Stabilized Pharmaceutical

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 5541231
  • Patent Number
    5,541,231
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, August 25, 1994
    31 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 30, 1996
    29 years ago
Abstract
This application discloses a method of inhibiting degradation of the antidepressant bupropion hydrochloride in a solid pharmaceutical formulation, so that the pharmaceutical formulation will maintain at least 80% of its initial bupropion potency after one year.
Description

The present invention relates to pharmaceutical compositions comprising bupropion hydrochloride and a pharmaceutically acceptable stabiliser and methods of stabilising bupropion hydrochloride in a pharmaceutical composition.
Bupropion hydrochloride is a known antidepressant sold in instant release tablet form under the brand name WELLBUTRIN.RTM.. (Also see U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,819,706 and 3,885,046; 1993 Physicians Desk Reference and the Merck Index, Eleventh Edition, Entry No. 1488. While the instant release tablets currently sold are quite suitable for the indicated use, the method of manufacturing these is less than desirable based on cost as well as process conditions.
The object of the present invention is to prevent (inhibit) the degradation of bupropion hydrochloride, using stabiliser ingredients, thus allowing the preparation of pharmaceutical compositions such as instant and sustained release tablets and capsules which, from a cost of manufacture and processing standpoint, are much improved over those achievable in the past.
Thus the present invention provides a pharmaceutical composition in solid form comprising bupropion hydrochloride and a pharmaceutically acceptable stabiliser in an effective stabilising amount, in which the composition contains at least about 80% w/w of undegraded bupropion hydrochloride after storage for 6 weeks at about 40.degree. C. and 75% relative humidity and in which an aquaous solution of the stabiliser in a concentration of about 6% w/w has a pH of about 0.9 to about 4, the stabiliser being selected from an organic acid, a carboxylic acid, an acid salt of an amino acid, and sodium metabisulphite.
Alternatively, the present invention also provides a pharmaceutical composition in solid form comprising bupropion hydrochloride and a pharmaceutically acceptable stabiliser in an effective stablising amount, in which the composition contains at least about 80% w/w of undegraded bupropion hydrochloride after storage for 6 weeks at about 50.degree. C. and 27% relative humidity and in which an aqueous solution of the stabiliser in a concentration of about 6% w/w has a pH of about 0.9 to about 4, the stabiliser being selected from an organic acid, a carboxylic acid other than ascorbic acid and isoascorbic acid, an acid salt of an amino acid, and sodium metabisulphite.
The preferred pH of the aqueous solution of the stabiliser is 0.9 to about 2 and most preferably 1.
Preferably the pharmaceutical composition according to the present invention contains at least about 90% w/w of undegraded bupropion hydrochloride after storage for 6 weeks under the above conditions and more preferably 95% or even 98%. In an additional aspect, the amount of undegraded bupropion hydrochloride is greater than 80% of its labeled strength, and more preferably greater than 90% percent of the labeled strength after one year of storage under the humidity and temperature conditions usually encountered in pharmacies and medicine cabinets i.e. room temperature and 35-60% humidity. Thus, when used in a pharmaceutical preparation for example, a tablet, it will still retain at least 80% of its potency and preferably at least 90% after one year of storage at room temperature (15.degree.-25.degree. C. (59.degree.-77.degree. F.)) at 35-60% humidity. For example if the tablet initially contains 100 mg bupropion hydrochloride (labeled amount) at time of preparation, after one year storage at least 80 mg of bupropion hydrochloride will remain in the tablet.
The amount of the stabiliser which may be used with the present invention may vary, but preferably is about 2.7% to 27%, most preferably about 5% to 16.2% based on the label strength of bupropion hydrochloride in the pharmaceutical formulation (composition) in solid form. For example if a formulation contains 100 mg of bupropion hydrochloride it would preferably contain about 2.7 to 27 g of stabiliser.
Stabilisers of use in this invention include organic acids, carboxylic acids, acid salts of amino acids, and sodium metabisulphite. Preferably, the acid salts of amino acids are hydrochloride salts such as cysteine hydrochloride, glycine hydrochloride or cysteine dihydrochloride.
Other preferred examples of stabilisers according to the present invention include: ascorbic acid, malic acid, isoascorbic acid, citric acid and tartaric acid. L-cysteine hydrochloride and glycine hydrochloride are the most preferred stabilisers.
In the examples the cysteine hydrochloride is in the L form and NF and USP are designations for standards published in the National Formulary and US Pharmacopeia, respectfully.
The present invention extends to the use of combinations of stabilisers especially combinations of the aforementioned stabilisers.
The pH of the aqueous solution of the stabilisers may be determined as follows:
The stabiliser is weighed out to provide 3.75 grams thereof, (except for 3.34 grams of L-cysteine dihydrochloride) and is then added to 60 grams of distilled water in a glass Pyrex.RTM. beaker. The resulting mixture is stirred for approximately 5 minutes, using a stir plate and magenetic stir bar. The resulting solution or dispersion is examined using either a Orion Model 701A Ionalyzer.RTM., or an Accumet pH Meter Model 915. Solutions are stirred with a magnetic stir bar during analysis. Measurements of pH are performed in triplicate and the average thereof is used.
Examples of forms of preferred solid pharmaceutical composition include a tablet or capsule. Such forms are prepared using standard procedures known in the art which involve admixing buproprion hydrochloride and the stabiliser with the tablet or capsule excipients. Such excipients may include, for example, microcrystalline cellulose, sodium starch glycolate and/or corn starch, talc, magnesium stearate and colloidal silicon dioxide. Caplets are tablets generally shaped in the form of capsules. Capsules of this invention are generally prepared by mixing the stabiliser with bupropion hydrochloride and other excipients and placing same in, e.g., a two-part hard gelatin capsule.
Preferably the weight of the inactive ingredients is greater than about 11/2 times that of bupropion hydrochloride but less than about 4 times that of bupropion hydrochloride. The tablet or capsules of this invention generally contain 25 mg to 500 mg of buproprion hydrochloride and usually contain 50 mg, 75 mg, 100 mg or 150 mg of bupropion hydrochloride. The amount of bupropion hydrochloride in solid form pharmaceutical compositions e.g. tablets after storage, may be determined using standard procedures such as high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
This invention is also directed to a new and improved method for stabilising the antidepressant bupropion hydrochloride to prevent the degradation thereof by admixing the stabiliser with bupropion hydrochloride. In this way a pharmaceutical composition is produced in which the bupropion hydrochloride is inhibited from degrading thus facilitating the storage of the composition over a prolonged period of time at room temperature i.e. under humidity and temperature conditions usually encountered in pharmacies and in medicine cabinets.





The following examples are representative of the invention.
In the examples, cysteine hydrochloride means L-cysteine hydrochloride.
EXAMPLE 1
The formulation contained the following ingredients in the following amounts:
______________________________________ 100 mg potency Weight (mg)Ingredient per tablet 75 mg potency______________________________________Bupropion hydrochloride 100.00 75.0Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 91.3 68.5Sodium starch glycolate, NF 9.2 6.9L-Cysteine hydrochloride, NF 5.0 3.8Talc, USP 23.0 17.3Magnesium stearate, NF 1.2 0.9Colloidal silicon dioxide, NF 0.3 0.2TOTAL 230.0 mg 172.6 mg______________________________________
The powder ingredients were weighed out for a 120,000 tablet batch size for the 100 mg potency and a 160,000 tablet batch size for the 75 mg potency.
The bupropion hydrochloride, microcystalline cellulose and sodium starch glycolate were sifted through a 30 mesh Russell-Finex sifter.
The sifted ingredients were blended for 15 minutes in a 3 cu. ft. slant-cone blender.
The blended ingredients were granulated as follows:
The cysteine hyrdrochloride was dissolved in 1.28 kg of purified water using a Lightnin.RTM. Mixer. This cysteine hydrochloride solution was added to 5.12 kg of SD3A alcohol (anhydrous) and mixed thoroughly using a Lightnin.RTM. Mixer. The blended ingredients were placed in a 3 cu. ft. Littleford Lodige granulator and ganulated using the cysteine hydrochloride solution. Mixing time was 3 to 5 minutes and chopper time was 3 to 5 minutes. Wetness was checked and additional 80% w/w SD3A alcohol (aqueous) solution was added to achieve appropriate massing.
Clumps of wet granule were broken up by hand.
Granule was dried in a WST-30 Glatt fluid-bed dryer until loss on drying (by CompuTrac.RTM., 90.degree. C.) of granule was between 1 to 2%. Fluid-bed dryer parameters were set as follows:
Inlet air temperature: 60.degree. C.
Air volume: 200-800 cu meter/hr
Pre-heat temperature: 25.degree. C.
Dew point: 10.degree. C.
By-pass flap: 50%
Shaker interval: 5 seconds every 2 minutes
Dried granule was sifted through a 20 mesh Russell-Finex sifter.
Talc (pre-sifted 60 mesh) was added to a small amount of dried granule, sifted through a 20 mesh Russell Finex sifter, added to a 3 cu. ft. slant-cone blender and blended with the remainder of the granule for 5 minutes. Magnesium stearate and colloidal silicon dioxide was sifted together through a 30 mesh Russell-Finex sifter and blended in a table-top v-shell blender for 20 minutes. This magnesium stearate/colloidal silicon dioxide blend was then added to the dried granule in the 3 cu. ft. slant-cone blender and blended an additional 5 minutes.
The lubicated granule was compressed on a rotary-type Manesty Betapress.RTM. in a controlled humidity environment of less than 30% relative humidity. Tablets were compressed at a compression weight of about 230 mg for the 100 mg potency and about 172.6 mg for the 75 mg potency. Round, 7.8 mm, concave, plain punches were used for the 100 mg potency and round, 7.0 mm, concave, plain punches were used for the 75mg potency.
Tablets were dedusted using a Manesty Tablet Deduster.
A portion of tablets was film-coated using a compu-lab Acella--Cota.RTM. film-coater. The aqueous film coat Opadry.RTM. Red YS-1-1846 was used for the 100 mg potency and Opadry.RTM. Yellow YS-1-2186 for the 75 mg potency (supplied by Colocon, Inc. of 415 Moyer Blvd, West Point, Pa. 19486. The Accela--Cota.RTM. parameters were:
Inlet air temperature: 50.degree.-80.degree. C.
Inlet air volume: 100-500 cfm
Exhaust air temperature: 50.degree.-60.degree. C.
Tablets were coated to a weight gain of 1-5% based on the core tablet weight to achieve an acceptable color intensity.
EXAMPLE 2
The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that lubricant levels were changed, resulting in the following formulation:
______________________________________ 100 mg potency tabletIngredient Weight (mg) per tablet______________________________________Bupropion hydrochloride 100.0Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 91.3Sodium starch glycolate, NF 9.2L-Cysteine hydrochloride 5.0Talc, USP 23.0Magnesium stearate, NF 2.4Colloidal silicon dioxide, NF 0.6TOTAL 231.5______________________________________
EXAMPLE 3
The procedure of Example 2 was repeated except;
In order to achieve a 75 mg potency, the tablets were compressed using 7.0 mm, round, concave, plain punches and were not film-coated. Tablets had the resulting formulation:
______________________________________ 75 mg potency tabletIngredient Weight (mg) per tablet______________________________________Bupropion hydrochloride 75.0Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 68.5Sodium starch glycolate, NF 6.9L-Cysteine hydrochloride 3.8Talc, USP 17.3Magnesium stearate, NF 1.8Colloidal silicon dioxide, NF 0.5TOTAL 173.8______________________________________
EXAMPLE 4
Tablets are manufactured according to the following formulation:
______________________________________ 100 mg potency tabletIngredient Weight (mg) per tablet______________________________________Bupropion hydrochloride 100.0Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 91.3Sodium starch gycolate, NF 9.2Glycine hydrochloride 5.0Talc, USP 23.0Magnesium stearate, NF 1.2Colloidal silicon dioxide, NF 0.32TOTAL 230.0 MG______________________________________
Sufficient powder ingredients were weighed out to make approximately 24.000 tablets.
The bupropion hydrochloride, microcrystalline cellulose and sodium starch glycolate were sifted through a 30 mesh Russell-Finex sifter.
The sifted ingredients were blended for 15 minutes in a Patterson-Kelly (PK) v-shell blender.
The blended ingredients were granulated as follows:
A quantity of purified water, USP that equals approximately 25% of the total weight of granulating solvent needed to impart the desired granule wetness was weighed out. The glycine hydrochloride was dissolved in the purified water using a Lightin.RTM. Mixer. The glycine hydrochloride solution was added to a quantity of SD3A alcohol, anhydrous, equal to the remaining 75% of the total weight of solvent needed to impart the desired granule wetness and mixed thoroughly using a Lightnin.RTM. Mixer. The blended ingredients were placed in a Hobart planetary mixer and granulated using the glycine hydrochloride solution. Mixing and time was approximately 3 to 5 minutes. Granulation wetness was checked and additional 75% w/w SD3A alcohol (aqueous) solution was added to achieve appropriate massing.
Any clumps of wet granule were broken up by hand.
Granule was dried in a Despatch Tray Oven to 50.degree. C. for approximately 4 hours until loss on drying (by Compu-Trac.RTM., 90.degree. C.) of granule was 1 to 2%.
Dried granule was sifted through a 20 mesh Russell-Finex sifter.
Talc (pre-sifted 60 mesh) was added to a small amount of dried granule and sifted through a 20 mesh hand screen. This was added to the remainder of the granule and blended in a PK v-shell blender for 5 minutes. Magnesium stearate and colloidal silicon dioxide was sifted together through a 30 mesh hand screen, and blended in a PK v-shell blender for 15-20 minutes. This magensium stearate/colloidal silicon dioxide blend was then added to the granule/talc blend in the PK v-shell blender and blended an additional 5 minutes.
The lubricated granule was compressed on a rotary-type Manesty Betapress.RTM. in a controlled humidity environment of less than 30% relative humidity. Tablets were compressed at a compression weight of 230 mg, using 7.8 mm, round, concave, plain punches.
EXAMPLE 5
The procedure of Example 4 is repeated except that the lubricant levels are change resulting in the following formulation:
______________________________________ 100 mg potency tabletIngredient Weight (mg) per tablet______________________________________Bupropion hydrochloride 100.0Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 91.3Sodium starch glycolate, NF 9.2Glycine hydrochloride 5.0Talc, USP 22.9Magnesium stearate, NF 0.7Colloidal silicon dioxide, NF 0.2TOTAL 229.3 mg______________________________________
Tablets are compressed at approximately 229.3 mg.
EXAMPLE 6
The procedure of Example 4 is repeated except that the lubricant levels are changed resulting in the following formulation:
______________________________________ 100 mg potency tabletIngredient Weight (mg) per tablet______________________________________Bupropion hydrochloride 100.0Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 91.3Sodium starch glycolate, NF 9.2Glycine hydrochloried 5.0Talc, USP 10.9Magnesium stearate, NF 1.1Colloidal silicon dioxide, NF 0.2TOTAL 217.7 mg______________________________________
Tablets are compressed at approximately 217.7 mg.
EXAMPLE 7
The procedure of Example 4 was repeated except that the lubricant levels were changed resulting in the following formulation:
______________________________________ 100 mg potency tabletIngredient Weight (mg) per tablet______________________________________Bupropion hydrochloride 100.0Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 91.3Sodium starch glycolate, NF 9.2Glycine hydrochloride 5.0Talc, USP 10.9Magnesium stearate, NF 0.7Colloidal silicon dioxide, NF 0.2TOTAL 217.3 mg______________________________________
Tablets are compressed at approximately 217.3 mg
EXAMPLE 8
The procedure of Example 4 was repeated except magnesium stearate and colloidal silicon dioxide were replaced with sodium stearyl fumarate resulting in the following formulation:
______________________________________ 100 mg potency tabletIngredient Weight (mg) per tablet______________________________________Bupropion hydrochloride 100.0Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 91.3Sodium starch glycolate, NF 9.2Glycine hydrochloride 5.0Talc, USP 10.9Sodium stearyl fumarate 3.3TOTAL 219.7 mg______________________________________
Tablets are compressed at approximately 219.7 mg
EXAMPLE 9
The procedure of Example 4 was repeated except that the formulation is changed as follows:
______________________________________ 100 mg potency tabletIngredient Weight (mg) per tablet______________________________________Bupropion hydrochloride 100.0Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 68.8Corn starch, NF 23.0Sodium starch glycolate, NF 9.2Glycine hydrochloride 5.0Talc, USP 23.0Magnesium stearate, NF 0.8Colloidal silicon dioxide, NF 0.2TOTAL 230.0 mg______________________________________
Tablets are compressed at approximately 230.0 mg.
EXAMPLE 10
The procedure of Example 4 is repeated except sodium starch glycolate is replaced with crospovidone, resulting in the following formulation:
______________________________________ 100 mg potency tabletIngredient Weight (mg) per tablet______________________________________Bupropion hydrochloride 100.0Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 95.9Crospovidone 4.6Glycine hydrochloride 5.0Talc, USP 23.0Magnesium stearate, NF 1.2Colloidal silicon dioxide, NF 0.3TOTAL 230.0 mg______________________________________
Tablets are compressed at approximately 230.0 mg
EXAMPLE 11
The procedure of Example 4 is repeated except that the formulation is changed as follows:
______________________________________ 100 mg potency tabletIngredient Weight (mg) per tablet______________________________________Bupropion hydrochloride 100.0Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 68.8Corn starch, NF 23.0Sodium starch glycolate, NF 9.2L-Cysteine hydrochloride 5.0Talc, USP 23.0Magnesium stearate, NF 1.2Colloidal silicon dioxide, NF 0.3TOTAL 230.5 mg______________________________________
Tablets were compressed at approximately 230.5 mg
EXAMPLE 12
The procedure of Example 11 is repeated except that L-cysteine hydrochloride is replaced with glycine hydrochloride.
EXAMPLE 13
The procedure of Example 4 is repeated except that the sodium starch glycolate and colloidal silicon dioxide are removed and the formulation follows:
______________________________________ 100 mg potency tabletIngredient Weight (mg) per tablet______________________________________Bupropion hydrochloride 100.0Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 71.0Corn starch, NF 22.0L-Cysteine hydrochloride 5.0Talc, USP 22.0Magnesium stearate, NF 1.1TOTAL 221.1 mg______________________________________
Tablets were compressed at approximately 221.1 mg
EXAMPLE 14
The procedure of Example 4 was repeated except that the sodium starch glycolate was removed and the formulation follows:
______________________________________ 100 mg potency tabletIngredient Weight (mg) per tablet______________________________________Bupropion hydrochloride 100.0Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 71.0Corn starch, NF 22.0L-Cysteine hydrochloride 5.0Talc, USP 22.0Magnesium stearate, NF 1.1Colloidal silicon dioxide, NF 0.2TOTAL 221.3 mg______________________________________
Tablets were compressed at approximately 221.3 mg.
A portion of tablets was film-coated using a Compu-Lab Accela-Cota.RTM. film-coater.
The aqueous film coat Opadry Red Y-1-1846 was used for the 100 mg potency. The Acella-Cota.RTM. parameters were:
Inlet air temperature: 50.degree.-80.degree. C.
Inlet air volume: 200-1000 cfm
Exhaust air temperature: 40.degree.-60.degree. C.
Exhaust air volume: 200-1000 cfm
Tablets were coated to a weight gain of 1-5% over the core tablet weight to achieve an acceptable color intensity.
150 MG CAPSULES
EXAMPLE 15
150 mg capsules were prepared according to the following formulation and procedure:
______________________________________Ingredient Weight (mg) per capsule______________________________________Bupropion hydrochloride 150.0Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 106.5Corn starch, NF 33.00Talc, USP 33.00L-Cysteine hydrochloride 7.500TOTAL 330.0 mg______________________________________
A stock blend of bupropion hydrochloride, corn starch (purity 826) and microcrystalline cellulosde (MCC) was prepared as follows:
The above ingredients were sifted by hand through a 30 mesh screen. They were then blended in an Patterson-Kelly (P-K) v-shell blender for 10 minutes.
The proper amount of cysteine hydrochloride was weighed out and added to 85% w/w SD3A alcohol (aqueous) solution. This mixture was vigorously mixed for approximately 5 minutes. It was then immediately added to the proper amount of the above mentioned stock blend and wet-granulated in a table-top Hobart mixer.
The resulting wet granulation was screened by hand through a 16 mesh screen.
The wet granule was dried in a tray oven at 50.degree. C. for 4 hours to obtain a loss on drying (LOD) of below 2% using a CompuTrac.RTM. moisture analyzer 90.degree. C. (Upon standing the batches re-equilibrated to 2-3% LOD).
The dried granule was sifted through a 16 or 30 mesh hand screen.
The granule was lubricated with talc (sifted 60 mesh), in a P-K v-shell blender for 5 minutes.
Finished granule is encapsulated on a Chemi-Pharm manual capsule-filling machine Model No. 201, using size No. 1, white, opaque two part hard gelatin capsules.
EXAMPLE 16
The procedure of Example 15 is repeated except cysteine hydrochloride was replaced with glycine hydrochloride.
EXAMPLE 17
The procedure of Example 15 is repeated except cysteine hydrochloride was replaced with L-cystine dihydrochloride.
EXAMPLE 18
The procedure of Example 15 is repeated except cysteine hydrochloride was replaced with tartaric acid.
EXAMPLE 19
The procedure of Example 15 is repeated except cysteine hydrochloride was replaced with citric acid.
EXAMPLE 20
The procedure of Example 15 is repeated except cysteine hydrochloride was replaced with malic acid.
EXAMPLE 21
The procedure of Example 15 is repeated except cysteine hydrochloride is replaced with isoascorbic (erythorbic) acid.
EXAMPLE 22
The procedure of Example 15 is repeated except cysteine hydrochloride is replaced with ascorbic acid.
EXAMPLE 23
The procedure of Example 15 is repeated except cysteine hydrochloride is replaced with sodium metabisulfite.
CAPLETS
EXAMPLE 24
The caplets were manufactured according to the following formulation:
______________________________________ 100 mg potency capletIngredient Weight (mg) per caplet______________________________________(Core)Bupropion hydrochloride 100.0Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 274.0Sodium starch glycolate, NF 15.00L-Cysteine hydrochloride, USP 9.00Talc, USP 12.00Magnesium stearate, NF 4.00CORE WEIGHT 414.0 MG(Coating)Opadry .RTM. Red, YS-1-1846 12.00Carnauba Wax, NF 0.04TOTAL WEIGHT 426.0______________________________________
Sufficient powder ingredients were weighed out to make a batch size of approximately 60,000 caplets.
The bupropion hydrochloride, microcrystalline cellulose and sodium starch glycolate were sifted through a 20 or 30 mesh Russell Finex sifter.
The sifted ingredients were blended for 15 minutes in a 3 cu.ft. slant-cone blender.
The blended ingredients were granulated as follows:
A quantity of purified water. USP that equals approximately no more than 20% of the total weight of granulating solution needed to impart the desired granule wetness was weighed out. The cysteine hydrochloride was dissolved in the purified water using a mixer. The cysteine hydrochloride solution was added to a quantity of SD3A alcohol, anhydrous equal to the remaining 80% (no less than) of the total weight of solution needed to impart the desired granule wetness and mixed thoroughly using a mixer. The blended ingredients were placed in a 3 cu.ft. Littleford Lodige.RTM. granulator and granulated using the hydroalcoholic cysteine hydrochloride solution. Mixing and chopper time was approximately 5-10 minutes. Wetness was checked and additional 80% w/w SD3A alcohol (aqueous) solution was added to achieve appropriate massing.
Any clumps of wet granule were broken up by hand.
Granule was dried in a WST-30 Glatt fluid-bed dryer until loss on drying (by CompuTrac.RTM., 90.degree. C.) of granule was 0.8-2.0%. Fluid-bed drying parameters were set as follows:
Inlet air temperature: 60.degree. C.
Air volume: 200-1200 cu meter/hr
Dried granule was milled using a Comil.RTM. and appropriately sized screen.
Talc (pre-sifted 60 mesh) was added to small amount of dried granule and mixed by hand. Magnesium stearate (pre-sifted) was added to a small amount of dried granule and mixed by hand. Both mixtures were sifted through a 16 mesh screen in a Russell Finex sifter. This sifted mixture was added to the remainder of the granule and blended in the 3 cu.ft slant-cone blender for 5 minutes.
The lubricated granule was compressed on a rotary-type Manesty Betapress.RTM.. Caplets were compressed at a compression weight of approximately 414 gm. using 6.5.times.14.5 mm concave, caplet punches containing a partial score-bar on the upper and lower punches.
Caplets were dedusted using a Manesty Tablet Deduster.
A portion of tablets was film-coated using a Compu-Lab Accela-Cota.RTM. film-coater. The aqueous film coat Opadry Red.RTM. YS-1-1846 was used. The Accela-Cota.RTM. parameters were:
Inlet air temperature: 50.degree.-80.degree. C.
Inlet air volume: 100-500 cfm
Exhaust air temperature: 40.degree.-60.degree. C.
Caplets were coated to a weight gain of 1-5% over the core tablet weight to achieve an acceptable color intensity.
Caplets were coated with carnauba wax to assist in packaging. Carnauba wax was added to the film-coated caplets which were rotated in the coating drum for approximately 5 minutes to distribute the wax.
EXAMPLE 25
The procedure of Example 24 is repeated except:
In order to achieve a 75 mg potency, the caplets are compressed at a compression weight of approximately 310.5 mg, using 5.9.times.13.1 mm concave, caplet punches containing a partial score-bar on the upper and lower punches. The aqueous film coat Opadry.RTM. Yellow-Gold YS-1-2186 is for the 75 mg potency.
Caplets have the resulting composition:
______________________________________ 75 mg potency capletIngredient Weight (mg) per caplet______________________________________(Core)Bupropion hydrochloride 75.00Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 205.5Sodium starch glycolate, NF 11.25Cysteine hydrochloride, USP 6.750Talc, USP 9.00Magnesium stearate, NF 3.00CORE WEIGHT 310.5 mg(Coating)Opadry Yellow, YS--1-2186 9.00Carnauba Wax, NF 0.03TOTAL WEIGHT 319.5.0 mg______________________________________
EXAMPLE 26
The procedure of Example 24 is repeated except:
In order to achieve a 50 mg potency, the caplets are compressed at a compression weight of approximately 207 mg, using 5.1.times.11.4 mm concave, caplet punches containing a partial scorebar on the upper and lower punches. The aqueous film coat Opadry.RTM. White YS-1-7059 is used for the 50 mg potency. Caplets have the resuling composition:
______________________________________ 50 mg potency capletIngredient Weight (mg) per caplet______________________________________(Core)Bupropion hydrochloride 50.00Microcrystalline cellulose, NF l37.0Sodium starch glycolate, NF 7.50Cysteine hydrochloride, USP 4.50Talc, USP 6.00Magnesium stearate, NF 2.00CORE WEIGHT 207.0 mg(Coating)Opadry White .RTM., YS-1-7059 6.00Carnauba Wax, NF 0.02TOTAL WEIGHT 213.0 mg______________________________________
EXAMPLE 27
The procedure of Example 24 is repeated except:
The blended pwders are granulated with 100% SD3A Alcohol.
EXAMPLE 28
The procedure of Example 27 is repeated except:
The cysteine hydrochloride is blended in dry with the other ingredients rather than adding it to the granulating solution.
The level of cysteine hydrochloride is increased giving the caplets the following composition:
______________________________________ 100 mg potency capletIngredient Weight (mg) per caplet______________________________________(Core)Bupropion hydrochloride 100.00Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 274.0Sodium starch glycolate, NF 15.00Cysteine hydrochloride, USP 18.00Talc, USP 12.00Magnesium stearate, NF 4.00CORE WEIGHT 423.0 mg(Coating)Opadry Red .RTM., YS-1-1846 12.00Carnauba Wax, NF 0.040TOTAL WEIGHT 435.0 mg______________________________________
EXAMPLE 29
The procedure of Example 24 was followed except:
Glycine hydrochloride is used as the Stabiliser, giving the caplets the following composition:
______________________________________ 100 mg potency capletIngredient Weight (mg) per caplet______________________________________(Core)Bupropion hydrochloride 100.00Microcrystalline cellulose, NF 274.0Sodium starch glycolate, NF 15.00Glycine hydrochloride, USP 9.00Talc, USP 12.00Magnesium stearate, NF 4.00CORE WEIGHT 414.0 mg(Coating)Opadry Red .RTM., YS-1-1846 12.00Carnauba Wax, NF 0.04TOTAL WEIGHT 426.0 mg______________________________________
EXAMPLE 30
The procedure of Example 24 was repeated except:
The blended powders were granulated with 100% Isopropyl alcohol.
Claims
  • 1. A pharmaceutical composition in solid form comprising bupropion hydrochloride and absorbic acid or isoascorbic acid in an effective stabilising amount, in which the composition contains at least about 80% w/w of undegraded bupropion hydrochloride after storage for 6 weeks at about 40.degree. C. and 75% relative humidity and in which an aqueous solution of the stabiliser in a concentration of about 6% w/w has a pH of about 0.9 to about 4.
  • 2. A pharmaceutical composition according to claim 1, wherein the aqueous solution of the stabiliser has a pH of about 0.9 to 2.
  • 3. A pharmaceutical composition according to claim 1, wherein the aqueous solution of the stabiliser has a pH of around 1.
  • 4. A tablet of capsule according to claims 1, 2, or 3, wherein the amount of bupropion hydrochloride is 25 to 300 mg.
  • 5. A tablet of capsule according to claim 1, 2, or 3, wherein the amount of bupropion hydrochloride is 50, 75, 100 or 150 mg.
  • 6. A method of stabilising bupropion hydrochloride in a solid pharmaceutical composition so that at least about 80% w/w of bupropion hydrochloride is present in the undegraded form after storage for 6 weeks at about 40.degree. C. and 75% relative humidity, wherein said method comprises mixing bupropion hydrochloride with a ascorbic or isoascorbic acid of which an aqueous solution in a concentration of about 6% w/w has a pH of about 0.9 to about 4.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
9315856 Jul 1993 GBX
PCT/GB94/01642 Jul 1994 WOX
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/105,437 filed Aug. 12, 1993, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,358,970 (issue fee paid).

US Referenced Citations (19)
Number Name Date Kind
RE33994 Baker et al. Jul 1992
3819706 Mehta Jun 1974
3885046 Mehta May 1975
4347176 Mehta Aug 1982
4347177 Phillips Aug 1982
4347178 Findlay et al. Aug 1982
4347257 Stern Aug 1982
4347382 Scharver Aug 1982
4355179 Findlay et al. Oct 1982
4356165 Findlay Oct 1982
4393078 Peck Jul 1983
4425363 Stern Jan 1984
4435449 Stern Mar 1984
4438138 Stern Mar 1984
4507323 Stern Mar 1985
4571395 Peck Feb 1986
4687660 Baker et al. Aug 1987
4769027 Baker et al. Sep 1988
4798826 Peck Jan 1989
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
0171457A1 Feb 1986 EPX
0467488A2 Jan 1992 EPX
WO9219226 Nov 1992 WOX
WO9404138 Mar 1994 WOX
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Steven M. Walters; Influence of pH on Hydrolytic Decomposition of Diethylopropion Hydrochloride: Stability Studies on Drug Substance and Tablets Using High-Performance Liquid Ohromatography Journ. of Pharm. Sciences; vol. 69; No. 10; Oct. 1980; pp. 1206-1209.
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 105437 Aug 1993