The present invention relates to improved stabilizer bars, such as the stabilizer bars used in automotive suspensions.
Conventional stabilizer bars include a torsion bar that is generally made of steel and attachment points at each end of this bar at which the bar is attached to appropriate suspension components of the vehicle.
Andersen U.S. Pat. No. 4,138,141 describes a tubular suspension bar that is connected at each end to an attachment arm. However, a need presently exists for an improved stabilizer bar that is light in weight and corrosion resistant, and that can be located with a minimum number of parts.
By way of general introduction, the stabilizer bar described below includes a fiber-reinforced composite rod. Each end of the rod fits into a recess in a respective mounting arm, and the arms are secured to the rod ends at the recesses. Preferably, the arms are made of a light metal alloy, and the composite rod includes a fiber-reinforced resin tube.
This section has been provided by way of general introduction, and it should not be used to narrow the scope of the following claims.
Turning now to the drawings,
The composite rod 12 includes a first end 20 and a second end 22. As used herein, the term “end” is intended broadly to encompass the extreme end as well as portions of the rod 12 adjacent the extreme end. As shown in
The arms 14 are identical in this example, and an inner portion of one of the arms 14 is shown in
In this example, each arm 14 includes a larger cross-sectional area 34 that is closer to the rod 12 and a smaller cross-sectional area 36 that is farther from the rod 12 (
It is not essential in all embodiments that the rod 12 be straight as shown in
In order to minimize weight and cost of the rod 12, it is preferred to orient the fibers of the rod 12 to carry the torsional and bending loads applied to the rod 12 efficiently. In particular, the rod 12 acts as a torsion bar in both the counterclockwise and the clockwise directions, and it is therefore preferred to include fibers oriented at an angle to the longitudinal axis 26 (
In one example, the rod 12 is formed from many layers of substantially unidirectional fibers. In one example, 32 separate layers are table rolled onto a mandrel. The mandrel is provided with a release agent, such that the mandrel can be removed after the rod is formed. Each of the layers in this example is made up of substantially unidirectional carbon fibers impregnated in a resin binder. For example, each layer can be approximately 0.006 inch thick with the density of about 0.055 lbs/cubic inch. Suitable impregnated fibers can be obtained from Newport Carbon Fibers as product no. NCT 301-1 G 150 (34-700). In this example, the resin binder is formed of a suitable epoxy.
In this example, the 32 separate layers are oriented as set out in Table 1. In Table 1, layer 1 is the radially innermost layer, and layer 32 is the radially outermost layer.
It is not essential in all embodiments that the fibers be oriented precisely at 0°, +45° and −45°. In each case, a tolerance band about each direction of ±15°, more preferably ±10°, or most preferably ±5° can be used. Also, it is not essential that all of the fibers be oriented as described above. Preferably, more than 50%, more preferably more than 75% and most preferably more than 95% of the fibers are oriented in the preferred directions described above.
Many materials can be used for the composite rod. Preferably, carbon fiber is used as described above, but fiberglass, aramid fiber and other fibers can be used. If desired, an outer layer of aramid fiber can be applied to improve impact resistance. Also, many manufacturing techniques can be used to form the composite rod 12, including the table-roll technique described above, bladder molding processes and filament winding processes.
The arms 14 can be formed of any suitable material. Light metal alloys such as alloys including aluminum, magnesium and titanium are preferred, because they reduce the overall weight of the stabilizer bar. The cross-sectional shape of the arms can be optimized to reduce weight, as by using an oval or an I-beam cross-sectional profile where appropriate. The arms can be shaped in any desired manner, as for example by casting or forging. When the arms are made of an aluminum alloy, the alloy can be anodized to avoid galvanic corrosion between the aluminum and the carbon fiber. Preferably, the arm is shaped to avoid upset profiles, thereby improving the ease of manufacturing.
The arms are held to the rod ends using any suitable approach. The presently preferred approach is to use radial crimping dies to deform or crimp the outermost portion of each arm against the tube 12 and the plug 32. The plug 32 supports the rod end against radial collapse during the crimping operation. Such radial crimping preferably employs multiple crimping points to reduce or eliminate slipping at the joint. The plug 32 can be integrally formed with the arm 14 as shown in
The stabilizer bar described above provides important advantages. It is unusually light in weight and corrosion resistant as compared to a traditional steel stabilizer bar, and the configuration of the arms allows axial movement of the stabilizer bar to be controlled with reference to the vehicle chassis in a particularly simple and low-cost manner.
The foregoing detailed description has described only a few of the many forms that this invention can take. This detailed description is therefore intended by way of illustration. It is only the following claims, including all equivalents, that are intended to define the scope of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3638455 | Francois | Feb 1972 | A |
4138141 | Andersen | Feb 1979 | A |
4372576 | Inoue | Feb 1983 | A |
4380483 | Kliger | Apr 1983 | A |
4431157 | Arild | Feb 1984 | A |
4473217 | Hashimoto | Sep 1984 | A |
4540197 | Finn et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4693140 | Stephan et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4718693 | Booher | Jan 1988 | A |
4836516 | Wycech | Jun 1989 | A |
4842298 | Jarvis | Jun 1989 | A |
4908930 | Wycech | Mar 1990 | A |
5120032 | Smith | Jun 1992 | A |
5549370 | Folsom | Aug 1996 | A |
5603490 | Folsom | Feb 1997 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 351 723 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0 391 222 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0 439 197 | Jul 1991 | EP |
0 612 931 | Aug 1994 | EP |
2 178 820 | Feb 1987 | GB |
61-21433 | Jan 1986 | JP |
WO 9847729 | Oct 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020180173 A1 | Dec 2002 | US |