Stabilized formulations containing anti-interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) antibodies

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12077593
  • Patent Number
    12,077,593
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, April 8, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 3, 2024
    3 months ago
Abstract
The present invention provides pharmaceutical formulations comprising a human antibody that specifically binds to human interleukin-6 receptor (hIL-6R). The formulations may contain, in addition to an anti-hIL-6R antibody, at least one amino acid, at least one sugar, and/or at least one non-ionic surfactant. The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention exhibit a substantial degree of antibody stability after storage for several months.
Description
REFERENCE TO A SEQUENCE LISTING

This application includes an electronic sequence listing in a file named “6013US04-Sequence.txt”, created on Apr. 8, 2021 and containing 37,549 bytes, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of therapeutic antibody formulations. More specifically, the present invention relates to the field of pharmaceutical formulations comprising a human antibody that specifically binds to human interleukin-6 receptor.


BACKGROUND

Therapeutic macromolecules (e.g., antibodies) must be formulated in a manner that not only makes the molecules suitable for administration to patients, but also maintains their stability during storage. For example, therapeutic antibodies in liquid solution are prone to degradation, aggregation and/or undesired chemical modifications unless the solution is formulated properly. The stability of an antibody in liquid formulation depends not only on the kinds of excipients used in the formulation, but also on the amounts and proportions of the excipients relative to one another. Furthermore, other considerations aside from stability must be taken into account when preparing a liquid antibody formulation. Examples of such additional considerations include the viscosity of the solution and the concentration of antibody that can be accommodated by a given formulation. Thus, when formulating a therapeutic antibody, great care must be taken to arrive at a formulation that remains stable, contains an adequate concentration of antibody, and possesses a suitable viscosity as well as other properties which enable the formulation to be conveniently administered to patients.


Antibodies to the human interleukin-6 receptor (hIL-6R) are one example of a therapeutically relevant macromolecule that requires proper formulation. Anti-hIL-6R antibodies are clinically useful for the treatment and/or prevention of diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and other conditions. Exemplary anti-IL-6R antibodies are described, inter alia, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,582,298; 6,410,691; 5,817,790; 5,795,695; and 6,670,373. A particularly important anti-hIL-6R antibody with great therapeutic potential is the antibody referred to in U.S. Pat. No. 7,582,298 as VQ8F11-21 (also referred to herein as “mAb1”).


Although anti-hIL-6R antibodies are known, there remains a need in the art for novel pharmaceutical formulations comprising anti-hIL-6R antibodies which are sufficiently stable and also suitable for administration to patients.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention satisfies the aforementioned need by providing pharmaceutical formulations comprising a human antibody that specifically binds to human interleukin-6 receptor (hIL-6R). The formulations of the invention may comprise excipients in addition to the anti-hIL-6R antibody. For example, in certain embodiments, the formulation may comprise (i) a human antibody that specifically binds to hIL-6R; (ii) at least one amino acid; and (iii) at least one carbohydrate. The amino acid can be, e.g., histidine and/or arginine. The carbohydrate can be a sugar such as, e.g., sucrose, glucose, mannitol, lactose or trehalose.


According to certain embodiments of the present invention, the formulation further comprises a non-ionic surfactant. The non-ionic surfactant can be, e.g., polysorbate 20, polysorbate 80, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, polyethylene glycol, etc.


The antibody contained within the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention can be any antibody which specifically binds to hIL-6R. Exemplary antibodies that may be contained within the formulations of the invention are antibodies comprising a heavy chain variable region (HCVR) and a light chain variable region (LCVR), wherein the HCVR comprises a heavy chain complementary determining region (HCDR) 1 having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 20, a HCDR2 having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:22, and a HCDR3 having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:24; and wherein the LCVR comprises a light chain complementary determining region (LCDR) 1 having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 28, a LCDR2 having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:30, and a LCDR3 having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:32. In certain embodiments, the antibody contained within the formulations of the present invention are antibodies comprising a HCVR having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 18 and a LCVR having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:26.


The antibody formulations of the present invention may be contained within any suitable container useful for storing pharmaceutical formulations. Examples of such suitable containers include, e.g., glass or plastic vials, syringes and cartridges. The container may be clear or opaque (e.g., amber colored).


According to certain aspects of the present invention, the pharmaceutical formulations remain relatively stable following storage for several days, months or years at a given temperature. For example, in certain exemplary embodiments of the present invention, a high percentage of the antibody (e.g., 90%, 95%, 96% or more) is maintained in its native form following at least 3, 6, 9 or more months of storage. The percentage of native form of the antibody may be measured, e.g., by SE-HPLC, or by any other method known in the art. The storage temperature at which stability of the antibody is maintained can be, e.g., −80° C., −40° C., −20° C., 0° C., 5° C., 25° C., 45° C., or higher.


Other embodiments of the present invention will become apparent from a review of the ensuing detailed description.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 shows the percent of native mAb1 remaining, as measured by SE-HPLC, following various amounts of time of storage at −20° C. (filled triangles), −30° C. (filled squares), and −80° C. (filled diamonds).



FIG. 2 shows the percent of acidic species of mAb1, as measured by CEX-HPLC, following various amounts of time of storage at −20° C. (filled triangles), −30° C. (filled squares), and −80° C. (filled diamonds).



FIG. 3 shows the percent of native mAb1 remaining in various minimal excipient formulations, as measured by SE-HPLC, following various amounts of time of storage at −30° C. Filled diamonds represent formulation 1 (80 mg/ml mAb1, 0.13% polysorbate 20, 6% sucrose, 10 mM histidine); filled squares represent formulation 2 (80 mg/mL mAb1, 0.13% polysorbate 20, 10 mM histidine); filled triangles represent formulation 3 (80 mg/ml mAb, 1% sucrose, 10 mM histidine); open squares represent formulation 4 (80 mg/ml mAb1, 2% sucrose, 10 mM histidine); asterisks represent formulation 5 (80 mg/mL mAb1, 4% sucrose, 10 mM histidine); filled circles represent formulation 6 (80 mg/ml mAb1, 6% sucrose, 10 mM histidine); crosses represent formulation 7 (80 mg/mL antibody, 10 mM histidine); and open circles represent formulation 8 (65 mg/mL antibody, 10 mM histidine). All formulations are set out in Table 6 (see Example 2, below).



FIG. 4 shows the percent of native mAb1 remaining in various minimal excipient formulations, as measured by SE-HPLC, following various amounts of time of storage at −20° C. Filled diamonds represent formulation 1 (80 mg/ml mAb1, 0.13% polysorbate 20, 6% sucrose, 10 mM histidine); filled squares represent formulation 2 (80 mg/ml mAb1, 0.13% polysorbate 20, 10 mM histidine); filled triangles represent formulation 3 (80 mg/ml mAb, 1% sucrose, 10 mM histidine); open squares represent formulation 4 (80 mg/ml mAb1, 2% sucrose, 10 mM histidine); asterisks represent formulation 5 (80 mg/ml mAb1, 4% sucrose, 10 mM histidine); filled circles represent formulation 6 (80 mg/ml mAb1, 6% sucrose, 10 mM histidine); crosses represent formulation 7 (80 mg/mL antibody, 10 mM histidine); and open circles represent formulation 8 (65 mg/mL antibody, 10 mM histidine). All formulations are set out in Table 6 (see Example 2, below).





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Before the present invention is described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to particular methods and experimental conditions described, as such methods and conditions may vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting, since the scope of the present invention will be limited only by the appended claims.


Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. As used herein, the term “about,” when used in reference to a particular recited numerical value, means that the value may vary from the recited value by no more than 1%. For example, as used herein, the expression “about 100” includes 99 and 101 and all values in between (e.g., 99.1, 99.2, 99.3, 99.4, etc.).


Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, the preferred methods and materials are now described. All publications mentioned herein are incorporated herein by reference to describe in their entirety.


Pharmaceutical Formulations


As used herein, the expression “pharmaceutical formulation” means a combination of at least one active ingredient (e.g., a small molecule, macromolecule, compound, etc. which is capable of exerting a biological effect in a human or non-human animal), and at least one inactive ingredient which, when combined with the active ingredient and/or one or more additional inactive ingredients, is suitable for therapeutic administration to a human or non-human animal. The term “formulation,” as used herein, means “pharmaceutical formulation” unless specifically indicated otherwise. The present invention provides pharmaceutical formulations comprising at least one therapeutic polypeptide. According to certain embodiments of the present invention, the therapeutic polypeptide is an antibody that binds specifically to human interleukin-6 receptor (hIL-6R) or an antigen-binding fragment thereof. More specifically, the present invention includes pharmaceutical formulations that comprise: (i) a human antibody that specifically binds to hIL-6R; (ii) histidine; and (iii) a carbohydrate. Additional components may be included in the formulations of the present invention such as, e.g., at least one non-ionic surfactant, and at least one additional amino acid. Specific exemplary components and formulations included within the present invention are described in detail below.


The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention may, in certain embodiments, be fluid formulations. As used herein, the expression “fluid formulation” means a mixture of at least two components that exists predominantly in the fluid state at about 5° C. to about 45° C. Fluid formulations include, inter alia, liquid formulations. Fluid formulations may be of low, moderate or high viscosity depending on their particular constituents.


Antibodies that Bind Specifically to hIL-6R


The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention may comprise a human antibody, or an antigen-binding fragment thereof, that binds specifically to hIL-6R. As used herein, the term “hIL-6R” means a human cytokine receptor that specifically binds interleukin-6 (IL-6). In certain embodiments, the antibody contained within the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention binds specifically to the extracellular domain of hIL-6R. The extracellular domain of hIL-6R is represented by the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:74.


The term “antibody”, as used herein, is generally intended to refer to immunoglobulin molecules comprising four polypeptide chains, two heavy (H) chains and two light (L) chains inter-connected by disulfide bonds, as well as multimers thereof (e.g., IgM); however, immunoglobulin molecules consisting of only heavy chains (i.e., lacking light chains) are also encompassed within the definition of the term “antibody.” Each heavy chain comprises a heavy chain variable region (abbreviated herein as HCVR or VH) and a heavy chain constant region. The heavy chain constant region comprises three domains, CH1, CH2 and CH3. Each light chain comprises a light chain variable region (abbreviated herein as LCVR or VL) and a light chain constant region. The light chain constant region comprises one domain (CL1). The VH and VL regions can be further subdivided into regions of hypervariability, termed complementary determining regions (CDRs), interspersed with regions that are more conserved, termed framework regions (FR). Each VH and VL is composed of three CDRs and four FRs, arranged from amino-terminus to carboxy-terminus in the following order: FR1, CDR1, FR2, CDR2, FR3, CDR3, FR4.


Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the term “antibody,” as used herein, shall be understood to encompass complete antibody molecules as well as antigen-binding fragments thereof. The term “antigen-binding portion” or “antigen-binding fragment” of an antibody (or simply “antibody portion” or “antibody fragment”), as used herein, refers to one or more fragments of an antibody that retain the ability to specifically bind to hIL-6R.


An “isolated antibody”, as used herein, is intended to refer to an antibody that is substantially free of other antibodies having different antigenic specificities (e.g., an isolated antibody that specifically binds hIL-6R is substantially free of antibodies that specifically bind antigens other than hIL-6R).


The term “specifically binds,” or the like, means that an antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof forms a complex with an antigen that is relatively stable under physiologic conditions. Specific binding can be characterized by a dissociation constant of at least about 1×10−6 M or greater. Methods for determining whether two molecules specifically bind are well known in the art and include, for example, equilibrium dialysis, surface plasmon resonance, and the like. An isolated antibody that specifically binds hIL-6R may, however, have cross-reactivity to other antigens, such as IL-6R molecules from other species. In the context of the present invention, multispecific (e.g., bispecific) antibodies that bind to hIL-6R as well as one or more additional antigens are deemed to “specifically bind” hIL-6R. Moreover, an isolated antibody may be substantially free of other cellular material and/or chemicals.


Exemplary anti-hIL-6R antibodies that may be included in the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention are set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 7,582,298, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.


According to certain embodiments of the present invention, the anti-hIL-6R antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, comprises a heavy chain complementary determining region (HCDR) 1 having an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 4, 20, 36 and 52; a HCDR2 having an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:6, 22, 38 and 54; and a HCDR3 having an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:2, 18, 34 and 50. In certain embodiments, the anti-hIL-6R antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, comprises HCDR1-HCDR2-HCDR3 domains, respectively, selected from the group consisting of: (i) SEQ ID NOs:4-6-8; (ii) SEQ ID NOs:20-22-24; (iii) SEQ ID NOs:36-38-40; and (iv) SEQ ID NOs:52-54-56.


According to certain embodiments of the present invention, the anti-hIL-6R antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, comprises a light chain complementary determining region (LCDR) 1 having an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 12, 28, 44 and 60; a LCDR2 having an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 14, 30, 46 and 62; and a LCDR3 having an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 16, 32, 48 and 64. In certain embodiments, the anti-hIL-6R antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, comprises LCDR1-LCDR2-LCDR3 domains, respectively, selected from the group consisting of: (i) SEQ ID NOs: 12-14-16; (ii) SEQ ID NOs:28-30-32; (iii) SEQ ID NOs:44-46-48; and (iv) SEQ ID NOs:60-62-64.


In certain embodiments, the anti-hIL-6R antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, comprises HCDR1-HCDR2-HCDR3/LCDR1-LCDR2-LCDR3 domains, respectively, selected from the group consisting of: (i) SEQ ID NOs:4-6-8/SEQ ID NOs: 12-14-16; (ii) SEQ ID NOs:20-22-24/SEQ ID NOs:28-30-32; (iii) SEQ ID NOs:36-38-40/SEQ ID NOs:44 46-48; and (iv) SEQ ID NOs:52-54-56/SEQ ID NOs:60-62-64.


In certain embodiments, the anti-hIL-6R antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, comprises a heavy chain variable region (HCVR) having an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:2, 18, 34 and 50. In certain embodiments, the anti-hIL-6R antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, comprises a light chain variable region (LCVR) having an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 10, 26, 42 and 58. In certain embodiments, the anti-hIL-6R antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, comprises a HCVR/LCVR amino acid sequence pair selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:2/10; 18/26; 34/42 and 50/58.


The non-limiting, exemplary antibody used in the Examples herein is referred to as “mAb1.” This antibody is also referred to in U.S. Pat. No. 7,582,298 as VQ8F11-21. mAb1 (VQ8F11-21) comprises an HCVR/LCVR amino acid sequence pair having SEQ ID NOs: 18/26, and HCDR1-HCDR2-HCDR3/LCDR1-LCDR2-LCDR3 domains represented by SEQ ID NOs:20-22-24/SEQ ID NOs:28-30-32.


The amount of antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, contained within the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention may vary depending on the specific properties desired of the formulations, as well as the particular circumstances and purposes for which the formulations are intended to be used. In certain embodiments, the pharmaceutical formulations may contain about 1 mg/mL to about 500 mg/mL of antibody; about 5 mg/mL to about 400 mg/ml of antibody; about 5 mg/mL to about 200 mg/mL of antibody; about 25 mg/mL to about 180 mg/ml of antibody; about 25 mg/mL to about 150 mg/mL of antibody; or about 50 mg/mL to about 180 mg/ml of antibody. For example, the formulations of the present invention may comprise about 1 mg/mL; about 2 mg/mL; about 5 mg/ml; about 10 mg/ml; about 15 mg/ml; about 20 mg/mL; about 25 mg/mL; about 30 mg/mL; about 35 mg/mL; about 40 mg/mL; about 45 mg/ml; about 50 mg/mL; about 55 mg/ml; about 60 mg/ml; about 65 mg/mL; about 70 mg/mL; about 75 mg/ml; about 80 mg/mL; about 85 mg/mL; about 86 mg/ml; about 87 mg/ml; about 88 mg/mL; about 89 mg/ml; about 90 mg/mL; about 95 mg/ml; about 100 mg/mL; about 105 mg/mL; about 110 mg/mL; about 115 mg/mL; about 120 mg/mL; about 125 mg/mL; about 130 mg/mL; about 131 mg/mL; about 132 mg/mL; about 133 mg/mL; about 134 mg/ml; about 135 mg/mL; about 140 mg/mL; about 145 mg/ml; about 150 mg/ml; about 155 mg/ml; about 160 mg/mL; about 165 mg/mL; about 170 mg/mL; about 175 mg/ml; about 180 mg/mL; about 185 mg/mL; about 190 mg/mL; about 195 mg/mL; or about 200 mg/ml of an antibody or an antigen-binding fragment thereof, that binds specifically to hIL-6R.


Excipients and pH


The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention comprise one or more excipients. The term “excipient,” as used herein, means any non-therapeutic agent added to the formulation to provide a desired consistency, viscosity or stabilizing effect.


In certain embodiments, the pharmaceutical formulation of the invention comprises at least one amino acid. Exemplary amino acids suitable for use in the formulations of the present invention include, inter alia, arginine and/or histidine.


The amount of amino acid contained within the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention may vary depending on the specific properties desired of the formulations, as well as the particular circumstances and purposes for which the formulations are intended to be used. In certain embodiments, the formulations may contain about 1 mM to about 200 mM of an amino acid; about 2 mM to about 100 mM of an amino acid; about 5 mM to about 50 mM of an amino acid; or about 10 mM to about 25 mM of an amino acid. For example, the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention may comprise about 1 mM; about 1.5 mM; about 2 mM; about 2.5 mM; about 3 mM; about 3.5 mM; about 4 mM; about 4.5 mM; about 5 mM; about 5.5 mM; about 6 mM; about 6.5 mM; about 7 mM; about 7.5 mM; about 8 mM; about 8.5 mM; about 9 mM; about 9.5 mM; about 10 mM; about 10.5 mM; about 11 mM; about 11.5 mM; about 12 mM; about 12.5 mM; about 13 mM; about 13.5 mM; about 14 mM; about 14.5 mM; about 15 mM; about 15.5 mM; 16 mM; about 16.5 mM; about 17 mM; about 17.5 mM; about 18 mM; about 18.5 mM; about 19 mM; about 19.5 mM; about 20 mM; about 20.5 mM; about 21 mM; about 21.5 mM; about 22 mM; about 22.5 mM; about 23 mM; about 23.5 mM; about 24 mM; about 24.5 mM; about 25 mM; about 25.5 mM; about 26 mM; about 26.5 mM; about 27 mM; about 27.5 mM; about 28 mM; about 28.5 mM; about 29 mM; about 29.5 mM; about 30 mM; about 35 mM; about 40 mM; about 45 mM; or about 50 mM of an amino acid (e.g., histidine and/or arginine).


The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention may also comprise one or more carbohydrate, e.g., one or more sugar. The sugar can be a reducing sugar or a non-reducing sugar. “Reducing sugars” include, e.g., sugars with a ketone or aldehyde group and contain a reactive hemiacetal group, which allows the sugar to act as a reducing agent. Specific examples of reducing sugars include fructose, glucose, glyceraldehyde, lactose, arabinose, mannose, xylose, ribose, rhamnose, galactose and maltose. Non-reducing sugars can comprise an anomeric carbon that is an acetal and is not substantially reactive with amino acids or polypeptides to initiate a Maillard reaction. Specific examples of non-reducing sugars include sucrose, trehalose, sorbose, sucralose, melezitose and raffinose. Sugar acids include, for example, saccharic acids, gluconate and other polyhydroxy sugars and salts thereof.


The amount of sugar contained within the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention will vary depending on the specific circumstances and intended purposes for which the formulations are used. In certain embodiments, the formulations may contain about 0.1% to about 20% sugar; about 0.5% to about 20% sugar; about 1% to about 20% sugar; about 2% to about 15% sugar; about 3% to about 10% sugar; about 4% to about 10% sugar; or about 5% to about 10% sugar. For example, the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention may comprise about 0.5%; about 1.0%; about 1.5%; about 2.0%; about 2.5%; about 3.0%; about 3.5%; about 4.0%; about 4.5%; about 5.0%; about 5.5%; about 6.0%; 6.5%; about 7.0%; about 7.5%; about 8.0%; about 8.5%; about 9.0%; about 9.5%; about 10.0%; about 10.5%; about 11.0%; about 11.5%; about 12.0%; about 12.5%; about 13.0%; about 13.5%; about 14.0%; about 14.5%; about 15.0%; about 15.5%; about 16.0%; 16.5%; about 17.0%; about 17.5%; about 18.0%; about 18.5%; about 19.0%; about 19.5%; or about 20.0% sugar (e.g., sucrose).


The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention may also comprise one or more surfactant. As used herein, the term “surfactant” means a substance which reduces the surface tension of a fluid in which it is dissolved and/or reduces the interfacial tension between oil and water. Surfactants can be ionic or non-ionic. Exemplary non-ionic surfactants that can be included in the formulations of the present invention include, e.g., alkyl poly(ethylene oxide), alkyl polyglucosides (e.g., octyl glucoside and decyl maltoside), fatty alcohols such as cetyl alcohol and oleyl alcohol, cocamide MEA, cocamide DEA, and cocamide TEA. Specific non-ionic surfactants that can be included in the formulations of the present invention include, e.g., polysorbates such as polysorbate 20, polysorbate 28, polysorbate 40, polysorbate 60, polysorbate 65, polysorbate 80, polysorbate 81, and polysorbate 85; poloxamers such as poloxamer 188, poloxamer 407; polyethylene-polypropylene glycol; or polyethylene glycol (PEG). Polysorbate 20 is also known as TWEEN 20, sorbitan monolaurate and polyoxyethylenesorbitan monolaurate.


The amount of surfactant contained within the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention may vary depending on the specific properties desired of the formulations, as well as the particular circumstances and purposes for which the formulations are intended to be used. In certain embodiments, the formulations may contain about 0.05% to about 5% surfactant; or about 0.1% to about 0.2% surfactant. For example, the formulations of the present invention may comprise about 0.05%; about 0.06%; about 0.07%; about 0.08%; about 0.09%; about 0.10%; about 0.11%; about 0.12%; about 0.13%; about 0.14%; about 0.15%; about 0.16%; about 0.17%; about 0.18%; about 0.19%; about 0.20%; about 0.21%; about 0.22%; about 0.23%; about 0.24%; about 0.25%; about 0.26%; about 0.27%; about 0.28%; about 0.29%; or about 0.30% surfactant (e.g., polysorbate 20).


The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention may have a pH of from about 5.0 to about 8.0. For example, the formulations of the present invention may have a pH of about 5.0; about 5.2; about 5.4; about 5.6; about 5.8; about 6.0; about 6.2; about 6.4; about 6.6; about 6.8; about 7.0; about 7.2; about 7.4; about 7.6; about 7.8; or about 8.0.


Exemplary Formulations


According to one aspect of the present invention, the pharmaceutical formulation comprises: (i) a human antibody that specifically binds to hIL-6R (e.g., mAb1); (ii) an amino acid (e.g., histidine); and (iii) a sugar (e.g., sucrose). Specific, non-limiting exemplary embodiments encompassed by this aspect of the invention are set forth in Table 1.









TABLE 1







Exemplary Pharmaceutical Formulations


Comprising mAb1, Histidine and Sucrose









mAb1 (mg/ml)
























25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150


























histidine
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10


(mM)


















sucrose
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
6
6
6
6


(%)









According to another aspect of the present invention, the pharmaceutical formulation comprises: (i) a human antibody that specifically binds to hIL-6R (e.g., mAb1); (ii) an amino acid (e.g., histidine); (iii) a sugar (e.g., sucrose); and (iv) a surfactant (e.g., polysorbate 20). Specific, non-limiting exemplary embodiments encompassed by this aspect of the invention are set forth in Tables 2A and 2B.









TABLE 2A







Exemplary Pharmaceutical Formulations Comprising


mAb1, Histidine, Sucrose and Polysorbate 20









mAb1 (mg/ml)




















25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150






















histidine
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10


(mM)














sucrose
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10


(%)














polysorbate
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1


20 (%)
















TABLE 2B







Exemplary Pharmaceutical Formulations Comprising


mAb1, Histidine, Sucrose and Polysorbate 20









mAb1 (mg/ml)




















25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150






















histidine
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10


(mM)














sucrose
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10


(%)














polysorbate
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


20 (%)









According to another aspect of the present invention, the pharmaceutical formulation comprises: (i) a human antibody that specifically binds to hIL-6R (e.g., mAb1); (ii) a first amino acid (e.g., histidine); (iii) a sugar (e.g., sucrose); (iv) a surfactant (e.g., polysorbate 20); and (v) a second amino acid (e.g., arginine). Specific, non-limiting exemplary embodiments encompassed by this aspect of the invention are set forth in Tables 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E and 3F.









TABLE 3A







Exemplary Pharmaceutical Formulations Comprising


mAb1, Histidine, Sucrose, Polysorbate 20 and Arginine









mAb1 (mg/ml)




















25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150






















histidine
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10


(mM)














sucrose
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10


(%)














polysorbate
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


20 (%)














arginine
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10


(mM)
















TABLE 3B







Exemplary Pharmaceutical Formulations Comprising


mAb1, Histidine, Sucrose, Polysorbate 20 and Arginine









mAb1 (mg/ml)




















25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150






















histidine
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10


(mM)














sucrose
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10


(%)














polysorbate
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


20 (%)














arginine
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25


(mM)
















TABLE 3C







Exemplary Pharmaceutical Formulations Comprising


mAb1, Histidine, Sucrose, Polysorbate 20 and Arginine









mAb1 (mg/ml)




















25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150






















histidine
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25


(mM)














sucrose
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10


(%)














polysorbate
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


20 (%)














arginine
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10


(mM)
















TABLE 3D







Exemplary Pharmaceutical Formulations Comprising


mAb1, Histidine, Sucrose, Polysorbate 20 and Arginine









mAb1 (mg/ml)




















25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150






















histidine
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25


(mM)














sucrose
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10


(%)














polysorbate
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


20 (%)














arginine
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25


(mM)
















TABLE 3E







Exemplary Pharmaceutical Formulations Comprising


mAb1, Histidine, Sucrose, Polysorbate 20 and Arginine









mAb1 (mg/ml)




















25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150
25
50
100
150






















histidine
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25


(mM)














sucrose
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10


(%)














polysorbate
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


20 (%)














arginine
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50


(mM)
















TABLE 3F







Exemplary Pharmaceutical Formulations Comprising


mAb1, Histidine, Sucrose, Polysorbate 20 and Arginine









mAb1 (mg/ml)




















160
170
175
180
160
170
175
180
160
170
175
180






















histidine
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25


(mM)














sucrose
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10


(%)














polysorbate
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


20 (%)














arginine
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50


(mM)









Additional non-limiting examples of pharmaceutical formulations encompassed by the present invention are set forth elsewhere herein, including the working Examples presented below.


Stability and Viscosity of the Pharmaceutical Formulations


The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention typically exhibit high levels of stability. The term “stable,” as used herein in reference to the pharmaceutical formulations, means that the antibodies within the pharmaceutical formulations retain an acceptable degree of structure and/or function and/or biological activity after storage for a defined amount of time. A formulation may be stable even though the antibody contained therein does not maintain 100% of its structure and/or function and/or biological activity after storage for a defined amount of time. Under certain circumstances, maintenance of about 80%, about 85%, about 90%, about 95%, about 96%, about 97%, about 98% or about 99% of an antibody's structure and/or function and/or biological activity after storage for a defined amount of time may be regarded as “stable.”


Stability can be measured, inter alia, by determining the percentage of native antibody remaining in the formulation after storage for a defined amount of time at a given temperature. The percentage of native antibody can be determined by, inter alia, size exclusion chromatography (e.g., size exclusion high performance liquid chromatography [SE-HPLC]). An “acceptable degree of stability,” as that phrase is used herein, means that at least 90% of the native form of the antibody can be detected in the formulation after storage for a defined amount of time at a given temperature. In certain embodiments, at least about 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% of the native form of the antibody can be detected in the formulation after storage for a defined amount of time at a given temperature. The defined amount of time after which stability is measured can be at least 1 month, at least 2 months, at least 3 months, at least 4 months, at least 5 months, at least 6 months, at least 7 months, at least 8 months, at least 9 months, at least 10 months, at least 11 months, at least 12 months, at least 18 months, at least 24 months, or more. The temperature at which the pharmaceutical formulation may be stored when assessing stability can be any temperature from about −80° C. to about 45° C., e.g., storage at about −30° C., about −20° C., about 0° C., about 5° C., about 25° C., or about 45° C. For example, a pharmaceutical formulation may be deemed stable if after 3 months of storage at 5° C., greater than about 90%, 95%, 96% or 97% of native antibody is detected by SE-HPLC. A pharmaceutical formulation may also be deemed stable if after 6 months of storage at 5° C., greater than about 90%, 95%, 96% or 97% of native antibody is detected by SE-HPLC. A pharmaceutical formulation may also be deemed stable if after 9 months of storage at 5° C., greater than about 90%, 95%, 96% or 97% of native antibody is detected by SE-HPLC. A pharmaceutical formulation may also be deemed stable if after 3 months of storage at 25° C., greater than about 90%, 95%, 96% or 97% of native antibody is detected by SE-HPLC. A pharmaceutical formulation may also be deemed stable if after 6 months of storage at 25° C., greater than about 90%, 95%, 96% or 97% of native antibody is detected by SE-HPLC. A pharmaceutical formulation may also be deemed stable if after 9 months of storage at 25° C., greater than about 90%, 95%, 96% or 97% of native antibody is detected by SE-HPLC.


Other methods may be used to assess the stability of the formulations of the present invention such as, e.g., differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to determine thermal stability, controlled agitation to determine mechanical stability, and absorbance at about 350 nm or about 405 nm to determine solution turbidities. For example, a formulation of the present invention may be considered stable if, after 6 or more months of storage at about 5° C. to about 25° C., the change in OD405 of the formulation is less than about 0.05 (e.g., 0.04, 0.03, 0.02, 0.01, or less) from the OD405 of the formulation at t=0.


Stability may also be assessed by measuring the biological activity and/or binding affinity of the antibody to its target. For example, a formulation of the present invention may be regarded as stable if, after storage at e.g., 5° C., 25° C., 45° C., etc. for a defined amount of time (e.g., 1 to 12 months), the anti-IL-6R antibody contained within the formulation binds to IL-6R with an affinity that is at least 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, or more of the binding affinity of the antibody prior to said storage. Additional methods for assessing the stability of an antibody in formulation are demonstrated in the Examples presented below.


In the fluid form, the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention may, in certain embodiments, exhibit low to moderate levels of viscosity. “Viscosity” as used herein may be “kinematic viscosity” or “absolute viscosity.” “Kinematic viscosity” is a measure of the resistive flow of a fluid under the influence of gravity. When two fluids of equal volume are placed in identical capillary viscometers and allowed to flow by gravity, a viscous fluid takes longer than a less viscous fluid to flow through the capillary. For example, if one fluid takes 200 seconds to complete its flow and another fluid takes 400 seconds, the second fluid is twice as viscous as the first on a kinematic viscosity scale. “Absolute viscosity”, sometimes called dynamic or simple viscosity, is the product of kinematic viscosity and fluid density (Absolute Viscosity=Kinematic Viscosity×Density). The dimension of kinematic viscosity is L2/T where L is a length and T is a time. Commonly, kinematic viscosity is expressed in centistokes (cSt). The SI unit of kinematic viscosity is mm2/s, which is 1 cSt. Absolute viscosity is expressed in units of centipoise (cP). The SI unit of absolute viscosity is the milliPascal-second (mPa-s), where 1 cP=1 mPa-s.


As used herein, a low level of viscosity, in reference to a fluid formulation of the present invention, will exhibit an absolute viscosity of less than about 20 cPoise (cP). For example, a fluid formulation of the invention will be deemed to have “low viscosity,” if, when measured using standard viscosity measurement techniques, the formulation exhibits an absolute viscosity of about 19 cP, about 18 cP, about 17 cP, about 16 cP, about 15 cP, about 14 cP, about 13 cP, about 12 cP, about 11 cP, about 10 cP, about 9 cP, about 8 cP, about 7 cP, about 6 cP, about 5 cP, about 4 cP, or less. As used herein, a moderate level of viscosity, in reference to a fluid formulation of the present invention, will exhibit an absolute viscosity of between about 30 cP and about 20 cP. For example, a fluid formulation of the invention will be deemed to have “moderate viscosity,” if when measured using standard viscosity measurement techniques, the formulation exhibits an absolute viscosity of about 30 cP, about 29 cP, about 28 cP, about 27 cP, about 26 cP, about 25 cP, about 24 cP, about 23 cP, about 22 cP, about 21 cP or about 20 cP.


As illustrated in Example 6 below, the present inventors have made the surprising discovery that low to moderate viscosity fluid formulations comprising high concentrations of an anti-hIL-6R antibody (e.g., up to at least 175 mg/mL) can be obtained by formulating the antibody with 25 mM to 100 mM histidine and 25 mM to 50 mM arginine. In addition, it was further discovered that the viscosity of the formulation could be decreased to an even greater extent by adjusting the sucrose content to less than 10%.


Containers for the Pharmaceutical Formulations and Methods of Administration


The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention may be contained within any container suitable for storage of medicines and other therapeutic compositions. For example, the pharmaceutical formulations may be contained within a sealed and sterilized plastic or glass container having a defined volume such as a vial, ampule, syringe, cartridge, or bottle. Different types of vials can be used to contain the formulations of the present invention including, e.g., clear and opaque (e.g., amber) glass or plastic vials. Likewise, any type of syringe can be used to contain and/or administer the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention.


The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention may be contained within “normal tungsten” syringes or “low tungsten” syringes. As will be appreciated by persons of ordinary skill in the art, the process of making glass syringes generally involves the use of a hot tungsten rod which functions to pierce the glass thereby creating a hole from which liquids can be drawn and expelled from the syringe. This process results in the deposition of trace amounts of tungsten on the interior surface of the syringe. Subsequent washing and other processing steps can be used to reduce the amount of tungsten in the syringe. As used herein, the term “normal tungsten” means that the syringe contains greater than 500 parts per billion (ppb) of tungsten. The term “low tungsten” means that the syringe contains less than 500 ppb of tungsten. For example, a low tungsten syringe, according to the present invention, can contain less than about 490, 480, 470, 460, 450, 440, 430, 420, 410, 390, 350, 300, 250, 200, 150, 100, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10 or fewer ppb of tungsten.


The rubber plungers used in syringes, and the rubber stoppers used to close the openings of vials, may be coated to prevent contamination of the medicinal contents of the syringe or vial and/or to preserve their stability. Thus, pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention, according to certain embodiments, may be contained within a syringe that comprises a coated plunger, or within a vial that is sealed with a coated rubber stopper. For example, the plunger or stopper may be coated with a fluorocarbon film. Examples of coated stoppers and/or plungers suitable for use with vials and syringes containing the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention are mentioned in, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,997,423; 5,908,686; 6,286,699; 6,645,635; and 7,226,554, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. Particular exemplary coated rubber stoppers and plungers that can be used in the context of the present invention are commercially available under the tradename “FluroTec®,” available from West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (Lionville, PA).


According to certain embodiments of the present invention, the pharmaceutical formulations may be contained within a low tungsten syringe that comprises a fluorocarbon-coated plunger. As discussed in the Examples section below, the combination of a low tungsten syringe and a fluorocarbon-coated plunger was observed to yield surprising stability characteristics with regard to the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention.


The pharmaceutical formulations can be administered to a patient by parenteral routes such as injection (e.g., subcutaneous, intravenous, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, etc.) or percutaneous, mucosal, nasal, pulmonary and/or oral administration. Numerous reusable pen and/or autoinjector delivery devices can be used to subcutaneously deliver the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention. Examples include, but are not limited to AUTOPEN™ (Owen Mumford, Inc., Woodstock, UK), DISETRONIC™ pen (Disetronic Medical Systems, Bergdorf, Switzerland), HUMALOG MIX 75/25™ pen, HUMALOG™ pen, HUMALIN 70/30™ pen (Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN), NOVOPEN™ I, II and III (Novo Nordisk, Copenhagen, Denmark), NOVOPEN JUNIOR™ (Novo Nordisk, Copenhagen, Denmark), BD™ pen (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ), OPTIPEN™, OPTIPEN PRO™, OPTIPEN STARLET™, and OPTICLIK™ (sanofi-aventis, Frankfurt, Germany), to name only a few. Examples of disposable pen and/or autoinjector delivery devices having applications in subcutaneous delivery of a pharmaceutical composition of the present invention include, but are not limited to the SOLOSTAR™ pen (sanofi-aventis), the FLEXPEN™ (Novo Nordisk), and the KWIKPEN™ (Eli Lilly), the SURECLICK™ Autoinjector (Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA), the PENLET™ (Haselmeier, Stuttgart, Germany), the EPIPEN (Dey, L.P.), and the HUMIRA™ Pen (Abbott Labs, Abbott Park, Ill.), to name only a few.


The use of a microinfusor to deliver the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention is also contemplated herein. As used herein, the term “microinfusor” means a subcutaneous delivery device designed to slowly administer large volumes (e.g., up to about 2.5 mL or more) of a therapeutic formulation over a prolonged period of time (e.g., about 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 or more minutes). See, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,629,949; 6,659,982; and Meehan et al., J. Controlled Release 46:107-116 (1996). Microinfusors are particularly useful for the delivery of large doses of therapeutic proteins contained within high concentration (e.g., about 100, 125, 150, 175, 200 or more mg/mL) and/or viscous solutions.


Therapeutic Uses of the Pharmaceutical Formulations


The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention are useful, inter alia, for the treatment, prevention and/or amelioration of any disease or disorder associated with IL-6 activity, including diseases or disorders mediated by activation of the IL-6 receptor. Exemplary, non-limiting diseases and disorders that can be treated and/or prevented by the administration of the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention include, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, pancreatitis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, vasculitis, Kawasaki disease, systemic lupus erythematosis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Sjogren syndrome, Still's disease, Castleman's disease, multiple sclerosis, diseases associated with abnormal blood coagulation or fibrinolysis (e.g., thrombosis), cancer (e.g., breast cancer, leukemia, ovarian cancer, melanoma, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, lymphoma, lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, multiple myeloma, etc.), cachexia, chronic rejection of transplanted organs and cells, cardiopathy, viral infection (e.g., HIV infection, EBV infection, etc.), plasmacytosis, hyperimmunoglobulinemia, anemia, nephritis, mesothelioma, and hearing loss and other inner ear disorders.


Thus, the present invention includes methods of treating, preventing, and/or ameliorating any disease or disorder associated with IL-6 activity or IL-6R activation (including any of the above mentioned exemplary diseases, disorders and conditions). The therapeutic methods of the present invention comprise administering to a subject any formulation comprising an anti-hIL-6R antibody as disclosed herein. The subject to which the pharmaceutical formulation is administered can be, e.g., any human or non-human animal that is in need of such treatment, prevention and/or amelioration, or who would otherwise benefit from the inhibition or attenuation of IL-6 and/or IL-6R-mediated activity. For example, the subject can be an individual that is diagnosed with, or who is deemed to be at risk of being afflicted by any of the aforementioned diseases or disorders. The present invention further includes the use of any of the pharmaceutical formulations disclosed herein in the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment, prevention and/or amelioration of any disease or disorder associated with IL-6 activity or IL-6R activation (including any of the above mentioned exemplary diseases, disorders and conditions).


EXAMPLES

The following examples are put forth so as to provide those of ordinary skill in the art with a complete disclosure and description of how to make and use the methods and compositions of the invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of what the inventors regard as their invention. Efforts have been made to ensure accuracy with respect to numbers used (e.g., amounts, temperature, etc.) but some experimental errors and deviations should be accounted for. Unless indicated otherwise, parts are parts by weight, molecular weight is average molecular weight, temperature is in degrees Centigrade, and pressure is at or near atmospheric.


Example 1. Stability of a Fully Human Anti-Human Interleukin-6 Receptor (IL-6R) Antibody (“mAb1”) After Storage at Low Temperatures

In this Example, various formulations were created containing an anti-human IL-6R antibody without excipients. The exemplary antibody used in this and all subsequent Examples set forth below is an antibody comprising a heavy chain variable region (HCVR) with the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 18, and a light chain variable region (LCVR) with the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:26. This antibody is referred to herein as “mAb1”.


As a preliminary experiment, the stability of mAb1 in liquid solution was determined following various amounts of time in frozen storage at −20° C., −30° C. and −80° C. The concentration of mAb1 used in this Example was 128 mg/mL. At various time points, the stability of mAb1 was determined by size exclusion high performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC) and by cation exchange high performance liquid chromatography (CEX-HPLC). Stability was assessed based on the percentage of native mAb1 remaining in the sample (by SE-HPLC; Table 4) and by the percentage of acidic species observed in the sample (by CEX-HPLC; Table 5) (An increase in percent acidic species is consistent with deamidation of the antibody and is thus considered an undesired phenomenon with respect to the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention).


The results of Tables 3 and 4 are depicted in FIGS. 1 and 2, respectively. These results show that mAb1 can remain stable at a concentration of 128 mg/mL for at least 9 months when stored at −80° C.









TABLE 4







% Native mAb1 Remaining (SE-HPLC)










Time
Storage Temperature












(months)
−80° C.
−30° C.
−20° C.







0
95.9
95.9
95.9



1
95.7
94.3
93.2



3
95.6
93.6
89.3



6
96.1
96.0
88.9



9
95.6
91.6
87.9

















TABLE 5







% Acidic Species (CEX-HPLC)













Time
Storage Temperature
















(months)
−80° C.
−30° C.
−20° C.









0
28.6
28.6
28.6





1
27.3
28.0
28.1





3
27.3
27.7
28.3





6
28.6
29.6
29.3





9
29.0
28.8
29.0










Example 2. Stability of mAb1 Formulations Containing Minimal Excipients

Eight different formulations containing mAb1 and minimal excipients as shown in Table 6 were prepared.









TABLE 6







mAb1 Minimal Excipient Formulations











mAb1


Formulation
Excipient
(mg/mL)





1
0.13% polysorbate 20
80



6% sucrose



2
0.13% polysorbate 20
80


3
1% sucrose
80


4
2% sucrose
80


5
4% sucrose
80


6
6% sucrose
80


7
none
80


8
none
65





All formulations contain 10 mM histidine, pH 6.0






The formulations were tested for stability by SE-HPLC after various amounts of time at −30° C. and −20° C. The results, expressed in percent of native mAb1 remaining, are shown in Tables 7 (−30° C. storage) and 8 (−20° C.).









TABLE 7







% Native mAb1 Remaining (SE-HPLC) After Storage at −30° C.








Time
Formulation # (see Table 6)















(months)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8





0
96.4
96.2
96.4
96.5
96.5
96.6
96.2
96.5


1
96.4
95.1
96.3
96.3
96.4
96.6
95.1
95.3


2
96.4
94.7
96.0
96.4
96.5
96.0
95.0
95.4


3
96.5
94.7
96.3
96.7
96.7
96.7
94.4
94.9


4
97.2
95.2
96.7
97.4
97.3
97.3
95.1
95.7


6
97.0
94.2
96.2
96.8
97.1
96.9
94.0
94.5


9
96.7
93.6
96.0
96.6
96.5
96.9
93.4
93.8
















TABLE 8







% Native mAb1 Remaining (SE-HPLC) After Storage at −20° C.








Time
Formulation # (see Table 6)















(months)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8





0
96.4
96.2
96.4
96.5
96.5
96.6
96.2
96.5


1
96.7
94.5
96.0
96.8
96.5
96.3
94.1
94.5


2
96.4
90.9
95.3
96.4
96.4
96.4
90.9
91.8


3
96.9
90.1
95.1
96.6
96.6
96.7
90.5
90.9


4
97.2
90.7
95.8
97.4
97.1
97.1
91.4
91.8


6
96.9
86.9
94.1
96.9
96.9
97.1
87.5
88.5


9
96.5
86.0
93.3
96.6
96.6
96.7
86.7
87.5









The results of Tables 7 and 8 are depicted in FIGS. 3 and 4, respectively. As shown in this Example, the stability of mAb1 was maintained to a significant extent in formulations 1, 4, 5 and 6 after several months of storage at −20° C. and −30° C. These results indicate that the stability of mAb1 at −20° C. and −30° C. can be enhanced by the addition of at least 2% sucrose.


Example 3. Stabilized Formulation of mAb1

A stabilized formulation containing various concentrations of mAb1 was prepared for use in Examples 4 and 5 below. This formulation, designated “Formulation A”, is shown in Table 9.









TABLE 9







Stabilized mAb1 Formulation “A”













Component
Formulation A



















mAb1
25-100
mg/mL





Histidine
10
mM














Polysorbate 20
0.2%





Sucrose
 10%










Example 4. Stability of Formulation A after Storage at 5° C.

Formulation A (see Example 3) containing 25, 50 or 100 mg/ml mAb1 was tested for stability after several months of storage at 5° C. in clear vials. Stability was assessed by the following parameters: (a) visual appearance; (b) turbidity (OD 405 nm); (c) pH; (d) percent total mAb1 recovered (as measured by RP-HPLC); (d) percent native mAb1 recovered (as measured by SE-HPLC); (e) percent main peak mAb1 recovered (as measured by CEX-HPLC); and (f) percent acidic species mAb1 recovered (as measured by CEX-HPLC). The stability results for Formulation A containing 25, 50 and 100 mg/ml of mAb1 are summarized in Tables 10, 11 and 12, respectively.









TABLE 10







Stability of Formulation A Containing 25 mg/mL


mAb1 After Storage at 5° C. in Clear Vials









Length of 5° C. Storage (months)














Parameter
0
1
2
3
6
9
12





Visual Appearance
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass


Turbidity (OD 405 nm)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00


pH
6.0
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1


% Total mAb1
100
99
101
112
103
94
101


Recovered









% Native mAb1
97.5
98.0
97.5
97.6
97.5
97.5
97.8


Recovered









% Main Peak mAb1
58.4
57.9
58.7
58.1
57.9
57.9
58.4


Recovered









% Acidic Species
26.5
28.0
26.5
28.0
27.3
28.0
27.9


mAb1 Recovered
















TABLE 11A







Stability of Formulation A Containing 50 mg/mL mAb1 After


Storage at 5° C. in Clear Vials (0-9 months)









Length of 5° C. Storage (months)













Parameter
0
1
2
3
6
9





Visual Appearance
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass


Turbidity (OD 405 nm)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00


pH
5.8
5.9
5.8
5.9
5.9
6.0


% Total mAb1
100
99
104
106
100
109


Recovered








% Native mAb1
97.4
97.5
97.3
97.2
97.3
97.2


Recovered








% Main Peak mAb1
57.1
56.7
58.0
54.2
53.3
57.9


Recovered








% Acidic Species
27.6
26.7
27.6
28.5
26.8
26.9


mAb1 Recovered
















TABLE 11B







Stability of Formulation A Containing 50 mg/mL mAb1


After Storage at 5° C. in Clear Vials (12-24 months)









Length of 5° C. Storage (months)










Parameter
12
18
24





Visual Appearance
Pass
Pass
Pass


Turbidity (OD 405 nm)
0.00
0.00
0.00


pH
5.9
6.0
5.9


% Total mAb1 Recovered
103
107
105


% Native mAb1 Recovered
97.1
97.1
96.9


% Main Peak mAb1 Recovered
56.4
57.1
56.4


% Acidic Species mAb1 Recovered
28.1
28.3
29.0
















TABLE 12A







Stability of Formulation A Containing 100 mg/ml mAb1


After Storage at 5° C. in Clear Vials (0-9 months)









Length of 5° C. Storage (months)













Parameter
0
1
2
3
6
9





Visual Appearance
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass


Turbidity (OD 405 nm)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00


pH
5.9
6.0
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.9


% Total mAb1
100
99
100
107
101
106


Recovered








% Native mAb1
97.3
97.0
97.0
97.1
96.9
96.9


Recovered








% Main Peak mAb1
55.1
55.5
57.9
55.9
55.4
56.8


Recovered








% Acidic Species
27.6
26.9
27.4
29.6
27.4
27.4


mAb1 Recovered
















TABLE 12B







Stability of Formulation A Containing 100 mg/mL mAb1


After Storage at 5° C. in Clear Vials (12-24 months)









Length of 5° C. Storage (months)










Parameter
12
18
24





Visual Appearance
Pass
Pass
Pass


Turbidity (OD 405 nm)
0.00
0.00
0.00


pH
6.0
6.0
6.0


% Total mAb1 Recovered
101
102
103


% Native mAb1 Recovered
96.8
96.7
96.5


% Main Peak mAb1 Recovered
57.3
57.5
56.7


% Acidic Species mAb1 Recovered
27.3
28.1
28.7









The results of this Example demonstrate that Formulation A containing 25, 50 or 100 mg/ml mAb1 remained stable after at least 9 months of storage, at 5° C. in clear vials, with about 97% or more of native mAb1 remaining in all samples after 9 months of storage under such conditions. For the 50 and 100 mg/mL formulations, 96.9% and 96.5% of native mAb1, respectively, was detected after up to 24 months of storage at 5° C. In addition, the percent acidic species remained at 29% or lower for all time points analyzed, thus confirming the stability of the formulations.


Similar stability studies were also carried out using Formulation A containing 75 mg/ml mAb1 following storage at 2-8° C. No significant degradation was observed for any of the concentrations tested after 24 months of 2-8° C. storage as determined by SE-HPLC and CEX-HPLC (data not shown).


Example 5. Stability of Formulation A Manufactured in Clear and Amber Glass Vials

Additional experiments were conducted to compare the stability of Formulation A (see Example 3) containing 25 and 100 mg/ml mAb1 manufactured in amber glass vials to the same formulation manufactured in clear vials. Two types of amber vials were used in this Example: 5 mL and 20 mL amber vials. Stability was assessed following storage at 5° C., 25° C. or 45° C. based on the same parameters as used in Example 4. The results for the 25 mg/ml and 100 mg/mL formulations are summarized in Tables 13 through 21.









TABLE 13







Stability of Formulation A Containing 25 mg/mL mAb1


After Storage at 5° C. in 5 mL clear Vials









Storage at 5° C. (months)















t = 0








Parameter
0
1
2
3
6
9
12





Visual Appearance
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass


Turbidity
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0


(OD 405 nm)









pH
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.1


% Total mAb1
100
106
103
98
100
100
101


Recovered









% Native mAb1
97.1
97.0
96.9
96.9
97.0
96.4
96.6


Recovered









% Main Peak
57.8
56.8
56.2
54.2
56.4
56.4
56.8


mAb1 Recovered









% Acidic Species
27.9
30.7
30.8
33.0
30.6
29.8
30.1


mAb1 Recovered
















TABLE 14







Stability of Formulation A Containing 100 mg/mL mAb1


After Storage at 5° C. in 5 mL Clear Vials









Storage at 5° C. (months)















t = 0








Parameter
0
1
2
3
6
9
12





Visual Appearance
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass


Turbidity
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0


(OD 405 nm)









pH
6.0
6.1
6.0
6.1
6.0
6.1
6.1


% Total mAb1
100
106
104
97
100
99
100


Recovered









% Native mAb1
96.2
96.3
96.1
96.0
95.9
95.5
95.4


Recovered









% Main Peak
57.6
57.3
57.9
55.5
56.2
56.4
55.4


mAb1 Recovered









% Acidic Species
28.2
30.2
29.4
31.1
30.7
30.0
32.2


mAb1 Recovered
















TABLE 15







Stability of Formulation A Containing 25 mg/mL mAb1


After Storage at 5° C. in 5 mL Amber Vials









Storage at 5° C. (months)















t = 0








Parameter
0
1
2
3
6
9
12

















Visual Appearance
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass


Turbidity
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0


(OD 405 nm)









pH
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0


% Total mAb1
100
104
104
98
99
97
101


Recovered









% Native mAb1
97.1
97.4
96.8
96.7
96.7
96.1
96.3


Recovered









% Main Peak
57.8
56.4
56.3
56.1
55.7
55.9
55.2


mAb1 Recovered









% Acidic Species
27.9
30.4
30.6
31.8
31.0
30.5
32.9


mAb1 Recovered
















TABLE 16







Stability of Formulation A Containing 100 mg/mL mAb1


After Storage at 5° C. in 5 mL Amber Vials









Storage at 5° C. (months)















t = 0








Parameter
0
1
2
3
6
9
12





Visual Appearance
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass


Turbidity
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0


(OD 405 nm)









pH
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.1


% Total mAb1
100
102
104
97
101
100
100


Recovered









% Native mAb1
96.2
95.0
96.0
96.0
95.8
95.0
95.3


Recovered









% Main Peak
57.6
56.9
58.0
55.6
56.3
56.5
55.1


mAb1 Recovered









% Acidic Species
28.2
30.1
29.4
31.4
30.4
30.0
32.3


mAb1 Recovered
















TABLE 17







Stability of Formulation A Containing 25 mg/mL mAb1


After Storage at 5° C. in 20 mL Amber Vials









Storage at 5° C. (months)















t = 0








Parameter
0
1
2
3
6
9
12





Visual Appearance
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass


Turbidity
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0


(OD 405 nm)









pH
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0


% Total mAb1
100
105
103
97
101
98
101


Recovered









% Native mAb1
97.1
96.9
97.0
96.8
97.0
96.2
96.6


Recovered









% Main Peak
57.8
56.4
57.1
55.9
55.6
56.1
55.2


mAb1 Recovered









% Acidic Species
27.9
20.9
30.2
30.5
30.7
30.0
31.9


mAb1 Recovered
















TABLE 18







Stability of Formulation A Containing 100 mg/mL mAb1


After Storage at 5° C. in 20 mL Amber Vials









Storage at 5° C. (months)















t = 0








Parameter
0
1
2
3
6
9
12





Visual Appearance
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass


Turbidity
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0


(OD 405 nm)









pH
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0


% Total mAb1
100
105
103
97
99
98
100


Recovered









% Native mAb1
96.2
96.2
96.0
96.0
95.8
95.4
95.5


Recovered









% Main Peak
57.6
57.9
56.3
56.5
56.5
56.4
55.3


mAb1 Recovered









% Acidic Species
28.2
29.8
30.4
30.3
30.6
30.0
30.9


mAb1 Recovered
















TABLE 19







Stability of Formulation A Containing 100 mg/mL mAb1


After Storage at 25° C. and 45° C. in Clear Vials












Storage at 45° C.
Storage at 25° C.



t = 0
(days)
(months)















Parameter
0
7
14
28
1
2
3
6





Visual
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass


Appearance










Turbidity
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0


(OD 405 nm)










pH
6.0
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1


% Total mAb1
100
101
97
105
105
102
97
101


Recovered










% Native mAb1
95.6
94.8
93.8
91.2
94.6
93.7
93.1
93.4


Recovered










% Main Peak
57.6
45.7
34.9
22.3
53.1
49.0
43.0
37.9


mAb1 Recovered










% Acidic Species
28.2
37.3
49.8
70.8
32.5
36.8
42.4
53.8


mAb1 Recovered
















TABLE 20







Stability of Formulation A Containing 100 mg/mL mAb1


After Storage at 25° C. and 45° C. in 5 mL Amber Vials












Storage at 45° C.
Storage at 25° C.



t = 0
(days)
(months)















Parameter
0
7
14
28
1
2
3
6





Visual Appearance
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass


Turbidity (OD 405 nm)
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02


pH
6.0
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.0


% Total mAb1 Recovered
100
101
100
105
106
103
97
100


% Native mAb1 Recovered
95.6
94.6
93.6
90.9
94.5
93.7
93.4
92.7


% Main Peak mAb1 Recovered
57.6
46.1
35.2
21.6
52.7
46.3
42.0
34.2


% Acidic Species mAb1 Recovered
28.2
37.3
50.1
70.9
32.8
39.6
43.4
57.3
















TABLE 21







Stability of Formulation A Containing 100 mg/mL mAb1


After Storage at 25° C. and 45° C. in 20 mL Amber Vials












Storage at 45° C.
Storage at 25° C.



t = 0
(days)
(months)















Parameter
0
7
14
28
1
2
3
6





Visual Appearance
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass


Turbidity (OD 405 nm)
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.02


pH
6.0
6.0
6.1
6.1
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0


% Total mAb1 Recovered
100
101
101
105
104
103
96
100


% Native mAb1 Recovered
95.6
94.9
93.8
91.5
94.3
94.0
93.6
93.5


% Main Peak mAb1 Recovered
57.6
45.7
34.2
23.3
52.7
49.3
43.5
36.7


% Acidic Species mAb1 Recovered
28.2
36.7
51.1
68.6
32.5
35.8
41.3
55.0









As shown in this Example, Formulation A containing 25 mg/ml or 100 mg/ml mAb1 exhibited equivalent stability profiles when stored in either clear or amber vials. Moreover, as demonstrated in Example 4 for storage in clear vials, relatively high stability of mAb1 was maintained in Formulation A when stored in either clear or amber vials at 5° C. for up to 12 months.


Example 6. Effect of Arginine, Histidine and Sucrose Concentrations on Viscosity and Stability of Formulations Containing 150 mg/ml mAb1

Several formulations were prepared containing 150 mg/mL, 175 mg/ml and 200 mg/ml mAb1 and various quantities of histidine, arginine and sucrose. Viscosity and osmolality were measured for each formulation. Additionally, the stability of the 150 mg/mL formulations after 4 weeks of storage at 45° C. was assessed in terms of percent native mAb1 remaining (by SE-HPLC) and percent main peak remaining (by CEX-HPLC). The results are summarized in Table 22.


The results presented in Table 16 indicate that increasing the histidine concentration to 25 mM or 100 mM and adding arginine to the formulation (25 mM or 50 mM) significantly reduced the viscosity of the formulation as compared to formulations containing only 10 mM histidine and no arginine. Furthermore, reducing the sucrose concentration from 10% to 5% with the added histidine and arginine decreased the viscosity of the formulation to an even greater extent.


Based at least in part on the foregoing, the following Formulations (designated “Formulation B” and “Formulation C”) set forth in Table 23 were prepared.









TABLE 22







Effect of Arginine, Histidine and Sucrose on Viscosity and Stability of mAb1 Formulations














mAb1
[Histidine]
[Arginine]
[Sucrose]
Viscosity
Osmolality
% native mAb1
% acidic


(mg/mL)
(mM)
(mM)
(%)
(cPoise)
(mOsm)
remaining*
species

















150
10
0
10
~15
375
90.8
19.9


150
25
25
10
~11.5
500
91.6
19.5


150
25
25
5
~8.5
305
91.8
19.8


150
25
25
2.5
~8.0
220
91.1
19.9


150
25
25
0
~8.5
115
90.3
20.6


175
10
0
10
~27
395




175
25
25
10
~20.5
415




175
25
25
5
~19
300




175
25
50
5
~14.5
390




175
100
0
5
~12.5
415




175
100
50
5
~10
515




200
10
0
10
~44
410




200
25
25
10
~35
480




200
25
25
5
~30
300




200
25
25
0
~28
130




200
100
0
10
~27
570




200
100
50
10
~21
670





Initial % native mAb1 = 96.5% (SE-HPLC)













TABLE 23







Stabilized mAb1 Formulations “B” and “C”











Component
Formulation B
Formulation C

















mAb1
25-200
mg/mL
25-200
mg/mL



Histidine
25
mM
25
mM











Polysorbate 20
0.2%
0.2%



Sucrose
  5%
  5%













Arginine
25
mM
50
mM







pH adjusted to 6.0






Example 7. Stability of Formulation B Containing 150 mg/ml mAb1 When Manufactured in a Vial and Syringes

Formulation B (see Table 23) containing 150 mg/ml mAb1 was prepared in a 2 mL glass vial and in two different syringes: regular and low tungsten. The preparations were stored at 5, 25 and 45° C. for various amounts of time. The stability of mAb1 following storage was measured by SE-HPLC and CEX-HPLC. The results are shown in Table 24. (An increase in percent acidic species is consistent with deamidation of the antibody and is thus considered an undesired phenomenon with respect to the pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention).









TABLE 24







Stability of Formulation B Containing 150 mg/mL mAb1 in Vial and Syringe













2 mL Glass Vial
Regular Syringe
Low Tungsten Syringe
















% Native
% Acidic
% Native
% Acidic
% Native
% Acidic


Temp
Time
(SE-HPLC)
(CEX-HPLC)
(SE-HPLC)
(CEX-HPLC)
(SE-HPLC)
(CEX-HPLC)


















Start
96.7
32.2
96.5
32.3
96.7
31.7















45° C.
14
days
94.1
52.7
94.3
54.5
94.3
56.1


45° C.
28
days
92.7
69.7
92.7
69.7
92.5
70.8


45° C.
56
days
86.7
84.7
87.8
82.6
86.9
83.5


25° C.
1
month
95.1
31.2
95.7
30.6
95.6
31.1


25° C.
2
month
95.3
34.6
94.7
37.4
96.0
36.3


25° C.
3
month
94.3
40.6
93.9
43.7
94.1
42.6


 5° C.
1
month
96.2
30.2
96.5
29.1
96.4
29.3


 5° C.
2
month
96.3
29.3
96.4
29.0
96.4
29.1


 5° C.
3
month
95.7
29.4
95.8
29.6
95.8
29.6









As shown in this table, Formulation B containing 150 mg/ml mAb1, stored at 5° C. in a glass vial or syringe, remained relatively stable for at least 3 months.


Example 8: Stability of mAb1 Formulations in Prefilled Syringes

A series of experiments was carried out to assess the stability of different mAb1 formulations in prefilled syringes. For these experiments various luer and staked needle, regular-tungsten and low-tungsten syringes were used in combination with different types of plungers (coated and uncoated) and tip-caps. The formulations were tested for stability after storage in prefilled syringes at 45° C., 25° C. and 5° C. for various amounts of time (ranging from 14 days to 12 months, depending on the conditions tested).


Six different formulations of mAb1 were tested for stability in prefilled syringes in this Example: (1) Formulation A (see Table 9) containing 100 mg/mL mAb1; (2) Formulation A (see Table 9) containing 25 mg/ml mAb1; (3) Formulation B (see Table 23) containing 150 mg/mL mAb1; (4) Formulation B (see Table 23) containing 25 mg/ml mAb1; (5) Formulation C (see Table 23) containing 175 mg/ml of mAb1; and (6) Formulation C (see Table 23) containing 25 mg/ml of mAb1.


Stability was assessed by the following parameters: (a) visual analysis; (b) turbidity (OD405 nm); (c) percent recovery by RP-HPLC; (d) percent native mAb1 by SE-HPLC; (e) percent main peak mAb1 by CEX-HPLC; and (f) percent acidic species by CEX-HPLC.


The results from a representative experiment assessing the stability of Formulation A, containing 100 mg/mL mAb1 in two different syringes (Syringe #1 and Syringe #2) are shown in Tables 25 and 26 below.









TABLE 25







Stability of Formulation A containing 100 mg/mL mAb1 in Staked Needle Prefilled Syringe #1


Syringe #1 Description:








Syringe:
BD 1 mL long 29 ga × 1/2″ Physiolis, Low Tungsten


Plunger:
West FluroTec ® 4023/50


Tip Cap:
BD 260


Siliconization:
Sprayed
















Visual
Turbidity

% Native
% Main
% Acidic


Temp
Time
Analysis
(OD405 nm)
% Recovery
mAb1
Peak
Species


















Start
Pass
0.00
100
96.6
56.9
28.7















45° C.
14
days
Pass
0.00
99
95.1
32.7
50.7


45° C.
28
days
Pass
0.01
103
92.6
20.9
66.1


45° C.
56
days
Pass
0.03
105
88.8
9.9
80.9


25° C.
1
month
Pass
0.00
106
95.6
52.4
32.0


25° C.
2
months
Pass
0.00
107
95.2
48.0
37.0


25° C.
3
months
Pass
0.00
106
94.2
44.8
41.8


25° C.
6
months
Pass
0.01
101
93.7
34.8
53.9


25° C.
9
months
Pass
0.03
98
91.4
26.1
64.6


25° C.
12
months
Pass
0.03
101
89.9
21.3
69.4


 5° C.
1
months
Pass
0.00
110
96.4
56.8
29.9


 5° C.
2
months
Pass
0.00
108
96.2
55.7
31.1


 5° C.
3
months
Pass
0.00
104
96.0
56.3
30.0


 5° C.
6
months
Pass
0.00
100
96.5
55.0
31.3


 5° C.
9
months
Pass
0.00
98
96.2
56.7
30.3


 5° C.
12
months
Pass
0.00
101
95.4
57.3
30.2









The results from another representative experiment assessing the stability of Formulation C, containing 175 mg/ml mAb1 in two different syringes (Syringe #1 and Syringe #3) are shown in Tables 27 and 28 below.









TABLE 26







Stability of Formulation A containing 100 mg/mL mAb1 in Staked Needle Prefilled Syringe #2


Syringe #2 Description:








Syringe:
Schott 1 mL Long SN CF 29 ga × 1/2″


Plunger:
West FluroTec ® 4023/50


Tip Cap:
Stelmi 4800 w/RNS


Siliconization:
Sprayed
















Visual
Turbidity

% Native
% Main
% Acidic


Temp
Time
Analysis
(OD405 nm)
% Recovery
mAb1
Peak
Species


















Start
Pass
0.00
100
96.3
57.5
28.0















45° C.
14
days
Pass
0.00
100
95.2
33.7
49.6


45° C.
28
days
Pass
0.00
103
93.3
22.8
64.7


45° C.
56
days
Pass
0.03
107
88.0
9.9
81.1


25° C.
1
month
Pass
0.00
108
95.5
52.5
31.8


25° C.
2
months
Pass
0.00
107
95.2
49.2
35.7


25° C.
3
months
Fail
0.00
106
93.9
43.1
42.0


25° C.
6
months
Fail
0.00
102
92.9
34.4
54.0


25° C.
9
months
Pass
0.02
100
92.3
26.9
63.5


25° C.
12
months
Pass
0.03
103
90.0
20.0
70.2


 5° C.
1
month
Pass
0.00
111
96.3
56.7
29.9


 5° C.
2
months
Pass
0.00
112
95.6
55.9
31.1


 5° C.
3
months
Pass
0.00
106
96.1
57.2
29.4


 5° C.
6
months
Pass
0.00
102
96.0
54.9
31.6


 5° C.
9
months
Pass
0.00
100
95.9
56.7
30.2


 5° C.
12
months
Pass
0.00
102
95.4
56.0
30.7
















TABLE 27







Stability of Formulation C containing 175 mg/mL mAb1 in Staked Needle Prefilled Syringe #1


Syringe #1 Description:








Syringe:
BD 1 mL long 29 ga × 1/2″ Physiolis, Low Tungsten


Plunger:
West FluroTec ® 4023/50


Tip Cap:
BD 260


Siliconization:
Sprayed
















Visual
Turbidity

% Native
% Main
% Acidic


Temp
Time
Analysis
(OD405 nm)
% Recovery
mAb1
Peak
Species


















Start
Pass
0.00
100
96.7
59.7
32.4















45° C.
7
days
Pass
0.01
102
96.1
48.6
39.5


45° C.
14
days
Pass
0.03
97
95.0
36.9
50.0


45° C.
28
days
Pass
0.03
98
91.9
24.7
66.0


45° C.
56
days
Pass
0.05
97
91.9
12.3
83.3


25° C.
1
month
Pass
0.02
99
95.4
56.9
33.8


25° C.
2
months
Pass
0.00
100
95.0
51.1
39.8


 5° C.
1
month
Pass
0.00
98
96.1
59.5
32.7


 5° C.
2
months
Pass
0.00
101
96.4
56.3
37.1
















TABLE 28







Stability of Formulation C containing 175 mg/mL mAb1 in Staked Needle Prefilled Syringe #3


Syringe #1 Description:








Syringe:
Daikyo Seiko CZ 1 mL std 30 ga × 1/2 ″


Plunger:
Daikyo D-21-6-1 FluroTec ® Coated


Tip Cap:
7028


Siliconization:
N/A
















Visual
Turbidity

% Native
% Main
% Acidic


Temp
Time
Analysis
(OD405 nm)
% Recovery
mAb1
Peak
Species


















Start
Pass
0.00
100
96.4
58.2
33.6















45° C.
7
days
Pass
0.00
101
95.7
45.4
40.4


45° C.
14
days
Pass
0.01
101
94.8
37.5
48.8


45° C.
28
days
Pass
0.04
96
94.0
29.4
59.4


45° C.
56
days
Pass
0.06
99
85.9
7.8
87.0


25° C.
1
month
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/D


 5° C.
1
month
Pass
0.00
100
96.4
56.7
34.0


 5° C.
2
months
Pass
0.00
101
96.2
54.7
34.0









The results from this set of experiments demonstrate that the different formulations remain relatively stable in prefilled syringes, especially when stored at temperatures of 25° C. and below, for one month or greater. Moreover, the various formulations of the invention appeared to have enhanced stability when contained in low tungsten syringes containing fluorocarbon-coated plungers.


The present invention is not to be limited in scope by the specific embodiments describe herein. Indeed, various modifications of the invention in addition to those described herein will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description and the accompanying figures. Such modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A pen delivery device containing a stable liquid pharmaceutical formulation comprising: (i) a human antibody that specifically binds to human interleukin-6 receptor (hIL-6R), wherein the antibody is at a concentration of from about 5 mg/ml to about 200 mg/ml and comprises a heavy chain variable region having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 18 and a light chain variable region having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:26;(ii) histidine at a concentration of from about 10 mM to about 25 mM;(iii) arginine at a concentration of from about 25 mM to about 50 mM;(iv) sucrose in an amount of from about 5% to about 10% w/v; and(v) polysorbate in an amount of from about 0.1% to about 0.2% w/v,wherein the formulation has a pH of about 5.8, about 6.0, or about 6.2, and at least 90% of the native form of the antibody is recovered after 1 month of storage at 45° C., as determined by size exclusion chromatography.
  • 2. The pen delivery device of claim 1, wherein the histidine is at a concentration of 21 mM.
  • 3. The pen delivery device of claim 2, wherein the arginine is present at a concentration of 45 mM.
  • 4. The pen delivery device of claim 3, wherein the sucrose is present in an amount of 5% w/v.
  • 5. The pen delivery device of claim 4, wherein the polysorbate is present at a concentration of 0.2% w/v.
  • 6. The pen delivery device of claim 5, wherein the polysorbate is polysorbate 20.
  • 7. The pen delivery device of claim 6, wherein the formulation has a pH of 6.
  • 8. The pen delivery device of claim 1, wherein the antibody is at a concentration of from 25 mg/ml to 200 mg/ml.
  • 9. The pen delivery device of claim 1, wherein the antibody is at a concentration of from 50 mg/ml to 180 mg/ml.
  • 10. The pen delivery device of claim 9, wherein the antibody is at a concentration of 150 mg/ml.
  • 11. The pen delivery device of claim 9, wherein the antibody is at a concentration of 175 mg/ml.
  • 12. The pen delivery device of claim 11, wherein at least 90% of the native form of the antibody is recovered after nine months of storage at 5° C., as determined by size exclusion-high performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC).
  • 13. The pen delivery device of claim 12, wherein at least 95% of the native form of the antibody is recovered after nine months of storage at 5° C., as determined by size exclusion-high performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC).
  • 14. The pen delivery device of claim 13, wherein at least 96% of the native form of the antibody is recovered after nine months of storage at 5° C., as determined by size exclusion-high performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC).
  • 15. The pen delivery device of claim 11, wherein the formulation exhibits a viscosity of less than about 15 cPoise.
  • 16. The pen delivery device of claim 11, wherein the formulation exhibits a viscosity of less than about 12 cPoise.
  • 17. The pen delivery device of claim 11, wherein the formulation exhibits a viscosity of less than about 9 cPoise.
  • 18. The pen delivery device of claim 1, wherein the pen delivery device is a disposable pen delivery device that is prefilled with the stable liquid pharmaceutical formulation.
  • 19. The pen delivery device of claim 1, wherein the human antibody that specifically binds to hIL-6R consists of two heavy chains and two light chains, each heavy chain comprising the heavy chain variable region comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 18 and a heavy chain constant region, and each light chain comprising the light chain variable region comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 26 and a light chain constant region.
  • 20. The pen delivery device of claim 1, wherein the human antibody that specifically binds to hIL-6R comprises two heavy chains and two light chains, each heavy chain comprising the heavy chain variable region comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 18 and a heavy chain constant region, and each light chain comprising the light chain variable region comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 26 and a light chain constant region.
  • 21. A pen delivery device containing a stable liquid pharmaceutical formulation comprising: (i) 25 to 200 mg/mL of a human antibody that specifically binds to human interleukin-6 receptor (hIL-6R), wherein the antibody comprises a heavy chain variable region having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:18 and a light chain variable region having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:26;(ii) about 21, 22, 23, 24 or 25 mM histidine;(iii) about 3%, 4% or 5% w/v sucrose;(iv) about 0.18%, 0.19% or 0.2% w/v polysorbate 20; and(v) about 45 or 50 mM arginine,wherein the formulation has a pH of about 6, and at least 90% of the native form of the antibody is recovered after 1 month of storage at 45° C., as determined by size exclusion chromatography.
  • 22. The pen delivery device of claim 21, wherein the pen delivery device is a disposable pen delivery device that is prefilled with the stable liquid pharmaceutical formulation.
  • 23. A pen delivery device containing a stable liquid pharmaceutical formulation comprising: (i) about 150 mg/mL of a human antibody that specifically binds to human interleukin-6 receptor (hIL-6R), wherein said antibody comprises a heavy chain and light chain variable region (HCVR/LCVR) amino acid sequence pair of SEQ ID NOs: 18/26;(ii) about 21 mM histidine;(iii) about 5% sucrose;(iv) about 0.2% polysorbate 20; and(v) about 45 mM arginine,wherein the formulation has a pH of about 6, and at least 90% of the native form of the antibody is recovered after 1 month of storage at 45° C., as determined by size exclusion chromatography.
  • 24. The pen delivery device of claim 23, wherein the pen delivery device is a disposable pen delivery device that is prefilled with the stable liquid pharmaceutical formulation.
  • 25. A pen delivery device containing a stable liquid pharmaceutical formulation comprising: (i) about 175 mg/mL of a human antibody that specifically binds to human interleukin-6 receptor (hIL-6R), wherein said antibody comprises a heavy chain and light chain variable region (HCVR/LCVR) amino acid sequence pair of SEQ ID NOs:18/26;(ii) about 21 mM histidine;(iii) about 5% sucrose;(iv) about 0.2% polysorbate 20; and(v) about 45 mM arginine,wherein the formulation has a pH of about 6, and at least 90% of the native form of the antibody is recovered after 1 month of storage at 45° C., as determined by size exclusion chromatography.
  • 26. The pen delivery device of claim 25, wherein the pen delivery device is a disposable pen delivery device that is prefilled with the stable liquid pharmaceutical formulation.
  • 27. The pen delivery device of claim 1, wherein the pen delivery device is a reusable pen delivery device that is prefilled with the stable liquid pharmaceutical formulation.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/100,020, filed Aug. 9, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,098,127, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/861,565, filed Sep. 22, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,072,086, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/986,223, filed Jan. 7, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,173,880, which claims the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) of U.S. Application No. 61/293,227, filed Jan. 8, 2010, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (86)
Number Name Date Kind
4997423 Okuda et al. Mar 1991 A
5016784 Batson May 1991 A
5480796 Kishimoto Jan 1996 A
5605690 Jacobs et al. Feb 1997 A
5670373 Kishimoto Sep 1997 A
5723120 Brakenhoff et al. Mar 1998 A
5795965 Tsuchiya et al. Aug 1998 A
5817790 Tsuchiya et al. Oct 1998 A
5888510 Kishimoto et al. Mar 1999 A
5888511 Skurkovich et al. Mar 1999 A
5908686 Sudo et al. Jun 1999 A
6046223 Sponsel et al. Apr 2000 A
6086874 Yoshida et al. Jul 2000 A
6261560 Tsujnaka et al. Jul 2001 B1
6286699 Sudo Sep 2001 B1
6410691 Kishimoto Jun 2002 B1
6629949 Douglas Oct 2003 B1
6632927 Adair et al. Oct 2003 B2
6645635 Murakai Nov 2003 B2
6659982 Douglas et al. Dec 2003 B2
6670373 Bonjouklian et al. Dec 2003 B1
6692742 Nakamura et al. Feb 2004 B1
6723319 Ito et al. Apr 2004 B1
7226554 Sudo et al. Jun 2007 B2
7320792 Ito et al. Jan 2008 B2
7479543 Tsuchiya et al. Jan 2009 B2
7582298 Stevens et al. Sep 2009 B2
8043617 Stevens et al. Oct 2011 B2
8080248 Radin et al. Dec 2011 B2
8183014 Stevens et al. May 2012 B2
8192741 Radin et al. Jun 2012 B2
8568721 Radin et al. Oct 2013 B2
8895521 Klinman et al. Nov 2014 B2
9139646 Solinger et al. Sep 2015 B2
9173880 Dix et al. Nov 2015 B2
9308256 Radin et al. Apr 2016 B2
9884916 Stevens et al. Feb 2018 B2
9943594 Jasson et al. Apr 2018 B2
10072086 Dix et al. Sep 2018 B2
11098127 Dix et al. Aug 2021 B2
20020187150 Mihara et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030092606 L'Italien et al. May 2003 A1
20030113316 Kaisheva et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030190316 Kakuta et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040071706 Ito et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040115197 Yoshizaki et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040197324 Liu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040202658 Benyunes Oct 2004 A1
20040219156 Goldenberg et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050142635 Tsuchiya et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050238644 Mihara et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060078531 Sota Apr 2006 A1
20060078532 Omoigui Apr 2006 A1
20060078533 Omoigui Apr 2006 A1
20060177436 Ghilardi et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060251653 Okuda et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060275294 Omoigui Dec 2006 A1
20060292147 Yoshizaki et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070036785 Kishimoto Feb 2007 A1
20070036788 Sheriff et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070098714 Nishimoto et al. May 2007 A1
20070148169 Yoshizaki et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070280945 Stevens et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080124325 Ito et al. May 2008 A1
20080131374 Medich et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080145367 Bove et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080269467 Allan et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090082288 Klinman et al. Mar 2009 A1
20100316627 Stevens et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100316636 Radin et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110098450 Igawa et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110171241 Dix et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110245473 Igawa et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120003697 Stevens et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120171123 Medich et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120258098 Radin et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130149310 Jasson et al. Jun 2013 A1
20140255390 Radin et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140302053 Huang et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150050277 Peters et al. Feb 2015 A1
20160002341 Dix et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160229916 Stevens et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160280782 Huang et al. Sep 2016 A1
20170252434 Joseph et al. Sep 2017 A1
20180296670 Jasson et al. Oct 2018 A1
20190002574 Dix et al. Jan 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (59)
Number Date Country
014226 Oct 2010 EA
014298 Oct 2010 EA
0 628 639 Dec 1994 EP
409607 Oct 1996 EP
783893 Jul 1997 EP
800829 Oct 1997 EP
811384 Dec 1997 EP
923941 Jun 1999 EP
1 004 315 May 2000 EP
1074268 Feb 2001 EP
1 108 435 Jun 2001 EP
1314437 May 2003 EP
1 327 681 Jul 2003 EP
1475100 Nov 2004 EP
1475101 Nov 2004 EP
0 413 908 Aug 2005 EP
1810980 Jul 2007 EP
1 334 731 Feb 2008 EP
2238985 Oct 2010 EP
2694767 Feb 1994 FR
2009-539349 Nov 2009 JP
H32358762 Jun 2009 RU
1992016553 Oct 1992 WO
1992019759 Nov 1992 WO
1994006476 Mar 1994 WO
1995009873 Apr 1995 WO
1996011020 Apr 1996 WO
2002100330 Dec 2002 WO
2003009817 Feb 2003 WO
2004039826 May 2004 WO
2004091658 Oct 2004 WO
2004096273 Nov 2004 WO
2005016280 Feb 2005 WO
2005028514 Mar 2005 WO
2005058365 Jun 2005 WO
2006033702 Mar 2006 WO
2007062040 May 2007 WO
2007070750 Jun 2007 WO
2007092772 Aug 2007 WO
2007143168 Dec 2007 WO
2007147001 Dec 2007 WO
2008020079 Feb 2008 WO
2007143168 Apr 2008 WO
2008049897 May 2008 WO
2008145142 Dec 2008 WO
2009086400 Jul 2009 WO
2009095489 Aug 2009 WO
2009109584 Sep 2009 WO
2009125825 Oct 2009 WO
2010035769 Apr 2010 WO
2010106812 Sep 2010 WO
2010149771 Dec 2010 WO
2011085158 Jul 2011 WO
2013053751 Apr 2013 WO
2015077582 May 2015 WO
2015148790 Oct 2015 WO
2016044343 Mar 2016 WO
2017079443 May 2017 WO
2017155990 Sep 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (128)
Entry
PCT/US2011/020457, Jan. 7, 2011, WO 2011/085158, Expired.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/986,223, filed Jan. 7, 2011, U.S. Pat. No. 9,173,880, Issued.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/861,565, filed Sep. 22, 2015, U.S. Pat. No. 10,072,086, Issued.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/293,227, filed Jan. 8, 2010, Expired.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/100,020, filed Aug. 9, 2018, U.S. Pat. No. 11,098,127, Issued.
(2011) International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Pharmaceutical Substances, World Health Organization, 53 Pages.
(Apr. 13, 2015) Phase II Study to Analyze Sarilumab in Non-Infectious Uveitis, NCT01900431 on Apr. 13, 2015, ClinicalTrials.gov Archive, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/archive/NCT01900431.
(Oct. 29, 2010) Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Bioactivity of Tocilizumab on Patients with Non-infectious UVEITIS: The STOP-UVEITIS Study (STOP-Uveitis), Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01717170.
(Oct. 30, 2012) Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Bioactivity of Tocilizumab on Patients with Non-infectious UVEITIS, The STOP-UVEITIS Study, ClinicalTrials.gov Archive.
Adan, et al. (Jul. 27, 2013) “Tocilizumab Treatment for Refractory Uveitis-Related Cystoid Macular Edema”, Graefes Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 251, No. 11, pp. 2627-2632.
Amit, et al. (Aug. 15, 1986) “Three-Dimensional Structure of An Antigen-Antibody Complex at 2.8 A Resolution”, Science, vol. 233, No. 4765, pp. 747-753.
Advisory Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/648,521, mailed on Jul. 19, 2016, 3 Pages.
Aletaha, et al. (Sep. 2010) “Rheumatoid Arthritis Classification Criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiative”, Arthritis and Rheumatology, vol. 62, No. 9, pp. 2569-2581.
An, et al. (Jan. 2010) “The Addition of Tocilizumab to DMARD Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials”, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 49-59.
Arevalo, J Fernando, (Nov. 25, 2014) “Tocilizumab Shows Promise for Refractory Uveitis-Related Macular Edema”, URL: https://www.aao.org/editors-choice/tocilizumab-shows-promise-refractory-uveitisrelate.
Barry, et al. (Sep. 1, 2014) “Pharmacotherapy for Uveitis: Current Management and Emerging Therapy”, Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 8, pp. 1891-1911.
Bresnick, George H. (Jul. 1986) “Diabetic Macular Edema. A Review.”, Ophthalmology, vol. 93, Issue 7, pp. 989-997.
Burmester, et al. (Jan. 2014) “A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Tocilizumab Versus Intravenous Tocilizumab in Combination with Traditional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arth”, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 69-74.
Burmester, et al. (May 2017) “Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Monotherapy Versus Adalimumab Monotherapy for the Treatment of Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (MONARCH): A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Phase III Trial”, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 76, No. 5, pp. 840-847.
Cao, et al. (Jun. 2013) “Pharmacological Blockade of Interleukin 6 Receptor (IL-6R) Inhibits the Development of Ocular Inflammation in the Murine Model of Experimental Autoimmune Uveitis (EAU)”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 54, Issued 15, 5193 Page.
Chester (Jul. 24, 2017) E-mail: “<External> CAS Registry No. RN1189541-98-7”.
Chichasova, et al. (2010) “Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Tactical Issues in the Practice of the Clinician”, The Attending Physician, No. 7/10.
Daugherty et al., “Formulation and delivery issues for monoclonal antibody therapeutics,” Adv. Drug Delivery Reviews, 58:686-706, (2006).
Davis, et al. (Nov. 2010) “Scale for Photographic Grading of Vitreous Haze in Uveitis”, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 150, No. 5, pp. 637-641. Pharmacology of TNF blockade.
Durrani, et al. (Sep. 2004) “Degree, Duration, and Causes of Visual Loss in Uveitis”, British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 88, No. 9, pp. 1159-1162.
Emery, et al. (Nov. 2008) “IL-6 Receptor Inhibition with Tocilizumab Improves Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Refractory to Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor Biologicals: Results From a 24-Week Multicentre Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial”, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 67, No. 11, pp. 1516-1523.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/648,521, mailed on Mar. 10, 2014, 9 Pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/648,521, mailed on Feb. 11, 2016, 12 Pages.
Fleischmann, et al. (Oct. 2014) “Comparable Efficacy with Sarilumab Plus Methotrexate in Biologic—Experienced and Biologic-Naïve Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis from a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, International Study”, Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 66, No. S10, pp. S1232.
Gandek, et al. (Summer 2004) “Psychometric Evaluation of the SF-36® Health Survey in Medicare Managed Care”, Health Care Financing Review, vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 5-25.
Genentech, et al. (2014) “ACTEMRA Subcutaneous Dosing & Administration Pocket Guide”, pp. 1-40.
Genovese, et al. (Jun. 2015) “Sarilumab Plus Methotrexate in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results of a Phase III Study”, Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 67, No. 6, pp. 1424-1437.
Gordon, et al. (Jul. 1998) “pANCA Antibodies in Patients with Anterior Uveitis: Identification of a Marker Antibody Usually Associated with Ulcerative Colitis”, Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 264-271.
HAQ (Jul. 30, 2019) “Scleroderma Study Conference”, English Translation, Retrieved from URL: <<http://derma.w3.kanazawa-u.ac.jp/SSc/pamphret/HAQ.html >>, 6 Pages (4 Pages of English Translation & 2 Pages of Official Copy).
Hennigan, et al. (Aug. 2008) “Interleukin-6 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis”, Therapeutics and clinical risk management, vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 767-775.
Hirata, et al. (Nov. 1, 1989) “Characterization of IL-6 Receptor Expression by Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies”, The Journal of Immunology, vol. 143, No. 9, pp. 2900-2906.
Huizinga, et al. (Sep. 2014) “Sarilumab, A Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody Against IL-6Rα in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Efficacy and Safety Results from the randomised SARIL-RA-MOBILITY Part A Trial”, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 73, No. 9, pp. 1626-1629.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/EP2012/070052, mailed on Jan. 10, 2013, 10 Pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/070052, mailed on Mar. 18, 2013, 7 Pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/066856, mailed on Apr. 2, 2015, 11 Pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/050291, mailed on Dec. 1, 2015, 12 Pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/060344, mailed on Mar. 13, 2017, 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/021149, mailed on Jul. 18, 2017, 14 Pages.
Kawashima, et al. (Apr. 6, 2007) “Soluble IL-6 Receptor in Vitreous Fluid of Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy”, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 100-104.
Kishimoto, et al. (2003) “Interleukin-6 (IL-6)”, The Cytokine Handbook. Ed.: Thomson. Academic Press. London, United Kingdom, vol. 12, pp. 281-304.
Kivitz, et al. (Nov. 2014) “Subcutaneous Tocilizumab Versus Placebo in Combination with Disease—Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis”, Rheumatoid Arthritis, vol. 66, Issue 11, pp. 1653-1661.
Langer, Robert (Sep. 28, 1990) “New Methods of Drug Delivery”, Science, vol. 249, Issue 4976, pp. 1527-1533.
Lederman, et al. (Nov. 1991) “Single Amino Acid Substitution in a Common African Allele of the CD4 Molecule Ablates Binding of the Monoclonal Antibody, OKT4”, Molecular Immunology, vol. 28, No. 11, pp. 1171-1181.
Li, et al. (May 2004) “Temporal Associations Between Interleukin 22 and the Extracellular Domains of IL-22R and IL-1 OR2”, International Immunology, vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 693-708.
Lin, Phoebe (Sep. 1, 2015) “Targeting Interleukin-6 For Noninfectious Uveitis”, Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 9, pp. 1697-1702.
Lipsky, Peter E. (2006) “Interleukin-6 and Rheumatic Diseases”, Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 8, Suppl 2, S4, pp. 1-5.
McGovern, Timothy J. (Oct. 19, 2016) “Center for Drug Evaluation and Research”, Application No. 761037Orig1s000, pp. 01-278.
Meehan et al., “A microinfusor device for the delivery of therapeutic levels of peptides and macromolecules,” Journal of Controlled Release, 46:107-116 (1996).
Merida, et al. (Aug. 11, 2015) “New Immunosuppressive Therapies in Uveitis Treatment”, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16, No. 8, pp. 18778-18795.
Mesquida, et al. (Sep. 6, 2014) “Long-Term Effects of Tocilizumab Therapy for Refractory Uveitis-Related Macular Edema”, Ophthalmology, vol. 121, No. 12, pp. 2380-2386.
Mihara, et al. (Nov. 2005) “Tocilizumab Inhibits Signal Transduction Mediated by Both mIL-6R and sIL-6R, But Not by the Receptors of Other Members of IL-6 Cytokine Family”, International Immunopharmacology, vol. 5, No. 12, pp. 1731-1740.
Nguyen, et al. (Jun. 2015) “The SATURN Study (SARIL-NIU): Sarilumab for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Non-Infectious Uveitis (NIU)”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 56, No. 7, 3116 pages.
Nicassio, et al. (Jan. 2012) “The Contribution of Pain and Depression to Self-Reported Sleep Disturbance in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis”, Pain, vol. 153, No. 1, pp. 107-112.
“Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi”, Japan Internal Medical Association Magazine, vol. 101, No. 10, pp. 2893-2898.
Nishimoto, et al. (Nov. 1, 2008) “Study of Active Controlled Tocilizumab Monotherapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate (SATORI): Significant Reduction in Disease Activity and Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor by IL-6 Receptor Inhibition Th”, Modern Rheumatology, vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 12-19.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/648,521, mailed on Jul. 3, 2014, 11 Pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/648,521, mailed on Jun. 26, 2015, 9 Pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/648,521, mailed on Mar. 19, 2015, 8 Pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/648,521, mailed on Oct. 18, 2013, 10 Pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/350,973, mailed on Feb. 5, 2016, 17 Pages.
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/350,973, mailed on Jun. 14, 2016, 8 Pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/350,973, mailed on Oct. 18, 2019, 10 Pages.
Nussenblatt, et al. (Apr. 1985) “Standardization of Vitreal Inflammatory Activity in Intermediate and Posterior Uveitis”, Ophthalmology, vol. 92, No. 4, pp. 467-471.
Ongkosuwito, et al. (Dec. 1998) “Analysis of Immunoregulatory Cytokines in Ocular Fluid Samples from Patients with Uveitis”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 39, No. 13, pp. 2659-2665.
Panka, et al. (May 1988) “Variable Region Framework Differences Result in Decreased or Increased Affinity of Variant Anti-Digoxin Antibodies”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 85, pp. 3080-3084.
Paul-Pletzer (2006) “Tocilizumab: Blockade of Interleukin-6 Signaling Pathway as a Therapeutic Strategy for Inflammatory Disorders”, Drugs of Today, vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 559-576.
Patro et al., “Protein formulation and fill-finish operations,” Biotechnol Annu Rev, 8:55-84, (2002). Abstract only.
PCT International Preliminary Report of Patentability for application PCT/US2011/020457 issued Jul. 10, 2012.
PCT International Search Report for application PCT/US2011/020457 mailed Feb. 7, 2011.
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for application PCT/US2011/020457 mailed Feb. 7, 2011.
Perez, et al. (Sep. 2004) “Elevated Levels of Interleukin 6 in the Vitreous Fluid of Patients with Pars Planitis and Posterior Uveitis: The Massachusetts Eye & Ear Experience and Review of Previous Studies”, Ocular Immunology and Inflammation, vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 193-201.
Powchik (Jul. 15, 2010) “Investor Day”, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, pp. 1-19.
Powell, et al. (Sep.-Oct. 1998) “Compendium of Excipients for Parenteral Formulations”, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 238-311.
Presta (2006) “Engineering of Therapeutic Antibodies to Minimize Immunogenicity and Optimize Function”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, pp. 640-656.
Radin, et al. (Jan. 1, 2010) “Safety and Effects on Markers of Inflammation of Subcutaneously Administered regn88/sar153191 (regn88), an Interleukin-6 Receptor Inhibitor, in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Findings from Phase 1 Studies”, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 69, Supplement 3, XP008158577, 99 Page.
Radin, et al. (Nov. 2010) “REGN88/SAR153191, a fully-human interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, reduces acute phase reactants in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: preliminary observations from Phase 1 studies.”, Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 62, Supplement 10, XP008158581, p. S1121.
Rafique, et al. (Jun. 23, 2013) “Evaluation of the Binding Kinetics and Functional Bioassay Activity of Sarilumab and Tocilizumab to the Human IL-6 Receptor (IL-6r) alpha”, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 72, Issue Suppl 3, pp. A797.1-A797.
Regeneron (Jun. 12, 2014) “Sanofi and Regeneron Announce New, Detailed Data from Positive Sarilumab Phase 3 Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial at EULAR”.
Regeneron (Nov. 22, 2013) “Sanofi and Regeneron Report Positive Results with Sarilumab in First Phase 3 Rheumatoid Arthritis Registration Trial”, Press Release, Acquire Media, Retrieved From: <<https://investor.regeneron.com/news-releases/news-release-details/sanofi-and-regeneron-report-positive-results-sarilumab-first>>, 6 pages.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (Jul. 12, 2011) “Evaluation of Sarilumab (SAR153191/REGN88) on Top of Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (RA-MOBILITY)”, Retrieved from the internet from URL <<https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=SAR+153191=mobility>>.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (Jul. 12, 2011) “Sanofi and Regeneron Report Positive Phase 2b Trial Results with Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis”, Acquire Media, Retrieved form URL: <http://web.archive.org/web/20110818152737/http://investorregeneron.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseiD=590869>>, 3 pages.
Reichert, Janice M. (Jan.-Feb. 2011) “Antibody-Based Therapeutics to Watch in 2011”, MABS, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 76-99.
Reddy et al., “Elimination of Fc Receptor-Dependent Effector Functions of a Modified IgG4 Monoclonal Antibody to Human CD4,” Journal of Immunology, 164:1925-1933 (2000).
Restriction Requirement received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/648,521, mailed on Jun. 10, 2013, 7 Pages.
Restriction Requirement received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/350,973, mailed on Aug. 19, 2015, 8 Pages.
Rose-John, et al. (May 17, 2006) “Interleukin-6 Biology is Coordinated by Membrane-Bound and Soluble Receptors: Role in Inflammation and Cancer”, Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 80, No. 2, pp. 227-236.
Rudikoff, et al. (Mar. 1, 1982) “Single Amino Acid Substitution Altering Antigen-Binding Specificity”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 79, pp. 1979-1983.
Sanofi (Feb. 2, 2010) “Evaluation of Sarilumab (SAR153191/REGN88) on Top of Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients (RA-MOBILITY)”, Clinical Trials.gov, Retrieved from: <<http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01061736>>, 6 pages.
Sanofi (Nov. 7, 2013) “View of NCT01061736 on 2013_11_07: ClinicaiTrials.gov Archive”, Retrieved from URL: <<https://clinicaltrials.gov/archive/NCT01061736/2013_11_07>>.
Sanofi (Oct. 7, 2010) “Effect of SAR153191 (REGN88) With Methotrexate in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Failed TNF-α Blockers”, ClinicalTrials.gov, Retrieved from: <<http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01217814>>, 5 pages.
Sanofi (Sep. 27, 2011) “View of NCT01217814 on Sep. 27, 2011”, ClinicaiTrials.gov, Retrieved from URL: <<https://clinicaltrials.gov/archive/NCT01217814/2011_09_27>>, 4 pages.
Sanofi and Regeneron (May 21, 2015) “Sanofi and Regeneron Announce Positive Topline Results from Phase 3 Studies with Sarilumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis”, Press Release, Retrieved from http://mediaroom.sanofi.com/sanofi-and-regeneron-announce-positive-topline-results-from-phase-3-studies-witharilumab-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-2, 4 pages.
Sanofi and Regeneron (Nov. 8, 2015) “Regeneron and Sanofi Present Results from Pivotal Phase 3 Study of Sarilumab at American College of Rheumatology Annual Meeting”, Press Release, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Retrieved from http://investor.regeneron.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=941387.
Schulten, et al. (1996) “Recent Developments in the Treatment of Posterior Uveitis”, Ocular Immunology and Inflammation, vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 207-217.
Shields et al., “Lack of Fucose on Human IgG1 N-Linked Oligosaccharide Improves Binding to Human Fc gamma RIII and Antibody-dependent Cellular Toxicity,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277(30):26733-26740 (2002).
Smolen, et al. (Mar. 22-28, 2008) “Effect of Interleukin-6 Receptor Inhibition with Tocilizumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (Option Study): A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomised Trial”, The Lancet, vol. 371, Issue 9617, pp. 987-997.
Strand, et al. (2012) “Health-related Quality of Life Outcomes of Adalimumab for Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from a Randomized Multicenter Study”, The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 39, pp. 63-72.
Taylor, Peter C. (Jun. 2010) “Pharmacology of TNF Blockade in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Other Chronic Inflammatory Diseases”, Current Opinion in Pharmacology, vol. 10, Issue 3, pp. 308-315.
The Chemical Abstracts Service CAS, 1189541-98-7.
Uchiyama, et al. (2008) “Tocilizumab, A Humanized Anti-Interleukin-6 Receptor Antibody, Ameliorates Joint Swelling in Established Monkey Collagen-Induced Arthritis”, Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 1159-1163.
U.S. Adopted Names Council “Statement on a Nonproprietary Name Adopted by the USAN Council: Sarilumab”, CAS Registry No. 1189541-98-7.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/986,223, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 27, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/986,223, Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 14, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/986,223, Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 9, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/986,223, Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 15, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/986,223, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 22, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/986,223, Requirement for Restriction/Election mailed Dec. 30, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/861,565, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 17, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/861,565, Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 4, 2017.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/861,565, Notice of Allowance mailed May 10, 2018.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/986,223, Final Office Action mailed May 14, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/100,020, Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 13, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/100,020, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 9, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/100,020, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 16, 2021.
Valentincic, et al. (Jul. 20, 2011) “Intraocular and Serum Cytokine Profiles in Patients with Intermediate Uveitis”, Molecular Vision, vol. 17, pp. 2003-2010.
Vasanthi, et al. (Dec. 2007) “Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Review”, APLAR Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 270-274.
Wang et al., “MINIREVIEW: Antibody Structure, Instability, and Formulation,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 96(1):1-26, (2007).
Wang, “Instability, stabilization, and formulation of liquid protein pharmaceuticals,” Int'l J. Pharmaceutics, 185(2):129-188, (1999).
Whalley, et al. (1997) “Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis”, British Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 36, pp. 884-888.
WHO (Dec. 9, 2004) “International Nonproprietary Names for Pharmaceutical Substances (INN)”, WHO Drug Information vol. 25, No. 4, 20 pages.
Wiens, et al. (Jun. 2010) “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis”, Rheumatology International, vol. 30, Issue 8, pp. 1063-1070.
Wu, et al. (Apr. 5, 1987) “Receptor-Mediated In Vitro Gene Transformation by a Soluble DNA Carrier System”, Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 262, No. 10, pp. 4429-4432.
Yoshimura, et al. (2009) “Comprehensive Analysis of Inflammatory Immune Mediators in Vitreoretinal Diseases”, PLoS One, vol. 4, No. 12, pp. 1-9.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210230283 A1 Jul 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61293227 Jan 2010 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 16100020 Aug 2018 US
Child 17225887 US
Parent 14861565 Sep 2015 US
Child 16100020 US
Parent 12986223 Jan 2011 US
Child 14861565 US