steps of: (i) providing first and second transparent support substrates 312, 316 with electrodes 413, 415 on at least one side of each of the first and second transparent support substrates 312, 316; (ii) forming a liquid crystal alignment layer on an electrode 413, 415 of each of the first and second transparent support substrates 312, 316; (iii) providing a liquid crystal layer 314 between the alignment layers; wherein the liquid crystal layer 314 comprises (a) a non-curable liquid crystal material 414 and (b) a cured liquid crystal material 420; and the liquid crystal layer 314 has a retardance for light of a wavelength of 550 nm in a range from 500 nm to 1000 nm, preferably in a range from 600 nm to 900 nm and most preferably in a range from 700 nm to 850 nm; (iv) applying a curing step voltage across the electrodes; and (v) curing the curable liquid crystal material 420. The curing step voltage V1 is the voltage at which the liquid crystal retarder is driven to provide a privacy mode of operation of the display device (such as illustrated in
In further detail, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The operation of polar control retarder layers between parallel polarisers for off-axis illumination will now be described further. In the various devices described above, at least one polar control retarder is arranged between the reflective polariser 318 and the additional polariser 218 in various different configurations. In each case, the at least one polar control retarder is configured so that it does not affect the luminance of light passing through the reflective polariser 318, the at least one polar control retarder, and the additional polariser 218 along an axis along a normal to the plane of the polar control retarder(s) but it does reduce the luminance of light passing through the reflective polariser 318, the at least one polar control retarder, and the additional polariser 218 along an axis inclined to a normal to the plane of the polar control retarder(s), at least in one of the switchable states of the compensated switchable polar control polar control retarder 300. There will now be given a description of this effect in more detail, the principles of which may be applied in general to all of the devices described above.
Normal light rays 636 propagate so that the path length in the material is the same as the thickness 631. Light rays 637 are in the y-z plane have an increased path length; however the birefringence of the material is substantially the same as the rays 636. By way of comparison light rays 638 that are in the x-z plane have an increased path length in the birefringent material and further the birefringence is different to the normal ray 636.
The retardance of the polar control retarder 630 is thus dependent on the angle of incidence of the respective ray, and also the plane of incidence, that is rays 638 in the x-z will have a retardance different from the normal rays 636 and the rays 637 in the y-z plane.
The interaction of polarized light with the polar control retarder 630 will now be described. To distinguish from the first and second polarization components during operation in a directional backlight 101, the following explanation will refer to third and fourth polarization components.
At the design wavelength and for light propagating normally along ray 636 then the output polarization may be rotated by 90 degrees to a linear polarization state 640 at −45 degrees. Light propagating along ray 637 may see a phase difference that is similar but not identical to the phase difference along ray 637 due to the change in thickness, and thus an elliptical polarization state 639 may be output which may have a major axis similar to the linear polarization axis of the output light for ray 636.
By way of contrast, the phase difference for the incident linear polarization state along ray 638 may be significantly different, in particular a lower phase difference may be provided. Such phase difference may provide an output polarization state 644 that is substantially circular at a given inclination angle 642. Thus, the polar control retarder 630 introduces a phase shift to polarisation components of light passed by the polariser on the input side of the polar control retarder 630 along an axis corresponding to ray 638 that is inclined to a normal to the plane of the polar control retarder 630. Although
To illustrate the off-axis behaviour of polar control retarder stacks, the angular luminance control of C-plates 330A, 330B between an additional polariser 318 and output display polariser 218 will now be described for various off-axis illumination arrangements with reference to the operation of a C-plate between the parallel polarisers 500, 210 will now be described.
To illustrate the off-axis behaviour of polar control retarder stacks, the angular luminance control of crossed A-plates 330A, 330B between an additional polariser 318 and output display polariser 218 will now be described for various off-axis illumination arrangements.
The output polarisation component is aligned to the electric vector transmission direction of the additional polariser 318, and thus is transmitted efficiently. Advantageously substantially no losses are provided for light rays that have zero lateral angle angular component so that full transmission efficiency is achieved.
Thus the polar control retarder comprises a pair of retarders 330A, 330B which have optical axes in the plane of the retarders 330A, 330B that are crossed, that is the x-y plane in the present embodiments. The pair of retarders 330A, 330B have optical axes 331A, 331B that each extend at 45° with respect to an electric vector transmission direction that is parallel to the electric vector transmission of the polariser 318.
Advantageously substantially no losses are provided for light rays that have zero elevation angular component so that full transmission efficiency is achieved.
Thus luminance is reduced for light rays that have non-zero lateral angle and non-zero elevation components. Advantageously display privacy can be increased for snoopers that are arranged in viewing quadrants while luminous efficiency for primary display users is not substantially reduced.
As may be used herein, the terms “substantially” and “approximately” provide an industry-accepted tolerance for its corresponding term and/or relativity between items. Such an industry-accepted tolerance ranges from zero percent to ten percent and corresponds to, but is not limited to, component values, angles, et cetera. Such relativity between items ranges between approximately zero percent to ten percent.
While various embodiments in accordance with the principles disclosed herein have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of this disclosure should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with any claims and their equivalents issuing from this disclosure. Furthermore, the above advantages and features are provided in described embodiments, but shall not limit the application of such issued claims to processes and structures accomplishing any or all of the above advantages.
Additionally, the section headings herein are provided for consistency with the suggestions under 37 CFR 1.77 or otherwise to provide organizational cues. These headings shall not limit or characterize the embodiment(s) set out in any claims that may issue from this disclosure. Specifically and by way of example, although the headings refer to a “Technical Field,” the claims should not be limited by the language chosen under this heading to describe the so-called field. Further, a description of a technology in the “Background” is not to be construed as an admission that certain technology is prior art to any embodiment(s) in this disclosure. Neither is the “Summary” to be considered as a characterization of the embodiment(s) set forth in issued claims. Furthermore, any reference in this disclosure to “invention” in the singular should not be used to argue that there is only a single point of novelty in this disclosure. Multiple embodiments may be set forth according to the limitations of the multiple claims issuing from this disclosure, and such claims accordingly define the embodiment(s), and their equivalents, that are protected thereby. In all instances, the scope of such claims shall be considered on their own merits in light of this disclosure, but should not be constrained by the headings set forth herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4621898 | Cohen | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4974941 | Gibbons et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5005108 | Pristash et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5035491 | Kawagishi et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5658490 | Sharp et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5715028 | Abileah et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5808784 | Ando et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5835166 | Hall et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5894361 | Yamazaki et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5914760 | Daiku | Jun 1999 | A |
| 6055103 | Woodgate et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6099758 | Verrall et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6144433 | Tillin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6204904 | Tillin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6222672 | Towler et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6392727 | Larson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6437915 | Moseley et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 7067985 | Adachi | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7163319 | Kuo et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7227602 | Jeon et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7524542 | Kim et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7528893 | Schultz et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7528913 | Kobayashi | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7633586 | Winlow et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7660047 | Travis et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7766534 | Iwasaki | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7834834 | Takatani et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7970246 | Travis et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7991257 | Coleman | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 8098350 | Sakai et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8154686 | Mather et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8237876 | Tan et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8249408 | Coleman | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8262271 | Tillin et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8646931 | Choi et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8801260 | Urano et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8939595 | Choi et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8973149 | Buck | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9195087 | Terashima | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9274260 | Urano et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9304241 | Wang et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9324234 | Ricci et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9448355 | Urano et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9501036 | Kang et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9519153 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 10054732 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10126575 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2018 | B1 |
| 10303030 | Robinson et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10401638 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10488705 | Xu et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10649248 | Jiang et al. | May 2020 | B1 |
| 10649259 | Lee et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
| 20020024529 | Miller et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020171793 | Sharp et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030089956 | Allen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030107686 | Sato et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20040015729 | Elms et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040100598 | Adachi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040125430 | Kasajima et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040145703 | O'Connor et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040240777 | Woodgate et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050111100 | Mather et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050117186 | Li et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050157225 | Toyooka et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050190326 | Jeon et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050190329 | Okumura | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050219693 | Hartkop et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060066785 | Moriya | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060082702 | Jacobs et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060203162 | Ito et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060215244 | Yosha et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060244884 | Jeon | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060262258 | Wang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060262558 | Cornelissen | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060268207 | Tan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060285040 | Kobayashi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070035964 | Olczak | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070047254 | Schardt et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070064163 | Tan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070139772 | Wang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070223251 | Liao | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070285775 | Lesage et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080068329 | Shestak et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080158491 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080285310 | Aylward et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080316198 | Fukushima | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090040426 | Mather et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090085894 | Gandhi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090086509 | Omori et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090128735 | Larson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090128746 | Kean et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090174843 | Sakai et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090213298 | Mimura et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090213305 | Ohmuro et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090244415 | Ide | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100002296 | Choi et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100128200 | Morishita et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100149459 | Yabuta et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177113 | Gay et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100205667 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100238376 | Sakai et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100283930 | Park et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100289989 | Adachi et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100295755 | Broughton et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100328438 | Ohyama et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110018860 | Parry-Jones et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110032483 | Hruska et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110241983 | Chang | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110286222 | Coleman | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110321143 | Angaluri et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120002121 | Pirs et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120086875 | Yokota | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120127573 | Robinson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120147280 | Osterman et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235891 | Nishitani et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120294037 | Holman et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120299913 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120314145 | Robinson | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120327101 | Blixt et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130039062 | Vintner et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130100097 | Martin | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130107174 | Yun et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130128165 | Lee | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130242231 | Kurata et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130278544 | Cok | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130293793 | Lu | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130300985 | Bulda | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130307831 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130321340 | Seo et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130328866 | Woodgate et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140009508 | Woodgate et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140022619 | Woodgate et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140071382 | Scardato | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140098418 | Lin | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140111760 | Guo | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140132887 | Kurata | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140201844 | Buck | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140211125 | Kurata | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140232960 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140240344 | Tomono et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140240828 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140268358 | Kusaka et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140286043 | Sykora et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140289835 | Varshaysky et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140361990 | Leister | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150055366 | Chang et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150116212 | Freed et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150177447 | Woodgate et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150177563 | Cho et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150185398 | Chang et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150205157 | Sakai et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150268479 | Woodgate et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150286061 | Seo et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150286817 | Haddad et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150301400 | Kimura et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150346417 | Powell | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150346532 | Wook Do et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150378085 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160103264 | Lee et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160132721 | Bostick et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160147074 | Kobayashi et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160154259 | Kim | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160216420 | Gaides et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160216540 | Cho et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160224106 | Liu | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160238869 | Osterman et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160334898 | Kwak et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160349444 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160356943 | Choi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160357046 | Choi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170003436 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170031206 | Smith et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170090103 | Holman | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170092187 | Bergquist | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170092229 | Greenebaum et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170115485 | Saito et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170123241 | Su et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170139110 | Woodgate et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170168633 | Kwak et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170205558 | Hirayama et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170236494 | Sommerlade et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170269283 | Wang et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170269285 | Hirayama et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170329399 | Azam et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170336661 | Harrold et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170339398 | Woodgate et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170343715 | Fang et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180014007 | Brown | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180052346 | Sakai et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180082068 | Lancioni et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180095581 | Hwang et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180113334 | Fang | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180188576 | Xu et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180188603 | Fang et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180196275 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180210243 | Fang et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180231811 | Wu | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180252949 | Klippstein et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180259799 | Kroon | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180259812 | Goda et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180321523 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180321553 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180329245 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180364526 | Finnemeyer | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190086706 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190121173 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190154896 | Yanai | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190196236 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190197928 | Schubert et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190215509 | Woodgate et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190227366 | Harrold et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190235304 | Tamada et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190250458 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190293858 | Woodgate et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190293983 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190353944 | Acreman et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20200159055 | Robinson et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200225402 | Ihas et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2222313 | Jun 1998 | CA |
| 1125943 | Oct 2003 | CN |
| 1776484 | May 2006 | CN |
| 101681061 | Mar 2010 | CN |
| 104133292 | Nov 2014 | CN |
| 204740413 | Nov 2015 | CN |
| 209171779 | Jul 2019 | CN |
| 2418518 | Mar 2006 | GB |
| 2428100 | Jan 2007 | GB |
| 2482065 | Jan 2012 | GB |
| 2486935 | Sep 2013 | GB |
| H01130783 | Sep 1989 | JP |
| H11174489 | Jul 1999 | JP |
| 2007148279 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| 2007273288 | Oct 2007 | JP |
| 20120011228 | Feb 2012 | KR |
| 101990286 | Jun 2019 | KR |
| M537663 | Mar 2017 | TW |
| 2005071449 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| 2010021926 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| 2014011328 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| 2015040776 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| 2015057625 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| 2015143227 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| 2015157184 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| 2015190311 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| 2016195786 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| 2018035492 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| 2018208618 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| 2019055755 | Mar 2019 | WO |
| 2019067846 | Apr 2019 | WO |
| 2019147762 | Aug 2019 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Adachi, et al. “P-228L: Late-News Poster: Controllable Viewing-Angle Displays using a Hybrid Aligned Nematic Liquid Crystal Cell”, ISSN, SID 2006 Digest, pp. 705-708. |
| Brudy et al., “Is Anyone Looking? Mitigating Shoulder Surfing on Public Displays through Awareness and Protection”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Persuasive Displays (Jun. 3, 2014), pp. 1-6. |
| CN201780030715.3 Notification of the First Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2020. |
| EP-16860628.3 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated Apr. 26, 2019. |
| EP-17799963.8 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated Oct. 9, 2019. |
| Gass, et al. “Privacy LCD Technology for Cellular Phones”, Sharp Laboratories of Europe Ltd, Mobile LCD Group, Feb. 2007, pp. 45-49. |
| Ishikawa, T., “New Design for a Highly Collimating Turning Film”, SID 06 Digest, pp. 514-517. |
| Kalantar, et al. “Backlight Unit With Double Surface Light Emission,” J. Soc. Inf. Display, vol. 12, Issue 4, pp. 379-387 (Dec. 2004). |
| PCT/US2016/058695 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Feb. 28, 2017. |
| PCT/US2017/032734 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jul. 27, 2017. |
| PCT/US2018/031206 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jul. 20, 2018. |
| PCT/US2018/031218 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 21, 2019. |
| PCT/US2018/031218 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jul. 19, 2018. |
| PCT/US2018/051021 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Nov. 21, 2018. |
| PCT/US2018/051027 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Nov. 30, 2018. |
| PCT/US2018/053328 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Nov. 30, 2018. |
| PCT/US2018/059249 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jan. 3, 2019. |
| PCT/US2018/059256 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jan. 3, 2019. |
| PCT/US2019/014889 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated May 24, 2019. |
| PCT/US2019/014902 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jun. 25, 2019. |
| PCT/US2019/023659 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jun. 10, 2019. |
| PCT/US2019/038409 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Sep. 19, 2019. |
| PCT/US2019/038466 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Nov. 5, 2019. |
| PCT/US2019/042027 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Oct. 15, 2019. |
| PCT/US2019/054291 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jan. 6, 2020. |
| PCT/US2019/059990 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Feb. 28, 2020. |
| PCT/US2019/066208 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Feb. 27, 2020. |
| PCT/US2020/017537 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Apr. 29, 2020. |
| Weindorf et al., “Active Circular Polarizer OLED E-Mirror”, Proceedings of the Society for Information Display 25th Annual Symposium of Vehicle Displays, Livonia, MI, pp. 225-237, Sep. 25-16, 2018. |
| PCT/US2020/060155 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Feb. 5, 2021. |
| PCT/US2020/060191 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Feb. 8, 2021. |
| Robson, et al. “Spatial and temporal contrast-sensitivity functions of the visual system”, J. Opt. Soc. Amer., vol. 56, pp. 1141-1142 (1966). |
| PCT/US2020/053863 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Mar. 12, 2021. |
| PCT/US2020/063638 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Mar. 2, 2021. |
| PCT/US2020/064633 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Mar. 15, 2021. |
| Simonyan et al., “Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition”, ICLR 2015. |
| CN201880042320.X Notification of the First Office Action dated May 25, 2021. |
| EP-18855604.7 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated Jun. 1, 2021. |
| EP-18857077.4 Extended European Search Report of European Patent Office dated Jun. 16, 2021. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200004058 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62691896 | Jun 2018 | US | |
| 62789322 | Jan 2019 | US | |
| 62796423 | Jan 2019 | US |
