Stabilized 1-bromopropane composition

Abstract

A 1-bromopropane composition is disclosed, which stays stable even under the condition that it is repeatedly used at high temperatures over an extended period of time as in vapor degreasing. The stabilized 1-bromopropane composition comprises 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane, from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of nitromethane, and from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of 1,2-butylene oxide or trimethoxymethane.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a stabilized 1-bromopropane composition.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

For the degreasing of worked parts and precision parts having a large amount of mineral oils and fats attached thereto, metallic parts which are liable to stain or rust, small parts which are handled in a large amount in a cleaning basket, etc., chlorine solvents have been heretofore used for the most part, particularly 1,1,1-trichloroethane, which is a non-aqueous chlorine solvent excellent in properties such as high degreasing power and incombustibility.

In recent years, however, social awareness of global environmental issues has been increasing more and more, and this has led to a growing trend toward severer control on the discharge of environment-destroying substances. For example, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, which has been used in great quantities as an excellent degreasing detergent, is now on the list of substances destroying the ozone layer in the stratosphere. It was decided that the production of 1,1,1-trichloroethane shall be abolished by the end of 1995. Further, other chlorine solvents such as trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene involve environmental problems such as toxicity and contamination of underground water and have thus been gradually placed under restrictions. Accordingly, less pollutive substitute detergents for these chlorine solvents have been keenly demanded.

It is well known that a certain kind of bromohydrocarbon has a high dissolving power for various oils. For example, tribromomethane and 1,2-dibromopropane are described in JP-B-44-20082 (the term "JP-B" as used herein means an "examined Japanese patent publication"). 2,3-Dibromobutane and n-butyl bromide are described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,730,904. 1-Bromopropane and 2-bromopropane are described in JP-A-6-220494.

Among these bromohydrocarbons, 1-bromopropane is incombustible and has a detergent action equal to or higher than that of 1,1,1-trichloroethane but is disadvantageous in that it is liable to cause decomposition reaction induced by various metals such as aluminum, zinc, iron and copper.

The decomposition reaction of 1-bromopropane upon contact with a metal proceeds differently by the kind of the metal. This decomposition reaction shows a marked progress upon contact with aluminum. At ordinary temperatures, this decomposition reaction proceeds very slowly. Upon heating, this reaction involves a chain decomposition reaction while producing hydrogen bromide that eventually vigorously corrodes aluminum to convert 1-bromopropane to a dark brown tar substance. Accordingly, the essential requirement for the use of 1-bromopropane in the cleaning of various metallic parts is the stabilization of 1-bromopropane such that the decomposition of 1-bromopropane induced by various metals, particularly aluminum, is inhibited to prevent the materials to be cleaned and the cleaning apparatus from being corroded.

As an approach for inhibiting the decomposition reaction of 1-bromopropane induced by aluminum there is disclosed in JP-A-6-220494 a method which comprises the use of nitroalkanes, ethers, epoxides or amines singly or in combination as a stabilizer. However, the stabilizer composition disclosed as an example in the above cited Japanese patent application is disadvantageous in that it is not necessarily stable to metals commonly used as industrial metallic materials such as zinc, iron and copper and thus can corrode the materials to be cleaned or cleaning apparatus when used at high temperatures over an extended period of time, such as in vapor degreasing.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a stabilized 1-bromopropane composition which can be used in the cleaning of various industrial materials, including metallic products of zinc, iron, copper, etc., as well as aluminum, without corroding the articles to be cleaned or cleaning apparatus even after a prolonged use at high temperatures.

The foregoing object of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description and examples.

Under these circumstances, the inventors made extensive studies of the foregoing difficulties. As a result, the desired stabilized 1-bromopropane was found. The present invention has been thus worked out.

The present invention provides a stabilized 1-bromopropane composition, comprising 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane, from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of nitromethane and from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of 1,2-butylene oxide or trimethoxymethane

The present invention further provides a stabilizer for 1-bromopropane, which comprises from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of nitromethane and from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of 1,2-butylene oxide or trimethoxymethane.

The present invention also provides a method for improving the stability of 1-bromopropane which comprises adding to 1-bromopropane a stabilizer comprising from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of nitromethane and from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of 1,2-butylene oxide or trimethoxymethane, based on 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention will be further described hereinafter.

A stabilizer to be used in the present invention is a binary composition composed of nitromethane and 1,2-butylene oxide or trimethoxymethane. If this stabilizer lacks even one of the two components, satisfiable effects cannot be exerted.

For example, even if nitromethane is used singly, the decomposition reaction of 1-bromopropane upon contact with a metal can be inhibited. However, under the condition that 1-bromopropane should be repeatedly used at high temperatures over an extended period of time as in vapor degreasing, the water content in 1-bromopropane and 1-bromopropane react with each other to produce hydrogen bromide gas that corrodes the metal. If 1,2-butylene oxide or trimethoxymethane is used singly, no stabilizing effect can be recognized. It is thought that nitromethane inhibits the decomposition reaction of 1-bromopropane upon contact with a metal while 1,2-butylene oxide or trimethoxymethane captures hydrogen bromide gas to attain stabilization. Accordingly, only the combined use of 1-bromopropane and the binary stabilizer according to the present invention can exert a stabilization effect with respect to various metals such as zinc, iron and copper, as well as aluminum. The resulting effective stability can be maintained particularly under the condition that 1-bromopropane should be repeatedly used over an extended period of time at high temperatures as in vapor degreasing. The effective stability can be maintained in cleaning at ordinary temperatures.

The amount of the stabilizer to be added is composed of 0.1 to 5 parts by weight for nitromethane and 0.1 to 5 parts by weight for 1,2-butylene oxide or trimethoxymethane, based on 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane. If at least nitromethane and 1,2-butylene oxide or trimethoxymethane are added in an amount of from 0.1 to 1 part by weight and from 0.1 to 1 part by weight, respectively, based on 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane, a sufficient stabilization effect can be exerted. If the added amount of these components fall below the above defined lower limit, the desired effect cannot be maintained. On the contrary, even if the added amount of these components exceed the above defined upper limit, no further effects can be expected, though having no problems with the effect itself. This is economically disadvantageous.

The stabilizer according to the present invention may be used in combination with other various stabilizers. Examples of these stabilizers include cyclic ethers such as 1,4-dioxane, 1,3-dioxolane and 1,3,5-trioxane; chain ethers such as 1,2-dimethoxyethane; saturated alcohols such as isopropanol, tert-butyl alcohol and tert-amyl alcohol; unsaturated alcohols such as 2-methyl-3-butyne-2-ol; phenols such as phenol, thymol, 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol and catechol; and thiocyanic esters such as methyl thiocyanate and ethyl thiocyanate.

The 1-bromopropane composition obtained according to the present invention is useful as a detergent since it can maintain an effective stability without corroding the articles to be cleaned or cleaning apparatus or staining the articles to be cleaned particularly even under the condition that it should be repeatedly used at high temperatures over an extended period of time as in vapor degreasing.

The present invention will be further described in the following examples, but the present invention should not be construed as being limited thereto.

EXAMPLE 1

Into a 50-ml glass test tube was charged 10 ml of a 1-bromopropane composition obtained by adding 0.5 parts by weight of nitromethane and 0.5 parts by weight of 1,2-butylene oxide to 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane. An aluminum specimen (specification: JIS A-1100P (the term "JIS" as used herein means "Japanese Industrial Standard"); dimension: 13 mm.times.65 mm.times.3 mm) which had been thoroughly polished and cleaned was then placed in the test tube so as to extend over both the gaseous and liquid phases. An air condenser was attached to the top of the test tube and the 1-bromopropane composition was then refluxed in an oil bath. A pH-indicator paper was put in the air condenser. After 96 hours of refluxing, the reaction system was allowed to cool to room temperature. The aluminum specimen was taken out from the tube, and then observed for corrosion. The liquid phase was observed for coloration. Further, the pH-indicator paper was checked to see if hydrogen bromide gas was produced. The content of stabilizer components based on 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane and the test results are set forth in Table 1.

TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________Stabilizer composition (parts by weight).sup.1) Test Results Production 1,2-butylene Trimethoxy Metal Test ofTest No. Nitromethane oxide methane Specimen solution Acidic Gas__________________________________________________________________________Example 1 0.5 0.5 -- A A NoneExample 2 0.5 0.1 -- A A NoneExample 3 0.25 0.5 -- A A NoneExample 4 0.5 1 -- A A NoneExample 5 0.5 5 -- A A NoneExample 6 1 0.5 -- A A NoneExample 7 3 0.5 -- A A NoneExample 8 3 3 -- A A NoneExample 9 5 0.5 -- A A NoneExample 10 0.25 -- 0.5 A A NoneExample 11 0.5 -- 0.1 A A NoneExample 12 0.5 -- 0.5 A A NoneExample 13 0.5 -- 1 A A NoneExample 14 0.5 -- 5 A A NoneExample 15 1 -- 0.5 A A NoneExample 16 3 -- 0.5 A A NoneExample 17 3 -- 3 A A NoneExample 18 5 -- 0.5 A A NoneComparative -- -- -- D D ObservedExample 1Comparative 0.5 -- -- B A ObservedExample 2Comparative 1 -- -- B A ObservedExample 3Comparative 3 -- -- B A ObservedExample 4Comparative -- 3 -- D D ObservedExample 5Comparative -- 0.5 -- D D ObservedExample 6Comparative -- -- 1 D D ObservedExample 7Comparative 0.05 0.5 -- D D ObservedExample 8Comparative 0.05 -- 0.5 D D ObservedExample 9__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.1) Addition amount (parts by weight) based on 100 parts by weight of 1bromopropane

The criterion for evaluation of the external appearance of aluminum specimen and coloration of the test solution are as follows:

Criterion for evaluation of metal specimen A: No change observed B: Tarnish observed slightly on some area C: Tarnish observed on the entire area D: Definite discoloration or corrosion observed on the entire area Criterion for evaluation of test solution A: Colorless and transparent B: Slightly colored C: Definite coloration observed D: Marked coloration observed

EXAMPLES 2-18 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 1-9

The procedure of Example 1 was followed to examine a 1-bromopropane composition except that the composition and addition amount of the stabilizer according to the present invention were changed. The content of the stabilizer based on 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane and the test results are set forth in Table 1.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 10-27

The procedure of Example 1 was followed to examine a 1-bromopropane composition except that the stabilizer was changed. The content of the stabilizer based on 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane and the test results are set forth in Table 2.

TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________Stabilizer Conditions After Test Production Addition Metal Test ofTest No. Compound Name Amount.sup.1) Specimen Solution Acidic Gas__________________________________________________________________________Comparative 1,4-Dioxane 3 D D ObservedExample 10Comparative 1,2-Dimethoxyethane 5 D D ObservedExample 11Comparative Acetone 3 D D ObservedExample 12Comparative 1,3-Dioxolane 3 A A Observe&Example 13Comparative Methyl ethyl ketone 3 D D ObservedExample 14Comparative sec-Butyl alcohol 3 D D ObservedExample 15Comparative tert-Butyl alcohol 3 D D ObservedExample 16Comparative 2-Methyl-3-butyne-2-ol 3 D D ObservedExample 17Comparative n-Propanol 3 D D ObservedExample 18Comparative Isopropanol 3 D D ObservedExample 19Comparative Diisopropylamine 3 D D ObservedExample 20Comparative Triethylamine 3 D D ObservedExample 21Comparative Tetrahydrofuran 3 D D ObservedExample 22Comparative Tetrahydropyran 3 D D ObservedExample 23Comparative Diisopropyl ether 3 D D ObservedExample 24Comparative Ethyl acetate 3 D D ObservedExample 25Comparative 2-Methoxy ethanol 3 D D ObservedExample 26Comparative Methylal 3 D D ObservedExample 27__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.1) Addition amount (parts by weight) based on 100 parts by weight of 1bromopropane

EXAMPLE 19

Into a 100-ml glass Erlenmeyer flask was charged 50 ml of a 1-bromopropane composition obtained by adding 0.5 parts by weight of nitromethane and 0.5 parts by weight of 1,2-butylene oxide to 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane. A piece of a metal specimen (dimension: 13 mm.times.65 mm.times.3 mm) which had been thoroughly polished and cleaned was then placed in the Erlenmeyer flask so as to extend over both the gaseous and liquid phases. With a reflux condenser attached to the top thereof, the Erlenmeyer flask was then heated over a hot water bath to the boiling temperature of the 1-bromopropane composition where it was refluxed with the specimen being in contact with both the gaseous and liquid phases. After 140 hours of refluxing, the reaction system was allowed to cool to room temperature. The specimen was then taken out from the flask to see the corrosion thereof. The liquid phase was observed for coloration. The acid content (hydrogen bromide) produced was then titrimetrically determined. The content of the stabilizer based on 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane and the test results are set forth in Table 3 and Table 4, respectively.

TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________Stabilizer composition (parts by weight).sup.1) 1,2- Tri- 1,2-Di- 2- Tri- N,N-Diiso- Methyl Nitro- Butylene methoxy- Nitro- 1,4- methoxy Methoxy- ethanol- propyl- thio-Test No. methane oxide methane ethane Dioxane ethane ethanol amine ethylamine cyanate__________________________________________________________________________Example 19 0.5 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 20 0.25 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 21 0.5 0.1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 22 0.5 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 23 0.5 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 24 1 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 25 3 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 26 3 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 27 5 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 28 0.25 -- 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 29 0.5 -- 0.1 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 30 0.5 -- 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 31 0.5 -- 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 32 0.5 -- 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 33 1 -- 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 34 3 -- 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 35 3 -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 36 5 -- 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 37 0.2 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.01Example 38 0.2 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.1Comparative -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 28Comparative 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 29Comparative -- 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 30Comparative -- -- 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 31Comparative 0.05 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 32Comparative -- 0.5 -- -- -- 0.5 -- -- -- --Example 33Comparative -- 0.5 -- -- 0.5 -- -- -- -- --Example 34Comparative 2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Example 35Comparative 2 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 -- --Example 36Comparative 2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 --Example 37Comparative -- 0.5 -- 0.5 -- -- -- -- -- --Example 38Comparative -- 0.5 -- 1 -- -- -- -- -- --Example 39Comparative -- 0.5 -- 3 -- -- -- -- -- --Example 40Comparative 0.2 0.5 -- -- 3 -- -- -- -- --Example 41Comparative -- -- -- 2 -- -- 0.5 -- -- --Example 42Comparative -- -- -- 2 -- -- -- -- 0.5 --Example 43Comparative -- -- -- 2 -- -- 0.5 -- 0.1 --Example 44__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.1) Addition amount (parts by weight) based on 100 parts by weight of 1bromopropane TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________Aluminum Zinc Iron CopperAfter Test HBr After Test HBr After Test HBr After Test Metal Test Concen- Metal Test Concen- Metal Test Concen- Metal Test HBr Speci- Solu- tration Speci- Solu- tration Speci- Solu- tration Speci- Solu- Concen-Test No. ment tion (ppm) men tion (ppm) men tion (ppm) men tion tration__________________________________________________________________________Example 19 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 20 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 21 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 22 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 23 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 24 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 25 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 26 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 27 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 28 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 29 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 30 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 31 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 32 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 33 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 34 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 35 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 36 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 37 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Example 38 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0 A A 0Comparative D D Note.sup.1) D D Note.sup.1) C B 0 C B 0Example 28Comparative B A 10 B A 10 B A 10 C B 10Example 29Comparative D D Note.sup.1) D B 34 B A 0 C B 24Example 30Comparative D D Note.sup.1) B A 0 B A 0 B A 0Example 31Comparative D D Note.sup.1) D B 10 B B 0 B B 0Example 32Comparative D D Note.sup.1) D B 10 B B 0 B B 0Example 33Comparative D D Note.sup.1) D D Note.sup.1) C B 10 C B 0Example 34Comparative A A 10 D B 34 D D Note.sup.1) C B 20Example 35Comparative C D Note.sup.2) C D Note.sup.2) C D Note.sup.2) C D Note.sup.2)Example 36Comparative C D Note.sup.2) C D Note.sup.2) C D Note.sup.2) C D Note.sup.2)Example 37Comparative D D Note.sup.1) B B 22 B B 48 B B 22Example 38Comparative B B 34 B B 34 B B 35 B B 35Example 39Comparative B B 66 B B 100 B B 83 B B >100Example 40Comparative B B 30 D B 10 C C 10 C C 10Example 41Comparative C A 0 D B 0 D D >100 D D Note.sup.1)Example 42Comparative D A 0 D B 0 D D 20 D D Note.sup.1)Example 43Comparative A A 0 D B 0 D B 20 D D Note.sup.1)Example 44__________________________________________________________________________ Note .sup.1) : Acid content was immeasurable due to marked deterioration of the test solution. Note .sup.2) : Test was suspended due to formation of precipitation in th test solution.

The material of the metal specimens used were as follows:

Aluminum specimen: JIS A1100P Zinc specimen: JIS Second-Grade (for flat board) Iron specimen: JIS cold-pressed steel plate SPCC Copper specimen: JIS First-Grade copper plate (ordinary class)

The criterion for evaluation of the external appearance of the metal specimen and the coloration of the test solution are as follows:

Criterion for evaluation of metal specimen A: No change observed B: Tarnish observed slightly on some area C: Tarnish observed on the entire area D: Definite discoloration or corrosion observed on the entire area Criterion for evaluation of test solution A: Colorless and transparent B: Slightly colored C: Definite coloration observed D: Marked coloration observed

EXAMPLES 20-38 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 28-44

The procedure of Example 19 was followed to examine a 1-bromopropane composition except that the composition and addition amount of the stabilizer according to the present invention were changed. The content of the stabilizer based on 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane is set forth in Table 3 and the test results are set forth in Table 4.

Tables 3 and 4 show that the 1-bromopropane compositions of the present invention exhibit a sufficient stability against aluminum, zinc, iron and copper. On the contrary, the stabilizer combinations of the Comparative Examples, though exerting a stabilization effect with respect to a certain kind of metal, exert an insufficient stabilization effect with respect to other metals.

While the invention has been described in detail and with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.

Claims

1. A stabilized 1-bromopropane composition, consisting of 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane, from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of nitromethane, and from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of 1,2-butylene oxide or trimethoxymethane, and optionally a stabilizer selected from the group consisting of saturated alcohols, unsaturated alcohols, phenols and thiocyanic esters.

2. The stabilized 1-bromopropane composition of claim 1, which consists of 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane, from 0.1 to 1 part by weight of nitromethane and from 0.1 to 1 part by weight of 1,2-butylene oxide or trimethoxymethane, and optionally a stabilizer selected from the group consisting of saturated alcohols, unsaturated alcohols, phenols and thiocyanic esters.

3. The stabilized 1-bromopropane composition of claim 1, which consists of 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane, from 0.1 to 1 part by weight of nitromethane and from 0.1 to 1 part by weight of 1,2-butylene oxide, and optionally a stabilizer selected from the group consisting of saturated alcohols, unsaturated alcohols, phenols and thiocyanic esters.

4. The stabilized 1-bromopropane composition of claim 1, consisting of 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane, from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of nitromethane and from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of 1,2-butylene oxide, and optionally a stabilizer selected from the group consisting of saturated alcohols, unsaturated alcohols, phenols and thiocyanic esters.

5. The stabilized 1-bromopropane composition of claim 1, consisting of 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane, from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of nitromethane, and from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of trimethoxymethane, and optionally a stabilizer selected from the group consisting of saturated alcohols, unsaturated alcohols, phenols and thiocyanic esters.

6. The stabilized 1-bromopropane composition of claim 1, which consists of 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane, from 0.1 to 1 part by weight of nitromethane and from 0.1 to 1 part by weight of trimethoxymethane, and optionally a stabilizer selected from the croup consisting of saturated alcohols, unsaturated alcohols, phenols and thiocyanic esters.

7. A method for improving the stability of 1-bromopropane which consists of adding to 1-bromopropane a stabilizer consisting of from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of nitromethane and from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of 1,2-butylene oxide or trimethoxymethane, based on 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane, and optionally a stabilizer selected from the group consisting of saturated alcohols, unsaturated alcohols, phenols and thiocyanic esters.

8. The method for improving the stability of 1-bromopropane of claim 7 which consists of adding to 1-bromopropane a stabilizer consisting of from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of nitromethane and from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of 1,2-butylene oxide, based on 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane, and optionally a stabilizer selected from the group consisting of saturated alcohols, unsaturated alcohols, phenols and thiocyanic esters.

9. The method for improving the stability of 1-bromopropane of claim 7 which consists of adding to 1-bromopropane a stabilizer consisting of from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of nitromethane and from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of trimethoxymethane, based on 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane, and optionally a stabilizer selected from the group consisting of saturated alcohols, unsaturated alcohols, phenols and thiocyanic esters.

10. The method for improving the stability of 1-bromopropane of claim 7 which consists of adding to 1-bromopropane a stabilizer consisting of from 0.1 to 1 parts by weight of nitromethane and from 0.1 to 1 parts by weight of 1,2-butylene oxide or trimethoxymethane, based on 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane, and optionally a stabilizer selected from the group consisting of saturated alcohols, unsaturated alcohols, phenols and thiocygnic esters.

11. The method for improving the stability of 1-bromopropane of claim 7 which consists of adding to 1-bromopropane a stabilizer consisting of from 0.1 to 1 parts by weight of nitromethane and from 0.1 to 1 parts by weight of 1,2-butylene oxide, based on 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane, and optionally a stabilizer selected from the group consisting of saturated alcohols, unsaturated alcohols, phenols and thiocyanic esters.

12. The method for improving the stability of 1-bromopropane of claim 7 which consists of adding to 1-bromopropane a stabilizer consisting of from 0.1 to 1 parts by weight of nitromethane and from 0.1 to 1 parts by weight of trimethoxymethane, based on 100 parts by weight of 1-bromopropane, and optionally a stabilizer selected from the group consisting of saturated alcohols, unsaturated alcohols, phenols and thiocyanic esters.